do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-7/07: Action brought on 15 January 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v French Republic
Date: 2007-03-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Commission, France, action for failure to fulfil an obligation, copyright, national implementing measure, sale

24.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/5

2. Does the work to modify the infrastructure of an existing
airport with a view to adapting it to a projected increase in
the number of nighttime and daytime flights, without exten-
sion of the runway, correspond to the notion of a “project”,
for which an impact assessment is required within the terms
of Articles 1, 2 and 4 of Council Directive 85/337/EEC of
27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain
public and private projects on the environment, as applic-
able before its amendment by Council Directive 97/11/EC of
3 March 1997?

3. Since a projected increase in the activity of an airport is not
directly referred to in the annexes to Directive 85/337/EEC,
must
take
the Member State in question nevertheless
account of that increase when examining the potential envir-
onmental effect of modifications made to the infrastructures
of that airport with a view to adapting it for that increase in
activity?’

(1) OJ L 175, p. 40.
(2) OJ L 73, p. 5.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposition of Directive 2003/110/EC expired
on 5 December 2005.

(1) OJ L 321, 2003, p. 26.

Action brought on 15 January 2007 — Commission of the
European Communities v French Republic

(Case C-7/07)

(2007/C 69/09)

Language of the case: French

Action brought on 11 January 2007 — Commission of the
European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium

Parties

(Case C-3/07)

(2007/C 69/08)

Language of the case: French

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: W. Wils, Agent)

Defendant: French Republic

Form of order sought

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: M. Condou-Durande and R. Troosters, Agents)

Defendant: Kingdom of Belgium

— declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and
administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive
2001/84/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
of 27 September 2001 on the resale right for the benefit of
the author of an original work of art (1) and, in any event by
failing to communicate those provisions to the Commission,
the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under
that directive;

— order the French Republic to pay the costs.

Form of order sought

Pleas in law and main arguments

— declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and
administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council
Directive 2003/110/EC of 25 November 2003 on assistance
in cases of transit for the purposes of removal by air (1) and,
in any event by failing to communicate those provisions to
the Commission, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil
its obligations under that directive;

— order the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

The period for transposition of Directive 2001/84/EC expired
on 31 December 2005.

(1) OJ L 272, 2001, p. 32.
Case C-81/07: Action brought on 14 February 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic
Date: 2007-03-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Commission, Greece, action for failure to fulfil an obligation, harbour installation, national implementing measure, pollution from ships, vessel, waste management

C 69/16

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

24.3.2007

Action brought on 14 February 2007 — Commission of
the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

Action brought on 14 February 2007 — Commission of
the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-81/07)

(2007/C 69/37)

Language of the case: Greek

(Case C-83/07)

(2007/C 69/38)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: G. Zavvos and K. Simonsson)

Defendant: the Hellenic Republic

Form of order sought

The Court is asked to:

— declare that, by not developing, approving and imple-
menting waste reception and handling plans for ship-gener-
ated waste and cargo residues, the Hellenic Republic has
failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 5(1) and 16(1)
of Directive 2000/59/EC of the European Parliament and of
the Council of 27 November 2000 on port reception facil-
ities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues (1);

— order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: M. Konstantinidis and J.-B. Laignelot)

Defendant: the Hellenic Republic

Form of order sought:

The Court is asked to:

— declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and
administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive
2004/12/EC (1) of
the
Council of 11 February 2004 amending Directive 94/62/EC
on packaging and packaging waste, and in any event by
failing to inform the Commission thereof,
the Hellenic
Republic has infringed its obligations under that directive;

the European Parliament and of

Pleas in law and main arguments

— order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

The time-limit
national law expired on 28 December 2000.

for

transposing Directive 2000/59/EC into

(1) OJ L 332, 28.12.2000, p. 81.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit
for
national law expired on 18.8.2005.

transposing Directive 2004/12/EC into

(1) OJ L 47, 18.2.2004, p. 26.