Case C-532/06: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 24 January 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Simvoulio tis Epikratias, Greece) — Emm. G. Lianakis AE, Sima Anonymi Techniki Etairia Meleton kai Epivlepseon, Nikolaos Vlachopoulos v Dimos Alexandroupolis, Planitiki AE, Aikaterini Georgoula, Dimitrios Vasios, N. Loukatos kai Synergates AE Meleton, Eratosthenis Meletitiki AE, A. Pantazis — Pan. Kyriopoulos kai syn/tes OS Filon OE, Nikolaos Sideris (Directive 92/50/EEC — Public service contracts — Carrying out of a project in respect of the cadastre, town plan and implementing measure for a residential area — Criteria which may be accepted as criteria for qualitative selection or award criteria — Economically most advantageous tender — Compliance with the award criteria set out in the contract documents or contract notice — Subsequent determination of weighting factors and sub-criteria in respect of the award criteria referred to in the contract documents or contract notice — Principle of equal treatment of economic operators and obligation of transparency)
Date: 2008-01-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: award of contract, interpretation of the law, public contract, services contract

8.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/11

Defendant: Republic of Finland (represented by: A. Guimaraes-
Purokoski, Agent)

Re:

electronic

Failure to fulfil obligations under Article 8(1), (2)(b) and 3(c) of
Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the
Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework
for
services
(OJ 2002 L 108, p. 33) and under Article 8(1) and (4) of Direc-
tive 2002/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
of 7 March 2002 on access to, and interconnection of, elec-
tronic
and associated facilities
(‘Access’ Directive) (OJ 2002 L 108, p. 7)

communications networks

communications

networks

and

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders the Commission of

the European Communities and the

Republic of France to bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 294, 2.12.2006.

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 24 January 2008
(reference for a preliminary ruling from the Simvoulio tis
Epikratias, Greece) — Emm. G. Lianakis AE, Sima Anonymi
Techniki Etairia Meleton kai
Epivlepseon, Nikolaos
Vlachopoulos v Dimos Alexandroupolis, Planitiki AE,
Aikaterini Georgoula, Dimitrios Vasios, N. Loukatos kai
Synergates AE Meleton, Eratosthenis Meletitiki AE, A.
Pantazis — Pan. Kyriopoulos kai syn/tes OS Filon OE,
Nikolaos Sideris

(Case C-532/06) (1)

(Directive 92/50/EEC — Public service contracts — Carrying
out of a project in respect of the cadastre, town plan and
implementing measure for a residential area — Criteria which
may be accepted as ‘criteria for qualitative selection’ or ‘award
criteria’ — Economically most advantageous
tender —
Compliance with the award criteria set out in the contract
documents or contract notice — Subsequent determination of
weighting factors and sub-criteria in respect of the award
criteria referred to in the contract documents or contract
notice — Principle of equal treatment of economic operators
and obligation of transparency)

(2008/C 64/15)

Language of the case: Greek

Referring court

Simvoulio tis Epikratias

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Emm. G. Lianakis AE, Sima Anonymi Techniki Etairia
Meleton kai Epivlepseon, Nikolaos Vlachopoulos

Defendants: Dimos Alexandroupolis, Planitiki AE, Aikaterini
Georgoula, Dimitrios Vasios, N. Loukatos kai Synergates AE
Meleton, Eratosthenis Meletitiki AE, A. Pantazis — Pan. Kyrio-
poulos kai syn/tes OS Filon OE, Nikolaos Sideris

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Simvoulio tis Epikratias —
Interpretation of Article 36 of Council Directive 92/50/EEC of
18 June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures for the
award of public service contracts (OJ 1992 L 209, p. 1) —
Criteria for awarding contract — Subsequent
the
specific weighting for each criterion when the award procedure
was already under way

fixing of

Operative part of the judgment

Read in the light of the principle of equal treatment of economic opera-
tors and the ensuing obligation of
transparency, Article 36(2) of
Council Directive 92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordi-
the award of public service contracts, as
nation of procedures for
amended by European Parliament and Council Directive 97/52/EC of
13 October 1997, precludes the contracting authority in a tendering
procedure from stipulating at a later date the weighting factors and
sub-criteria to be applied to the award criteria referred to in the
contract documents or contract notice.

(1) OJ C 56, 10.3.2007.

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 January 2008
(reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassa-
tion (France)) — Paul Chevassus-Marche v Groupe Danone,
Société Kro beer brands SA (BKSA), Société Evian eaux
minérales d'Evian SA (SAEME)

(Case C-19/07) (1)

(Approximation of
laws — Directive 86/653/EEC —
Self-employed commercial agents — Right of an agent
entrusted with a specific geographical area to a commission
— Transactions concluded without any action on the part of
the principal)

(2008/C 64/16)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Paul Chevassus-Marche