Case C-375/08: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Treviso (Italy) lodged on 18 August 2008 — Criminal proceedings against Luigi Pontini, Emanuele Rech, Dino Bonora, Giovanni Forato, Laura Forato, Adele Adami, Ivo Colomberotto
Date: 2008-08-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Italy, beef, common organisation of markets, financial aid, interpretation of the law, utilised agricultural area

20.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 327/7

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunal de Grande
Instance de Nanterre — Validity of Article 24(2) of Regulation
(EEC) No 1758/81, Article 27(3)
of Regulation (EC)
No 2038/1999, Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 2073/2000,
Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1745/2002 and Article 1 of
Regulation (EC) No 1739/2003 — Common organisation of
the markets in the sugar sector — Isoglucose production quotas
— (Non)
isoglucose used as an intermediate
product — Validity of Regulation (EEC) No 1443/82 and Regu-
lation (EC) No 314/2002 — Method of calculating levies due in
respect of isoglucose production

inclusion of

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di
Treviso (Italy)
lodged on 18 August 2008 — Criminal
proceedings against Luigi Pontini, Emanuele Rech, Dino
Bonora, Giovanni Forato, Laura Forato, Adele Adami, Ivo
Colomberotto

(Case C-375/08)

(2008/C 327/11)

Language of the case: Italian

Operative part of the order

1. Consideration of the first question referred has disclosed no factor of
such a kind as to affect the validity of Article 24(2) of Council
Regulation (EEC) No 1785/81 of 30 June 1981 on the common
organization of the markets in the sugar sector, Article 27(3) of
Council Regulation (EC) No 2038/1999 of 13 September 1999
on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector,
Article 1 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2073/2000 of
29 September 2000 reducing, for the 2000/2001 marketing year,
the guaranteed quantity under the production quotas scheme for the
sugar sector and the presumed maximum supply needs of sugar refi-
neries under the preferential import arrangements, Article 11(2) of
Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the
common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector, Article 1
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1745/2002 of 30 September
2002 reducing, for the 2002/2003 marketing year, the guaran-
teed quantity under the production quotas scheme for the sugar
sector and the presumed maximum supply needs of sugar refineries
under
import arrangements or Article 1 of
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1739/2003 of 30 September
2003 reducing, for the 2003/2004 marketing year, the guaran-
teed quantity under the production quotas for the sugar sector and
refineries under
the presumed maximum supply needs of sugar
preferential imports.

the preferential

2. Consideration of the first subparagraph of Article 5(5) of Commis-
sion Regulation (EEC) No 1443/82 of 8 June 1982 laying down
detailed rules for the application of the quota system in the sugar
sector, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 392/94 of
23 February 1994, and Article 6(4) of Commission Regulation
(EC) No 314/2002 of 20 February 2002 laying down detailed
rules for the application of the quota system in the sugar sector, as
amended, where appropriate, by Commission Regulation (EC)
No 1140/2003 of 27 June 2003 has disclosed no factor of such
a kind as to affect the validity of those provisions.

(1) OJ C 154, 1.7.2006.

Referring court

Tribunale di Treviso

Parties to the main proceedings

Luigi Pontini, Emanuele Rech, Dino Bonora, Giovanni Forato,
Laura Forato, Adele Adami, Ivo Colomberotto

Question referred

The Tribunale makes a reference to the Court of Justice in order
that the latter may make clear what the conditions are for elig-
ibility for premiums for male bovine animals and, in particular,
whether the requirement of use of forage areas is sufficient, irre-
spective of the existence of any valid legal title to make that use
lawful (1).

(1) OJ L 160, p. 21.

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale
Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia (Italy) lodged
on 18 August 2008 — Serrantoni Srl and Consorzio
Stabile Edile Scrl v Comune di Milano

(Case C-376/08)

(2008/C 327/12)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia