Case T-503/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 19 October 2006 — Pessoa e Costa v Commission (Compliance with a judgment of the Court of First Instance — Interinstitutional transfer to the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) — Refusal — Effect on disciplinary proceedings)
Date: 2006-12-16
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, European official, action by staff, reassignment, regulations for civil servants

16.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/15

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 17 October
2006 — Armour Pharmaceutical v OHIM — Teva Pharma-
ceutical Industries Ltd (GALZIN)

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 17 October
2006 — Hammarplast v OHIM — Steninge Slott
(STENINGE SLOTT)

(Case T-483/04) (1)

(Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Appli-
cation for Community word mark GALZIN — Earlier
national word mark CALSYN — Relative ground for refusal
— Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of goods and signs
— Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article
43(2) and (3) of Regulation No 40/94 — Findings of OHIM
— Admissibility)

(2006/C 310/28)

Language of the case: French

Parties

(Case T-499/04) (1)

(Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Appli-
cation for Community word mark STENINGE SLOTT —
Earlier word mark STENINGE KERAMIK — Likelihood of
confusion)

(2006/C 310/29)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Hammarplast AB (Tingsryd, Sweden) (represented by:
R. Almaraz Palmero, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market
(Trade Marks and Designs)
(represented by: A. Folliard-
Monguiral, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM,
Instance: Steninge Slott AB
intervener before the Court of First
(Märast, Sweden) (represented by: M. Björkenfeldt, lawyer)

Applicant: Armour Pharmaceutical Co. (Bridgewater, New Jersey
United States) (represented by: R. Gilbey, lawyer)

Re:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market
(Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Pétrequin, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd (Jerusalem, Israel)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of
Appeal of OHIM of 25 October 2004 (Case R 394/2003-2)
concerning the opposition filed by the holder of the national
trade mark STENINGE KERAMIK against registration of the
Community trade mark STENINGE SLOTT.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of
Appeal of OHIM of 7 September 2004 (Case R 295/2003-4)
relating to opposition proceedings between Armour Pharma-
ceutical Co. and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd

(1) OJ C 57 of 05.03.2005.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office
(Trade Marks and

for Harmonisation in the Internal Market
Designs) (OHIM) of 7 September 2004 (Case R 295/2003-4);

2. Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by

the applicant.

(1) OJ C 69, 19.3.2005.

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 19 October
2006 — Pessoa e Costa v Commission

(Case T-503/04) (1)

(Compliance with a judgment of the Court of First Instance
— Interinstitutional transfer to the European Monitoring
Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) —
Refusal — Effect on disciplinary proceedings)

(2006/C 310/30)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: José Pedro Pessoa e Costa (Brussels, Belgium) (repre-
sented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal)

C 310/16

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

16.12.2006

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: J. Currall and F. Clotuche-Duvieusart, Agents)

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of 9 October 2003
by which the Director General of the Commission 'Personnel
and administration' Directorate General refused to transfer the
applicant to the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and
Drug Addiction (EMCDDA).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders each party to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 57, 5.3.2005.

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 October
2006 — Castell del Remei v OHIM — Bodegas Roda
(ODA)

(Case T-13/05) (1)

(Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings —
Earlier international word mark RODA and earlier national
word marks BODEGAS RODA, RODA I and RODA II —
Application for a Community word mark ODA — Likelihood
of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2006/C 310/31)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Application for annulment of the decision of the First Board of
Appeal of OHIM of 27 October 2004 (Case R 691/2003-1),
concerning opposition proceedings between Bodegas Roda SA
and Castell del Remei, SL.

Operative part of the judgment

1. The action is dismissed;

2. The applicant is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 69, 19.3.2005.

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 10 October
2006 — Armacell v OHIM — nmc (ARMAFOAM)

(Case T-172/05) (1)

(Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Appli-
cation to register Community word mark ARMAFOAM —
Earlier Community word mark NOMAFOAM — Relative
ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity
of products and signs — Argument concerning the similarity
of goods raised for the first time before the Court of First
Instance)

(2006/C 310/32)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Armacell Enterprise GmbH (Münster, Germany)
(represented by: O. Spuhler, lawyer,)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market
(Trade Marks and Designs)
(represented by: A. Folliard-
Monguiral, Agent)

Applicant: Castell del Remei, SL (Castell del Remei, Spain)
(represented by: J. Grau Mora, A. Angulo, M. Baylos Morales,
A. Velázquez Ibánez, F. de Visscher, E. Cornu, É. De Gryse, D.
Moreau and P. Merino Baylos, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM
intervening before the Court of First Instance: nmc SA (Raeren-
Eynatten, Belgium) (represented by: P. Péters and T. de Haan,
lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market
(Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. García Murillo,
Agent)

Re:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM,
intervener before the Court of First Instance: Bodegas Roda, SA (La
Rioja, Spain) (represented by: M. López Camba, lawyer)

Action against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of
OHIM of 23 February 2005 (Case R 552/2004-1) concerning
opposition proceedings between nmc SA and Armacell Enter-
prise GmbH.