Case T-173/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 October 2006 — Carius v Commission (Officials — Career Development Report — 2001/2002 appraisal procedure — Action for annulment — Plea of illegality — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment)
Date: 2006-12-16
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, European official, action for annulment (EU), professional career, report, staff assessment

C 310/12

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

16.12.2006

Defendant: European Parliament
Hertzen, A. Bencomo Weber and A. Lukosiute, Agents)

(represented by: H. von

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 October
2006 — Carius v Commission

Re:

In Case T-432/03, application for annulment of the European
Parliament's decision to organise an internal competition to fill
the post of deputy head of the French translation division
advertised in vacancy notice No 9192 and, in Case T-95/05,
application for annulment of the Parliament's decision of 29
April 2004 appointing M.S. to that post.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the actions;

2. Orders each party to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 47, 21.2.2004.

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 10 October
2006 — Arranz Benitez v Parliament

(Case T-87/04) (1)

(Officials — Remuneration — Actual shared maintenance of
the children following the divorce of two officials — Taken
into consideration in order to calculate the tax allowance)

(2006/C 310/21)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Milagros Irène Arranz Benitez (Brussels, Belgium)
(represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen,
J.-N. Louis and E.
Marchal, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: M. Mustapha-
Pascha and L. Knudsen, Agents)

Re:

Annulment of the Parliament's decision of 15 April 2003 in so
far as that decision alters, as from 1 May 2003, the applicant's
right to the tax allowance in respect of dependent children.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders each party to bear its own costs.

(Case T-173/04) (1)

(Officials — Career Development Report — 2001/2002
appraisal procedure — Action for annulment — Plea of illeg-
ality — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons
— Manifest error of assessment)

(2006/C 310/22)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Jürgen Carius (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: N.
Lhoëst, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: H. Tserepa-Lacombe and M. Velardo, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of 21 May 2003
drawing up the definitive version of the applicant's Career
Development Report
for the period from 1 July 2001 to
31 December 2002 and, so far as necessary, of the decision of
23 December 2003 rejecting the applicant's complaint.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders each party to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 179, 10.7.2004.

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 10 October
2006 — Van der Spree v Commission

(Case T-182/04) (1)

(Officials — Career Development Report — 2001/2002
appraisal period — Articles 26 and 43 of the Staff Regula-
tions — Rights of the defence — Annulment )

(2006/C 310/23)

Language of the case: French

(1) OJ C 106, 30.4.2004.

Parties

Applicant: Daniel Van der Spree (Overijse, Belgium) (represented
by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)