Commission Regulation (EC) No 787/2007 of 4 July 2007 amending Commission Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 establishing the Community list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Community (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2007-07-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: air law, air safety, air transport, aircraft fleet, common transport policy, transport regulations

L 175/10

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

5.7.2007

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 787/2007

of 4 July 2007

amending Commission Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 establishing the Community list of air carriers
which are subject to an operating ban within the Community

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty
Community,

establishing the European

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005 of
the
European Parliament and the Council of 14 December 2005
on the establishment of a Community list of air carriers subject
to an operating ban within the Community and on informing
air transport passengers of the identity of the operating air
carrier, and repealing Article 9 of Directive 2004/36/EC (1),
and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Whereas:

(1)

(2)

(3)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 of 22 March
2006 established the Community list of air carriers
to an operating ban within the
which are subject
Community referred to in Chapter
II of Regulation
(EC) No 2111/2005 (2).

In accordance with Article 4(3) of Regulation (EC) No
2111/2005, some Member States communicated to the
Commission information that is relevant in the context
of updating the Community list. Relevant information
was also communicated by third countries. On this
basis, the Community list should be updated.

In accordance with Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No
2111/2005 and Article 2 of Commission Regulation
(EC) No 473/2006 of 22 March 2006 laying down
implementing rules
the Community list of air
carriers which are subject to an operating ban within
the Community referred to in Chapter II of Regulation
(EC) No 2111/2005 (3), a Member State requested to
update the Community list.

for

(4)

The Commission informed all air carriers concerned
either directly or, when this was not practicable,
through the authorities responsible for their regulatory

(1) OJ L 344, 27.12.2005, p. 15.
(2) OJ L 84, 23.3.2006, p. 14. Regulation as amended by Regulation

(EC) No 235/2007 (OJ L 66, 6.3.2007, p. 3).

(3) OJ L 84, 23.3.2005, p. 8.

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

oversight, indicating the essential facts and considerations
which would form the basis for a decision to impose on
them an operating ban within the Community or to
modify the conditions of an operating ban imposed on
an air carrier which is included in the Community list.

Opportunity was given by the Commission to the air
carriers concerned to consult the documents provided
by Member States, to submit written comments and to
make an oral presentation to the Commission within 10
working days and to the Air Safety Committee estab-
lished by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3922/91 of 16
technical
December 1991 on the harmonization of
requirements and administrative procedures in the field
of civil aviation (4).

authorities with

The
oversight over
consulted by the Commission as well as,
cases, by some Member States.

regulatory
the air carriers concerned have been
in specific

responsibility

for

Pakistan International Airlines

On 14 May 2007 Pakistan International Airlines
submitted a recovery action plan to the Commission,
followed by evidence confirming the implementation of
a number of corrective actions. The Commission takes
note that significant progress has been made by the
carrier following its inclusion in the Community list,
and that the carrier, supported by its oversight auth-
orities, confirmed that it has rectified safety deficiencies
on part of its fleet. The competent authorities of Pakistan
have endorsed these measures.

As a consequence, on the basis of the common criteria, it
is assessed that Pakistan International Airlines should be
allowed to operate to the Community also with the
following eleven aircraft: three Boeing 747-300s with
registration marks AP-BFU, AP-BGG and AP-BFX; two
Boeing 747-200s with registration marks AP-BAK and
AP-BAT; six Airbus A-310s with registration marks AP-
BEU, AP-BGP, AP-BGR, AP-BGN, AP-BEC and AP-BEG.
The mentioned aircraft should consequently be removed
from Annex B.

(4) OJ L 373, 31.12.1991, p. 4.

5.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 175/11

(9)

(10)

(11)

(12)

the Islamic Republic of
The competent authorities of
Pakistan have agreed that, before the resumption of
operations of each individual aircraft concerned,
they
shall provide the authorities of
the Member State of
the airport of destination, as well as the Commission,
the aircraft which
with a safety inspection report of
they have conducted before the aircraft
is due to
operate. On receipt of the report, the relevant Member
State may,
if necessary, ban the aircraft in accordance
with Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005. On
arrival, a complete SAFA ramp inspection of
the
aircraft should be carried out, and its report should be
submitted without delay to the Commission which will
forward it to the other Member States. Member States
effective
further
to ensure
intend
compliance with relevant
through
systematic ramp inspections on this carrier.

verification of
standards
safety

The remaining aircraft in this carrier's fleet still do not
meet
fully the relevant safety standards and should
therefore be retained in Annex B pending rectification
of outstanding deficiencies. An on-site follow-up visit
should be organised before further reviews of the oper-
ational restrictions imposed on the carrier,
in order to
verify the full implementation of the recovery action plan
and its progress. Both the carrier and its competent
authorities have confirmed acceptance of this visit.

TAAG — Angola Airlines

There is verified evidence of serious safety deficiencies on
the part of TAAG Angola Airlines certified in Angola.
These deficiencies have been identified by France during
ramp
SAFA
performed
programme. The repetition of these inspection findings
shows systemic safety deficiencies (1).

inspections

under

the

TAAG Angola Airlines demonstrated a lack of ability to
address safety deficiencies in response to requests by
France,
in spite of guarantees given by the carrier and
its competent authorities as demonstrated by persistent
safety deficiencies. Also, there is insufficient ability of the
competent authorities of Angola to enforce the relevant
safety standards, despite the guarantees given by these
authorities.

(14) Whilst acknowledging the effort made by the carrier
towards the identification of
the actions necessary to
redress its safety situation, as well as the disposition
towards cooperation shown by both the carrier and the
competent authorities of civil aviation of Angola, the
Commission considers that
the satisfactory implemen-
tation of an adequate corrective action plan by the
carrier is not completed.

(15)

Therefore, on the basis of the common criteria,
it is
assessed that TAAG Angola Airlines does not meet the
relevant safety standards. The air carrier should be subject
to a ban to all its operations and should be included in
Annex A.

(16)

(17)

(18)

(19)

Volare Aviation

to update the Community list

The Netherlands has submitted to the Commission a
in accordance
request
with Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2111/2005 in
view of imposing an operating ban on the whole fleet of
Volare Aviation.

There is verified evidence of serious safety deficiencies on
the part of Volare Aviation certified in Ukraine. These
deficiencies have been identified by the Netherlands
the SAFA
during ramp inspections performed under
programme,
inspections
performed in other Member States. The repetition of
these inspection findings
systemic safety de-
ficiencies (2).

confirmed

shows

ramp

and

by

Volare Aviation demonstrated a lack of ability to address
safety deficiencies at
in response to
requests by the Netherlands, as demonstrated by the
insufficient corrective action plan presented in response
to identified safety deficiencies.

systemic level

The competent authorities of Ukraine demonstrated a
lack of ability to implement and enforce the relevant
safety standards, when concerns about the safety of the
operation of Volare Aviation certified in that state were
raised.

(13)

The competent authorities of Angola demonstrated a lack
of ability to implement and enforce the relevant safety
standards, when concerns about
the
operation of TAAG certified in that State were raised.

the safety of

(1) DGAC/F-2003-419,

DGAC/F-2005-394,
DGAC/F-2003-1026,
DGAC/F-2005-1185,
DGAC/F-2006-566,
DGAC/F-2006-27,
DGAC/F-2006-1598, DGAC/F-2006-1966, DGAC/F-2006-2087,
DGAC/F-2006-2069,
DGAC/F-2007-838,
DGAC/F-2007-418,
DGAC/F-2007-841, DGAC/F-2007-1113, DGAC/F-2007-1141.

(2) BCAA-2004-58, CAA-N-2006-228, CAA-N-2007-56, CAA-N-
2007-73, CAA-NL-2005-37, CAA-NL-2006-243, CAA-NL-2007-1,
CAA-NL-2007-2, CAA-NL-2007-3, CAA-NL-2007-23, CAA-NL-
2007-24, CAA-NL-2007-44, CAA-NL-2007-45, CAA-NL-2007-46,
CAA-NL-2007-47, CAA-NL-2007-48, CAA-UK-2007-31, CAAFIN-
2004-14, CAAFIN-2004-27, DGAC-E-2006-1131, DGAC-E-2006-
1386, DGAC-E-2007-376, DGAC/F-2006-138, DGAC/F-2006-830,
DGAC/F-2006-1041, DGAC/F-2006-1928, DGAC/F-2007-446,
ENAC-IT-2004-477,
DGAC/F-2007-739,
DGAC/F-2007-738,
ENAC-IT-2005-118,
ENAC-IT-2006-445,
ENAC-IT-2006-299,
LBA/D-2004-425, LBA/D-2006-697, MOTLUX-2005-7.

L 175/12

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

5.7.2007

(20)

it is
Therefore, on the basis of the common criteria,
assessed that Volare Aviation does not meet
the
relevant safety standards. This carrier should therefore
be subject to a ban to all its operations and should be
included in Annex A.

(21)

(22)

(23)

(24)

Air carriers from Indonesia

There is verified evidence of serious safety deficiencies on
the part of all air carriers certified in Indonesia. These
deficiencies have been identified by a safety audit report
carried out by Indonesia's
aviation authority
following a succession of accidents, which revealed that
none of the country's air carriers meet relevant safety
standards.

civil

The US Department of Transportation’s Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) lowered Indonesia’s safety rating in
its IASA programme, for the reason that Indonesia fails
to comply with international safety standards set by the
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). Such a
measure amounts effectively to an operating ban on all
carriers
consequence,
Indonesian carriers will not be permitted to commence
service to the United States.

certified by Indonesia. As

a

last

ICAO Universal

The
Safety Oversight Audit
Programme (USOAP) report, as well as its follow-up
report, has indicated serious shortcomings with regard
to the capability of
the civil aviation authorities of
Indonesia to perform their air safety oversight responsi-
bilities.

The competent authorities of Indonesia demonstrated an
insufficient ability to implement and enforce the relevant
safety standard. Furthermore, these authorities did not
reply
timely manner when
concerns about the safety of the operation of carriers
licensed in Indonesia were raised by the Commission.

and in a

adequately

(25)

it is
Therefore, on the basis of the common criteria,
assessed that all air
certified in Indonesia
carriers
should be subject to an operating ban and included in
Annex A.

Air carriers from the Kyrgyz Republic

(26)

The authorities of the Kyrgyz Republic have provided the
Commission with information indicating that
they
granted an Air Operator's Certificate to the following
air carriers: Eastok Avia, Kyrgyz Trans Avia, and S
Group Aviation. Since
are
certified by the authorities of
the Kyrgyz Republic
which have shown a lack of ability to carry out
adequate safety oversight,
they should be included in
Annex A.

these new air

carriers

(27)

(28)

(29)

The authorities of the Kyrgyz Republic have provided the
Commission with evidence of the withdrawal of the Air
Operator's Certificates of the following air carriers: British
Gulf
International Airlines FEZ and Kyrgyz General
Aviation. Since these carriers certified in the Kyrgyz
Republic have consequently ceased their activities, they
should be withdrawn from Annex A.

Air carriers from Albania

last

ICAO Universal

The
Safety Oversight Audit
Programme (USOAP) report, the results of the recent
in the
assessment mission conducted in Albania
the European Common Aviation Area
framework of
(ECAA)
Italy, have
indicated serious
shortcomings with regard to the
capability of the civil aviation authorities of Albania to
perform their air safety oversight responsibilities.

and information provided by

Following the invitation of the Albanian civil aviation
authority, a team of European experts conducted a fact-
finding mission to the Albania from 4 to 8 June 2007.
Its report shows that despite many efforts,
the civil
lack the resources,
aviation authorities of Albania still
legal framework and expertise which are necessary to
allow them to perform their air safety oversight re-
sponsibilities in a satisfactory manner.

(30) With regard to two carriers certified in Albania —
and Belle Air — the
above
Albanian Airlines
are
shows
report
mentioned
safety
operating
in accordance with the
standards and indeed taking additional measures
to
ensure their own safety oversight given the recognised
deficiencies of the national civil aviation authorities.

relevant

carriers

both

that

(31) No serious

safety deficiencies were detected during
several SAFA ramp inspections conducted on aircraft
operated by both carriers to European airports.

(32)

The civil aviation authorities of Albania have agreed to
submit a comprehensive corrective action plan aimed at
addressing all safety oversight deficiencies identified in
the various reports cited above, particularly the report
of the fact-finding mission conducted in Albania by a
team of European experts from 4 to 8 June 2007.

(33)

The Government of Albania has reiterated its full political
commitment towards a sound restructuring programme
for its civil aviation authority and that it will not issue
any further Air Operator Certificates until
the said
programme has been satisfactorily implemented.

5.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 175/13

competent

(34) On the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that
being in compliance with the relevant safety standards,
Albanian Airlines and Belle Air should not be included in
the Community list. The
authorities of
the Commission, within a
Albania should provide
period not
the
necessary information regarding the formulation and
progress in implementation of a corrective action plan.
In addition, Member States intend to ensure further veri-
safety
fication of effective compliance with relevant
standards through systematic ramp inspections on these
carriers.

exceeding three months, with all

Air carriers from Bulgaria

the situation of

(35) As envisaged in recital 35 of Commission Regulation
five Bulgarian
(EC) No 235/2007,
carriers — Air Sofia, Bright Aviation Services, Heli Air
Services, Scorpion Air and Vega Airlines — should be
closely monitored. Accordingly,
aviation
authority of Bulgaria conducted, with the assistance of
experts from the Commission, EASA and Member States,
verification visits of these carriers in order to determine
the appropriate measures as regards
the operational
restrictions imposed on them since 21 February 2007.

civil

the

further notice the operation in the European
until
Community, Switzerland, Norway and Iceland of
the
aircraft of type LET 410 with registration marks LZ-
CCT, LZ-CCS, LZ-CCR, LZ-CCE, LZ-CCF and LZ-LSB.
type LET 410 with registration mark
The aircraft of
LZ-CCP of this carrier is permitted to operate flights
within the Community, as this
the only aircraft
currently equipped with the necessary obligatory safety
(EGPWS and TCAS) and therefore able to
equipment
safe operation within the Community. The
ensure
the situation of
Commission should closely monitor
this
its
corrective action plan with the assistance of EASA and
the Member States.

implementation of

and verify the

carrier

is

(40) With regard to the exercise by the competent authorities
of Bulgaria, the Commission acknowledges the progress
made by the Bulgarian authorities in fulfilling its re-
sponsibilities. The Commission supports the efforts of
the Bulgarian authorities to continue the exercise of
It shall continue monitoring
oversight responsibilities.
this process with the assistance of EASA and the
Member States.

Air carriers from Mauritania

(36)

(37)

(38)

In the light of the results of the visit carried out from 27
May to 2 June, it is assessed that there is verified evidence
of serious safety deficiencies on the part of Air Sofia,
Scorpion Air
Bright Aviation Services,
and Vega
Airlines. The persistence of
these inspection findings
shows systemic safety deficiencies.

the visit has revealed evidence that

Furthermore,
the
carrier Air Scorpio is from a corporate point of view,
administratively, financially and technically managed and
controlled by the carrier Scorpion Air and that aircraft
operated by Air Scorpio for commercial transport were
previously operated and owned by Scorpion Air. There is
verified evidence of serious safety deficiencies on the part
of Air Scorpio.

(41) As envisaged in recital 36 of Commission Regulation
(EC) No 910/2006 of 20 June 2006 (1) a team of
European experts conducted a follow-up mission to
Mauritania from 18 to 21 June 2007 to assess the
progress in the implementation of the new legislation,
requirements and procedures. Its report shows that the
Agence Nationale de l'Aviation Civile (ANAC) is meeting
its obligations and has also continued to develop the
technical
necessary working
procedures to ensure its oversight of the civil aviation
industry.

regulation

and

the

(42)

In addition, Air Mauritanie took the necessary actions to
correct
ramp
inspections carried out at Community airports and
improve its procedures.

deficiencies

identified

through

the

The Commission has taken note of the revocation of the
AOC of Vega Airlines, Bright Aviation, Scorpion Air, and
Air Sofia as well as the suspension of the AOC of Air
Scorpio decided by the competent authorities of Bulgaria
on 21 June 2007. Therefore, as these air carriers cannot
operate any air services, no further action is warranted by
the Commission.

(43) On the basis of the common criteria, it is assessed that
Mauritania has taken the necessary measures to reach an
acceptable level of performance in the discharge of its
oversight obligations to ensure that Mauritanian carriers
comply with international safety standards.

(39)

The Commission has also taken note of the decision by
the competent authorities of Bulgaria on 21 June 2007
to modify the AOC of Heli Air Service by suspending

(1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 910/2006 of 20 June 2006
amending Regulation
the
Community list of air carriers which are subject to an operating
ban within the Community referred to in Chapter II of Regulation
(EC) No 2111/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council
(OJ L 168, 21.6.2006, p. 16).

establishing

474/2006

(EC) No

L 175/14

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

5.7.2007

(44)

(45)

Air carriers from the Republic of Moldova

Jet Line International,

There is verified evidence of serious safety deficiencies on
International
the part of Aeronordgroup, Aeroportul
Marculesti, Grixona,
Jetstream,
and Tiramavia certified in the Republic of Moldova.
These deficiencies have been identified by Belgium,
Croatia, France, Germany,
the
Netherlands, Spain and Turkey during ramp inspections
performed under the SAFA programme. The repetition of
these inspection findings
systemic safety de-
ficiencies (1).

Italy, Lithuania, Malta,

shows

Following the invitation of the civil aviation authority of
the Republic of Moldova, a team of European experts
conducted a fact-finding mission to Moldova from 4 to
8 June 2007. Its report shows that the Moldovan Civil
Aviation Authority has revealed an insufficient ability to
implement and enforce the relevant safety standards in
accordance with their obligations under
the Chicago
Convention, as regards the following carriers: Valan Inter-
national Cargo Charter, Aeronord Group, Grixona,
Jet
Line International,
Jet Stream, Pecotox Air, Aeroportul
International Marculesti, and Tiramavia.

(49)

(50)

(46)

In addition, the eight abovementioned carriers, although
holders of an Air Operator's Certificate (AOC) issued by
the Republic of Moldova, do not have their principal
place of business in the Republic of Moldova, contrary
to the
requirements of Annex 6 to the Chicago
Convention.

(47)

The Commission has taken note that the authorities of
the Republic of Moldova have withdrawn the Air Oper-
ator's Certificates of the above mentioned carriers, which
have consequently ceased their activities.

(48)

the
Furthermore,
authority of the Republic of Moldova has committed

the Commission takes note

that

CAA-NL-2007-4,

CAACRO-2005-3,

(1) BCAA-2006-64, BCAA-2007-9, CAA-NL-2005-227, CAA-NL-2006-
262,
CAAMA-2005-12,
CAIEY-2006-7, DGAC-E-2007-153, DGAC-E-2007-274, DGAC/F-
2005-4, DGAC/F-2005-56, DGAC/F-2005-401, DGAC/F-2005-
626, DGAC/F-2005-810, DGAC/F-2005-1204, DGAC/F-2005-
1221, DGAC/F-2005-1266, DGAC/F-2005-1292, DGAC/F-2005-
1465, DGAC/F-2006-34, DGAC/F-2006-41, DGAC/F-2006-249,
DGAC/F-2006-819,
DGAC/F-2006-465,
DGAC/F-2006-333,
DGAC/F-2007-335,
DGAC/F-2007-207,
DGAC/F-2006-1879,
DGAC/F-2007-748,
DGAC/F-2007-649,
DGAC/F-2007-487,
ENAC-IT-2005-74,
DGCATR-2007-120,
DGCATR-2006-29,
ENAC-IT-2005-148,
ENAC-IT-2005-751,
ENAC-IT-2005-455,
ENAC-IT-2006-74, ENAC-IT-2006-576, LBA/D-2005-672, LBA/D-
2006-14, LBA/D-2006-100.

not to issue any further Air Operator's Certificates until
satisfactory implementation of the corrective action plan
and to consult for such purpose the Commission.

The civil aviation authority of the Republic of Moldova
has agreed to submit by the end of September 2007 a
comprehensive corrective action plan with a roadmap,
aimed at addressing all safety oversight deficiencies ident-
ified during the fact-finding mission conducted in the
Republic of Moldova by a team of European experts
from 4 to 8 June 2007.

In the light of
the various measures taken by the
competent authority of the Republic of Moldova, and
pending the submission of a corrective action plan, the
Commission considers that remaining carriers holder of
an AOC issued by the Republic of Moldova (Air
Moldova, Moldavian Airlines, Tandem Aero and Nobil
Air) should not be included in the Community list. The
Commission should monitor the safety situation of these
carriers. For this purpose, Member States intend to ensure
further verification of effective compliance with the
relevant
ramp
inspection of the aircraft operated by these carriers.

through systematic

standards

safety

Air carriers from the Russian Federation

States

visited

from Member

(51) As envisaged in recitals 36 and 39 of Commission Regu-
lation (EC) No 235/2007, the Commission, assisted by
experts
the Russian
Federation from 15 to 21 April 2007 with a view to
determining the status of implementation of corrective
actions of the carrier Rossyia (ex Pulkovo) and verifying
the situation of the safety of certain other Russian air
carriers subject to operational restrictions by decision of
the competent authorities of the Russian Federation since
12 February 2007 as well as the exercise of oversight
obligations of these authorities.

(52) With regard to the carrier Rossyia, the results of the visit
show that the company is making improvements on the
internal safety oversight procedures and on implementing
ICAO safety standards. Its quality management is under
development. Additional
information was presented by
the competent authorities of the Russian Federation on
26 June 2007. As all corrective actions have not yet been
the carrier should remain under the close
completed,
the competent authorities of Russia to
scrutiny of
monitor the further implementation of
the corrective
action plan.

5.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 175/15

(53) With regard to the nine carriers subject to operational
restrictions by decision of the competent authorities of
the Russian Federation since 12 February 2007,
the
results of
the visit show that overall, all companies
confirmed to be closely supervised since the introduction
of the operating restrictions and the pre-flight author-
isations by the competent authorities. These measures
led in all cases to immediate positive reactions. The
results of the visit also showed that any positive devel-
opments still need to become sustainable solutions and
lead to the introduction of fully fledged internal safety
systems. The competent authorities of
the Russian
Federation decided on 27 April 2007 and informed
thereof
the
restrictions on the following six air carriers: Aero Rent,
and
Gazpromavia, Lukoil, Tatarstan, Atlant Soyuz
Aviacon Zitotrans. The
and
carriers Centre Avia
Russian Sky (Russkoe Nebo) remain as per the same
furthermore,
decision under the operating restrictions;
the pre-flight authorisation system has been extended
to also cover the regular flights operated by UTAir.

the Commission on 2 May 2007 to lift

(54) Also during the visit certain other Russian carriers, Kras-
noyarsky Airlines (1) and Kuban Airlines (2) for which the
Commission had information indicating systemic de-
safety
ficiencies with regard to safety and whose
situation had
the
drawn the
competent authorities of Russia, were discussed. The
measures decided by the latter authorities on 27 April
2007 foresee that pre-flight inspections are intensified on
these carriers.

attention of

also

(55) With regard to the exercise of oversight obligations by
the competent authorities of the Russian Federation, the
results of the visit show that they have to accelerate
further their work to bring the Russian safety rules in
line with ICAO standards
should
concentrate on the implementation of these standards
ICAO safety
and the recommendations of

and that

the last

they

also necessary

to avoid double

for operators
and

audit. Moreover, they should intensify their cooperation
with Russian manufacturers to ensure compliance of
Russian designed aircraft with ICAO standards. This
appears
standards
applying to airworthiness inside the Russian Federation
— one
flying to the
Community,
for
second
operators and aircraft operating inside the Russian
Federation or the CIS. Furthermore, the competent auth-
orities should further increase their efforts with regard to
continued airworthiness and ensure that Western built
aircraft increasingly acquired and operated by Russian
carriers are adequately maintained by the companies
concerned.

and aircraft
(lower)

standard

a

(56)

(57)

(58)

Since the visit to the Russian Federation results of ramp
inspections of all the aforementioned carriers show that
certain carriers among those which were subject
to
operating restrictions have not been operating any
services to the Community.

into the Community

The carriers Gazpromavia and Atlant Soyuz, which were
previously subject to operating restrictions, have been
and have
operating services
undergone ramp inspections (3). The results of
these
inspections indicates a repetition of serious findings in
the same areas as before the imposition of operating
showing systemic safety deficiencies and
restrictions
likely to have
impact on safety of
operations.

significant

a

this

inspection show a repetition of

The carrier UTAir, has also been inspected (4). The
results of
the
inspection findings in the same areas as before the impo-
sition of operating restrictions indicating that the carrier
has
fully completed the corrective actions
proposed in February 2007. These results along with
verified evidence of serious safety deficiencies on the
part of Airlines 400 (5), Kavminvodyavia (6), Ural

still not

(1) ACG-2007-1, ACG-2007-7, CAACRO-2004-35, CAACRO-2004-
37, CAACRO-2004-38, CAACRO-2004-48, CAACRO-2004-50,
CAO-2004-101, DGAC/F-2005-15, DGAC/F-2006-2105, DGAC/F-
2007-477, DGAC/F-2007-481, DGCATR-2006-102, DGCATR-
ENAC-IT-
2007-112,
ENAC-IT-
2004-225,
ENAC-IT-
2004-366,
ENAC-IT-
2004-548,
ENAC-IT-
2005-188,
ENAC-IT-
2005-492,
ENAC-IT-
2006-117,
2006-326,
ENAC-IT-
2006-674, ENAC-IT-2007-9, ENAC-IT-2007-24, ENAC-IT-2007-
53, ENAC-IT-2007-66, ENAC-IT-2007-140, HCAAGR-2006-35,
HCAAGR-2007-66, LBA/D-2006-66, LBA/D-2006-308, LBA/D-
2006-354, OK-2004-4, OK-2004-8.

ENAC-IT-2004-73,
ENAC-IT-2004-237,
ENAC-IT-2004-480,
ENAC-IT-2005-24,
ENAC-IT-2005-205,
ENAC-IT-2005-694,
ENAC-IT-2006-175,
ENAC-IT-2006-403,

ENAC-IT-2004-110,
ENAC-IT-2004-296,
ENAC-IT-2004-487,
ENAC-IT-2005-187,
ENAC-IT-2005-454,
ENAC-IT-2006-34,
ENAC-IT-2006-180,
ENAC-IT-2006-508,

(2) BCAA-2007-27, DGAC/F-2007-474, DGAC/F-2006-246, DGAC/F-
2006-400, DGAC/F-2007-539, DGCATR-2006-79, ENAC-IT-2004-
44, ENAC-IT-2004-494, ENAC-IT-2005-72, ENAC-IT-2005-114,
FOCA-2004-225, LBA/D-2005-261, LBA/D-2006-4, LBA/D-2006-
429, LBA/D-2007-125, LBA/D-2007-134.

(3) Gazpromavia: CAA-NL-2007-43 on 11.5.2007; Atlant Soyuz: CAA-
N-2007-86 on 31.5.2007 and INAC/P-2007-12 on 1.6.2007.
(4) Utair: SDAT-2007-12 on 24.5.2007, LBA/D 2007 — 308 on

19.6.2007.

(5) CAACRO-2004-44,

DGAC-E-2006-853,
DGAC/F-2005-19,
DGAC/F-2006-2008,

DGAC-E-2006-1004,
DGAC/F-2005-883,
DGAC/F-2004-1011,
DGAC/F-2005-1128,
DGAC/F-2007-24,
ENAC-IT-2004-76, ENAC-IT-2004-86, ENAC-IT-2004-216, ENAC-
IT-2004-259, ENAC-IT-2004-277, ENAC-IT-2004-297, ENAC-IT-
2004-298, ENAC-IT-2006-195, ENAC-IT-2006-793, LBA/D-2005-
185, RCAARO-2006-39.

CAIEY-2005-6,

CAACRO-2006-37,

(6) BCAA-2007-25, BCAA-2007-29, CAACRO-2004-36, CAACRO-
CAIEY-2005-8,
2004-46,
DGAC-E-2006-948,
DGAC-E-2006-878,
DGAC-E-2006-877,
DGAC-E-2006-949, DGAC-E-2006-1122, DGAC-E-2006-1501,
ENAC-IT-2004-573,
ENAC-IT-2004-516,
DGAC/F-2006-2102,
ENAC-IT-2005-453,
ENAC-IT-2005-446,
ENAC-IT-2005-313,
ENAC-IT-2006-570,
ENAC-IT-2006-184,
ENAC-IT-2006-545,
ENAC-IT-2006-664,
FOCA-
ENAC-IT-2007-107,
2007-25, LBA/D-2004-431, LBA/D-2007-238.

EST-2006-2,

L 175/16

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

5.7.2007

Airlines (1), Yakutia Airlines (2) were transmitted to the
competent authorities on 29 May and 5 June 2007.

(59)

launched

In view of all the above, on the basis of the common
criteria, the Commission invited the air carriers Atlant
Soyuz, Gazpromavia, UTAir, Krasnoyarsky Airlines,
Kuban Airlines, Airlines 400, Kavminvodyavia, Ural
their obser-
Airlines and Yakutia Airlines to present
vations pursuant Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No
consultations with
2111/2005 and
the
the Russian Federation. On
competent authorities of
submitted by the air
the basis of
those made by the Commission and by the
carriers,
competent authorities of
the
latter decided on 23 June 2007 effective from 25 June,
to impose operating restrictions on 10 carriers until their
safety deficiencies have been resolved to the mutual satis-
faction of both the competent authorities of the Russian
Federation and the Commission.

the Russian Federation,

the observations

(63)

(60) Accordingly, the competent authorities of the Russian
Federation decided to ban all operations
into the
Community of four of the carriers in question: Kavmin-
vodyavia, Kuban Airlines, Yakutia Airlines, Airlines 400.
In particular, Airlines 400 saw its AOC suspended.

(61) Also, they decided to restrict the operations of certain
carriers allowing only specific aircraft to be operated into
the Community: Krasnoyarsky Airlines is allowed to
operate only with the following Boeing 737 EI-DNH,
EI-DNS, EI-DNT, EI-CBQ, EI-CLZ, EI-CLW, Boeing-757
EI-DUC, EI-DUE and Boeing-767 EI-DMH, EI-DMP; Ural
Airlines is allowed to operate only with the following
Airbus A-320 VP-BQY, VP-BQZ; Gazpromavia
is
allowed to operate only with the following Falcon
Mystère 900 RA-09000, RA-09001, RA-09006, RA-
09008; Atlant-Soyuz is allowed to operate only with
the following Boeing 737 VP-BBL, VP-BBM; UTAir is
allowed to operate only with the following ATR 42
VP-BCB, VP-BCF, VP-BPJ, VP-BPK, the following Gulf-
stream IV RA-10201, RA-10202 and the following Tu-
154M RA-85805, RA-85808. Rossyia (ex-Pulkovo) is not
permitted to operate into the Community with the
aircraft IL-62M (RA-86467).

(62)

The Commission takes note of
the
competent authorities of the Russian Federation and in
particular of the fact that any modifications to these

the decision of

(1) ACG-2007-6, CAACRO-2006-27, DGAC-E-2006-873, DGAC/F-
2006-238, DGAC/F-2006-1709, ENAC-IT-2004-318, ENAC-IT-
2006-392,
EST-2006-23,
HCAAGR-2006-27, OK-2005-14, OK-2005-38, OK-2006-9, OK-
2007-3.

ENAC-IT-2007-12,

EST-2006-22,

(2) BCAA-2006-54, DGAC/F-2007-135, ENAC-IT-2004-75 ENAC-IT-
ENAC-IT-

ENAC-IT-2006-864,

ENAC-IT-2006-867,

2006-604,
2007-15.

restrictions can be adopted by these authorities only in
coordination with the Commission. Also, it takes note of
the fact that all Russian air carriers which operate inter-
national services including into the Community, are
in
informed,
significant (category 2) and major (category 3) findings,
if not duly rectified, would lead to the imposition of
operating restrictions by the Russian authorities.

ramp inspection resulting

that

any

the

situation of

In view of the above, the Commission considers that the
the
measures taken by the competent authorities of
Russian Federation are sufficient to redress the serious
safety deficiencies detected in certain carriers in the
short term. In order to ensure that there are adequate
in place ensuring a sustainable
corrective actions put
intends to
these deficiencies,
systemic solution of
above
verify
the
mentioned carriers before any modification of
the
restrictions contained in the decision of the competent
authorities of the Russian Federation of 23 June 2007.
To that end, the Commission intends to carry out a visit
with the assistance of Member States before the next
update of the present Regulation. Member States should
ensure the verification of effective compliance with
ramp
standards
relevant
inspections on all operations of these carriers.

it
safety of

through systematic

safety

the

General considerations concerning carriers which
have ceased activities

(64) As carriers

removed from the list due to declared
cessation of
activities may reappear with another
identity or nationality, the Commission should actively
continue to monitor any transfers and moves related to
these entities.

General considerations concerning the other carriers
included in the list

(65) No evidence of the full

implementation of appropriate
remedial actions by the other carriers included in the
Community list updated on 5 March 2007 and by the
authorities with responsibility for regulatory oversight of
carriers has been communicated to the
these
Commission so far
requests
submitted by the latter. Therefore, on the basis of the
common criteria,
these air carriers
should continue to be subject to an operating ban.

is assessed that

in spite of

specific

air

it

(66)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in
accordance with the opinion of
Safety
Committee,

the Air

5.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 175/17

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

2. Annex B is replaced by Annex B to this Regulation.

Article 1

Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 is amended as follows:

Article 2

1. Annex A is replaced by Annex A to this Regulation.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that
of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 July 2007.

For the Commission

Jacques BARROT
Vice-President

L 175/18

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

5.7.2007

ANNEX A

LIST OF AIR CARRIERS OF WHICH ALL OPERATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO A BAN WITHIN THE
COMMUNITY (1)

Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as
indicated on its AOC (and its trading name, if
different)

Air Operator Certificate (AOC)
Number or Operating Licence
Number

ICAO airline
designation
number

State of the Operator

AIR KORYO

Unknown

KOR

Democratic People's
Republic of Korea (DPRK)

AIR WEST CO. LTD

ARIANA AFGHAN AIRLINES

004/A

009

BLUE WING AIRLINES

SRSH-01/2002

SILVERBACK CARGO FREIGHTERS

Unknown

TAAG ANGOLA AIRLINES

VOLARE AVIATION ENTREPRISE

001

143

All air carriers certified by the auth-
orities with responsibility for regu-
latory oversight of Democratic
Republic of Congo (RDC), with the
exception of Hewa Bora Airways (2),
including,

AWZ

Sudan

AFG

BWI

VRB

Afghanistan

Surinam

Rwanda

DTA

Angola

VRE

—

Ukraine

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

AFRICA ONE

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0114/2006

CFR

AFRICAN AIR SERVICES COMMUTER
SPRL

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0005/2007

Unknown

AIGLE AVIATION

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0042/2006

Unknown

AIR BENI

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0019/2005

Unknown

AIR BOYOMA

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0049/2006

Unknown

AIR INFINI

AIR KASAI

409/CAB/MIN/TC/006/2006

Unknown

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0118/2006

Unknown

AIR NAVETTE

409/CAB/MIN/TC/015/2005

Unknown

AIR TROPIQUES S.P.R.L.

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0107/2006

Unknown

BEL GLOB AIRLINES

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0073/2006

Unknown

BLUE AIRLINES

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0109/2006

BUL

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

5.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 175/19

Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as
indicated on its AOC (and its trading name, if
different)

Air Operator Certificate (AOC)
Number or Operating Licence
Number

ICAO airline
designation
number

State of the Operator

BRAVO AIR CONGO

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0090/2006

Unknown

BUSINESS AVIATION S.P.R.L.

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0117/2006

Unknown

BUTEMBO AIRLINES

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0056/2006

Unknown

CARGO BULL AVIATION

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0106/2006

Unknown

CETRACA AVIATION SERVICE

409/CAB/MIN/TC/037/2005

CER

CHC STELLAVIA

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0050/2006

Unknown

COMAIR

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0057/2006

Unknown

COMPAGNIE AFRICAINE D’AVIATION
(CAA)

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0111/2006

Unknown

DOREN AIR CONGO

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0054/2006

Unknown

EL SAM AIRLIFT

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0002/2007

Unknown

ESPACE AVIATION SERVICE

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0003/2007

Unknown

FILAIR

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0008/2007

Unknown

FREE AIRLINES

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0047/2006

Unknown

GALAXY INCORPORATION

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0078/2006

Unknown

GOMA EXPRESS

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0051/2006

Unknown

GOMAIR

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0023/2005

Unknown

GREAT LAKE BUSINESS COMPANY

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0048/2006

Unknown

I.T.A.B. — INTERNATIONAL TRANS AIR
BUSINESS

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0022/2005

Unknown

KATANGA AIRWAYS

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0088/2006

Unknown

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

L 175/20

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

5.7.2007

Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as
indicated on its AOC (and its trading name, if
different)

Air Operator Certificate (AOC)
Number or Operating Licence
Number

ICAO airline
designation
number

State of the Operator

KIVU AIR

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0044/2006

Unknown

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

LIGNES AÉRIENNES CONGOLAISES

Ministerial signature
(ordonnance 78/205)

LCG

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

MALU AVIATION

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0113/2006

Unknown

MALILA AIRLIFT

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0112/2006

MLC

MANGO AIRLINES

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0007/2007

Unknown

PIVA AIRLINES

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0001/2007

Unknown

RWAKABIKA BUSHI EXPRESS

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0052/2006

Unknown

SAFARI LOGISTICS SPRL

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0076/2006

Unknown

SAFE AIR COMPANY

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0004/2007

Unknown

SERVICES AIR

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0115/2006

Unknown

SUN AIR SERVICES

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0077/2006

Unknown

TEMBO AIR SERVICES

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0089/2006

Unknown

THOM'S AIRWAYS

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0009/2007

Unknown

TMK AIR COMMUTER

409/CAB/MIN/TC/020/2005

Unknown

TRACEP CONGO

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0055/2006

Unknown

TRANS AIR CARGO SERVICE

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0110/2006

Unknown

TRANSPORTS AERIENS CONGOLAIS
(TRACO)

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0105/2006

Unknown

VIRUNGA AIR CHARTER

409/CAB/MIN/TC/018/2005

Unknown

WIMBI DIRA AIRWAYS

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0116/2006

WDA

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

5.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 175/21

Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as
indicated on its AOC (and its trading name, if
different)

Air Operator Certificate (AOC)
Number or Operating Licence
Number

ICAO airline
designation
number

State of the Operator

ZAABU INTERNATIONAL

409/CAB/MIN/TC/0046/2006

Unknown

Democratic Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Equatorial Guinea

All air carriers certified by the auth-
orities with responsibility for regu-
latory oversight of Equatorial Guinea,
including,

EUROGUINEANA DE AVIACION Y
TRANSPORTES

2006/001/MTTCT/DGAC/SOPS

EUG

Equatorial Guinea

GENERAL WORK AVIACION

002/ANAC

GETRA — GUINEA ECUATORIAL DE
TRANSPORTES AEREOS

GUINEA AIRWAYS

UTAGE — UNION DE TRANSPORT
AEREO DE GUINEA ECUATORIAL

739

738

737

All air carriers certified by the auth-
orities with responsibility for regu-
latory oversight of Indonesia, including,

n/a

GET

Equatorial Guinea

Equatorial Guinea

n/a

Equatorial Guinea

UTG

Equatorial Guinea

Indonesia

ADAMSKY CONNECTION AIRLINES

unknown

DHI

Indonesia

AIR TRANSPORT SERVICES

unknown

unknown

Indonesia

BALAI KALIBRASI PENERBANGAN

unknown

unknown

Indonesia

EKSPRES TRANSPORTASI ANTARBENUA unknown

unknown

Indonesia

GARUDA

INDONESIA AIRASIA

KARTIKA AIRLINES

LION MENTARI ARILINES

MANDALA AIRLINES

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

GIA

Indonesia

AWQ

Indonesia

KAE

LNI

Indonesia

Indonesia

MDL

Indonesia

MANUNGGAL AIR SERVICE

unknown

unknown

Indonesia

MEGANTARA

unknown

unknown

Indonesia

MERPATI NUSANTARA AIRLINES

unknown

MNA

Indonesia

METRO BATAVIA

PELITA AIR SERVICE

PT. AIR PACIFIC UTAMA

PT. AIRFAST INDONESIA

PT. ASCO NUSA AIR

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

BTV

PAS

Indonesia

Indonesia

unknown

Indonesia

AFE

Indonesia

unknown

Indonesia

L 175/22

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

5.7.2007

Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as
indicated on its AOC (and its trading name, if
different)

Air Operator Certificate (AOC)
Number or Operating Licence
Number

ICAO airline
designation
number

State of the Operator

PT. ASI PUDJIASTUTI

PT. AVIASTAR MANDIRI

PT. ATLAS DELTASATYA

unknown

unknown

unknown

unknown

Indonesia

unknown

Indonesia

unknown

Indonesia

PT. DABI AIR NUSANTARA

unknown

unknown

Indonesia

PT. DERAYA AIR TAXI

unknown

DRY

Indonesia

PT. DERAZONA AIR SERVICE

unknown

unknown

Indonesia

PT. DIRGANTARA AIR SERVICE

unknown

DIR

Indonesia

PT. EASTINDO

PT. EKSPRES TRANSPORTASI
ANTARBENUA

unknown

unknown

unknown

Indonesia

unknown

Indonesia

PT. GATARI AIR SERVICE

unknown

GHS

Indonesia

PT. GERMANIA TRISILA AIR

unknown

unknown

Indonesia

PT. HELIZONA

unknown

unknown

Indonesia

PT. KURA-KURA AVIATION

unknown

unknown

Indonesia

PT. INDONESIA AIR TRANSPORT

unknown

IDA

Indonesia

PT. INTAN ANGKASA AIR SERVICE

unknown

unknown

Indonesia

PT. NATIONAL UTILITY HELICOPTER

unknown

unknown

Indonesia

PT. PELITA AIR SERVICE

unknown

unknown

Indonesia

PT. PENERBENGAN ANGKASA SEMESTA unknown

unknown

Indonesia

PT. PURA WISATA BARUNA

unknown

unknown

Indonesia

PT. SAMPOERNA AIR NUSANTARA

unknown

unknown

Indonesia

PT. SAYAP GARUDA INDAH

unknown

unknown

Indonesia

PT. SMAC

unknown

SMC

Indonesia

PT. TRANSWISATA PRIMA AVIATION

unknown

unknown

Indonesia

PT. TRAVIRA UTAMA

PT. TRIGANA AIR SERVICE

unknown

unknown

unknown

Indonesia

unknown

Indonesia

REPUBLIC EXPRESS AIRLINES

unknown

RPH

Indonesia

RIAU AIRLINES

SRIWIJAYA AIR

unknown

unknown

RIU

SJY

Indonesia

Indonesia

5.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 175/23

Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as
indicated on its AOC (and its trading name, if
different)

Air Operator Certificate (AOC)
Number or Operating Licence
Number

ICAO airline
designation
number

State of the Operator

SURVEI UDARA PENAS

unknown

PNS

Indonesia

TRANS WISATA PRIMA AVIATION

unknown

unknown

Indonesia

TRAVEL EXPRESS AVIATION SERVICE

unknown

XAR

Indonesia

TRI MG INTRA ASIA AIRLINES

unknown

TMG

Indonesia

TRIGANA AIR SERVICE

WING ABADI AIRLINES

unknown

unknown

All air carriers certified by the auth-
orities with responsibility for regu-
latory oversight of the Kyrgyz
Republic, including,

AIR CENTRAL ASIA

AIR MANAS

ASIA ALPHA AIRWAYS

AVIA TRAFFIC COMPANY

BISTAIR-FEZ BISHKEK

BOTIR AVIA

CLICK AIRWAYS

DAMES

EASTOK AVIA

ESEN AIR

GALAXY AIR

GOLDEN RULE AIRLINES

INTAL AVIA

ITEK AIR

KYRGYZ TRANS AVIA

KYRGYZSTAN

KYRGYZSTAN AIRLINES

MAX AVIA

OHS AVIA

S GROUP AVIATION

34

17

32

23

08

10

11

20

15

2

12

22

27

04

31

03

01

33

09

6

TGN

Indonesia

WON

Indonesia

—

Kyrgyz Republic

AAT

MBB

SAL

AVJ

BSC

BTR

Kyrgyz Republic

Kyrgyz Republic

Kyrgyz Republic

Kyrgyz Republic

Kyrgyz Republic

Kyrgyz Republic

CGK

Kyrgyz Republic

DAM

Kyrgyz Republic

Unknown

Kyrgyz Republic

ESD

GAL

GRS

INL

IKA

KTC

LYN

KGA

MAI

OSH

Kyrgyz Republic

Kyrgyz Republic

Kyrgyz Republic

Kyrgyz Republic

Kyrgyz Republic

Kyrgyz Republic

Kyrgyz Republic

Kyrgyz Republic

Kyrgyz Republic

Kyrgyz Republic

Unknown

Kyrgyz Republic

L 175/24

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

5.7.2007

Name of the legal entity of the air carrier as
indicated on its AOC (and its trading name, if
different)

Air Operator Certificate (AOC)
Number or Operating Licence
Number

ICAO airline
designation
number

State of the Operator

SKY GATE INTERNATIONAL AVIATION

14

SKY WAY AIR

TENIR AIRLINES

TRAST AERO

WORLD WING AVIATION

All air carriers certified by the auth-
orities with responsibility for regu-
latory oversight of Liberia

All air carriers certified by the auth-
orities with responsibility for regu-
latory oversight of Sierra Leone,
including,

21

26

05

35

—

SGD

SAB

TEB

TSJ

Kyrgyz Republic

Kyrgyz Republic

Kyrgyz Republic

Kyrgyz Republic

WWM

Kyrgyz Republic

—

—

Liberia

Sierra Leone

AIR RUM, LTD

Unknown

RUM

Sierra Leone

BELLVIEW AIRLINES (S/L) LTD

Unknown

DESTINY AIR SERVICES, LTD

Unknown

BVU

DTY

Sierra Leone

Sierra Leone

HEAVYLIFT CARGO

Unknown

Unknown

Sierra Leone

ORANGE AIR SIERRA LEONE LTD

Unknown

PARAMOUNT AIRLINES, LTD

Unknown

SEVEN FOUR EIGHT AIR SERVICES LTD Unknown

TEEBAH AIRWAYS

All air carriers certified by the auth-
orities with responsibility for regu-
latory oversight of Swaziland,
including,

AERO AFRICA (PTY) LTD

JET AFRICA SWAZILAND

ROYAL SWAZI NATIONAL AIRWAYS
CORPORATION

SCAN AIR CHARTER, LTD

SWAZI EXPRESS AIRWAYS

SWAZILAND AIRLINK

Unknown

—

Unknown

Unknown

Unknown

Unknown

Unknown

Unknown

ORJ

PRR

SVT

Sierra Leone

Sierra Leone

Sierra Leone

Unknown

Sierra Leone

—

Swaziland

RFC

Swaziland

OSW

Swaziland

RSN

Swaziland

Unknown

Swaziland

SWX

Swaziland

SZL

Swaziland

(1) Air carriers listed in Annex A could be permitted to exercise traffic rights by using wetleased aircraft of an air carrier which is not

subject to an operating ban, provided that the relevant safety standards are complied with.

(2) Hewa Bora Airways is allowed to use the specific aircraft mentioned in Annex B for its current operations within the European

Community.

5.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 175/25

ANNEX B

LIST OF AIR CARRIERS OF WHICH OPERATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO OPERATIONAL RESTRICTIONS
WITHIN THE COMMUNITY (1)

Name of the legal
entity of the air carrier
as indicated on its AOC
(and its trading name, if
different)

Air Operator
Certificate (AOC)
Number

ICAO airline
designation number

State of the
Operator

Aircraft type

Registration mark(s) and,
when available,
construction serial
number(s)

State of registry

AIR BANGLADESH

17

AIR SERVICE
COMORES

06-819/TA-15/
DGACM

BGD

KMD

HEWA BORA
AIRWAYS (HBA) (2)

409/CAB/MIN/TC/
0108/2006

ALX

Bangladesh

B747-269B

S2-ADT

Comoros

All fleet with the
exception of:
LET 410 UVP

Democratic
Republic of
Congo (RDC)

All fleet with the
exception of:
B767-266 ER

PAKISTAN
INTERNATIONAL
AIRLINES

003/96 AL

PIA

Islamic Republic
of Pakistan

All fleet with the
exception of:
all B-777; 3 B-747-
300; 2 B-747-200.
6 A-310

All fleet with the
exception of:
D6-CAM (851336)

All fleet with the
exception of:
9Q-CJD (cons. No
23178)

All fleet with the
exception of:
AP-BHV, AP-BHW,
AP-BGJ, AP-BGK,
AP-BGL, AP-BGY,
AP-BGZ; AP-BFU,
AP-BGG, AP-BFX,
AP-BAK, AP-BAT,
AP-BEU, AP-BGP,
AP-BGR, AP-BGN,
AP-BEC, AP-BEG

Bangladesh

Comoros

Democratic
Republic of
Congo (RDC)

Islamic Republic
of Pakistan

(1) Air carriers listed in Annex B could be permitted to exercise traffic rights by using wetleased aircraft of an air carrier which is not subject to an operating ban, provided

that the relevant safety standards are complied with.

(2) Hewa Bora Airways is only allowed to use the specific aircraft mentioned for its current operations within the European Community.