Case C-390/06: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Roma (Italy) lodged on 19 September 2006 — Nuova Agricast srl v Ministero delle Attività Produttive
Date: 2006-12-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: State aid, control of State aid, equal treatment, interpretation of the law, investment aid, less-favoured region

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the The Commis-
sione Tributaria Provinciale (Regional Tax Court) Milan,
Italy lodged on 18 September 2006 — Bakemark Italia Srl
v Agenzia Entrate Ufficio Milano 1 (Local Tax Office)
Milan

(Case C-386/06)

(2006/C 294/45)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

The Commissione Tributaria Provinciale (Regional Tax Court),
Milan

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Bakemark Italia Srl

Defendant: Agenzia Entrate Ufficio (Local Tax Office) Milan

Question referred

Is Article 19(a)(1)(c), (d) and (e) of DPR No 633/72 incompa-
the Sixth Council Directive No
tible with Article 17 of
77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977? (1)

(1) OJ L145, p. 1

Action brought on 19 September 2006 — Commission of
the European Communities v Republic of Finland

(Case C-387/06)

(2006/C 294/46)

Language of the case: Finnish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by M. Huttunen and M. Shotter, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Finland

Form of order sought

— declare that, by restricting in Paragraph 43 of the Viestintä-
markkinalaki (Communications Market Law) the powers of
the national regulatory authority to regulate the termination
of calls from a fixed network to a mobile network, the
Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under
Article 8(1), (2)(b) and 3(c) of Directive 2002/21/EC of the
European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002
on a common regulatory framework for electronic commu-
nications networks and services (1) and under Article 8(1)
and (4) of Directive 2002/19/EC of the European Parlia-
ment and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on access to,

C 294/27

communications

interconnection

and
networks and associated facilities (2);

of,

electronic

— order the Republic of Finland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for implementation of
expired on 24 July 2003.

the directive

(1) OJ 2002 L 108, p. 33.
(2) OJ 2002 L 108, p. 7.

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale
ordinario di Roma (Italy) lodged on 19 September 2006 —
Nuova Agricast srl v Ministero delle Attività Produttive

(Case C-390/06)

(2006/C 294/47)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale ordinario di Roma

Parties to the main proceedings

Claimant: Nuova Agricast srl

Defendant: Ministero delle Attività Produttive

Question referred

‘The question concerns the validity of the EU Commission's
decision of 12 July 2000, notified to the Italian Government by
letter referenced SG(2000)D/105754 of 2 August 2000, solely
with reference to the transitional provision which provides for
exceptional derogation from the principle of “necessary aid” —
on the occasion of the first implementation of the scheme in
question — only for applications “made on the occasion of the
last invitation to apply for support measures, organised on the
basis of the preceding scheme and approved by the Commis-
sion until 31 December 1999, which were considered eligible
financial
for aid but were not cleared because insufficient
resources were allocated to that invitation”, with the conse-
quent unjustified passing-over — in breach of the principle of
equal treatment and of the obligation to state the reasons on
which the decision was based pursuant to Article 253 EC — of
applications made in connection with earlier invitations, which
had not been supported because of a lack of funds and which
were waiting to be included automatically in the next invitation
or to be revised and resubmitted in the first “appropriate” invi-
tation established under the new scheme’.