Case T-285/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 13 July 2006 –Andrieu v Commission (Officials — Action for annulment — Career development report — Rights of the defence — Action for damages — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2006-09-16
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, European official, action by staff, professional career, report, staff assessment

16.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/39

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 13 July 2006 –
Andrieu v Commission

Re:

(Case T-285/04) (1)

(Officials — Action for annulment — Career development
report — Rights of the defence — Action for damages —
Inadmissibility)

(2006/C 224/83)

Language of the case: French

Application for annulment of the decisions of the director of
Cedefop of 28 January 2004, appointing certain persons as
Heads of Area.

Operative part of the Judgment

(1) The decisions of the director of the European Centre for the Devel-
opment of Vocational Training (Cedefop) of 28 January 2004
appointing certain persons as Heads of Areas A to D are
annulled.

Parties

(2) Cedefop shall bear the costs

Applicant: Michel Andrieu (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by:
S. Rodrigues and Y. Minatchy, lawyers)

(1) OJ C 284 of 20.11.2004.

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: G. Berscheid and L. Lozano Palacios, acting as
Agents, and M. Genton, lawyer)

Re:

Firstly, action for annulment of the applicant's career develop-
ment report for 2001/2002 and, secondly, action for damages

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders each party to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 262, 23.10.2004.

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 July 2006 —
Fries Guggenheim v Cedefop

(Case T-373/04) (1)

(European Centre
of Vocational
Training — Posts of heads of area — Filling of posts by reas-
signment — No provision for a selection procedure)

the Development

for

(2006/C 224/84)

Language of the case: French

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 13 July 2006 —
IMPALA v Commission

(Case T-464/04) (1)

(Competition — Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 — Decision
declaring a concentration compatible with the common
market — Markets for recorded music and on-line music —
Existence of a collective dominant position — Risk of crea-
tion of a collective dominant position — Conditions —
Transparency of the market — Deterrence — Statement of
reasons — Manifest error of assessment)

(2006/C 224/85)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Independent Music Publishers and Labels Associa-
tion (Impala,
(Brussels, Belgium)
(represented by: S. Crosby and J. Golding, Solicitors, and I.
Wekstein-Steg, lawyer)

international association)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: A. Whelan and K Mojzesowicz, Agents)

Interveners: Bertelsmann AG (Gütersloh, Germany) (represented
by: J. Boyce, Solicitor, P. Chappatte and D. Loukas, lawyers),
Sony BMG Music Entertainment BV (Vianen, Netherlands) and
Sony Corporation of America (SCA) (New York, United States)
(represented by: N. Levy, Barrister, R. Snelders and T. Graf,
lawyers)

Parties

Re:

Applicant: Éric Mathias
Greece) (represented by: M.-A. Lucas, lawyer)

Fries Guggenheim (Thessasoniki,

Defendant: European Centre for the Development of Vocational
Training (Cedefop) (represented by: B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Annulment of Commission Decision C(2004) 2815 of 19 July
2004 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the
common market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement
(Case No COMP/M.3333 — Sony/BMG)