Case T-117/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 27 September 2006 — Werkgroep Commerciële Jachthavens Zuidelijke Randmeren and Others v Commission of the European Communities (State aid — Aid awarded by the Netherlands authorities to non-profit-making marinas — Action for annulment — Admissibility)
Date: 2006-12-02
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, Netherlands, action for annulment (EU), aid to undertakings, control of State aid, harbour installation, non-profit organisation

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/43

4. Orders the Commission to pay one tenth of the costs incurred by

Archer Daniels Midland Co.;

5. Orders Archer Daniels Midland Co. to pay the remainder of its

own costs and the costs incurred by the Commission.

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 27 September
2006 — Werkgroep Commerciële Jachthavens Zuidelijke
Randmeren and Others v Commission of the European
Communities

(1) OJ C 144, 15.6.2002.

(Case T-117/04) (1)

(State aid — Aid awarded by the Netherlands authorities to
non-profit-making marinas — Action for annulment —
Admissibility)

(2006/C 294/91)

Language of the case: Dutch

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 27 September
2006 — Haladjian Frères v Commission

(Case T-204/03) (1)

Parties

(Competition — Article 81 EC — Article 82 EC — Distribu-
tion of spare parts — Parallel imports — Complaint — Deci-
sion rejecting complaint)

(2006/C 294/90)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Vereniging Werkgroep Commerciële Jachthavens
Zuidelijke Randmeren (Zeewolde, Netherlands); Jachthaven Zijl
Zeewolde BV (Zeewolde); Maatschappij
tot exploitatie van
onroerende goederen Wolderwijd II BV (Zeewolde); Jachthaven
Strand-Horst BV (Ermelo, Netherlands); Recreatiegebied Erke-
Jachthaven- en Campingbedrijf
mederstrand vof
Netherlands);
Nieuwboer
BV
Jachthaven Naarden BV (Naarden, Netherlands),
(represented
by: T. Ottervanger, A. Bijleveld and A. van den Oord, lawyers)

(Bunschoten-Spakenburg,

(Zeewolde);

Applicant: Haladjian Frères (Sorgues, France) (represented by: N.
Coutrelis, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: H. van Vliet, A. Bouquet and A. Nijenhuis, Agents)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: A. Whelan and O. Beynet, Agents, assisted by D.
Waelbroeck, lawyer)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of the Nether-
lands, represented by H. Sevenster and M. de Grave, Agents,

Interveners in support of the defendant: Caterpillar, Inc. (Peoria, Illi-
nois, United States) and Caterpillar Group Services SA (Char-
leroi, Belgium) (represented by: initially N. Levy, Solicitor, and
S. Kingston, Barrister, then N. Levy and T. Graf, lawyer)

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission's decision of 1
April 2003 rejecting the complaint alleging infringements of
Articles 81 EC and 82 EC lodged by Haladjian Frères SA
against Caterpillar, Inc.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the application;

2. Orders the applicant to bear its own costs and to pay the costs

incurred by the Commission and the interveners.

for

annulment

Application
Commission Decision
2004/114/EC of 29 October 2003 concerning aid measures
in favour of non-profit
implemented by the Netherlands
harbours for recreational crafts (OJ 2004 L 34, p. 63).

of

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action as inadmissible.

2. Orders the applicants to bear their own costs as well as those
incurred by the Commission. The Kingdom of the Netherlands
shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 200, 23.8.2003.

(1) OJ C 118, 30.4.2004.