Joined Cases T-432/03 and T-95/05: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 17 October 2006 — Dehon v Parliament (Officials — Vacant post — Compliance with a judgment of the Court of First Instance annulling an appointment decision — Article 29(1) of the Staff Regulations — Organisation of an internal competition)
Date: 2006-12-16
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Parliament, European civil service, action for annulment (EU), competition (EU), regulations for civil servants

16.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/11

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 24 October
2006 — Ritek and Prodisc Technology v Council

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 10 October
2006 — PTV v OHIM (map&guide)

(Case T-274/02) (1)

(Dumping — Recordable
compact discs originating in
Taiwan — Determination of the dumping margin — Choice
of the asymmetrical method of calculation — Pattern of
export prices which differ according to the purchasers,
regions or periods — ‘Zeroing’ technique)

(2006/C 310/18)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ritek Corp (Hsin-Chu, Taiwan) and Prodisc Tech-
nology Inc.
(represented by: first, K.
Adamantopoulos, V. Akritidis and D. De Notaris, lawyers, and
subsequently by K. Adamantopoulos and J. Branton, Solicitor)

(Taipei Hsien, Taiwan)

Defendant: Council of
S. Marquardt, acting as Agent, and G. Berrisch, lawyer)

the European Union (represented by

Intervener in support of the defendant: Commission of the Euro-
pean Communities (represented by T. Scharf and S. Meany,
Agents)

Re:

Annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 1050/2002 of 13
June 2002 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and
collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports
of recordable compact discs originating in Taiwan (OJ 2002 L
160, p. 2).

(Case T-302/03) (1)

(Community trade mark — Application for the Community
word mark map&guide — Absolute grounds for refusal —
Descriptive character — Lack of distinctive character —
Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2006/C 310/19)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: PTV Planung Transport Verkehr AG (Karlsruhe,
Germany) (represented by: F. Nielsen, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market
(Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: B. Müller and G.
Schneider, Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of
Appeal of OHIM of 1 July 2003 (Case R 1046/2001-2),
concerning an application for registration of the word mark
map&guide as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 264, 1.11.2003.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders Ritek Corp. and Prodisc Technology Inc. to bear their own

costs and those incurred by the Council;

3. Orders the Commission to bear its own costs

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 17 October
2006 — Dehon v Parliament

(Joined Cases T-432/03 and T-95/05) (1)

(Officials — Vacant post — Compliance with a judgment of
the Court of First Instance annulling an appointment decision
— Article 29(1) of the Staff Regulations — Organisation of
an internal competition)

(2006/C 310/20)

Language of the case: French

(1) OJ C 289, 23.11.2002.

Parties

Applicant: Jean Dehon (Hagen, Luxembourg) (represented by: S.
Orlandi, X. Martin, A. Coolen,
J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal,
lawyers)

C 310/12

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

16.12.2006

Defendant: European Parliament
Hertzen, A. Bencomo Weber and A. Lukosiute, Agents)

(represented by: H. von

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 October
2006 — Carius v Commission

Re:

In Case T-432/03, application for annulment of the European
Parliament's decision to organise an internal competition to fill
the post of deputy head of the French translation division
advertised in vacancy notice No 9192 and, in Case T-95/05,
application for annulment of the Parliament's decision of 29
April 2004 appointing M.S. to that post.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the actions;

2. Orders each party to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 47, 21.2.2004.

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 10 October
2006 — Arranz Benitez v Parliament

(Case T-87/04) (1)

(Officials — Remuneration — Actual shared maintenance of
the children following the divorce of two officials — Taken
into consideration in order to calculate the tax allowance)

(2006/C 310/21)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Milagros Irène Arranz Benitez (Brussels, Belgium)
(represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen,
J.-N. Louis and E.
Marchal, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: M. Mustapha-
Pascha and L. Knudsen, Agents)

Re:

Annulment of the Parliament's decision of 15 April 2003 in so
far as that decision alters, as from 1 May 2003, the applicant's
right to the tax allowance in respect of dependent children.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders each party to bear its own costs.

(Case T-173/04) (1)

(Officials — Career Development Report — 2001/2002
appraisal procedure — Action for annulment — Plea of illeg-
ality — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons
— Manifest error of assessment)

(2006/C 310/22)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Jürgen Carius (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: N.
Lhoëst, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: H. Tserepa-Lacombe and M. Velardo, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of 21 May 2003
drawing up the definitive version of the applicant's Career
Development Report
for the period from 1 July 2001 to
31 December 2002 and, so far as necessary, of the decision of
23 December 2003 rejecting the applicant's complaint.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders each party to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 179, 10.7.2004.

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 10 October
2006 — Van der Spree v Commission

(Case T-182/04) (1)

(Officials — Career Development Report — 2001/2002
appraisal period — Articles 26 and 43 of the Staff Regula-
tions — Rights of the defence — Annulment )

(2006/C 310/23)

Language of the case: French

(1) OJ C 106, 30.4.2004.

Parties

Applicant: Daniel Van der Spree (Overijse, Belgium) (represented
by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)