Case C-203/06: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 January 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Czech Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 93/16/EEC — Doctors — Mutual recognition of diplomas, certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications — Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)
Date: 2007-04-28
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Czechia, European Commission, action for failure to fulfil an obligation, free movement of workers, physician, recognition of diplomas, right of establishment

C 95/14

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

28.4.2007

Re:

Operative part of the judgment

Appeal against the judgment of
the Court of First Instance
(Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 January 2005
in Case T-147/03 Devinlec Développement Innovation Leclerc SA v
Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and
Designs)(OHIM) annulling, upon application by the proprietor
of
figurative mark QUANTIEME for goods in
Classes 14 and 18, Decision R 109/2002-3 of the Third Board
of Appeal of OHIM of 30 January 2003 which annulled the
decision of the Opposition Division refusing registration of the
figurative Community trade mark QUANTUM for goods in
Class 14

the national

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the appeal;

2. Orders T.I.M.E. ART Uluslararasi Saat Ticareti ve diş Ticaret AŞ

to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 121, 20.5.2006.

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 January 2007
— Commission of the European Communities v Czech
Republic

(Case C-203/06) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Direc-
tive 93/16/EEC — Doctors — Mutual
recognition of
diplomas, certificates and other evidence of formal qualifica-
tions — Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

The Court:

1) Declares that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and
administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Direc-
tive 93/16/EEC of 5 April 1993 to facilitate the free movement
of doctors and the mutual recognition of their diplomas, certificates
and other evidence of formal qualifications, the Czech Republic has
failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 44 of that directive;

2) Orders the Czech Republic to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 143, 17.6.2006.

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 March 2007
— Commission of the European Communities v Italian
Republic

(Case C-327/06) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Direc-
tive 2002/14/EC — Establishment of a general framework for
informing and consulting employees in the European Com-
munity — Failure to transpose within the period prescribed)

(2007/C 95/24)

Language of the case: Italian

(2007/C 95/23)

Parties

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: K. Walkerová and H. Støvlbæk, Agents)

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: J. Enegren and L. Pignataro, acting as Agents, acting
as Agents)

Defendant: Italian Republic (represented by: I. Braguglia, acting as
Agent, and M. Massella Ducci Teri, lawyer)

Defendant: Czech Republic (represented by: T. Boček, Agent)

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to have
transposed, within the prescribed period, Council Directive 93/
16/EEC of 5 April 1993 to facilitate the free movement of
doctors and the mutual recognition of their diplomas, certifi-
cates and other evidence of formal qualifications (OJ 1993 L
165, p. 1)

Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to
take all the measures necessary, within the period prescribed, to
comply with Directive 2002/14/EC of the European Parliament
and of the Council of 11 March 2002 establishing a general
framework for informing and consulting employees in the Euro-
pean Community — Joint Declaration of the European Parlia-
ment and of the Council and the Commission on the represen-
tation of workers (OJ 2002 L 80, p. 29).