Case F-23/08: Action brought on 18 February 2008 — Di Bucci v Commission
Date: 2008-02-18
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European Commission, European official, action by staff, indemnification, promotion

9.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 116/33

Action brought on 22 February 2008 — Gippini Fournier
v Commission

Action brought on 22 February 2008 — Miguelez Herreras
v Commission

(Case F-21/08)

(2008/C 116/62)

Language of the case: French

(Case F-22/08)

(2008/C 116/63)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Eric Gippini Fournier (Brussels, Belgium) (represented
by: F. Ruggeri Laderchi)

Parties

Applicant: Benedicta Miguelez Herreras
(represented by: M. van der Woude, lawyer)

(Brussels, Belgium)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

The subject-matter and description of the proceedings

The subject-matter and description of the proceedings

First, annulment of
the Commission's decision to award no
priority points to the applicant in the 2003 Promotion proce-
dure, refusing to award ‘DG priority points’ and refusing to
award points for work in the interest of the institution pursuant
to Article 9 of
implementing
the General provisions
Article 45 of the Staff Regulations. Secondly, an order that the
the economic loss
defendant compensate the applicant
which he has suffered and will suffer throughout his career
because of
the delays in his promotions arising from the
contested decision and pay him the sum of EUR 2 500 as
compensation for non-material damage.

for

for

Form of order sought

— Annul the decision to award no priority points to the appli-
cant in the 2003 Promotion procedure, refusing to award
‘DG priority points’ and refusing to award points for work
in the interest of the institution pursuant to Article 9 of the
General provisions for implementing Article 45 of the Staff
Regulations;

— order the defendant to compensate the applicant for the
economic loss which he has
suffer
throughout his career because of the delays in his promo-
tions arising from the contested decision;

suffered and will

— order

the defendant

the sum of
EUR 2 500 as compensation for the non-material damage
suffered;

to pay the applicant

Annulment of the decision of 17 April 2007 in so far as it
awards the applicant no additional priority points and therefore
upholds the award of
two priority points and a total of
23 points in the 2003 Promotion procedure, and an order that
the defendant pay compensation.

Form of order sought

— Annul the decision of 17 April 2007 in so far as it awards
the applicant no additional priority points and therefore
upholds the award of two priority points and a total of
23 points in the 2003 Promotion procedure;

— order the defendant to pay compensation of EUR 5 000;

— order the Commission of the European Communities to pay

the costs.

Action brought on 18 February 2008 — Di Bucci v
Commission

(Case F-23/08)

(2008/C 116/64)

Language of the case: French

Parties

— order the Commission to pay the costs.

Applicant: Vittorio Di Bucci (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by:
M. van der Woude, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

C 116/34

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

9.5.2008

The subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of 11 April 2007 in so far as it
awards the applicant a single additional priority point in the
2003 Promotion procedure, making a total of 2 priority points
and a grand total of 21 points, and an order that the defendant
pay compensation.

Form of order sought

— Annul the decision of 11 April 2007 in so far as it awards
the applicant a single additional priority point in the 2003
Promotion procedure, making a total of 2 priority points
and a grand total of 21 points, and order that the defendant
pay compensation;

— order the defendant to pay damages of EUR 5 000;

— order the Commission of the European Communities to pay

the costs.

Action brought on 22 February 2008 — Wilms v
Commission

(Case F-24/08)

(2008/C 116/65)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Günter Wilms (Brussels, Belgium)
M. van der Woude, lawyer)

(represented by:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

The subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of 17 April 2007 in so far as it
awards the applicant no additional priority points in the 2003
Promotion procedure, making a total of 1 priority point and a
grand total of 19 points, and an order that the defendant pay
compensation.

Form of order sought

— Annul the decision of 17 April 2007 in so far as it awards
the applicant no additional priority points in the 2003
Promotion procedure, making a total of 1 priority point and
a grand total of 19 points;

— order

the defendant

to pay compensation of at

least

EUR 5 000;

— order the Commission of the European Communities to pay

the costs.

Action brought on 22 February 2008 — Valero Jordana v
Commission

(Case F-25/08)

(2008/C 116/66)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Gregorio Valero Jordana (Brussels, Belgium)
sented by: M. van der Woude, lawyer)

(repre-

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of 17 April 2007 inasmuch as does
not award the applicant any additional priority points for the
promotion year 2003.

Form of order sought

— Annul the decision of 17 April 2007 inasmuch as does not
award the applicant any additional priority points for the
promotion year 2003

— Order the defendant to pay damages of EUR 5 000;

— Order the Commission of the European Communities to

pay the costs.

Action brought on 25 February 2008 — Buendía Sierra v
Commission

(Case F-26/08)

(2008/C 116/67)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant:
sented by: M. van der Woude, lawyer)

José Luis Buendía Sierra (Brussels, Belgium)

(repre-

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

The subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of 11 April 2007 in so far as it
awards the applicant a single additional priority point in the
two priority
2003 Promotion procedure, making a total of
points and a grand total of 21 points and implicitly refusing his
promotion in the 2003 Promotion procedure, and an order that
the defendant pay compensation.