do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case F-80/06: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 25 January 2008 — Duyster v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Parental leave — Application to withdraw parental leave — Lis pendens — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2008-01-25
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European Commission, European official, action by staff, parental leave, regulations for civil servants

29.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/35

EUROPEAN UNION CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of
25 January 2008 — Duyster v Commission

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of
1 February 2008 — Kay Labate v Commission of the
European Communities

(Case F-80/06) (1)

(Case F-77/07) (1)

(Civil Service — Officials — Parental leave — Application to
leave — Lis pendens — Manifest
withdraw parental

inadmissibility)

(2008/C 79/66)

Language of the case: Dutch

(Staff cases — Officials — Social security — Insurance
against the risk of accident and occupational disease — Occu-
pational disease — Lung cancer — Passive smoking — No
need to adjudicate)

(2008/C 79/67)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

of
Applicant:
Luxembourg) (represented by: W. van den Muijsenbergh, lawyer)

(Oetrange, Grand Duchy

Tineke Duyster

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: H. Krämer, acting as Agent, and M. van der Woude,
lawyer)

Re:

the Appointing Authority's

decision of
Annulment of
22 December 2005 declaring inadmissible the applicant's
request of 6 December 2005 concerning the Appointing
Authority's decision of 17 November 2005 on the date that the
applicant's parental leave started

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

Applicant: Kay Labate (Tarquinia,
Forrester, QC)

Italy)

(represented by:

I.

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Re:

Annulment of the Commission decisions of 6 October 2006
and 18 October 2004 not to recognise the cancer which led to
the death of the applicant's husband as being an occupational
disease caused by passive smoking

Operative part of the order

1. There is no further need to adjudicate on the form of order sought

by Mrs Labate in her application.

2. The claims for compensation submitted in the letter of 25 October

2007 by Mrs Labate are dismissed as manifestly unfounded.

2. Each party is ordered to bear its own costs.

3. The Commission of the European Communities is ordered to pay

the costs.

(1) OJ C 261, 28.10.2006, p. 33.

(1) OJ C 233 22.9.2007, p. 22.
Summary of Community decisions on marketing authorizations in respect of medicinal products from 1 December 2007 to 31 December 2007 (Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council )
Date: 2008-01-25
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU Member State, market approval, marketing standard, medicinal product, pharmaceutical legislation

C 19/12

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

25.1.2008

Summary of Community decisions on marketing authorizations in respect of medicinal products
from 1 December 2007 to 31 December 2007

(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1)
or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (2))

(2008/C 19/05)

— Issuing, maintenance or modification of a national marketing authorisation

Date of the
decision

Name(s) of the
medicinal
product

18.12.2007

Tracleer

18.12.2007

Silapo

18.12.2007

Retacrit

19.12.2007

MabCampath

Holder(s) of the marketing
authorization

Member State concerned

Date of
notification

Actelion Registration Ltd
BSI Building 13th Floor
389 Chiswick High Road
London W4 4AL
United Kingdom

STADA Arzneimittel AG
Stadastraße 2-18
D-61118 Bad Vilbel

HOSPIRA Enterprises B.V.
Taurusavenue 19-21b
2132 LS Hoofddorp
Nederland

Genzyme Europe B.V.
Gooimeer 10
1411 DD Naarden
Nederland

This Decision is addressed to
the Member States

19.12.2007

This Decision is addressed to
the Member States

19.12.2007

This Decision is addressed to
the Member States

19.12.2007

This Decision is addressed to
the Member States

20.12.2007

(1) OJ L 311, 28.11.2001, p. 67.
(2) OJ L 311, 28.11.2001, p. 1.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.5015 — Sagard/BPEF/Fläkt Woods JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2008-01-25
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: air conditioning, economic concentration, exchange of information, financial institution, insurance, investment, management, merger control, provision of services

25.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/21

V

(Announcements)

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION
POLICY

COMMISSION

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.5015 — Sagard/BPEF/Fläkt Woods JV)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 19/10)

1.
On 11 January 2008, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to
Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Sagard SAS (‘Sagard’,
France) belonging to the Power Corporation of Canada Group (‘PCC’, Canada) and Barclays Private Equity
France SAS (‘BPEF’, France) indirectly owned by Barclays Bank plc (‘Barclays’, United Kingdom) acquire
within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation joint control of the whole of the under-
taking Fläkt Woods (Luxembourg) SARL (‘Fläkt Woods’, Luxembourg) by way of a new shareholders agree-
ment to be entered into by Sagard and BPEF.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned and the groups to which they belong are:

— for PCC: insurance services, financial services, communication services, technology and biotechnology,

— for Sagard: management of investment funds,

— for Barclays: financial services,

— for BPEF: management of investment funds,

— for Fläkt Woods: manufacture of air ventilation and air handling systems, and air movement systems.

3.
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the
scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to
the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council
Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the
procedure set out in the Notice.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed

4.
operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication.
Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax ((32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under
reference number COMP/M.5015 — Sagard/BPEF/Fläkt Woods JV, to the following address:

European Commission
Directorate-General for Competition
Merger Registry
J-70
B-1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

(1) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
(2) OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.
Case F-11/08: Action brought on 25 January 2008 — Jörg Mölling v Europol
Date: 2008-01-25
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European official, Europol, action by staff, appointment of staff

12.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/51

Action brought on 25 January 2008 — Jörg Mölling v
Europol

The subject-matter and description of the proceedings

(Case F-11/08)

(2008/C 92/104)

the decision of

Annulment of
the EPSO/AST/7/05 selection
board to award to the applicant a mark which was insufficient
for entry on the reserve list.

Language of the case: Dutch

Form of order sought

Parties

— Annul the decision of the EPSO/AST/7/05 selection board
awarding to the applicant a mark which was insufficient for
entry on the list of successful candidates;

— Order the Commission of the European Communities to

Applicant:
by: P. de Casparis, lawyer)

Jörg Mölling (The Hague, Netherlands)

(represented

pay the costs.

Defendant: Europol

The subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of Europol's decision of 10 October 2007 refusing
the applicant permission to participate in the selection proce-
dure for the position of ‘first officer’ in the drugs unit and the
decision of 23 October 2007 rejecting his complaint.

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

— annul Europol's decision of 10 October 2007 refusing him
permission to participate in the selection procedure for the
position of ‘first officer’ in the drugs unit and the decision
of 23 October 2007 rejecting his complaint;

— order Europol to pay the costs.

Action brought on 8 February 2008 — Wiame v
Commission

(Case F-15/08)

(2008/C 92/105)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Valérie Wiame (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S.
Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Action brought on 18 February 2008 — Ritto v
Commission

(Case F-18/08)

(2008/C 92/106)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Luis Ritto (Rome, Italy) (represented by: J. Deliens and
C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

The subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the appointing authority's decision of 14 May
2007 cancelling the applicant's household allowance as from
1 September 2001 and claiming recovery of the sums overpaid
since that date, and annulment of all the decisions stemming
from it.

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

— annul the appointing authority's decision of 14 May 2007

and all decisions stemming from it;

— annul as far as necessary the appointing authority's decision

rejecting the applicant's complaint;

— order the Commission of the European Communities to pay

the costs.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 64/2008 of 25 January 2008 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2008-01-25
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: agri-monetary policy, citrus fruit, fruit vegetable, import price, perennial vegetable, pip fruit

26.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 23/7

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 64/2008

of 25 January 2008

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and
vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty
Community,

establishing the European

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007
of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules of
Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and
(EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (1), and in
particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

the standard values for imports from third countries, in
respect of the products and periods stipulated in the
Annex thereto.

(2)

In compliance with the above criteria,
the standard
import values must be fixed at the levels set out in the
Annex to this Regulation,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regu-
lation (EC) No 1580/2007 shall be fixed as indicated in the
Annex hereto.

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to
the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade
negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes

This Regulation shall enter into force on 26 January 2008.

Article 2

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 January 2008.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY
Director-General for Agriculture and
Rural Development

(1) OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.

L 23/8

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

26.1.2008

to Commission Regulation of 25 January 2008 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry
price of certain fruit and vegetables

ANNEX

CN code

0702 00 00

0707 00 05

0709 90 70

0709 90 80

0805 10 20

0805 20 10

0805 20 30, 0805 20 50, 0805 20 70,
0805 20 90

0805 50 10

0808 10 80

0808 20 50

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

(EUR/100 kg)

IL
MA
TN
TR
ZZ

JO
TR
ZZ

MA
TR
ZZ

EG
ZZ

EG
IL
MA
TN
TR
ZZ

MA
TR
ZZ

CN
IL
MA
PK
TR
ZZ

BR
EG
IL
TR
ZZ

CA
CL
CN
MK
US
ZA
ZZ

CL
CN
TR
US
ZA
ZZ

154,9
48,2
132,6
89,0
106,2

178,8
125,6
152,2

90,6
146,7
118,7

82,9
82,9

45,4
50,4
64,8
55,4
82,3
59,7

104,5
93,6
99,1

84,0
70,0
152,6
48,1
81,8
87,3

72,8
74,2
120,2
123,9
97,8

87,8
60,8
83,6
35,5
107,2
60,7
72,6

59,3
99,5
116,7
112,4
85,9
94,8

(1) Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘ZZ’ stands for ‘of

other origin’.