do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T -371/05: Order of the Court of First Instance of 24 July 2006 — AITEC and Others v Commission
Date: 2006-09-30
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, European Commissioner, Italy, State aid, action for annulment (EU), cement, powers of the institutions (EU), tradeable emission permit

C 237/14

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

30.9.2006

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition partially upheld.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

In support of his claims,

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regu-
lation 40/94.
the applicant puts
forward the dissimilarity of the two marks with regards to the
relevant consumer circles, as well as the phonetic, visual and
conceptual differences between the earlier mark and the
contested one.

Order of the Court of First Instance of 24 July 2006 —
AITEC and Others v Commission

(Case T -371/05) (1)

(2006/C 237/25)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case
be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 296, 26.11.2005.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2006-09-30
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate

30.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 236/1

I

(Information)

COMMISSION

Euro exchange rates (1)

29 September 2006

(2006/C 236/01)

1 euro =

Currency

Exchange rate

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

JPY

DKK

GBP

SEK

CHF

ISK

NOK

BGN

CYP

CZK

EEK

HUF

LTL

LVL

MTL

PLN

US dollar

Japanese yen

Danish krone

Pound sterling

Swedish krona

Swiss franc

Iceland króna

Norwegian krone

Bulgarian lev

Cyprus pound

Czech koruna

Estonian kroon

Hungarian forint

Lithuanian litas

Latvian lats

Maltese lira

Polish zloty

RON

Romanian leu

1,2660

149,34

7,4576

0,67770

9,2797

1,5881

88,67

8,2350

1,9558

0,5767

28,326

15,6466

273,00

3,4528

0,6960

0,4293

3,9713

3,5362

SIT

SKK

TRY

Slovenian tolar

Slovak koruna

Turkish lira

AUD Australian dollar

CAD

HKD

Canadian dollar

Hong Kong dollar

NZD New Zealand dollar

SGD

Singapore dollar

239,59

37,385

1,9112

1,6992

1,4136

9,8640

1,9427

2,0076

KRW South Korean won

1 198,02

ZAR

CNY

HRK

IDR

South African rand

Chinese yuan renminbi

Croatian kuna

9,8277

10,0066

7,3895

Indonesian rupiah

11 678,85

MYR Malaysian ringgit

PHP

RUB

THB

Philippine peso

Russian rouble

Thai baht

4,668

63,490

33,9420

47,572

(1) Source:

reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-219/06: Action brought on 17 August 2006 — PTV v OHIM (map&guide travelbook)
Date: 2006-09-30
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), satellite navigation, software, trade-mark law

30.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/13

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 59 of Regulation (EC) No
40/94 (1) and Rules 48, 49 and 96 of Regulation (EC) No
2868/95 (2),
infringement of Article 78 and Article 78a of
Regulation No 40/94 and infringement of the principle by
which OHIM is bound by its own decisions and the principle
of proportionality.

Pleas in law: The mark applied for does have distinctive char-
acter for the purposes of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No
40/94 (1).

(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the

Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the

Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

(2) Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 of 13 December 1995
implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Com-
munity trade mark (OJ 1995 L 303, p. 1).

Action brought on 17 August 2006 — PTV v OHIM
(map&guide travelbook)

(Case T-219/06)

(2006/C 237/23)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Action brought on 18 August 2006 — Hipp & Co v OHMI
— Laboratorios Ordesa (BEBIMIL)

(Case T-221/06)

(2006/C 237/24)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Hipp & Co (Kommanditgesellschaft) (Sachseln, Swit-
zerland) (represented by: M. Kinkeldey, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market
(Trade Marks and Designs)

Applicant: PTV Planung Transport Verkehr AG (Karlsruhe,
Germany) (represented by F. Nielsen, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Labora-
torios Ordesa S.L. (Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market
(Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

Forms of order sought

— set aside the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the
Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 8 June
2006 (Appeal case number: R 1174/2005-1);

— Annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of
the Office of Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 2
June 2006 (Case No R571/2005-1),

— order the costs of the proceedings to be borne by the defen-

dant.

— order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘map&guide
travelbook’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 16 and 42.

Decision of the Examiner: Partial dismissal of the application.

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant.

Community trade mark concerned: The community word mark
‘BEBIMIL’ for goods in classes 5, 29, 30 and 32.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:
Laboratorios Ordesa S.L.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Mark or
‘BLEMIL’ for goods in classes 5 and 29, 6 and 32 respectively.

sign cited: Community and national word mark
Corrigendum to Council Decision 2004/512/EC of 8 June 2004 establishing the Visa Information System (VIS) ( OJ L 213, 15.6.2004 )
Date: 2006-09-30
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: admission of aliens, information system

30.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 271/85

Corrigendum to Council Decision 2004/512/EC of 8 June 2004 establishing the Visa Information System (VIS)

(Official Journal of the European Union L 213 of 15 June 2004)

CORRIGENDA

On page 5, in recital 4:

for:

‘(4)

read:

‘(4)

This Decision constitutes the required legal basis to allow for the inclusion in the general budget of the
European Union of the necessary appropriations for the development of VIS and the execution of that part
of the budget.’,

This Decision constitutes the required legal basis to allow for the inclusion in the general budget of the
European Union of the necessary appropriations for the development of VIS and the execution of that part
of the budget, including preparatory measures necessary for biometric features to be incorporated at a later
stage in accordance with the Council conclusions of 19 February 2004.’