Case T-126/04: Order of the Court of First Instance of 12 September 2008 — Goris v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Interlocutory judgment — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2008-09-12
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, action by staff, administrator, appointment of staff, professional career, trade promotion

C 301/34

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

22.11.2008

Order of the Court of First Instance of 12 September 2008
— Keinhorst v Commission

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by:
J. Currall and H. Krämer, Agents, assisted by B.
Wägenbaur, lawyer)

(Case T-428/03) (1)

(Staff case — Officials — Interlocutory judgment — No need
to adjudicate)

Re:

(2008/C 301/55)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Gerhard Keinhorst (Overijse, Belgium) (represented by:
N. Lhoëst, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented initially by C. Berardis-Kayser and L. Lozano Palacios,
and subsequently by C. Berardis-Kayser and H. Krämer, Agents)

Re:

First, application for annulment of the Commission's decisions
of 23 December 2002 and 14 April 2003 altering the appli-
cant's classification in grade, in so far as they fix his classifica-
tion in step on recruitment in step 1 of Grade A6, fix 5 October
1995 as the date on which the decisions were to have pecuniary
effect and did not re-establish the applicant's career grade, and
an application for annulment of the Commission's decisions of
4 September and 24 November 2003 rejecting the applicant's
complaints and, second, an application for compensation for
the damage allegedly caused.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on this action.

2. The Commission shall pay all the costs.

First, application for annulment of the Commission's decision of
14 April 2003 altering the applicant's classification in grade, in
so far as it fixes his classification in step on recruitment in step 2
of Grade A6, fixes 5 October 1995 as the date on which the
decision was to have pecuniary effect and did not re-establish
the applicant's career grade, and an application for annulment
of the decision rejecting the applicant's complaint and, second,
an application for compensation for
the damage allegedly
caused by that decision.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on this action.

2. The Commission shall pay all the costs.

(1) OJ C 118, 30.4.2004.

Order of the Court of First Instance of 12 September 2008
— Goris v Commission

(1) OJ C 47, 21.2.2004.

(Case T-126/04) (1)

Order of the Court of First Instance of 12 September 2008
— Rousseaux v Commission

(Case T-125/04) (1)

(Staff case — Officials — Interlocutory judgment — No need
to adjudicate)

(2008/C 301/56)

Language of the case: French

(Staff case — Officials — Interlocutory judgment — No need
to adjudicate)

(2008/C 301/57)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Willem Goris (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by:
N. Lhoëst, lawyer)

Parties

Applicant: Patrick Rousseaux (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by:
N. Lhoëst, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by:
J. Currall and H. Krämer, Agents, assisted by B.
Wägenbaur, lawyer)

22.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/35

Re:

Operative part of the order

First, application for annulment of the Commission's decision of
5 May 2003 altering the applicant's classification in grade, in so
far as it fixes his classification in step on recruitment in step 2
of Grade B4, fixes 5 October 1995 as the date on which the
decision was to have pecuniary effect and did not re-establish
the applicant's career grade, and an application for annulment
of the decision rejecting the applicant's complaint and, second,
an application for compensation for
the damage allegedly
caused by that decision.

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on this action.

2. The Commission shall pay all the costs.

(1) OJ C 118, 30.4.2004.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on this action.

2. The Commission shall pay all the costs.

(1) OJ C 118, 30.4.2004.

Order of the Court of First Instance of 12 September 2008
— Tachelet v Commission

(Case T-293/04) (1)

(Staff case — Officials — Interlocutory judgment — No need
to adjudicate)

(2008/C 301/59)

Language of the case: French

Order of the Court of First Instance of 12 September 2008
— Jacobs v Commission

(Case T-131/04) (1)

Parties

(Staff case — Officials — Interlocutory judgment — No need
to adjudicate)

(2008/C 301/58)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Luc Jacobs (Brussels, Belgium)
Lhoëst, lawyer)

(represented by: N.

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by:
J. Currall and H. Krämer, Agents, assisted by B.
Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

First, application for annulment of the Commission's decision of
14 April 2003 altering the applicant's classification in grade, in
so far as it fixes his classification in step on recruitment in step 2
of Grade B4, fixes 5 October 1995 as the date on which the
decision was to have pecuniary effect and did not re-establish
the applicant's career grade, and an application for annulment
of the decision rejecting the applicant's complaint and, second,
an application for compensation for
the damage allegedly
caused by that decision.

Applicant: Guy Tachelet (Rijmenam, Belgium) (represented by: N.
Lhoëst, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: J. Currall and H. Krämer, Agents)

Re:

First, application for annulment of the Commission's decision of
2 September 2003 altering the applicant's classification in
grade, in so far as it fixes his classification in step on recruit-
ment in step 2 of Grade B4 and did not re-establish the appli-
cant's career grade, and an application for annulment of the
decision rejecting the applicant's complaint and, second, an
application for compensation for the damage allegedly caused
by that decision.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on this action.

2. The Commission shall pay all the costs.

(1) OJ C 262, 23.10.2004.