Case F-77/06: Action brought on 18 July 2006 — Colovea v European Parliament
Date: 2006-09-30
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European Parliament, action by staff, part-time employment, pay, servant (EU), staff regulations (EU)

C 237/16

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

30.9.2006

The applicant also requests compensation for the illegal termi-
nation of his contract. Finally, he requests compensation from
Cedefop, relying on the provisions relating to non-contractual
responsibility of the community bodies, because of the alleged
attack made on his character and his professional reputation by
the decision to dismiss him and by the content of the decision
taken by the Appeals committee concerning the complaint
lodged by the abovementioned employee.

— thirdly, breach of the principle of protection of legitimate

expectations.

Action brought on 18 July 2006 — Tsirimokos v European
Parliament

(Case F-76/06)

(2006/C 237/27)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant:
(represented by: J. Choucroun, lawyer)

Ioannis Tsirimokos

(Senningerberg, Luxembourg)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

— annul the European Parliament′s decision of 25 October

2005 confirmed 19 April 2006;

— order the European Parliament to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant, a European Parliament official since 1 May
1981, lodged, 7 September 2005 a request to work part time
in preparation for retirement, as provided for by Article 55a of
the Staff Regulations and Article 4 of Annex IVa of the Staff
Regulations. In the calculation of the percentage of the basic
salary to which the applicant was entitled, the administration
did not take into account the years of pensionable service that
the applicant had acquired before being recruited by the Euro-
pean Parliament.

Action brought on 18 July 2006 — Colovea v European
Parliament

(Case F-77/06)

(2006/C 237/28)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Fotini Colovea (Luxembourg, Luxembourg)
sented by: J. Choucroun, lawyer)

(repre-

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

— annul the European Parliament′s decision of 20 September

2005, confirmed 19 April 2006;

— order the European Parliament to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant was recruited by the European Parliament as a
member of the temporary staff at Grade B5 on 1 May 1981.
On 4 August 2005 she introduced a request of to work part
time in preparation for retirement, as provided for by Article
55a of the Staff Regulations and Article 4 of Annex IVa of the
Staff Regulations. In the calculation of the percentage of the
basic salary to which the applicant was entitled, the administra-
tion did not take into account the years of pensionable service
that the applicant had acquired before being recruited by the
European Parliament.

In support of his action, the applicant invokes three pleas in
law:

— firstly, breach of Article 2 of Annex VIII of the Staff Regula-

tions;

In support of his action, the applicant invokes three pleas in
law:

— secondly, breach of the duty to have regard for the welfare

of officials;

— firstly, breach of Article 2 of Annex VIII of the Staff Regula-

— thirdly, breach of the principle of protection of legitimate

tions;

expectations.

— secondly, breach of the duty to have regard for the welfare

of officials;