Case T-80/05: Order of the Court of First Instance of 19 September 2006 — Bavendam and Others v Commission (Action for annulment — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Decisions 2004/798/EC and 2004/813/EC — List of sites of Community importance for the Continental biogeographical region and the Atlantic biogeographical region — Persons directly and individually concerned — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2006-12-02
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, Germany, action for annulment (EU), environmental law, protected area

C 294/48

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

2.12.2006

Interveners in support of the defendant: Österreichische Elektrizi-
tätswirtschafts-AG (Vienna, Austria); EVN AG (Maria Enzers-
dorf, Austria); Wien Energie GmbH (Vienna); Energie AG Ober-
Elektrizitäts-
österreich
wirtschafts-AG (Eisenstadt, Austria); and Linz AG für Energie,
Telekommunikation, Verkehr und Kommunale Dienste (Linz)
(represented by: S. Polster and H. Wollmann, lawyers)

(Linz, Austria);

Burgenländische

Re:

for

annulment

Application
Commission Decision
2004/271/EC of 11 June 2003 declaring a concentration to be
compatible with the common market and the EEA Agreement
(Case COMP/M.2947 — Verbund/EnergieAllianz) (OJ 2004 L
92, p. 91)

of

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. The applicants are ordered to bear their own costs and jointly and
severally the costs incurred by the Commission and by the interve-
ners Österreichische Elektrizitätswirtschafts-AG, EVN AG, Wien
Energie GmbH, Energie AG Oberösterreich, Burgenländische Elek-
trizitätswirtschafts-AG and Linz AG für Energie, Telekommunika-
tion, Verkehr und Kommunale Dienste.

3. The intervener Ampere AG is ordered to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 7, 10.01.2004.

Order of the Court of First Instance of 19 September 2006
— Bavendam and Others v Commission

(Case T-80/05) (1)

(Action for annulment — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conserva-
tion of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Deci-
sions 2004/798/EC and 2004/813/EC — List of sites of
Community importance for the Continental biogeographical
region and the Atlantic biogeographical region — Persons
directly and individually concerned — Inadmissibility)

(2006/C 294/101)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Hinrich Bavendam (Bremen, Germany); Günther
Früchtnicht (Bremen); Hinrich Geerken (Bremen); Hans-Jürgen
Weyhausen-Brinkmann
von
(Bremen);
Einsiedel (Leipzig, Germany); Christina Gräfin von Schall-Riau-
cour
(Ahlen-Vorhelm, Germany); Franz-Albert Metternich-
Sandor, Prinz von Ratibor und Corvey (Höxter, Germany);
Christoph Prinz zu Schleswig-Holstein (Thumby, Germany);

Curt-Hildebrand

and Stadt Schloß Holte-Stukenbrock (Germany)
by: T. Giesen, lawyer)

(represented

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: M. van Beek and B. Schima, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Decision 2004/798/EC
of 7 December 2004 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive
92/43/EEC, the list of sites of Community importance for the
Continental biogeographical region (OJ 2004 L 382, p. 1), and
Commission Decision 2004/813/EC of 7 December 2004
adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, the list of
sites of Community importance for the Atlantic biogeogra-
phical region (OJ 2004 L 387, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

2. The applicants shall bear their own costs and pay those of the

Commission.

(1) OJ C 143, 11.6.2005.

Order of the Court of First Instance of 19 September 2006
— CFE v Commission

(Case T-100/05) (1)

(Action for annulment — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conserva-
tion of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Deci-
sion 2004/813/EC — List of sites of Community importance
for the Atlantic biogeographical region — Person directly
affected — Inadmissibility)

(2006/C 294/102)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Compagnie d'entreprises CFE SA (Brussels, Belgium)
(represented by: B. Louveaux and J. van Ypersele, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: M. van Beek and F. Simonetti, Agents)

Re:

for

annulment

Commission Decision
Application
to
2004/813/EC of 7 December 2004 adopting, pursuant
Council Directive 92/43/EEC, the list of sites of Community
importance for the Atlantic biogeographical region (OJ 2004 L
387, p. 1)

of