Case C-446/05: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 March 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de Première Instance de Bruxelles (Belgium)) — Criminal proceedings against Ioannis Doulamis (Article 81 EC, read in conjunction with Article 10 EC — National legislation prohibiting advertising of dental care services)
Date: 2008-03-13
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Belgium, EU law - national law, advertising, competition law, dental medicine, interpretation of the law

C 116/2

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

9.5.2008

V

(Announcements)

COURT PROCEEDINGS

COURT OF JUSTICE

Designation of the Chamber responsible for cases of the
kind referred to in Article 104b of the Rules of Procedure
of the Court of Justice

second paragraph of Article 10 EC and Article 3(1)(g) EC —
National legislation prohibiting all advertising in the dental care
sector

(2008/C 116/02)

At its meeting of 12 February 2008, the Court of Justice of the
European Communities, designated, for the period from 1 March
to 6 October 2008, the Third Chamber of the Court as being
the Chamber which,
in accordance with Article 9(1) of the
Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, is to be responsible
for cases of the kind referred to in Article 104b of the Rules.

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 March
2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal
de Première Instance de Bruxelles (Belgium)) — Criminal
proceedings against Ioannis Doulamis

(Case C-446/05) (1)

(Article 81 EC, read in conjunction with Article 10 EC —
legislation prohibiting advertising of dental care
National

services)

(2008/C 116/03)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Tribunal de Première Instance de Bruxelles

Party in the main criminal proceedings

Ioannis Doulamis

Operative part of the judgment

Article 81 EC, read in conjunction with Article 3(1)(g) EC and the
second paragraph of Article 10 EC, does not preclude a national law,
such as the Law of 15 April 1958, which prohibits any person or
dental care providers, in the context of professional services or a dental
surgery, from engaging in advertising of any kind in the dental care
sector.

(1) OJ C 48, 25.2.2006.

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 1 April 2008
— European Parliament (C-14/06), Kingdom of Denmark
(C-295/06) v Commission of the European Communities

(Joined Cases C-14/06 and C-295/06) (1)

(Directive 2002/95/EC — Electrical and electronic equipment
— Restriction of use of certain hazardous substances —
Decabromodiphenyl ether (‘DecaBDE’) — Commission Deci-
sion 2005/717/EC — Exemption of DecaBDE from the prohi-
bition on use — Actions for annulment — Commission's
enabling
implementing powers — Infringement of

the

provision)

(2008/C 116/04)

Languages of the case: English and Danish

Intervening parties: Union des Dentistes et Stomatologistes de
Belgique (UPR), Jean Totolidis

Parties

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunal de Première
Instance de Bruxelles — Interpretation of Article 81 EC, the

Applicants: European Parliament, (represented by: K. Bradley, A.
Neergaard and I. Klavina, Agents)
(C-14/06), Kingdom of
Denmark (represented by: J. Molde, B. Weis Fogh and J. Bering
Liisberg, Agents) (C-295/06)