Case T-110/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 7 March 2007 — Sequeira Wandschneider v Commission (Officials — Career development report — Assessment period 2001/2002 — Action for annulment — Statement of reasons — Evaluation of merits — Evidence — Action for damages)
Date: 2007-04-28
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, European official, action for annulment (EU), staff assessment

C 95/38

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

28.4.2007

Operative part of the judgment

3. Orders the Commission to pay all the costs.

The Court:

1. Annuls Article 1 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2229/2003 of
22 December 2003 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and
collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of
silicon originating [in] Russia in so far as it imposes an anti-
dumping duty on the applicant;

2. Orders the Council to bear its own costs and pay those of the appli-

cant;

3. Orders the Commission to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 106, 30.4.2004.

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 7 March 2007
— Sequeira Wandschneider v Commission

(Case T-110/04) (1)

(Officials — Career development report — Assessment period
2001/2002 — Action for annulment — Statement of reasons
— Evaluation of merits — Evidence — Action for damages)

(2007/C 95/75)

Language of the case: French

(1) OJ C 106 of 30.4.2004.

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 8 March 2007
— France Télécom v Commission

(Case T-339/04) (1)

(Competition — Decision ordering an inspection — Loyal
cooperation with the national courts — Loyal cooperation
with the national competition authorities — Article 20(4) of
Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Commission Notice on Coop-
eration within the Network of Competition Authorities —
Statement of reasons — Proportionality)

(2007/C 95/76)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: France Télécom SA,
France) (represented by: H. Calvet and M.-C. Rameau, lawyers)

formerly Wanadoo SA (Paris,

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: É. Gippini Fournier and O. Beynet, Agents)

Parties

Re:

(Brussels, Belgium)
Applicant: Paulo Sequeira Wandschneider
(originally represented by G. Vandersanden and A. Finchelstein,
and then by G. Vandersanden and C. Ronzi, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: G. Berscheid and H. Tserepa-Lacombe, Agents)

Re:

First, an application for annulment of the decision of 23 April
2003 containing the applicant's career development report for
the period 1 July 2001 to 31 December 2002 and, second, an
application for damages

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Annuls the decision of 23 April 2003 containing the applicant's
the period 1 July 2001 to
for

report

career development
31 December 2002;

2. Rejects the action for damages;

Annulment of Commission Decision C (2004) 1929 of 18 May
2004 in Case COMP/C-1.38.916 ordering French Eélécom SA
and all undertakings which it controls directly or indirectly,
including Wanadoo SA and all undertakings controlled directly
to an inspection
or indirectly by Wanadoo SA,
pursuant to Article 20(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003
of 16 December 2003 on the implementation of the rules on
competition laid down in Articles 81 [EC] and 82 [EC] (OJ
2003 L 1, p. 1).

to submit

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the application;

2. Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 262, 23.10.2004.