Proposal for a Council Regulation on the tests of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II)
Date: 2007-12-20
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Schengen Information System, data processing, exchange of information, public safety, technical standard, testing

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES 

Brussels, 20.12.2007 
COM(2007) 838 final 

Proposal for a 

COUNCIL REGULATION 

on the tests of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II)  

(presented by the Commission) 

EN 

   EN 

 
 
 
  
EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM 

1)  CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL 

•  Grounds for and objectives of the proposal 

The Council entrusted the Commission with the development of the second generation 
Schengen Information System (SIS II) by Regulation (EC) No 2424/2001 and Decision 
2001/886/JHA.  

The  objective  of  this  proposal,  and  a  proposal  for  a  Council  Decision  on  the  same 
subject, is to lay down provisions on the tests to demonstrate that SIS II can work in 
accordance  with  the  technical  and  functional  requirements  set  out  in  the  SIS  II  legal 
instruments  and  the  non-functional  requirements  such  as  robustness,  availability  and 
performance. 

•  General context 
On the basis of two legal instruments1 governing the development of the SIS II, draft 
measures were taken following the regulatory procedure referred to in Article 5(3) of 
Council  Decision  1999/468/EC,  laying  down  the  procedures  for  the  exercise  of 
implementing powers conferred on the Commission: 

"Article  4  The  measures  necessary  for  the  development  of  SIS  II  concerning  the 
following matters shall be taken in accordance with the regulatory procedure: 

(c) technical  aspects which  have  serious financial implications for the budgets of the 
Member States or which have serious technical implications for the national systems of 
the Member States". 

There are very few elements of an information technology project which are as costly 
and time-consuming as testing.  The testing of SIS II is a major technical aspect with 
serious  cost  and  technical  implications  for  the  Member  States.  The  Commission  was 
therefore  obliged  to  propose  comitology  decisions  in  accordance  with  the  regulatory 
procedure.  

Since  the  proposed  test  decisions  did  not  receive  a  favourable  opinion  in  the  SIS  II 
comitology Committee, the Commission has to submit to the Council without delay, a 
proposal relating to measures to be taken and inform the European Parliament. 

•  Existing provisions in the area of the proposal 

- Council Regulation (EC) No 2424/2001 of 6 December 2001 on the development of 
the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) as amended by 1988/2006 
of 21 December 2006; 

-  Council  Decision  2001/886/JHA  of  6  December  2001  on  the  development  of  the 

1 

Council  Regulation  (EC)  No  2424/2001  of  6  December  2001  on  the  development  of  the  second 
generation  of  the  Schengen  Information  System  (SIS  II),  and  Council  Decision  2001/886/JHA  of  6 
December 2001 on the development of the second generation of the Schengen Information System (SIS 
II),  amended  respectively  by  Council  Regulation  (EC)  No  1988/2006  and  Council  Decision 
2006/1007/JHA. 

EN 

2 

   EN 

 
 
 
                                                 
second  generation  Schengen  Information  System  (SIS  II)  as  amended  by  Council 
Decision 2006/1007/JHA; 

- Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 
December  2006  on  the  establishment,  operation  and  use  of  the  second  generation 
Schengen Information System (SIS II); 

- Council Decision 2007/533/JHA of 12 June 2007 on the establishment, operation and 
use of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II);  

- Regulation (EC) No 1986/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 
December  2006  regarding  access  to  the  Second  Generation  Schengen  Information 
System  (SIS  II)  by  the  services  in  the  Member  States  responsible  for  issuing  vehicle 
registration certificates;  

-  Commission  Decisions  2007/170/EC  and  2007/171/EC  of  16  March  2007 
laying down the network requirements for the Schengen Information System. 

•  Consistency with the other policies and objectives of the Union 

Not applicable. 

2)  CONSULTATION OF INTERESTED PARTIES AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT 

•  Consultation of interested parties 

Consultation methods, main sectors targeted and general profile of respondents 

Presidency  of  the  Council  and  Member  States  representatives  were  consulted 
within the framework of the SIS II Committee.  

Following the unfavourable opinion of the SIS II Committee, discussion with the 
current  and  incoming  Presidency  as  well  as  with  Member  States  invited  by  the 
current Presidency has taken place.  

Summary of responses and how they have been taken into account 

When  submitting  this  proposal  the  Commission  has  taken  into  account  the 
outcome  of  the  discussions  with  the  Presidency  as  well  as  with  other  Member 
States invited by the Presidency.  

•  Collection and use of expertise 

Member  States'  experts  were  consulted  extensively  and  three  rounds  of  written 
comments  were  organised.  Agreed  changes  have  been  incorporated  in  the 
documents. 

Following an unfavourable opinion of the SIS II Committee, the Commission has 
modified its proposal to better address the concerns of Member States.  

•  Impact assessment 

An impact assessment is not required for this proposal for a Council Regulation which 

EN 

3 

   EN 

 
 
 
is not included in the 2007 Work Programme of the Commission. The submission of 
this proposal  follows from the  provisions laid down in Article 5  of Council Decision 
1999/468/EC  laying  down  the  procedures  for  the  exercise  of  implementing  powers 
conferred on the Commission. 

3)  LEGAL ELEMENTS OF THE PROPOSAL 

•  Summary of the proposed action 

The  objective  of  the  proposal  is  to  lay  down  the  way  in  which  SIS  II  tests  are 
conducted in order to assess whether SIS II can work in accordance with the technical 
and functional requirements as defined in the SIS II legal instruments as well as with 
the non-functional requirements such as robustness, availability and performance.  

•  Legal basis 
The draft Regulation has its legal basis in Council Regulation (EC) No 2424/20012 on 
the development of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II), and 
in particular Article 4(c) and Article 5(3) thereof.  

•  Subsidiarity principle 

The  objective  of  the  proposed  action,  namely  to  lay  down  provisions  on  SIS  II  tests, 
cannot be achieved by the Member States individually.  

The  SIS  II  is  necessary  for  the  implementation  of  common  policies  of  the  European 
Union. 

The proposals, therefore, comply with the subsidiarity principle. 

•  Proportionality principle 

The  proposal  complies  with  the  proportionality  principle  because  Member  States  are 
competent as regards the implementation of the SIS II national systems. 

•  Choice of instruments 

Proposed instruments: a Council Regulation and a Council Decision for the purposes of 
matters falling within the Treaty establishing the European Community and the Treaty 
on European Union, respectively. 

Since  a  Regulation  shall  be  binding  in  its  entirety  and  directly  applicable  in  the 
Member  States  in  accordance  with  the  Treaty  establishing  the  European  Community 
other legal instruments would not be adequate to achieve the objective.  

2 

OJ L 328, 13.12.2001, p.4 

EN 

4 

   EN 

 
 
 
 
                                                 
4)  BUDGETARY IMPLICATION 

Completion of the SIS II tests will not require additional financial resources other than 
those already foreseen in the PDB (Preliminary Draft Budget) 2008. 

EN 

5 

   EN 

 
 
Proposal for a 

COUNCIL REGULATION 

on the tests of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II)  

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, 

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,  
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2424/20013 on the development of the second 
generation  Schengen  Information  System  (SIS  II),  and  in  particular  Article  4(c)  and  Article 
5(3) thereof, 
Having regard to the proposal from the Commission4, 

Whereas: 

(1) 

(2) 

(3) 

(4) 

(5) 

The development of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) has 
been  entrusted  to  the  Commission  pursuant  to  Council  Regulation  (EC)  No 
2424/20015  and  Council  Decision  2001/886/JHA6  of  6  December  2001  on  the 
development  of  the  second  generation  Schengen  Information  System  (SIS  II).  The 
network requirements for SIS II development are established by Commission Decision 
2007/170/EC7 and by Commission Decision 2007/171/EC8.  

The second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) has been established by 
Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council9 and by 
Council  Decision  2007/533/JHA  of  12  June  200710  on  the  establishment,  operation 
and use of the second generation Schengen Information System. 

It  is  necessary  to  conduct  tests  in  order  to  assess  whether  SIS  II  can  work  in 
accordance  with  the  technical  and  functional  requirements  as  defined  in  the  SIS  II 
legal instruments.  

Tests  should  also  assess  non-functional  requirements  such  as  robustness,  availability 
and performance. 

It is necessary for the Commission to test that the Central SIS II can be connected to 
the national systems of the Member States whereas Member States participating in SIS 
1+  should  make  the  necessary  technical  arrangements  to  process  SIS  II  data  and 
exchange supplementary information.  

(6) 

It  is  necessary  to  clarify  further  the  tasks  to  be  performed  with  regard  to  the 
completion of the SIS II tests by the Commission and the Member States.  

3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 

OJ L 328, 13.12.2001, p.4 
OJ C , , p. . 
OJ L 328, 13.12.2001, p.4. 
OJ L 328, 13.12.2001, p. 1. 
OJ L 79, 20.03.2007, p.20.  
OJ L 79, 20.03.2007, p.29. 
OJ L 381, 28.12.2006, p. 4 
OJ L 205, 7.08.2007, p. 63. 

EN 

6 

   EN 

 
                                                 
(7) 

(8) 

(9) 

It  is  necessary  to  set  out  the  requirements  for  the  definition,  development  and 
application of the test specifications and how the tests shall be validated.  

The  Committee  assisting  the  Commission  during  the  development,  referred  to  in 
Article 5 of Council Regulation No 2424/2001, has not delivered a favourable opinion 
on the draft measures of the Commission in implementation of Article 4 (c) of Council 
Regulation No 2424/2001. In accordance with Article 5(3) of Council Regulation No 
2424/2001 read in conjunction with Article 5(6) of Council Decision of 28 June 1999 
laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the 
Commission  (1999/468/EC)11,  the  Commission  therefore  submitted  to  the  Council  a 
proposal relating to the measures to be taken and informed the European Parliament. 

In  accordance  with  Articles  1  and  2  of  the  Protocol  on  the  position  of  Denmark 
annexed  to  the  Treaty  on  European  Union  and  the  Treaty  establishing  the  European 
Community, Denmark does not take part in the adoption of this Regulation and is not 
bound  by  it  or  subject  to  its  application.  Given  that  this  Regulation  builds  upon  the 
Schengen  acquis  under  the  provisions  of  Title  IV  of  Part  Three  of  the  EC  Treaty, 
Denmark  shall,  in  accordance  with  Article  5  of  the  said  Protocol,  decide,  within  a 
period of six months after the adoption of this Regulation, whether it will implement it 
in its national law. 

(10)  This  Regulation  constitutes  a  development  of  provisions  of  the  Schengen  acquis  in 
which  the  United  Kingdom  does  not  take  part,  in  accordance  with  Council  Decision 
2000/365/EC of 29 May 2000 concerning the request of the United Kingdom of Great 
Britain  and  Northern  Ireland  to  take  part  in  some  of  the  provisions  of  the  Schengen 
acquis12;  the  United  Kingdom  is  therefore  not  taking  part  in  its  adoption  and  is  not 
bound by it or subject to its application. 

(11)  This  Regulation  constitutes  a  development  of  provisions  of  the  Schengen  acquis  in 
which Ireland does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2002/192/EC of 
28 February 2002 concerning Ireland's request to take part in some of the provisions of 
the  Schengen  acquis13;  Ireland  is  therefore  not  taking  part  in  its  adoption  and  is  not 
bound by it or subject to its application. 

(12)  This  Regulation  is  without  prejudice  to  the  arrangements  for  the  United  Kingdom's 
and Ireland's partial participation in the Schengen acquis as respectively defined by the 
Council Decision 2000/365/EC of 29 May 200014 and Council Decision 2002/192/EC 
of 28 February 200215. 

(13)  This  Regulation  constitutes  an  act  building  on  the  Schengen  acquis  or  otherwise 

related to it within the meaning of Article 4(2) of the 2005 Act of Accession. 

(14)  As  regards  Iceland  and  Norway,  this  Regulation  constitutes  a  development  of 
provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement concluded by 
the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of 
Norway  concerning  the  association  of  those  two  States  with  the  implementation, 

11 

12 
13 
14 
15 

OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p. 23, Decision as amended by Decision 2006/512/EC (OJ L 200, 22.7.2006, p. 
11) 
OJ L 131, 1.6.2000, p. 43. 
OJ L 64, 7.3.2002, p. 20. 
OJ L 131, 1.6.2000, p.43. 
OJ L 64, 7.3.2002, p.20. 

EN 

7 

   EN 

 
                                                 
application  and  development  of  the  Schengen  acquis16,  which  fall  within  the  area 
referred to in Article 1, point G of Council Decision 1999/437/EC of 17 May 1999 on 
certain arrangements for the application of that Agreement. 

(15)  As regards Switzerland, this Regulation constitutes a development of the provisions of 
the  Schengen  acquis  within  the  meaning  of  the  Agreement  signed  between  the 
European  Union,  the  European  Community  and  the  Swiss  Confederation  concerning 
the  association  of  the  Swiss  Confederation  with  the  implementation,  application  and 
development of the Schengen acquis, which falls within the area referred to in Article 
1, point G of Council Decision 1999/437/EC read in conjunction with Article 4 (1) of 
Council Decision 2004/860/EC on the signing, on behalf of the European Community 
and on the provisional application of certain provisions of that Agreement17. 

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: 

The  specifications  relevant  to  the  SIS  II  tests,  in  particular  their  scope  and  objectives,  their 
requirements and their process shall be as set out in the Annex. 

Article 1 

Article 2 

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official 
Journal of the European Union. 

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in the Member States in 
accordance with the Treaty establishing the European Community. 

Done at Brussels,  

For the Council 
The President 

16 
17 

OJ L 176, 10.7.1999, p.31. 
OJ L 370, 17.12.2004, p.78. 

EN 

8 

   EN 

 
 
 
 
 
                                                 
ANNEX  

1. 

SCOPE OF SIS II TESTS 

The  SIS  II  tests  shall  demonstrate  that  SIS  II  Central  System  (CS-SIS),  the  SIS  II 
Communication Infrastructure and the interface towards the SIS II National Systems (N.SIS 
II) can work in accordance with the technical and functional requirements set out in the SIS II 
legal instruments. 

The  SIS  II  tests  shall  also  demonstrate  that  SIS  II  can  work  in  accordance  with  the  non-
functional requirements such as robustness, availability and performance. 

2. 

PROCESS, SCOPE AND ORGANISATION OF SIS II TESTS  

The sequence of tests, their objective, scope and organisation shall be articulated as follows.  

The  first  phase  of  tests shall  address  testing  of  the  connectivity  and  resilience  of  the  SIS  II 
Communication Infrastructure.  

The second phase of tests shall address testing of the Central SIS II without N.SIS II. 

The  third  phase  of  tests  shall  address  testing  of  the  Central  SIS  II  with  some  N.SIS  II  and 
testing  of  the  compliance  of  each  national  system  with  the  specifications  described  in  the 
reference version of the Interface Control Document (ICD).  
The Test Advisory Group18 established by the SIS II Committee is competent to report on the 
results  of  the  tests  to  the  SIS  II  Committee.  The  Test  Advisory  Group  shall  identify, 
categorise  and  describe  any  issue  it  detects  and  propose  options  for  solutions.  The 
Commission services and the Member States' experts shall provide all necessary information 
for the Test Advisory Group to perform its task. 

2.1. 

Test documentation 

The  Commission  shall  define  the  detailed  specifications  of  the  tests.  The  Commission  shall 
make available to the Member States involved the draft and finalised test specifications and 
the provisions for the management and coordination of the tests within a schedule agreed with 
the Member States' experts.  

2.2. 

Coordination of the tests 

All tests set out in the test documentation shall be coordinated by the Commission. For doing 
so the Commission shall work in close cooperation with the Test Advisory Group composed 
of  representatives  of  the  Commission  and  Member  States'  experts.  Ad-hoc  experts  may  be 
consulted by the Test Advisory Group.  

The Test Advisory Group shall meet regularly and shall, in particular address issues relating 
to the schedule and the timing of the tests, and shall propose solutions to any difficulties that 
emerge during the running of the tests. 

2.3. 

Running the tests 

The  Commission  shall  execute  the  tests,  together  with  the  Member  States  involved  on  the 
basis of the test specifications and in accordance with the schedule agreed by the Commission 

18 

The Test Advisory Group created on 27 April 2007 according to Article 7 of the rules of procedure of 
the SIS II Committee, reports to the SIS II Committee after the completion of each test exercise to help 
preparing a decision related to the successful completion of SIS II tests. 

EN 

9 

   EN 

 
                                                 
together with Member States' experts, and demonstrate that the test results are as foreseen in 
the test specifications.  

For the N.SIS II compliance tests, each Member State, with the support of the Commission, 
shall be responsible for running and ensuring the smooth performance of the tests within the 
agreed schedule. 

2.4. 

Validation of the tests 

The Test Advisory Group shall report on the results of the tests to the SIS II Committee. The 
Test Advisory Group shall identify, categorise and describe any issue it detects and propose 
options for solutions. The Commission services and the Member States experts shall provide 
all necessary information for the Test Advisory Group to perform its task. 

The  results  of  the  SIS  II  tests  shall  be  validated  by  the  Commission.  Where  the  test 
documentation  divides  the  tests  into  separate  phases  the  Commission  shall  inform  the 
Member States of the results of each phase before the start of the following phase. 

The validation of the N.SIS II compliance tests shall take into account a report, prepared by 
an  expert  appointed  by  the  Member  States,  containing  a  detailed  analysis  of  the  test  results 
and conclusions as to the validation of the Member States' national systems. 

2.5. 

Tests of the communication infrastructure  

The  objective  of  this  test  exercise  shall  be  to  demonstrate  that  the  communication 
infrastructure of SIS II up to the uniform national interface (NI-SIS) can work in accordance 
with the requirements laid down in the Commission Decision 2007/170/EC and Commission 
Decision  2007/171/EC.  The  scope  of  this  test  includes  testing  the  connectivity  and  the 
resilience  of  the  SIS  II  communication  infrastructure  between  CS-SIS  and  each  NI-SIS, 
between the Central Unit and the back-up Central Unit, as well as the resilience of the Local 
National  Interfaces  (LNI)  and,  where  applicable,  the  Back-up  Local  National  Interfaces 
(BLNI). 

2.6. 

Central SIS II and national compliance tests  

The objective of the whole set of Central SIS II tests shall be to test that the Central SIS II 
meets the functional and non-functional specifications defined in the reference version of the 
ICD (Interface Control Document) and the DTS (Detailed Technical Specifications).  

The  objective  of  the  N.SIS  II  Compliance  test  shall  be  to  ensure  the  compatibility  of  each 
N.SIS  II  with  the  CS-SIS  and  to  verify  the  compliance  of  the  National  Systems  with  the 
reference version of the Interface Control Document and the Detailed Technical Specification. 
The compliance tests for the N.SIS II may run in parallel with the tests of the Central SIS II.  

After  the  successful  completion  of  the  SIS  II  tests,  the  Commission  shall  inform  Member 
States'  experts  within  the  framework  of  the  SIS  II  Committee  that  the  test  results  of  the 
communication  infrastructure  and  of  the  Central  SIS  II  tests  are  as  foreseen  in  the  test 
specifications.  

After the successful completion of the SIS II tests, the Commission shall set up a migration 
environment for the Central SIS II. This environment shall be stable and suitable to be used 
for migration. 

EN 

10 

   EN 

 
3. 

REFERENCE  VERSION  OF  THE  INTERFACE  CONTROL  DOCUMENT  (ICD)  AND 
DETAILED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION (DTS) VERSIONS FOR TESTING 

The Central SIS II and the national systems (N.SIS II) in each of the Member States shall be 
tested against the same specifications.  

The  DTS  prepared  by  the  Commission  shall  define  the  functional  and  non-functional 
specifications of the Central SIS II. 

The  ICD  prepared  by  the  Commission  shall  define  the  interface  between  the  Central  SIS  II 
and the national systems. It shall contain the technical specifications of the system-to-system 
interactions in terms of data items and messages passed, protocols used as well as timing and 
sequencing of events. 

Specifications,  as  provided  in  the  ICD  and  DTS,  shall  be  stable  for  a  given  period  and  the 
timing  of  update  of  both  systems  shall  be  laid  down  in  a  release  plan  that  shall  define  the 
reference version for a given test phase.  

Issues found during the test campaigns shall be reported, analysed and solved in accordance 
with  a  release  management  and  associated  change  management  plan.  The  release  plan  and 
associated change management plan shall be made available by the Commission, taking into 
account the opinion of Member States' experts.  

4. 

DECLARATION OF SUCCESS OF SIS II TESTS RESULTS  

The successful completion of all test phases described above shall qualify SIS II in respect of 
technical and functional requirements that are based on the SIS II legal instruments. The set of 
test use cases and test scenarios defined for all the tests shall ensure a sufficient coverage of 
scenarios. 

The  SIS  II  tests  shall  ensure  that  the  Commission  has  made  the  necessary  technical 
arrangements for allowing Central SIS II to be connected to the N.SIS II of the Member States 
concerned. 
At the end of the whole series of tests, in accordance with the mandate conferred upon it19, the 
Commission shall declare the successful completion of SIS II tests.  

The declaration of success of SIS II test results by the Commission referred to above shall be 
without prejudice to the subsequent validation of the proposed test result of a comprehensive 
test of SIS II by the preparatory bodies of the Council20.  

In order to facilitate this process, the Commission shall provide regular updates on the status 
of the project to the preparatory bodies of the Council, and shall provide specific information 
on  the  results  of  the  tests  including  the  related  discussions  with  the  Member  States'  experts 
taking place within the framework of the SIS II Committee.  

The  Commission  and  the  Member  States  shall,  within  the  framework  of  their  respective 
competences, and in particular the  mandate conferred upon the Commission21,  organise  any 

19 

20 

21 

Council Regulation (EC) No 2424/2001 and Council Decision 2001/886/JHA of 6 December 2001 on 
the development of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II), as amended. 
As described in Article 55(3) c) of Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 of the European Parliament and of 
the  Council  of  20 December 2006  on  the  establishment,  operation  and  use  of  the  second  generation 
Schengen Information System (SIS II), and Article 71 (3) c) of Decision 2007/533/JHA of 12 June 2007 
on the establishment, operation and use of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II). 
Council Regulation (EC) No 2424/2001 and Council Decision 2001/886/JHA of 6 December 2001 on 
the development of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II), as amended. 

EN 

11 

   EN 

 
                                                 
additional tests or actions necessary to ensure that the validation process to be performed by 
the preparatory bodies of the Council can be complete.  

EN 

12 

   EN