Case T-350/03: Order of the Court of First Instance of 18 September 2006 — Wirtschaftskammer Kärnten and best connect Ampere Strompool v Commission (Action for annulment — Competition — Decision declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market — Legal persons — Acts of individual concern to them — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2006-12-02
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment (EU), economic concentration, electrical energy, free competition, market access

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/47

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 27 September
2006 — Dimitra Lantzoni v Court of Justice

Re:

(Case T-156/05) (1)

(Officials — Promotion — Award of promotion points —
Link to staff report — Refusal of promotion)

(2006/C 294/98)

Language of the case: French

Parties

First, annulment of the decision definitively establishing his
staff report for the year 2003, of the decision awarding the
applicant's merit points for the year 2003 and of the decision
not to promote him in 2004, and also of the decision rejecting
his complaint against those decisions and, second, a claim for
damages.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

Applicant: Dimitra Lantzoni
bourg) (represented by: M. Bouché, lawyer)

(residing at Übersyren, Luxem-

1. Annuls the Court of Auditors' decisions awarding the applicant
his merit points for the year 2003 and not to promote him in
2004.

Defendant: Court of Justice (represented by: M. Schauss, Agent)

2. Rejects the remainder of the action.

Re:

Annulment of the decision of 8 March 2005 of the defendant's
Complaints Committee relating, first, to the promotion points
awarded to the applicant for 2002 and, second, to the fact that
she was not promoted in 2003.

3. Orders the Court of Auditors to bear its own costs and half those

incurred by the applicant.

4. Orders the applicant to bear all the costs relating to the proceed-

ings for interim relief.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action.

2. Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 155 of 25.6.2005

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 3 October 2006
— Nijs v Court of Auditors

(Case T-171/05) (1)

(Officials — Promotion — Promotion year 2003 — Staff
report — Award of merit points — Decision not to promote
the applicant to the post of translator-reviser)

(2006/C 294/99)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Bart Nijs (Bereldange, Luxembourg) (represented by:
F. Rollinger, lawyer)

Defendant: Court of Auditors (represented by: T. Kennedy, J.-M.
Stenier and G. Corstens, Agents)

(1) OJ C 182 of 23.7.2005.

Order of the Court of First Instance of 18 September 2006
— Wirtschaftskammer Kärnten and best connect Ampere
Strompool v Commission

(Case T-350/03) (1)

(Action for annulment — Competition — Decision declaring
a concentration to be compatible with the common market —
Legal persons — Acts of individual concern to them — Inad-
missibility)

(2006/C 294/100)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Wirtschaftskammer Kärnten and best
Ampere Strompool GmbH (Klagenfurt, Austria)
by: M. Angerer, lawyer)

connect
(represented

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: initially, A. Bouquet, S. Rating and K. Mojzesowicz,
and subsequently, A. Bouquet and K. Mojzesowicz)

Intervener
Germany)
Schweer, lawyers)

the applicants: Ampere AG (Berlin,
in support of
(represented by: C. von Hammerstein and C.-S.

C 294/48

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

2.12.2006

Interveners in support of the defendant: Österreichische Elektrizi-
tätswirtschafts-AG (Vienna, Austria); EVN AG (Maria Enzers-
dorf, Austria); Wien Energie GmbH (Vienna); Energie AG Ober-
Elektrizitäts-
österreich
wirtschafts-AG (Eisenstadt, Austria); and Linz AG für Energie,
Telekommunikation, Verkehr und Kommunale Dienste (Linz)
(represented by: S. Polster and H. Wollmann, lawyers)

(Linz, Austria);

Burgenländische

Re:

for

annulment

Application
Commission Decision
2004/271/EC of 11 June 2003 declaring a concentration to be
compatible with the common market and the EEA Agreement
(Case COMP/M.2947 — Verbund/EnergieAllianz) (OJ 2004 L
92, p. 91)

of

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. The applicants are ordered to bear their own costs and jointly and
severally the costs incurred by the Commission and by the interve-
ners Österreichische Elektrizitätswirtschafts-AG, EVN AG, Wien
Energie GmbH, Energie AG Oberösterreich, Burgenländische Elek-
trizitätswirtschafts-AG and Linz AG für Energie, Telekommunika-
tion, Verkehr und Kommunale Dienste.

3. The intervener Ampere AG is ordered to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 7, 10.01.2004.

Order of the Court of First Instance of 19 September 2006
— Bavendam and Others v Commission

(Case T-80/05) (1)

(Action for annulment — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conserva-
tion of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Deci-
sions 2004/798/EC and 2004/813/EC — List of sites of
Community importance for the Continental biogeographical
region and the Atlantic biogeographical region — Persons
directly and individually concerned — Inadmissibility)

(2006/C 294/101)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Hinrich Bavendam (Bremen, Germany); Günther
Früchtnicht (Bremen); Hinrich Geerken (Bremen); Hans-Jürgen
Weyhausen-Brinkmann
von
(Bremen);
Einsiedel (Leipzig, Germany); Christina Gräfin von Schall-Riau-
cour
(Ahlen-Vorhelm, Germany); Franz-Albert Metternich-
Sandor, Prinz von Ratibor und Corvey (Höxter, Germany);
Christoph Prinz zu Schleswig-Holstein (Thumby, Germany);

Curt-Hildebrand

and Stadt Schloß Holte-Stukenbrock (Germany)
by: T. Giesen, lawyer)

(represented

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: M. van Beek and B. Schima, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Decision 2004/798/EC
of 7 December 2004 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive
92/43/EEC, the list of sites of Community importance for the
Continental biogeographical region (OJ 2004 L 382, p. 1), and
Commission Decision 2004/813/EC of 7 December 2004
adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, the list of
sites of Community importance for the Atlantic biogeogra-
phical region (OJ 2004 L 387, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

2. The applicants shall bear their own costs and pay those of the

Commission.

(1) OJ C 143, 11.6.2005.

Order of the Court of First Instance of 19 September 2006
— CFE v Commission

(Case T-100/05) (1)

(Action for annulment — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conserva-
tion of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Deci-
sion 2004/813/EC — List of sites of Community importance
for the Atlantic biogeographical region — Person directly
affected — Inadmissibility)

(2006/C 294/102)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Compagnie d'entreprises CFE SA (Brussels, Belgium)
(represented by: B. Louveaux and J. van Ypersele, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: M. van Beek and F. Simonetti, Agents)

Re:

for

annulment

Commission Decision
Application
to
2004/813/EC of 7 December 2004 adopting, pursuant
Council Directive 92/43/EEC, the list of sites of Community
importance for the Atlantic biogeographical region (OJ 2004 L
387, p. 1)

of