Case T-173/05: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 13 December 2006 — Heus v Commission (Officials — Access to an internal competition — Competition notice — Condition relating to length of service — Action for annulment — Principle of non-discrimination)
Date: 2006-12-30
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, European official, action by staff, competition (EU), regulations for civil servants, staff assessment

C 331/40

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

30.12.2006

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 29 November
2006 — Campoli v Commission

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 13 December
2006 — Heus v Commission

(Case T-135/05) (1)

(Officials — Pensions — Weighting calculated by reference to
the average cost of living in the country of residence — Tran-
sitional arrangements set up by the new Staff Regulations of
Officials from 1 May 2004 — Act adversely affecting an offi-
cial — Objection of illegality — Legitimate expectations —
Legal certainty — Equal treatment)

(Case T-173/05) (1)

(Officials — Access to an internal competition — Competi-
tion notice — Condition relating to length of service —
Action for annulment — Principle of non-discrimination)

(2006/C 331/88)

Language of the case: French

(2006/C 331/87)

Parties

Language of the case: French

Applicant: Martine Heus (Anderlecht, Belgium) (represented by:
L. Vogel, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: L. Lozano Palacios and K. Herrmann, Agents)

Parties

Re:

Applicant: Franco Campoli
sented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Jaume, lawyers)

(London, United Kingdom)

(repre-

Principally, application for annulment of the decision not to
admit the applicant to competition COM/PC/04.

Operative part of the judgment

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: V. Joris and H. Tserepa-Lacombe, Agents)

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action.

Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European
Union (represented by: M. Arpio Santacruz and I. Sulce, Agents)

2. Orders each of the parties to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 182, 23.7.2005.

Re:

In essence, annulment of the applicant's pension statements of
May to July 2004 in so far as they apply for the first time a
weighting calculated illegally by reference to the average cost of
living in the applicant's country of residence, and no longer in
relation to the cost of living in the capital of that country.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action.

Order of the Court of First Instance of 22 November 2006
— Cámara de Comercio e Industria de Zaragoza v Commis-
sion

(Case T-225/02) (1)

(European Social Fund — Regulation (EEC) No 4253/88 —
Withdrawal of financial aid — Action for annulment —
Directly concerned — Inadmissibility)

(2006/C 331/89)

Language of the case: Spanish

2. Orders each of the parties to bear its own costs.

Parties

(1) OJ C 132, 28.5.2005.

Applicant: Cámara de Comercio e Industria de Zaragoza
(Zaragoza, Speain) (represented by:
initially A. Sánchez-Rubio
García, then A. Creus Carreras and B. Uriarte Valiente, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: L. Escobar Guerrero and L. Flynn, Agents)