Proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1487/2005 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain finished polyester filament fabrics originating in the People’s Republic of China
Date: 2007-08-24
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: China, anti-dumping duty, anti-dumping legislation, import, man-made fibre, originating product, textile industry

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES 

Brussels, 24.8.2007 
COM(2007) 481 final 

Proposal for a 

COUNCIL REGULATION  

amending Regulation (EC) No 1487/2005 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and 
collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain finished 
polyester filament fabrics originating in the People’s Republic of China 

(presented by the Commission) 

EN 

   EN 

 
 
 
  
EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM 

Context of the proposal 

Grounds for and objectives of the proposal 

This  proposal  concerns  the  application  of  Council  Regulation  (EC)  No  384/96  of 
22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members 
of  the  European  Community,  as  last  amended  by  Council  Regulation  (EC) 
No 2117/2005  of  21  December  2005  (‘the  basic  Regulation’)  to  imports  of  certain 
finished polyester filament fabrics originating in the People’s Republic of China. 

General context 

This proposal is made in the context of the implementation of the basic Regulation and 
is the result of an investigation which was carried out in line with the substantive and 
procedural requirements laid out in the basic Regulation. 

Existing provisions in the area of the proposal 

Not applicable. 

Consistency with other policies and objectives of the Union 

Not applicable. 

Consultation of interested parties and impact assessment 

Consultation of interested parties 

Interested  parties  concerned  by  the  proceeding  have  already  had  the  possibility  to 
defend their interests during the investigation, in line with the provisions of the basic 
Regulation. 

Collection and use of expertise 

There was no need for external expertise. 

Impact assessment 

This proposal is the result of the implementation of the basic Regulation. 

The  basic  Regulation  does  not  foresee  a  general  impact  assessment  but  contains  an 
exhaustive list of conditions that have to be assessed. 

Legal elements of the proposal 

Summary of the proposed action 

On  28.12.2006  a  reinvestigation  pursuant  to  Article  12  of  the  basic  Regulation  was 
initiated  with  regard  to  anti-dumping  measures  imposed  by  Council  Regulation  (EC)  No 
1487/2005  on  imports  of  certain  finished  polyester  filament  fabrics  originating  in  the 
People’s Republic of China. 

EN 

2 

   EN 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The attached proposal for a Council Regulation amending the above Council Regulation is 
based on the findings of the reinvestigation whether absorption of the above anti-dumping 
measures took place. As a result of this a new dumping margin and a new duty have been 
calculated. 

It  is  therefore  proposed  that  the  Council  adopt  the  attached  proposal  for  a  Council 
Regulation, which should be published at the latest on 27 September 2007 in the Official 
Journal of the European Union. 

Legal basis 

Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped 
imports  from  countries  not  members  of  the  European  Community,  as  last  amended  by 
Council Regulation (EC) No 2117/2005 of 21 December 2005.  

Subsidiarity principle 

The  proposal  falls  under  the  exclusive  competence  of  the  Community.  The  subsidiarity 
principle therefore does not apply. 

Proportionality principle 

The proposal complies with the proportionality principle for the following reasons. 

The  form  of  action  is  described  in  the  above-mentioned  basic  Regulation  and  leaves  no 
scope for national decision. 

Indication  of  how  financial  and  administrative  burden  falling  upon  the  Community, 
national  governments,  regional  and  local  authorities,  economic  operators  and  citizens  is 
minimized and proportionate to the objective of the proposal is not applicable. 

Choice of instruments 

Proposed instruments: Regulation. 

Other  means  would  not  be  adequate  because  the  basic  Regulation  does  not  foresee 
alternative options. 

Budgetary implication 

The proposal has no implication for the Community budget 

EN 

3 

   EN 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Proposal for a 

COUNCIL REGULATION  

amending Regulation (EC) No 1487/2005 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and 
collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain finished 
polyester filament fabrics originating in the People’s Republic of China 

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, 

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, 

Having  regard  to  Council  Regulation  (EC)  No  384/96  of  22  December  1995  on  protection 
against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community1 (the basic 
Regulation), and in particular Articles 9 and 12 thereof, 

Having  regard  to  the  proposal  submitted  by  the  Commission  after  consulting  the  Advisory 
Committee, 

Whereas: 

A. 

PROCEDURE 

1. 

Original measures 

(1) 

(2) 

(3) 

investigation  ('the  original 
In  September  2005,  following  an  anti-dumping 
investigation')  the  Council,  by  Regulation  (EC)  No  1487/20052,  imposed  definitive 
anti-dumping duties ('the original measures')  on  imports  of  certain  finished  polyester 
filament fabrics (FPFAF) originating, in the People’s Republic of China ('China'). The 
duty rates applicable to Chinese FPFAF varied from 14.1% to 56.2%.  

2. 

Request for an anti-absorption reinvestigation 

On  13  November  2006,  a  request  for  a  reinvestigation  of  the  original  measures  was 
lodged pursuant to Article 12 of the basic Regulation. The request was submitted by 
AIUFFASS (the applicant), on behalf of producers representing a major proportion, in 
this case more than 30% of the total Community production of FPFAF.  

The applicant submitted sufficient information showing that following the imposition 
of the original anti-dumping duties on FPFAF originating in China export prices have 
decreased and that there has been insufficient movement in resale prices or subsequent 
selling  prices  in  the  Community.  This  allegedly  resulted  in  an  increase  of  dumping 
which  has  impeded  the  intended  remedial  effects  of  the  measures  in  force.  The 
applicant  also  provided  evidence  that  imports  of  the  product  concerned  from  China 
have continued to enter in significant quantities the Community market. 

1 

2 

OJ  L  56,  6.3.1996,  p.  1.  Regulation  as 
2117/2005…………………………. 
OJ L 240, 16.9.2005, p. 1. 

last  amended  by  Regulation 

(EC)  No 

EN 

4 

   EN 

 
 
 
                                                 
3. 

The anti-absorption reinvestigation 

(4) 

(5) 

(6) 

(7) 

On  28  December  2006,  the  Commission  announced  by  a  notice  published  in  the 
Official  Journal  of  the  European  Union  ('NOI')3  the  initiation  of  a  reinvestigation, 
pursuant  to  Article 12  of  the  basic  Regulation,  of  the  anti-dumping  measures 
applicable to imports of FPFAF originating in China.  

The  Commission  officially  advised  the  producers/exporters  known  to  be  concerned, 
the representatives of the exporting country, importers and users of the initiation of the 
reinvestigation.  Interested  parties  were  given  the  opportunity  to  make  their  views 
known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set out in the notice of 
initiation. The Commission sent questionnaires to all parties known to be concerned. 

In view of the high number of exporting producers and importers concerned during the 
original investigation, sampling was envisaged in the NOI in accordance with Article 
17  of  the  basic  Regulation.  In  order  to  enable  the  Commission  to  decide  whether 
sampling would be necessary and, if so, to select a sample, all exporting producers and 
importers  were  asked  to  make  themselves  known  to  the  Commission  and  to  provide 
basic information.  

The  Commission  sought  and  verified  all  the  information  deemed  necessary  to 
determine  whether  export  prices  have  decreased  and  if  there  has  been  insufficient 
movement in resale prices or subsequent selling prices in the Community. Verification 
visits were carried out at the premises of the cooperating exporters/producers in China 
and their related companies where necessary: 

–  Nantong Teijin Co. Ltd and its related importer NI-Teijin Shoji Europe GmbH 

–  Fuzhou Fuhua Textile & Printing Dyeing Co. Ltd 

–  Fuzhou Ta-Tung Textile Works Co. Ltd 

–  Hangzhou Delicacy Textile Co. Ltd 

–  Shaoxing County Jiade Weaving and Dyeing Co. Ltd 

–  Wujiang Xiangsheng Textile dyeing & Finishing Co. Ltd and its related company 

–  Wujiang Longsheng Textile Co. Ltd 

(8) 

The investigation period of this reinvestigation ('new IP') ran from 1st October 2005 to 
30  September  2006.  The  new  IP  was  used  to  determine  the  current  level  of  export 
prices  and  the  level  of  the  prices  delivered  to  the  first  independent  customer  in  the 
Community.  In  establishing  whether  the  prices  in  the  Community  had  moved 
sufficiently,  the  price  levels  charged  during  the  new  IP  were  compared  to  those 
charged  during  the  original  investigation  period  (original  IP)  which  had  covered  the 
period from 1st April 2003 to 30th March 2004. 

3 

OJ C 320, 28.12.2006, p. 8. 

EN 

5 

   EN 

 
 
                                                 
(9) 

It should be noted that the Commission had to allow sufficient time to the parties to 
make  themselves  known  and  to  select  a  sample  of  exporting  producers  in  China  in 
accordance  with  Article 17  of  the  basic  Regulation.  In  view  of  various  exceptional 
circumstances  the  co-operating  parties  also  requested  extensions  to  submit  their 
replies.  These  extensions  were  granted  when  duly  justified.  For  these  reasons,  the 
reinvestigation  slightly  exceeded  the  normal  period  of  six  months  provided  for  in 
Article 12(4) of the basic Regulation. 

B. 

PRODUCT UNDER CONSIDERATION 

(10)  The product for which the reinvestigation was initiated is the same as in the original 
investigation, namely finished polyester filament apparel fabrics ('FPFAF'), normally 
classified within CN codes  ex  5407 51 00, 5407 52 00, 5407 54 00, ex 5407 61  10, 
5407 61 30, 5407 61 90 and ex 5407 69 10 and ex 5407 69 90. The product concerned 
is  woven  fabrics  of  synthetic  filament  yarn  containing  85%  or  more  by  weight  of 
textured  and/or  non-textured  polyester  filament,  dyed  (including  dyed  white)  or 
printed originating in the People's Republic of China. The product concerned is used 
mainly in the textile industry.  

C. 

THE REINVESTIGATION 

(11) 

In  general,  a  reinvestigation  pursuant  to  Article  12  of  the  basic  Regulation  aims  at 
establishing  whether  or  not  there  was  a  sufficient  movement  in  prices  in  the 
Community of FPFAF originating in China further to the imposition of original anti-
dumping measures. As a second step, where it is concluded that absorption took place, 
a  new  dumping  margin  should  be  calculated.  Article  12  of  the  basic  Regulation 
provides  for  an  opportunity  to  importers/users  and  exporters  to  submit  evidence  that 
could justify a lack of movement in prices in the Community following the imposition 
of measures for reasons other than absorption of the anti-dumping duty.  

1. 

Sampling 

(12)  As mentioned in recital (6) above the Commission requested all exporting producers 
and  importers  to  make  themselves  known  and  to  provide  basic  information  on  their 
activities  during  the  new  IP.These  parties  were  also  requested  to  indicate  their 
willingness to be included in a sample. 

(a) 

Exporters / producers 

(13) 

26  exporters  /  producers  agreed  to  provide  the  requested  information  and  to  be 
included in a sample. Given the large number of exporters / producers, it was decided 
that  sampling  was  necessary  with  regards  to  establishing  possible  absorption  by 
exporters/producers  in  China.  While  preference  was  given  to  companies  which  were 
included in the sample of the original investigation, a selection which allowed to cover 
the  largest  representative  volume  of  exports  which  can  be  reasonably  investigated 
within  the  time  available  was  made.  In  accordance  with  Article  17(2)  of  the  basic 
Regulation,  the  Chinese  authorities  were  consulted  on  the  sample  and  raised  no 
objections.  

EN 

6 

   EN 

 
 
 
 
 
(14)  Nine  companies  were  initially  selected  to  be  included  in  the  sample.  One  company 
which  was  granted  individual  treatment  (IT)  and  eight  others  which  were  granted 
market  economy  status  (MES)  during  the  original  investigation.  Just  before  the 
verification visits took place in China, two companies (the one with IT and one with 
MES)  decided  to  withdraw  from  the  sample.  These  2  companies  were  considered  as 
non-cooperating in the current reinvestigation. As a result, it remained 24 cooperating 
companies and a sample constituted of 7 exporters /producers with MES. At that stage 
the  Commission  observed  that  no  exporters  /  producers  with  IT  cooperated  in  the 
investigation.  

(15)  The  remaining  seven  companies  included  in  the  sample  had  all  MES  and  represent 
around  78%  of  the  exports  to  the  EU  made  by  all  the  cooperating  companies  and 
23.9% of the total Chinese exports of FPFAF to the Community market. At that stage 
of  the  reinvestigation,  it  was  concluded  that  these  companies  constituted  the  largest 
volume  which  could  reasonably  be  investigated  within  the  time  available.  These  7 
companies were therefore deemed to be representative for the purpose of sampling in 
the reinvestigation.  

(b) 

Importers 

(16)  No  unrelated  importers  submitted  the  requested  information  within  the  time  limit 

defined in the NOI.  

2. 

Non-cooperation 

(17)  The  24  cooperating  exporters /  producers  which agreed to be included in the sample 
represented around 30 % of the total export of Chinese FPFAF to the Community. As 
mentioned  in  recital  (14)  above,  2  additional  producers  withdrew  cooperation.  As  a 
result, non-cooperation finally amounted to around 70 % of total export of FPFAF to 
the Community market.  

(18)  On that basis, it was considered than non-cooperation in this case was high.  

3. 

Movement of prices in the Community 

3.1.  General 

(19) 

It  is  recalled  that  no  unrelated  importers  /  users  of  the  product  concerned  offered 
cooperation  for  the  reinvestigation.  As  mentioned  in  recital  (18)  above,  non-
cooperation from exporters / producers in China is high.  

(20)  Except  for  one  exporter  /  producer  included  in  the  sample  the  pattern  of  trade  for 
FPFAF originating in China is characterised by the absence of related intermediaries 
importing  the  product  concerned  into  the  Community  for  resale.  The  independent 
buyers  of  FPFAF  are  generally  user  companies  which  are  directly  importing  the 
product concerned for their own internal consumption. 

(21) 

It  was  found  that  the  sales  conditions  for  the  export  sales  made  by  the  exporters  / 
producers  in  the  sample  during  the  new  IP  were  generally  made  on  a  CIF  (cost, 
insurance  and  freight)  basis.  Therefore,  for  the  purpose  of  assessing  any  price 
movement the price level for the product concerned was first determined at CIF level. 
For the new IP, the CIF price at the Community border was established on the basis of 

EN 

7 

   EN 

 
 
 
 
information  submitted  by  the  co-operating  Chinese  exporters  /  producers  included  in 
the sample.  

3.2.  Movement in resale price in the Community for the sample companies 

(22) 

In  order  to  assess  any  movement  of  prices  at  exporter  /  producer  level  in  the 
Community the average price of FPFAF, on a type by type basis, established for the 
new IP was compared with the average price of FPFAF established during the original 
IP at the same level of trade and for the same delivery conditions.  

(23)  On  that  basis,  the  comparison  showed  that  the  average  price  in  the  Community  of 
FPFAF  originating  in  China  for  all  the  companies  included  in  the  sample  did  not 
decrease during the new IP. 

(24)  The movement of resale price for one related importer established in the Community 
was  assessed  on  a  type  by  type  basis.  Resale  prices  to  unrelated  customers  in  the 
Community  were  compared  for  the  same  delivery  conditions  between  both 
investigation  periods.  Based  on  the  information  gathered,  it  was  demonstrated  that 
prices had increased by amounts exceeding the anti-dumping duty.  

3.3.  Claims made by interested parties  

(25)  Several  interested  parties  claimed  that  an  adjustment  should  be  made  to  their  export 
price. They invoked that the variation in USD/EUR exchange rate led to an artificial 
decrease  of  their  export  price  during  the  new  IP.  However,  given  that  no  price 
decrease  was  found  during  the  new  IP  even  before  the  application  of  this  claimed 
adjustment which would lead to decreasing prices in the old IP, it was not considered 
necessary to examine the claim.  

3.4.  Movement in resale price in the Community for the non-co-operators 

(26)  Given the high level on non-cooperation, around 70 % in this case, an absorption duty 
should  be  imposed  on  all  non-cooperating  exporters/producers  in  the  PRC.  The 
absorption  duty  should  be  established  on  the  basis  of  Article  18  of  the  basic 
Regulation (BR), namely on the basis of the best information available.  

(27) 

In  the  present  case  it  is  considered  that  the  data  available  under  the  Eurostat  import 
statistic constitutes the most direct and the most reliable that can be used to establish 
the level at which non-cooperating Chinese exporters were exporting their FPFAF in 
the Community market. If we exclude from Eurostat the data verified at the level co-
operating  companies  for  which  no  absorption  was  found  to  exist,  the  absorption 
margin for non-co-operating companies, based on Eurostat is established at 18.6 %.  

3.5.  Conclusion on the movement of sales price in the Community 

(28)  Based  on  the  above  facts  and  considerations,  it  was  concluded  that  none  of  the 
exporters / producers included in the sample absorbed the anti-dumping duty in force. 
No  absorption  duty  should  therefore  be  established  for  all  exporters  /  producers  in 
China which agreed to cooperate and to be included in the sample.  

(29)  An  absorption  duty  set  at  18,6 %  should  however  be  applied  on  all  non-cooperating 

exporters / producers in China. 

EN 

8 

   EN 

 
4. 

New level of the measure  

(a)  For the companies included in the sample 

(30)  Given that the companies included in the sample could demonstrate that there was no 
decrease in their export price of the product concerned to the Community market, the 
level of the measures remains unchanged : 

Company 

Fuzhou Fuhua Textile & Printing Dyeing Co., Ltd 

Fuzhou Ta-Tung Textile Works Co., Ltd 

Hangzhou De Licacy Textile Co., Ltd 

Nantong Teijin Co. Ltd  

Definitive 
duty 

14,1% 

14,1% 

14,1% 

14,1% 

Shaoxing County Jiade Weaving and Dyeing Co., Ltd 

14,1% 

Wujiang Longsheng Textile Co., Ltd 

14,1% 

Wujiang Xiangsheng Textile Dyeing & Finishing Co., Ltd 

14,1% 

(b)  For the cooperating exporting producers not included in the sample, 

(31)  The same conclusion should apply to the 17 companies which offered cooperation and 

agreed to be included in the sample : 

Company 

Shaoxing Zhengda Group Co., Ltd 

Far Eastern Industries (Shanghai) Ltd 

Zhejiang Yonglong Enterprises Co., Ltd 

Definitive 
AD duty rate 

14,1% 

14,1% 

14,1% 

Zhuji Bolan Textile Industrial Development Co., Ltd 

14,1% 

Zhejiang  Shaoxing  Tianyuan  Textile  Printing  and  Dyeing 
Co., Ltd 

14,1% 

Zhejiang XiangSheng Group Co., Ltd 

Hangzhou ZhenYa Textile Co., Ltd 

Huzhou Styly Jingcheng Textile Co., Ltd 

Hangzhou Yongsheng Textile Co., Ltd 

14,1% 

14,1% 

14,1% 

14,1% 

EN 

9 

   EN 

 
 
Zhejiang Shaoxing Yongli Printing and Dyeing Co., Ltd 

14,1% 

Hangzhou Hongfeng Textile Co., Ltd 

Shaoxing Yinuo Printing & Dyeing Co., Ltd 

Shaoxing Ancheng Cloth industrial Co., Ltd 

Hangzhou Jieenda Textile Co., Ltd 

Hangzhou Mingyuan Textile Co., Ltd 

Hangzhou Yililong Textile Co., Ltd 

Zheijiang Singmetat Print and Dyeing Co. Ltd 

(c)  For all other exporting producers, 

14,1% 

14,1% 

14,1% 

14,1% 

14,1% 

14,1% 

56.2% 

(32)  For the non cooperating parties, as mentioned above in recital (26) it was considered 
appropriate  to  amend  the  level  of  the  anti-dumping  duty  in  accordance  with  the  last 
sentence of the Article 12(3) of the basic Regulation. The revised rate of anti-dumping 
duty  applicable,  before  duty,  to  the  net  free-at-Community-frontier  price  will  be  as 
follow :  

Company 

Hangzhou CaiHong Textile Co., Ltd 

Hangzhou Fuen Textile Co., Ltd 

Hangzhou Jinsheng Textile Co., Ltd 

Hangzhou Shenda Textile Co., Ltd 

Hangzhou Xiaoshan Phoenix Industry Co., Ltd 

Hangzhou Zhengda Textile Co., Ltd 

Definitive 
duty 

55,7% 

55,7% 

55,7% 

28,2% 

55,7% 

55,7% 

Shaoxing  China  Light  &  Textile  Industrial  City  Somet 
Textile Co., Ltd 

55,7% 

Shaoxing County Fengyi Textile Printing & Dyeing Co., Ltd 

55,7% 

Shaoxing County Huaxiang Textile Co., Ltd 

Shaoxing County Pengyue Textile Co., Ltd 

Shaoxing County Qing Fang Cheng Textiles Imp. & Exp. 
Co., Ltd 

45,3 % 

28,2% 

52,5% 

EN 

10 

   EN 

 
Shaoxing County Xingxin Textile Co., Ltd 

28,2% 

Shaoxing  Golden 
Sandwashing Co., Ltd 

tree 

silk  Printing  Dyeing  and 

55,7% 

Shaoxing Nanchi Textile Printing-Dyeing Co., Ltd 

Shaoxing Ronghao Textiles Co., Ltd 

Shaoxing Tianlong Import and Export Co., Ltd 

Shaoxing Xinghui Textile Co., Ltd 

Shaoxing Yongda Textiles Co., Ltd 

Wujiang Canhua Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd 

55,7% 

52,5% 

65% 

55,7% 

55,7% 

74,8% 

Zhejiang  Golden  Time  Printing  and  Dyeing  knitwear  Co., 
Ltd 

55,7% 

Zhejiang Huagang Dyeing and Weaving Co., Ltd 

Zhejiang Shaoxiao Printing and Dyeing Co., Ltd 

All other companies 

55,7% 

55,7% 

74,8% 

EN 

11 

   EN 

 
5. 

Special provision for exporters in China that may not absorb 

(33) 

In view of the findings of the investigation, the low cooperation in China which may 
be  linked  to  the  fact  that  exporting  producers  of  FPFAF  are  Small  and  Medium 
Enterprises, the Community may re-examine the situation of exporters that could not 
cooperate in this reinvestigation in case they come forward with evidence showing that 
they  were  not  absorbing  the  anti-dumping  measures  in  force  during  the  current 
investigation period. This possibility is open to all producers / exporters of the product 
under consideration in China. 

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: 

Article 1 

Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1487/2005 shall be replaced by the following: 

‘2. 
The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty applicable to the net free-at Community-
frontier price, before duty, of the products described in paragraph 1 and manufactured by the 
companies below shall be as follows: 

Company 

Definitive 
anti- 
dumping duty 

TARIC 
Additional 
code 

Fuzhou Fuhua Textile & Printing Dyeing Co., Ltd 

Fuzhou Ta-Tung Textile Works Co., Ltd 

Hangzhou De Licacy Textile Co., Ltd 

Nantong Teijin Co. Ltd  

Shaoxing County Jiade Weaving and Dyeing Co., Ltd 

Wujiang Longsheng Textile Co., Ltd 

14,1% 

14,1% 

14,1% 

14,1% 

14,1% 

14,1% 

Wujiang Xiangsheng Textile Dyeing & Finishing Co., Ltd 

14,1% 

Shaoxing Zhengda Group Co., Ltd 

Far Eastern Industries (Shanghai) Ltd 

Zhejiang Yonglong Enterprises Co., Ltd 

Zhuji Bolan Textile Industrial Development Co., Ltd 

14,1% 

14,1% 

14,1% 

14,1% 

A617 

A617 

A617 

A617 

A617 

A617 

A617 

A617 

A617 

A617 

A617 

Zhejiang  Shaoxing  Tianyuan  Textile  Printing  and  Dyeing  Co., 
Ltd 

14,1% 

A617 

Zhejiang XiangSheng Group Co., Ltd 

Hangzhou ZhenYa Textile Co., Ltd 

14,1% 

14,1% 

A617 

A617 

EN 

12 

   EN 

 
Huzhou Styly Jingcheng Textile Co., Ltd 

Hangzhou Yongsheng Textile Co., Ltd 

Zhejiang Shaoxing Yongli Printing and Dyeing Co., Ltd 

Hangzhou Hongfeng Textile Co., Ltd 

Shaoxing Yinuo Printing & Dyeing Co., Ltd 

Shaoxing Ancheng Cloth industrial Co., Ltd 

Hangzhou Jieenda Textile Co., Ltd 

Hangzhou Mingyuan Textile Co., Ltd 

Hangzhou Yililong Textile Co., Ltd 

Zheijiang Singmetat Print and Dyeing Co. Ltd 

Hangzhou CaiHong Textile Co., Ltd 

Hangzhou Fuen Textile Co., Ltd 

Hangzhou Jinsheng Textile Co., Ltd 

Hangzhou Shenda Textile Co., Ltd 

Hangzhou Xiaoshan Phoenix Industry Co., Ltd 

Hangzhou Zhengda Textile Co., Ltd 

14,1% 

14,1% 

14,1% 

14,1% 

14,1% 

14,1% 

14,1% 

14,1% 

14,1% 

56.2% 

55,7% 

55,7% 

55,7% 

28,2% 

55,7% 

55,7% 

Shaoxing  China  Light  &  Textile  Industrial  City  Somet  Textile 
Co., Ltd 

55,7% 

Shaoxing County Fengyi Textile Printing & Dyeing Co., Ltd 

55,7% 

Shaoxing County Huaxiang Textile Co., Ltd 

Shaoxing County Pengyue Textile Co., Ltd 

45,3 % 

28,2% 

A617 

A617 

A617 

A617 

A617 

A617 

A617 

A617 

A617 

A836 

A623 

A623 

A623 

A837 

A623 

A623 

A623 

A623 

A619 

A837 

Shaoxing  County  Qing  Fang  Cheng  Textiles  Imp.  &  Exp.  Co., 
Ltd 

52,5% 

A621 

Shaoxing County Xingxin Textile Co., Ltd 

28,2% 

Shaoxing  Golden  tree  silk  Printing  Dyeing  and  Sandwashing 
Co., Ltd 

55,7% 

Shaoxing Nanchi Textile Printing-Dyeing Co., Ltd 

Shaoxing Ronghao Textiles Co., Ltd 

Shaoxing Tianlong Import and Export Co., Ltd 

55,7% 

52,5% 

65% 

A837 

A623 

A623 

A620 

A622 

EN 

13 

   EN 

 
Shaoxing Xinghui Textile Co., Ltd 

Shaoxing Yongda Textiles Co., Ltd 

Wujiang Canhua Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd 

55,7% 

55,7% 

74,8% 

Zhejiang Golden Time Printing and Dyeing knitwear Co., Ltd 

55,7% 

Zhejiang Huagang Dyeing and Weaving Co., Ltd 

Zhejiang Shaoxiao Printing and Dyeing Co., Ltd 

All other companies 

55,7% 

55,7% 

74,8% 

A623 

A623 

A618 

A623 

A623 

A623 

A999 

This  Regulation  shall  enter  into  force  on  the  day  following  that  of  its  publication  in  the 
Official Journal of the European Union. 

Article 2 

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States. 

Done at Brussels,  

For the Council 
The President 

EN 

14 

   EN