Case C-527/06: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden lodged on 27 December 2006 — R.H.H. Renneberg v Staatssecretaris van Financiën
Date: 2007-03-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: interpretation of the law, tax relief, tax system, taxable income

C 56/20

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

10.3.2007

(b) the prohibition of restrictions on the freedom of establish-
ment of nationals of a Member State in the territory of
another Member State (first paragraph of Article 43 EC),

(c) the requirement of necessity under Article 7(e) of Directive
95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of
24 October 1995 on the protection of
individuals with
regard to the processing of personal data and on the free
movement of such data (1)?

(1) OJ L 281, 1995, p. 31.

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der
Nederlanden lodged on 27 December 2006 — R.H.H.
Renneberg v Staatssecretaris van Financiën

(Case C-527/06)

(2007/C 56/35)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Simvoulio tis
Epikratias (Greece) lodged on 29 December 2006 — Emm.
G. Lianakis AE, Sima Anonimi Techniki Etairia Meleton kai
Epivlepseon and Nikolaos Vlachopoulos v Dimos Alexan-
droupolis, Planitiki A.E., Aikaterini Georgoula, Dim. Vasios,
N. Loukatos & Sinergates Anonimi Etairia Meleton,
Eratosthenis Meletitiki A.E., A. Pantazis — Pan. Kirio-
poulou & Sinergates (‘Filon’) O.E. and Nikolaos Sideris

(Case C-532/06)

(2007/C 56/36)

Language of the case: Greek

Referring court

Simvoulio tis Epikratias (Council of State)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Emm. G. Lianakis AE, Sima Anonimi Techniki Etairia
Meleton kai Epivlepseon and Nikolaos Vlachopoulos

Defendants: Dimos Alexandroupolis, Planitiki A.E., Aikaterini
Georgoula, Dim. Vasios, N. Loukatos & Sinergates Anonimi
Etairia Meleton, Eratosthenis Meletitiki A.E., A. Pantazis — Pan.
Kiriopoulou & Sinergates (‘Filon’) O.E. and Nikolaos Sideris

Question referred

If the tender notice for the award of a contract for services
makes provision only for the order of priority of the award
criteria, without stipulating the weighting factors for each
criterion, does Article 36 of Directive 92/50/EEC (1) relating to
the coordination of the procedures for the award of public
service contracts allow criteria to be weighted by the evaluation
committee at a later date and, if so, under what conditions?

Appellant: R.H.H. Renneberg

(1) OJ L 209, 24.7.1992, p. 1.

Respondent: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Question referred

Must Articles 39 EC and 56 EC be interpreted as precluding,
either individually or jointly, a situation in which a taxpayer
in his country of residence, has (on balance) negative
who,
income from a dwelling owned and occupied by him and
obtains all of his positive income, specifically work-related
income, in a Member State other than that in which he resides
is not permitted by that other Member State (the State of
employment) to deduct the negative income from his taxed
work-related income, even though the State of employment
does allow its own residents to make such a deduction?

Reference for a preliminary ruling from Court of Appeal
(United Kingdom) made on 28 December 2006 — 02 Hold-
ings Limited & 02 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK
Limited

(Case C-533/06)

(2007/C 56/37)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Court of Appeal