do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Communication from the Commission — Appointment of members of the Conciliation Body set up by Commission Regulation (EC) No 885/2006 in the context of the clearance of the accounts of the EAGF and of the EAFRD
Date: 2008-08-06
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU financing, EU office or agency, appointment of staff, closing of accounts, common agricultural policy, fund (EU)

6.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 200/7

Communication from the Commission — Appointment of members of the Conciliation Body set up
by Commission Regulation (EC) No 885/2006 in the context of the clearance of the accounts of the
EAGF and of the EAFRD

(2008/C 200/03)

1. The Commission has appointed as chairman:

Mr Daniel PERRIN (FR) (from 1 August 2008 to 31 July 2011).

2. The Commission has appointed as members:

Ms Concepción SÁNCHEZ TRUJILLANO (ES) (from 1 August 2008 to 31 July 2011),

Mr George TREVELYAN (UK) (from 1 August 2008 to 31 July 2011).

3. The Commission has appointed as substitute members:

Mr Toomas KEVVAI (EE) (with effect from 1 August 2008),

Mr Jaroslaw OLESNIEWICZ (PL) (with effect from 1 August 2008),

Mr Bart BRADY (IE) (with effect from 1 August 2008),

Mr Ian George PEARSON (UK) (with effect from 1 August 2008).
Corrigendum to the Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Kazakhstan, of the other part, extending the provisions of the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement to bilateral trade in textiles, taking account of the expiry of the bilateral textiles Agreement ( OJ L 17, 24.1.2007 )
Date: 2008-08-06
Institutions: European Economic Community, Kazakhstan
Subjects: Kazakhstan, bilateral agreement, cooperation agreement (EU), protocol to an agreement, textile product, trade agreement (EU)

6.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 209/15

CORRIGENDA

Corrigendum to the Protocol
to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European
Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Kazakhstan, of the other part,
extending the provisions of the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement to bilateral trade in textiles, taking
account of the expiry of the bilateral textiles Agreement

(Official Journal of the European Union L 17 of 24 January 2007)

On page 16, Article 3:

for:

read:

This Protocol shall enter into force on the first day of the month following the date of signature.’,

‘Article 3

This Protocol shall enter into force on the first day of the month following the date on which the Parties notify
each other that they have completed the necessary internal procedures in this respect.’;

‘Article 3

on page 16, Article 4:

for:

read:

‘Article 4

This Protocol is drawn up in duplicate in each of the official languages of the contracting parties, each of these texts
being equally authentic.’,

This Protocol is drawn up in duplicate in the Bulgarian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Estonian, Finnish, French,
German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovene, Slovak,
Spanish, Swedish, Kazakh and Russian languages, each of these texts being equally authentic.’

‘Article 4
Case F-67/08: Action brought on 6 August 2008 — Visser-Fornt Raya v Europol
Date: 2008-08-06
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: Europol, action for annulment (EU), full-time employment

8.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 285/55

Action brought on 30 July 2008 — Kipp v Europol

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

(Case F-65/08)

(2008/C 285/98)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Michael Kipp (The Hague, Netherlands) (represented
by: P. de Casparis, lawyer)

the decision of 4 October 2007 by which
Annulment of
Europol informed the applicant that there was no possibility of
offering her a permanent post

Form of order sought

— Annul the decision of 4 October 2007 by which the defen-
dant informed the applicant that there was no possibility of
offering her a permanent post, the decision of 29 April
2008 rejecting the complaint against the earlier decision and
the decision of 12 June 2008, which follows on from that
of 4 October 2007;

Defendant: European Police Office (Europol)

— Order Europol to pay the costs.

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of
the decision of 4 October 2007 by which
Europol informed the applicant that there was no possibility of
offering him a permanent post

Action brought on 6 August 2008 — Sluiter v Europol

Form of order sought

— Annul the decision of 4 October 2007 by which the defen-
dant informed the applicant that there was no possibility of
offering him a permanent post, the decision of 29 April
2008 rejecting the complaint against the earlier decision and
the decision of 12 June 2008, which follows on from that
of 4 October 2007;

— Order Europol to pay the costs.

Parties

(Case F-68/08)

(2008/C 285/100)

Language of the case: Dutch

Action brought on 6 August 2008 — Visser-Fornt Raya v
Europol

(Case F-67/08)

(2008/C 285/99)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Rudolf Sluiter (Hillegom, Netherlands)
by: P. de Casparis, lawyer)

(represented

Defendant: European Police Office (Europol)

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of 4 October 2007 whereby Europol
informed the applicant that there was no possibility of his being
offered a permanent position

Form of order sought

— Annul the decision of 4 October 2007 whereby the defen-
dant informed the applicant that there was no possibility of
his being offered a permanent position, along with the deci-
sion of 29 April 2008 rejecting his complaint brought
against the first decision and the decision of 12 June 2008
in furtherance of that of the 4 October 2007;

Applicant: Maria Teresa Visser-Fornt Raya
Netherlands) (represented by: P. Casparis, lawyer)

(The Hague,

— Order Europol to pay the costs.

Defendant: European Police Office (Europol)
Case F-69/08: Action brought on 6 August 2008 — Knöll v Europol
Date: 2008-08-06
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: Europol, action for annulment (EU), full-time employment

C 285/56

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.11.2008

Action brought on 6 August 2008 — Knöll v Europol

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

(Case F-69/08)

(2008/C 285/101)

Language of the case: Dutch

First,
illegality of Article 5(1)(d) of the General Implementing
Provisions relating to the selection procedure for members of
contract staff under Article 3a and, secondly, annulment of
EPSO's decisions not to include the applicants' names on the list
of successful candidates and in the database for the recruitment
procedure CAST 27/Relex.

Parties

Form of order sought

Applicant: Brigitte Knöll (Hochheim, Germany) (represented by:
P. de Casparis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Police Office (Europol)

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the decision of 4 October 2007,
by which Europol
informed the applicant that there was no
possibility of offering her a permanent post.

Form of order sought

The applicant claims the Tribunal should:

— Annul the decision of 4 October 2007, by which the defen-
dant informed the applicant that there was no possibility of
offering her a permanent post, the decision of 29 April
2008 rejecting the complaint brought against the first deci-
sion and the decision of 12 June 2008 which is part of the
extension of that of 4 October 2007;

— Order Europol to pay the costs.

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

— Declare Article 5(1)(d) of the General Implementing Provi-
sions relating to the selection procedure for members of
contract staff under Article 3a illegal;

— Annul EPSO's decision not to include the applicants' names
on the list of successful candidates and in the database for
the recruitment procedure CAST 27/Relex

— order the Commission of the European Communities to pay

the costs.

Action brought on 18 September 2008 — Behmer v
Parliament

(Case F-76/08)

(2008/C 285/103)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Joachim Behmer (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by:
S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Action brought on 1 September 2008 — Aparicio and
Others v Commission

Defendant: European Parliament

(Case F-75/08)

(2008/C 285/102)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants:
Jorge Aparicio (Antiguo Cuscatlan, Salvador) and
Others (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, E.
Marchal, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision not to promote the applicant to
grade AD 13 in the 2007 promotion procedure

Form of order sought

— annul the decision not to promote the applicant to grade

AD 13 in the 2007 promotion procedure;

— order the European Parliament to pay the costs.
Case F-68/08: Action brought on 6 August 2008 — Sluiter v Europol
Date: 2008-08-06
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: Europol, action for annulment (EU), full-time employment

8.11.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 285/55

Action brought on 30 July 2008 — Kipp v Europol

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

(Case F-65/08)

(2008/C 285/98)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Michael Kipp (The Hague, Netherlands) (represented
by: P. de Casparis, lawyer)

the decision of 4 October 2007 by which
Annulment of
Europol informed the applicant that there was no possibility of
offering her a permanent post

Form of order sought

— Annul the decision of 4 October 2007 by which the defen-
dant informed the applicant that there was no possibility of
offering her a permanent post, the decision of 29 April
2008 rejecting the complaint against the earlier decision and
the decision of 12 June 2008, which follows on from that
of 4 October 2007;

Defendant: European Police Office (Europol)

— Order Europol to pay the costs.

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of
the decision of 4 October 2007 by which
Europol informed the applicant that there was no possibility of
offering him a permanent post

Action brought on 6 August 2008 — Sluiter v Europol

Form of order sought

— Annul the decision of 4 October 2007 by which the defen-
dant informed the applicant that there was no possibility of
offering him a permanent post, the decision of 29 April
2008 rejecting the complaint against the earlier decision and
the decision of 12 June 2008, which follows on from that
of 4 October 2007;

— Order Europol to pay the costs.

Parties

(Case F-68/08)

(2008/C 285/100)

Language of the case: Dutch

Action brought on 6 August 2008 — Visser-Fornt Raya v
Europol

(Case F-67/08)

(2008/C 285/99)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Rudolf Sluiter (Hillegom, Netherlands)
by: P. de Casparis, lawyer)

(represented

Defendant: European Police Office (Europol)

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of 4 October 2007 whereby Europol
informed the applicant that there was no possibility of his being
offered a permanent position

Form of order sought

— Annul the decision of 4 October 2007 whereby the defen-
dant informed the applicant that there was no possibility of
his being offered a permanent position, along with the deci-
sion of 29 April 2008 rejecting his complaint brought
against the first decision and the decision of 12 June 2008
in furtherance of that of the 4 October 2007;

Applicant: Maria Teresa Visser-Fornt Raya
Netherlands) (represented by: P. Casparis, lawyer)

(The Hague,

— Order Europol to pay the costs.

Defendant: European Police Office (Europol)
Commission Regulation (EC) No 787/2008 of 6 August 2008 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2008-08-06
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: agri-monetary policy, citrus fruit, fruit vegetable, grape, import price, pip fruit, stone fruit

7.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 212/1

(Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory)

I

REGULATIONS

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 787/2008

of 6 August 2008

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and
vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Whereas:

Having regard to the Treaty
Community,

establishing the European

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of
22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agri­
cultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agri­
cultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the
outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,
the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values
for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and
periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007
of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for
Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and
(EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in
particular Article 138(1) thereof,

The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regu­
lation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.

This Regulation shall enter into force on 7 August 2008.

Article 2

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 August 2008.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY
Director-General for Agriculture and
Rural Development

(1) OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by
Commission Regulation (EC) No 510/2008 (OJ L 149, 7.6.2008,
p. 61).

(2) OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regu­

lation (EC) No 590/2008 (OJ L 163, 24.6.2008, p. 24).

L 212/2

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

7.8.2008

Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

ANNEX

CN code

0702 00 00

0709 90 70

0805 50 10

0806 10 10

0808 10 80

0808 20 50

0809 20 95

0809 30

0809 40 05

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

(EUR/100 kg)

MK
TR
XS
ZZ

TR
ZZ

AR
CL
US
UY
ZA
ZZ

CL
EG
IL
MK
TR
ZZ

AR
BR
CL
CN
NZ
US
ZA
ZZ

AR
CL
NZ
TR
ZA
ZZ

CA
TR
US
ZZ

TR
US
ZZ

BA
IL
TR
XS
ZZ

29,6
74,2
26,5
43,4

93,7
93,7

77,9
63,1
95,7
65,2
85,2
77,4

57,7
144,2
157,1
68,7
142,2
114,0

87,4
92,2
95,1
84,0
102,0
92,0
81,1
90,5

67,2
84,4
152,7
160,0
95,6
112,0

442,0
545,4
503,5
497,0

166,3
191,9
179,1

66,2
118,3
111,4
62,1
89,5

(1) Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘ZZ’ stands

for ‘of other origin’.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2008-08-06
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate

C 200/6

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

6.8.2008

IV

(Notices)

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND
BODIES

COMMISSION

Euro exchange rates (1)

5 August 2008

(2008/C 200/02)

1 euro =

Currency

Exchange rate

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

JPY

DKK

GBP

SEK

CHF

ISK

NOK

BGN

CZK

EEK

HUF

LTL

LVL

PLN

RON

SKK

US dollar

Japanese yen

Danish krone

Pound sterling

Swedish krona

Swiss franc

Iceland króna

Norwegian krone

Bulgarian lev

Czech koruna

Estonian kroon

Hungarian forint

Lithuanian litas

Latvian lats

Polish zloty

Romanian leu

Slovak koruna

1,5487

TRY

Turkish lira

167,06

AUD Australian dollar

7,4606

0,79285

9,4622

1,6312

CAD

HKD

NZD

SGD

Canadian dollar

Hong Kong dollar

New Zealand dollar

Singapore dollar

1,7882

1,6890

1,6168

12,0873

2,1388

2,1339

122,74

KRW South Korean won

1 575,80

8,0315

1,9558

23,928

15,6466

ZAR

CNY

HRK

IDR

South African rand

Chinese yuan renminbi

Croatian kuna

Indonesian rupiah

235,13

MYR Malaysian ringgit

3,4528

0,7049

3,2159

3,4965

PHP

RUB

THB

BRL

Philippine peso

Russian rouble

Thai baht

Brazilian real

30,375

MXN Mexican peso

11,4340

10,6173

7,2173

14 059,10

5,0666

68,140

36,4325

52,075

2,4308

15,3331

(1) Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5247 — Daiichi Sankyo/Ranbaxy Laboratories) — Candidate case for simplified procedure Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2008-08-06
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, exchange of information, merger control, pharmaceutical industry

C 200/8

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

6.8.2008

V

(Announcements)

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION
POLICY

COMMISSION

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.5247 — Daiichi Sankyo/Ranbaxy Laboratories)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 200/04)

1.
On 30 July 2008, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to
Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Daiichi Sankyo Company,
Limited (‘DS’, Japan) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of
Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited, India (‘Ranbaxy’, India), by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

— for DS: pharmaceutical company,

— for Ranbaxy: pharmaceutical company.

3.
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the
scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to
the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council
Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the
procedure set out in the Notice.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed

4.
operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication.
Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax ((32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under
reference number COMP/M.5247 — Daiichi Sankyo/Ranbaxy Laboratories, to the following address:

European Commission
Directorate-General for Competition
Merger Registry
J-70
B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
(2) OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5275 — Delek Nederland/Salland Olie Holding) — Candidate case for simplified procedure Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2008-08-06
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, exchange of information, merger control, petroleum product, wholesale trade

6.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 200/9

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.5275 — Delek Nederland/Salland Olie Holding)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 200/05)

1.
On 30 July 2008, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to
Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Delek Nederland BV
(‘Delek’, Netherlands) belonging to Delek group acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the
Council Regulation control of the whole of Salland Olie Holding BV (‘Salland’, Netherlands) by way of
purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

— for Delek: wholesale trade, trade (petrol station and transport of petroleum products), and storage in

petroleum products,

— for Salland: wholesale trade and trade (petrol station and transport of petroleum products) in petroleum

products.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the
3.
scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to
the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council
Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the
procedure set out in the Notice.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed

4.
operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication.
Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax ((32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under
reference number COMP/M.5275 — Delek Nederland/Salland Olie Holding, to the following address:

European Commission
Directorate-General for Competition
Merger Registry
J-70
B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
(2) OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.