Commission Regulation (EC) No 333/2007 of 28 March 2007 laying down the methods of sampling and analysis for the official control of the levels of lead, cadmium, mercury, inorganic tin, 3-MCPD and benzo(a)pyrene in foodstuffs (Text with EEA relevance )
Date: 2007-03-28
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: food inspection, food standard, foodstuff, public health, toxic substance

29.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 88/29

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 333/2007

of 28 March 2007

laying down the methods of sampling and analysis for the official control of the levels of lead,
cadmium, mercury, inorganic tin, 3-MCPD and benzo(a)pyrene in foodstuffs

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty
Community,

establishing the European

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European
Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on official
controls performed to ensure the verification of compliance
with feed and food law, animal health and animal welfare
rules (1), in particular Article 11(4) thereof,

Whereas:

Council Regulation (EEC) No 315/93 of 8 February 1993
laying down Community procedures for contaminants in
food (2) provides that maximum levels must be set for
certain contaminants in foodstuffs in order to protect
public health.

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 of 19
December 2006 setting maximum levels
for certain
in foodstuffs (3)
contaminants
establishes maximum
levels for
inorganic tin, 3-
lead, cadmium, mercury,
MCPD and benzo(a)pyrene in certain foodstuffs.

official control of the levels of lead, cadmium, mercury
and 3-MCPD in foodstuffs (4), Commission Directive
2004/16/EC of 12 February 2004 laying down the
sampling methods and the methods of analysis for the
official control of the levels of tin in canned foods (5) and
Commission Directive 2005/10/EC of 4 February 2005
laying down the sampling methods and the methods of
analysis for the official control of the levels of benzo(a)-
pyrene in foodstuffs (6), respectively.

Numerous provisions on sampling and analysis for the
official control of the levels of lead, cadmium, mercury,
inorganic tin, 3-MCPD and benzo(a)pyrene in foodstuffs
are similar. Therefore, in the interest of clarity of legis-
lation, it is appropriate to merge those provisions in one
single legislative act.

Directives 2001/22/EC, 2004/16/EC and 2005/10/EC
should therefore be repealed and replaced by a new
Regulation.

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in
accordance with
Standing
Committee for the Food Chain and Animal Health,

opinion

the

the

of

(5)

(6)

(7)

Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 lays down general prin-
ciples for the official control of foodstuffs. However, in
certain cases more specific provisions are necessary to
ensure
are performed in a
controls
harmonised manner in the Community.

that official

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The methods of sampling and analysis to be used for the
official control of levels of lead, cadmium, mercury, 3-
MCPD, inorganic tin and benzo(a)pyrene in certain food-
Commission Directive
in
stuffs
2001/22/EC of 8 March 2001 laying down the
sampling methods and the methods of analysis for the

established

are

(1) OJ L 165, 30.4.2004, p. 1, corrected by OJ L 191, 28.5.2004, p. 1.
(EC)
by

Regulation
Commission
amended
No 1791/2006 (OJ L 363, 20.12.2006, p. 1).

Regulation

as

lead,

cadmium, mercury,

Sampling and analysis for the official control of the levels
1.
of
tin, 3-MCPD and
benzo(a)pyrene listed in sections 3, 4 and 6 of the Annex to
Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 shall be
in
accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.

carried out

inorganic

Paragraph 1 shall

2.
provisions of Regulation (EC) No 882/2004.

apply without prejudice

to the

(2) OJ L 37, 13.2.1993, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC)
No 1882/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ
L 284, 31.10.2003, p. 1).
(3) OJ L 364, 20.12.2006, p. 5.

(4) OJ L 77, 16.3.2001, p. 14. Directive as last amended by Directive

2005/4/EC (OJ L 19, 21.1.2005, p. 50).

(5) OJ L 42, 13.2.2004, p. 16.
(6) OJ L 34, 8.2.2005, p. 15.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

L 88/30

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

29.3.2007

Article 2

Article 3

Directives 2001/22/EC, 2004/16/EC and 2005/10/EC are
hereby repealed.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following
its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

References to the repealed Directives shall be construed as
references to this Regulation.

It shall apply from 1 June 2007.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 March 2007.

For the Commission

Markos KYPRIANOU
Member of the Commission

29.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 88/31

ANNEX

PART A

DEFINITIONS

For the purposes of this Annex, the following definitions shall apply:

‘lot’:

‘sublot’:

an identifiable quantity of food delivered at one time and determined by the official to have
common characteristics, (such as origin, variety, type of packing, packer, consignor or markings).
In the case of fish, also the size of fish shall be comparable;

designated part of a large lot in order to apply the sampling method on that designated part. Each
sublot must be physically separated and identifiable;

‘incremental sample’:

a quantity of material taken from a single place in the lot or sublot;

‘aggregate sample’:

the combined total of all the incremental samples taken from the lot or sublot; aggregate samples
shall be considered as representative of the lots or sublots from which they are taken;

‘laboratory sample’:

a sample intended for the laboratory.

PART B

SAMPLING METHODS

B.1.

GENERAL PROVISIONS

B.1.1.

Personnel

Sampling shall be performed by an authorised person as designated by the Member State.

B.1.2. Material to be sampled

Each lot or sublot which is to be examined shall be sampled separately.

B.1.3.

Precautions to be taken

In the course of sampling, precautions shall be taken to avoid any changes which would affect the levels of
contaminants, adversely affect the analytical determination or make the aggregate samples unrepresentative.

B.1.4.

Incremental samples

As far as possible, incremental samples shall be taken at various places distributed throughout the lot or sublot.
Departure from such procedure shall be recorded in the record provided for under point B.1.8. of this Annex.

B.1.5.

Preparation of the aggregate sample

The aggregate sample shall be made up by combining the incremental samples.

B.1.6.

Samples for enforcement, defence and referee purposes

The samples for enforcement, defence and referee purposes shall be taken from the homogenised aggregate
sample unless this conflicts with the rules of the Member States as regards the rights of the food business
operator.

L 88/32

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

29.3.2007

B.1.7.

Packaging and transmission of samples

Each sample shall be placed in a clean, inert container offering adequate protection from contamination, from
loss of analytes by adsorption to the internal wall of the container and against damage in transit. All necessary
precautions shall be taken to avoid any change in composition of the sample which might arise during
transportation or storage.

B.1.8.

Sealing and labelling of samples

Each sample taken for official use shall be sealed at the place of sampling and identified following the rules of
the Member States.

A record shall be kept of each sampling, permitting each lot or sublot to be identified unambiguously (reference
to the lot number shall be given) and giving the date and place of sampling together with any additional
information likely to be of assistance to the analyst.

B.2.

SAMPLING PLANS

Large lots shall be divided into sublots on condition that the sublot may be separated physically. For products
traded in bulk consignments (e.g. cereals), Table 1 shall apply. For other products Table 2 shall apply. Taking
into account that the weight of the lot is not always an exact multiple of the weight of the sublots, the weight of
the sublot may exceed the mentioned weight by a maximum of 20 %.

The aggregate sample shall be at least 1 kg or 1 litre except where it is not possible e.g. when the sample
consists of 1 package or unit.

The minimum number of incremental samples to be taken from the lot or sublot shall be as given in Table 3.

In the case of bulk liquid products the lot or sublot shall be thoroughly mixed in so far as possible and in so far
it does not affect the quality of the product, by either manual or mechanical means immediately prior to
sampling. In this case, a homogeneous distribution of contaminants is assumed within a given lot or sublot.
It is therefore sufficient to take three incremental samples from a lot or sublot to form the aggregate sample.

The incremental samples shall be of similar weight. The weight of an incremental sample shall be at least 100
grams or 100 millilitres, resulting in an aggregate sample of at least about 1 kg or 1 litre. Departure from this
method shall be recorded in the record provided for under point B.1.8. of this Annex.

Subdivision of lots into sublots for products traded in bulk consignments

Table 1

Lot weight (ton)

≥ 1 500

> 300 and < 1 500
≥ 100 and ≤ 300

< 100

Weight or number of sublots

500 tonnes

3 sublots

100 tonnes

—

Table 2

Subdivision of lots into sublots for other products

Lot weight (ton)

Weight or number of sublots

≥ 15

< 15

15 to 30 tonnes

—

29.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 88/33

Minimum number of incremental samples to be taken from the lot or sublot

Table 3

Weight or volume of lot/sublot (in kg or litre)

Minimum number of incremental samples to be taken

< 50
≥ 50 and ≤ 500

> 500

3

5

10

If the lot or sublot consists of individual packages or units, then the number of packages or units which shall be
taken to form the aggregate sample is given in Table 4.

Number of packages or units (incremental samples) which shall be taken to form the aggregate sample if
the lot or sublot consists of individual packages or units

Table 4

Number of packages or units in the lot/sublot

Number of packages or units to be taken

≤ 25

26 to 100

> 100

at least one package or unit

about 5 %, at least two packages or units

about 5 %, at maximum 10 packages or units

The maximum levels for inorganic tin apply to the contents of each can, but for practical reasons it is necessary
to use an aggregate sampling approach. If the result of the test for an aggregate sample of cans is less than, but
close to, the maximum level of inorganic tin and if it is suspected that individual cans might exceed the
maximum level, then it might be necessary to conduct further investigations.

B.3.

SAMPLING AT RETAIL STAGE

Sampling of foodstuffs at retail stage shall be done where possible in accordance with the sampling provisions
set out in points B.1. and B.2. of this Annex.

Where this is not possible, an alternative method of sampling at retail stage may be used provided that it ensures
sufficient representativeness for the sampled lot or sublot.

PART C

SAMPLE PREPARATION AND ANALYSIS

C.1.

LABORATORY QUALITY STANDARDS

Laboratories shall comply with the provisions of Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 (1).

Laboratories shall participate in appropriate proficiency testing schemes which comply with the ‘International
Harmonised Protocol for the Proficiency Testing of (Chemical) Analytical Laboratories’ (2) developed under the
auspices of IUPAC/ISO/AOAC.

Laboratories shall be able to demonstrate that they have internal quality control procedures in place. Examples of
these are the ‘ISO/AOAC/IUPAC Guidelines on Internal Quality Control in Analytical Chemistry Laboratories’ (3).

(1) As amended by Article 18 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2076/2005 (OJ L 338, 22.12.2005, p. 83).
(2) ‘The international harmonized protocol for the proficiency testing of analytical chemistry laboratories’ by M. Thompson, S.L.R. Ellison

and R. Wood, Pure Appl. Chem., 2006, 78, 145-96.

(3) Edited by M. Thompson and R. Wood, Pure Appl. Chem., 1995, 67, 649-666.

L 88/34

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

29.3.2007

Wherever possible the trueness of analysis shall be estimated by including suitable certified reference materials in
the analysis.

C.2.

SAMPLE PREPARATION

C.2.1.

Precautions and general considerations

The basic requirement is to obtain a representative and homogeneous laboratory sample without introducing
secondary contamination.

All of the sample material received by the laboratory shall be used for the preparation of the laboratory sample.

Compliance with maximum levels laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 shall be established on the basis
of the levels determined in the laboratory samples.

C.2.2.

Specific sample preparation procedures

C.2.2.1. S p e c i f i c p r o c e d u r e s f o r l e a d , c a d m i u m , m e r c u r y a n d i n o r g a n i c t i n

The analyst shall ensure that samples do not become contaminated during sample preparation. Wherever
possible, apparatus and equipment coming into contact with the sample shall not contain those metals to be
determined and be made of inert materials e.g. plastics such as polypropylene, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) etc.
These should be acid cleaned to minimise the risk of contamination. High quality stainless steel may be used for
cutting edges.

There are many satisfactory specific sample preparation procedures which may be used for the products under
consideration. Those described in the CEN Standard ‘Foodstuffs — Determination of
trace elements —
Performance criteria, general considerations and sample preparation’ (1) have been found to be satisfactory but
others may be equally valid.

In the case of inorganic tin, care shall be taken to ensure that all the material is taken into solution as losses are
known to occur readily, particularly because of hydrolysis to insoluble hydrated Sn(IV) oxide species.

C.2.2.2. S p e c i f i c p r o c e d u r e s f o r b e n z o ( a ) p y r e n e

The analyst shall ensure that samples do not become contaminated during sample preparation. Containers shall
be rinsed with high purity acetone or hexane before use to minimise the risk of contamination. Wherever
possible, apparatus and equipment coming into contact with the sample shall be made of inert materials such as
aluminium, glass or polished stainless steel. Plastics such as polypropylene or PTFE shall be avoided because the
analyte can adsorb onto these materials.

C.2.3.

Treatment of the sample as received in the laboratory

The complete aggregate sample shall be finely ground (where relevant) and thoroughly mixed using a process
that has been demonstrated to achieve complete homogenisation.

C.2.4.

Samples for enforcement, defence and referee purposes

The samples for enforcement, defence and referee purposes shall be taken from the homogenised material unless
this conflicts with the rules of the Member States on sampling as regards the rights of the food business
operator.

(1) Standard EN 13804:2002, ‘Foodstuffs — Determination of trace elements — Performance criteria, general considerations and sample

preparation’, CEN, Rue de Stassart 36, B-1050 Brussels.

29.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 88/35

C.3.

METHODS OF ANALYSIS

C.3.1. Definitions

The following definitions shall apply:

‘r’ =

’ =

‘sr
‘RSDr

’ =

‘R’ =

’ =

‘sR
‘RSDR

’ =

‘LOD’ =

‘LOQ’ =

repeatability conditions

Repeatability the value below which the absolute difference between single test results obtained
under
same
laboratory, and short interval of time) may be expected to lie within a specific probability
(typically 95 %) and hence r = 2,8 × sr.

same apparatus,

same operator,

same sample,

(i.e.,

Standard deviation calculated from results generated under repeatability conditions.

Relative standard deviation calculated from results generated under repeatability conditions
[(sr/

) × 100].

Reproducibility the value below which the absolute difference between single test results obtained
under reproducibility conditions (i.e., on identical material obtained by operators in different
laboratories, using the standardised test method), may be expected to lie within a certain prob-
ability (typically 95 %); R = 2,8 × sR.

Standard deviation, calculated from results under reproducibility conditions.

Relative standard deviation calculated from results generated under reproducibility conditions
[(sR/

) × 100].

Limit of detection, smallest measured content, from which it is possible to deduce the presence
of the analyte with reasonable statistical certainty. The limit of detection is numerically equal to
three times the standard deviation of the mean of blank determinations (n > 20).

Limit of quantification, lowest content of the analyte which can be measured with reasonable
statistical certainty.
If both accuracy and precision are constant over a concentration range
around the limit of detection, then the limit of quantification is numerically equal to six or
10 times the standard deviation of the mean of blank determinations (n > 20).

‘HORRATr

’ = The observed RSDr divided by the RSDr value estimated from the Horwitz equation (1) using the

assumption r = 0,66R.

‘HORRATR

’ = The observed RSDR value divided by the RSDR value calculated from the Horwitz equation.

‘u’ =

‘U’ =

‘Uf’ =

Standard measurement uncertainty.

The expanded measurement uncertainty, using a coverage factor of 2 which gives a level of
confidence of approximately 95 % (U = 2u).

Maximum standard measurement uncertainty.

C.3.2. General requirements

Methods of analysis used for food control purposes shall comply with the provisions of points 1 and 2 of Annex
III to Regulation (EC) No 882/2004.

Methods of analysis for total tin are appropriate for official control on inorganic tin levels.

For the analysis of lead in wine, Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2676/90 (2) lays down the method to be used
in chapter 35 of its Annex.

C.3.3.

Specific requirements

C.3.3.1. P e r f o r m a n c e c r i t e r i a

Where no specific methods for the determination of contaminants in foodstuffs are prescribed at Community
level, laboratories may select any validated method of analysis (where possible, the validation shall include a
certified reference material) provided the selected method meets the specific performance criteria set out in
Tables 5 to 7.

(1) M. Thompson, Analyst, 2000, 125, 385-386.
(2) OJ L 272, 3.10.1990, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1293/2005 (OJ L 205, 6.8.2005, p. 12).

L 88/36

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

29.3.2007

Performance criteria for methods of analysis for lead, cadmium, mercury and inorganic tin

Table 5

Applicability

LOD

LOQ

Precision

Recovery

Specificity

Field blanks

Recovery

LOD

LOQ

Precision

Applicability

LOD

LOQ

Precision

Recovery

Specificity

Parameter

Value/Comment

Foods specified in Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006

less

For inorganic tin less than 5 mg/kg.
For other elements
maximum level
except
if
100 μg/kg. For the latter,
maximum level

the
in Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006,
for lead is less than
less than one fifth of the

than one tenth of

the maximum level

For inorganic tin less than 10 mg/kg.
For other elements less than one fifth of the maximum
level in Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006, except if the
maximum level for lead is less than 100 μg/kg. For the
latter, less than two fifth of the maximum level

HORRATr or HORRATR values of less than 2

The provisions of point D.1.2. apply

Free from matrix or spectral interferences

Table 6

Performance criteria for methods of analysis for 3-MCPD

Criterion

Recommended Value

Concentration

Less than the LOD

75 to 110 %

5 μg/kg (or less) on a dry matter
basis

10 μg/kg (or less) on a dry matter
basis

< 4 μg/kg

< 6 μg/kg

< 7 μg/kg

< 8 μg/kg

< 15 μg/kg

Table 7

—

all

—

20 μg/kg

30 μg/kg

40 μg/kg

50 μg/kg

100 μg/kg

Performance criteria for methods of analysis for benzo(a)pyrene

Parameter

Value/Comment

Foods specified in Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006

Less than 0,3 μg/kg

Less than 0,9 μg/kg

HORRATr or HORRATR values of less than 2

50 to 120 %

Free from matrix or spectral interferences, verification
of positive detection

29.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 88/37

C.3.3.2.

‘ F i t n e s s - f o r - p u r p o s e ’ a p p r o a c h
Where a limited number of fully validated methods of analysis exist, alternatively, a ‘fitness-for-purpose’ approach
may be used to assess the suitability of the method of analysis. Methods suitable for official control must
produce results with standard measurement uncertainties less than the maximum standard measurement uncer-
tainty calculated using the formula below:

q

ﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃ
ðLOD=2Þ2 þ ðαCÞ2

Uf ¼

where:

Uf is the maximum standard measurement uncertainty (μg/kg);

LOD is the limit of detection of the method (μg/kg);

C is the concentration of interest (μg/kg);

α is a numeric factor to be used depending on the value of C. The values to be used are given in Table 8.

Numeric values to be used for α as constant in formula set out in this point, depending on the

concentration of interest

Table 8

C (μg/kg)

≤ 50

51 to 500

501 to 1 000

1 001 to 10 000

> 10 000

α

0,2

0,18

0,15

0,12

0,1

PART D

REPORTING AND INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS

D.1.

REPORTING

D.1.1.

Expression of results

The results shall be expressed in the same units and with the same number of significant figures as the maximum
levels laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006.

D.1.2. Recovery calculations

If an extraction step is applied in the analytical method, the analytical result shall be corrected for recovery. In
this case the level of recovery must be reported.

In case no extraction step is applied in the analytical method (e.g. in case of metals), the result may be reported
uncorrected for recovery if evidence is provided by ideally making use of suitable certified reference material that
the certified concentration allowing for the measurement uncertainty is achieved (i.e. high accuracy of the
measurement). In case the result is reported uncorrected for recovery this shall be mentioned.

L 88/38

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

29.3.2007

D.1.3. Measurement uncertainty

The analytical result shall be reported as x +/– U whereby x is the analytical result and U is the expanded
measurement uncertainty, using a coverage factor of 2 which gives a level of confidence of approximately 95 %
(U = 2u).

The analyst shall note the ‘Report on the relationship between analytical results, measurement uncertainty,
recovery factors and the provisions in EU food and feed legislation’ (1).

D.2.

INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS

D.2.1. Acceptance of a lot/sublot

The lot or sublot is accepted if the analytical result of the laboratory sample does not exceed the respective
maximum level as laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 taking into account the expanded measurement
uncertainty and correction of the result for recovery if an extraction step has been applied in the analytical
method used.

D.2.2. Rejection of a lot/sublot

The lot or sublot is rejected if the analytical result of the laboratory sample exceeds beyond reasonable doubt the
respective maximum level as laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 taking into account the expanded
measurement uncertainty and correction of the result for recovery if an extraction step has been applied in the
analytical method used.

D.2.3. Applicability

The present interpretation rules shall apply for the analytical result obtained on the sample for enforcement. In
case of analysis for defence or reference purposes, the national rules shall apply.

(1) http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/food/chemicalsafety/contaminants/sampling_en.htm