Case F-30/08: Action brought on 28 February 2008 — Nanopoulos v Commission
Date: 2008-02-28
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European Commission, European civil service, European official, action by staff, fundamental rights, indemnification

C 171/50

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

5.7.2008

EUROPEAN UNION CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL

Action brought on 22 January 2008 — Renier v
Commission

(Case F-8/08)

(2008/C 171/98)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Colette Renier (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S.
Orlandi, J.-N. Louis, A. Coolen and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

The subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the individual decision of 11 April 2007 limiting
the duration of the applicant's contract as a member of the
contract staff
to the period between 16 April 2007 and
15 December 2008 and an application for damages.

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

— annul the Commission's decision of 11 April 2007 inas-
much as it limits the duration of the applicant's contract as
a member of
to the period between
16 April 2007 and 15 December 2008;

the contract staff

— order the defendant to pay the costs.

appointment inasmuch as it did not grant him the expatriation
allowance and, second, an order that the defendant pay the
expatriation allowance and default interest and make good the
non-material damage suffered by the applicant.

Form of order sought

— Annul the decision of the European Parliament of 2 April
2007 fixing the applicant's rights on taking up his appoint-
ment inasmuch as it did not grant him the expatriation
allowance;

— Order the European Parliament to pay to the applicant the
expatriation allowance corresponding to a monthly sum of
16 % of the total amount of basic salary plus household
allowance and dependent child allowance paid to the appli-
cant per month since April 2007 and for all the months
following until payment in full;

— Order payment of default interest on the damages awarded
at 8 % per year since the respective dates on which the sums
fell due until payment in full;

— Order the European Parliament to pay to the applicant the
sum of EUR 10 000 or any other sum, including a higher
one, to compensate for the non-material damage which he
has suffered;

— Order the European Parliament to pay the costs.

Action brought on 28 February 2008 — Nanopoulos v
Commission

Action brought on 5 February 2008 — Nardin v
Parliament

(Case F-12/08)

(2008/C 171/99)

Language of the case: French

Parties

(Case F-30/08)

(2008/C 171/100)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Photius Nanopoulos
(represented by: V. Christianos, lawyer)

(Luxembourg, Luxembourg)

Applicant: Thierry Nardin (Luxembourg, Luxembourg)
sented by: V. Wiot, lawyer)

(repre-

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant: European Parliament

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

First, annulment of the decision of the European Parliament of
2 April 2007 fixing the applicant's rights on taking up his

An order against the Commission to pay to the applicant a sum
to compensate him for the damage suffered as a result of breach
of his fundamental rights to the detriment of his honour and
his reputation.

5.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/51

Form of order sought

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

— Order the Commission to pay to the applicant, by way of
compensation for non-material damage suffered, the sum of
EUR 850 000, which includes compensation for the detri-
ment to his health;

— Order the Commission of the European Communities to

pay the costs.

First, annulment of
the decision of Europol concerning the
assessment of the applicant and the implicit rejection of her
complaint with regard to that assessment, and, second, an order
for Europol to pay damages.

Form of order sought

— Annul the assessment of 25 July 2007 and the implicit deci-
lodged by Ms Bernard on

the complaint

sion to reject
23 October 2007;

Action brought on 14 March 2008 — Pachtitis v
Commission

— Order Europol to pay damages of up to EUR 7 500;

— Order Europol to pay the costs.

(Case F-35/08)

(2008/C 171/101)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Dimitrios Pachtitis (Athens, Greece) (represented by: P.
Giatagantzidis, lawyer)

Action brought on 6 May 2008 — Thoss v Court of
Auditors

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

The subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of EPSO's decision not to allow the applicant to
take the written tests in competition EPSO/AD/77/06 following
the result obtained in the admission tests and annulment of
EPSO's decision rejecting the applicant's request relating to, first,
a review of the decision not to allow him to take the written
tests, and, secondly, a request for some of the competition docu-
ments.

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

— annul the decisions of

the European Personnel Selection
Office ESPO/5000 LM-FR/31.05.2007 and MM./dbD(07)
27442/06.12.2007, and all related measures;

— order the Commission of the European Communities to pay

the costs.

Action brought on 22 April 2008 — Bernard v Europol

(Case F-45/08)

(2008/C 171/102)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

(Case F-46/08)

(2008/C 171/103)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Nicole Thoss (Dommeldange, Luxembourg)
sented by: P. Goergen, lawyer)

(repre-

Defendant: Court of Auditors of the European Communities

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of the Court of Auditors of 20 March
2006 refusing to allocate to the applicant a survivor's pension
following the death of her husband.

Form of order sought

— Annul the decision of the Court of Auditors of 20 March
2006 refusing to allocate to the applicant the survivor's
pension laid down in Article 16(1) of Regulation 2290/77
and the subsequent decision of 28 September 2006;

— Order the Court of Auditors of the European Communities
to allocate to the applicant the survivor's pension laid down
in Article 16(1) of Regulation 2290/77 with retroactive
effect from 1 December 2003;

— Order the Court of Auditors of the European Communities

Applicant: Marjorie Bernard (The Hague, Netherlands)
sented by: P. de Casparis, lawyer)

(repre-

to pay the costs.

Defendant: European Police Office (Europol)