Case F-19/06: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 21 February 2008 — Semeraro v Commission (Staff cases — Officials — Appraisal — Career development report — 2003 appraisal procedure — Article 43 of the Staff Regulations — Obligation to state reasons — Promotion — Attestation procedure)
Date: 2008-02-21
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European Commission, European official, action by staff, professional career, promotion, staff assessment

15.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/69

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber)
of 21 February 2008 — Semeraro v Commission

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: V. Joris and M.Velardo, agents)

(Case F-19/06) (1)

(Staff cases — Officials — Appraisal — Career development
report — 2003 appraisal procedure — Article 43 of the Staff
Regulations — Obligation to state reasons — Promotion —
Attestation procedure)

(2008/C 209/124)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Re:

First, annulment of the applicant's career development report
for 2004 and, secondly, a claim for damages.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

Applicant: Maria Magdalena Semeraro (Brussels, Belgium) (repre-
sented by: L. Vogel, lawyer)

1. dismisses the action;

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: G. Berscheid and M. Velardo, Agents)

2. orders each party to bear its own costs.

Re:

Application for annulment of the Appointing Authority's deci-
sion of 8 November 2005 rejecting the applicant's complaint
against her Career Development Report for 2004

(1) OJ C 143 of 17.6.2006, p. 39.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber)
of 3 April 2008 — Bakema v Commission

1. Annuls Ms Serrano's career development report covering the period

from 1 January to 31 December 2004;

(Case F-68/06) (1)

2. Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay all

the costs.

(Staff case — Contract staff — Classification in grade —
Function group IV — Diploma — Professional experience)

(1) OJ C 108, 6.5.2006, p. 30.

(2008/C 209/126)

Language of the case: English

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber)
of 6 March 2008 — Skareby v Commission

(Case F-46/06) (1)

(Staff case — Officials — Appraisal — Career development
report — 2004 appraisal procedure — Objectives — Obliga-
tion to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment)

Parties

Applicant: Reint J. Bakema (Zuidlaren, Netherlands) (represented
by: L. Rijpkema and A. Kootstra)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: J. Currall and M. Velardo, agents)

(2008/C 209/125)

Language of the case: French

Re:

Parties

Applicant: Carina Skareby (Bichkek, Kirghizistan)
(represented
by: S. Rodrigues and Y. Minatchy, lawyers, then by S. Rodrigues
and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Annulment of the Commission's Decision refusing to reclassify
the applicant from grade 14 to grade 16 in function group IV
and to regard his ‘kandidaatsdiploma’ as attesting to completed
university studies for the purposes of Article 82 of the CEOS
and of Article 2 of
the GPI concerning the procedures
governing the engagement and employment of contract staff by
the Commission