Case T-414/07: Action brought on 19 November 2007 — Euro-Information v OHIM (Representation of a hand holding a card plus three triangles)
Date: 2007-11-19
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), audiovisual equipment, consultancy, service, telecommunications, trade-mark law

26.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/45

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 13 December
2007 — Cabrera Sánchez v OHIM — Industrias Cárnicas
Valle (el charcutero artesano)

Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of
4 December 2007 — Cheminova and Others v Commission

(Case T-242/06) (1)

(Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Appli-
cation for the Community figurative mark el charcutero arte-
sano — Earlier national figurative mark El Charcutero —
Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion —
Absence of similarity between the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of
Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2008/C 22/83)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

(Case T-326/07 R)

(Application for interim relief — Directive 91/414/EEC —
Application for suspension of operation of a measure —
Admissibility — No urgency)

(2008/C 22/84)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Cheminova A/S (Harboøre, Denmark), Cheminova
Agro Italia Srl (Rome, Italy), Cheminova Bulgaria EOOD (Sofia,
Bulgaria), Agrodan, SA (Madrid, Spain) and Lodi SAS (Grand
Fougeray, France)
(represented by: C. Mereu and K. Van
Maldegem, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: B. Doherty and L. Parpala, Agents)

Applicant: Miguel Cabrera Sánchez (Móstoles, Spain) (represented
by: J. Calderón Chavero and T. Villate Consonni, lawyers)

Re:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market
(Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. García Murillo,
Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:
Industrias Cárnicas Valle, SA (Madrid, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal
of OHIM of 15 June 2006 (Case R 790/2005-1) relating to
opposition proceedings between Miguel Cabrera Sánchez and
Industrias Cárnicas Valle, SA.

Application for suspension of
the operation of Commission
Decision 2007/389/EC of 6 June 2007 concerning the non-
inclusion of malathion in Annex I
to Council Directive
91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant
protection products containing that substance (OJ 2007 L 146,
p. 19) pending the full resolution of the dispute in the main
proceedings

Operative part of the order

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.

2. Costs are reserved.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

Action brought on 19 November 2007 — Euro-Information
v OHIM (Representation of a hand holding a card plus
three triangles)

(Case T-414/07)

(2008/C 22/85)

Language of the case: French

2. Orders Miguel Cabrera Sánchez to bear his own costs and to pay
those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal
Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

Parties

(1) OJ C 261, 28.10.2006.

Applicant: Européene de traitement de l'Information (Euro-Infor-
mation)
(represented by P. Greffe and
M. Chaminade, lawyers)

(Strasbourg, France)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market
(Trade Marks and Designs)

C 22/46

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

26.1.2008

Form of order sought

— annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of
OHIM of 6 September 2007 in Case R 290/2007-1, in so
far as it refused the registration of the Community trade
mark No 5 225 776 in respect of goods and services
claimed in Classes 9, 35, 36, 38 and 42;

— registration of the Community trade mark No 5 225 776 in

respect of all the goods and services claimed.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark comprising a
representation of a hand holding a card followed by three black
triangles for goods and services in Classes 9, 35, 36, 38 and 42
(Application No 5 225 776)

Decision of the Examiner: Partial refusal to register

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Pleas in law: The applicant states that, contrary to the finding of
the Board of Appeal of OHIM in the contested decision, the
elements comprising the trade mark, the registration of which
was partially refused, are distinctive and arbitrary in respect of
the goods and services claimed and, consequently, their combi-
nation must be also considered to be distinctive and arbitrary.

Action brought on 22 November 2007 — Deutsche Post v
Commission

(Case T-421/07)

(2008/C 22/86)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Deutsche Post AG (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: J.
Sedemund and T. Lübbig, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Form of order sought

— Annul the decision of the Commission of the European
Communities of 12 September 2007 ‘State aid C 36/07 (ex
NN 25/07) — State aid to Deutsche Post AG, invitation to
submit comments pursuant
the EC
Treaty’;

to Article 88(2) of

— Order the defendant to pay the costs.

(OJ 2007 C 245, p. 21). The proceedings begun by that decision
are intended as a supplementary investigation into the proceed-
ings which were instituted on 23 October 1999 by the
Commission and in which the Commission issued a negative
decision on 19 June 2002 (OJ 2002 L 247, p 27). In that nega-
tive decision, the Commission found that Deutsche Post's prices
for its Haus-zu-Haus-Paketdienst (house to house parcel service)
were below the service-specific supplementary costs and that
that aggressive discount policy was not part of its public supply
obligations.

In support of its claim, the applicant submits that the contested
decision infringes basic procedural principles. In particular, there
is an infringement of the principle of the protection of legiti-
mate expectations, since the Commission had for years been
aware of the predominant facts of the case and on 19 June
2002 issued a final decision relating thereto. In addition, the
right of the Federal Republic of Germany and the applicant to
participate has been infringed in that they were not given the
opportunity to take a position on the contested decision before
it was issued. Finally, it is submitted in that regard that there is a
breach of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 (1), since it follows
from the scheme of that provision that a negative decision, such
as that of 19 June 2002, is final and that the defendant cannot
make facts which are subject to a final ruling the subject-matter
of a renewed aid verification procedure.

Further, the applicant submits that the defendant has infringed
the duty to state reasons under Article 253 EC and Article 6(1)
of Regulation No 659/1999, since the contested decision does
not make it clear which measures the Commission seeks to clas-
sify as State aid and, moreover, the decision contains no legal
description.

Finally, it is alleged that there is an infringement of Article 87(1)
EC and Article 88 EC, since the measures referred to in the
contested decision ought not to be classified as State aid.

(1) Council Decision (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down
detailed rules for the application of Article [88 EC] (OJ 1999 L 83,
p. 1).

Action brought on 16 November 2007 — Agencja
Wydawnicza Technopol v OHIM (100)

(Case T-425/07)

(2008/C 22/87)

Language of the case: Polish

Pleas in law and main arguments

Parties

the
The applicant seeks the annulment of
Commission to institute the proceedings under Article 88(2) EC
with regard to State aid C 26/07 (ex NN 25/07). That decision
was notified to Germany by letter of 12 September 2007

the decision of

Applicant: Agencja Wydawnicza
(Częstochowa, Poland)
adviser)

z
(represented by D. Rzążewska,

Technopol

sp.

o.o.
legal