Case C-328/05 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 May 2007 — SGL Carbon AG v Commission of the European Communities ( Appeals — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Leniency Notice — Principle non bis in idem )
Date: 2007-06-23
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment (EU), appeal, carbon, restriction on competition, restrictive trade practice

C 140/4

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

23.6.2007

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Advocaten voor de Wereld VZW

Defendant: Leden van de Ministerraad

which the Court of First Instance partially dismissed the action
seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2002) 5083 final
of 17 December 2002 relating to a proceeding under Article 81
EC — Cartel in the specialty graphite market

Re:

Preliminary ruling — Arbitragehof — Interpretation of Council
Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the
European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between
Member States (OJ 2002 L 190, p. 1) — Whether compatible
with Article 34(2)(b) EU — Removal of the requirement of
double criminality in respect of the offences listed in Article 2
(2) of the Decision — Whether compatible with Article 6(2) EU

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the appeal;

2. Orders SGL Carbon AG to pay the costs

(1) OJ C 281, 12.11.2005.

affecting

Examination of the questions submitted has revealed no factor capable
of
Framework Decision
2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant
and the surrender procedures between Member States.

Council

validity

the

of

(1) OJ C 271, 29.10.2005.

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 May 2007
the European
— SGL Carbon AG v Commission of

Communities

(Case C-328/05 P) (1)

(Appeals — Competition — Agreements, decisions and
concerted practices — Guidelines on the method of setting
fines — Leniency Notice — Principle non bis in idem)

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 May 2007
(reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster
Gerichtshof — Austria) — Color Drack GmbH v Lexx
International Vertriebs GmbH

(Case C-386/05) (1)

(Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judg-
ments in civil and commercial matters — Regulation (EC) No
44/2001 — Special jurisdiction — First indent of Article 5(1)
(b) — Court for the place of performance of the contractual
obligation in question — Sale of goods — Goods delivered in
different places within a single Member State)

(2007/C 140/07)

Language of the case: German

(2007/C 140/06)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Color Drack GmbH

Appellant: SGL Carbon AG (represented by M. Klusmann and F.
Wiemer, Rechtsanwälte)

Defendant: Lexx International Vertriebs GmbH

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of
Communities
Schneider, W. Mölls and H. Gading, Agents,)

the European
(represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre, M.

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of
the Court of First Instance
(Second Chamber) of 15 June 2005 in SGL Carbon v Commission
in
(Joined Cases T-71/03, T-74/03, T-87/03 and T-91/03),

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Oberster Gerichtshof —
Interpretation of Article 5(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No
44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recogni-
tion and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial
matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1) — Special jurisdiction — Place to
which goods were delivered under a contract of sale — Multiple
places of delivery