Commission staff working document - Accompanying document to the Proposal for a Council (EC, EURATOM) Regulation adjusting with effect from 1 July 2006 the remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants of the European Communities and the correction coefficients applied thereto [COM(2006) 668 final]
Date: 2006-11-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: European official, pay, pension scheme, purchasing power, servant (EU), statistics













EUR-Lex - 52006SC1422 - EN






Important legal notice




|



52006SC1422

Commission staff working document - Accompanying document to the Proposal for a Council (EC, EURATOM) Regulation adjusting with effect from 1 July 2006 the remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants of the European Communities and the correction coefficients applied thereto [COM(2006) 668 final]  /* SEC/2006/1422 */  








[pic] | COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES |Brussels, 8.11.2006SEC(2006) 1422COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENTAccompanying document to theProposal for a COUNCIL (EC, EURATOM) REGULATION adjusting with effect from 1 July 2006 the remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants of the European Communities and the correction coefficients applied thereto [COM(2006) 668 final]COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Eurostat Report on annual adjustment of remuneration and pension including Bulgaria and RomaniaReference Period: June 2005 – June 2006 Eurostat, Unit D5 Luxembourg, October 2006TABLE OF CONTENTSExecutive Summary 4Introduction 51. Evolution of the purchasing power of national officials 61.1. Specific Indicator 61.2. Control Indicator 62. Changes in the cost of living for Brussels (Brussels International Index) 73. Adjustment of remuneration and pension in Belgium and Luxembourg 84. Adjustment of remuneration and pension outside Belgium and Luxembourg 94.1. Correction coefficients for staff outside Belgium and Luxembourg 94.2. Correction coefficients for pensioners outside Belgium and Luxembourg 12Executive SummaryThe report presents all information required for annual adjustment of remuneration and pension in Belgium/Luxembourg and in other places.For the period July 2005 – July 2006 the global specific indicator (average change in real net remuneration) is 0.2% and the Brussels International Index (cost of living for the EC officials) is 102.1.As a consequence the adjustment of the nominal net remuneration and pension of EC officials in Belgium and Luxembourg, necessary to maintain a parallel development of purchasing power with the civil servants in the Member States is equal to 2.3%.The correction coefficients, which apply to remunerations and pensions outside Belgium and Luxembourg, are given in tables 5 and 7 respectively.IntroductionIn accordance with the Articles 64, 65 and Annex XI of the Staff Regulations applicable to officials and other servants of the European Communities, Eurostat hereby presents its report for the twelve months to July 2006.Article 64, 65 and Annex XI of the Staff Regulations, which are in force since 1 May 2004 define the method for the annual adjustment of remuneration and pension of Community officials. The annual adjustments shall accordingly be determined by the following factors:-  changes in the purchasing power of salaries of national civil servants in central government (specific indicator);-  changes in the cost of living in Brussels (Brussels International Index);-  economic parities between Brussels and the other places of employment in the Member States (correction coefficients).The value of the adjustment is equal to the product of the specific indicator and the change in the cost of living index in Brussels. Changes in the cost of living in places of employment other than Brussels and Luxembourg are derived indirectly from the value of the adjustment for Brussels and changes in the economic parities between Brussels and those other places.Chapters 1 to 4 of this report examine respectively:-  Evolution of the purchasing power of national officials in the central governments,-  Changes in the cost of living in Brussels,-  Adjustment of remuneration and pension in Belgium and Luxembourg, and-  Adjustment of remuneration and pension outside Belgium and Luxembourg.All figures and calculations contained in this report are based on data supplied by the responsible authorities in the Member States. More information on methodology, detailed results and statistical analysis is available in the annexes to this report. For any information concerning this report, please contact Eurostat in Luxembourg:Eurostat, Unit D5BECH – A2/018,Bâtiment Jean MonnetL-2920 LuxembourgTel.: (352) 4301-35287Email: estat-a64ia65@ec.europa.euEVOLUTION OF THE PURCHASING POWER OF NATIONAL OFFICIALSSpecific IndicatorArticle 1.4 of the Annex XI says that to establish a global specific indicator for the European Union, Eurostat shall use a sample composed of the following Member States: Belgium, Germany, Spain, France, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom.Table 1 shows the changes in the net remuneration, both in nominal and real terms, in each of the above mentioned eight Member States. Changes in the harmonized consumer price indices (inflation rates) during the period June 2005 to June 2006 have been used to transform nominal changes in the remunerations to the real ones. In order to get the global specific indicators the results per country have been weighted in proportion to their national GDP for the year 2005 measured by purchasing power parities. The global specific indicator (average change in real net remuneration) for the year 2006 is 0.2%.[pic]Control IndicatorFollowing Article 1.4 (c) of Annex XI of the Staff Regulations, Eurostat reports here on data concerning the real per capita emoluments in central government. These data serve as control indicators. As the control indicator is expressed in gross terms, it is compared with the gross specific indicator.Table 2 compares the changes in real gross per capita remuneration in July 2006 with those of per capita real wage bills for 2006, where the respective values for 2005 are taken as 100. The table also shows the differences (in percent) between these two indicators.[pic]Eurostat identifies for some Member States (e.g. Netherlands) relatively big differences. They result from conceptual and statistical differences between the gross specific indicator and the control indicator.CHANGES IN THE COST OF LIVING IN BRUSSELS (BRUSSELS INTERNATIONAL INDEX)Article 64 and Annex XI of the Staff Regulations state that Eurostat shall draw up an index, based on the data provided by the Belgian authorities, to measure the changes in the cost of living for officials of the Communities in Brussels. This index, known as Brussels International Index, shall take into account the changes between June of the previous year and June of the current year and shall be based on the methodology defined by the Working Group on Article 64 of the Staff Regulations.The details of the calculation of this index corresponding to the 2006 annual salary adjustment are set out in table 3. The table shows that the cost of living for the EC officials in Brussels during the period June 2005 – June 2006 has increased, on average by 2.1%.[pic]ADJUSTMENT OF REMUNERATION AND PENSION IN BELGIUM AND LUXEMBOURGTaking into account the figures reported in chapter 1 and 2 the adjustment of the nominal net remuneration of EC officials in Belgium and Luxembourg, necessary to maintain a parallel development of purchasing power with the civil servants in the Member States, is equal to:[pic]ADJUSTMENT OF REMUNERATION AND PENSION OUTSIDE BELGIUM AND LUXEMBOURGCorrection coefficients for staff outside Belgium and LuxembourgThe object of the economic parities is to compare the relative costs of living of European institution officials in Brussels (reference city) with each of the capitals and other places of employment for which a correction coefficient has been set. The method used is to compare the price of a "basket" of goods and services purchased by the average official in Brussels with the prices of the same goods and services in each of the other places of employment. The average of all the price ratios is the "economic parity".The changes in the cost of living in the places of employment outside Belgium and Luxembourg are measured by the implicit price indices which are calculated as the product of the Brussels International Index and the changes in the economic parities between Brussels and those other places. Table 4 shows these changes.[pic]The correction coefficients applicable to the salaries of the European institution officials working in the capitals and places of employment other than Brussels and Luxembourg are determined on the basis of the relationships between the economic parities and the exchange rates for the month of July.The correction coefficient operates as a percentage adjustment to salaries to take account of the cost of living differences between Brussels and the various duty stations. Table 5 shows the calculation of the correction coefficients for July 2006 for places of employment situated in the European Union territory for which correction coefficients have been set.The value of the adjustment outside Belgium and Luxembourg derives from the value of the adjustment for Belgium/Luxembourg and from the changes in the economic parities between Brussels and those other places.[pic]Correction coefficients for pensioners outside Belgium and LuxembourgThe Staff Regulations, which are in force since 1 May 2004 stipulate the creation of correction coefficients for pensioners separate from those used for staff remuneration. The difference is that instead of being based on capital city price comparisons they relate to national comparisons, with Belgium as the base country.This section presents the calculated values of the economic parities and the correction coefficients for pensioners, with a reference date of July 1, 2006. The changes in the cost of living in Member States other than Belgium and Luxembourg are measured by the implicit indices which are calculated as the product of the Brussels International Index and the changes in the economic parities between Belgium and the Member States. Table 6 shows these changes.[pic]Table 7 shows the correction coefficients for all member States (relative to Belgium) calculated for the pensioners. However, due to specific rules governing the transition phase, these values will not immediately be applied to pensions. The coefficients applied will be a weighted average of those calculated for staff and for pensioners.[pic]Annex 1 to the Eurostat Report on Annual Adjustment ofRemuneration and Pension including Bulgaria and Romania Explanations and statistical analysesReference period:Year to 1 July 2006Commission Staff Working PaperTABLE OF CONTENTSINTRODUCTION 181. EVOLUTION OF PURCHASING POWER OF NATIONAL OFFICIALS 19-  1.1. General remarks on the calculation of the specific indicator 19-  1.1.1. Elements of remuneration 19-  1.1.2. Net remuneration 19-  1.1.3. Reference period 20-  1.1.4. Reference population 20-  1.1.5. Sample of family types 20-  1.1.6. Function groups 20-  1.1.7. Sample of grades 21-  1.1.8. Sample of countries 21-  1.1.9. Calculation of country specific indicator 21-  1.2. Specific indicator - results by functional groups 22-  1.3. Remuneration and taxes 22-  1.4. Cumulative specific indicators 23-  1.5. Control Indicators 242. CHANGES IN THE COST OF LIVING IN BRUSSELS 253. EQUIVALENCE OF PURCHASING POWER OF EC OFFICIALS IN THE MEMBER STATES 27-  3.1. Economic parities and correction coefficients 27-  3.2. Rents and rent parities 28-  3.3. Purchasing power parities - analysis of results 36-  3.3.1. Major changes in the economic parities from 2005 to 2006 36-  3.3.2. Differences in the correction coefficients calculated with and without the rent element 394. EQUIVALENCE OF PURCHASING POWER OF EC PENSIONERS IN THE MEMBER STATES 41-  4.1. Economic parities and correction coefficients for pensioners 41-  4.2. Purchasing power parities for pensioners – analysis of results 45-  4.3. Comparison of correction coefficients for staff and pensioners 485. INFORMATION ABOUT WORKING TIME 50IntroductionThis document is an annex to the Eurostat report on annual adjustment of remuneration and pension. While the main results concerning specific indicator and correction coefficients for staff and pensioners are presented in the report, the purpose of this annex is to give some explanations and statistical analyses of the results as well as detailed tables with statistical information.Articles 64 and 65 and Annex XI of the Staff Regulations, which are in force since 1 May 2004, define the method for the annual adjustment of the remuneration and pension of Community officials.The value of the adjustment is equal to the product of the specific indicator and the change in the cost of living index in Brussels. Changes in the cost of living in places of employment other than Brussels and Luxembourg are derived indirectly from the value of the adjustment for Brussels and changes in the economic parities between Brussels and those other places.Chapters 1, 2, 3 and 4 of this report examine respectively:-  the changes in the purchasing power of salaries of central government civil servants in the eight Member States belonging to the sample: Belgium, Germany, Spain, France, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands and United Kingdom (specific indicator);-  the changes in the cost of living for Brussels;-  the economic parities and the correction coefficients for staff;-  the economic parities and the correction coefficients for pensioners.In Chapter 5 some information about working time in Central Governments of the eights sampled Member States is given.All figures and calculations contained in this report are based on data supplied by the responsible authorities in the Member States. For any information concerning this annex, please contact Eurostat in Luxembourg:Eurostat, Unit D5BECH – A2/018Bâtiment Jean MonnetL-2920 Luxembourgtel.: (+352) 4301-35287Email: estat-a64ia65@ec.europa.euEVOLUTION OF PURCHASING POWER OF NATIONAL OFFICIALS1.  General remarks on the calculation of the specific indicatorThe specific indicator is a measure to represent the average change in the purchasing power of central government civil servants in Member States of the European Communities. It is measured by the real net salary increase in the central government civil service.One of the basic elements of the annual salary adjustment procedure is the principle of parallel development of the salaries, in terms of purchasing power of national central government civil servants and of officials of the European Communities. The specific indicator is the methodological tool allowing the implementation of this principle of parallelism.Article 65 and Annex XI determine the basic principles of the method, but these have to be filled with practical procedures. Therefore, we provide here a set of commonly agreed basic definitions. If a specific situation in a given country makes it meaningful to deviate from these definitions to ensure a better application of the spirit of the method, then Eurostat, in agreement with that country may do so.2.  Elements of remunerationAll elements of remuneration that affect the purchasing power of civil servants should be taken into account in calculating the gross remuneration. All general bonuses and premiums, which are part of the salary, should be reported. In general the following elements should be taken into account:-  basic salaries,-  all allowances and bonuses (e.g. general premiums, child benefit, family allowances),-  non-pensionable lump-sum payments (e.g. annual holiday pay, Christmas bonus).Not to be included:-  regional allowances granted to compensate for 'cost-of-living' differences,-  increase due to promotion or seniority,-  person-specific special allowances, for example, for exceptional performance.-  Net remunerationIn order to get net remuneration the following elements should be deducted from the gross remuneration:-  the amount of compulsory social deductions (social security and occupational pension scheme contributions),-  general taxes on income and-  other compulsory deductions (mutual assistance contribution, temporary contribution, etc.).-  Reference periodIn order to calculate the specific indicators for the year (t) the remuneration of central government civil servants on a fixed date of the year (t-1) is to be compared with the remuneration on the same date of the year (t).The method is based on the comparison of a snapshot of a national remuneration system in the month of July of the current year with the equivalent snapshot in the month of July of the previous year. A snapshot of the system, however, does not simply mean the remuneration grid in a particular month; rather, the remuneration level of the reference population employees in that month, including 1/12 of all annually paid elements such as Christmas bonuses, annual holiday pay, lump-sum payments etc.If Member States report remuneration data of a given month/year again (e.g. data concerning remuneration of July 2005 sent in 2005 and again in 2006), the data should be exactly the same. If not, they have to provide Eurostat with a clear justification (e.g. change in the structure of grades and categories in the public administration).3.  Reference populationThe reference population relates to permanent statutory staff of the sub-sector “central governments” (S.1311 of ESA95) of Member States. It should be noted that the sub-sector S.1311 in ESA 95 is defined as follows:“The sub-sector central government includes all administrative departments of the State and other central agencies whose competence extends normally over the whole economic territory, except of the administration of social security funds.”The reference population should however exclude the following groups:4.  the armed forces, security forces, police forces, frontier guards, etc.;5.  teachers, staff of national health services;6.  ministers of religion, if directly paid by central government;7.  diplomats and magistrates.8.  Sample of family typesThe specific indicator for each country is calculated on the basis of remuneration data of officials of two different family statuses - single and married with two dependent children , and each with a weight of 50%.9.  Function groupsAccording to Annex XI Eurostat is obliged to provide a specific indicator for each of the two function group: Administrator (AD) and Assistants (AST). Therefore, the posts in the national reference population should be classified, according to the nature of the duties to which they relate, in these two function groups – each should comprise several grades.-  Function group AD relates to staff engaged in administrative, advisory, linguistic and scientific duties that require university education or equivalent professional experience.-  Function group AST relates to staff engaged in executive, technical and clerical duties that require an advanced level of secondary education or equivalent professional experience.-  Sample of gradesOut of the reference population the Member States may select a sample of the more important grades in terms of staff numbers for each of the above mentioned function groups. Grades having only a small proportion of the total number of staff may not be taken into the sample.The sample should be representative of the reference population. The ratio between the number of staff in the grades covered by the sample and the number in the reference population should normally be more than 75%.10.  Sample of countriesArticle 1.4 of the Annex XI says that to establish a global specific indicator for the European Union, Eurostat shall use a sample composed of the following Member States: Belgium, Germany, Spain, France, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands and United Kingdom.11.  Calculation of country specific indicatorOn receipt of the data from the Member States Eurostat calculates specific indicators for each of the countries separately. The steps leading to these calculations are:-  Average gross and net remunerations for each grade are then aggregated to two function groups (AD and AST). They are calculated by taking weighted averages of the grades belonging to these groups. The sample size (number of civil servants in the sample of each grade) is taken as weight.-  The average gross and net remunerations for the two function groups are then aggregated to overall gross and net remunerations in the central government civil service by taking weighted average of the remunerations of these two groups, where the total number of civil servants in each of the groups is taken as weights.-  For each of the function groups as well as for the overall remunerations the following changes for the period July – July are calculated:-  Gross nominal-  Net nominal-  Gross real-  Net real-  The increases in real terms are calculated by taking into account the increase in the harmonized index of consumer price (HICP) for this period.-  The overall real net increase in remuneration is called the country specific indicator .-  Specific indicator - results by functional groupsTable 1.1 sets out the gross and net specific indicators both in nominal and real terms for each of the two function-groups.[pic]12.  Remuneration and taxesTable 1.2 provides comparative information on gross and net remuneration as well as on the HICP inflation rate over 12 months.[pic]13.  Cumulative specific indicatorsTable 1.3 illustrates the changes in the remuneration of central government civil servants since 2000. This table shows the evolution of gross and net specific indicators at current prices, the development in consumer price indices as well as gross and net specific indicators in real terms. Over the period 2000-2006 the real net specific indicator for the European Union has increased by 2.5%.[pic]14.  Control IndicatorsAnnex XI mentions explicitly, between the possible control indicators, the real per capita emoluments in central government. Eurostat measures the variation, at constant prices, in the per capita wage bill in sub-sector S.1311 of the national accounts (per capita salary of central government). As this indicator is expressed in gross terms, it is compared with the real gross specific indicator.The gross specific indicator and the control indicator are different by definition and it is natural to expect them to show some differences. Indeed, changes in the control indicator are determined not only by variations in collective labour agreements but also by intrinsic factors (changes in the average age of the reference population, promotion to higher categories, etc.) and by changes in incidental salary components such as overtime payments, productivity incentives, and early retirement compensation.Furthermore, there are certain factors which distort the statistical comparability of the two indices (the quality of the sample used to calculate the specific indicator, differences in the reference populations, part-time work, employers' social contributions, etc.). The deflator used for the control indicator is the consumers' expenditure deflator in the national accounts; the deflator for the specific indicator is the consumer price index (till 2004, the national index; since 2005 the harmonized index). In addition control indicator values for the reference period are often estimates.Eurostat identifies differences between the two indicators during the reference period, therefore puts a greater emphasis on the medium-term trend analysis. For some Member States there are in fact divergences. However, if the conceptual and statistical differences between the gross specific indicator and in the control indicator are netted out, they show a parallel development. Table 1.4 presents the changes in these two indicators for the period 2000-2006.More detailed tables on several control indicators are presented in Annex 2.[pic]15.  CHANGES IN THE COST OF LIVING IN BRUSSELSArticle 64 and Annex XI of the Staff Regulations state that Eurostat shall draw up an index, based on the data provided by the Belgian authorities, to measure the changes in the cost of living for officials of the Communities in Brussels.This index, known as Brussels International Index (BII), shall take into account the changes between June of the previous year and June of the current year and shall be based on methodology defined by the Working Group on Article 64 of the Staff Regulations.The following price indices are used to calculate Brussels International Index:1) For all 80 basic headings except for those stated in points 2) and 3) the Belgian harmonised indices of consumer prices (HICP).2) In order to take account of the specific situation in Brussels, for the following 9 basic headings the Brussels specific consumer price indices are used. These indices are provided by the “ Service public federal Economie, P.M.E.”-  Water supply-  Electricity-  Gas-  Other services in respect of personal transport equipment-  Passenger transport by road-  Combined passenger transport-  Restaurants, cafes and the like-  Accommodation services-  Hairdressing salons and personal grooming establishments3) The basic headings figures for accommodation costs for tenants (rents index) and owner-occupiers (imputed rents index) are replaced in the Brussels International Index by an index calculated by Eurostat based on the results of an annual survey carried out among EC staff employed in Brussels.The weights used to aggregate the 80 basic headings of this index are derived from family budget surveys (FBS) carried out among EU officials in Brussels. The details of the calculation of the BII corresponding to this annual review are given in the Eurostat Report. Table 2.1 shows both the annual and cumulative changes in the Brussels cost-of-living index since 1991.During the years 1990-2003 the cost of living in Brussels was calculated as a weighted index composed of the Joint Index and the Brussels capital component index. Since 2004, according to the Staff Regulations it is calculated as described above (Brussels International Index).[pic]16.  EQUIVALENCE OF PURCHASING POWER OF EC OFFICIALS IN THE MEMBER STATES17.  Economic parities and correction coefficientsThe object of the economic parities is to compare the relative costs of living of European institution officials in Brussels (reference city) and in each of the capitals and other places of employment for which a correction coefficient has been set. The method used is to compare the price of a "basket" of goods and services purchased by the average official in Brussels with the price of the same basket in each of the other places of employment. The average of all the price ratios is the "economic parity".The system works as follows: the total range of goods and services constituting the consumption of the average European institution official is divided into 80 basic headings (such as meat, footwear, motor cars, books). A price ratio between the place of employment and Brussels is established for each of these headings; this is called the basic parity. Price surveys are conducted on products selected to represent the basic heading and specified in the necessary detail to enable prices in a sufficiently narrow range to be collected.The Staff Regulations require each basic parity to be checked by direct survey at least once every five years. In practice checks are carried out at shorter intervals as part of the European Comparison Programme (ECP). At each annual salary review around one third of the basic price parities are replaced by new parities produced by the latest price surveys.For the 2006 annual review, new parities obtained from price surveys have been integrated for the following groups:-  House and garden (survey spring 2004);-  Transport, restaurants and hotels (survey autumn 2004).The 80 basic parities are then updated using the price index ratio between the place of employment and Brussels.Housing is dealt with differently. Special rent surveys of estate agents are carried out each year at each place of employment, including Brussels, to calculate an economic parity for the basic heading "accommodation costs for tenants". The calculation follows a methodology that has been developed by Eurostat in collaboration with the national statistical institutes of the Member States, based on the principle that the parity used should be calculated in such a way to allow European institution officials outside Brussels to live in dwellings of comparable quality to those occupied by European institution officials in Brussels. The basic parity "accommodation costs of owner-occupiers" is calculated by reference to the rent the owner-occupiers would pay if they were tenants (these are known as "imputed rents").In order to calculate the overall economic parities weights have to be applied to each basic heading according to its relative importance in the consumption basket. These weights are calculated directly from the results of the special family budget surveys conducted among European and international civil servants every five to seven years. The resulting structure reflects the consumption of the average international civil servant in Brussels and in each country or place of employment. New consumption weights have been introduced this year for Brussels and The Hague.Using the 80 basic parities and the specific weights the overall parity is calculated in two ways: the first uses the consumption pattern for the reference city (Brussels) (this is a type of Laspeyres index); the second uses the consumption pattern for the place of employment (this is a type of Paasche index). In accordance with the standard practice for international comparisons both types of index are calculated and the geometric mean of the results (the Fisher index) is used as the economic parity.The correction coefficients applicable to the salaries of the European institution officials working in the capitals and places of employment other than Brussels and Luxembourg, which are calculated for the month of July, are determined on the basis of the relationships between the economic parities and the exchange rates fixed by the Commission and specified in the Staff Regulations for the relevant countries. The correction coefficient operates as a percentage adjustment to salaries to take account of the cost of living differences between Brussels and the various duty stations.The details of the economic parities calculation, at the level of 12 main consumption groups, are shown in table 3.1 for all capitals and other places apart from Brussels and Luxembourg. This table also includes information about the consumption weights by country and by expenditure groups.18.  Rents and rent paritiesChanges in the rent parities are provided in the Table 3.2 which shows also the average rents by type of dwelling on which the calculation is based. These average rents are in fact weighted moving averages, based on a six-year model, to take into account the average occupancy length, which is estimated to be six years. Any annual updating of rents during the life of the typical lease is included in the model by using the appropriate adjustment indices.[pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic]19.  Purchasing power parities - analysis of results20.  Major changes in the economic parities from 2005 to 2006 [1]The calculation of correction coefficients used for salary adjustment in places other than Brussels and Luxembourg involves the revision of some of the elementary parities each year. For the 2006 salary adjustment two new price surveys have been incorporated: House and garden (conducted in spring 2004) and Transport, restaurants and hotels (conducted in autumn 2004). The rent parities have been calculated for 2006 according to the moving-average model approved by the Article 64 Working Party.The introduction of new prices from the latest price surveys affects 23 (out of 80) elementary parities and accounts for about 30% (EU average) of the consumption weight.Moreover, rent surveys are carried out every year in all Member States. A six-year moving average model is used for calculating rent parities: the rent parities for 2006 are based on the relative trend in the real-estate markets in Brussels and other places of employment between 2001 and 2006. These parities are, therefore, affected by the following factors:-  introduction of rent data for year 2006,-  deletion of the rent data for 2000,-  price indices used for updating the rents for 2001 - 2005 to price of 2006, and-  a new dwelling structure in all cities, except London, Dublin, Karlsruhe and VareseAll these effects, as well as the total change in rent parities, are shown in table 3.4.Changes in the global parities from one year to the next come mainly from both prices and rent revisions, but may also be affected by the trend in the price indices used to update the elementary parities at the date of the adjustment (1.7.2006) and by changes in the consumption structures (updated every five to seven years by the introduction of new FBS results)[2]. Details of the changes in the economic parities from 2005 to 2006, including a decomposition of all the effects, are given in table 3.3.The biggest increase in global economic parities can be observed in Ljubljana (+4.7%), Culham (+2.5) and Copenhagen (+1.6%). Some relevant decreases were observed in Prague (-10.6%), Bratislava (-5.4%), Warsaw (-5.2%) and Budapest (-3.2%).Biggest increases in the rent parity could be observed in Riga (+6.8%), Varese (+5.8%), Madrid (+5.6%) and Warsaw (+5.5%) while the biggest decreases were recorded in Paris (-2.8%), Munich (-2.1%) and Berlin (-1.9%).[pic][pic]21.  Differences in the correction coefficients calculated with and without the rent elementThe rent and imputed rent parities, due to their associated high consumption weights (21.9% EU average) influence in a quite significant way the global parities and consequently the correction coefficients. The analysis of correction coefficients calculated with and without the rent element for the same place of employment makes it easier to isolate the effect of rent differences separately from differences arising from other causes.The correction coefficient for rents (compared to Brussels =100) is very high in London (289.7) and Paris (186.2), whereas Nicosia records only 61.7 and Valetta 65.6.For the overall correction coefficient, however, the range is smaller: London (139.4), Copenhagen (137.9) compared to Vilnius (75.5).When rents are added to the computation, the correction coefficient is increased by more than 10% in London (+27.6%), Budapest (+14.5%), Paris (+13.2), Bucharest (+11.1) and Prague (+10.5). On the opposite situation are Nicosia (-7.8%) and Valletta (-7.1%).More details on the effect of rent on the 2006 correction coefficients are given in table 3.5.[pic]22.  EQUIVALENCE OF PURCHASING POWER OF EC PENSIONERS IN THE MEMBER STATES23.  Economic parities and correction coefficients for pensionersThe correction coefficients for pensioners with a reference date of 1 July 2006 have been calculated on the basis of the following information:-  Parities for all goods and services, except for rents, as used for the calculation of the correction coefficients for active staff. These parities are based on bilateral comparison of prices of about 3000 goods and services between different capital cities and Brussels (for more details see point 3.1 above).-  Country rent parities: For calculating country rent parities the following procedure has been applied in most of the countries. Calculate a spatial adjustment factor in the form of national/capital ratio of market rents derived from an official database like CPI, household budget survey, housing register, etc. With the help of this adjustment factor transform the capital city rent parity from Article 64 estate agency rent surveys to the country rent parity. The following exceptions to this general rule were agreed with the respective NSIs:-  Netherlands: No such adjustment factors were available for Netherlands, for which average country rents were compared directly with the average rents in Belgium (all derived from ECP-PPP rent surveys).-  Germany: As information on rents for four German cities (Berlin, Bonn, Karlsruhe and Munich) is available the ratio between the average of those cities and Berlin is used.-  Denmark: Due to the specificities of the rental market in Copenhagen, which is completely different from the market in the rest of the country, an estimate of the Copenhagen rent parity different from the one for staff is used as basis for the spatial adjustment factor. The new estimate is obtained averaging the staff rent parity with a rent ratio for the general population obtained from the NSI.-  Malta and Estonia: As no reliable information on the adjustment factors were available for Malta and Estonia a ratio equal 1 was used.Each National Statistical Institute is required each year to check and, if possible, to update their spatial adjustment factor.-  Consumption weights for the pensioners calculated on the basis of a wide scale family budget survey carried out in 2002.The details of the economic parities calculation, at the level of 12 main consumption groups, are shown in table 4.1 for all countries apart from Belgium and Luxembourg. This table also includes information about the consumption weights by country and by expenditure groups. Table 4.2 presents the rent ratios used in 2005 and 2006.The correction coefficients applicable to the EC pensioners are determined on the basis of the relationships between the economic parities and the exchange rates fixed by the Commission and specified in the Staff Regulations for the relevant countries. The correction coefficient operates as a percentage adjustment to pensions (only for the pension rights acquired before 1 May 2004; being the correction coefficient 100% for the pension rights acquired from that date) to take account of the cost of living differences between Belgium and the Member States, except Luxembourg where, according to the Staff Regulations, a correction coefficient of 100% is applied.[pic][pic]  [pic]24.  Purchasing power parities for pensioners – analysis of resultsTables 4.3 (decomposition of the effects[3]) and 4.4 (effect on rents on the correction coefficients) are similar to tables 3.3 and 3.5 already presented for the staff.[pic][pic]In 2006 for 12 countries out of 25, the rent correction coefficient (ratio between the rent parity and the exchange rate) is under 100. This means that the average rents are lower in these places than in Belgium.For 10 places out of 25 the correction coefficient without rent is higher than the global correction coefficient. This means that, for these places, the rents lead to a reduction of global correction coefficient.25.  Comparison of correction coefficients for staff and pensionersTable 4.5 compares the pensioners’ correction coefficients with those for active staff. Among all Member States, Denmark has the highest country-based CC (in case of capital-based CC it is London). The biggest differences between capital CCs and country CCs can be observed in the United Kingdom, Hungary and France. In Austria the two CCs are nearly at the same level. In all countries except in Germany, Estonia, Cyprus and Malta the country CCs are lower than capital CCs. Without rents, the two sets of CCs are closer.It should be mentioned that the Staff Regulations guarantee a minimum CC of 100 for pensioners, whatever is the result of Eurostat calculations.[pic]26.  INFORMATION ABOUT WORKING TIMEEurostat collects statistical information on differences in the working hours in all Member States. Information about statutory or contractual weekly working hours in central governments (Table 5.1), number of days of annual leave (Table 5.2) and number of public holidays per year (Table 5.3) are shown below. In all these tables the situation in July 2006 has been compared with that in July 2005.[pic][pic][pic]Annex 2 to the Eurostat Report on Annual Adjustment ofRemuneration and Pension Detailed remuneration tables and control indicatorsReference period:Year to 1 July 2006Commission Staff Working PaperTABLE OF CONTENTSDetailed Country Tables 54BELGIUM 55GERMANY 61SPAIN 67France 73Italy 79LUXEMBOURG 85NETHERLANDS 92UNITED KINGDOM 98TOTAL EMOLUMENTS IN THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES 107Detailed Country TablesBelgium[pic][pic][pic][pic][pic]  [pic]  [pic] [pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic] [pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic] [pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic]  [pic][pic][pic][pic]  [pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic]  [pic][pic]Total Emoluments in the Central Governments of the Member States[pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][1] This analysis has not been carried out for Bulgaria and Romania[2] New consumption structures for Brussels and The Hague have been introduced this year.[3] The decomposition of effects has not been carried out for Bulgaria and Romania.[pic][pic][pic][pic]