Case T-250/06 P: Appeal brought on 11 September 2006 by Ott and Others against the order of 30 June 2006 by the Civil Service Tribubal in Case F-87/05 Ott and Others v Commission
Date: 2006-11-18
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, European official, action by staff, appeal, promotion, staff assessment

C 281/38

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

18.11.2006

Appeal brought on 11 September 2006 by Ott and Others
against the order of 30 June 2006 by the Civil Service
Tribubal in Case F-87/05 Ott and Others v Commission

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European
Communities

(Case T-250/06 P)

(2006/C 281/66)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellants: Martial Ott
(Oberanven, Luxembourg), Fernando
Lopez Tola (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) et Francis Weiler (Itzig,
Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Frabetti, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European
Communities

Forms of order sought

— Annul the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 30 June

2006 in Case F-87/05;

— Rule on the expenses, costs and fees and order the Commis-

sion to pay them.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In their appeal, the appellants claim that the Court of First
Instance committed breaches of procedure in rejecting the
application as manifestly inadmissible as regards Mr Weiler. In
addition, the applicants contend that the Civil Service Tribunal
committed breaches of procedure when considering the
substance of the pleas based on infringement of Article 45 of
the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities,
infringement of the GIP of Article 45, infringement of the prin-
ciple of non-discrimination and a manifest error of assessment.

Form of order sought by the appellant

— declare the present appeal admissible;

— annul the judgment delivered by the Civil Service Tribunal

on 28 June 2006 in Case F-39/05;

— grant the pleas for annulment and compensation submitted

by the appellant at first instance;

— order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In her appeal, the appellant alleges, firstly, that the Tribunal
infringed Community law by an incorrect legal classification of
certain facts and, secondly, that it committed a procedural
error infringing her rights of the defence.

Appeal brought on 8 September 2006 by Chassagne
against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered
on 29 June 2006 in Case F-11/05, Chassagne v Commission

(Case T-253/06 P)

(2006/C 281/68)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Olivier Chassagne (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by
S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Appeal brought on 7 September 2006 by Beau against the
judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 28
June 2006 in Case F-39/05, Beau v Commission

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European
Communities

(Case T-252/06 P)

(2006/C 281/67)

Form of order sought by the appellant

Language of the case: French

The Court is asked to:

Parties

— annul the order made by the Civil Service Tribunal on 29

June 2006 in Case F-11/05;

— allow the

claims

for

annulment

and compensation

submitted by the applicant at first instance

Appellant: Marie-Yolande Beau (Paris, France) (represented by S.
Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

— order the defendant to pay the costs in their entirety.