do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1492/2006 of 10 October 2006 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2006-10-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: agri-monetary policy, citrus fruit, fruit vegetable, grape, import price, pip fruit

11.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 279/3

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1492/2006

of 10 October 2006

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and
vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty
Community,

establishing the European

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of
21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the
fruit and vegetables (1), and in
import arrangements
particular Article 4(1) thereof,

for

Whereas:

standard values for imports from third countries,
in
respect of the products and periods stipulated in the
Annex thereto.

(2)

In compliance with the above criteria,
the standard
import values must be fixed at the levels set out in the
Annex to this Regulation,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regu-
lation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex
hereto.

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 lays down, pursuant to the
outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade nego-
tiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 11 October 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 October 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY
Director-General for Agriculture and
Rural Development

(1) OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regu-

lation (EC) No 386/2005 (OJ L 62, 9.3.2005, p. 3).

L 279/4

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

11.10.2006

to Commission Regulation of 10 October 2006 establishing the standard import values for determining the
entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

ANNEX

CN code

0702 00 00

0707 00 05

0709 90 70

0805 50 10

0806 10 10

0808 10 80

0808 20 50

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

(EUR/100 kg)

052
096
999

052
999

052
999

052
388
524
528
999

052
096
400
624
999

388
400
508
512
720
800
804
999

052
720
999

72,1
43,7
57,9

88,5
88,5

86,0
86,0

55,5
61,7
56,2
58,0
57,9

99,0
48,4
178,4
137,8
115,9

82,9
103,3
74,9
79,2
74,9
149,8
99,7
95,0

114,0
56,3
85,2

(1) Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 750/2005 (OJ L 126, 19.5.2005, p. 12). Code ‘999’ stands for ‘of

other origin’.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4307 — Toyota Tsusho/T.T. Holding/JV) Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2006-10-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: distributive trades, economic concentration, merger control, motor vehicle industry, restrictive-practice authorisation, spare part

C 243/4

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

10.10.2006

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4307 — Toyota Tsusho/T.T. Holding/JV)

(2006/C 243/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 6 September 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to
declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regu-
lation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public
after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This
website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case
number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4307. EUR-Lex is the on-

line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4331 — Arcelor/Bamesa/Bamesa Otel)

(2006/C 243/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 8 September 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to
declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regu-
lation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public
after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This
website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case
number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4331. EUR-Lex is the on-

line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2006-10-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate

10.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/1

I

(Information)

COMMISSION

Euro exchange rates (1)

9 October 2006

(2006/C 243/01)

1 euro =

Currency

Exchange rate

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

JPY

DKK

GBP

SEK

CHF

ISK

NOK

BGN

CYP

CZK

EEK

HUF

LTL

LVL

MTL

PLN

US dollar

Japanese yen

Danish krone

Pound sterling

Swedish krona

Swiss franc

Iceland króna

Norwegian krone

Bulgarian lev

Cyprus pound

Czech koruna

Estonian kroon

Hungarian forint

Lithuanian litas

Latvian lats

Maltese lira

Polish zloty

RON

Romanian leu

1,2603

150,09

7,4566

0,67560

9,2800

1,5890

86,49

8,4200

1,9558

0,5767

28,192

15,6466

272,03

3,4528

0,6961

0,4293

3,9208

3,5074

SIT

SKK

TRY

Slovenian tolar

Slovak koruna

Turkish lira

AUD Australian dollar

CAD

HKD

Canadian dollar

Hong Kong dollar

NZD New Zealand dollar

SGD

Singapore dollar

239,60

37,082

1,8924

1,6927

1,4154

9,8169

1,9160

2,0040

KRW South Korean won

1 214,74

ZAR

CNY

HRK

IDR

South African rand

Chinese yuan renminbi

Croatian kuna

9,8614

9,9557

7,4145

Indonesian rupiah

11 630,05

MYR Malaysian ringgit

PHP

RUB

THB

Philippine peso

Russian rouble

Thai baht

4,6568

63,198

33,8750

47,356

(1) Source:

reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4310 — Phelps Dodge/INCO) Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2006-10-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electrical industry, merger control, mining industry, restrictive-practice authorisation

10.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/3

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4338 — Cinven-Warburg Pincus/Casema-Multikabel)

(2006/C 243/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 6 September 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to
declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regu-
lation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public
after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This
website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case
number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4338. EUR-Lex is the on-

line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4310 — Phelps Dodge/INCO)

(2006/C 243/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 6 September 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to
declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regu-
lation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public
after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This
website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case
number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4310. EUR-Lex is the on-

line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4331 — Arcelor/Bamesa/Bamesa Otel) Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2006-10-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Romania, economic concentration, iron and steel industry, merger control, restrictive-practice authorisation

C 243/4

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

10.10.2006

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4307 — Toyota Tsusho/T.T. Holding/JV)

(2006/C 243/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 6 September 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to
declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regu-
lation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public
after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This
website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case
number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4307. EUR-Lex is the on-

line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4331 — Arcelor/Bamesa/Bamesa Otel)

(2006/C 243/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 8 September 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to
declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regu-
lation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public
after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This
website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case
number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4331. EUR-Lex is the on-

line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)
Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 of 15 November 2005 on microbiological criteria for foodstuffs ( OJ L 338, 22.12.2005 )
Date: 2006-10-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: agri-foodstuffs, crustacean, food inspection, food safety, foodstuffs legislation, labelling, meat product, mollusc, research method

L 278/32

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

10.10.2006

CORRIGENDA

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 of 15 November 2005 on microbiological criteria
for foodstuffs

(Official Journal of the European Union L 338 of 22 December 2005)

On page 10, Annex I, Chapter 1, column headed ‘Food category’, fourth entry:
for:

‘1.12. Milk powder and whey powder (10)’,
‘1.12. Milk powder and whey powder’.

read:

On page 18, Annex I, Chapter 2, point 2.2.1., column headed ‘Limits m and M’:

for:

read:

‘m

<1 cfu/ml

M

5 cfu/ml’

‘m

<1/ml

M

5/ml’

On page 19, Annex I, Chapter 2, point 2.2.7, against the entry ‘Enterobacteriaceae’, column headed ‘Analytical reference
method’:
for:

‘ISO 21528-1’,
‘ISO 21528-2’.

read:

On page 22, Annex I, Chapter 2, point 2.4.1, against the entry ‘E. coli’, column ‘Limits m and M’:

for:

read:

‘m

1 cfu/g

‘m

1/g

M

10 cfu/g’

M

10/g’
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4338 — Cinven-Warburg Pincus/Casema-Multikabel) Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2006-10-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Internet access provider, economic concentration, investment company, merger control, restrictive-practice authorisation, telecommunications industry

10.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/3

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4338 — Cinven-Warburg Pincus/Casema-Multikabel)

(2006/C 243/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 6 September 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to
declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regu-
lation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public
after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This
website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case
number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4338. EUR-Lex is the on-

line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4310 — Phelps Dodge/INCO)

(2006/C 243/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 6 September 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to
declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regu-
lation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public
after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This
website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case
number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4310. EUR-Lex is the on-

line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4266 — Atel Energia/Azienda Energetica — Etschwerke/ENERG.IT) Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2006-10-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electrical energy, energy production, merger control, provision of services, restrictive-practice authorisation

10.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/5

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4266 — Atel Energia/Azienda Energetica — Etschwerke/ENERG.IT)

(2006/C 243/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 17 August 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to
declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regu-
lation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public
after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

— from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This
website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case
number, date and sectoral indexes,

— in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4266. EUR-Lex is the on-

line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1498/2006 of 10 October 2006 amending the rates of refunds applicable to certain products from the sugar sector exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty
Date: 2006-10-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: export refund, white sugar

11.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 279/15

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1498/2006

of 10 October 2006

amending the rates of refunds applicable to certain products from the sugar sector exported in the
form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

(2)

Having regard to the Treaty
Community,

establishing the European

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20
February 2006 on the common organisation of the market in
the sugar sector (1), and in particular Article 33(2)(a) and (4)
thereof,

Whereas:

(1)

The rates of the refunds applicable from 29 September
2006 to the products listed in the Annex, exported in the
form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty,
were
by Commission Regulation (EC) No
1433/2006 (2).

fixed

It follows from applying the rules and criteria contained
in Regulation (EC) No 1433/2006 to the information at
present available to the Commission that
the export
refunds at present applicable should be altered as
shown in the Annex hereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The rates of refund fixed by Regulation (EC) No 1433/2006 are
hereby altered as shown in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 11 October 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 October 2006.

For the Commission

Günter VERHEUGEN
Vice-President

(1) OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 270, 29.9.2006, p. 58.

L 279/16

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

11.10.2006

Rates of refunds applicable from 11 October 2006 to certain products from the sugar sector exported in the
form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty (1)

ANNEX

CN code

Description

Rate of refund in EUR/100 kg

In case of advance fixing of
refunds

1701 99 10

White sugar

26,48

Other

26,48

(1) The rates set out in this Annex are not applicable to exports to Bulgaria, with effect from 1 October 2004, to Romania with effect
from 1 December 2005, and to the goods listed in Tables I and II to Protocol No 2 to the Agreement between the European
Community and the Swiss Confederation of 22 July 1972 exported to the Swiss Confederation or to the Principality of Liechtenstein
with effect from 1 February 2005.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1499/2006 of 10 October 2006 on the issue of import licences for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal
Date: 2006-10-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: beef, fresh meat, frozen product, import licence, product quality, refrigerated product

11.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 279/17

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1499/2006

of 10 October 2006

on the issue of import licences for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty
Community,

establishing the European

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of
17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in
beef and veal (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 936/97 of
27 May 1997 opening and providing for the administration of
tariff quotas for high-quality fresh, chilled and frozen beef and
for frozen buffalo meat (2),

Whereas:

(1)

(2)

Regulation (EC) No 936/97 provides in Articles 4 and 5
the conditions for applications and for the issue of
import licences for meat referred to in Article 2(f).

Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 fixes the
amount of high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and
veal meeting the definition laid down therein which may

be imported on special terms for the period 1 July 2006
to 30 June 2007 at 11 500 t.

(3)

It should be recalled that licences issued pursuant to this
Regulation will, throughout
the period of validity, be
open for use only in so far as provisions on health
protection in force permit,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

1.
All applications for import licences from 1 to 5 October
2006 for high-quality fresh, chilled or frozen beef and veal as
referred to in Article 2(f) of Regulation (EC) No 936/97 shall be
granted in full.

2.
Applications for licences may be submitted, in accordance
with Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 936/97, during the first
five days of November 2006 for 4 055,544 t.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 11 October 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 October 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY
Director-General for Agriculture and
Rural Development

(1) OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regu-

lation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2).

(2) OJ L 137, 28.5.1997, p. 10. Regulation as last amended by Regu-

lation (EC) No 408/2006 (OJ L 71, 10.3.2006, p. 3).