Case T-65/07: Action brought on 2 March 2007 — Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol v OHIM — ( 250 )
Date: 2007-04-28
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), pulp and paper industry, trade-mark law

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/51

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative Community trade-
mark ‘tosca de FEDEOLIVA’ for goods and services in classes 16,
29, 35 and 39 Application No 3 467 651

mark (1), inasmuch as, according to the applicant, the designa-
tion ‘350’, in relation to the goods indicated, is neither descrip-
tive nor devoid of distinctive character.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The
applicant

Mark or sign cited: The community and national word marks
‘TOSCA’ for goods and services in class 3 (perfumeries, essential
oils, non-medicated toilet preparations and cosmetics, prepara-
tions for hair, toothpastes, toilet soaps)

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b), 8(2)(c) and 8(5) of
Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (‘CTMR’) and of the essential
procedural requirements enshrined in Articles 43(1), 73 and 74
(1)(2) of the CTMR.

Action brought on 2 March 2007 — Agencja Wydawnicza
Technopol v OHIM — (‘350’)

(Case T-64/07)

(2007/C 95/102)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol, Sp. z o. o. (Często-
chowa, Republic of Poland)
(represented by: D. Rzążewska,
lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market
(Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Form of order sought

— set

aside

in its

entirety

the decision delivered on
21 December 2006 by the Fourth Board of Appeal of the
(Trade
Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market
Marks and Designs) in Case No R 1033/2006-4;

— order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: word mark ‘350’ for goods in
Class 16

Decision of the Examiner: registration refused

Decision of the Board of Appeal: appeal dismissed

Pleas in law: incorrect application of the provisions of Article 7
(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 40/94 on the Community trade

(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 (OJ 1994

L 11, p. 1).

Action brought on 2 March 2007 — Agencja Wydawnicza
Technopol v OHIM — (‘250’)

(Case T-65/07)

(2007/C 95/103)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol, Sp. z o. o. (Często-
chowa, Republic of Poland)
(represented by: D. Rzążewska,
lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market
(Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Form of order sought

— set

aside

in its

entirety

the decision delivered on
21 December 2006 by the Fourth Board of Appeal of the
Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market
(Trade
Marks and Designs) in Case No R 1034/2006-4;

— order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: word mark ‘250’ for goods in
Class 16

Decision of the Examiner: registration refused

Decision of the Board of Appeal: appeal dismissed

Pleas in law: incorrect application of the provisions of Article 7
(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 40/94 on the Community trade
mark (1), inasmuch as, according to the applicant, the designa-
tion ‘250’, in relation to the goods indicated, is neither descrip-
tive nor devoid of distinctive character.

(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 (OJ 1994

L 11, p. 1).