Case T-87/94: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 30 May 2006 — Blom and Others v Commission (Action for damages — Non-contractual liability — Milk — Additional levy — Reference quantity — Producers who entered into a non-marketing undertaking — SLOM 1983 producers — Failure to resume production on expiry of the undertaking)
Date: 2006-10-14
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: General Court (EU), action for annulment (EU), agricultural levy, farmer, indemnification, milk, non-marketing premium

C 249/10

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

14.10.2006

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 30 May 2006 —
Blom and Others v Commission

3. Reserves the disposal of the action in the same case, in so far as it
was brought by the applicants whose names appear in the annex.

(Case T-87/94) (1)

(1) OJ C 90, 26.3.1994.

(Action for damages — Non-contractual liability — Milk —
levy — Reference quantity — Producers who
Additional
entered into a non-marketing undertaking — SLOM 1983
producers — Failure to resume production on expiry of the
undertaking)

(2006/C 249/26)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicants: J.C. Blom (Blokker, Netherlands) and the other appli-
cants whose names appear in the annex to the judgment (repre-
sented by:
initially H. Bronkhorst and E. Pijnacker Hordijk,
lawyers, and subsequently by E. Pijnacker Hordijk)

Defendants: Council of the European Union (represented by:
initially A. Brautigam and A.-M. Colaert, Agents, and subse-
quently by A.-M. Colaert) and Commission of the European
initially T. van Rijn, Agent,
Communities (represented by:
assisted by H.-J. Rabe, lawyer, and subsequently by T. van Rijn)

Parties

Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 2
August 2006 — Aughinish Alumina Ltd v Commission

(Case T-69/06 R)

(Application for interim measures — Application for suspen-
sion of operation of a measure — State aid — Urgency)

(2006/C 249/27)

Language of the case: English

Re:

Application for compensation, under Article 178 of the EC
Treaty (now Article 235 EC) and the second paragraph of
Article 215 of the EC Treaty (now the second paragraph of
Article 288 EC), for damage allegedly suffered by the applicant
as a result of his having been prevented from marketing milk
by virtue of Council Regulation (EEC) No 857/84 of 31 March
1984 adopting general rules for the application of the levy
referred to in Article 5c of Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 in the
milk and milk products sector (OJ 1984 L 90, p. 13), as supple-
mented by Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1371/84 of 16
May 1984 laying down detailed rules for the application of the
additional
levy referred to in Article 5c of Regulation
No 804/68 (OJ 1984 L 132, p. 11).

Applicant: Aughinish Alumina Ltd (Askeaton, Ireland) (repre-
sented by: J. Handoll and C. Waterson, solicitors)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: N. Khan and K. Walkerová, Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of the operation of Commission
Decision 2006/323/EC of 7 December 2005 concerning the
exemption from excise duty on mineral oils used as fuel for
alumina production in Gardanne, in the Shannon region and in
Sardinia, respectively implemented by France, Ireland and Italy
(OJ 2006 L 119, p. 12) in so far as it relates to the applicant

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the order

The Court:

1. The application for interim measures is dismissed.

1. Dismisses the action,

in so far as it was brought by Mr J.C.

2. Costs are reserved.

Blom;

2. Orders the applicant to pay the costs;