do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Council Decision of 18 December 2006 appointing Italian, Maltese and Swedish members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers
Date: 2006-12-18
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Italy, Malta, Sweden, advisory committee (EU), appointment of staff, free movement of workers

C 320/4

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

28.12.2006

COUNCIL DECISION

of 18 December 2006

appointing Italian, Maltese and Swedish members and alternate members of

the Advisory

Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers

(2006/C 320/03)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 of 15 October 1968 on freedom of movement for
workers within the Community (1), and in particular Articles 26 and 27 thereof,

Having regard to the lists of candidates submitted to the Council by the Governments of the Member States,

Whereas:

(1)

By its Decision of 15 September 2006 (2) the Council appointed the members and alternate members
of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers for the period from 14 September
2006 to 13 September 2008, with the exception of the Italian and Maltese members and alternate
members and the Swedish member in the government representatives category,

(2)

The Italian, Maltese and Swedish Governments have submitted candidates for the seats to be filled,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The following are hereby appointed members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on
Freedom of Movement for Workers for the term of office ending on 13 September 2008:

I. GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES

Country

Members

Alternates

Mr Giuseppe Maurizio SILVERI
Mr Augusto VACCARO

Ms Lea BATTISTONI

Ms Johanna PEYRON

Mr Anthony BUTTIGIEG

II. WORKERS' REPRESENTATIVES

Country

Members

Alternates

Ms Ornella CILONA
Mr Giuseppe CASUCCI

Mr Andrew MIZZI
Mr Martin BALZAN

Mr Vincenzo COPPOLA

Mr Stephen FAVA

Italy

Malta

Sweden

Italy

Malta

(1) OJ L 257, 18.10.1968, p. 2.
(2) OJ C 242, 7.10.2006, p. 1.

28.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/5

III. EMPLOYERS' REPRESENTATIVES

Country

Members

Alternates

Italy

Malta

Mr Massimo MARCHETTI
Ms Gaetana PAGANO

Mr Joseph MONTEBELLO
Mr Tonio FARRUGIA

Ms Donata TIRELLI

Mr Joseph FARRUGIA

Done at Brussels, 18 December 2006.

For the Council

The President

J.-E. ENESTAM
Action brought on 18 December 2006 by the EFTA Surveillance Authority against the Principality of Liechtenstein (Case E-6/06)
Date: 2006-12-18
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: EFTA Court, EU law - national law, European Economic Area, Liechtenstein, noise pollution, supervisory body

29.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/49

Action brought on 18 December 2006 by the EFTA Surveillance Authority against the Principality
of Liechtenstein

(Case E-6/06)

(2007/C 72/24)

An action against the Principality of Liechtenstein was brought before the EFTA Court on 18 December
2006 by the EFTA Surveillance Authority, represented by Niels Fenger and Lorna Young, acting as Agents of
the EFTA Surveillance Authority, 35, Rue Belliard, B-1040 Brussels.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

1. Declare that by failing to adopt, or to notify the Authority of, the measures necessary to implement the
Act referred to at point 32g of Annex XX to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (Directive
2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 relating to the assessment and
management of environmental noise), as adapted to the EEA Agreement by Protocol 1 thereto, within the
time limit prescribed, the Principality of Liechtenstein has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 14
of that Act and Article 7 EEA, and

2. Order the Principality of Liechtenstein to bear the costs of the proceedings.

Legal and factual background and pleas in law adduced in support:

— The case concerns the non-implementation of the environmental noise directive.

— In the pre-litigation phase, Liechtenstein has not disputed that, by the expiry of the time limit, it had not

taken the measures necessary to ensure implementation of the directive.
2006/956/EC,Euratom: Council Decision of 18 December 2006 amending the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities with regard to languages
Date: 2006-12-18
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: General Court (EU), administrative procedure, official language, operation of the Institutions

29.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 386/45

COUNCIL DECISION

of 18 December 2006

amending the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities with
regard to languages

(2006/956/EC, Euratom)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Having regard to Article 64 of the Protocol on the Statute of the
Court of Justice,

In accordance with the procedure referred to in the second para-
graph of Article 245 of the Treaty establishing the European
Community and the second paragraph of Article 160 of the
Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community,

Having regard to the request of the Court of Justice,

Having regard to the Opinion of the European Parliament of
13 December 2006,

Having regard to the opinion of
12 December 2006,

the Commission of

Article 1

The Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance of the Euro-
pean Communities of 2 May 1991 (OJ L 136, 30.5.1991, p. 1.
Corrigendum in OJ L 317 of 19.11.1991, p. 34), as amended on
15 September 1994 (OJ L 249, 24.9.1994, p. 17), 17 Febru-
ary 1995 (OJ L 44, 28.2.1995, p. 64), 6 July 1995 (OJ L 172,
22.7.1995, p. 3), 12 March 1997 (OJ L 103, 19.4.1997, p. 6.
Corrigendum in OJ L 351, 23.12.1997, p. 72), 17 May 1999
(OJ L 135, 29.5.1999, p. 92), 6 December 2000 (OJ L 322,
19.12.2000, p. 4), 21 May 2003 (OJ L 147, 14.6.2003, p. 22),
19 April 2004 (OJ L 132, 29.4.2004, p. 3), 21 April 2004
(OJ L 127, 29.4.2004, p. 108) and 12 October 2005 (OJ L 298,
15.11.2005, p. 1) are hereby amended as follows:

Article 35(1) shall be replaced by the following:

‘1.
The language of a case shall be Bulgarian, Czech, Danish,
Dutch, English, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hun-
garian, Irish, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Portu-
guese, Romanian, Slovak, Slovene, Spanish or Swedish.’.

Whereas on the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and of
Romania, Bulgarian and Romanian become official languages of
the European Union and whereas those languages should be
added to the list of languages of the case set out in the Rules of
Procedure,

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect at the same time as the Treaty con-
cerning the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and of Roma-
nia to the European Union.

The texts of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance in Bulgarian and Romanian
shall be adopted after the entry into force of the Treaty referred to in the first paragraph.

Done at Brussels, 18 December 2006.

For the Council
The President
J.-E. ENESTAM
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1874/2006 of 18 December 2006 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2006-12-18
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: agri-monetary policy, citrus fruit, fruit vegetable, import price, pip fruit

L 360/62

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

19.12.2006

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1874/2006

of 18 December 2006

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and
vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty
Community,

establishing the European

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of
21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the
fruit and vegetables (1), and in
import arrangements
particular Article 4(1) thereof,

for

Whereas:

standard values for imports from third countries,
in
respect of the products and periods stipulated in the
Annex thereto.

(2)

In compliance with the above criteria,
the standard
import values must be fixed at the levels set out in the
Annex to this Regulation,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regu-
lation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex
hereto.

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 lays down, pursuant to the
outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade nego-
tiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 19 December 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 December 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY
Director-General for Agriculture and
Rural Development

(1) OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regu-

lation (EC) No 386/2005 (OJ L 62, 9.3.2005, p. 3).

19.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 360/63

to Commission Regulation of 18 December 2006 establishing the standard import values for determining the
entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

ANNEX

CN code

0702 00 00

0707 00 05

0709 90 70

0805 10 20

0805 20 10

0805 20 30, 0805 20 50, 0805 20 70,
0805 20 90

0805 50 10

0808 10 80

0808 20 50

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

(EUR/100 kg)

052
204
999

052
204
628
999

052
204
999

052
388
999

052
204
999

052
624
999

052
528
999

388
400
404
720
999

052
400
720
999

116,5
77,8
97,2

126,3
51,8
155,5
111,2

119,8
66,1
93,0

59,9
72,8
66,4

30,7
63,3
47,0

66,4
71,7
69,1

56,8
35,6
46,2

107,5
94,3
94,2
72,5
92,1

63,8
101,3
50,2
71,8

(1) Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 750/2005 (OJ L 126, 19.5.2005, p. 12). Code ‘999’ stands for ‘of

other origin’.
2006/955/EC,Euratom: Decision of the Council of 18 December 2006 amending the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice of the European Communities as regards the language arrangements
Date: 2006-12-18
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Court of Justice of the European Union, administrative procedure, official language, operation of the Institutions

L 386/44

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

29.12.2006

DECISION OF THE COUNCIL

of 18 December 2006

amending the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice of the European Communities as regards the
language arrangements

(2006/955/EC, Euratom)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Having regard to Article 64 of the Statute of the Court of Justice,

In accordance with the procedure referred to in the second para-
graph of Article 245 of the Treaty establishing the European
Community and the second paragraph of Article 160 of the
Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community,

Having regard to the request of the Court of Justice,

Having regard to the opinion of
12 December 2006,

the Commission of

Having regard to the Opinion of the European Parliament of
13 December 2006,

Article 1

The Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice of the European
Communities of 19 June 1991 (OJ L 176, 4.7.1991, p. 7. Corri-
gendum: OJ L 383, 29.12.1992, p. 117), as amended on 21 Feb-
ruary 1995 (OJ L 44, 28.2.1995, p. 61), 11 March 1997
(OJ L 103, 19.4.1997, p. 1. Corrigendum: OJ L 351, 23.12.1997,
p. 72), 16 May 2000 (OJ L 122, 24.5.2000, p. 43), 28 Novem-
ber 2000 (OJ L 322, 19.12.2000, p. 1), 3 April 2001 (OJ L 119,
27.4.2001, p. 1), 17 September 2002 (OJ L 272, 10.10.2002,
p. 24. Corrigendum: OJ L 281, 19.10.2002, p. 24), 8 April 2003
(OJ L 147, 14.6.2003, p. 17), 19 April 2004 (OJ L 132,
29.4.2004, p. 2), 20 April 2004 (OJ L 127, 29.4.2004, p. 107),
12 July 2005 (OJ L 203, 4.8.2005, p. 19) and 18 October 2005
(OJ L 288, 29.10.2005, p. 51) are hereby amended as follows:

Article 29(1) shall be replaced by the following:

‘1.
The languages of a case shall be Bulgarian, Czech, Danish,
Dutch, English, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hun-
garian, Irish, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Portu-
guese, Romanian, Slovak, Slovene, Spanish, or Swedish.’.

Whereas with the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and
Romania, Bulgarian and Romanian will become official
lan-
guages of the European Union and whereas those languages
should be included in those listed in the Rules of Procedure as
the languages of a case,

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect at the same time as the Treaty con-
cerning the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania
to the European Union.

The texts of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice in Bulgarian and Romanian shall be
adopted after the entry into force of the Treaty referred to in paragraph 1.

Done at Brussels, 18 December 2006.

For the Council
The President
J.-E. ENESTAM