Ship inspection and survey organisations (Directive recast) ***II European Parliament legislative resolution of 24 September 2008 on the Council common position adopted with a view to the adoptiong of a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations and for the relevant activities of maritime administrations (recast) (5724/2/2008 — C6-0222/2008 — 2005/0237A(COD))#P6_TC2-COD(2005)0237A Position of the European Parliament adopted at second reading on 24 September 2008 with a view to the adoption of Directive 2008/…/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on compliance with flag State requirements and on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations and for the relevant activities of maritime administrations (Recast)#ANNEX I#ANNEX II CORRELATION TABLE
Date: 2008-09-24
Institutions: Committee on Transport and Tourism, European Parliament
Subjects: codecision procedure, drafting of EU law, international standard, maritime safety, pollution from ships, prevention of pollution, resolution of parliament, roadworthiness tests, technical regulations, transport safety, vessel








CE2010008EN.01026101.xml










14.1.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CE 8/261





Wednesday 24 September 2008Ship inspection and survey organisations (Directive recast) ***II
P6_TA(2008)0447
European Parliament legislative resolution of 24 September 2008 on the Council common position adopted with a view to the adoptiong of a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations and for the relevant activities of maritime administrations (recast) (5724/2/2008 — C6-0222/2008 — 2005/0237A(COD))
2010/C 8 E/43
(Codecision procedure: second reading)

The European Parliament,
having regard to the Council common position (5724/2/2008 — C6-0222/2008) (1),
having regard to its position at first reading (2) on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2005)0587),
having regard to Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty,
having regard to Rule 62 of its Rules of Procedure,
having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A6-0331/2008),






1.


Approves the common position as amended;










2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.






(1)  OJ C 184 E, 22.7.2008, p. 11.

(2)  OJ C 74 E, 20.3.2008, p. 632.


Wednesday 24 September 2008P6_TC2-COD(2005)0237A
Position of the European Parliament adopted at second reading on 24 September 2008 with a view to the adoption of Directive 2008/…/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on compliance with flag State requirements and on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations and for the relevant activities of maritime administrations (Recast)
(Text with EEA relevance)
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 80(2) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,
Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee (1),
Having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions (2),
Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty (3),
Whereas:






(1)


Council Directive 94/57/EC of 22 November 1994 on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations and for the relevant activities of maritime administrations (4) has been significantly amended on several occasions. Since further amendments are to be made, it should be recast in the interests of clarity.










(2)


In view of the nature of the provisions of Directive 94/57/EC it seems appropriate that its provisions be recast in two different Community legal instruments, namely a Directive and a Regulation.










(3)


In its Resolution of 8 June 1993 on a common policy on safe seas (5), the Council set the objective of removing all substandard vessels from Community waters and gave priority to Community action designed to secure the effective and uniform implementation of international rules by drawing up common standards for classification societies
, defined as ship inspection and survey organisations (hereinafter ‘recognised organisations’)
.










(4)


Safety and pollution prevention at sea may be effectively enhanced by strictly applying international conventions, codes and resolutions while furthering the objective of freedom to provide services.










(5)


The control of compliance of ships with the uniform international standards for safety and prevention of pollution of the seas is the responsibility of flag and port States.










(6)


Member States are responsible for the issuing of international certificates for safety and the prevention of pollution provided for under conventions such as the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea of 1 November 1974 (SOLAS 74), the International Convention on Load Lines of 5 April 1966 and the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships of 2 November 1973 (Marpol), and for the implementation of those conventions.










(7)


In compliance with such conventions all Member States may authorise to a varying extent recognised organisations for the certification of such compliance and may delegate the issue of the relevant certificates for safety and the prevention of pollution.










(8)


Worldwide a large number of the existing 
recognised organisations
 do not ensure either adequate implementation of the rules or 
the necessary
 reliability when acting on behalf of national administrations as they do not have ▐ adequate structures and experience to enable them to carry out their 
tasks
 in a highly professional manner.












(9)






In addition,
 these 
recognised organisations
 produce and implement rules for the design, construction, maintenance and inspection of ships and they are responsible for inspecting ships on behalf of the flag States and certifying that those ships meet the requirements of the international conventions for the issue of the relevant certificates. To enable them to carry out that duty in a satisfactory manner they need to have strict independence, highly specialised technical competence and rigorous quality management.












(10)






Recognised organisations
 should be able to offer their services throughout the Community and compete with each other while providing equal levels of safety and of environmental protection. The necessary professional standards for their activities should therefore be uniformly established and applied across the Community.










(11)


The issue of the cargo ship safety radio certificate may be entrusted to private bodies having sufficient expertise and qualified personnel.










(12)


A Member State may restrict the number of recognised organisations it authorises in accordance with its needs, based on objective and transparent grounds, subject to control exercised by the Commission in accordance with a committee procedure.










(13)


This Directive should ensure freedom to provide services in the Community; accordingly the 
Commission
 should be entitled to negotiate, with those third countries where some of the recognised organisations are located,▐ equal treatment for the recognised organisations 
domiciled
 in the Community.










(14)


A tight involvement of the national administrations in ship surveys and in the issue of the related certificates is necessary to ensure full compliance with the international safety rules even if the Member States rely upon recognised organisations, which are not part of their administration for carrying out statutory duties. It is appropriate, therefore, to establish a close working relationship between the administrations and the recognised organisations authorised by them, which may require that the recognised organisations have a local representation on the territory of the Member State on behalf of which they perform their duties.










(15)


Divergence in 
terms of
 financial liability regimes 
among
 the recognised organisations working on behalf of the Member States would impede the proper implementation of this Directive. In order to contribute to solving this problem it is appropriate to bring about a degree of harmonisation at Community level of the liability arising out of any marine casualty caused by a recognised organisation, as decided by a court of law, including settlement of a dispute through arbitration procedures.










(16)


The measures necessary for the implementation of this Directive should be adopted in accordance with Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission (6).










(17)


In particular the Commission should be empowered to amend this Directive in order to incorporate subsequent amendments to the international conventions, protocols, codes and resolutions related thereto. Since those measures are of general scope and are designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive, inter alia by supplementing it with new non-essential elements, they must be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny provided for in Article 5a of Decision 1999/468/EC.










(18)


Member States should nevertheless be left with the possibility of suspending ▐ their authorisation of a recognised organisation 
for reasons of serious danger to safety or the environment. The Commission should decide without delay, in accordance with a committee procedure, whether any national measure to the above effect should be overruled
.










(19)


Member States should periodically assess the performance of the recognised organisations working on their behalf and provide the Commission and all the other Member States with precise information related to such performance.










(20)


As port authorities, Member States are required to enhance safety and prevention of pollution in Community waters through priority inspection of ships carrying certificates of organisations which do not fulfil the common criteria, thereby ensuring that ships flying the flag of a third State do not receive more favourable treatment.










(21)


At present there are no uniform international standards to which all ships must conform either at the building stage or during their entire lifetime, as regards hull, machinery and electrical and control installations. Such standards may be fixed according to the rules of recognised organisations or to equivalent standards to be decided by the national administrations in accordance with the procedure laid down in Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services (7).










(22)


Since the objective of this Directive, namely to establish measures to be followed by the Member States in their relationship with organisations entrusted with the inspection, survey and certification of ships, operating in the Community, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore, by reason of the scale of the action, be better achieved at Community level, the Community may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.










(23)


The obligation to transpose this Directive into national law should be confined to those provisions which represent a substantive change as compared with the Directive 94/57/EC. The obligation to transpose the provisions which are unchanged arises under that Directive.










(24)


This Directive should be without prejudice to the obligations of the Member States relating to the time limits for transposition into national law of the Directives set out in Annex I, Part B.










(25)


In accordance with point 34 of the Interinstitutional Agreement on better law-making (8), Member States are encouraged to draw up, for themselves and in the interest of the Community, their own tables, illustrating, as far as possible, the correlation between this Directive and the transposition measures, and to make them public.










(26)


Measures to be followed by 
recognised organisations
 are laid down in Regulation (EC) No …/… of the European Parliament and the Council of … (9)
[on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations]
 (10)║,




HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:

Article 1



The purpose of
 this Directive 
is:










(a)






to ensure that Member States effectively and consistently discharge their obligations as flag States in accordance with international conventions;














(b)






to establish
 measures to be followed by the Member States in their relationship with 
recognised
 organisations 
which they have
 entrusted with the inspection, survey and certification of ships for compliance with the international conventions on safety at sea and prevention of marine pollution, while furthering the objective of freedom to provide services. This 
process
 includes the development and implementation of safety requirements for hull, machinery and electrical
, radiotelephone,
 and control installations of ships falling under the scope of 
those
 international conventions.





Article 2

For the purpose of this Directive the following definitions shall apply:






(a)


‘ship’ means a ship falling within the scope of the international conventions;










(b)


‘ship flying the flag of a Member State’ means a ship registered in and flying the flag of a Member State in accordance with its legislation. Ships not corresponding to this definition are assimilated to ships flying the flag of a third country;










(c)


‘inspections and surveys’ means inspections and surveys that are mandatory under the international conventions 
and under this Directive and other Community legislation concerning maritime safety
;










(d)


‘international conventions’ means the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea of 1 November 1974, (SOLAS 74)▐ the International Convention of Load Lines of 5 April 1966
,
 the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships of 2 November 1973 (Marpol), 
the International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships, 1969 (Tonnage 69), the International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers, 1978 (STCW 1978), and the Convention on International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972 (COLREG 72),
 together with the protocols and amendments thereto, and the related codes of mandatory status in all Member States, in their up-to-date version;












(e)






‘Flag State Code’ means parts 1 and 2 of the ‘Code for the Implementation of Mandatory IMO Instruments’, adopted by the IMO through Assembly Resolution A.996(25) on 29 November 2007, in its up-to-date version;














(f)






‘administration’ means the competent authorities of the Member State whose flag the ship is flying, including departments, agencies, and bodies, in charge of the implementation of the Flag State-related provisions of the IMO Conventions;













(g)



‘organisation’ means a legal entity, its subsidiaries and any other entities under its control, which jointly or separately carry out tasks falling under the scope of this Directive;











(h)



‘control’ means, for the purpose of point (g), rights, contracts or any other means, in law or in fact, which, either separately or in combination confer the possibility of exercising decisive influence on a legal entity or enable that entity to carry out tasks falling under the scope of this Directive;











(i)



‘recognised organisation’ means an organisation recognised in accordance with Regulation (EC) No …/… (11)
[on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations];











(j)



‘authorisation’ means an act whereby a Member State grants an authorisation or delegates powers to a recognised organisation;











(k)



‘statutory certificate’ means a certificate issued by or on behalf of a flag State in accordance with the international conventions;











(l)



‘rules and procedures’ means a recognised organisation's requirements for the design, construction, equipment, maintenance and survey of ships;











(m)



‘
classification
 certificate’ means a document issued by a recognised organisation certifying the fitness of a ship for a particular use or service in accordance with the rules and 
regulations
 laid down and made public by that recognised organisation;











(n)



‘cargo ship safety radio certificate’ means the certificate introduced by the 1988 Protocol amending SOLAS, adopted by the International Maritime Organisation (IMO).





Article 3

1.   In assuming their responsibilities and obligations under the international conventions, Member States shall ensure that their competent administrations can ensure appropriate enforcement of the provisions thereof, 
in accordance with paragraphs 2 to 4
.


2.
   
Member States shall apply the provisions of the Flag State Code.




3.
   
Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that an independent audit of their administration is carried out at least once every five years in accordance with the provisions of Resolution A.974 (24), adopted by the IMO Assembly on 1 December 2005. They shall ensure, on the basis of the audit findings, that, if appropriate, a comprehensive corrective plan is drawn up in accordance with section 8 of Part II of the Annex to that Resolution and ensure implementation in a timely and effective manner.




4.
   
Member States shall take the necessary measures with regard to the inspection and survey of ships and the issue of statutory certificates and exemption certificates as provided for by the international conventions.



5.   Where for the purpose of paragraph 1a Member State decides with respect to ships flying its flag:






(i)


to authorise organisations to undertake fully or in part inspections and surveys related to statutory certificates including those for the assessment of compliance with the rules referred to in Article 15(2) and, where appropriate, to issue or renew the related certificates; or










(ii)


to 
entrust recognised
 organisations 
with the task of undertaking
 fully or in part the inspections and surveys referred to in point (i);




it shall entrust these duties only to recognised organisations.
The competent administration shall in all cases approve the first issue of the exemption certificates.
However, for the cargo ship safety radio certificate these duties may be entrusted to a private body recognised by a competent administration and having sufficient expertise and qualified personnel to carry out specified safety assessment work on radio-communication on its behalf.

6.   This Article does not concern the certification of specific items of marine equipment.

Article 4


Flag State requirements



1.
   
Prior to allowing the operation of a ship, which has been granted the right to fly its flag, the Member State concerned shall take the appropriate measures to ensure that the ship in question complies with the applicable international rules and regulations. In particular, it shall verify the safety records of the ship by all reasonable means. It shall, if necessary, consult with the administration of the losing flag State in order to establish whether any outstanding deficiencies or safety issues identified by that administration remain unresolved.




2.
   
Whenever a flag State requests information concerning a ship which was previously flying the flag of a Member State, the requested Member State shall promptly provide details of outstanding deficiencies and any other relevant safety-related information to the requesting flag State.




3.
   
When the administration is informed that a ship flying the flag of the Member State concerned has been detained by a port State, it shall oversee the appropriate corrective measures to bring the ship into compliance with the applicable regulations and IMO Conventions. For that purpose, that administration shall establish the applicable procedures.



Article 5



Member States shall ensure that at least the following information concerning the ships flying their flag is kept under the direct control of a public authority and remains at all times readily accessible to the administration by appropriate electronic means:










(a)






particulars of the ship (name, IMO number, etc.);














(b)






dates of the surveys, including additional and supplementary surveys, if any, and audits;














(c)






identification of the recognised organisations involved in the certification and classification of the ship;














(d)






identification of the body which has inspected the ship under Port State control provisions and dates of the inspections;














(e)






outcome of the port State control inspections (deficiencies: yes or no; detentions: yes or no);














(f)






information on casualties;














(g)






identification of the ships which have ceased to fly the flag of the Member State concerned during the previous 12 months.








Member States shall, upon request, provide the Commission with the above- mentioned data.



Article 6



1.
   
Each Member State shall, within the framework of a quality management system, continuously evaluate and review its performance as a flag State. Those evaluations shall, over a [36] month period, cover all aspects of the quality management system for the operational parts of the administration.




As a minimum, the following performance indicators shall be included in the evaluation:








—




port State control detention rates,












—




flag State inspection results, and












—




performance indicators, as may be appropriate, to determine whether staffing, resources and administrative procedures are adequate to meet the flag State obligations.








2.
   
Member States which have carried out evaluations in accordance with paragraph 1, second subparagraph and appear on the black [or grey] list as published in the annual report of the Paris Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on Port State Control on 1 July of the year of completion of the evaluations shall provide the Commission with a report on their performance as flag States no later than 1 November of the year of completion of the evaluation.




The report shall identify and analyse the main reasons for the lack of performance; it shall also include a plan for remedial and corrective actions, including supplementary surveys where appropriate, that will be carried out at the earliest opportunity.




3.
   
The quality management system shall be set up and certified within … (12).



Article 7



The Commission shall, before the end of [2010], submit to the European Parliament and the Council a report on the feasibility of establishing a Memorandum of Understanding on flag State control obligations, aiming at ensuring a level playing field between flag States which have committed themselves to implementing in a mandatory way the Flag State Code and agreed to be audited in accordance with the provisions of Resolution A. 974 (24), adopted by the IMO Assembly on 1 December 2005.


Article 8

Relationship with recognised organisations

1.   In applying Article 3(5), Member States shall in principle not refuse to authorise any of the recognised organisations to undertake such functions, subject to the provisions of paragraph 2 of this Article and Articles 9 and 13. However, they may restrict the number of organisations they authorise in accordance with their needs provided that there are transparent and objective grounds for so doing.
At the request of a Member State, the Commission shall, in accordance with the regulatory procedure referred to in Article 10(2), adopt appropriate measures.
2.   In order for a Member State to accept that a recognised organisation located in a third State is to carry out
, on its behalf,
 the duties mentioned in Article 3
, or part of those duties,
 it may 
require
 the third State in question to grant reciprocal treatment for those recognised organisations which are located in the Community.
In addition, the Community may request the third State where a recognised organisation is located to grant reciprocal treatment to those recognised organisations which are located in the Community.
Article 9
1.   Member States which take a decision as described in Article 3(5) shall establish a ‘working relationship’ between their competent administration and the organisations acting on their behalf.
2.   The working relationship shall be regulated by a formalised written and non-discriminatory agreement or equivalent legal arrangements setting out the specific duties and functions assumed by the organisations and including at least:






(a)


the provisions set out in Appendix II of IMO Resolution A.739(18) on guidelines for the authorisation of organisations acting on behalf of the administration, while drawing inspiration from the Annex, Appendices and Attachment to IMO MSC/Circular 710 and MEPC/Circular 307 on a model agreement for the authorisation of recognised organisations acting on behalf of the administration.

Accordingly, when a recognised organisation, its inspectors, or its technical staff issue the required certificates on behalf of the administration, they shall be subject to legal safeguards and judicial protection, including the exercise of any rights of defence, in the same manner as those to which the administration and its members could have had recourse had the administration issued the required certificates itself;











(b)


the following provisions concerning financial liability:






(i)


if liability arising out of any marine casualty is finally and definitely imposed on the administration by a court of law or as part of the settlement of a dispute through arbitration procedures, together with a requirement to compensate the injured parties for loss of or damage to property or personal injury or death, which is proved in that court of law to have been caused by a wilful act or omission or gross negligence of the recognised organisation, its bodies, employees, agents or others who act on behalf of the recognised organisation, the administration shall be entitled to financial compensation from the recognised organisation to the extent that that loss, damage, injury or death was, as decided by that court, caused by the recognised organisation;










(ii)


if liability arising out of any marine casualty is finally and definitely imposed on the administration by a court of law or as part of the settlement of a dispute through arbitration procedures, together with a requirement to compensate the injured parties for personal injury 
not resulting in
 death, which is proved in that court of law to have been caused by any negligent or reckless act or omission of the recognised organisation, its employees, agents or others who act on behalf of the recognised organisation, the administration shall be entitled to 
claim
 financial compensation from the recognised organisation to the extent that that personal injury 
not resulting in
 death was, as decided by that court, caused by the recognised organisation; the Member States may limit the maximum amount payable by the recognised organisation, which must, however, be at least equal to EUR 4 million
, except where the amount determined in the judgment or settlement is lower, in which case this latter amount shall constitute the compensation payable
;










(iii)


if liability arising out of any marine casualty is finally and definitely imposed on the administration by a court of law or as part of the settlement of a dispute through arbitration procedures, together with a requirement to compensate the injured parties for loss of or damage to property, which is proved in that court of law to have been caused by any negligent or reckless act or omission of the recognised organisation, its employees, agents or others who act on behalf of the recognised organisation, the administration shall be entitled to 
claim
 financial compensation from the recognised organisation, to the extent that that loss or damage was, as decided by that court, caused by the recognised organisation; the Member States may limit the maximum amount payable by the recognised organisation, which must, however, be at least equal to EUR 2 million
, except where the amount determined in the judgment or settlement is lower, in which case this latter amount shall constitute the compensation payable
;














(c)


provisions for a periodical audit by the administration or by an impartial external body appointed by the administration into the duties the organisations are undertaking on its behalf, as referred to in Article 13(1);










(d)


the possibility for random and detailed inspections of ships;










(e)


provisions for 
compulsory
 reporting 
of
 essential information about their classed fleet, and changes, suspensions and withdrawals of class.




3.   The agreement or equivalent legal arrangement may require the recognised organisation to have a local representation on the territory of the Member State on behalf of which it performs the duties referred to in Article 3. A local representation with legal personality under the law of the Member State and subject to the jurisdiction of its national courts may satisfy such a requirement.
4.   Each Member State shall provide the Commission with precise information on the working relationship established in accordance with this Article. The Commission shall subsequently inform the other Member States thereof.
Article 10
1.   The Commission shall be assisted by the Committee on Safe Seas and the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (COSS) established by Regulation (EC) No 2099/2002 (13).
2.   Where reference is made to this paragraph, Articles 5 and 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.
The period laid down in Article 5(6) of Decision 1999/468/EC shall be set at three months.
3.   Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 5a(1) to (4) and Article 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.
Article 11
1.   This Directive may, without broadening its scope, be amended in order to:






(a)


incorporate, for the purposes of this Directive, subsequent amendments to the international conventions, protocols, codes and resolutions related thereto referred to in Articles 2(d), 3(1) and 9(2), which have entered into force;










(b)


alter the amounts specified in points (ii) and (iii) of Article 9(2)(b).




These measures designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 10(3).
2.   Following the adoption of new instruments or protocols to the international conventions referred to in Article 2(d), the Council, acting on a proposal from the Commission, shall decide, taking into account the Member States’ parliamentary procedures as well as the relevant procedures within the IMO, on the detailed arrangements for ratifying those new instruments or protocols, while ensuring that they are applied uniformly and simultaneously in the Member States.
The amendments to the international instruments referred to in Articles 2(d) and 9 may be excluded from the scope of this Directive, pursuant to Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 2099/2002.
Article 12
Notwithstanding the ▐ criteria specified in ║Annex I of Regulation (EC) No …/… (14)
[on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations], where a Member State considers that a recognised organisation can no longer be authorised to carry out on its behalf the tasks specified in Article 3 it may suspend▐ such authorisation 
by the following procedure:










(a)




the Member State shall inform the Commission and the other Member States of its decision without delay and shall give substantiated reasons therefor

;














(b)






the Commission, having regard to safety and pollution prevention, must assess the reasons put forward by the Member State for suspending its authorisation of the recognised organisation;














(c)






acting in accordance with the regulatory procedure referred to in Article 10(2), the Commission shall inform the Member State whether or not its decision to suspend the authorisation is sufficiently justified for reasons of serious danger to safety or the environment. If the decision is not justified, the Commission shall request the Member State to withdraw the suspension. If the decision is justified and the Member State, pursuant to Article 8(1), has restricted the number of organisations acting on its behalf, the Commission shall request the Member State to grant a new authorisation to another recognised organisation to replace the suspended organisation.






Article 13
1.   Each Member State shall 
check
 that the recognised organisations acting on its behalf for the purposes of Article 3(5) effectively carry out the functions referred to in that Article to the satisfaction of its competent administration.
2.   Each Member State shall▐ , at least on a biennial basis
, monitor every organisation acting on its behalf
 and shall provide the other Member States and the Commission with a report on the results of 
these
 monitoring 
activities
 at the latest by 31 March of the year following the years 
in
 which 
they are carried out
.
Article 14
In exercising their inspection rights and obligations as port States, Member States shall report to the Commission and to other Member States, and inform the flag State concerned, if they find that valid statutory certificates have been issued by recognised organisations acting on behalf of a flag State to a ship which does not fulfil the relevant requirements of the international conventions, or in the event of any failure of a ship carrying a valid class certificate and relating to items covered by that certificate. Only cases of ships representing a serious threat to safety and the environment or showing evidence of particularly negligent behaviour of the recognised organisations shall be reported for the purposes of this Article. The recognised organisation concerned shall be advised of the case at the time of the initial inspection so that it can take appropriate follow-up action immediately.
Article 15
1.   Each Member State shall ensure that ships flying its flag are designed, constructed, equipped and maintained in accordance with the rules and procedures relating to hull, machinery and electrical and control installation requirements of a recognised organisation.
2.   A Member State may decide to use rules it considers equivalent to the rules and procedures of a recognised organisation only on the proviso that it immediately notifies them to the Commission in conformity with the procedure under Directive 98/34/EC and to the other Member States and they are not objected to by another Member State or the Commission and are held, through the regulatory procedure referred to in Article 10(2) of this Directive, not to be equivalent.
3.   Member States shall cooperate with the recognised organisations they authorise in the development of the rules and procedures of those organisations. They shall confer with the recognised organisations with a view to achieving consistent interpretation of the international conventions.
Article 16

Final provisions

The Commission shall, on a biennial basis, inform the European Parliament and the Council of progress in the implementation of this Directive in the Member States.
Article 17
1.   Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with 
Articles […] and points […] of Annex I [articles or subdivisions thereof and points of Annex I marking a substantive change from Directive 94/57/EC] within
 … (15). They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof 
and shall, in addition, supply a table showing the correlation between those provisions and this Directive
.
When they are adopted by Member States, these measures shall contain a reference to this Directive or shall be accompanied by such reference on the occasion of their official publication. They shall also include a statement that references in existing laws, regulations and administrative provisions to the directives repealed by this Directive shall be construed as references to this Directive. The methods of making such references shall be laid down by Member States.
2.   Member States shall communicate to the Commission the text of the main provisions of national law which they adopt in the field covered by this Directive.
Article 18
Directive 94/57/EC, as amended by the Directives listed in Annex I, Part A, shall be repealed with effect from … (16), without prejudice to the obligations of the Member States relating to the time-limits for transposition into national law of the Directives set out in Annex I, Part B.
References to the repealed Directives shall be construed as references to this Directive and shall be read in accordance with the correlation table in Annex II.
Article 19
This Directive shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Article 20
This Directive is addressed to the Member States.

Done at …, on …

For the European Parliament

The President



For the Council

The President





(1)  OJ C 318, 23.12.2006, p. 195.

(2)  OJ C 229, 22.9.2006, p. 38.

(3)  Position of the European Parliament of 25 April 2007 (OJ C 74 E, 20.3.2008, p. 632), Council Common Position of 6 June 2008 (OJ C 184 E, 22.7.2008, p. 11) and Position of the European Parliament of 24 September 2008.

(4)  OJ L 319, 12.12.1994, p. 20. ║.

(5)  

OJ C 271, 7.10.1993, p. 1.



(6)  OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p. 23. ║.

(7)  OJ L 204, 21.7.1998, p. 37. ║.

(8)  OJ C 321, 31.12.2003, p. 1.

(9)  OJ … ║ .

(10)  OJ L …

(11)  OJ … ║ .

(12)  
Three years from the entry into force of this Directive.



(13)  Regulation (EC) No 2099/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Committee on Safe Seas and the prevention of pollution from Ships (COSS) (OJ L 324, 29.11.2002, p. 1). ║.

(14)  OJ … ║ .

(15)  
18 months from the date of entry into force of this Directive.

(16)  ║ Date of entry into force of this Directive.

Wednesday 24 September 2008ANNEX I
PART A
REPEALED DIRECTIVE WITH ITS SUCCESSIVE AMENDMENTS
(referred to in Article 18)






Council Directive 94/57/EC



OJ L 319, 12.12.1994, p. 20





Commission Directive 97/58/EC



OJ L 274, 7.10.1997, p. 8





Directive 2001/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council



OJ L 19, 22.1.2002, p. 9





Directive 2002/84/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council



OJ L 324, 29.11.2002, p. 53





PART B
LIST OF TIME-LIMITS FOR TRANSPOSITION INTO NATIONAL LAW
(referred to in Article 18)






Directive


Time-limit for transposition




94/57/EC


31 December 1995




97/58/EC


30 September 1998




2001/105/EC


22 July 2003




2002/84/EC


23 November 2003






Wednesday 24 September 2008ANNEX II
CORRELATION TABLE







Directive 94/57/EC


This Directive


Regulation (EC) No …/… (1)
[on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations]





Article 1


Article 1


Article 1




Article 2(a)


Article 2(a)


Article 2(a)




Article 2(b)


Article 2(b)


—




Article 2(c)


Article 2(c)


—




Article 2(d)


Article 2(d)


Article 2(b)




Article 2(e)



Article 2(g)



Article 2(c)




—



Article 2(h)



Article 2(d)




Article 2(f)



Article 2(i)



Article 2(e)




Article 2(g)



Article 2(j)



Article 2(f)




Article 2(h)



Article 2(k)



Article 2(g)




Article 2(i)



Article 2(m)



Article 2(i)




—



Article 2(l)



Article 2(h)




Article 2(j)



Article 2(n)



—




Article 2(k)


—


Article 2(j)




Article 3


Article 3


—




Article 4(1) first phrase


—


Article 3(1)




Article 4(1) second phrase


—


Article 3(2)




Article 4(1) third phrase


—


—




Article 4(1) fourth phrase


—


Article 4(1)




—


—


Article 3(3)




—


—


Article 4(2), (3), (4)




—


—


Article 5




—


—


Article 6




—


—


Article 7




Article 5(1)



Article 8(1)



—




Article 5(3)



Article 8(2)



—




Article 6(1), (2), (3), (4)



Article 9 (1), (2), (3), (4)



—




Article 6(5)


—


—




Article 7



Article 10



Article 12




Article 8(1) first indent



Article 11(1), point (a) of first subparagraph



—




Article 8(1) second indent


—


Article 13(1)




Article 8(1) third indent



Article 11(1), point (b) of first subparagraph



—




—



Article 11(1) second subparagraph



Article 13(1) (second subparagraph)




Article 8(2)



Article 11(2)



—




Article 8(2) second subparagraph


—


Article 13(2)




Article 9(1)


—


—




Article 9(2)


—


—




Article 10(1) introduction




Article 12



—




Article 10(1)(a), (b), (c), (2), (3), (4)


—


—




Article 11(1), (2)



Article 13(1), (2)



—




Article 11(3), (4)


—


Article 8(1)(2)




Article 12



Article 14



—




Article 13


—


—




Article 14



Article 15(1), (2)



—




—



Article 15(3)



—




—



Article 16



—




—


—


Article 9




Article 15(1)


—


—




—


—


Article 10(1)(2)




Article 15(2)


—


Article 10(3)




Article 15(3)


—


Article 10(4)




Article 15(4)


—


Article 10(5)




Article 15(5)


—


Article 10(6) first, second, third, fifth subparagraphs




—


 


Article 10(6) fourth subparagraph




Article 16



Article 17



—




Article 17



Article 20



—




—



Article 18



—




—



Article 19



—




—


—


Article 11




—


—


Article 14




—


—


Article 15




—


—


Article 16




—


—


Article 17




—


—


Article 18




—


—


Article 19




Annex


—


Annex I




—


Annex I


—




—


Annex II


Annex II






(1)  OJ … ║ .