Case T-225/02: Order of the Court of First Instance of 22 November 2006 — Cámara de Comercio e Industria de Zaragoza v Commission (European Social Fund — Regulation (EEC) No 4253/88 — Withdrawal of financial aid — Action for annulment — Directly concerned — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2006-12-30
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: EU initiative, European Social Fund, action for annulment (EU), information processing, information system, teaching, visual arts

C 331/40

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

30.12.2006

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 29 November
2006 — Campoli v Commission

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 13 December
2006 — Heus v Commission

(Case T-135/05) (1)

(Officials — Pensions — Weighting calculated by reference to
the average cost of living in the country of residence — Tran-
sitional arrangements set up by the new Staff Regulations of
Officials from 1 May 2004 — Act adversely affecting an offi-
cial — Objection of illegality — Legitimate expectations —
Legal certainty — Equal treatment)

(Case T-173/05) (1)

(Officials — Access to an internal competition — Competi-
tion notice — Condition relating to length of service —
Action for annulment — Principle of non-discrimination)

(2006/C 331/88)

Language of the case: French

(2006/C 331/87)

Parties

Language of the case: French

Applicant: Martine Heus (Anderlecht, Belgium) (represented by:
L. Vogel, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: L. Lozano Palacios and K. Herrmann, Agents)

Parties

Re:

Applicant: Franco Campoli
sented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Jaume, lawyers)

(London, United Kingdom)

(repre-

Principally, application for annulment of the decision not to
admit the applicant to competition COM/PC/04.

Operative part of the judgment

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: V. Joris and H. Tserepa-Lacombe, Agents)

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action.

Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European
Union (represented by: M. Arpio Santacruz and I. Sulce, Agents)

2. Orders each of the parties to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 182, 23.7.2005.

Re:

In essence, annulment of the applicant's pension statements of
May to July 2004 in so far as they apply for the first time a
weighting calculated illegally by reference to the average cost of
living in the applicant's country of residence, and no longer in
relation to the cost of living in the capital of that country.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action.

Order of the Court of First Instance of 22 November 2006
— Cámara de Comercio e Industria de Zaragoza v Commis-
sion

(Case T-225/02) (1)

(European Social Fund — Regulation (EEC) No 4253/88 —
Withdrawal of financial aid — Action for annulment —
Directly concerned — Inadmissibility)

(2006/C 331/89)

Language of the case: Spanish

2. Orders each of the parties to bear its own costs.

Parties

(1) OJ C 132, 28.5.2005.

Applicant: Cámara de Comercio e Industria de Zaragoza
(Zaragoza, Speain) (represented by:
initially A. Sánchez-Rubio
García, then A. Creus Carreras and B. Uriarte Valiente, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: L. Escobar Guerrero and L. Flynn, Agents)

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/41

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Decision C (2000) 2621
of 29 December 2000 relating to the withdrawal of aid which
was allocated by the European Social Fund (ESF) by application
of Decision C (91) 2852 of 19 December 1991 adopting the
Community initiative ‘Euroform’ for Spain (P.O. 913051ES8)
and ESF funds which the Spanish authorities allocated to the
Cámara de Comercio e Industria (Chamber of Commerce), Zara-
goza, for the ‘Tricoin’ project (ref.: EUR-82), for the implementa-
tion of which the company Copy Aragón de Zaragoza was
responsible.

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

2. Cámara de Comercio e Industria de Zaragoza is ordered to pay the

costs.

(1) OJ C 233, 28.9.2002.

Order of the Court of First Instance of 22 November 2006
— Milbert and Others v Commission

(Case T-434/04) (1)

(Officials — Promotion — 2003 promotion procedure —
Refusal of promotion — Award of promotion points —
Action for annulment — Legal interest in bringing proceed-
ings — Manifest inadmissibility)

(2006/C 331/90)

Language of the case: French

Parties

(Hesperange, Luxembourg),

Applicants: Alex Milbert
Imre
Czigàny (Rhode-Saint-Genèse, Belgium), José Manuel De la Cruz
Gonzalez
(Brussels, Belgium), Viviane Deveen (Overijse,
Belgium), Mohammad Reza Fardoom (Roodt-sur-Syre, Luxem-
bourg), Laura Gnemmi
(Hünsdorf, Luxembourg), Marie-José
Reinard (Bertrange, Luxembourg), Vassilios Stergiou (Kraainem,
Belgium) and Ioannis Terezakis (Brussels) (represented by: initi-
ally G. Bounéou and F. Frabetti, lawyers, then F. Frabetti)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: G. Berscheid and H. Krämer, Agents)

tive, for annulment of the allocation of promotion points made
under the 2003 procedure in relation to the applicants

Operative part of the order

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 6, 8.1.2005.

Order of the Court of First Instance of 22 November 2006
— Sanchez Ferriz v Commission

(Case T-436/04) (1)

(Officials — Promotion — 2003 promotion procedure —
Refusal of promotion — Award of promotion points —
Action for annulment — Legal interest in bringing proceed-
ings — Manifest inadmissibility)

(2006/C 331/91)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Carlos Sanchez Ferriz (Brussels, Belgium) (represented
by: initially G. Bounéou and F. Frabetti, lawyers, then F. Frabetti)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: G. Berscheid and H. Krämer, Agents)

Re:

Application, first, for annulment of the list of officials promoted
to a higher grade under the 2003 promotion procedure, in so
far as that list does not contain the applicant's name, and, inci-
dentally,
the formal measures leading to that decision and,
secondly, in the alternative, for annulment of the allocation of
promotion points made under the 2003 procedure in relation
to the applicant

Operative part of the order

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

Re:

Application, first, for annulment of the list of officials promoted
under the 2003 promotion procedure, in so far as that list does
not contain the applicants' names, and, incidentally, the formal
measures leading to that decision and, secondly, in the alterna-

(1) OJ C 6, 8.1.2005.