Case F-121/06: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 11 September 2008 — Spee v Europol (Staff case — Members of the Europol staff — Remuneration — Articles 28 and 29 of the Europol Staff Regulations — Incremental points awarded on the basis of an assessment — Retroactive application of rules — Calculation method)
Date: 2008-09-11
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European official, Europol, action by staff, pay, personnel administration, regulations for civil servants

6.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/55

EUROPEAN UNION CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber)
of 9 October 2008 — Nijs v Court of Auditors

(Case F-49/06) (1)

Defendant: European Police Office (Europol)
(represented by:
Urban and D. Neumann and, subsequently, by D. Neumann and
D. El Khoury, Agents, and B. Wägenbaur and R. van der Hout,
lawyers)

(Staff case — Officials — Promotion — 2005 promotion
procedure)

Re:

(2008/C 313/97)

Language of the case: French

Annulment of the Europol decision of 5 July 2006 to grant the
applicant only one of the two incremental points provided for
in Article 29 of the Staff Regulations of Europol.

Parties

Applicant: Bart Nijs (Bereldange, Luxembourg) (represented by:
F. Rollinger, lawyer)

Defendant: Court of Auditors of
(represented by: T. Kennedy,
Agents)

the European Communities
J.-M. Stenier and G. Corstens,

Re:

First, annulment of the decision of the appointing authority not
to promote the applicant to grade A*11 pursuant to the 2005
promotion procedure and, second, a claim for damages.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1. Dismisses the action as partly inadmissible and partly unfounded;

2. Orders Mr Nijs to pay all the costs.

(1) OJ C 154, 1.7.2006, p. 26.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders each party to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 326, 30.12.2006, p. 84.

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber)
of 4 September 2008 — Dragoman v Commission

(Case F-147/06) (1)

(Staff case — Open competition — Non-admission to the oral
test)

(2008/C 313/99)

Language of the case: French

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber)
of 11 September 2008 — Spee v Europol

Parties

(Case F-121/06) (1)

(Staff case — Members of the Europol staff — Remuneration
— Articles 28 and 29 of the Europol Staff Regulations —
Incremental points awarded on the basis of an assessment —
Retroactive application of rules — Calculation method)

Applicant: Adriana Dragoman (Brussels, Belgium)
(represented
by: S. Mihailescu, and, subsequently, by G.-F. Dinulescu, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: K. Herrmann and M. Velardo, Agents)

(2008/C 313/98)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: David Spee (Rijswijk, Netherlands) (represented by: D.
C. Coppens, lawyer)

Re:

Annulment of the decision of the selection board for open
competition EPSO/AD/44/06 CJ, made for the purpose of estab-
lishing a reserve list for the recruitment of Romanian-language
lawyer-linguists, to award the applicant a mark of 18/40 in
written test (b) and not to admit her to the oral test for that
competition