European Parliament resolution of 15 March 2007 on compliance with the Charter of Fundamental Rights in the Commission's legislative proposals: methodology for systematic and rigorous monitoring (2005/2169(INI))
Date: 2007-03-15
Institutions: Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, European Parliament
Subjects: EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, EU control, European Commission, drafting of EU law, fundamental rights, proposal (EU)

13.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301 E/229

Thursday 15 March 2007

33.
Emphasises the need for the international community to speak with one voice in BiH; regrets the
recent announcement by the incumbent EU High Representative/Special Representative of his intention to
step down in June 2007 and commends the work he has carried out during his mandate; urges the Council
to hold an in-depth debate on the nature, scope and duration of the international presence in BiH;

34.
Is also of the opinion that, when the OHR eventually closes down, the EU must provide strong and
coordinated support to help BiH to achieve its long-term aim of European integration as quickly and thor-
oughly as possible; considers that the EU Special Representative must speak up forcefully on behalf of the
European Union inter alia when coordinating all the institutions and agencies of the EU in BiH;

35.
Instructs its President to forward this recommendation to the General Affairs Council and, for infor-
mation, to the Commission, the EU Special Representative/High Representative for Bosnia and Herzegovina
and the governments and parliaments of Bosnia and Herzegovina, of the Republika Srpska and of the
Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

P6_TA(2007)0078

Compliance with the Charter of Fundamental Rights

European Parliament resolution of 15 March 2007 on compliance with the Charter of Fundamental
Rights in the Commission's legislative proposals: methodology for systematic and rigorous
monitoring (2005/2169(INI))

The European Parliament,

— having regard to the Commission Communication on Compliance with the Charter of Fundamental

Rights in Commission legislative proposals (COM(2005)0172),

— having regard to Articles 6 and 7 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU),

— having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (1) proclaimed in Nice on

7 December 2000,

— having regard to the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe (the constitutional treaty) signed in
Rome on 29 October 2004, which incorporates the provisions of the Charter of Fundamental Rights,
in order to make them legally binding,

— having regard to its resolution of 20 April 2004 on the Commission communication on Article 7 of
the Treaty on European Union: Respect for and promotion of the values on which the European Union
is based (2),

— having regard to its resolution of 26 May 2005 on promotion and protection of fundamental rights:

the role of national and European institutions, including the Fundamental Rights Agency (3),

— having regard to the 2005 Annual Report on the situation of fundamental rights in the European

Union, drawn up by the EU network of independent experts,

— having regard to Council Regulation(EC) No 168/2007 of 15 February 2007) establishing a European
Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (4) and the Declaration by the Council on Police and Judicial
Cooperation in Criminal Matters,

(1) OJ C 364, 18.12.2000, p. 1.
(2) OJ C 104 E, 30.4.2004, p. 408.
(3) OJ C 117 E, 18.5.2006, p. 242.
(4) OJ L 53, 22.2.2007, p. 1.

C 301 E/230

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

13.12.2007

Thursday 15 March 2007

— having regard to the speech by Mr José Manuel Barroso, in his then capacity as President-designate of

the Commission, at Parliament's plenary sitting of 17 November 2004,

— having regard to Rules 45, 34 and 91 of its Rules of Procedure,

— having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the

opinion of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs (A6-0034/2007),

A. whereas the Union is based on the principles of freedom, democracy, respect for human rights and for
fundamental freedoms as well as on the rule of law, these principles being common to all Member
States (Article 6 of the TEU),

B. whereas Parliament, as the directly elected representative of the citizens of the Union, has a particularly

prominent responsibility in the realisation of these principles,

C. whereas this responsibility is all the greater because, as the Treaties currently stand:

— the right of individuals to bring an action directly before the European courts remains very lim-

ited (1),

— collective action is not possible,

— in a number of fields, even the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice is limited (cf. Title IV of the EC
Treaty and Article 35 of the TEU) or even non-existent (second pillar — Title V of the TEU (2)),

which makes it all the more necessary for the European legislature to take care when legislating on
matters which might affect the protection of fundamental rights,

D. whereas a procedure for checking the compatibility of all

legislative proposals with the Charter of
Fundamental Rights is one of the necessary consequences which have arisen from the adoption of the
Charter by Parliament, the Council, the Commission and all the Member States, as well as from the
formal proclamation to EU citizens on 7 December 2000 in Nice,

E. whereas the effective scope of fundamental rights arising from the application of Article 6(2) of the
TEU is to this day primarily the product of case-law, but whereas the European legislature should also
explicitly state how these rights should be interpreted,

F. whereas, by adopting the Charter of Fundamental Rights, Parliament, the Council and the Commission
agreed on definitions of these rights and whereas, for obvious reasons of consistency and good faith,
they should in future refer to them when drafting EC legislation (cf. the above-mentioned Commission
Communication COM(2005)0172)),

G. whereas, once incorporated in the law of the Union, the rights defined in the Charter acquire binding

force by virtue of the EC law based thereon,

H. whereas the systematic nature, thoroughness, objectivity, openness and transparency of the procedure
for compliance with fundamental rights in legislative proposals are made all the more important by the
fact that, regrettably, the Charter of Fundamental Rights has so far not been made legally binding;
whereas over the years the Charter has nonetheless become a reference text for European courts such
as the Court of First Instance, the Court of Justice (3), the European Court of Human Rights in Stras-
bourg and numerous constitutional courts,

(1)

Judgment of the Court of 25 July 2002 in Case C-50/00, Unión de Pequeños Agricultores v Council of the European
Union, [2002] ECR I-6677.

(2) Order of the Court of First Instance of 7 June 2004 in Case T-338/02, Segi et al. v Council of the European Union,

[2004] ECR II-1647.

(3) Case C-540/03 of 27 June 2006, European Parliament v Council of the European Union, on the right to family reunifica-

tion for minor children of third-country nationals (Directive 2003/86/EC).

13.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301 E/231

Thursday 15 March 2007

I. whereas, when making a prior assessment of the impact which new EC legislation will have on funda-
mental rights, the European legislature should take account of the views of national legislatures, civil
society, academia and the expertise of other international organisations such as the Council of Europe
and the United Nations; whereas in this way the European legislature would promote the development
of an ever more widespread culture of fundamental rights, as was the case when certain acts were
drafted relating to the protection of private life, the right to family life and the right to transparency,

J. whereas the Commission's proposal on the consolidation and better public awareness of the procedure,
for compliance with fundamental rights in legislative proposals, which came into force in 2001, repre-
sents clear progress in its project to develop a genuine ‘fundamental rights culture’ in the European
Union,

K. whereas, however, this procedure is too introverted, the criteria are too restrictive and Parliament's role
is not sufficient, and whereas the proposals on the integration of Member State parliaments, such as
that of the British House of Lords (1), remain unconsidered, as does the much-needed continuous dia-
logue between the European institutions and collaboration with independent organisations, with a view
to increased objectivity,

L. whereas a genuine ‘fundamental rights culture’ in the Union requires the development of an overall
system for monitoring fundamental rights, which should include the Council and decisions in the
field of intergovernmental cooperation,

M. whereas a true ‘fundamental rights culture’ consists not only of passive compliance with the rules, but
also of active promotion of fundamental rights and intervention in cases of violation or unsatisfactory
protection of fundamental rights by the Member States,

N. whereas an overall system for monitoring fundamental rights must provide for an annual debate invol-
ving the three institutions and national parliaments, particularly when Parliament reviews the progress
made and the problems encountered in the development of the EU as an area of freedom, security and
justice,

O. whereas in such a debate it would be possible to consider:

— the annual report of the Fundamental Rights Agency,

— a specific report by the Commission as part of its general report on the implementation of Com-

munity law,

— a report by the Council on the aspects which it regards as having been significant in the past year

with reference to respect for fundamental rights in the Union and by its Member States,

P. whereas on the occasion of these annual debates the institutions should review the desirability of revis-

ing legislation which has restricted the exercise of freedoms on public security grounds,

Q. whereas the existence of secret prisons and the illegal kidnappings by the CIA as part of counter-
terrorism operations, the dilatory investigation and lack of cooperation on the part of several govern-
ments, or the transfer of airline passenger data and bank account data by SWIFT without legal basis
only serve to undermine the confidence of citizens in the ability and will of the European institutions
to protect fundamental rights and to punish infractions,

Points to the historical task,

in ‘creating an ever closer Union’ (Article 1 of the TEU), of creating
1.
instruments for freedom alongside the development of instruments for security and justice and for eco-
nomic and social progress;

Stresses the need to overcome the crisis in the constitutional process, to preserve the central achieve-

2.
ments of the constitutional treaty, and to establish the Charter of Fundamental Rights as legally binding;

(1) House of Lords, European Union Committee, 16th Report, Session 2005-06, ‘Human Rights Proofing EU Legislation’,

29 November 2005, paragraph 149.

C 301 E/232

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

13.12.2007

Thursday 15 March 2007

3. Welcomes the Commission's proposals on the consolidation and improved transparency of the pro-
cedure on compliance with fundamental rights in its legislative proposals and considers this to be the first
positive result of the ambitious measures on the protection of fundamental rights announced in Parliament
by Commission President José Manuel Barroso on 17 November 2004, and the working parties set up by
him to this end;

Calls on the Commission to make the monitoring process more transparent and to consult with

4.
relevant actors in civil society, particularly those potentially affected by the Commission proposal;

Stresses that the Commission's proposed ‘systematic’ monitoring makes it absolutely necessary for

5.
every legislative proposal to be thoroughly checked and for the result to be substantiated;

6.
Calls on the Commission to check the compliance of legislative proposals not only with the Charter of
Fundamental Rights, but also with all European and international instruments regarding fundamental rights
and with the rights derived from the constitutional traditions common to the Member States, as general
principles of EC law;

7.
Stresses that genuinely systematic and rigorous protection of fundamental rights calls not only for
scrutiny to identify any legal errors in weighing up the respective importance of the freedom of the indi-
vidual and the requirements of the public interest, but also for political analysis on every occasion to
ascertain which of the various solutions that weigh up these interests correctly produces the best balance
between determination of the objective and restriction of fundamental rights (optimisation in terms of
fundamental rights);

8.
Considers it desirable that scrutiny should concentrate on the fundamental rights specifically affected
in each case, and considers it essential to state these on each occasion explicitly and individually in recitals;

Hopes that specific, practical ways can be found of applying the stated methods by means of which

9.
the Commission intends to implement the Charter of Fundamental Rights in its legislative proposals;

10.
Points out that systematic internal monitoring to ensure compliance with fundamental rights when
legislative proposals are being drawn up must be the subject of an explanatory report which provides legal
grounds for compliance with such rights;

11.
Calls on the Commission to think over its decision to divide its considerations on fundamental rights
into the current three categories in its impact assessment — economic, social and environmental effects —
and to create a specific category entitled ‘Effects on fundamental rights’, to ensure that all aspects of funda-
mental rights are considered;

Underlines the Commission's right, throughout the legislative process, to withdraw its proposal

12.
before it is approved by the Council, if there are changes which violate a fundamental right;

Rejects the Commission's reservations on bringing annulment proceedings ‘on the basis of case-by-
13.
case political scrutiny’ and strongly emphasises the absolute priority of the protection of fundamental rights
and freedoms over all political considerations;

Considers it necessary to extend the procedure on compliance with the Charter of Fundamental
14.
Rights to the entire legislative process and to the comitology system, to strengthen the position of Parlia-
ment, to make the role of the Fundamental Rights Agency more precise and to call more frequently on its
support;

15.
Contemplates the possibility of amending to this end Rule 34 of its Rules of Procedure, so as to
entrust the Committee on Civil Liberties with the task of monitoring the consequences of legislative propo-
sals, measures and regulations relevant to fundamental rights, and also of amending Rules 91 and 115 of its
Rules of Procedure so that Parliament's resolutions can also apply to Member State affairs, enabling it to
fulfil its responsibility pursuant to Articles 6 and 7 of the TEU at an early stage;

13.12.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301 E/233

Thursday 15 March 2007

16.
Points out that, even though general consultation procedures exist, independent external bodies and
organisations which are specifically concerned with fundamental rights issues must be more extensively
involved; to that end, calls on the Commission to devise a specific arrangement for enabling such bodies
and organisations to be consulted during the procedure for drafting legislative proposals which have an
impact on fundamental rights;

17.
Calls on the Council to strengthen the systematic monitoring of fundamental rights also in areas
covered by intergovernmental cooperation, to publish the results and likewise to secure the support of the
Fundamental Rights Agency;

18.
Reaffirms that Parliament and other European Union institutions may benefit, within the framework
of the legislative procedure, as appropriate and on a voluntary basis, from the expertise on fundamental
rights acquired by the Fundamental Rights Agency, as well as in the areas of police and judicial cooperation;

19.
Neither the Treaties nor Regulation (EC) No 168/2007 preclude the possibility of Parliament seeking
the assistance of the Fundamental Rights Agency when implementing Article 7 of the TEU; expects that the
Commission and the Fundamental Rights Agency will provide in the multi-annual framework, as well as in
the annual work programme, for the necessary financial and human resources, so that the Fundamental
Rights Agency can respond adequately to requests from Parliament when exercising its powers according
to Article 7 of the TEU;

Stresses the importance of establishing suitable means of communicating with and informing the
20.
general public and the EU institutions concerning the internal monitoring of the compliance with funda-
mental rights, including by drawing up periodic reports on the subject;

Requests Member State parliaments, in particular in the fields of police and judicial cooperation and
21.
the common foreign and security policy, to verify the compatibility of all decisions and measures with the
Charter of Fundamental Rights, so that the indivisibility of fundamental rights is preserved and the systema-
tic and thorough monitoring of fundamental rights in all the Union's policies can be ensured;

22.
Calls on the Council and the Commission, pursuant to Article 4 of the TEU and Articles 200 and
212 of the EC Treaty, to submit a yearly report on the fundamental rights policy of the Union to Parliament
and the national parliaments, and to engage in a systematic, open and permanent dialogue on the safe-
guarding of fundamental rights in the Union;

Calls on the Commission and the Council to report to Parliament on the follow-up given to the

23.
reports by the network of national experts;

Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and Commission, and the govern-

24.
ments and parliaments of the Member States and of the candidate countries.

P6_TA(2007)0079

Negotiation of an EU-Central America Association Agreement

European Parliament recommendation of 15 March 2007 to the Council on the negotiating mandate
for an association agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part,
and the countries of Central America, of the other part (2006/2222(INI))

The European Parliament,

— having regard to the proposal for a recommendation to the Council by Willy Meyer Pleite on behalf of
the GUE/NGL Group, on the guidelines for the negotiation of an Association Agreement between the
European Union and Central America (B6-0417/2006),