Case C-126/06: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 January 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Diikitiko Protodikio Tripolis, Greece) — Carrefour — Marinopoulos AE v Nomarkhiaki aftodiikisi Tripolis (Free movement of goods — Article 28 EC — Quantitative restrictions — Measures having equivalent effect — Marketing of frozen bakery products)
Date: 2007-04-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: bakery, bread, interpretation of the law, market approval, product quality

C 82/10

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

14.4.2007

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of
Communities (represented by V.
acting as Agents, and D. Waelbroeck, avocat)

the European
Joris and C. Berardis-Kayser,

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth
Chamber) of 15 November 2005 in Case T-145/04 Righini v
Commission dismissing the action for annulment of the Commis-
sion's decisions to classify the applicant on her entry into
service in Grade A7/3 and, in so far as may be necessary, annul-
ment of the decision of 21 January 2004 rejecting the appli-
cant's complaint.

Operative part of the order

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. Ms Righini is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 74, 25.3.2006.

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 January 2007
(reference for a preliminary ruling from the Diikitiko
Protodikio Tripolis, Greece) — Carrefour — Marinopoulos
AE v Nomarkhiaki aftodiikisi Tripolis

(Case C-126/06) (1)

(Free movement of goods — Article 28 EC — Quantitative
restrictions — Measures having equivalent
effect —
Marketing of frozen bakery products)

(2007/C 82/19)

Language of the case: Greek

Referring court

Diikitiko Protodikio Tripolis

Operative part of the order

Article 28 EC must be interpreted as precluding national legislation
which makes the sale of ‘bake-off’ products subject to the same require-
ments as those applicable to the complete process of manufacturing
and marketing bread and traditional bakery products.

(1) OJ C 108, 6.5.2006.

Order of the Court of 12 December 2006 — Autosalone
Ispra Snc v European Atomic Energy Community

(Case C-129/06 P) (1)

(Appeal — Non-contractual liability of the European Atomic
Energy Community — Overflowing drain — Misinterpreta-
tion of the evidence — Measures of inquiry)

(2007/C 82/20)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Autosalone Ispra Snc (represented by: B. Casu, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Atomic Energy Com-
munity,
the European
Communities (represented by: E. de March, Agent, and A. Dal
Ferro, lawyer)

represented by the Commission of

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of
the Court of First Instance
(Second Chamber) of 30 November 2005 in Case T-250/02
in which the Court of First
Autosalone Ispra v Commission,
Instance dismissed an application for a declaration that
the
Community was liable for the damage allegedly suffered by the
applicant as a result of an overflowing drain the management
and maintenance of which are the responsibility of the Joint
Research Centre in Ispra — Breach of
the procedural rules
concerning the burden of proof

Parties to the main proceedings

Operative part of the order

Applicant: Carrefour — Marinopoulos AE

The Court:

Defendant: Nomarkhiaki aftodiikisi Tripolis

1. Dismisses the appeal;

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Diikitiko Protodikio
Tripolis — Interpretation of Art. 28 EC — Marketing of pre-
cooked bakery products (‘bake-off’ products) — Requirement of
a licence

(1) OJ C 108, 6.5.2006.

2. Orders Autosalone Ispra Snc to pay the costs.