Case F-103/06: Action brought on 4 September 2006 — Blank and Others v Commission
Date: 2006-10-28
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European Commission, European official, action by staff, personnel administration, promotion, regulations for civil servants

28.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/35

Action brought on 4 September 2006 — Haelterman and
Others v Commission

(Case F-102/06)

(2006/C 261/71)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Geert Haelterman (Ninove, Belgium) and Others
(represented by: A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

promoted to Grade A*10 in the 2005 promotion proce-
dure, which decisions are to be implied from Administrative
Notice No 85-2005 of 23 November 2005;

— Directions to the AIPN as to the effects of the annulment of
the contested decisions and, in particular, reclassification of
the applicants in Grade A*10, with retrospective effect from
1 March 2005,

— In the alternative, as regards one of the applicants, first, a
direction to the defendant
to recognise him as being
eligible, on his next promotion, for promotion to Grade
A*10 and, second, to order the defendant to compensate
the same applicant for the loss he suffered as a result of not
being promoted to Grade A*10 from 1 March 2005;

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

— An order that the defendant pay the costs.

Form of order sought

Pleas in law and main arguments

— Annulment of the individual decisions rejecting the appli-
cants' applications for the adoption by the Appointing
Authority (AIPN) of transitional measures to guarantee, in
connection with the 2005 and subsequent promotion
procedures, equal treatment and their vested rights;

— An order that the Commission of the European Commu-

nities pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of their action, the applicants rely on pleas in law
identical to those pleaded in Case F-47/06. (1)

(1) OJEU C 154, 1.07.2006, p. 25.

Action brought on 4 September 2006 — Blank and Others
v Commission

(Case F-103/06)

(2006/C 261/72)

Language of the case: French

In support of their action, the applicants rely on pleas in law
very similar to those pleaded in Case F-45/06. (1)

(1) OJEU C 143, 17.06.2006, p. 39.

Action brought on 4 September 2006 — Arpaillange and
Others v Commission

(Case F-104/06)

(2006/C 261/73)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Joséphine Arpaillange (Santiago do Chile, Chile) and
Others (represented by: S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz,
lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Parties

Applicants: Klaus Blank (St. Stevens-Woluwe, Belgium) and
Others (represented by: S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz,
lawyers )

Form of order sought by the applicants

The applicants claim that the Court should:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Form of order sought

— Annulment of

(AIPN)

to enter

the refusal of

the Appointing Authority
the applicants on the list of officials

— annul the decisions of the authority authorised to conclude
contracts stipulating the applicants' conditions of employ-
ment, as set out in their contracts as contract staff, on the
ground that the number of years of professional experience
recognised in their cases by the authority authorised to
conclude contracts is less than the number of years' profes-
sional experience actually acquired by the applicants;