Case F-7/08: Action brought on 14 January 2008 — Schönberger v Parliament
Date: 2008-01-14
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European Parliament, action by staff, professional career, promotion, regulations for civil servants

8.3.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/69

Form of order sought

— Annulment of

the note dated 15 February 2007, prot.

RELEX.K7/PL/dgD(2007)502497;

— annulment of the defendant's decision, however formulated,
rejecting the request of 27 January 2007 submitted by the
applicant to the appointing authority;

— annulment, so far as may be necessary, of

the decision,
however formulated, rejecting the complaint of 26 May
appointing
2007 submitted by the
authority;

applicant

to the

— an order that the defendant should indemnify the applicant
for the damage caused by the measures whose annulment is
sought in the sum of EUR 1 000 or such greater or lesser
sum as the Court of First Instance may think fit;

which it declared the reserve list for EPSO Competition
AD/26/05 void;

— In the alternative, annul the defendant's decision of 10 May
2007, and its decision of 2 October 2007 rejecting the
complaint and order the defendant to place the applicant on
EPSO reserve list AD/26/05;

— In the further alternative, annul the defendant's decision of
10 May 2007, and its decision of 2 October 2007 rejecting
the complaint and order the defendant to fix a new date,
with adequate preparation time, for the applicant to take the
oral test and to asses the possibility of his being placed on
the reserve list on the basis of appropriate criteria;

— Order the defendant to state the grounds for its decision of
10 May 2007 and to permit the minutes of the oral test
held on 6 March 2007 to be examined;

— an order that the defendant should pay the costs.

— Order the defendant to pay the costs;

— As a precautionary measure, deliver judgment in default.

Action brought on 10 January 2008 — Brune v
Commission

(Case F-5/08)

(2008/C 64/113)

Language of the case: German

Action brought on 14 January 2008 — Schönberger v
Parliament

(Case F-7/08)

(2008/C 64/114)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Markus Brune (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: H.
Mannes, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Parties

The subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Applicant: Peter Schönberger (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (repre-
sented by: O. Mader, lawyer)

Annulment of the defendant's decision not to place the appli-
cant on the reserve list for EPSO Competition AD/26/05 by
reason of his obtaining an inadequate number of points.

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

— Annul the defendant's decision of 10 May 2007, and its
in
decision of 2 October 2007 rejecting the complaint,

Annulment of the Parliament's decision not to award the appli-
cant a third service point in the context of his periodical report
for 2003.

The subject-matter and description of the proceedings

C 64/70

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.3.2008

Form of order sought

— Annul the defendant's decision of 15 January 2007 not to
award the applicant a third service point in the context of
his periodical report for 2003 and its decision of 16 October
2007 rejecting the applicant's complaint against the decision
of 15 January 2007;

— Order the defendant to pay the costs.

— Order the defendant to place the applicant in financial posi-
tion in which he would have been if he had been correctly
classified;

— Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Action brought on 21 January 2008 — Aayhan and Others
v European Parliament

Action brought on 18 January 2008 — Rosenbaum v
Commission

(Case F-9/08)

(2008/C 64/115)

Language of the case: German

Parties

(Case F-10/08)

(2008/C 64/116)

Language of the case: French

Applicants: Laleh Aayhan (Strasbourg, France) and Others (repre-
sented by: R. Blindauer, lawyer)

Parties

Defendant: European Parliament

Applicant: Eckehard Rosenbaum (Bonn, Germany) (represented
by: H.-J. Rüber, lawyer)

The subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Annulment of the European Parliament's decision of 25 October
2007 rejecting the complaint brought by the applicants on 21
June 2007 for the purpose of having all the fixed-term contracts
between them and the Parliament converted into a single
contract for an indefinite period.

The subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the defendant's decision to classify the applicant
in Grade AD 6/2 at the time of recruitment.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

— Annul the decision of the Appointing Authority of the Euro-
pean Commission of 13 February 2007 concerning the
applicant's classification in Grade AD 6/2;

— Declare that the recruitment must be made in Grade AD 9;

— In the alternative, declare that the recruitment must be made

in Grade AD 8;

— In the further alternative, declare that the recruitment must

be made in Grade AD 8;

— Annul the decision of the Secretary General of the European
Parliament, the Appointing Authority, of 25 October 2007
expressly rejecting the complaint lodged with the Parliament
on 27 June 2007;

— Consider all the fixed-term contracts between the applicants
and the European Parliament as a single contract for an
indefinite period, continuing in effect beyond 1 January
2007;

— Re-employ all the applicant members of staff on the basis of
contracts for an indefinite period with the European Parlia-
ment;

— Grant each applicant member of staff an indemnity in
respect of all the periods worked since the beginning of
their employment equivalent to the right to paid leave which
they have acquired through their work;