Case T-100/05: Order of the Court of First Instance of 19 September 2006 — CFE v Commission (Action for annulment — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Decision 2004/813/EC — List of sites of Community importance for the Atlantic biogeographical region — Person directly affected — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2006-12-02
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment (EU), decision-making, land and buildings, ownership, protected area

C 294/48

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

2.12.2006

Interveners in support of the defendant: Österreichische Elektrizi-
tätswirtschafts-AG (Vienna, Austria); EVN AG (Maria Enzers-
dorf, Austria); Wien Energie GmbH (Vienna); Energie AG Ober-
Elektrizitäts-
österreich
wirtschafts-AG (Eisenstadt, Austria); and Linz AG für Energie,
Telekommunikation, Verkehr und Kommunale Dienste (Linz)
(represented by: S. Polster and H. Wollmann, lawyers)

(Linz, Austria);

Burgenländische

Re:

for

annulment

Application
Commission Decision
2004/271/EC of 11 June 2003 declaring a concentration to be
compatible with the common market and the EEA Agreement
(Case COMP/M.2947 — Verbund/EnergieAllianz) (OJ 2004 L
92, p. 91)

of

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. The applicants are ordered to bear their own costs and jointly and
severally the costs incurred by the Commission and by the interve-
ners Österreichische Elektrizitätswirtschafts-AG, EVN AG, Wien
Energie GmbH, Energie AG Oberösterreich, Burgenländische Elek-
trizitätswirtschafts-AG and Linz AG für Energie, Telekommunika-
tion, Verkehr und Kommunale Dienste.

3. The intervener Ampere AG is ordered to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 7, 10.01.2004.

Order of the Court of First Instance of 19 September 2006
— Bavendam and Others v Commission

(Case T-80/05) (1)

(Action for annulment — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conserva-
tion of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Deci-
sions 2004/798/EC and 2004/813/EC — List of sites of
Community importance for the Continental biogeographical
region and the Atlantic biogeographical region — Persons
directly and individually concerned — Inadmissibility)

(2006/C 294/101)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Hinrich Bavendam (Bremen, Germany); Günther
Früchtnicht (Bremen); Hinrich Geerken (Bremen); Hans-Jürgen
Weyhausen-Brinkmann
von
(Bremen);
Einsiedel (Leipzig, Germany); Christina Gräfin von Schall-Riau-
cour
(Ahlen-Vorhelm, Germany); Franz-Albert Metternich-
Sandor, Prinz von Ratibor und Corvey (Höxter, Germany);
Christoph Prinz zu Schleswig-Holstein (Thumby, Germany);

Curt-Hildebrand

and Stadt Schloß Holte-Stukenbrock (Germany)
by: T. Giesen, lawyer)

(represented

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: M. van Beek and B. Schima, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Decision 2004/798/EC
of 7 December 2004 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive
92/43/EEC, the list of sites of Community importance for the
Continental biogeographical region (OJ 2004 L 382, p. 1), and
Commission Decision 2004/813/EC of 7 December 2004
adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, the list of
sites of Community importance for the Atlantic biogeogra-
phical region (OJ 2004 L 387, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

2. The applicants shall bear their own costs and pay those of the

Commission.

(1) OJ C 143, 11.6.2005.

Order of the Court of First Instance of 19 September 2006
— CFE v Commission

(Case T-100/05) (1)

(Action for annulment — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conserva-
tion of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Deci-
sion 2004/813/EC — List of sites of Community importance
for the Atlantic biogeographical region — Person directly
affected — Inadmissibility)

(2006/C 294/102)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Compagnie d'entreprises CFE SA (Brussels, Belgium)
(represented by: B. Louveaux and J. van Ypersele, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: M. van Beek and F. Simonetti, Agents)

Re:

for

annulment

Commission Decision
Application
to
2004/813/EC of 7 December 2004 adopting, pursuant
Council Directive 92/43/EEC, the list of sites of Community
importance for the Atlantic biogeographical region (OJ 2004 L
387, p. 1)

of

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/49

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

Order of the Court of First Instance of 19 September 2006
— Benkö and Others v Commission

2. In addition to bearing its own costs, the applicant is ordered to

pay the costs incurred by the Commission.

(Case T-122/05) (1)

(1) OJ C 106, 30.04.2005.

Order of the Court of First Instance of 19 September 2006
— Rodenbröker and Others v Commission

(Case T-117/05) (1)

(Action for annulment — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conserva-
tion of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Deci-
sion 2004/813/EC — List of sites of Community importance
for the Atlantic biogeographical region — Persons directly
and individually concerned — Inadmissibility)

(2006/C 294/103)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Andreas Rodenbröker (Hövelhof, Germany) and the
other 81 applicants whose names appear in the Annex to the
order (represented by: H. Glatzel, lawyer)

(Action for annulment — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conserva-
tion of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Deci-
sion 2004/798/EC — List of sites of Community importance
region — Persons
for

the Continental biogeographical
directly and individually concerned — Inadmissibility)

(2006/C 294/104)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Robert Benkö (Kohfidisch, Austria); Nikolaus Dras-
kovich (Güssing, Austria); Alexander Freiherr von Kottwitz-
Erdödy (Kohfidisch); Peter Masser (Deutschlandsberg, Austria);
Alfred Prinz von und zu Liechtenstein (Deutschlandsberg);
Marktgemeinde Götzendorf an der Leitha (Austria); Gemeinde
Ebergassing (Austria); Ernst Harrach (Bruck an der Leitha,
Austria); Schlossgut Schönbühel-Aggstein AG (Vaduz, Liechten-
stein), and Heinrich Rüdiger Fürst Starhemberg'sche Familien-
stiftung (Vaduz) (represented by: M. Schaffgotsch, lawyer)

Defendants: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: M. van Beek and B. Schima, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: M. van Beek and B. Schima, acting as Agents)

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Decision 2004/813/EC
of 7 December 2004 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive
92/43/EEC, the list of sites of Community importance for the
Atlantic biogeographical region (OJ 2004 L 387, p. 1).

Action for annulment of Commission Decision 2004/798/EC
of 7 December 2004 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive
92/43/EEC, the list of sites of Community importance for the
Continental biogeographical region (OJ 2004 L 382, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

2. The applicants shall bear their own costs and pay those of the
relating to the application for

including those

Commission,
interim measures.

2. The applicants shall bear their own costs and pay those of the

Commission.

(1) OJ C 143, 11.6.2005.

(1) OJ C 171, 9.7.2005.