Case T-37/06: Order of the Court of First Instance of 9 April 2008 — Meggle v OHIM — Clover (HiQ with trefoil) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of opposition — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2008-04-09
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), trade-mark law

7.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/25

Order of the Court of First Instance of 9 April 2008 —
Meggle v OHIM — Clover (HiQ with trefoil)

Re:

(Case T-37/06) (1)

(Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of
opposition — No need to adjudicate)

(2008/C 142/44)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Application for the annulment of the Commission decisions of
10 March and 23 June 2006 refusing to grant the applicant
access
to document SEK(2005) 420 of 22 March 2005,
containing a legal analysis of a draft framework decision, under
discussion in the Council, on the retention of data processed
and stored in connection with the provision of publicly available
electronic communications services or data on public communi-
cations networks for the purpose of prevention, investigation,
detection and prosecution of crime and criminal offences
including terrorism.

Applicant: Meggle AG (Wasserburg, Germany) (represented by: T.
Raab and H. Lauf, lawyers)

Operative part of the order

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market
(Trade Marks and Designs)
J. Weberndörfer,
acting as Agent)

(represented by:

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

2. It is not necessary to rule on the applications to intervene;

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM
intervening before the Court of First Instance: Clover Corporation
Limited (Sydney, Australia)

3. Landtag Schleswig-Holstein shall bear its own costs and pay the
Commission's costs, except those relating to the applications to
intervene;

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of
Appeal of OHIM of 22 November 2005 (Case R 1130/2004-2)
concerning opposition proceedings between Meggle AG and
Clover Corporation Limited

Operative part of the order

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the case.

2. The applicant is ordered to pay the costs.

4. Landtag Schleswig-Holstein,

the Republic of
Finland and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern
Ireland shall bear their own costs in relation to the applications to
intervene.

the Commission,

(1) OJ C 261, 28.10.2006.

(1) OJ C 96, 22.4.2006.

Order of the Court of First Instance of 10 April 2008 —
2K-Teint and Others v Commission and EIB

Order of the Court of First Instance of 3 April 2008 —
Landtag Schleswig-Holstein v Commission

(Case T-236/06) (1)

(Action for annulment — Access to documents — Regional
parliament — Lack of capacity to be a party to legal proceed-
ings — Inadmissibility)

(2008/C 142/45)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Landtag Schleswig-Holstein (Germany)
by: S. Laskowski and J. Caspar)

(represented

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: P. Costa de Oliveira and C. Ladenburger)

(Case T-336/06) (1)

liability — Financing contract concluded
(Non-contractual
with Morocco — EIB's alleged negligence and failures in
monitoring a loan financed by the Community budget —
Limitation — Inadmissibility)

(2008/C 142/46)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: 2K-Teint SARL (Casablanca, Morocco); Mohammed
Kermoudi, Khalid Kermoudi, Laila Kermoudi, Mounia Kermoudi,
Salma Kermoudi and Rabia Kermoudi (Casablanca) (represented
by: P. Thomas, lawyer)

Defendants: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by A. Aresu and V. Joris, Agents) and European Invest-
ment Bank (EIB) (represented by C. Gómez de la Cruz and J.-P.
Minnaert, Agents)