2006/861/EC: Commission Decision of 28 July 2006 concerning the technical specification of interoperability relating to the subsystem rolling stock — freight wagons of the trans-European conventional rail system (notified under document number C(2006) 3345) Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2006-07-28
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: carriage of goods, rail transport, technical standard, trans-European network

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/1

II

(Acts whose publication is not obligatory)

COMMISSION

COMMISSION DECISION

of 28 July 2006

concerning the technical specification of interoperability relating to the subsystem ‘rolling stock —
freight wagons’ of the trans-European conventional rail system

(notified under document number C(2006) 3345)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/861/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Commu-
nity,

Having regard to Directive 2001/16/EC of 19 March 2001 of the
European Parliament and of the Council on the interoperability
of the conventional rail system (1), and in particular Article 6(1)
thereof,

Whereas:

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

In accordance with Article 2(c) of Directive 2001/16/EC,
the trans-European conventional rail system is subdivided
into structural and functional subsystems.

the Directive, the
In accordance with Article 23(1) of
subsystem ‘rolling stock — freight wagons’ needs to be
covered by a technical specification for interoperability
(TSI).

The first step in establishing a TSI is to have a draft TSI
drawn up by the European Association for Railway
Interoperability (AEIF) which was appointed as the joint
representative body.

The AEIF has been given a mandate to draw up a draft TSI
for the ‘rolling stock — freight wagons’ subsystem in
accordance with Article 6(1) of Directive 2001/16/EC. The
basic parameters for
this draft TSI were adopted by
Commission Decision 2004/446/EC of 29 April 2004

the Noise, Freight
specifying the basic parameters of
Wagons and Telematics applications for freight Technical
Specifications for Interoperability referred to in Directive
2001/16/EC (2).

The draft TSI set up on the basis of the basic parameters
was accompanied by an introductory report containing a
cost-benefit analysis as provided for in Article 6(5) of the
Directive.

The draft TSIs have been examined by the Committee set
up by Council Directive 96/48/EC of 23 July 1996 on the
the trans-European high-speed rail
interoperability of
system (3) and referred to in Article 21 of Directive 2001/
16/EC, in the light of the introductory report.

(5)

(6)

(7) Directive 2001/16/EC and the TSIs do apply to renewals
but not
to maintenance-related replacements. However
Member States are encouraged, when they are able to do so
and where it is justified by the scope of the maintenance-
related work, to apply the TSIs to maintenance-related
replacements.

(8)

The putting into service of new, renewed or upgraded
wagons must also take into full consideration the impact on
the environment; this includes the impact of noise. It is
therefore important that the implementation of the TSI
in
being the subject of
conjunction with the requirements of the Noise TSI, to
the extent that the Noise TSI applies to freight wagons.

this Decision is carried out

(1) OJ L 110, 20.4.2001, p. 1. Directive as amended by Directive
2004/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ
L 164, 30.4.2004, p. 114, corrected by OJ L 220, 21.6.2004, p. 40).

(2) OJ L 155, 30.4.2004, p. 1, corrected by OJ L 193, 1.6.2004, p. 1
(3) OJ L 235, 17.9.1996, p. 6. Directive as last amended by Directive

2004/50/EC.

L 344/2

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

(9)

(10)

In its current version the TSI does not fully deal with all
aspects of interoperability; the items which are not dealt
with are classified as ‘Open Points’ in Annex JJ of the TSI.
Given that the verification of interoperability has to be
established by reference to the requirements of the TSIs, in
accordance with Article 16(2) of Directive 2001/16/EC, it is
necessary, during the transition period between the
publication of this Decision and the full implementation
of the attached TSI, to lay down the conditions to be
complied with in addition to those explicitly referred to in
the TSI attached.

Individual Member States are to inform the other Member
the relevant national
States and the Commission of
technical rules in use for achieving interoperability and
meeting the essential requirements of Directive 2001/16/EC
as well as of the bodies it appoints for carrying out the
procedure for the assessment of conformity or suitability
for use as well as the checking procedure in use for
verifying the interoperability of subsystems within the
meaning of Article 16(2) of Directive 2001/16/EC. For this
latter purpose, Member States should apply, as far as
in
possible,
Directive 2001/16/EC for the implementation of Article 16
(2) in making use of the bodies notified under Article 20 of
Directive 2001/16/EC. The Commission should carry out
an analysis of the information forwarded by the Member
States, in the form of national rules, procedures, bodies in
charge of implementing procedures, and duration of these
procedures, and, where appropriate, should discuss with the
Committee the need for the adoption of any measures.

the principles and criteria provided for

(11) The TSI in question should not demand the use of specific
technologies or technical solutions except where this is
strictly necessary for the interoperability of
the trans-
European conventional rail system.

(12) The TSI is based on best available expert knowledge at the
time of preparation of the relevant draft. Developments in
technology, operational, safety or social requirements may
make it necessary to amend or supplement this TSI. Where
applicable, a review or updating procedure should be
initiated in accordance with Article 6(3) of Directive 2001/
16/EC.

(13) To encourage innovation and in order to take into account
the experience acquired, the attached TSI should be subject
to a periodical revision at regular intervals.

necessary that the Commission examine those agreements
in order to determine whether the TSI presented in this
Decision needs to be revised accordingly.

(16)

In order to avoid any confusion, it is necessary to state that
the provisions of Decision 2004/446/EC which concern the
basic parameters of the trans-European conventional rail
system shall not apply anymore.

(17) The provisions of this Decision are in conformity with the
opinion of the Committee set up by Article 21 of Directive
96/48/EC,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

A Technical Specification for Interoperability (TSI) relating to the
‘rolling stock — freight wagons’ subsystem of the trans-European
conventional system referred to in Article 6(1) of Directive 2001/
16/EC is hereby adopted by the Commission.

The TSI shall be as set out in the Annex to this Decision.

The TSI shall be fully applicable to the freight wagon rolling
stock of the trans-European conventional rail system as defined
in Annex I to Directive 2001/16/EC, account being taken of
Articles 2 and 3 of this Decision.

Article 2

1. With regard to those issues classified as ‘Open points’ set out
in Annex JJ of the TSI, the conditions to be complied with for the
verification of the interoperability pursuant to Article 16(2) of
Directive 2001/16/EC shall be those applicable technical rules in
use in the Member State which authorise the putting into service
of the subsystem covered by this Decision.

2.
Each Member State shall notify to the other Member States
and to the Commission within six months of the notification of
this Decision:

(a)

(b)

(c)

the list of
paragraph 1;

the applicable technical rules mentioned in

the conformity assessment and checking procedures to be
applied with regard to the application of these rules;

the bodies it appoints for carrying out those conformity-
assessment and checking procedures.

(14) Where innovative solutions are proposed the manufacturer
or the contracting entity shall state the deviation from the
relevant section of the TSI. The European Rail Agency will
finalise the appropriate functional and interface specifica-
tions of the solution and develop the assessment methods.

Article 3

Member States shall notify the following types of agreement to
the Commission within six months of the entry into force of the
attached TSI:

(15) Freight wagons currently operate under existing national,
bilateral, multinational or international agreements. It is
important that those agreements do not hinder current and
future progress towards interoperability. To this end, it is

(a)

national, bilateral or multilateral agreements between
Member States and railway undertakings or infrastructure
managers, agreed on either a permanent or a temporary
basis and necessitated by the very specific or local nature of
the intended transport service;

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/3

(b)

(c)

bilateral or multilateral agreements between railway under-
takings, infrastructure managers or safety authorities which
deliver significant levels of
interoper-
ability;

local or regional

international agreements between one or more Member
States and at least one third country, or between railway
undertakings or infrastructure managers of Member States
and at
least one railway undertaking or infrastructure
manager of a third country which deliver significant levels
of local or regional interoperability.

Article 5

This Decision shall become applicable six months after the date
of its notification.

Article 6

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Article 4

Done at Brussels, 28 July 2006.

Those provisions of Decision 2004/446/EC which concern the
basic parameters of the trans-European conventional rail system
shall no longer apply as from the date on which this Decision
becomes applicable.

For the Commission

Jacques BARROT

Vice-President

L 344/4

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

ANNEX

Technical Specification for Interoperability relating to the subsystem Rolling Stock — Freight Wagons

Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

TECHNICAL SCOPE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

GEOGRAPHICAL SCOPE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

CONTENT OF THIS TSI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Definition of subsystem/scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

DEFINITION OF SUBSYSTEM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

FUNCTIONS OF SUBSYSTEM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

INTERFACES OF SUBSYSTEM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Essential requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

GENERAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

THE ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS RELATE TO:

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1.

1.1.

1.2.

1.3.

2.

2.1

2.2.

2.3.

3.

3.1.

3.2.

3.3.

3.3.1.

Safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.3.2.

Reliability and availability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.3.3.

Health . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.3.4.

Environmental protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.3.5.

Technical compatibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.4.

REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIC TO THE ROLLING STOCK SUBSYSTEM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.4.1.

Safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.4.2.

Reliability and availability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.4.3.

Technical compatibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.5.

REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIC TO MAINTENANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.5.1.

Health and safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.5.2.

Environmental protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.5.3.

Technical compatibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.6.

REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIC TO OTHER SUBSYSTEMS CONCERNING ALSO THE ROLLING STOCK
SUBSYSTEM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.6.1.

Infrastructure Subsystem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.6.1.1.

Safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

19

19

19

19

19

19

20

20

21

21

22

22

22

24

24

24

25

26

26

27

27

28

28

28

28

28

28

28

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/5

3.6.2.

Energy Subsystem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.6.2.1.

Safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.6.2.2.

Environmental protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.6.2.3.

Technical compatibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

29

29

29

29

3.6.3.

Control and command and signalling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

29

3.6.3.1.

Safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.6.3.2.

Technical compatibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

29

29

3.6.4.

Operation and traffic management

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

30

3.6.4.1.

Safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.6.4.2.

Reliability and availability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.6.4.3.

Technical compatibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.6.5.

Telematics applications for freight and passengers

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.6.5.1.

Technical compatibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.6.5.2.

Reliability and availability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.6.5.3.

Health . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.6.5.4.

Safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.

4.1.

4.2.

Characterisation of the subsystem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

FUNCTIONAL AND TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS OF THE SUBSYSTEM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.1.

General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.2.

Structures and mechanical parts:

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.2.1.

Interface (e. g. Coupling) between vehicles, between set of vehicles and between trains . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.2.1.1.

General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.2.1.2.

Functional and technical specifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.2.1.2.1. Buffers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.2.1.2.2. Draw Gear . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.2.1.2.3.

Interaction of draw- and buffing-gear . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.2.2.

Safe access and egress for rolling stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.2.3.

Strength of Main Vehicle Structure and Securing of Freight . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

30

30

30

30

30

31

31

31

31

31

31

31

33

33

33

33

33

33

34

34

35

L 344/6

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

4.2.2.3.1.

General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.2.3.2.

Exceptional Loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.2.3.2.1. Longitudinal Design Loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.2.3.2.2. Maximum Vertical Load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.2.3.2.3. Load combinations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.2.3.2.4. Lifting and Jacking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.2.3.2.5. Equipment Attachment (Including body/bogie) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.2.3.2.6. Other Exceptional Loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.2.3.3.

Service (fatigue) Loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.2.3.3.1. Sources of load input. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.2.3.3.2. Demonstration of fatigue strength . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.2.3.4.

Stiffness of the main vehicle structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.2.3.4.1. Deflections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.2.3.4.2. Modes of vibration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.2.3.4.3. Torsional stiffness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.2.3.4.4. Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.2.3.5.

Securing of Freight . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.2.4.

Doors closing and locking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.2.5.

Marking of freight wagons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.2.6.

Dangerous goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.2.6.1.

General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.2.6.2.

Legislation applicable to rolling stock for the transport of dangerous goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.2.6.3. Additional legislation applicable to tanks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.2.6.4. Maintenance rules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.3.

Vehicle track interaction and gauging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.3.1.

Kinematic gauge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.3.2.

Static axle load and linear load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.3.3.

Rolling stock parameters which influence ground based train monitoring systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

35

36

36

36

37

37

37

37

37

37

38

38

38

38

38

38

38

38

39

39

39

39

40

40

40

40

41

43

4.2.3.3.1.

Electrical resistance:

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

43

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/7

4.2.3.3.2. Hot axle box detection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.3.4.

Vehicle dynamic behaviour . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.3.4.1.

General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.3.4.2.

Functional and technical specifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.3.4.2.1. Safety against derailment and running stability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.3.4.2.2. Safety against derailment when running on twisted tracks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.3.4.2.3. Maintenance rules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.3.4.2.4. Suspension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.3.5.

Longitudinal compressive forces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.3.5.1.

General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.3.5.2.

Functional and technical specifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.4.

Braking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.4.1.

Braking performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.4.1.1.

General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.4.1.2.

Functional and Technical Specification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.4.1.2.1. Control train line . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.4.1.2.2. Braking Performance elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.4.1.2.3. Mechanical components . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.4.1.2.4. Energy storage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.4.1.2.5. Energy limits:

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.4.1.2.6. Wheel slide protection (WSP)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.4.1.2.7. Air-supply . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.4.1.2.8. Parking Brake . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.5.

Communication . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.5.1.

Vehicle capability to transmit information from vehicle to vehicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.5.2.

Vehicle capability to transmit information between ground and vehicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.5.2.1.

General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.5.2.2.

Functional and technical specification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.5.2.3. Maintenance rules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

43

43

43

44

44

45

45

45

45

45

46

47

47

47

47

47

47

52

52

52

53

53

53

54

54

54

54

54

55

L 344/8

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

4.2.6.

Environmental conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.6.1.

Environmental conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.6.1.1.

General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.6.1.2.

Functional and technical specifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.6.1.2.1. Altitude . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.6.1.2.2. Temperature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.6.1.2.3. Humidity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.6.1.2.4. Air movement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.6.1.2.5. Rain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.6.1.2.6. Snow, ice and hail

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.6.1.2.7. Solar radiation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.6.1.2.8. Resistance to Pollution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.6.2.

Aerodynamic effects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.6.3.

Cross winds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.7.

System protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.7.1.

Emergency Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.7.2.

Fire safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.7.2.1.

General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.7.2.2.

Functional and technical specification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.7.2.2.1. Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.7.2.2.2. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.7.2.2.3. Design rules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.7.2.2.4. Material requirement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.7.2.2.5. Maintenance of the fire protection measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.7.3.

Electrical protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.7.3.1.

General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.7.3.2.

Functional and technical specifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.7.3.2.1. Freight wagon bonding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.7.3.2.2. Freight wagon electrical equipment bonding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

55

55

55

55

55

55

56

56

56

57

57

57

57

57

57

57

57

57

58

58

58

58

58

60

60

60

60

60

60

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/9

4.2.7.4.

Fixing of tail lamps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.7.4.1.

General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.7.4.2.

Functional and technical specifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.7.4.2.1. Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.7.4.2.2. Position . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.7.5.

Provisions for the hydraulic/pneumatic equipment of freight wagons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.7.5.1.

General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.7.5.2.

Functional and technical specifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.8.

Maintenance: Maintenance file . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.8.1.

Definition, contents and criteria of the Maintenance File . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.8.1.1.1. Maintenance File . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.2.8.1.2. Management of the Maintenance File. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.3

FUNCTIONAL AND TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS OF THE INTERFACES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.3.1.

General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.3.2.

Control and command and signalling subsystem – . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.3.2.1.

Static axle load, dynamic wheel load and linear load (section 4.2.3.2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.3.2.2.

Wheels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.3.2.3.

Rolling stock parameters which influence ground based train monitoring systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.3.2.4.

Braking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.3.2.4.1.

Braking performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.3.3.

Traffic operation and management subsystem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.3.3.1.

Interface between vehicles, between sets of vehicles and between trains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.3.3.2.

Doors closing and locking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.3.3.3.

Securing of freight . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.3.3.4.

Marking of freight wagons. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.3.3.5.

Dangerous goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.3.3.6.

Longitudinal compressive forces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.3.3.7.

Braking performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.3.3.8.

Communication . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

61

61

61

61

61

61

61

61

61

62

62

64

65

65

66

66

66

67

67

67

67

67

67

67

67

67

67

68

68

L 344/10

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

4.3.3.8.1.

Vehicle Capability to transmit information between ground and vehicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

68

4.3.3.9.

Environmental Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.3.3.10.

Aerodynamic effects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.3.3.11.

Cross winds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.3.3.12.

Emergency Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.3.3.13.

Fire Safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

68

68

68

68

69

4.3.4.

Telematics applications for freight services subsystem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

69

4.3.5.

Infrastructure subsystem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.3.5.1.

Interface between vehicles, between sets of vehicles and between trains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.3.5.2.

Strength of Main Vehicle Structure and Securing of Freight . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.3.5.3.

Kinematic gauge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.3.5.4.

Static axle load, dynamic wheel load and linear load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.3.5.5.

Vehicle dynamic behaviour . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.3.5.6.

Longitudinal compressive forces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.3.5.7.

Environmental Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.3.5.8.

Fire protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.3.6.

Energy subsystem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

69

69

69

69

69

69

69

69

69

69

4.3.7.

The Council Directive 96/49/EC and its Annex (RID). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

69

4.3.7.1.

Dangerous goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.3.8.

Conventional Rail Noise TSI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.4.

4.5.

4.6.

4.7.

4.8.

OPERATING RULES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

MAINTENANCE RULES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

HEALTH AND SAFETY CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

INFRASTRUCTURE AND ROLLING STOCK REGISTERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.8.1.

Infrastructure Register . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.8.2.

Rolling Stock Register . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.

5.1.

Interoperability constituents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

DEFINITION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

69

69

69

70

70

70

71

71

71

71

71

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/11

5.2.

5.3.

INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

LIST OF CONSTITUENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.3.1.

Structures and mechanical parts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.3.1.1.

Buffers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.3.1.2.

Draw gear . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.3.1.3.

Decals for Markings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.3.2.

Vehicle track interaction and gauging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.3.2.1.

Bogie and Running Gear . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.3.2.2.

Wheelsets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.3.2.3.

Wheels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.3.2.4.

Axles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.3.3.

Braking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.3.3.1.

Distributor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.3.3.2.

Relay valve for variable load/Automatic empty-load change over brake . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.3.3.3.

Wheel slide protection device . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.3.3.4.

Slack adjuster . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.3.3.5.

Brake cylinder/actuator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.3.3.6.

Pneumatic half coupling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.3.3.7.

End Cock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.3.3.8.

Isolating device for distributor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.3.3.9.

Brake pad . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.3.3.10.

Brake blocks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.3.3.11.

Brake Pipe Emptying Accelerator valve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.3.3.12.

Automatic load sensing & empty/load changeover device . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.3.4.

Communication . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.3.5.

Environmental conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.3.6.

System protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.4.

CONSTITUENTS PERFORMANCES AND SPECIFICATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.4.1.

Structures and mechanical parts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

71

72

72

72

72

72

72

72

72

72

72

72

72

72

72

72

72

72

72

72

72

72

72

72

72

72

72

72

72

L 344/12

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

5.4.1.1.

Buffers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.4.1.2.

Draw Gear . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.4.1.3.

Decals for Markings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.4.2.

Vehicle track interaction and gauging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.4.2.1.

Bogie and Running Gear . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.4.2.2.

Wheelsets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.4.2.3.

Wheels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.4.2.4.

Axles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.4.3.

Braking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.4.3.1.

Constituents approved at the time of publication of this TSI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.4.3.2.

Distributor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.4.3.3.

Relay valve for variable load/Automatic empty-load change over brake . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.4.3.4.

Wheel slide protection device . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.4.3.5.

Slack adjuster . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.4.3.6.

Brake cylinder/actuator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.4.3.7.

Pneumatic half coupling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.4.3.8.

End Cock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.4.3.9.

Isolating device for distributor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.4.3.10.

Brake pad . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.4.3.11.

Brake blocks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.4.3.12.

Brake Pipe Emptying Accelerator valve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.4.3.13.

Automatic load sensing & empty/load changeover device . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.

Assessment of conformity and/or suitability for use of the constituents and verification of the
subsystem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.1.

INTEROPERABILITY CONSTITUENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.1.1.

Assessment procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.1.2.

Modules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.1.2.1.

General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.1.2.2.

Existing solutions for Interoperability Constituents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

72

73

73

73

73

74

74

74

74

74

74

74

74

75

75

75

75

75

75

75

75

75

75

75

75

76

76

76

6.1.2.3.

Innovative solutions for Interoperability Constituents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

77

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/13

6.1.2.4.

Assessment of suitability for use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.1.3.

Specification for assessment of ICs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.1.3.1.

Structures and mechanical parts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.1.3.1.1.

Buffers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.1.3.1.2.

Draw Gear . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.1.3.1.3. Marking of Freight Wagons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.1.3.2.

Vehicle track interaction and gauging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.1.3.2.1.

Bogie and Running Gear . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.1.3.2.2. Wheelsets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.1.3.2.3. Wheels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.1.3.2.4.

Axle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.1.3.3.

Braking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.2.

SUBSYSTEM CONVENTIONAL RAIL ROLLING STOCK FREIGHT WAGONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.2.1.

Assessment procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.2.2.

Modules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.2.2.1.

General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.2.2.2.

Innovative solutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.2.2.3.

Assessment of Maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

77

77

77

77

77

77

77

77

78

79

79

79

79

79

79

79

80

80

6.2.3.

Specifications for assessment of the subsystem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

80

6.2.3.1.

Structures and Mechanical Parts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.2.3.1.1.

Strength of main vehicle structure and Securing of Freight . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.2.3.2.

Vehicle track interaction and gauging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.2.3.2.1.

Vehicle dynamic behaviour . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.2.3.2.1.1. Application of the partial type approval procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.2.3.2.1.2. Certification of new wagons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.2.3.2.1.3. Exemptions from dynamic behaviour test for wagons to built or converted to run up to 100 km/h or
120 km/h . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.2.3.2.2.

Longitudinal compressive forces for freight wagons with side buffers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.2.3.2.3. Measuring the freight wagons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

80

80

80

80

80

81

81

81

81

6.2.3.3.

Braking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

82

L 344/14

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

6.2.3.3.1.

Braking performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.2.3.3.2. Minimum Brake System Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.2.3.4.

Environmental conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.2.3.4.1.

Temperature and other environmental conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.2.3.4.1.1. Temperature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.2.3.4.1.2. Other environmental conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.2.3.4.2. Aerodynamic effects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.2.3.4.3.

Cross winds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7.

7.1.

7.2.

7.3.

7.4.

Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

GENERAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

TSI REVISION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

APPLICATION OF THIS TSI TO NEW ROLLING STOCK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

EXISTING ROLLING STOCK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7.4.1.

Application of this TSI to existing rolling stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7.4.2.

Upgrading and renewal of existing freight wagons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7.4.3.

Additional requirements for wagon marking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7.5.

WAGONS OPERATING UNDER NATIONAL, BILATERAL, MULTILATERAL OR INTERNATIONAL
AGREEMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

82

82

84

84

84

84

85

85

85

85

85

85

85

85

86

86

86

7.5.1.

Existing agreements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

86

7.5.2.

Future agreements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7.6.

7.7.

PLACING IN SERVICE OF WAGONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

SPECIFIC CASES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7.7.1.

Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7.7.2.

List of specific cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7.7.2.1.

Structures and mechanical parts:

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7.7.2.1.1.

Interface (e. g. Coupling) between vehicles, between set of vehicles and between trains . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7.7.2.1.1.1. Track gauge 1 524 mm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7.7.2.1.1.2. Track gauge 1 520 mm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7.7.2.1.1.3. Track gauge 1 520 mm/1 524 mm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7.7.2.1.1.4. Track gauge 1 520 mm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

87

87

87

87

87

88

88

88

88

91

91

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/15

7.7.2.1.1.5. Track gauge 1 668 mm — Distance between buffers centrelines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7.7.2.1.1.6.

Interface between vehicles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7.7.2.1.1.7. General specific case on the network of 1 000 mm or less . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

91

91

91

7.7.2.1.2.

Safe access and egress for rolling stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

92

7.7.2.1.2.1. Safe access and egress for rolling stock Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

92

7.7.2.1.3.

Strength of main vehicle structure and securing of freight

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

92

7.7.2.1.3.1. 1 520 mm gauge lines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

92

7.7.2.1.3.2. 1 668 mm gauge lines — Lifting and jacking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

94

7.7.2.2.

Vehicle track interaction and gauging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7.7.2.2.1.

Kinematic gauge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7.7.2.2.1.1. Kinematic gauge Great Britain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

95

95

95

7.7.2.2.1.2. 1 520 mm and 1 435 mm track gauge wagons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

95

7.7.2.2.1.3. Kinematic gauge Finland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7.7.2.2.1.4. Kinematic gauge Spain and Portugal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7.7.2.2.1.5. Kinematic gauge Ireland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7.7.2.2.2.

Static axle load, dynamic wheel load and linear load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7.7.2.2.2.1. Static axle load, dynamic wheel load and linear load Finland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7.7.2.2.2.2. Static axle load, dynamic wheel load and linear load Great Britain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

95

95

96

96

96

96

7.7.2.2.2.3. Static axle load, dynamic wheel load and linear load Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

96

7.7.2.2.2.4. Static axle load, dynamic wheel load and linear load Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland . . . . .

96

7.7.2.2.3.

Rolling stock parameters which influence ground based train monitoring systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7.7.2.2.4.

Vehicle dynamic behaviour . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7.7.2.2.4.1. List of specific cases of wheel diameter related to various track gauges. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7.7.2.2.4.2. Material for wheels:

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7.7.2.2.4.3. Specific loads cases:

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7.7.2.2.4.4. Vehicle dynamic behaviour Spain and Portugal

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

97

97

97

97

97

97

7.7.2.2.4.5. Vehicle dynamic behaviour Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

98

7.7.2.2.5.

Longitudinal compressive forces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

98

L 344/16

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

7.7.2.2.5.1. Longitudinal compressive forces Poland and Slovakia in selected 1 520 mm lines, Lithuania, Latvia and
Estonia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7.7.2.2.6.

Bogie and Running Gear . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7.7.2.2.6.1. Bogie and Running Gear Poland and Slovakia in selected 1 520 mm lines, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia

7.7.2.2.6.2. Bogie and Running Gear Spain and Portugal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

98

98

98

99

7.7.2.3.

Braking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

100

7.7.2.3.1.

Braking performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

100

7.7.2.3.1.1. Braking performance Great Britain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

100

7.7.2.3.1.2. Braking performance Poland and Slovakia in selected 1 520 mm lines, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia . . .

100

7.7.2.3.1.3. Braking performance Finland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

102

7.7.2.3.1.4. Braking performance Spain and Portugal

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

102

7.7.2.3.1.5. Braking performance Finland, Sweden, Norway, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

102

7.7.2.3.1.6. Braking performance Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

102

7.7.2.3.2.

Parking brake . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

103

7.7.2.3.2.1. Parking brake Great Britain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

103

7.7.2.3.2.2. Parking brake Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

103

7.7.2.4.

Environmental conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

103

7.7.2.4.1.

Environmental conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

103

7.7.2.4.1.1. Environmental conditions Spain and Portugal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

103

7.7.2.4.2.

Fire safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

103

7.7.2.4.2.1. Fire safety Spain and Portugal

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

103

7.7.2.4.3.

Electrical protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

104

7.7.2.4.3.1. Electrical protection Poland and Slovakia in selected 1 520 mm lines, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia . . . .

104

7.7.3.

Table of specific cases arranged by Member State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

104

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/17

Table of content: Annexes

Reference

Title

Structures and mechanical parts

Structures and mechanical parts, Marking of freight wagons

Vehicle track interaction and gauging, Kinematic gauge

Vehicle track interaction and gauging, Static axle load, dynamic wheel load and linear load

Vehicle track interaction and gauging, Wheelset dimensions and tolerances for standard gauge

Communication, Vehicle capability to transmit information between ground and vehicle

Environmental conditions, Humidity

Infrastructure and Rolling stock register, Requirements for the freight wagons register

Braking, Interfaces of braking interoperability constituents

Vehicle track interaction and gauging, Bogie and running gear

Vehicle track interaction and gauging, Wheelset

Vehicle track interaction and gauging, Wheels

Vehicle track interaction and gauging, Axle

Structures and mechanical parts, Permissible stresses for static test methods

Environmental conditions, TRIV requirements

Braking performance, assessment of interoperability constituents

Assessment procedures, Interoperability Constituents

Vehicle track interaction and gauging, Longitudinal forces

Braking, Braking performance

Specific cases, Kinematic gauge, Great Britain

Specific cases, Kinematic gauge, 1 520 mm track gauge

Specific cases, Braking performance, Great Britain

Specific cases, Kinematic gauge, Finland, static gauge FIN1

Specific cases, Member States Spain and Portugal

Constituents, Bogies and Running Gear

Structures and mechanical parts, Impact (Buffing) Test

Assessment procedures, Verification of Subsystems

Structures and mechanical parts, Fixing of tail lamps

Structures and mechanical parts, Sources of fatigue loading

Assessment of Maintenance Arrangements

Structures and mechanical parts, Footsteps and handrails

Braking, List of approved brake components

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

N

O

P

Q

R

S

T

U

V

W

X

Y

Z

AA

BB

CC

DD

EE

FF

L 344/18

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Reference

Title

Specific Cases, Irish loading gauges

Specific Cases, Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland Interface between vehicles

Assessment Procedure: Limits for modifications of freight wagons not requiring new approval

Open Points

Infrastructure and Rolling Stock Register: Infrastructure Register

Structures and mechanical parts, Strength requirements for certain types of wagon components

Structures and mechanical parts, Permissible Stress Based on Elongation Criteria

GG

HH

II

JJ

KK

YY

ZZ

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/19

TRANS-EUROPEAN CONVENTIONAL RAIL SYSTEM

Technical Specification for Interoperability Subsystem Rolling Stock Scope Freight Wagons

1.

1.1.

INTRODUCTION

TECHNICAL SCOPE

This TSI concerns the rolling stock subsystem as listed in point 1 of Annex II to Directive 2001/16/EC.

Further information on the rolling stock subsystem is provided in Section 2.

This TSI covers freight wagons only.

1.2.

GEOGRAPHICAL SCOPE

The geographical scope of this TSI is the trans-European conventional rail system as described in Annex I to
Directive 2001/16/EEC.

1.3.

CONTENT OF THIS TSI

In accordance with Article 5(3) of Directive 2001/16/EC, this TSI:

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

indicates its intended scope (part of the network or rolling stock referred to in Annex I to the Directive;
subsystem or part of subsystem referred to in Annex II to the Directive) — Section 2;

lays down essential requirements for each subsystem concerned and its interfaces vis-à-vis other
subsystems — Section 3;

establishes the functional and technical specifications to be met by the subsystem and its interfaces vis-à-
vis other subsystems. If necessary, these specifications may vary according to the use of the subsystem,
for example according to the categories of line, hub and/or rolling stock provided for in Annex I to the
Directive — Section 4;

determines the interoperability constituents and interfaces covered by European specifications, including
European standards, which are necessary to achieve interoperability within the trans-European
conventional rail system — Section 5;

states, in each case under consideration, the procedures for the assessment of conformity or suitability for
use. This includes in particular the modules defined in Decision 93/465/EEC or, where appropriate, the
specific procedures to be used to assess either the conformity or the suitability for use of interoperability
constituents and ‘EC’ verification of subsystems — Section 6;

indicates the strategy for implementing the TSI. In particular, it is necessary to specify the stages to be
completed in order to make a gradual transition from the existing situation to the final situation in which
compliance with the TSI shall be the norm — Section 7;

indicates, for the staff concerned, the professional qualifications and health and safety conditions at work
required for
the
implementation of the TSI — Section 4.

the subsystem concerned, as well as for

the operation and maintenance of

Moreover, in accordance with Article 5(5), provision may be made for specific cases for each TSI; these are
indicated in Section 7.

Lastly, this TSI also comprises, in Section 4, the operating and maintenance rules specific to the scope indicated
in paragraphs 1.1 and 1.2 above.

2.

2.1.

DEFINITION OF SUBSYSTEM/SCOPE

DEFINITION OF SUBSYSTEM

The rolling stock, which is the subject of this TSI, comprises the freight wagons likely to travel on all or part of
the trans-European conventional rail network. The freight wagons include rolling stock designed to carry
lorries.

L 344/20

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

This TSI applies to new, upgraded or renewed freight wagons placed in service after entering this TSI into force.

This TSI does not apply to wagons being subject to a contract already signed before the date of entry into force
of this TSI.

The section 7.3., 7.4 and 7.5 describe in which conditions and with which exceptions the TSI requirements shall
be met.

The rolling stock freight wagons subsystem includes the structure of the vehicles, braking equipment, coupling
and running gear (bogies, axles etc.) suspension, doors and communication systems.

The procedures for maintenance work allowing the mandatory corrective and preventive maintenance to assure
safe operation and the performance required are also included in this TSI. They are specified in Section 4.2.8.

Requirements relating to the noise generated by freight wagons are excluded from this TSI, except maintenance
issue, as there is a separate TSI dealing with the noise generated by freight wagons, locomotives, multiple units
and coaches.

2.2.

FUNCTIONS OF SUBSYSTEM

The freight wagons shall contribute to the following functions:

‘Load freight’ — the freight wagons provide the means to operate and carry the load safely.

‘Move rolling stock’ — the freight wagons are able to be moved safely on the network and contribute to the
braking of the train.

‘Maintain and provide data on rolling stock, infrastructure and timetable’ –Specification of the maintenance file
and certification of the maintenance establishments allow the control of the freight wagon maintenance. Data
relating to the freight wagons is provided in the rolling stock register, marked on the wagons, and eventually by
means of vehicle to vehicle and vehicle to ground communication devices.

‘Operate a train’ — the freight wagon shall be able to be operated safely under all expected environmental
conditions and in certain expected situations.

‘Provide services for freight customers’ — Data relating to the freight wagon to support freight services for
customers is provided in the rolling stock register, marked on the wagons and eventually by means of vehicle to
ground communication devices.

2.3.

INTERFACES OF SUBSYSTEM

The rolling stock freight wagons subsystem experiences the following interfaces to:

Control and command and signalling subsystem -

— Rolling stock parameters which influence ground based train monitoring systems

— Hot axle bearing detectors

— Electrical detection of the wheelset

— Axle counters

— Braking performance

Traffic operation and management subsystem

— Interface between vehicles, between sets of vehicles and between trains

— Doors closing and locking

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/21

— Securing of freight

— Loading rules

— Dangerous goods

— Longitudinal compressive forces

— Braking performance

— Aerodynamic effects

— Maintenance

Telematics applications for freight service subsystem

— Rolling stock reference data bases

— Wagon and intermodal unit operational database

Infrastructure subsystem

— Interface between vehicles, between sets of vehicles and between trains

— Buffers

— Kinematic gauge

— Static axle load, dynamic wheel load and linear load

— Vehicle dynamic behaviour

— Braking performance

— Fire protection

Energy subsystem

— Electrical protection

Noise Aspect

— Maintenance

The Council Directive 96/49/EC and its Annex (RID).

— Dangerous goods

3.

3.1.

ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS

GENERAL

In the scope of the present TSI compliance with the specifications described:

— in section 4 for the subsystem

— and in section 5 for the interoperability constituents,

as demonstrated by a positive result of the assessment of:

— conformity and/or suitability for use of the interoperability constituents,

— and of verification of the subsystem, as described in section 6.

ensures fulfilment of the relevant essential requirements quoted in section 3 of this TSI.

L 344/22

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Nevertheless, if part of the essential requirements are covered by national rules because of:

— open and reserved points declared in the TSI,

— derogation under article 7 of the Directive 2001/16/EC,

— specific cases described in section 7.7 of the present TSI,

the corresponding conformity assessment shall be carried out according to procedures under the responsibility
of the Member State concerned.

Under Article 4(1) of Directive 2001/16/EC, the trans-European conventional rail system, subsystems and
interoperability constituents including interfaces shall meet the relevant essential requirements set out in
Annex III to the Directive 2001/16/EC.

3.2.

THE ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS RELATE TO:

— Safety

— Reliability and availability

— Health

— Environmental protection

— Technical compatibility.

These requirements include general requirements, and requirements specific to each subsystem.

3.3.

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

3.3.1.

SAFETY

Essential Requirement 1.1.1 of Annex III to Directive 2001/16/EC.

The design, construction or assembly, maintenance and monitoring of safety-critical components and, more
particularly, of the components involved in train movements must be such as to guarantee safety at the level
corresponding to the aims laid down for the network, including those for specific degraded situations.

This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in sections:

— 4.2.2.1 (interface between vehicles)

— 4.2.2.2 (safe access and egress)

— 4.2.2.3 (strength of main vehicle structure)

— 4.2.2.5 (marking of freight wagons)

— 4.2.3.4 (vehicle dynamic behaviour)

— 4.2.3.5 (longitudinal compressive forces)

— 4.2.4 (braking)

— 4.2.6 (environmental conditions)

— 4.2.7 (system protection), except 4.2.7.3 (electrical protection)

— 4.2.8 (maintenance)

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/23

Essential Requirement 1.1.2:

The parameters involved in the wheel/rail contact must meet the stability requirements needed in order to
guarantee safe movement at the maximum authorised speed.

This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in sections:

— 4.2.3.2 (axle and wheel loading)

— 4.2.3.4 (vehicle dynamic behaviour)

— 4.2.3.5 (longitudinal compressive forces)

Essential requirement 1.1.3 of Annex III to Directive 2001/16/EC.

The components used must withstand any normal or exceptional stresses that have been specified during their
period in service. The safety repercussions of any accidental failures must be limited by appropriate means.

This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in sections:

— 4.2.2.1 (interface between vehicles)

— 4.2.2.2 (safe access and egress for rolling stock)

— 4.2.2.3 (strength of main vehicle structure)

— 4.2.2.4 (doors closing)

— 4.2.2.6 (dangerous goods)

— 4.2.3.3.2 (hot axle box detection)

— 4.2.4 (braking)

— 4.2.6 (environmental conditions)

— 4.2.8 (maintenance)

Essential Requirement 1.1.4 of Annex III to Directive 2001/16/EC.

The design of fixed installations and rolling stock and the choice of the materials used must be aimed at
limiting the generation, propagation and effects of fire and smoke in the event of a fire.

This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in sections

— 4.2.7.2 (fire safety)

Essential Requirement 1.1.5 of Annex III to Directive 2001/16/EC.

Any devices intended to be handled by users must be so designed as not to impair the safe operation of the
devices or the health and safety of users if used foreseeably in a manner not in accordance with the posted
instructions.

This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in sections:

— 4.2.2.1 (interface between vehicles)

— 4.2.2.2 (safe access and egress for rolling stock)

L 344/24

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

— 4.2.2.4 (doors closing)

— 4.2.4 (braking)

3.3.2.

RELIABILITY AND AVAILABILITY

Essential Requirement 1.2 of Annex III to Directive 2001/16/EC.

The monitoring and maintenance of fixed or movable components that are involved in train movements must
be organised, carried out and quantified in such a manner as to maintain their operation under the intended
conditions.

This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in sections:

— 4.2.2.1 (interface between vehicles)

— 4.2.2.2 (safe access and egress for rolling stock)

— 4.2.2.3 (strength of main vehicle structure)

— 4.2.2.4 (doors closing)

— 4.2.2.5 (wagon markings)

— 4.2.2.6 (dangerous goods)

— 4.2.4.1 (braking system)

— 4.2.7.2.2.5 (maintenance of the fire protection measures)

— 4.2.8 (maintenance)

3.3.3.

HEALTH

Essential Requirement 1.3.1 of Annex III to Directive 2001/16/EC.

Materials likely, by virtue of the way they are used, to constitute a health hazard to those having access to them
must not be used in trains and railway infrastructure.

This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in sections:

— 4.2.8 (maintenance)

Essential Requirement 1.3.2 of Annex III to Directive 2001/16/EC.:

Those materials must be selected, deployed and used in such a way as to restrict the emission of harmful and
dangerous fumes or gases, particularly in the event of fire.

This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in sections:

— 4.2.7.2 (fire safety)

— 4.2.8 (maintenance)

3.3.4.

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

Essential Requirement 1.4.1 of Annex III to Directive 2001/16/EC.

The environmental impact of establishment and operation of the trans-European conventional rail system must
be assessed and taken into account at the design stage of the system in accordance with the Community
provisions in force.

This essential requirement is not relevant within the scope of this TSI.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/25

Essential Requirement 1.4.2 of Annex III to Directive 2001/16/EC.

The materials used in the trains and infrastructure must prevent the emission of fumes or gases which are
harmful and dangerous to the environment, particularly in the event of fire.

This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in sections:

— 4.2.7.2 (fire safety)

— 4.2.8 (maintenance)

Essential Requirement 1.4.3 of Annex III to Directive 2001/16/EC.

The rolling stock and energy-supply systems must be designed and manufactured in such a way as to be
electromagnetically compatible with the installations, equipment and public or private networks with which
they might interfere.

This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in sections:

— 4.2.3.3 (communication between vehicle and ground)

Essential Requirement 1.4.4 of Annex III to Directive 2001/16/EC.

Operation of the trans-European conventional rail system must respect existing regulations on noise pollution.

This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in sections:

— 4.2.8 (maintenance)

— 4.2.3.4 (vehicle dynamic behaviour)

Essential Requirement 1.4.5 of Annex III to Directive 2001/16/EC.:

Operation of the trans-European conventional rail system must not give rise to an inadmissible level of ground
vibrations for the activities and areas close to the infrastructure and in a normal state of maintenance.

This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in sections:

— 4.2.3.2 (static axle load, dynamic wheel load and linear load)

— 4.2.3.4 (vehicle dynamic behaviour)

— 4.2.8 (maintenance)

3.3.5.

TECHNICAL COMPATIBILITY

Essential Requirement 1.5 of Annex III to Directive 2001/16/EC.

The technical characteristics of the infrastructure and fixed installations must be compatible with each other and with those
of the trains to be used on the trans-European conventional rail system.

If compliance with these characteristics proves difficult on certain sections of the network, temporary solutions,
which ensure compatibility in the future, may be implemented.

This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in sections:

— 4.2.3.1 (kinematic gauge)

— 4.2.3.2 (static axle load, dynamic wheel load and linear load)

L 344/26

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

— 4.2.3.4 (vehicle dynamic behaviour)

— 4.2.3.5 (longitudinal compressive forces)

— 4.2.4 (braking)

— 4.2.8 (maintenance)

3.4.

REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIC TO THE ROLLING STOCK SUBSYSTEM

3.4.1.

SAFETY

Essential Requirement 2.4.1 of Annex III to Directive 2001/16/EC.

The structure of the rolling stock and of the links between vehicles must be designed in such a way as to protect
the passenger and driving compartments in the event of collision or derailment.

This essential requirement is not relevant within the scope of this TSI.

The electrical equipment must not impair the safety and functioning of the control and command and
signalling installations.

This essential requirement is not relevant within the scope of this TSI.

The braking techniques and the stresses exerted must be compatible with the design of the track, engineering
structures and signalling systems.

This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in sections:

— 4.2.3.5 (longitudinal compressive forces)

— 4.2.4 (braking)

Steps must be taken to prevent access to electrically-live constituents in order not to endanger the safety of
persons.

This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in sections:

— 4.2.2.5 (marking of freight wagons)

— 4.2.7.3 (electrical protection)

— 4.2.8 (maintenance)

In the event of danger, devices must enable passengers to inform the driver and accompanying staff to contact
him.

This essential requirement is not relevant within the scope of this TSI.

The access doors must incorporate an opening and closing system, which guarantees passenger safety.

This essential requirement is not relevant within the scope of this TSI.

Emergency exits must be provided and indicated.

This essential requirement is not relevant within the scope of this TSI.

Appropriate provisions must be laid down to take account of the particular safety conditions in very long
tunnels.

This essential requirement is not relevant within the scope of this TSI.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/27

An emergency lighting system of sufficient intensity and duration is compulsory on board trains.

This essential requirement is not relevant within the scope of this TSI.

Trains must be equipped with a public address system which provides a means of communication to the public
from on-board staff and ground control.

This essential requirement is not relevant within the scope of this TSI.

3.4.2.

RELIABILITY AND AVAILABILITY

Essential Requirement 2.4.2 of Annex III to Directive 2001/16/EC.

The design of the vital equipment, of the running, traction and braking equipment and of the control and
command system must be such as to enable the train to continue its mission, in a specific degraded situation,
without adverse consequences for the equipment remaining in service.

This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in sections:

— 4.2.4.1.2.6 (wheel-slide-protection, see also section 5.3.3.3 and Annex I)

— 5.4.1.2 (Draw gear)

— 5.4.2.1 (Bogie and running gear)

— 5.4.2.2 (wheelsets)

— 5.4.3.8 (Isolating device for distributor)

3.4.3.

TECHNICAL COMPATIBILITY

Essential Requirement 2.4.3 of Annex III to Directive 2001/16/EC.:

The electrical equipment must be compatible with the operation of the control and command and signalling
installations.

This essential requirement is not relevant within in the scope of this TSI.

In the case of electric traction, the characteristics of the current-collection devices must be such as to enable
trains to travel under the energy-supply systems for the trans-European conventional rail system.

This essential requirement is not relevant within the scope of this TSI.

The characteristics of the rolling stock must be such as to allow it to travel on any line on which it is expected
to operate.

This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in sections:

— 4.2.2.3 (strength of main vehicle structure)

— 4.2.3.1 (kinematic gauge)

— 4.2.3.2 (static axle load, dynamic wheel load and linear load)

— 4.2.3.3 (rolling stock parameters which influence ground based train monitoring -systems)

— 4.2.3.4 (vehicle dynamic behaviour)

— 4.2.3.5 (longitudinal compressive forces)

— 4.2.4 (braking)

— 4.2.6 (environmental conditions)

L 344/28

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

— 4.2.8 (maintenance)

— 4.8.2 (rolling stock register)

3.5.

REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIC TO MAINTENANCE

3.5.1.

HEALTH AND SAFETY

Essential Requirement 2.5.1 of Annex III to Directive 2001/16/EC.

The technical installations and the procedures used in the centres must ensure the safe operation of the
subsystem and not constitute a danger to health and safety.

This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in sections:

— 4.2.8 (maintenance)

3.5.2.

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

Essential Requirement 2.5.2 of Annex III to Directive 2001/16/EC.

The technical installations and the procedures used in the maintenance centres must not exceed the permissible
levels of nuisance with regard to the surrounding environment.

This essential requirement is not satisfied by the functional and technical specifications within the scope of this
TSI.

3.5.3.

TECHNICAL COMPATIBILITY

Essential Requirement 2.5.3 of Annex III to Directive 2001/16/EC.

The maintenance installations for conventional rolling stock must be such as to enable safety, health and
comfort operations to be carried out on all stock for which they have been designed.

This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in sections:

— 4.2.8 (maintenance)

3.6.

REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIC TO OTHER SUBSYSTEMS CONCERNING ALSO THE ROLLING STOCK
SUBSYSTEM

3.6.1.

INFRASTRUCTURE SUBSYSTEM

3.6.1.1.

Safety

Essential Requirement 2.1.1 of Annex III to Directive 2001/16/EC.:

Appropriate steps must be taken to prevent access to or undesirable intrusions into installations.

Steps must be taken to limit the dangers to which persons are exposed, particularly when trains pass through
stations.

Infrastructure to which the public has access must be designed and made in such a way as to limit any human
safety hazards (stability, fire, access, evacuation, platforms, etc.).

Appropriate provisions must be laid down to take account of the particular safety conditions in very long
tunnels.

This essential requirement is not relevant within the scope of this TSI.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/29

3.6.2.

ENERGY SUBSYSTEM

3.6.2.1.

Safety

Essential Requirement 2.2.1 of Annex III to Directive 2001/16/EC.

Operation of the energy-supply systems must not impair the safety either of trains or of persons (users,
operating staff, trackside dwellers and third parties).

This essential requirement is not relevant within the scope of this TSI.

3.6.2.2.

Environmental protection

Essential Requirement 2.2.2 of Annex III to Directive 2001/16/EC.

The functioning of the electrical or thermal energy-supply systems must not interfere with the environment
beyond the specified limits.

This essential requirement is not relevant within the scope of this TSI.

3.6.2.3.

Technical compatibility

Essential Requirement 2.2.3 of Annex III to Directive 2001/16/EC.

The electricity/thermal energy supply systems used must:

— enable trains to achieve the specified performance levels;

— in the case of electricity energy supply systems, be compatible with the collection devices fitted to the

trains.

This essential requirement is not relevant within the scope of this TSI.

3.6.3.

CONTROL AND COMMAND AND SIGNALLING

3.6.3.1.

Safety

Essential Requirement 2.3.1 of Annex III to Directive 2001/16/EC.:

The control and command and signalling installations and procedures used must enable trains to travel with a
level of safety which corresponds to the objectives set for the network. The control and command and
signalling systems should continue to provide for safe passage of trains permitted to run under degraded
conditions.

This essential requirement is not relevant within the scope of this TSI.

3.6.3.2.

Technical compatibility

Essential Requirement 2.3.2 of Annex III to Directive 2001/16/EC.

All new infrastructure and all new rolling stock manufactured or developed after adoption of compatible
control and command and signalling systems must be tailored to use of those systems. The control and
command and signalling equipment installed in the train drivers' cabs must permit normal operation, under
the specified conditions, throughout the trans-European conventional rail system.

This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in sections:

— 4.2.3.3.1 (electrical resistance)

— 4.2.4 (braking)

L 344/30

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

3.6.4.

OPERATION AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT

3.6.4.1.

Safety

Essential Requirement 2.6.1 of Annex III to Directive 2001/16/EC.

Alignment of the network operating rules and the qualifications of drivers and on-board staff and of the staff in
the control centres must be such as to ensure safe operation, bearing in mind the different requirements of
cross-border and domestic services.

The maintenance operations and intervals, the training and qualifications of the maintenance and control
centre staff and the quality assurance system set up by the operators concerned in the control and maintenance
centres must be such as to ensure a high level of safety.

This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in sections:

— 4.2.2.5 (marking of freight wagons)

— 4.2.4 (braking)

— 4.2.8 (maintenance)

3.6.4.2.

Reliability and availability

Essential Requirement 2.6.2. of Annex III to Directive 2001/16/EC.

The maintenance operations and periods, the training and qualifications of the maintenance and control centre
staff and the quality assurance system set up by the operators concerned in the control and maintenance
centres must be such as to ensure a high level of system reliability and availability.

This essential requirement is satisfied by the functional and technical specifications in sections:

— 4.2.8 (maintenance)

3.6.4.3.

Technical compatibility

Essential Requirement 2.6.3 of Annex III to Directive 2001/16/EC.

Alignment of the network operating rules and the qualifications of drivers, on-board staff and traffic managers
must be such as to ensure operating efficiency on the trans-European conventional rail system, bearing in mind
the different requirements of cross-border and domestic services.

This essential requirement is not relevant within the scope of this TSI.

3.6.5.

TELEMATICS APPLICATIONS FOR FREIGHT AND PASSENGERS

3.6.5.1.

Technical compatibility

Essential Requirement 2.7.1 of Annex III to Directive 2001/16/EC.

The essential requirements for Telematics applications guarantee a minimum quality of service for passengers
and carriers of goods, particularly in terms of technical compatibility.

Steps must be taken to ensure:

— that the databases, software and data communication protocols are developed in a manner allowing
maximum data interchange between different applications and operators, excluding confidential
commercial data;

— easy access to the information for users.

This essential requirement is not relevant within the scope of this TSI.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/31

3.6.5.2.

Reliability and availability

Essential Requirement 2.7.2 of Annex III to Directive 2001/16/EC.

The methods of use, management, updating and maintenance of
communication protocols must guarantee the efficiency of these systems and the quality of the service.

these databases, software and data

This essential requirement is not relevant within the scope of this TSI.

3.6.5.3.

Health

Essential Requirement 2.7.3:

The interfaces between these systems and users must comply with the minimum rules on ergonomics and
health protection.

This essential requirement is not relevant within the scope of this TSI.

3.6.5.4.

Safety

Essential Requirement 2.7.4 of Annex III to Directive 2001/16/EC.

Suitable levels of integrity and dependability must be provided for the storage or transmission of safety-related
information.

This essential requirement is not relevant within the scope of this TSI.

4.

4.1.

CHARACTERISATION OF THE SUBSYSTEM

INTRODUCTION

The trans-European conventional rail system, to which Directive 2001/16/EC applies and of which the rolling
stock freight wagons subsystem is a part, is an integrated system whose compatibility shall be verified. This
compatibility shall be checked in particular with regard to the specifications of the subsystem, its interfaces vis-
à-vis the system in which it is integrated, as well as the operating and maintenance rules.

The functional and technical specifications of the subsystem and its interfaces, described in sections 4.2 and
4.3, do not impose the use of specific technologies or technical solutions, except where this is strictly necessary
innovative solutions for
for the interoperability of
the trans-European conventional rail network. But
interoperability may require new specifications and/or new assessment methods.
to allow
technological innovation, these specifications and assessment methods shall be developed by the process
described in sections 6.1.2.3 and 6.2.2.2.

In order

Taking account of all the applicable essential requirements, the rolling stock freight wagons subsystem is
characterised in the present section 4.

4.2.

FUNCTIONAL AND TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS OF THE SUBSYSTEM

4.2.1.

GENERAL

In light of the essential requirements in Section 3, the functional and technical specifications of the rolling
stock freight wagons subsystem are arranged as follows:

— Structures and mechanical parts

— Vehicle track interaction and gauging

— Braking

— Communication

— Environmental conditions

— System protection

L 344/32

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

— Maintenance

These headings include the basic parameters as follows:

Structures and mechanical parts

Interface (e. g. Coupling) between vehicles, between set of Vehicles and between trains

Safe access and egress for rolling stock

Strength of main vehicle structure

Securing of Freight

Doors closing and locking

Marking of freight wagons

Dangerous goods

Vehicle track interaction and gauging

Kinematic gauge

Static axle load, dynamic wheel load and linear load

Rolling stock parameters which influence ground based train monitoring systems

Vehicle dynamic behaviour

Longitudinal compressive forces

Braking

Braking performance

Communication

Vehicle capability to transmit information from vehicle to vehicle

Vehicle capability to transmit information between ground and vehicle

Environmental conditions

Environmental conditions

Aerodynamic effects

Cross winds

System protection

Emergency Measures

Fire safety

Electrical protection

Maintenance

Maintenance file

For each basic parameter a General paragraph introduces the following paragraphs.

These following paragraphs detail the conditions to be met in order to fulfil the requirements introduced in the
General paragraph.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/33

4.2.2.

STRUCTURES AND MECHANICAL PARTS:

4.2.2.1.

Interface (e. g. Coupling) between vehicles, between set of vehicles and between trains

4.2.2.1.1. General

Wagons shall have resilient buffing and draw gear at both ends.

Rakes of wagons, which are always operated as a unit when in service are considered to be a single wagon for
the application of this requirement. The interfaces between these wagons shall incorporate a resilient coupling
system, which is capable of withstanding the forces due to the intended operational conditions.

Trains, which are always operated as a unit in service, are considered to be a single wagon for the application of
this requirement. They also shall incorporate a resilient coupling system as above. If they do not have a
standard screw coupler and buffers they shall have the facility to fit an emergency coupler at both ends.

4.2.2.1.2.

Functional and technical specifications

4.2.2.1.2.1. Buffers

When buffers are fitted, two identical buffers shall be fitted at a wagon end. These buffers shall be of a
compressible type. The height of the centre line of the buffing gear shall be between 940 mm and 1 065 mm
above rail level in all conditions of loading.

The standard distance between buffer centrelines shall be nominally 1 750 mm symmetrically about the
centreline of the freight wagon.

Buffers shall be sized so that in horizontal curves and reverse curves, it is not possible for vehicles to lock
buffers. The minimum acceptable overlap shall be 50mm.

The Infrastructure TSI specifies the minimum curve radius and reverse curve characteristics.

Wagons fitted with buffers with a stroke in excess of 105 mm shall be fitted with four identical buffers (elastic
systems, stroke) exhibiting the same design characteristics.

If interchangeability of the buffers is required a free space on the headstock shall be provided for the supporting
plate. The buffer shall be fixed to the wagon headstock by means of four M24 locked fasteners of a quality class
which provides a yield strength of at least 640 N/mm2 (see Annex A fig. A1).

— Buffer characteristics

Buffers shall have a minimum stroke of 105 mm 0
least 30 kJ.

–5 mm and a dynamic energy absorption capacity of at

The buffer heads shall be convex with a radius of curvature of their spherical working surface of 2 750
mm ± 50 mm.

Minimum height of the buffer head shall be 340 mm equally spaced from the longitudinal buffer axis.

Buffers shall have an identification mark. The identification mark shall contain at least the buffer stroke in
‘mm’ and a value for the energy absorption capacity of the buffer.

4.2.2.1.2.2. Draw Gear

The standard draw gear between vehicles shall be non-continuous and comprises a screw coupling
permanently attached to the hook, a draw hook and a draw bar with an elastic system

The height of the centre line of the draw hook shall be between 920 mm and 1 045 mm above rail level in all
conditions of loading.

L 344/34

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Each wagon end shall have a facility for supporting a coupling when it is not in use. No part of the coupler
assembly shall reach below 140 mm above rail level when at its lowest position due to wear and suspension
travel.

— Draw gear characteristics:

The elastic system of the draw gear shall have as a minimum a static capacity of absorption of 8 kJ.

The draw hook and the draw bar shall withstand a force of 1 000 kN without breaking.

The screw coupler shall withstand a force of 850 kN without breaking. The breaking strength of the
screw coupler shall be lower than the breaking strength of other parts of the draw gear.

The screw coupler shall be designed such that in-train forces cannot cause the coupler to unscrew
involuntarily.

The maximum weight of the screw coupler shall not exceed 36 kg.

The dimensions of the screw couplers and draw hooks see Annex A fig A6 shall be as shown in Annex A
figures A2 and A3The coupler length measured from the inside face of the coupler bow to the draw-bar
pin centre-line shall be:

— 986 mm +10

-5 mm with completely screwed-out coupler

— 750 mm ± 10 mm with completely screwed-in coupler

4.2.2.1.2.3.

Interaction of draw- and buffing-gear

The characteristics of the buffers and draw gear shall be designed in order to enable the safe transit of curves in
the track with a radius of 150 m.

Two wagons with bogies coupled on straight track with touching buffers shall generate compressive forces no
higher than 250 kN on a 150 m radius curve.

There is no requirement specified for two axle wagons.

— Draw gear and buffing gear characteristics

The distance between the front edge of a draw-hook opening and the front side of the fully extended
buffers shall be 355 mm + 45/-20 mm in the new condition as shown in Annex A fig. A4.

4.2.2.2.

Safe access and egress for rolling stock

Vehicles shall be designed so that staff are not exposed to undue risk during coupling and uncoupling. If screw
couplers and side buffers are used, the required spaces shown in Annex A fig. A5 shall be free of fixed parts.
Connecting cables and flexible hoses may be inside this space. There shall be no devices under the buffers that
hinder the access to the space.

The clearance above the draw hook is viewed in Annex A fig. A7.

If a combined automatic and screw coupler is fitted it is permissible for the auto coupler head to infringe the
Berne rectangle on the left hand side (as viewed Annex A fig. A5) when it is stowed and the screw coupler is in
use.

There shall be a handrail under each buffer. The handrails shall withstand the loads, which are applied by the
shunters while accessing the space between the buffers.

At the ends of a wagon there shall be no fixed parts within 40 mm of a vertical plane placed at the end of the
fully compressed buffers.

Except for wagons used only in fixed formation trains, there shall be at least one step and one handrail for
shunters at each side of the vehicle. There shall be sufficient space above and around the steps that the safety of

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/35

the shunter is ensured. Steps and handrails shall be designed to withstand the loads that are applied by the
shunter. Steps shall be at least 150 mm from a vertical plane at the end of the fully compressed buffers (see
Annex A figure A5). Steps and areas, which provide access for operation, loading and unloading, shall be slip
resistant (see Annex EE).

At each end of a wagon that may form the end of a train, there shall be devices for mounting a taillight. Steps
and handrails shall be provided where necessary to enable easy access.

The handrails and footsteps shall be inspected at normal maintenance periods and remedial action taken if
signs of significant damage, cracking or corrosion are found.

4.2.2.3.

Strength of Main Vehicle Structure and Securing of Freight

4.2.2.3.1. General

The structural design of wagon shall be carried out in accordance with the requirements of Section 3 of
EN12663 and the structure shall meet the criteria defined in Clauses 3.4 to 3.6 of this standard .

In addition to the criteria already identified, it is permissible to take the material elongation at failure into
account in the selection of the safety factor defined in clause 3.4.3 of EN12663. Annex ZZ defines how the
safety factor and permissible stress shall be determined.

When performing fatigue life assessments it is important to ensure that the load cases are representative of the
intended application and expressed in a manner consistent with the adopted design code. Any relevant
guidelines on the interpretation of the selected design code shall be followed.

The permissible stresses for the materials used in the construction of wagons shall be determined as specified in
Section 5 of EN12663.

The wagon structure shall be inspected at normal maintenance periods and remedial action taken if signs of
significant damage, cracking or corrosion are found.

This section defines the minimum structural requirements for the main load carrying (primary) structure of the
wagons and the interfaces with equipment and payload.

These requirements cover:

— Exceptional loads:

— Longitudinal design loads

— Maximum vertical load

— Load combinations

— Lifting and jacking

— Equipment attachment (including body/bogie)

— Other exceptional loads

— Service (fatigue) loads:

— Sources of load input

— Payload spectrum

— Track induced loading

— Traction and braking

L 344/36

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

— Aerodynamic loading

— Fatigue loads at interfaces

— Body/bogie connection

— Equipment attachment

— Coupler loads

— Combinations of fatigue loads

— Stiffness of the main vehicle structure

— Deflection

— Mode of vibration

— Torsional stiffness

— Equipment

— Securing of freight

Measures shall be taken to ensure that the load or parts of the load do not leave the freight wagon
accidentally.

Requirements for fastening systems or devices such as spigots or securing rings are not mandatory in this TSI

4.2.2.3.2.

Exceptional Loads

4.2.2.3.2.1. Longitudinal Design Loads

Different values will apply for different kinds of freight wagons as identified in EN12663 namely:

F-I:
Wagons that may be shunted without restriction;
F-II: Wagons excluded from hump or loose shunting.

The basic structural design requirements assume that wagons in the above categories are fitted with buffers and
couplers appropriate to the operations.

The structure shall conform to the requirements of Clause 3.4 of EN12663 when subject to all exceptional load
cases.

The wagon bodies shall meet the longitudinal strength requirements as specified in tables 1, 2, 3, and 4 of
EN12663 as appropriate, where the load paths exist.

NOTE 1:

NOTE 2:

NOTE 3:

A force applied to one end of the wagon body shall be reacted at the corresponding position
at the opposite end.
Forces shall be applied horizontally to the mounting structure, divided equally on the axis of
each side buffer location or on the axis of the coupler.
If a buffing test (see Annex Z)
is not to be performed, calculations shall be used to
demonstrate that the wagon structure is capable of sustaining the maximum buffing loads it is
expected to experience in service.

4.2.2.3.2.2. Maximum Vertical Load

The wagon body shall meet the requirements of table 8 of EN12663 modified as indicated in Note 1 below.

The wagon body shall also be designed to carry the anticipated maximum loads due to the method of loading
and unloading. It is permissible to define the load cases either in terms of forces or in terms of accelerations
applied to the mass being added and to the mass of the body plus any existing payload. The design cases shall
represent the most unfavourable cases that the operator wishes to consider associated with the use of the
wagon (including foreseeable abuse).

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/37

NOTE 1:

NOTE 2:

NOTE 3:

The factor of 1,3 shall be used instead of 1,95 quoted in table 8 of EN 12663 and note ‘a’ shall
not apply.
Loads may be distributed uniformly over the full load-carrying surface, over a limited area or
at discrete positions. The design case(s) shall be based on the most demanding applications.
If it is intended that wheeled vehicles (including fork-lift trucks etc.) will operate over the floor
of the wagon then the design shall accommodate the maximum local pressure loading
associated with such operations.

4.2.2.3.2.3. Load combinations

The structure shall also conform to the requirements of Clause 3.4 of EN12663 when subject to the most
adverse load combinations as specified in Clause 4.4 of EN12663 .

4.2.2.3.2.4. Lifting and Jacking

The wagon body shall incorporate lifting points by which the whole wagon is capable of being safely lifted or
jacked. It shall also be possible to lift one end of the wagon (including its running gear) with the other end
resting on the remaining running gear.

The load cases specified in Clause 4.3.2 of EN12663 shall apply for lifting and jacking under workshop and
servicing operations.

For lifting cases associated only with rescue following derailment or other abnormal incident, where some
permanent deformation of the structure is acceptable, it is permissible to reduce the load factor in Tables 9 and
10 from 1,1 to 1,0.

If a factor of 1,0 is used for a validation test, the measured strains shall be extrapolated to demonstrate the
conformance to the higher factor.

The lifting shall occur via designated lifting points. The location of the lifting points shall be defined by the
customer's operational requirements.

4.2.2.3.2.5. Equipment Attachment (Including body/bogie)

The attachments of equipment shall be designed either:

— to carry the loads specified in tables 12, 13 and 14 of Section 4.5 of EN12663

Or as an alternative

— to be validated by carrying out an buffing test as described in Annex Z.

4.2.2.3.2.6. Other Exceptional Loads

The load requirements for structural parts of the wagon body, such as side and end wall structures, doors,
stanchions and load restraint systems shall be designed to carry the maximum loads they will experience in
performing their intended function. The load cases shall be determined using the principles for structural
design given in EN12663.

Annex YY provides suitable design requirements for common types of wagon features that are in general use.
However they shall be used only where they are applicable.

For new types of wagon the designer shall determine appropriate load cases to meet the specific requirements
using the principles given in EN12663.

4.2.2.3.3.

Service (fatigue) Loads

4.2.2.3.3.1. Sources of load input.

All sources of cyclic loading that can cause fatigue damage shall be identified. In accordance with Clause 4.6 of
EN12663, the inputs listed in Annex N shall be considered and the way in which they are represented and
combined shall be consistent with the intended use of the freight wagon. The definition of the load cases shall
also be consistent with the material fatigue design code to be used as described in Clause 5.2 and method of
validation in Clause 6.3 of EN12663. Where the fatigue load cases act in combination, they shall be taken into
account in a manner consistent with the characteristics of the loads and the form of design analysis and fatigue
design code being employed.

L 344/38

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

For most conventional wagon designs the loading defined in Table 16 of EN12663 can be considered as
sufficient to represent the full effective combination of fatigue load cycles.

Where detailed data are not available, Annex CC shall be used to determine the main sources of fatigue loading.

4.2.2.3.3.2. Demonstration of fatigue strength

In accordance with Clause 5.2 of EN12663, the behaviour of materials under fatigue loading shall be based on
current European Standard, or alternative sources of equivalent standing, wherever such sources are available.
Acceptable material fatigue design codes are Eurocode 3 and Eurocode 9 as well as the method described in
Annex N.

4.2.2.3.4.

Stiffness of the main vehicle structure

4.2.2.3.4.1. Deflections

Deflections under the loads or load combinations shall not be such as to cause the wagon or its payload to
exceed the permitted operational envelope (see Annex C and Annex T).

Deflections shall also not impair the functionality of the wagon as a whole or that of any installed components
or systems.

4.2.2.3.4.2. Modes of vibration

The design process shall take into account that the natural modes of vibration of the wagon body, in all loading
conditions including tare, shall be separated sufficiently, or otherwise de-coupled from the suspension
frequencies, so as to avoid the occurrence of undesirable responses at all operating speeds.

4.2.2.3.4.3. Torsional stiffness

The torsional stiffness of the wagon body shall be consistent with the suspension characteristics such that the
derailment criteria are achieved in all loading conditions including tare.

4.2.2.3.4.4. Equipment

The natural modes of vibration of equipment, on its mountings, shall be separated sufficiently, or otherwise de-
coupled from the wagon body or suspension frequencies, so as to avoid the occurrence of undesirable
responses at all operating speeds.

4.2.2.3.5.

Securing of Freight

Annex YY provides suitable design requirements for common types of features that are in general use. However
they shall be used only where they are applicable.

4.2.2.4.

Doors closing and locking

Doors and hatches of freight vehicles shall be designed to be closed and locked. This remains valid while the
vehicles are in a moving train (unless this is part of the procedure for discharging the payload). For this, locking
devices shall be used which indicate their status (open/closed) and they shall be visible by an operator outside
the train.

The locking devices shall be designed to be secured against unintentional opening during running. Closing and
locking systems shall be designed so that the operating staff are not placed at undue risk.

Suitable and clear instructions for use shall be applied near each locking device and shall be visible by the
operator.

The closing and locking devices shall be designed to withstand the loads which are caused by the payload under
normal, regular conditions and when the payload has been displaced in a foreseeable manner.

The closing and locking devices shall be designed to withstand the loads that occur while the vehicles are
passing other trains under all conditions, including when in tunnels.

The forces, which are needed to actuate the closing and locking devices, shall be of a magnitude that can be
applied by an operator without additional tools. Exceptions are allowable when additional tools are specifically

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/39

made available or when motor driven systems are used.

The closing and locking systems shall be inspected at normal maintenance periods and remedial action taken if
signs of damage or malfunction are found.

4.2.2.5.

Marking of freight wagons

Markings are required on wagons to:

— Identify each individual wagon by its unique number, as specified in the Traffic Operations and

Management TSI, and recorded in the Register.

— Provide information required to produce train consists, including brake mass, length over buffers, tare

weight, speed versus load table for different line categories.

— Identify operational restrictions to staff, including geographical limitations, and shunting restrictions.

— Provide pertinent safety information for staff operating wagons or attending in an emergency, including
overhead live wire and electrical equipment warning signs, lift/jacking points, vehicle specific safety
instructions.

These markings are listed in the Annex B and pictograms are included if required. The markings shall be
located as high as practicable on the wagon structure up to a height of 1 600 mm above rail level. Hazard
signs shall be located in such a position that they can be seen before the hazard zone is actually reached.
The markings of wagons that do not have vertical sides +/- 10 degrees, shall be affixed on special panels.

Markings may be achieved either by painting or by decals.

The requirements for Dangerous Goods Markings are covered by directive 96/49/EC with its valid Annex

When changes to a wagon occur that require changes to the markings, such changes shall be consistent
with changes to the data recorded in the Rolling Stock Register.

Markings shall be cleaned/replaced when required to ensure that they remain legible.

4.2.2.6.

Dangerous goods

4.2.2.6.1. General

Wagons carrying dangerous goods shall meet the requirements of this TSI and in addition the requirements of
RID.

Further developments in this legal area are led by an international working group (RID-Committee) of
representatives from the governments which are members of the COTIF.

4.2.2.6.2.

Legislation applicable to rolling stock for the transport of dangerous goods

Rolling Stock

Council Directive 96/49/EC and its Annex in their
valid version

Marking and Labelling

Council Directive 96/49/EC and its Annex in their
valid version

Buffers

Spark protection

Council Directive 96/49/EC and its Annex in their
valid version

Council Directive 96/49/EC and its Annex in their
valid version

L 344/40

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Use of wagons for the transport of Dangerous Goods
in long tunnels

Under examination by working groups mandated by
the European Commission (AEIF and RID)

4.2.2.6.3. Additional legislation applicable to tanks

Tank

Tank testing, inspection and marking

Council Directive 1999/36/EC on transportable
pressure equipment (TPED) in its valid version

EN 12972 Tanks for transport of dangerous goods-
testing, inspection and marking of metallic tanks from
April 2001

4.2.2.6.4. Maintenance rules

The maintenance of tank/freight wagons shall be compliant with the following European Standard and the
Council Directive:

— Testing and inspection

— Maintenance of Tank and its equipment

— Mutual agreements on Tank-inspectors

EN 12972 Tanks for transport of dangerous goods-
testing, inspection and marking of metallic tanks from
April 2001

Council Directive 96/49/EC and its Annex in their
valid version

Council Directive 96/49/EC and its Annex in their
valid version

4.2.3.

VEHICLE TRACK INTERACTION AND GAUGING

4.2.3.1.

Kinematic gauge

This section defines the maximum outside dimensions of wagons to ensure that they remain within the
infrastructure gauge. To achieve this, the maximum possible movement of the wagon is considered; this is
called the kinematic envelope.

The kinematic envelope of the rolling stock is defined by means of a reference profile and its associated rules. It
is obtained by applying the rules giving reductions in relation to the reference profile, which the various parts
of the rolling stock shall meet.

These reductions depend on:

— the geometric characteristics of the rolling stock in question,

— the position of the cross-section in relation to the bogie pivot or to the axles,

— the height of the point considered in relation to the running surface,

— constructional tolerances,

— the maximum wear allowance,

— the elastic characteristics of the suspension.

The study of the maximum construction gauge takes into account both the lateral and vertical movements of
the rolling stock, drawn up on the basis of the geometrical and suspension characteristics of the vehicle under
various loading conditions.

The construction gauge of rolling stock travelling on a given section of line shall be smaller, by an appropriate
safety margin, than the minimum structure gauge of the line in question.

A rolling stock gauge comprises two fundamental elements: a reference profile and the rules for that profile. It
allows determination of the maximum dimensions of rolling stock and the position of fixed structures on the
line.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/41

In order that a rolling stock gauge is applicable, the following three parts of that gauge shall be specified:

— the reference profile;

— the rules for determining the maximum construction gauge for the wagons;

— the rules for determining the clearances to structures and the track spacing.

Annex C specifies the reference profile and the rules for the maximum construction gauge for wagons.

The associated rules for determining the clearances for installation of structures are covered in the
Infrastructure TSI.

All equipment and parts of wagons that give rise to transverse and vertical displacements shall be checked at
appropriate maintenance intervals.

In order to keep the wagon inside the kinematic gauge, the maintenance plan shall include provision for
inspection of the following items:

— wheel profile and wear,

— bogie frame,

— springs,

— side bearers,

— body structure,

— constructional clearances,

— maximum wear allowance,

— elastic characteristics of the suspension,

— axle guide wear ,

— elements that affect the vehicle flexibility coefficient,

— elements that affect the roll centre.

— Devices causing movements affecting the gauge

4.2.3.2.

Static axle load and linear load

The axle load and axle spacing of the vehicles defines the vertical quasi-static load input to the track.

The load limits for wagons take into account their geometrical characteristics, weights per axle and weights per
linear metre.

They shall be in accordance with the classification of lines or sections of lines, categories A, B1, B2, C2, C3, C4,
D2, D3, D4 as defined in the table below.

Axle loads higher than 22,5 tonnes are not specified in this TSI; existing national rules continue to apply to
lines capable of accepting these higher axle loads.

Classification

Mass per axle = P

Mass per unit length = p

5,0 t/m

A

16 t

A

B

18 t

B1

C

D

E

F

20 t

22,5 t

25,0 t

27,5 t

G

30 t

L 344/42

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Classification

Mass per axle = P

A

B

B2

C

C2

C3

C4

D

D2

D3

D4

E

F

G

E4

E5

6,4 t/m

7,2 t/m

8,0 t/m

8,8 t/m

10 t/m

p = Mass per unit length, i.e. the wagon mass plus the mass of the load, divided by the wagon length in

metres, measured over the buffers when non-compressed.

P = Mass per axle.

Annex D Table D.1 contains data from which a train made up of wagons with two 2-axle bogies is used in
order to determine the category in which a line is classified.

A line or section of line is classified in one of these categories when it is capable of handling an unlimited
number of wagons with the weight characteristics shown in the table above.

Classification according to the maximum mass per axle P is expressed in capital letters (A, B, C, D, E, F, G);
classification according to the maximum mass per unit length p is expressed in Arabic numerals (1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
6), except for Category A.

The lines thus classified are capable of handling the wagons listed below:

— Two or three-axle wagons, and wagons with 2-axle bogies, where the measurements a and b are equal to
or greater than the values shown in Annex D Table D.1, providing P and p do not exceed the values
shown in the table above.

— Two 2-axle bogie wagons where the measurements a and b are smaller than the values shown in
Annex D Table D.2, providing they have reduced mass per axle, Pr. complying with the values given in
Annex D Table D.3 in relation to the values of measurements a and b.

— Two bogie wagons, with 3 or 4 axles per bogie, providing they have reduced mass per axle, Pr, complying
with the values given in Annex D Tables D.4 and D.5 in relation to the values of dimensions a and b.

— Wagons with three or four 2-axle bogies provided they have reduced mass per axle, Pr, not exceeding
those defined in Annex D Table D.6 in relation to their geometrical characteristics and provided that they
also comply with the special regulations governing these types of wagon.

NOTE:

As an exception for 20 t axle-loads it is permissible to exceed this limit by up to 0,5 t per axle
on Category C lines for:

— 2-axle long wagons with 14,10 m < LOB (length over buffers) < 15,50 m to bring their

payload up to 25 t ;

— wagons designed for 22,5 t axle-loads to offset the extra tare incurred in making them

suitable for such axle-loads.

Wagons having irregular axle spacings not conforming with Annex D Sections D .3, D.4, D.5) shall be subject
to additional checks by calculation, to ensure that the maximum bending moments and shear forces on a single
beam of any span length do not exceed the values calculated for the wagons defined in Annex D Section D.1).
This shall be applied to an unlimited number of wagons.

The maximum payload that can be carried by a wagon, from the point of view of track and structures, is the
lowest value resulting from the following formulae:

X = n × P - T

Y = L × p - T

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/43

Z = n × Pr - T

where:

n: number of axles of the wagon
p: mass per unit length in t/m
length over buffers in m
L:
T: wagon tare in t, rounded up to the first decimal place
P: mass per axle in t
Pr: reduced mass per axle in t

The tare to be taken into account is the average tare, which shall be determined for the following groups of
wagons within each major manufacturing series:

— wagons with air brakes,

— wagons with air brakes and a gangway fitted with a screw brake.

The limits for modifications of freight wagons not requiring new approval are listed in Annex II.

Annex D Sections D.6 and D.7 give the load limits for 2-axle wagons and the commonest types of two 2-axle
bogie wagons (a = 1,80 m, b = 1,50 m (see definition in Annex D)) resulting from comparisons.

The value X, Y or Z selected on the basis of the comparison is rounded down either to the nearest half-tonne or
to the nearest tenth of a tonne, each contracting entity being free to select either of these alternatives depending
on the type of wagon.

However, for insulated, refrigerator or mechanically-refrigerated wagons, tank wagons and closed wagons used
for carrying goods in powder form, the X, Y or Z value shall be rounded down to the nearest tenth of a tonne.

The value to be marked on the wagon is not necessarily that established above. In cases where lower load limits
exist as a result of the structural characteristics of the wagon or RID regulations (COTIF agreement Annex D
Section D.3), it is these lower values that shall be indicated.

Minimum wheelset load for wagons with:

Generally with two axles or more
5,0 t
4,0 t
4-axle and equipped with brake blocks
Greater than 4-axle and equipped with brake blocks 3,5 t

If permitted by the infrastructure register (e.g. specific case of “rollende Landstrasse”)

8-axles
12- axles

2,0 t
1,3 t

4.2.3.3.

Rolling stock parameters which influence ground based train monitoring systems

4.2.3.3.1.

Electrical resistance:

The electrical resistance of each wheelset measured across the treads of the two wheels shall not exceed 0,01
ohm for new or reassembled wheelsets incorporating new components.

These resistance measurements are to be made using an applied voltage of 1,8 to 2,0 volts DC.

4.2.3.3.2. Hot axle box detection

Open point to be specified at the next revision of this TSI.

4.2.3.4.

Vehicle dynamic behaviour

4.2.3.4.1. General

The dynamic behaviour of a vehicle has strong effects on safety against derailment and running stability. The
vehicle dynamic behaviour is determined by

— the maximum speed

L 344/44

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

— static track features (alignment,

track gauge, cant,

rail

inclination, discrete and periodic track

irregularities)

— dynamic track features (horizontal and vertical track stiffness and track damping)

— wheel/rail contact parameters (Wheel and rail profile, track gauge)

— wheel defects (wheel flats, out of roundness)

— mass and inertia of car body, bogies and wheelsets

— suspension characteristic of the vehicles

— distribution of the payload.

In order to ensure safety and running stability, measurements in different operating conditions or comparison
studies with a proven design (e. g. simulation/calculation) have to be carried out to assess the dynamic
behaviour.

Rolling stock shall have characteristics that enable stable running within the applicable speed limit.

4.2.3.4.2.

Functional and technical specifications

4.2.3.4.2.1. Safety against derailment and running stability

In order to ensure safety against derailment and running stability the forces between wheel and rail have to be
limited. In particular, the forces in question are transverse track forces Y and vertical forces Q.

— Lateral track force Y

In order to prevent track shifts, interoperable Rolling stock shall comply with the Prud'homme criteria
for the maximum transverse force

(ΣY)lim = α (10 + P/3), where α = 0,85 and P = maximum static axle load

or

(H2m)lim ((H2m) is the floating mean value of the lateral force in an axle measured over 2m)

This value will be determined by the TSI Infrastructure

In curves, the limit of the quasi-static lateral force on the outer wheel is

Yqst, lim

This value will be determined by the TSI Infrastructure

— Y/Q forces

To limit the risk of wheel climb on the rail the quotient of lateral force Y and vertical load Q of a wheel
shall not exceed

(Y/Q)lim = 0,8 for large curves R ≥ 250 m

(Y/Q)lim = 1,2 for small curves R < 250 m

— Vertical force

The maximum dynamic vertical force exerted on the rail is

Qmax

This value will be determined by the TSI Infrastructure

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/45

In curves the limit of the quasi-static vertical force on the outer wheel is

Qqst, lim

This value will be determined by the TSI Infrastructure

4.2.3.4.2.2. Safety against derailment when running on twisted tracks

Wagons are able to run on twisted tracks when (Y/Q) does not exceed the limit given in section 4.2.3.4.2.1 in a
curve of radius R = 150m and for a given twisted track:

for a wheel base of 1,3 m ≤ 2a*

— g lim= 7 ‰ for 2a+ <4m

— g lim = 20/2a+ + 2 for 2a+>4m

— g lim=20/2a*+2 for 2a*<20m

— g lim=3 ‰ for 2a*>20 m

The wheelbase 2a* represents the axle spacing for 2-axle wagons or the distance between the pivot centres of a
bogie wagon. The wheelbase 2a+ represents the axle spacing for a bogie.

4.2.3.4.2.3. Maintenance rules

The following key parameters essential for safety and running stability shall be maintained according to the
maintenance plan:

— suspension characteristics

— body-bogie connections

— tread profile

The maximum and minimum dimensions for wheelsets and wheels for Standard Gauge are given in Annex E.

Cases for other track gauges are found in Section 7.

4.2.3.4.2.4. Suspension

Suspension of freight wagons shall be designed such that the values specified in 4.2.2.1.2.2 and 4.2.2.1.2.3 are
adhered to in the conditions “empty” and “laden to the load limit”. The suspension calculation shall
demonstrate that the suspension deflection is not exhausted when the wagons are fully loaded and considering
dynamic influences.

4.2.3.5.

Longitudinal compressive forces

4.2.3.5.1. General

This parameter describes the maximum longitudinal compressive forces that can be applied on an interoperable
freight wagon or an individual vehicle, or group of special coupled vehicles, of an interoperable train-set during
a braking or a banking operation, without any risk of derailment.

When subjected to Longitudinal Compressive Forces, the wagon shall continue to run safely. In order to ensure
safety against derailment, the wagon or system of coupled wagons shall be assessed by tests, calculations or
through comparison with the characteristics of already approved (certified) wagons.

The longitudinal force that can be applied on a vehicle without derailing shall be higher than a threshold value
depending on the vehicle design (two axle, bogie wagon, fixed group of vehicles, Combirail, Road- Railer™,
etc.) fitted with UIC coupler or accepted central coupler or coupling rod/short couplers.

The conditions to certify the wagons, fixed groups of wagons and coupled groups of wagons are given in
section 4.2.3.5.2.

L 344/46

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

The conditions that affect
withstanding without derailment include:

the maximum longitudinal compressive force that a wagon is capable of

— cant deficiency

— train and wagon braking system

— system of draw gear and buffers on the wagons or specially coupled wagon-groups

— design characteristics of the wagon

— characteristics of the line

— train driver's handling of the train, especially braking

— wheel/rail contact parameters (wheel and rail profile, track gauge)

— load distribution of the individual freight wagons

Longitudinal compressive forces have a strong effect on safety against derailment of a vehicle. Therefore
measurements in different operating conditions have been carried out to find the acceptable limits of
longitudinal compressive force that can be applied on a vehicle without risk of derailment. To avoid testing
wagons shall correspond with the characteristics of wagons that have been previously approved by national
safety authorities or on their behalf, or to be built according to approved design characteristics of wagons and
be fitted with approved components such as certified bogies

The reference test is given in Section 6.2. Experience with different wagon-types has resulted in different
length, wheelbase, overhang, distance
methods of acceptance depending on factors such as tare weight,
between pivots etc.

4.2.3.5.2.

Functional and technical specifications

The subsystem shall withstand the longitudinal compressive forces in the train without derailing or damaging
the vehicle. In particular the determining factors are

— transverse wheel/rail forces -Y-

— vertical forces -Q-

— lateral forces on axle-boxes -Hij-

— braking forces (due to wheel/rail contact, dynamic braking and different braking groups of the wagons

and trains)

— diagonal and vertical buffer forces

— coupling forces ±Z

— damping of buffer- and coupling forces

— the result of coupler tightness

— the result of coupler slack

— jerks as a result of longitudinal movements in the trains and coupler slack

— Wheel lift

— Axle guide deflection

Longitudinal Compressive Forces (LCF) are influenced by many factors. The different factors are given in the
documents for construction and operating conditions of wagons to which it is necessary to certify wagons for
normal traffic on different lines and under different conditions.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/47

With the objective to certify wagons for mixed traffic on the European Network, tests on a special testing track,
and in running trains on different lines were performed in order to ensure that wagons can withstand a
minimum longitudinal force, without derailing. The following definition was made:

Wagons and rakes of wagons (with coupling rod/short coupler between the wagons) fitted with screw
couplings and side-buffers at their outer ends, shall withstand a minimum longitudinal force measured in the
conditions of the reference test of:

— 200 kN for two-axle freight wagons with UIC coupling

— 240 kN for freight wagons fitted with two-axle bogies with UIC coupling

— 500 kN for freight wagons with all types of central bar couplers and without buffers

For other coupling systems, limit values are not yet defined.

The coefficient of friction of the buffer heads shall be such as to meet the requirements of this TSI in terms of
maximum lateral forces.

Maintenance rules:

If the buffer heads have to be lubricated in order to ensure the required coefficient of friction, then the
maintenance plan shall include provision for maintaining the coefficient of friction at this level.

4.2.4.

BRAKING

4.2.4.1.

Braking performance

4.2.4.1.1. General

The purpose of the train braking system is to ensure that the train's speed can be reduced or it can be stopped
within the maximum allowable braking distance. The primary factors that influence the brake process are the
braking power, the train mass, the speed, the allowable braking distance, the adhesion and the track gradient.

Braking performance of a train or a vehicle is the result of the braking power available to retard the train within
defined limits and all factors involved in the conversion and dissipation of energy including train resistance.
Individual vehicle performance is defined so that the overall braking performance of the train can be derived.

Vehicles shall be equipped with continuous automatic brake.

A brake is continuous if it allows the transmission of signals and energy from central command unit to the
whole train.

A continuous brake is automatic, if it becomes effective immediately on the whole train with every inadvertent
break of the control train line, e. g. brake-pipe.

Where it is not possible to detect the state of the brake, an indicator showing the state shall be provided on
both sides of the vehicle.

The brake energy storage (e.g. supply reservoirs of indirect pneumatic air brake system, brake pipe air) and the
brake energy used to build up the brake effort (e.g. air from brake cylinders of indirect pneumatic air brake
system) shall be used only for braking use.

4.2.4.1.2.

Functional and Technical Specification

4.2.4.1.2.1. Control train line

The minimum propagation braking signal speed shall be 250 m/s.

4.2.4.1.2.2 Braking Performance elements

Braking performance shall take into account mean application time, instantaneous deceleration, mass and
initial speed. Braking performance shall be determined by both deceleration profiles and by braked mass
percentage.

L 344/48

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Deceleration profile:

The deceleration profile describes the predicted instantaneous deceleration of the vehicle (at the level of a
vehicle) or the train (at the level of a train) in normal conditions.

Knowledge of individual vehicle deceleration profiles enables the calculation of the overall train deceleration
profile.

The deceleration profile includes the effect of:

a)

the response time between brake demand and reaching full brake effort.

Te is the equivalent build-up application time and is defined as:

Te = t1 + (t2/2)

For pneumatic brake the end of the time t2 corresponds to 95 % of established brake cylinder pressure.

b)

the corresponding function (deceleration = F(speed)) as defined as a succession of sections with a
constant deceleration.

Note: a denotes the instantaneous deceleration and V the instantaneous speed

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/49

Brake mass percentage:

The brake mass percentage (lambda) is the ratio of the sum of the brake masses divided by the sum of the
masses of the vehicles.

The method of determining the brake mass/brake mass percentage shall remain applicable in addition to the
method of deceleration profiles; the manufacturer shall supply these values. This information is required to be
entered in the Rolling Stock Register.

Braking power for an individual vehicle shall be determined in emergency braking for each braking mode (i.e.
G, P, R, P + ep) available on the vehicle and for several loading conditions including at least tare and fully
loaded.

G braking mode: brake mode used for freight trains with specified brake application time and brake release
time.

P braking mode: brake mode for freight trains with specified brake application time and brake release time and
specified brake mass percentage.

R braking mode: brake mode for passenger trains and fast freight trains with specified brake application time
and brake release time as for braking mode P and specified minimum brake mass percentage.

Ep brake (indirect Electro-pneumatic brake): assistance to indirect air brake that uses an electrical command
on the train and electro-pneumatic valves on the vehicle and thus starts operating more rapidly and less jerkily
than the conventional air brake.

Emergency braking: Emergency braking is a brake command that stops the train to ensure the specified level
of safety without any brake system degradation.

The minimum braking performance for brake-modes G and P: shall be in accordance with the following table:

Braking Mode
—
Te range (s)

Wagon Type

Command Equipment

Load

Requirement for running speed at 100km/h

Requirement for running speed at 120km/h

Maxi

Mini

Maxi

Mini

S = 700 m
λ = 100 %
γ = 0,88 m/s2

Case A — composite
blocks:
S = 580 m, λ = 125 %, γ =
1,08 m/s2
Case B — other cases:
S = 560 m, λ = 130 %, γ =
1,13 m/s2

Braking mode “P” - 1,5
≤Te ≤ 3 s

All

All

EMPTY

S = 480m
λ = 100 % (1)
γ = 0,91 m/s2 (1)

“S1” (2)

Empty/
Load
Device

Intermediate Load

S = 810 m
λ = 55 %
γ = 0,51m/s2

LOADED
(Maximum = 22,5 t/
axle)

S = 700 m
λ = 65 %
γ = 0,60 m/s2

“S2” (3)

Variable load Relay

LOADED
(Maximum = 22,5 t/
axle)

S = 700m
λ = 65 %
γ = 0,60 m/s2

Case A — composite
blocks:
S = 390 m, λ = 125 %, γ =
1,15 m/s2
Case B — other cases:
S = 380 m, λ = 130 %, γ =
1,18 m/s2

Case A — composite
blocks:
S = 390 m, λ = 125 %, γ =
1,15 m/s2
Case B — other cases:
S = 380 m, λ = 130 %, γ=
1,18 m/s2

Case A — Brake only on
wheels (Brake blocks):
S = greater of (S = 480 m, λ
= 100 %, γ = 0,91 m/s2) or
(S obtained with a mean
retardation force of
16,5 kN per axle (5).
Case B — Other cases:
S = 480 m, λ = 100 %, γ =
0,91 m/s2

Case A — Brake only on
wheels (Brake blocks):
S = greater of (S = 480 m, λ
= 100 %, γ = 0,91 m/s2) or
(S obtained with a mean
retardation force of
16,5 kN per axle (5).
Case B — Other cases:
S = 480 m, λ = 100 %,
γ=0,91 m/s2

L

3
4
4
/
5
0

E
N

O

f
f
i
c
i
a
l

J
o
u
r
n
a
l

o
f

t
h
e

E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n

U
n
o
n

i

.

.

8
1
2
2
0
0
6

Braking Mode
—
Te range (s)

Braking mode “G” — 9
≤ Te≤ 15 s

Wagon Type

Command Equipment

Load

Requirement for running speed at 100km/h

Requirement for running speed at 120km/h

“SS” (4)

Variable load relay

LOADED
(Maximum = 22,5 t/
axle)

Case A — Brake only on wheels (Brake blocks):
S = greater of (S = 700 m, λ = 100 %, γ = 0,88 m/s2) or (S
obtained with a mean retardation force of 16 kN per
axle (6).
Case B — Other cases:
S = 700 m, λ = 100 %, γ = 0,88 m/s2

There shall be no separate assessment of the braking
power of wagons in position G. A wagon's braked mass
in position G shall be the same as braked mass in
position P

S is obtained according annex S, “λ” = ((C/S)-D) according annex S, “γ” = ((Speed (Km/h))/3,6)2)/(2x(S-((Te)x(Speed (Km/h)/3,6)))), with Te=2sec.
a wagon “S1” is a wagon with Empty/load device
a wagon “S2” is a wagon with a variable load relay
a wagon “SS” shall be equipped with a variable load relay.

(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5) The maximum mean retardation force admitted (for running speed at 100km/h) is 18x0,91 = 16,5 kN/axle. This value comes from the maximum braking energy input permitted on a clasp braked wheel with a nominal new diameter in the range

of [920 mm; 1 000 mm] during braking (the brake mass shall be limited to 18 tonnes). Wheels with a nominal new diameter (< 920 mm) and/or push brakes shall be accepted in accordance with national rules.

(6) The maximum mean retardation force admitted (for running speed at 120km/h) is 18x0,88 = 16 kN/axle. This value comes from the maximum braking energy input permitted on a clasp braked wheel with a nominal new diameter in the range of

[920 mm; 1 000 mm] during braking (the brake mass shall be limited to 18 tonnes). Wheels with a nominal new diameter (< 920 mm) and/or push brakes shall be accepted in accordance with national rules.

.

.

8
1
2
2
0
0
6

E
N

O

f
f
i
c
i
a
l

J
o
u
r
n
a
l

o
f

t
h
e

E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n

U
n
o
n

i

L

3
4
4
/
5
1

L 344/52

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

This table is based on a reference speed of 100 km/h and an axle load of 22,5 t and 120 km/h and an axle load
of 22,5 t. Higher axle loads can be accepted under specific operational conditions in accordance with national
rules. The permitted maximum axle load shall be in accordance with the infrastructure requirements.

If a wagon is equipped with a WSP, the above performance shall be achieved without activation of the WSP and
according to the conditions in annex S.

Other braking modes (example: R braking mode) are permitted according to national rules and the mandatory
use of WSP as specified in § 4.2.4.1.2.6.

Brake Pipe Emptying Accelerator valve

If the brake pipe-emptying accelerator is separately installed on the wagon, it shall be capable of isolation from
the brake pipe by a specific device. The wagon shall be clearly marked to indicate this isolation device, or this
device shall be secured in an “open” position by a seal.

4.2.4.1.2.3. Mechanical components

The assembly of brake components shall be aimed to prevent any partial or full detachment of these
components.

— Slack adjuster

A device to automatically maintain the design clearance between the friction pair shall be provided.

A minimum of 15 mm clearance between the slack adjuster envelope and other components shall be
provided.

Provision shall be made for the necessary free clearances for the slack adjuster extremities and
connections to be maintained at all times.

For slack adjusters within a bogie, there is no special envelope. But, for all design conditions, the
minimum clearance necessary between the slack adjuster and other components shall be ensured to
prevent contact. Should a smaller clearance be required, the reasons why contact will not occur shall be
demonstrated.

— Pneumatic half coupling

The opening of the automatic air brake coupling head shall face the left when looking at the end of the
vehicle. The opening of the main reservoir coupling head shall face the right when looking at the end of
the vehicle.

The vehicles shall be fitted with devices to enable the unused couplings to be suspended at least 140 mm
above rail level to prevent both damage and, as far possible, penetration of foreign bodies into the
interior coupling.

4.2.4.1.2.4. Energy storage

The energy storage shall be sufficient to obtain during an emergency braking at maximum speed, whatever the
loaded state of the vehicle, the maximum brake effort without any further supply of energy (e.g. for indirect
compressed air brake system: Brake Pipe only without replenishment by main reservoir pipe). When a vehicle is
equipped with WSP the above condition applies with the WSP fully operational (i.e. WSP air consumption).

4.2.4.1.2.5. Energy limits:

The brake system shall be designed to allow the vehicle to run on all existing lines of the trans-European
conventional rail system.

The brake system shall stop the vehicle loaded and maintain the speed of the vehicle without any thermal or
mechanical damage in the following conditions:

1.

Two successive emergency braking applications from the maximum speed to a stop on straight and level
track with minimum wind and dry rail.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/53

2.

Maintain a speed of 80 km/h in a slope with a mean declivity of 21 ‰ and a length of 46 km. (The south
slope of St Gothard's line between Airolo and Biasca is the reference slope.)

4.2.4.1.2.6. Wheel slide protection (WSP)

Wheel slide protection (WSP) is a system designed to make the best use of available adhesion by a controlled
reduction and restoration of the brake force to prevent wheelsets from locking and uncontrolled sliding,
thereby optimising stopping distance. The WSP shall not alter the functional characteristics of the brakes. The
vehicle's air equipment shall be dimensioned such that the air consumption of the WSP does not impair the
performance of the pneumatic brake. The design process of the WSP shall take into account that the WSP shall
not have a detrimental effect on the constituent parts of the vehicle (brake gear, wheel tread, axle boxes, etc).

The following types of wagons shall be fitted with WSP:

a)

b)

equipped with brake blocks made of cast iron or sintered material, for which the maximum mean
utilisation of adhesion (δ)is greater than 12 %(Lambda ≥ 135 %).The maximum mean utilisation of
adhesion is shown by calculating the mean adhesion (δ) from individual braking distances obtained from
the possible range of vehicle mass. δ is therefore related to the measured braking distances necessary for
determining the braking performance. (δ = f(V, Te, Stopping distance).

equipped with disc brakes only, for which the maximum utilisation of adhesion (see above for the
definition of the maximum utilisation of adhesion (δ))
is greater than 11 % and less than 12 %
(125<Lambda </= 135 %)..

c) With maximum operating speed ≥ 160 km/h.

4.2.4.1.2.7. Air-supply

Freight wagons shall be designed to be able to work with compressed air compliant at least with class 4.4.5 as
defined by ISO 8573-1.

4.2.4.1.2.8. Parking Brake

A Parking Brake is a brake used to prevent parked rolling stock moving under the specified conditions taking
into account the place, wind, gradient and rolling stock loading state, until intentionally released.

It is not compulsory for all wagons to be equipped with a parking brake. Operational rules, taking into account
the fact that not all wagons in a train are equipped with these brakes, are described in the Traffic Operation and
Management TSI.

If the wagon is equipped with a parking brake, it shall meet the following requirements.

The power source for providing the parking brake effort shall be derived from a different power source than the
Automatic Service/Emergency brake.

The parking brake shall operate on at least half of the wheelsets, with a minimum of 2 wheelsets per wagon.

Where it is not possible to see the state of the parking brake, an indicator showing the state shall be provided
on both sides on the outside of the vehicle.

The wagon parking brake shall be accessed and operated from the ground or on the vehicle. Handles or hand
wheels shall be used to operate the parking brake, but only hand wheels may be used for brakes operated from
the ground. Parking brakes that are accessible from the ground shall be available on both sides of the vehicle.
Handles or hand wheels shall apply the brakes when they are turned in a clockwise direction.

Where the parking brake controls are fitted inside a vehicle, they shall be accessible from both sides of the
vehicle. Where the parking brake can be superimposed with other brake applications, either whilst moving or
statically, the vehicle equipment shall be able to withstand the imposed loads for the life of the vehicle.

It shall be possible to release the parking brake manually in an emergency situation at standstill.

The parking brake shall conform to the table below

L 344/54

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Wagon not specifically listed below.

At least 20 % of a fleet of wagons shall have a parking
brake operated from the wagon (platform or gang-
way) or the ground,.

Wagons built specifically for the transport of loads
requiring precautions as follows or/and according to
Council Directive 96/49/EC (RID):
Livestock; fragile loads; compressed or liquefied gases;
materials which give off inflammable gases when in
contact with water causing combustion; acids;
corrosive or combustible liquids; loads igniting
spontaneously, catching fire or exploding easily.

Wagons whose special fittings for accommodating
the load shall be treated with caution, i.e. carboy, jar
or cask wagons; tanks of aluminium; tanks lined with
ebonite or enamel; crane wagons. (or/and according
to Council Directive 96/49/EC (RID))

One per wagon operated from the vehicle (platform
or gangway)

One per wagon operated from the wagon (platform
or gangway).

Wagons with a superstructure built specifically for
the transport of road vehicles, including the multi-
deck wagons for the transport of motor cars.

One per wagon operated from the wagon (platform
or gangway) and 20 % of these having the parking
brake also operated from the wagon floor.

Wagons for the transport of de-mountable swap
bodies for horizontal transhipment.

One per wagon operated from the ground.

Wagons comprising several permanently coupled
units

A minimum of two axles (on one unit)

The parking brake shall be designed such that fully loaded wagons shall be held in a gradient of 4,0 % with
maximum adhesion of 0,15 with no wind.

4.2.5.

COMMUNICATION

4.2.5.1.

Vehicle capability to transmit information from vehicle to vehicle

This parameter is not yet applicable for freight wagons.

4.2.5.2.

Vehicle capability to transmit information between ground and vehicle

4.2.5.2.1. General

Application of tags is not mandatory. If a wagon is fitted with radio-frequency identification devices (RFID-tag),
the following specification shall be applied.

4.2.5.2.2.

Functional and technical specification

Two ‘passive’ tags shall be fitted, one on each side of the wagon in the areas indicated in Annex F figure F.1,
such that the unique identification number of the wagon can be read by a trackside device (the tag reader).

When available, trackside devices (tag reader) shall be capable of decoding tags passing at a speed of up to
30 km/h and make this decoded information available to a ground-based data transmission system.

Typical installation constraints are given in the Annex F figure F.2 where the reader position is defined by a
cone.

The physical interactions between the reader and the tag, the protocols and the commands, and the collision
arbitration schemes, shall conform to ISO18000-6 type A.

When fitted, tag readers shall be positioned at entry and exit points of locations where train formation can be
changed.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/55

The tag reader shall provide at a minimum to the interface with any data transmission system the following:

— Unambiguous identification of the tag reader, among those that may be installed in the same location, in

order to identify the track being monitored,

— Unique identification of every wagon passing,

— Time and date for each wagon passing.

Time and date information shall be accurate enough in order that a subsequent processing system is able to
identify the actual physical train composition.

4.2.5.2.3. Maintenance rules

Inspections according to the maintenance plan shall include:

— presence of tags

— correct response

— processes to ensure that tags will not be degraded during the maintenance procedures

4.2.6.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS

4.2.6.1.

Environmental conditions

4.2.6.1.1. General

The design process of the rolling stock, as well as the on-board equipment, shall take into account that this
rolling stock shall be able to be put into service and operate normally in the conditions and climatic zones for
which the equipment is designed and in which it is likely to run, as specified in this TSI.

The environmental conditions are expressed in classes for temperature etc. thereby giving the choice for the
operator to procure a vehicle suitable for operation all over Europe, or have a restricted use.

The ‘Register of Infrastructure’ will specify the ranges of environmental conditions likely to be experienced on
the individual lines. The same ranges will be used to assist reference to operating rules.

The range limits specified are those which have a low probability of being exceeded. All specified values are
maximum or limit values. These values may be reached, but do not occur permanently. Depending on the
situation there may be different frequencies of occurrence related to a certain period of time.

4.2.6.1.2.

Functional and technical specifications

4.2.6.1.2.1. Altitude

The wagons shall perform as specified for all altitudes up to 2000 m.

4.2.6.1.2.2. Temperature

All freight wagons intended for international traffic shall comply as a minimum with temperature class TRIV.

The class TRIV is identical to the temperature design level of all RIV compliant wagons existing before
implementation of this TSI. The design level for class TRIV is given in Annex O.

L 344/56

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

In addition to design level class TRIV the external temperature classes Ts and Tn exists.

Classes

TRIV

Tn

Ts

Design level classes

Subsystems and components have different temperature requirements.
Details are given in Annex O

Air temperature range external to vehicle [ oC]:

-40 + 35

-25 + 45

A TRIV wagon is permitted to operate in:

— permanent use on Ts lines.

— permanent use on Tn lines in the period of the year when temperature is expected to be above - 25 oC.

— non-permanent use on Tn lines in the period of the year when temperature is expected to be below -

25 oC.

Remark: It will be the choice of the contracting entity to decide the additional temperature range of the wagon
according to its intended use (Tn, Ts, Tn + Ts, or nothing more than TRIV).

4.2.6.1.2.3. Humidity

The following external humidity levels shall be considered:

Yearly average: ≤ 75 % relative humidity.

On 30 days in the year continuously: between 75 % and 95 % relative humidity.

On the other days occasionally: between 95 % and 100 % relative humidity

Maximum absolute humidity: 30 g/m3 occurring in tunnels.

An operationally caused infrequent and slight moisture condensation shall not lead to any malfunction or
failure.

The psychometric charts of Annex G fig. G1 and G2 give the range of variation of the relative humidity for the
different temperature classes that it is considered will not be exceeded for more than 30 days per year.

At cooled surfaces, 100 % relative humidity may occur causing condensation on parts of equipment; this shall
not lead to any malfunction or failure.

Sudden changes of the air temperature local to the vehicle may cause condensation of water on parts of
equipment with rate of 3 K/s and maximum variation of 40 K.

These conditions occurring particularly when entering or leaving a tunnel shall not lead to any malfunction or
failure of the equipment.

4.2.6.1.2.4. Air movement

For wind speeds to be considered for the design of freight wagons refer to section Aerodynamic effects.

4.2.6.1.2.5. Rain

A rain rate of 6 mm/min shall be taken into account. The effect of rain shall be considered depending on the
equipment installation together with wind and vehicle movement.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/57

4.2.6.1.2.6. Snow, ice and hail

Consideration shall be given to the effect of all kinds of snow, ice and/or hail. The maximum diameter of
hailstones shall be taken as 15 mm, larger diameters may occur exceptionally.

4.2.6.1.2.7. Solar radiation

Equipment design shall allow for direct exposure to solar radiation at the rate of 1 120 W/m2 for a maximum
duration of 8h.

4.2.6.1.2.8. Resistance to Pollution

The effects of pollution shall be considered in the design of equipment and components. The severity of
pollution will depend upon the location of the equipment. Means may be provided to reduce pollution by the
effective use of protection. The effects of the following kinds of pollution shall be considered:

Chemically active substances

Class 5C2 of EN 60721-3-5:1997.

Contaminating fluids

Class 5F2 (electrical engine) of EN 60721-3-5:1997.
Class 5F3 (thermal engine) of EN 60721-3-5:1997.

Biologically active substances

Class 5B2 of EN 60721-3-5:1997.

Dust

Defined by class 5S2 of EN 60721-3-5:1997.

Stones and other objects

Ballast and other of maximum 15 mm diameter.

Grasses and leaves, pollen, flying insects, fibres etc.

For the design of ventilation ducts

Sand

Sea spray

According to EN 60721-3-5:1997.

According to EN 60721-3-5:1997
Class 5C2.

4.2.6.2.

Aerodynamic effects

Open point to be specified at the next revision of this TSI.

4.2.6.3.

Cross winds

Open point to be specified at the next revision of this TSI.

4.2.7.

SYSTEM PROTECTION

4.2.7.1.

Emergency Measures

There is no requirement for emergency exits or signposting relating to emergency exits on freight wagons.
However, in the event of an accident, there is a requirement for a rescue plan and related information notices.

4.2.7.2.

Fire safety

4.2.7.2.1.

General

— Design shall limit fire ignition and propagation.

— Toxic fume requirements are not described by this TSI

— The goods carried on freight wagons shall not be taken into account — neither as a primary ignition
source nor as a mean of feeding fire propagation. In the case of dangerous goods carried on freight
wagons, RID requirements shall be applied in all aspects of fire safety.

— The goods of freight wagons shall be protected against foreseeable sources of ignition on the vehicle.

L 344/58

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

— The material used on freight wagons shall limit the generation, propagation of fire, and production of

smoke in the event of fire on primary ignition source of 7 kW during 3 min

— The design rules shall be applied for any fixed equipment of the vehicle, if it is a potential source of fire

ignition, e.g. cooling devices containing fuel.

— A Member State shall not require smoke detectors to be installed on freight wagons.

— Flexible covers shall not be required to meet any fire criteria

— Floors material shall not be required to meet any fire criteria if they are protected according the first

sentence of section 4.2.7.2.2.3.

4.2.7.2.2.

Functional and technical specification

4.2.7.2.2.1. Definitions

Fire integrity:

The ability of a separating construction element, when exposed to fire on one side, to prevent the passage
through it of flames, hot gases and other fire effluents or the occurrence of flames on the unexposed side.

Thermal insulation:

The ability of a separating construction element to prevent excessive transmission of heat.

4.2.7.2.2.2. Normative References

1

2

3

4

5

EN 1363-1

Fire resistance tests

October 1999

Part 1: General requirements

EN ISO 4589-2

Determination of burning behaviour by oxygen index

October 1998

Part 2: Ambient temperature test

ISO 5658-2

Reaction to fire tests — Spread of flame

1996-08-01

Part 2 Lateral spread on building products in vertical configuration

EN ISO 5659-2

Plastic — Smoke generation

October 1998

Part 2: Determination of optical density by a single chamber test

EN 50355

November 2002

Railway applications — Railway rolling stock cables having special fire
performance — Thin wall and standard wall — Guide to use

4.2.7.2.2.3. Design rules

Spark protection of the load shall be provided separately where the floor does not provide that protection.

The underside of the vehicle floor, in those locations where it is exposed to potential sources of fire and when
spark protection is not provided, shall be provided with thermal insulation and fire integrity according the heat
curve of EN 1363-1 [1] with a duration of 15 minutes.

4.2.7.2.2.4. Material requirement

In the following table the parameters used to define requirements and their characteristics, are listed. Also stated
is whether the numerical value in the tables of requirements represents a maximum or minimum for
compliance.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/59

A reported result equal to the requirement is compliant.

Test Method

Parameter

EN ISO 4589-2 [2]

ISO 5658 [3]

EN ISO 5659-2 [4]

LOI

CFE

Ds max

Units

% Oxygen

KWm-2

Dimensionless

Requirement definition

minimum

minimum

maximum

A short explanation of the test methods is given below:

— EN ISO 4589-2 [2] Determination of burning behaviour by oxygen index

This test specifies methods for determining the minimum concentration of oxygen, in ad-mixture with
nitrogen, which will support combustion of small vertical test specimens under specified test conditions.
The test results are defined as oxygen index values by volume percentages.

— ISO 5658 –2 [3] Reaction to fire tests — Spread of flame- part 2 Lateral spread on products in

vertical position

This test specifies a method of test for measuring the lateral spread of flame along the surface of a
specimen of product orientated in vertical position.
It provides data suitable for comparing the
performance of essentially flat materials, composites or assemblies, which are used primarily as the
exposed surfaces of walls.

— EN-ISO 5659-2 [4] Smoke generation part 2 Determination of optical density by a single-

chamber test.

The specimen of the product is mounted horizontally within a chamber and exposed to thermal
radiation on their upper surfaces at selected levels of constant irradiance of 50 kW/m2 in the absence of a
pilot flame.

Minimum Requirements

Parts or materials having a surface area less than the surface classification below, shall be tested with minimum
requirements

Test Method

EN ISO 4589-2 [2]

Parameter

LOI

Unit

% Oxygen

Requirement

≥ 26

Requirements for material used as surface

Method: Conditions Para-
meter

ISO 5658-2 [3]
CFE

EN ISO 5659-2 [4]
50kWm-2

Surface classification

Parameter

CFE

Unit

kWm-2

Ds max

Dimensionless

Requirement

≥ 18

≤ 600

All materials used shall meet the minimum requirements where the surface area of the material/item is less than
0,25m2 and
on a ceiling:

— the maximum dimension in any direction on the surface is less than 1m and

— the separation from another surface is greater than the maximum extent of the surface (measured

horizontally in any direction on the surface).

L 344/60

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

on a wall:

— the maximum dimension in a vertical direction is less than 1m and

— the separation from another surface is greater than the maximum extent of the surface (measured

vertically)

If a surface is larger than 0,25 m2, then requirements for material used as surface applies.

Cable requirements

Cable used for electrical installation on freight wagons shall be in accordance with EN 50355 [5]. For fire safety
requirements the hazard level 3 shall be taken in account.

4.2.7.2.2.5. Maintenance of the fire protection measures

The condition of fire integrity and thermal insulation measures (e.g. floor protection, wheel spark protection)
shall be checked every overhaul period and at intermediate periods where it is appropriate to the design
solution and field experience.

4.2.7.3.

Electrical protection

4.2.7.3.1.

General

All the metallic parts of a freight wagon that are at risk from excessive contact voltages or being at risk of
causing accidents caused by electrical charges of any origin, shall be held at the same voltage as the rail.

4.2.7.3.2.

Functional and technical specifications

4.2.7.3.2.1. Freight wagon bonding

The electrical resistance between the metallic parts and the rail shall not exceed 0,15 ohm.

These values shall be measured using 50 A direct current.

When materials that are poor conductors do not enable the above values to be reached, the vehicles themselves
shall be fitted with the following protective bonding connections:

— The body shall be connected to the frame at least two different points;

— The frame shall be connected to each bogie at least once.

Each bogie shall be bonded reliably by means of at least one axle box;. If there are no bogies, no bonding
connections are needed.

Each bonding connection shall be made of a flexible and non corrodible or corrosion protected material and
have a minimum cross section according to the materials used (the reference is 35 mm2 for copper).

Particularly restrictive conditions, from the point of view of eliminating risks, shall be taken in the case of
special vehicles, for example roofless vehicles occupied by passengers in their own cars, vehicles used to
transport dangerous good (listed in the directive 96/49 EC and its valid Annex RID.).

4.2.7.3.2.2. Freight wagon electrical equipment bonding

Freight wagons fitted with electrical equipment shall have sufficient protection against electric shocks.
Where there is an electrical installation on the freight wagon, any metallic parts of the electrical equipment
liable to be touched by people shall be reliably bonded, if the standard voltage to which they may be subjected
is higher than:

— 50 V dc

— 24 Vac

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/61

— 24 V between phases when the neutral point is not bonded

— 42 V between phases when the neutral point is bonded.

The cross-section of the bonding cable will depend on the current in the electrical installation, but shall be of a
suitable size to ensure reliable operation of the circuit protect devices, in the event of a fault.

Any aerials fitted outside the freight wagons shall be completely protected from the voltage of the catenary or
3rd rail and the system shall form an electrical single unit bonded at one single point. An antenna fitted outside
of the freight wagon that does not conform to the previous conditions, shall be isolated.

4.2.7.4.

Fixing of tail lamps

4.2.7.4.1.

General

All hauled vehicles shall have two tail lamp brackets at each end

4.2.7.4.2.

Functional and technical specifications

4.2.7.4.2.1. Characteristics

The tail lamp bracket shall have a fixing slot, as defined in Annex BB fig. BB1.

4.2.7.4.2.2. Position

At the vehicle ends, the tail lamp brackets shall be arranged in such a way that:

— they are placed, wherever possible, between the buffers and the corners of the vehicles;

— they are spaced more than 1 300 mm apart;

— the main centre line of the slot is perpendicular to the main centre line of the wagon;

— the upper side of the tail lamp bracket is less than 1 600 mm above rail level. Where vehicles are fitted
with fixed electric tail lamps, the centre line of the tail lamp shall be less than 1 800 mm above rail level;

— the overall gauge of the tail lamp, as laid down in Annex BB fig. BB2, is complied with.

The tail lamp brackets shall be located in such a position that the lamp, when fitted, is not obscured and is
easily accessible.

4.2.7.5.

Provisions for the hydraulic/pneumatic equipment of freight wagons

4.2.7.5.1.

General

Hydraulic and pneumatic equipment shall be so designed by structural strength and using suitable fittings so
that bursting will not occur in normal operation.

Hydraulic systems installed on wagons shall be so designed to avoid any visible signs of leaking of hydraulic
fluid.

4.2.7.5.2.

Functional and technical specifications

Suitable protective measures shall ensure that hydraulic/pneumatic systems are not actuated inadvertently.

For hydraulically or pneumatically operated flaps/slide valves, an indicator shall show that they are properly
locked.

4.2.8.

MAINTENANCE: MAINTENANCE FILE

All maintenance activities undertaken on Rolling Stock must be performed in accordance with the provisions
of this TSI.

L 344/62

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

All maintenance shall be undertaken in accordance with the Maintenance File applicable to the Rolling Stock.

The Maintenance File must be managed in accordance with the provisions specified in this TSI.

After delivery of the rolling stock by the supplier, and acceptance thereof, a single entity shall assume
responsibility for the maintenance of the rolling stock and management of the Maintenance File.

The Rolling Stock Register, kept by each Member State, shall state the entity responsible for the maintenance of
the Rolling Stock and the management of the Maintenance File.

4.2.8.1.

Definition, contents and criteria of the Maintenance File

4.2.8.1.1.1. Maintenance File

The maintenance file shall be supplied with the vehicle, which is submitted to the verification process as
specified in section 6.2.2.3 of this TSI, before putting into service.

The present article gives the criteria to verify the maintenance file.

The maintenance file is composed of:

— The Maintenance Design Justification File.

The Maintenance Design Justification File describes the methods used to design the maintenance;
describes the tests, investigations, calculations carried out; gives the relevant data used for this purpose
and justifies their origin.

This file shall contain:

— Description of the organisation in charge of the design of the maintenance

— Precedents, principles and methods used to design the maintenance of the vehicle.

— Utilisation profile (Limits of the normal utilisation of the vehicle (km/month, climatic limits,

authorised types of loads…) taken into account for the design of the maintenance).

— Tests, investigations, calculations carried out.

— Relevant data used to design the maintenance and origin of these data (return of experience,

tests…).

— Responsibility and traceability of the design process (name, skills and position of the author and

approver of each document).

— The Maintenance Documentation.

The Maintenance Documentation consists of all the documents necessary to realise the management and
execution of the maintenance of the vehicle.

The maintenance documentation is composed of the following;

— Organic/functional description (breakdown structure).

The breakdown structure sets up the borders of the freight wagon by listing all the items belonging
to the structure of that freight wagon and using an appropriate number of discrete levels to
distinguish the relationships existing between different areas of the rolling stock. The last item
identified along a branch shall be a Replaceable Unit.

— Parts List.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/63

Containing the technical descriptions of the spare parts (replaceable units) in order to allow
identification and procurement of the correct spares.

— Safety/interoperability-relevant limits.

For the safety/interoperability relevant components or parts,
measurable limits not to be exceeded in service (to include operation in degraded mode).

this document shall give the

— Legal obligations.

Some components or systems are subject to legal obligations (for instance brakes reservoirs,
dangerous goods tanks …). These obligations shall be listed.

— Maintenance plan

— List, schedule and criteria of planned preventative maintenance operations,

— List and criteria of conditional preventative maintenance operations,

— List of corrective maintenance operations,

— Maintenance operations governed by specific conditions of use.

The level of the maintenance operations shall be described. Also maintenance tasks to be
carried out by the Railway Undertaking (servicing, inspections, brake tests, etc…) shall be
described.

Note: Some maintenance operations like overhauls (level 4) and refurbishment, transforma-
tion or very heavy repairs (level 5) may not be defined at the moment when the vehicle is put
into service. In this case, the responsibility and the procedures to define such maintenance
operations shall be described.-

— Maintenance manuals and leaflets

For each maintenance operation listed in the maintenance plan, the manual explains the list of the
tasks to be carried out.

Some maintenance tasks may be common to different operations or common to different vehicles.
These tasks are explained in specific maintenance leaflets.

The manuals and leaflets shall contain the following information:

— Specific tools and facilities

— Standardised or statutory specific staff competencies required (welding, non destructive

testing…)

— General requirements relative to Mechanical, Electrical, Fabrication and other engineering

competencies.

— Occupational and Operational Health and Safety provisions (including, but not limited to
applicable legislation appertaining to the controlled use of substances hazardous to health
and safety).

— Environmental provisions

— Details of the task to be carried out as a minimum:

— Disassembly/assembly instructions

— Maintenance criteria

L 344/64

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

— Checks and tests

— Parts required to undertake the task

— Consumables required to undertake the task

— Tests and procedures to be undertaken after each maintenance operation before putting into

service.

— Traceability and Records.

— Troubleshooting (fault diagnosis) manual

Including functional and schematic diagrams of the systems.

4.2.8.1.2. Management of the Maintenance File.

In the case where Railway Undertakings carry out maintenance on the Rolling Stock they use, the Railway
Undertaking shall ensure processes are in place to manage the maintenance and operational integrity of the
Rolling Stock, including:

— Information in the Rolling Stock Register,

— Asset Management, including records of all Maintenance undertaken and due on the Rolling Stock (which

shall be subject to specified time periods for differing levels of archive storage).

— Software where relevant.

— Procedures for the receipt and processing of specific information related to the operational integrity of
Rolling Stock, arising as a result from any circumstance including but not limited to operational or
Maintenance incidents, that have a potential to affect the safety integrity of Rolling Stock.

— Procedures for the identification, generation and dissemination of specific information related to the
operational integrity of Rolling Stock, arising as a result from any circumstance including but not limited
to operational or Maintenance incidents, with a potential to affect the safety integrity of Rolling Stock,
and which is identified during any Maintenance activity.

— Operational duty profiles of Rolling Stock. (including, but not limited to Tonne kilometres and total

kilometres).

— Processes for the protection and validation of such systems.

In accordance with the provisions of Directive 2004/49 Annex III, the Safety Management System of the
Railway Undertaking must demonstrate that suitable maintenance arrangements are in place, thereby ensuring
on-going compliance with the essential requirements and the requirements of
including the
requirements of the Maintenance File.

this TSI

In the case of entities other than the Railway Undertaking using the Rolling Stock being responsible for the
maintenance of the Rolling Stock used, the Railway Undertaking using the Rolling Stock must ascertain that all
relevant maintenance processes are in place and are actually applied. This must also be suitably demonstrated
within the Safety Management System of the Railway Undertaking.

The entity responsible for the maintenance of the wagon shall ensure that reliable information about
maintenance processes and data specified to be made available in the TSIs are available for the operating RU,
and demonstrate on request of the operating RU that these processes ensure the compliance of the wagon with
the Essential Requirements of Directive 2001/16/EC as modified by Directive 2004/50/EC.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/65

4.3.

FUNCTIONAL AND TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS OF THE INTERFACES

4.3.1.

GENERAL

In the light of the essential requirements in Section 3, the functional and technical specifications of the
interfaces are arranged by subsystem in the following order:

— Control and command and signalling subsystem

— Traffic operation and management subsystem

— Telematics applications for freight services subsystem

— Infrastructure subsystem

— Energy subsystem.

An additional interface has been identified with the following Council Directive:

— The Council Directive 96/49/EC and its Annex (RID)

An interface also exists with the Conventional Rail Noise TSI.

For each of these interfaces, the specifications are arranged in the same order as in Section 4.2, as follows:

— Structures and mechanical parts

— Vehicle track interaction and gauging

— Braking

— Communication

— Environmental conditions

— System protection

— Maintenance

The following list is endorsed to indicate which subsystems are identified as having an interface basic
parameters of this TSI: Structures and mechanical parts (section 4.2.2):

Interface (e. g. Coupling) between vehicles, between set of Vehicles and between trains (section 4.2.2.1): Traffic
operation and management subsystem and Infrastructure subsystem

Safe access and egress for rolling stock (section 4.2.2.2): Traffic operation and management subsystem

Strength of Main Vehicle Structure (section 4.2.2.3.1): Infrastructure subsystem

Service (fatigue) Loads (section 4.2.2.3.3): No interfaces identified.

Stiffness of the main vehicle structure (section 4.2.2.3.4): No interfaces identified.

Securing of Freight (section 4.2.2.3.5): Traffic operation and management subsystem

Doors closing and locking (section 4.2.2.4): No interfaces identified

Marking of freight wagons (section 4.2.2.5): Traffic operation and management subsystem

Dangerous goods (section 4.2.2.6): Traffic operation and management subsystem and The Council Directive 96/49/
EC and its Annex RID

L 344/66

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Vehicle track interaction and gauging (section 4.2.3):

Kinematic gauge (section 4.2.3.1): Infrastructure subsystem

Static axle load, dynamic wheel load and linear load (section 4.2.3.2) (Control command and signalling subsystem
and Infrastructure subsystem)

Rolling stock parameters, which influence ground based train monitoring systems (section 4.2.3.3): Control
command and signalling subsystem

Vehicle dynamic behaviour (section 4.2.3.4) (Infrastructure subsystem)

Longitudinal compressive forces (section 4.2.3.5): Traffic operation and management subsystem and Infrastructure
subsystem

Braking (section 4.2.4):

Braking performance section 4.2.4.1: Control command and signalling subsystem and Traffic operation and
management subsystem

Communication (section 4.2.5):

Vehicle capability to transmit information from vehicle to vehicle (section 4.2.5.1): Not yet applicable to freight
wagons

Vehicle capability to transmit information between ground and vehicle (section 4.2.5.2): No interfaces identified

Environmental conditions (section 4.2.6)

Environmental conditions (section 4.2.6.1): Traffic operation and management subsystem and Infrastructure
subsystem

Aerodynamic effects (section 4.2.6.2): Traffic operation and management subsystem

Cross winds (section 4.2.6.2): Traffic operation and management subsystem

System protection (section 4.2.7):

Emergency Measures (section 4.2.7.1): Traffic operation and management subsystem

Fire safety (section 4.2.7.2): Infrastructure subsystem

Electrical protection (section 4.2.7.3): No interfaces identified

Maintenance

Maintenance file (section 4.2.8):Traffic operation and management subsystem and Noise TSI

4.3.2.

CONTROL AND COMMAND AND SIGNALLING SUBSYSTEM –

4.3.2.1.

Static axle load, dynamic wheel load and linear load (section 4.2.3.2)

Section 4.2.3.2 of this TSI specifies the minimum axle loads. The corresponding specifications are laid down in
the Control and Command and Signalling TSI Annex A Appendix 1 section 3.1.

The Control and Command and Signalling TSI specifies the maximum axle distance in order to satisfy the
requirement for track circuits. The corresponding specifications are laid down in the Control and Command
and Signalling TSI Annex A Appendix 1 section 2.1.

4.3.2.2.

Wheels

Wheels are specified in section 5.4.2.3. The corresponding specifications are laid down in the Control and
Command and Signalling TSI section 4.2.11.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/67

4.3.2.3.

Rolling stock parameters which influence ground based train monitoring systems

— Hot axle box detectors (see section 4.2.3.3.2) (To be specified at the next revision of this TSI.). The
corresponding specification is laid down in the Control and Command and Signalling TSI section 4.2.10.

— Electrical detection of the wheelset (section 4.2.3.3.1). Requirements for electrical detection of the
wheelset are described in the Control and Command and Signalling TSI Annex A Appendix 1
section 3.5.

— Rolling Stock compatibility with Train Detection Systems

The corresponding specifications are laid down in the Control and Command and Signalling TSI
section 4.2.11.

4.3.2.4.

Braking

4.3.2.4.1.

Braking performance

The Control Command and Signalling TSI Annex A index 4 might specify the maximum number of steps of
the deceleration curve (see 4.2.4.1.2.2 b)).

4.3.3.

TRAFFIC OPERATION AND MANAGEMENT SUBSYSTEM

Interfaces to the traffic and operation management subsystem are in consideration (references to this TSI are
open points).

4.3.3.1.

Interface between vehicles, between sets of vehicles and between trains

The Traffic Operation and Management TSI or national operating rules for shunting, specify shunting speeds in
accordance with the energy absorption capability of the buffers specified in section 4.2.

The Traffic Operation and Management TSI specifies the maximum train mass considering the geographical
conditions in accordance with the strength of the coupler specified in section 4.2.

4.3.3.2.

Doors closing and locking

No interface.

4.3.3.3.

Securing of freight

— Loading rules are required to specify how freight wagons are to be loaded, taking account of the way the

freight wagon has been designed to carry particular goods.

4.3.3.4.

Marking of freight wagons.

The Traffic Operation and Management TSI determines the specifications related to vehicle numbering.

4.3.3.5.

Dangerous goods

The traffic operation and management subsystem TSI shall specify that when freight wagons carrying
dangerous goods are included in a train consist, the train configuration shall comply with the requirements of
the Council Directive 96/49/EC and its Annex in their valid version.

4.3.3.6.

Longitudinal compressive forces

With respect to longitudinal compressive forces, the TSI Traffic and Operation Management Subsystem
determines operational requirements for:

— driving trains

— drivers handling of trains including braking in various line conditions

— banking and shunting of trains due to lines and network

— coupling and handling special types of vehicles (Road-Railer™, Kombirail) in trains

— locomotives distributed in the train

L 344/68

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

4.3.3.7.

Braking performance

The method of calculating the deceleration profile for a new wagon is described in this TSI by using its
technical vehicle parameters.

The method of calculating braking power of a train under service conditions will be described in the Traffic
Operation and Management TSI.

The traffic operation and management TSI will define rules for dealing with the following subjects:

— Marshalling of trains

— Deactivating the brake, releasing the brake and selecting the brake-mode

— Communicating to the train crew and ground staff the means and conditions for parking of wagons.

— Reducing speed according to actual adhesion conditions on a line

— Making available scotches beside the tracks where it is necessary. The freight wagons shall not be required

to carry scotches.

— Dealing with degraded mode, especially for short trains

— Testing the brake (operational inspection)

— Isolating the brake of a wagon with excessive deceleration rate compared to the remainder of the train.

4.3.3.8.

Communication

No interface.

4.3.3.8.1.

Vehicle Capability to transmit information between ground and vehicle

No interface.

4.3.3.9.

Environmental Conditions

When a limit of the climactic conditions defined in section 4.2.6.1.2 of this TSI is exceeded, the system is in a
degraded mode. In this case operational restrictions shall be considered and information given to the Railway
Undertaking or train driver. Regarding temperature the rolling stock register and infrastructure register give the
values for normal operation.

4.3.3.10.

Aerodynamic effects

To be specified at the next revision of this TSI.

4.3.3.11.

Cross winds

To be specified at the next revision of this TSI.

4.3.3.12.

Emergency Measures

The Traffic Operation and Management TSI will specify that emergency arrangements and rescue plans shall be
set up. The associated instructions shall include details of how to re-rail vehicles, and procedures to make
damaged vehicles safe for movement. Railway undertakings shall also consider how their own staff and the staff
of the civil emergency authorities are to be trained, including practical simulation exercises.

The Instructions for dealing with emergency situations shall take account of the risks to which the emergency
response staff may be exposed, and give details of how those risks are to be managed. Details of risks arising
from the design of the Freight Wagon and advice on how to mitigate such risks shall be given to the Railway
Undertaking to enable comprehensive instructions to be written, by or on behalf of the freight wagon designer
or builder.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/69

These instructions shall also include a list of parameters that need to be checked on damaged or derailed freight
wagons in a degraded situation.

4.3.3.13.

Fire Safety

Information to the drivers from the Infrastruc-
ture manager

Provide rules and rescue plan for operation in case of
fire.

4.3.4.

TELEMATICS APPLICATIONS FOR FREIGHT SERVICES SUBSYSTEM

There are no interfaces between the two subsystems.

4.3.5.

INFRASTRUCTURE SUBSYSTEM

To be specified at a later stage, once the infrastructure subsystem TSI is available.

4.3.5.1.

Interface between vehicles, between sets of vehicles and between trains

4.3.5.2.

Strength of Main Vehicle Structure and Securing of Freight

4.3.5.3.

Kinematic gauge

4.3.5.4.

Static axle load, dynamic wheel load and linear load

4.3.5.5.

Vehicle dynamic behaviour

4.3.5.6.

Longitudinal compressive forces

4.3.5.7.

Environmental Conditions

4.3.5.8.

Fire protection

4.3.6.

ENERGY SUBSYSTEM

There are no interfaces between the two subsystems.

4.3.7.

THE COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 96/49/EC AND ITS ANNEX (RID).

4.3.7.1.

Dangerous goods

All special regulations concerning the transport of dangerous goods are fixed in the Council Directive
96/49/EC and its Annex (RID) in their valid version. All derogations, restrictions and exemptions are also listed
in section II of the Council Directive 96/49/EC in its valid version.

4.3.8.

CONVENTIONAL RAIL NOISE TSI

To ensure ongoing adherence to the levels set in the Conventional Rail Noise TSI (see its section 4.5), wagons
shall be appropriately maintained.

The Maintenance File defined in section 4.2.8 shall include the relevant measures to deal with wheel tread
defects.

4.4.

OPERATING RULES

For TRIV wagon the environmental conditions (see § 4.2.6.1 of the TSI) low temperatures (-25 oC to –40 oC)
and/or conditions of snow/ice shall be taken carefully into account in the design phase of rolling stock. Even if
this is done, a lower level of functionality sometimes has to be accepted and managed during operation. This
shall be compensated for by the use of operational procedures to ensure the same overall safety level. It is also
important that operators have the necessary qualifications or skills for operating under those conditions.

L 344/70

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

4.5.

MAINTENANCE RULES

In light of the essential requirements in Section 3, the maintenance rules specific to the rolling stock freight
wagon subsystem concerned by this TSI are described in subsections:

— 4.2.2.2 Safe access and egress for rolling stock

— 4.2.2.3 Strength of main vehicle structure and securing of freight

— 4.2.2.4 Doors closing and locking

— 4.2.2.6 Dangerous goods

— 4.2.3.1 Kinematic gauge

— 4.2.3.4 Vehicle dynamic behaviour

— 4.2.3.4.2.3 Maintenance rules

— 4.2.3.5 Longitudinal compressive forces

— 4.2.5.2 Vehicle capability to transmit information between ground and vehicle

— 4.2.7.2 Fire safety

and in particular in subsection

— 4.2.8 Maintenance.

The maintenance rules shall be such as to enable the wagon to pass the assessment criteria specified in
Section 6 throughout its lifetime.

The party responsible for the management of the maintenance file as defined in Section 4.2.8 shall define the
tolerances and intervals appropriately to ensure ongoing compliance. It is also responsible for deciding the in-
service values when not specified in this TSI.

This means the assessment procedures described in Chapter 6 of this TSI shall be fulfilled for type approval, and
are not necessarily appropriate for maintenance. Not all tests may be made at every maintenance event and
those that are may be subject to wider tolerances.

The combination of the above assures continuous compliance with the essential requirements through the life
of the vehicle.

4.6.

PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS

The professional qualifications required for the operation of the Conventional Rail Rolling Stock subsystem
will be covered by the TSI Traffic Operation and Management.

The competence requirements for the maintenance of the Conventional Rail Rolling Stock subsystem shall be
detailed in the maintenance plan (see section 4.2.8). As activities related to maintenance level 1 are not in the
scope of this TSI, but in the one of the TSI Traffic Operation and Management, professional qualifications
associated with these activities are not specified in this TSI Rolling Stock.

4.7.

HEALTH AND SAFETY CONDITIONS

Apart from requirements specified in the maintenance plan (see section 4.2.8) in this TSI, there are no
additional requirements to applicable European regulations and existing national regulations compatible with
European ones on health and safety for maintenance or operations staff.

Activities related to maintenance level 1 are not in the scope of this TSI, but in the TSI Traffic Operation and
Management. Health and safety conditions at work associated with these activities are not specified in this TSI
Rolling Stock.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/71

4.8.

INFRASTRUCTURE AND ROLLING STOCK REGISTERS

4.8.1.

INFRASTRUCTURE REGISTER

The Infrastructure Register shall contain the following mandatory data as listed in Annex KK.

The requirements for the conventional rail infrastructure register content with regard to the subsystem Rolling
Stock are specified in subsection 4.2.6.1 (environmental conditions). The infrastructure manager is responsible
for the correctness of the data provided for inclusion in the infrastructure register.

4.8.2.

ROLLING STOCK REGISTER

The Rolling Stock Register shall contain the following mandatory data for all freight wagons, which are in
accordance with this TSI as listed in Annex H.

If the Member State of registration changes, the contents of the Rolling Stock Register for that wagon shall be
passed from the original State of registration to the new State of registration.

The data contained in the Rolling Stock Register is required by:

— The Member State to confirm that the freight wagon meets the requirements in accordance with this TSI

— The Infrastructure Manager to confirm that the freight wagon is compatible with the infrastructure over

which it is intended to operate

— The Railway Undertaking to confirm that the freight wagon is suitable for its traffic requirements.

In the territory of all Member States, the requirements applicable in neighbouring third countries are applied to
freight wagons arriving from or going to these third countries, subject to the additional requirements which
define minimum criteria of the interfaces between the freight wagons and the infrastructure and the interfaces
of these freight wagons to locomotives.

Where the data which is available concerning these freight wagons is less than required for the Rolling Stock
Register, the Railway Undertaking shall put in place arrangements to ensure that the vehicles are safe to operate
on the TSI-compliant infrastructure.

5.

5.1.

INTEROPERABILITY CONSTITUENTS

DEFINITION

According to Article 2(d) of Directive 2001/16/EC:

Interoperability constituents are “any elementary component, group of components, subassembly or complete
assembly of equipment incorporated or intended to be incorporated into a subsystem upon which the
interoperability of the trans-European conventional rail system depends directly or indirectly. The concept of a
constituent covers both tangible objects and intangible objects such as software”.

Interoperability constituents described in section 5.3 are constituents, whose technology, design, material,
manufacturing and assessment processes are defined and enable their specification and assessment.

5.2.

INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS

As announced in section 4.1 of this TSI, innovative solutions may require new specification and/or new
assessment methods. These specifications and assessment methods shall be developed by the process described
in sections 6.1.2.3 (and 6.2.2.2).

L 344/72

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

5.3.

LIST OF CONSTITUENTS

The interoperability constituents are covered by the relevant provisions of Directive 2001/16/EC and are listed
below.

5.3.1.

STRUCTURES AND MECHANICAL PARTS

5.3.1.1.

Buffers

5.3.1.2.

Draw gear

5.3.1.3.

Decals for Markings

5.3.2.

VEHICLE TRACK INTERACTION AND GAUGING

5.3.2.1.

Bogie and Running Gear

5.3.2.2.

Wheelsets

5.3.2.3.

Wheels

5.3.2.4.

Axles

5.3.3.

BRAKING

5.3.3.1.

Distributor

5.3.3.2.

Relay valve for variable load/Automatic empty-load change over brake

5.3.3.3.

Wheel slide protection device

5.3.3.4.

Slack adjuster

5.3.3.5.

Brake cylinder/actuator

5.3.3.6.

Pneumatic half coupling

5.3.3.7.

End Cock

5.3.3.8.

Isolating device for distributor

5.3.3.9.

Brake pad

5.3.3.10.

Brake blocks

5.3.3.11.

Brake Pipe Emptying Accelerator valve

5.3.3.12.

Automatic load sensing & empty/load changeover device

5.3.4.

COMMUNICATION

5.3.5.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS

5.3.6.

SYSTEM PROTECTION

5.4.

CONSTITUENTS PERFORMANCES AND SPECIFICATIONS

5.4.1.

STRUCTURES AND MECHANICAL PARTS

5.4.1.1.

Buffers

The specifications of the interoperability constituent buffers are described in section 4.2.2.1.2.1 buffers,
paragraph “buffer characteristics”.

The interfaces of the interoperability constituents “buffers” are described in 4.3.3.1 for traffic operation and
management and in 4.3.5.1 for infrastructure.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/73

5.4.1.2.

Draw Gear

The specifications of the interoperability constituent draw gear are described in section 4.2.2.1.2.2 draw gear,
paragraph “draw gear characteristics” and section 4.2.2.1.2.3 interaction of draw- and buffing-gear, paragraph
“draw gear and buffing gear characteristics”.

The interfaces of the interoperability constituents draw gear are described in 4.3.3.1 for traffic operation and
management and in 4.3.5.1 for infrastructure.

5.4.1.3.

Decals for Markings

Where markings are achieved by using decals, these are Interoperability Constituents. These markings are
specified in Annex B

5.4.2.

VEHICLE TRACK INTERACTION AND GAUGING

5.4.2.1.

Bogie and Running Gear

The integrity of the structure of the bogie and running gear is important for the safe operation of the railway
system.

The loading environment of the bogie and running gear is determined by

— the maximum speed

— static track features (alignment, track gauge, cant, rail inclination, track irregularities)

— dynamic track features (horizontal and vertical track stiffness and track damping)

— wheel/rail contact parameters (Wheel and rail profile, track gauge)

— wheel defects (e.g. wheel flats, out of roundness)

— mass, inertia and stiffness of car body, bogies and wheelsets

— suspension characteristic of the vehicles

— distribution of the payload

— braking performance.

The specifications of the interoperability constituents bogie and running gear are described in 4.2.3.4.1,
4.2.3.4.2.1 and 4.2.3.4.2.2 Vehicle Track Interaction and Gauging.

It is permissible for bogies to be used in other application without further validation (testing) provided the
range of applicable parameters in the new application (including those of the vehicle body) remain within the
range already proved.

In order to ensure safe operation of the bogies and running gear, they shall be designed to withstand the
loading environment expected during their operation. In particular, the bogies and running gear shall be
compliant with the test conditions detailed in section 6.

The list containing bogie designs that at the time of publication are already considered to meet the
requirements of this TSI for some applications is attached in Annex Y.

The Interfaces of the interoperability constituent bogie and running gear with the subsystem Control and
Command and Signalling relative to the spacing of the axles are described in 4.3.2.1 Static axle load, dynamic
wheel load and linear load.

Freight wagons shall be designed such that operating through curves, on ramps and with access on ferry boats
is possible without contact between bogies and car body. The side bearers of the bogie wagons shall have
sufficient overlap in the smallest curve radius for which the wagon has been designed. If the wagon is only
capable of operating on a smaller ferry boat angle than 2,5 degrees, then the marking according to Annex B,
Fig. B 25, shall be applied. If the wagon is only capable of operating on a bigger curve radius than 35 m, then
the marking according to Annex B, Fig. B 24, shall be applied.

L 344/74

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

5.4.2.2.

Wheelsets

Track Interaction and Gauging 4.2.4.1.2.5 Braking and 4.2.7.3.2.1 System protection.

The detailed specification is described in section 4.2.3.3.1 Electrical resistance, in section 4.2.4.1.2.5 energy
limits (in braking) in Annex K and in Annex E, which includes example solutions in some elements.

A complete functional specification of the IC wheelset is deferred until the next revision of this TSI

The Interfaces of the interoperability constituent wheelset with the subsystem Control and Command and
Signalling are described in 4.3.2.1 Static axle load, dynamic wheel load and linear load.

5.4.2.3.

Wheels

The detailed specification is described in Annex L, which includes example solutions in some elements and
Annex E.

A complete functional specification of the IC wheel is deferred until the next revision of this TSI.

The Interfaces of the interoperability constituent wheel with the subsystem Control and Command and
Signalling are described in 4.3.2.1 Static axle load, dynamic wheel load and linear load.

5.4.2.4.

Axles

The detailed specification is described in Annex M, which includes example solutions in some elements.

A complete functional specification of the IC axles is deferred until the next revision of this TSI.

The Interfaces of the interoperability constituent axle wheelset with the subsystem Control and Command and
Signalling are described in 4.3.2.1 Static axle load, dynamic wheel load and linear load.

5.4.3.

BRAKING

5.4.3.1.

Constituents approved at the time of publication of this TSI

The list containing brake system and brake constituent designs that at the time of publication are already
considered to meet the requirements of this TSI for some applications is attached in Annex FF.

5.4.3.2.

Distributor

The functional specification of the interoperability constituent distributor is described in 4.2.4.1.2.2 Braking
Performance Elements and 4.2.4.1.2.7 Air Supply.

The interfaces of the interoperability constituent are described in Annex I section I.1.

5.4.3.3.

Relay valve for variable load/Automatic empty-load change over brake

The functional specification of the interoperability constituent relay valve for variable load/Automatic empty/
load changeover brake is described in 4.2.4.1.2.2 Braking Performance Elements and 4.2.4.1.2.7 Air Supply.

The interfaces of the interoperability constituent is are described in Annex I section I.2.

5.4.3.4.

Wheel slide protection device

The functional specification of the interoperability constituent wheel slide protection device is described in
4.2.4.1.2.6 wheel slide protection and 4.2.4.1.2.7 Air Supply.

The specification of the interoperability constituent is described in Annex I section I.3.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/75

5.4.3.5.

Slack adjuster

The functional specification of the interoperability constituent slack adjuster is described in 4.2.4.1.2.3
Mechanical Components.

The specification of the interoperability constituent is described in Annex I section I.4.

5.4.3.6.

Brake cylinder/actuator

the interoperability constituent brake cylinder/actuator is described in
The functional specification of
4.2.4.1.2.2 Braking Performance Elements, 4.2.4.1.2.8 Parking Brake, 4.2.4.1.2.5 Energy Limits and 4.2.4.1.2.7
Air Supply.

The specification of the interoperability constituent is described in Annex I section I.5.

5.4.3.7.

Pneumatic half coupling

The specification of the interoperability constituent is described in Annex I section I.6.

5.4.3.8.

End Cock

The specification of the interoperability constituent is described in Annex I section I.7

5.4.3.9.

Isolating device for distributor

The specification of the interoperability constituent is described in Annex I section I.8

5.4.3.10.

Brake pad

The specification of the interoperability constituent is described in Annex I section I.9

5.4.3.11.

Brake blocks

The specification of the interoperability constituent is described in Annex I section I.10

5.4.3.12.

Brake Pipe Emptying Accelerator valve

The specification of the interoperability constituent is described in Annex I section I.11

5.4.3.13.

Automatic load sensing & empty/load changeover device

The specification of the interoperability constituent is described in Annex I section I.12

6.

ASSESSMENT OF CONFORMITY AND/OR SUITABILITY FOR USE OF THE CONSTITUENTS AND
VERIFICATION OF THE SUBSYSTEM

6.1.

INTEROPERABILITY CONSTITUENTS

6.1.1.

ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES

The assessment procedure for conformity or suitability for use of interoperability constituents shall be based on
European specifications or specifications approved in accordance with Directive 2001/16/EC.

In the case of suitability for use, these specifications will indicate all the parameters to be measured, monitored
or observed, and will describe the related testing methods and measuring procedures, whether in a test-bench
simulation or tests in a real railway environment.

The manufacturer of an Interoperability Constituent (IC) or his authorised representative established within the
Community shall draw up an EC declaration of conformity or an EC declaration of suitability for use in
accordance with Article 13.1 and Annex IV of the Directive 2001/16/EC before placing ICs on the market.

The assessment procedures for conformity of ICs defined in Section 5 of this TSI shall be carried out by
application of modules as specified in Section 6.1.2

L 344/76

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Assessment of conformity or suitability for use of an IC shall be carried out by a notified body, when indicated
in the procedure, with which the manufacturer or its authorised representative in the Community has lodged
the application

The modules shall be combined and used selectively according to the particular constituent.

The modules are defined in Annex Q of this TSI.

The phases for the application of the conformity and suitability for use assessment procedures for the
interoperability constituents as defined in Section 5 of this TSI are indicated in Annex Q, Table Q.1 to this TSI.

6.1.2.

MODULES

6.1.2.1.

General

For the conformity assessment procedure of interoperability constituents within the rolling stock subsystem,
the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community may choose:

a)

the type-examination procedure (module B) for the design and development phase in combination with a
module for the production phase: either the production quality management system procedure (module
D), or the product verification procedure (module F),

or alternatively

b)

or

c)

the full quality management system with design examination procedure (module H2) for all phases,

the full quality management system procedure (module H1)

Module D may only be chosen where the manufacturer operates a quality system for production, final product
inspection and testing approved and surveyed by a notified body of its choice. Assessment of welding processes
shall be carried out according to national rules.

Module H1 or H2 may only be chosen where the manufacturer operates a quality system for design,
production, final product inspection and testing, approved and surveyed by a notified body of its choice.

The conformity assessment shall cover the phases and characteristics as indicated by “X” in the Table Q1 of
Annex Q to this TSI.

6.1.2.2.

Existing solutions for Interoperability Constituents

If a existing solution for an interoperability constituent is already on the European market before this TSI enters
into force, then the following process applies.

The manufacturer shall demonstrate that tests and verification of ICs have been considered successful for
previous applications under comparable conditions. In this case these assessments shall remain valid in the new
application.

In this case, the type can be considered as already approved and an assessment of the type is not necessary.

In accordance with assessment procedures for the different
representative established within the Community shall:

ICs,

the manufacturer or its authorised

— either apply the internal production control procedure (module A),

— or apply the internal design control with production verification procedure (module A1),

— or apply the full quality management system procedure (module H1).

If it is not possible to demonstrate that the solution is positively proven in the past, the Section 6.1.2.1 applies.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/77

6.1.2.3.

Innovative solutions for Interoperability Constituents

When a solution proposed to be an Interoperability Constituent is innovative, as defined in the section 5.2, the
manufacturer shall state the deviation from the relevant section of the TSI. The European Railway Agency shall
finalise the appropriate functional and interface specifications of the constituents and develop the assessment
methods.

The appropriate functional and interface specifications and the assessment methods shall be incorporated in
the TSI by the revision process. As soon as these documents are published, the assessment procedure of the
interoperability constituents may be chosen by the manufacturer or his authorised representative established
within the Community, as specified in the section 6.1.2.1

After entry into force of a decision of the Commission, taken in accordance with Article 21(2) of Directive
2001/16/EC, the innovative solution may be used before being incorporated into the TSI.

6.1.2.4.

Assessment of suitability for use

Whenever an assessment procedure is started based on in-service experience for an interoperability constituent
within the rolling stock subsystem, the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the
Community shall apply the type validation of in service experience procedure (module V).

6.1.3.

SPECIFICATION FOR ASSESSMENT OF ICS

6.1.3.1.

Structures and mechanical parts

6.1.3.1.1.

Buffers

The buffers are to be assessed against the specification contained in section 4.2.2.1.2.1 buffers paragraph buffer
characteristics.

6.1.3.1.2. Draw Gear

The draw gear shall be assessed against the specification contained in section 4.2.2.1.2.2 draw gear, paragraph
“draw gear characteristics” and section 4.2.2.1.2.3 interaction of draw- and buffing-gear, paragraph “draw gear
and buffing gear characteristics”.

6.1.3.1.3. Marking of Freight Wagons

The decals for marking are to be assessed against the specification contained in Annex B

6.1.3.2.

Vehicle track interaction and gauging

6.1.3.2.1.

Bogie and Running Gear

The integrity of the structure of the body to bogie connection, bogie frame, axle-box and all attached
equipment shall be assured. This assurance shall be generated by use of sufficient appropriate methods, such as
demonstration by bench tests, validated modelling, comparison with an existing design approved by or on
behalf of national approval regime, which is used in similar service and condition or other methods.

The test conditions applicable for bogies running on standard gauge track under normal conditions of speed
and track quality are defined in Annex J. They represent only the common part of the full range of tests to be
performed on all types of bogie frames.

It is not possible to specify tests of a general nature for each specific bogie component, in particular for the axle
bearings, the connection between bogie and body, the dampers and the brakes. Such tests shall be drawn up
case by case, using the tests defined above as a guide. The objectives and the parameter definitions of the tests
already specified are detailed below.

This remark also applies to the case of bogie frames intended for service on track with a different gauge, or
under clearly different operating conditions, or bogies with a novel design.

The three tests described in Annex J Sections J1, J2 and J3 have been defined in order to:

— optimise the construction of the bogie frame (weight, speed)

L 344/78

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

— supplement the information obtained from calculations

— ensure that the bogie frames are suitable for withstanding the in-service loads without the occurrence of
permanent deformation or cracks that would reduce safety or result in high maintenance costs.

If there is no comparable solution available, experience has shown that three tests are required: two static tests
(Annex J sections J1 and J2), and one dynamic test (Annex J section J3).

The two static tests shall be performed first; they allow, in particular, for any bogies that do not meet the
minimum strength requirements to be rejected.

The dynamic test (fatigue test) is designed to verify whether the bogie design is sound, and whether fatigue
cracks might be expected to occur in service.

The load values that have been used for the definition of the tests have been derived in particular from running
tests.

The tests in Annex J section J1 are considered to represent the maximum loads that can occur in service,
without taking the loads due to accidents into account.

The tests in Annex J sections J2 and J3 are considered to represent, on average, the aggregate total of variable
loads occurring during the bogie service life.

The number of cycles in the fatigue test was selected to simulate an overall service life of 30 years at a rate of
100 000 km per year. If this is not representative of the intended life cycle, the load cases shall be revised.

The distribution of these cycles over three distinct load stages was done with a view to optimising bogie frame
structures. In particular, the possibility of the occurrence of cracks during the last load stage provides a means
to identify the most highly stressed zones, to which special attention shall be paid during manufacture,
production testing and maintenance operations.

To ensure the validity of the tests defined in Annex J sections J1, J2 and J3, particular attention shall be paid to
their practical implementation. In particular: -

For the static tests of Annex J sections J1 and J2, the bogie frames shall be equipped with uni-directional strain
gauges in those locations where stresses occur with a single clearly defined direction; in all other locations tri-
directional strain gauges (rosettes) shall be used.

The active part of these gauges shall not exceed 10 mm.

Strain gauges and strain rosettes are attached to the bogie frame at all highly stressed points, in particular in
zones of stress concentration.

The test set-up shall be defined so as to reproduce the forces acting on the bogie frame, and its deformation, as
they occur in service. Particular attention shall be paid to the transmission of the vertical and transverse loads
that in certain cases are distributed over several elements (e.g. pivot, springs, stops...).

The static tests shall be performed on a complete bogie, equipped with its suspension. In most cases, this
arrangement is not feasible for the fatigue test for practical reasons; a separate study shall be conducted to
define the test set-up.

The bogie frames used for the three tests shall be complete, and equipped with all their connecting elements
(for dampers, brakes, etc.). They shall conform fully to the production drawings, and they shall have been
manufactured under the same conditions as series-produced bogie frames.

If cracks or fractures occur during the fatigue test, originating from manufacturing defects that were not
detected during the preceding static testing of the bogie frame, the test shall be repeated with another frame. If
the defects are confirmed, the design shall be considered as unsatisfactory.

6.1.3.2.2. Wheelsets

The assessment of the wheelset is described in Annex K.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/79

6.1.3.2.3. Wheels

The assessment of the design and of the product is described in Annex L.

6.1.3.2.4. Axle

The assessment of the design and of the product is described in Annex M.

6.1.3.3.

Braking

See Annex P.

6.2.

SUBSYSTEM CONVENTIONAL RAIL ROLLING STOCK FREIGHT WAGONS

6.2.1.

ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES

At the request of the contracting entity or its representative established in the Community, the notified body
carries out EC verification in accordance with annex VI of the Directive 2001/16/EC.

If the contracting entity can demonstrate that tests or verifications related to the Conventional Rail Rolling
Stock Subsystem have been considered successfully for any previous application, these assessments shall be
taken into account in the conformity assessment.

Modified freight wagons changed within the limits given in Annex II shall not require a new conformity
assessment.

The impact of weight change on safety critical components, safety related components, the interaction between
infrastructure and the freight wagon, and on classification for line categories according to 4.2.3.2, must in all
cases be considered.

As far as specified in this TSI, the EC verification of the Conventional Rail Rolling Stock Subsystem shall take
into account its interfaces with other subsystems of the Conventional Rail System.

The contracting entity shall draw up the EC declaration of verification for the Rolling Stock Subsystem in
accordance with Article 18 (1) and Annex V of Directive 2001/16/EC.

6.2.2.

MODULES

6.2.2.1.

General

The Modules to choose for the verification procedures are defined in Annex AA.

For the verification procedure of the requirements of Freight wagons, as specified in section 4, the contracting
entity or its authorised representative established within the Community may chose the following modules:

a)

the Type Examination procedure (module SB) for the design and development phase, in combination
with a module for the production phase either:

— the Production Quality Management System procedure (module SD),

— or the Product Verification (module SF);

or

b)

the Full quality Management System with Design Examination procedure (module SH2).

The module SD may only be chosen where the contracting entity, or the main contractors when involved,
operate a quality management system for manufacture, final production inspection and testing, approved and
surveyed by a Notified Body of his/their choice. Assessment of welding processes shall be carried out according
to national rules.

The module SH2 may only be chosen where the contracting entity, or the main contractors when involved,
operate a quality management system for design, manufacture, final production inspection and testing,
approved and surveyed by a Notified Body of his/their choice.

L 344/80

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

The following additional requirements shall be taken into account for the use of the modules:

— Module SB: with reference to section 4.3 of the module, a design review is requested,

— For the production phase, modules SD, SF and SH2: the application of these Modules shall enable the
conformity of the wagons with the approved type as described in the type examination certificate. In
particular, the application shall demonstrate that the manufacture and the assembly are realised with the
same components and the same technical solutions as the approved type.

6.2.2.2.

Innovative solutions

When a freight wagon includes an innovative solution, as defined in section 4.1, the manufacturer or the
contracting entity shall state the deviation from the relevant section of the TSI.

The European Railway Agency shall finalise the appropriate functional and interface specifications of this
solution and develop the assessment methods.

The appropriate functional and interface specifications and assessment methods shall be incorporated in the
TSI by the revision process. As soon as these documents are published, the assessment procedure for the freight
wagon may be chosen by the manufacturer or the contracting entity or his authorised representative
established within the Community, as specified in the section. 6.2.2.1.

After entry into force of a decision of the Commission, taken in accordance with Article 21(2) of Directive
2001/16/EC, the innovative solution may be used before being incorporated into the TSI.

6.2.2.3.

Assessment of Maintenance

According to article 18.3 of the Directive 2001/16/EC, the Notified Body shall compile the Technical File, which
includes the Maintenance File.

The conformity assessment of maintenance is in the responsibility of each member state concerned. The
Annex DD (which remains an open point) describes the procedure by which each member state ascertains that
maintenance arrangement meet the provisions of this TSI and ensure the respect of the basic parameters and
essential requirements during the subsystem lifetime.

6.2.3.

SPECIFICATIONS FOR ASSESSMENT OF THE SUBSYSTEM

6.2.3.1.

Structures and Mechanical Parts

6.2.3.1.1.

Strength of main vehicle structure and Securing of Freight

Validation of the design shall follow the requirements of Section 6 of EN12663.

The test programme shall include a shunting impact test as defined in Annex Z if no demonstration of
structural integrity by calculation has been performed.

Where tests have previously been carried out on similar components or sub-systems it is not necessary to
repeat the tests, provided a clear safety justification showing the applicability of the earlier tests can be
provided.

6.2.3.2.

Vehicle track interaction and gauging

6.2.3.2.1.

Vehicle dynamic behaviour

6.2.3.2.1.1. Application of the partial type approval procedure

When a wagon has already been type approved, modifications of certain of
its characteristics (see
section 4.2.3.4.1) or of the conditions of its operation that affect its dynamic behaviour may require an
additional test.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/81

6.2.3.2.1.2. Certification of new wagons

When new wagons have to be approved by commissioning tests, these tests shall be done by:

1) measurement of wheel/rail forces

or

2) measurement of accelerations

or

3)

or

4)

validated modelling

comparison with existing vehicles

The precise limit values will vary according to the testing and analysis method used.

6.2.3.2.1.3. Exemptions from dynamic behaviour test for wagons to built or converted to run up to 100km/h or 120km/h

Freight wagons are permitted to run up to 100km/h or 120km/h without having to pass the dynamic
behaviour test if they meet the following conditions defined in

— Longitudinal Compression Forces 4.2.3.5

— Static axle load, dynamic wheel load and linear load 4.2.3.2

and if they are fitted with a suspension or bogie listed below.

Two axle wagons

Freight wagons shall be fitted with type of suspensions listed in Annex Y in the table relating to two axle
wagons.

Wagons with two-axle bogies

The freight wagons shall be fitted with types of bogies or variants provided that the modifications with respect
to the basic type only affect elements that cannot influence the dynamic behaviour. These bogies are listed in
Annex Yin the two tables relating to wagons with two axle bogies.

Wagons with three-axle bogies

The freight wagons shall be fitted with types of bogies or variants provided that the modifications with respect
to the basic type only affect elements, which cannot influence the dynamic behaviour. These bogies are listed in
Annex Yin the table relating to wagons with three axle bogies. .

6.2.3.2.2.

Longitudinal compressive forces for freight wagons with side buffers

When it is necessary to require the certification of the admissible longitudinal compressive force by tests, then
the tests have to be carried out according to the method described in Annex R, at least with the measurement
areas given in this Annex.

6.2.3.2.3. Measuring the freight wagons

Evidence shall be provided by measuring the freight wagon underframes and bogies that deviations from the
nominal dimensions are within the permissible tolerances (EN 13775 part 1 to 3 and prEN 13775 parts 4 to 6).

L 344/82

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

6.2.3.3.

Braking

6.2.3.3.1.

Braking performance

The methods to determine the braking power are described in Annex S.

6.2.3.3.2. Minimum Brake System Testing

The tests and limits below apply to wagons fitted with conventional air brakes for freight trains.

These tests shall be performed only with the single pipe mode (the Brake Pipe). Tests with the auxiliary reservoir
filled permanently from the Main Reservoir Pipe shall also to be carried out to demonstrate that the brake
operation is not adversely affected.

The normal working pressure (regime pressure) of the conventional air brake is 5 bar. These tests shall be
performed at this pressure. Additionally sample tests shall be performed to ensure that the operation of the
brake is not adversely affected, with a decrease or an increase in this working pressure not exceeding 1 bar.

The tests shall be performed in the “P” and “G” brake modes, when fitted. Where variable or empty load braking
systems are fitted, the tests shall be carried out in the “loaded” and “empty” positions to ensure that the
operation of the brake is not adversely affected and is compliant with this TSI.

The use of electricity or other means to control the brake is permitted provided the principles of this TSI are
retained. The equivalent level of safety shall be demonstrated.

Tests listed in the table below are done based on a separate vehicle when stationary or on a stationary train.

Individual Interoperability Constituents have their design and product assessment described within Annex P.

No

Characteristic

Limit Value

Pneumatic Brake Characteristics

1

2

3

4

Fill time of the brake cylinder to 95 % maximum
pressure

P Setting
3-5 seconds (3-6 seconds in the case of an empty/load
system)
G Setting
18-30 seconds

Release time of the brake cylinder to 0,4 bar
pressure

P Setting
15-20 seconds
For a total weight of 70 tonnes or greater,
is
permissible for the release time to be 15 to 25 seconds.
G Setting
45-60 seconds
In the case of brakes with pneumatically-controlled
devices for the variation of the braking power, the
release time is the time which must elapse before a
pressure of 0,4 bar is seen in the relay control chamber
(pilot pressure)

it

Reduction in brake pipe pressure required to
obtain maximum brake cylinder pressure

1,5 ± 0,1 bar

Maximum brake cylinder pressure

3,8 ± 0,1 bar

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/83

No

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

Pneumatic Brake Characteristics

Characteristic

Limit Value

Sensitivity/Insensitivity
The insensitivity of the brake to slow decreases in
brake pipe pressure, shall be such that the brake is
not activated if the normal working pressure
drops by 0,3 bar in one minute.
The sensitivity of the brake to decreases in brake
pipe pressure shall be such that the brake is
activated within 1,2 seconds if the normal
working pressure drops by 0,6 bar in 6 seconds.

Brake does not activate with a 0,3 bar drop in one
minute.
Brake activates within 1,2 seconds with a 0,6 bar drop
in 6 seconds.

Brake pipe leakage from a starting pressure of 5
bar

0,2 bar maximum pressure loss in 5 minutes

Brake cylinder, auxiliary reservoir and control
reservoir leakage from a starting Brake Cylinder
pressure of 3,8 + or — 0,1 bar from a brake pipe
pressure of 0 bar

0,15 bar maximum pressure loss in 5 minutes
measured at the auxiliary reservoir.

Manual release of the automatic air brake.

Brake releases

Graduability in application and release variations
in brake pipe pressure:

Less or equal to 0,1 bar.

Pressure corresponding to the return to the filling
position at the time of brake release

Brake Pipe:
- 0,15 bar below actual running pressure
Brake cylinder:
<0,3 bar

Automatic air brake indicator

Ensure the indicator reflects the brake state — applied
or released

Slack adjuster to be tested by creating an
excessive brake friction pair gap and demon-
strating that repeated application/release cycles
restore correct clearance

Design brake friction pair pad/block clearance

Compliance to design brake pad/block loads

Brake pad/block loads shall comply with design

Brake rigging shall be free to move and allow
brake pads/blocks to clear the brake discs/wheels
in the released state and not reduce application
forces below design

Brake rigging shall be free

Parking brake components shall be free moving
and lubricated if required

Free movement: ensure that it applies and releases
without binding.

Control and Performance of the parking brake
shall be such that with 500 N force applied to the
end of a brake lever or tangentially to a hand
wheel rim, the parking brake is fully applied.

500 N input force

Manual release of the parking brake

Parking Brake releases

Parking brake indicator shall reflect state of brake

Indicator shall accurately show the brake state —
applied or released

Notes on Table above:

N1.

N2.

The timings shall be obtained from an emergency application on a single vehicle. Following inshot to
approximately 10 % of the final brake cylinder pressure, the increase in pressure shall be progressive.
The filling time begins when air commences to fill the cylinder and ends when the pressure reaches
95 % of the final value, and shall be as stated.

At the time of full and continuous release of the brake on a separate vehicle following an emergency
application, the pressure in the brake cylinder shall fall progressively. The release time, measured from
when air commences to be exhausted from the cylinder, to when the pressure reaches 0,4 bar shall be
as stated.

L 344/84

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

N3.

N4.

N5.

N6.

N7.

N8.

N9.

In order to obtain maximum brake cylinder pressure, the brake pipe pressure shall be reduced by 1,4
to 1,6 bar below the regime pressure.

The maximum brake cylinder pressure obtained from a reduction in brake pipe pressure of 1,4 to 1,6
bar shall be 3,7 to 3,9 bar.

The insensitivity of the brake to slow decreases in brake pipe pressure, shall be such that the brake is
not activated if the normal working pressure drops by 0,3 bar in one minute.

The sensitivity of the brake to decreases in brake pipe pressure shall be such that the brake is activated
within 1,2 seconds if the normal working pressure drops by 0,6 bar in 6 seconds.

After charging the brake pipe to 5 bar, isolate the brake pipe, allow time for settlement and then ensure
leakage does not exceed that stated.

After an emergency braking, with a brake pipe pressure of 0 bar, start measuring after the stabilisation
period and ensure overall leakage does not exceed that stated.

The brake shall have a device enabling manual brake release.

The brake shall be such that the pressure in the brake cylinder continuously follows the variations in
the brake pipe pressure. A pressure variation of +/- 0,1 bar in the brake pipe shall cause the distributor
to change the brake cylinder pressure correspondingly.

For one value of brake pipe pressure, the brake cylinder pressure shall not vary by more than 0,1 bar
during application and release. (For braking via pneumatically controlled relay valves for braking
power variation, the 0,1 bar value applies to the pilot pressure.)

N10.

In the case of brakes with relay valves for the variation of the braking power, the pressure of 0,3 bar
corresponds to the pressure existing at the pneumatic relay control (pilot reservoir).

N11. Wagons where the automatic air brake application/release state cannot be checked without going
underneath the wagon (for example those fitted with axle mounted disc brakes) shall be fitted with an
indicator showing the state of the automatic brake.

N12.

N13.

N14.

N15.

N16.

N17.

N18.

Correct slack adjuster operation shall be confirmed by creating an excessive brake friction pair gap,
demonstrating that repeated application/release cycles restore the correct clearance.

On the first of a series of wagons, the brake pad or block application force shall be measured to
confirm that it complies with the design.

Brake rigging shall be free such that the pads/blocks clear the brake discs/wheels in the released state,
and application forces are not reduced below design.

Parking brake components, rigging, leadscrews & nuts etc, shall be free moving and lubricated if
required by the design.

On the first of a series of wagons, the vehicle retarding force shall be measured resulting from a 500N
input force at the end of a parking brake lever, or applied tangentially to a handwheel rim. The force
measured shall comply with the design.

The parking brake shall be applied and released manually, not adversely affecting the friction pair gap
in the released state.

A parking brake indicator shall be fitted which accurately reflects the status of the parking brake,
applied or released.

The tests procedures shall conform to the European standards.

For freight wagons equipped with “R” braking mode specific tests shall be done. These tests shall conform to
the European standards.

6.2.3.4.

Environmental conditions

6.2.3.4.1.

Temperature and other environmental conditions

6.2.3.4.1.1. Temperature

All components and groups of components have to be tested in accordance with requirements given in
section 4.2 and 6 and referenced European Standards, taken into account which temperature class specified in
section 4.2.6.1.2.2 the wagon shall be approved for.

6.2.3.4.1.2. Other environmental conditions

It is sufficient for the supplier to make a declaration of conformity stating how the environmental conditions in
the following sections have been taken into account in the design of the wagon:

4.2.6.1.2.1 (Altitude)

4.2.6.1.2.3 (Humidity)

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/85

4.2.6.1.2.5 (Rain)

4.2.6.1.2.6 (Snow, ice and hail)

4.2.6.1.2.7 (Solar radiation)

4.2.6.1.2.8 (Resistance to pollution)

The Notified Body shall verify that this declaration exists and that the content is reasonable.

This does not affect specific test requirements regarding environmental conditions given in section 4 or 6. They
shall be executed and verified. Those tests shall be referenced in the declaration.

6.2.3.4.2. Aerodynamic effects

Open point to be specified at the next revision of this TSI.

6.2.3.4.3.

Cross winds

Open point to be specified at the next revision of this TSI.

7.

7.1.

IMPLEMENTATION

GENERAL

The implementation of the TSIs must take into consideration the overall migration of the conventional rail
network towards full interoperability.

In order to support
implementation with other TSIs.

this migration,

the TSIs allow for staged, gradual application and co-ordinated

In the case of this TSI it shall be implemented in close co-ordination with the Noise TSI.

7.2.

TSI REVISION

In conformity with article 6(3) of Directive 2001/16/EC as modified by Directive 2004/50/EC, the Agency shall
be responsible for preparing the review and updating of TSIs and making appropriate recommendations to the
Committee referred to in Article 21 of this directive in order to take account of developments in technology or
social requirements. In addition, the progressive adoption and revision of other TSIs may also impact this TSI.
Proposed changes to this TSI shall be subject to rigorous review and updated TSIs will be published on an
indicative periodic basis of 3 years.

The Agency shall be notified of any innovative solutions under consideration in order to determine its future
inclusion within the TSI.

7.3.

APPLICATION OF THIS TSI TO NEW ROLLING STOCK

Sections 2 to 6 and any specific provisions in paragraph 7.7 below apply in full to new freight wagons being
placed into service, with the following exceptions:

— the provisions of section 4.2.4.1.2.2 (Braking Performance elements) deceleration profile in braking

power, for which a date of implementation will be given in future revisions of the TSI.

This TSI does not apply to wagons being subject to a contract already signed or under final phase of tendering
procedure before the date of entry into force of this TSI.

7.4.

EXISTING ROLLING STOCK

7.4.1.

APPLICATION OF THIS TSI TO EXISTING ROLLING STOCK

Existing freight wagons are freight wagons that are already in service before this TSI enters into force.

The TSI does not apply to existing rolling stock as long as it is not renewed or upgraded.

L 344/86

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

7.4.2.

UPGRADING AND RENEWAL OF EXISTING FREIGHT WAGONS

Upgraded or renewed freight wagons requiring new authorisation for placing into service within the meaning
of Directive 2001/16/EC Article 14.3, shall comply with:

— sections 4.2, 5.3, 6.1.1 and 6.2 and any specific provisions in paragraph 7.7 below, as soon as this TSI

comes into force and

The following exceptions shall apply:

— 4.2.3.3.2 Hot axle box detection (To be specified at the next revision of this TSI);

— 4.2.4.1.2.2 Deceleration profile in braking power;

— 4.2.6 Environmental conditions;

— 4.2.6.2 Aerodynamic effects (T be specified at the next revision of this TSI);

— 4.2.6.3 Cross winds (To be specified at the next revision of this TSI);

— 4.2.8 Maintenance file.

For these exceptions, national rules apply.

With regards to wagons operating under the agreements specified in 7.5 below, the conditions to be applied
when renewing or upgrading these wagons are those mentioned in the relevant agreements, if any. In the
absence of such conditions, this TSI is applicable.

7.4.3.

ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR WAGON MARKING

In addition to the general case above for upgraded or renewed freight wagons, all existing interoperable freight
wagons are required to comply with the requirements of this TSI with respect to the design of wagon markings
from the date of the next overall repainting of the wagon without the intervention of a notified body. A
Member State is permitted to define an earlier date of compliance.

7.5.

WAGONS OPERATING UNDER NATIONAL, BILATERAL, MULTILATERAL OR INTERNATIONAL
AGREEMENTS

7.5.1.

EXISTING AGREEMENTS

Member States shall notify the Commission, within 6 months after the entry into force of this TSI, of the
following agreements under which freight wagons related to the scope of this TSI (construction, renewal,
upgrading, placing in service, operation and management of wagons as defined in chapter 2 of this TSI) are
operated:

— National, bilateral or multilateral agreements between Member States and Railway Undertakings or
Infrastructure Managers, agreed on either a permanent or temporary basis, and required due to the very
specific or local nature of the intended transport service;

— bilateral or multilateral agreements between Railway Undertakings, Infrastructure Managers or between

Safety Authorities, which deliver significant levels of local or regional interoperability;

— international agreements between one or more Member States and at least one third country, or between
Railway Undertakings or Infrastructure Managers of Member States and at least one Railway Undertaking
or Infrastructure Manager of a third country, which deliver significant levels of
local or regional
interoperability.

Continued operation/maintenance of wagons covered by these agreements shall be permitted as far as they do
comply with Community legislation.

The compatibility of these agreements with EU legislation including their non-discriminatory character and, in
particular, this TSI, will be assessed and the Commission will take the necessary measures such as, for example,
the revision of this TSI to include possible specific cases or transitional measures.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/87

The RIV Agreement and COTIF instruments shall not be notified.

7.5.2.

FUTURE AGREEMENTS

Any future agreement or modification of existing agreements shall take into account EU legislation and, in
particular, this TSI. Member States shall notify the Commission with such agreements/modifications. The same
procedure of § 7.5.1 then applies.

7.6.

PLACING IN SERVICE OF WAGONS

In accordance with Article 16(1) of Directive 2001/16/EC, where compliance with the TSIs has been achieved
and an EC Declaration of Verification is granted within one Member State for freight wagons, this shall be
mutually recognised by all Member States.

When seeking safety certification under article 10 of directive 2004/49 (Part B of
the certificate) or
authorisation of placing in service under article 14(1) of directive 2001/16, Railway Undertakings may seek
certification/authorisation of placing in service for grouped wagons. Wagons may be grouped according to
series or type.

Once safety certification or authorisation of placing in service is granted for grouped wagons in one Member
State, this shall be mutually recognised by all Member States in order to avoid duplication of safety/
interoperability checks by Safety Authorities.

As far as this TSI contains Open Points, authorisation for putting into service will be mutually accepted, except
as indicated in Annex JJ.

However, it must be verified that the wagons are operated on compatible infrastructures; this may be done
through the use of Infrastructure and Rolling Stock registers.

7.7.

SPECIFIC CASES

7.7.1.

INTRODUCTION

The following special provisions are permitted in the specific cases below.

These specific cases belong to two categories: the provisions apply either permanently (case “P”), or
temporarily (case “T”). In temporary cases, it is recommended that the Member States concerned should
conform with the relevant subsystem either by 2010 (case “T1”), an objective set out in Decision No 1692/96/
EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 1996 on Community guidelines for the
development of the trans-European transport network, or by 2020 (case “T2”).

7.7.2.

LIST OF SPECIFIC CASES

General specific case on the network of 1 524 mm

Member State: Finland

Case “P”:

In the territory of Finland and at Swedish cross-border station Haparanda (1 524 mm), the bogies, wheelsets
and other track gauge interfaces related interoperability constituents or/and subsystems built for track gauge
1 524 mm network are only accepted, if they comply with the following mentioned Finnish specific cases for
track gauge interfaces. Without prejudice to the above-mentioned restriction (1 524 mm gauge) all the
interoperability constituents and/or subsystems complying with the TSI requirements for 1 435 mm track
gauge are accepted at Finnish cross-border station Tornio (1 435 mm) and at train-ferry harbours on the tracks
for 1 435 mm.

L 344/88

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

7.7.2.1.

Structures and mechanical parts:

7.7.2.1.1.

Interface (e. g. Coupling) between vehicles, between set of vehicles and between trains

7.7.2.1.1.1. Track gauge 1 524 mm

Member State: Finland

Case “P”

For vehicles, which are intended for traffic in Finland, the distance between buffer centrelines is permitted to be
1 830 mm. Alternatively, it is permitted that these wagons be equipped with SA-3 couplers, or SA-3 compatible
couplers, with or without side buffers.

For vehicles which are intended for traffic in Finland it is required that where the distance between the buffer
centrelines is 1 790 mm, the width of the buffer plates shall be increased by 40 mm towards the outside.

7.7.2.1.1.2. Track gauge 1 520 mm

Member State: Poland, Slovakia, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Hungary

Case “P”

All wagons intended to operate occasionally on 1 520 mm track gauge in Poland and Slovakia on
selected 1 520 mm lines, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia shall meet the following requirements:

Each wagon compliant with this TSI for track gauge 1 520 mm and 1 435 mm shall be equipped both with
automatic coupler and screw coupling according to one of the following solutions:

— the kind of coupler can be changed at the border between the 1 435 mm and 1 520 mm networks

or

— the wagon can be equipped with buffers and automatic coupler type SA3 and intermediate coupler

or

— the wagon can be equipped with hidden buffers and automatic coupler; buffers in advanced position shall

allow operating a wagon with screw coupling or intermediate coupler.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/89

Buffers and couplers — version C

Coupler Version D

L 344/90

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Buffer and Coupler Version D

Tank wagons for dangerous goods shall be equipped with couplers shock absorber complying with following
parameters:

— dynamic absorption minimum 130 kJ

— terminal force under quasi-static loading minimum 1 000 kN.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/91

7.7.2.1.1.3. Track gauge 1 520 mm / 1 524 mm

Member State: Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Finland and Poland

Case “P”

With regards to wagons operating, or intended to operate, in bilateral traffic permanently on 1 520 mm /
1 524 mm lines between Member States and third countries, sections 4 and 5 of this TSI are not applicable.

7.7.2.1.1.4. Track gauge 1 520 mm

Member State: Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia

Case “T”

For wagons operating permanently on 1 520 mm lines between Member States, sections 4 and 5 of this TSI are
not applicable until the next revision of this TSI. The next revision shall take into consideration the specific
cases as identified from the process given in 7.5.1 of this TSI.

7.7.2.1.1.5. Track gauge 1 668 mm — Distance between buffers centrelines

Member State: Spain and Portugal

Case “P”

For vehicles, which are intended for traffic to Spain or Portugal, it is permissible for the distance between buffer
centrelines to be 1 850 mm (± 10 mm). In this case the compatibility with buffers in a standard arrangement
shall be demonstrated.

Buffer plates dimensions for two-axle wagons and bogie wagons:

Unified width of buffer plates for wagons which are intended for traffic to Spain or Portugal (distance between
centrelines 1 850 mm) shall be 550 mm or 650 mm depending of characteristics of wagons included in
applicable national regulations.

7.7.2.1.1.6.

Interface between vehicles

Member State: Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland

Case “P”

For Ireland, the buffer centres are 1 905 mm apart, and the buffer and draw gear centre heights above the rail
must be between 1 067 mm min. and 1 092 mm max with no load on the wagon. To facilitate coupling and
uncoupling during shunting, “instantor” link couplings may be permitted on freight wagons (see Annex HH).

7.7.2.1.1.7. General specific case on the network of 1 000 mm or less

Member state: Greece

Case “T1”:

For the existing isolated 1 000 mm gauge, which is not in the scope of this TSI, national rules shall apply.

L 344/92

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

7.7.2.1.2.

Safe access and egress for rolling stock

7.7.2.1.2.1. Safe access and egress for rolling stock Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland

Member State: Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland

Case “P”

For Ireland, the requirement will be that “steps and handrails where provided will be for access and egress only,
and not to permit the shunter to ride on the outside of the vehicle.”

Annex EE is not applicable in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland.

7.7.2.1.3.

Strength of main vehicle structure and securing of freight

7.7.2.1.3.1. 1 520 mm gauge lines

Member State: Poland, Slovakia, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Hungary

Case “P”

All wagons intended to operate permanently or occasionally on 1 520 mm track gauge shall meet the
following requirements:

Design loads

Longitudinal design loads

Category

Minimal values [kN]

Compressive force at automatic coupler level

Tractive force at automatic coupler level

Compressive force at axis at each buffer

Compressive force applied eccentric (50 mm) from axis at each buffer

Compressive force applied diagonally via side buffers (if fitted)

Vehicles meeting these requirements can be shunted without restriction.

— Maximum Vertical Load

3 000

2 500

1 000

750

400

Load of a wagon in boundary design condition at 150 % of maximum load shall not cause plastic strain.

Deflection of a wagon frame related to standstill shall be not more than 3 ‰ of king-pin base.

— Load combinations

The structure shall conform to load combinations from the most inconvenient case of vertical load
combined with compressive force 3 000 kN at automatic coupler and forces applied to axis at each
buffer.

Vertical, dynamical surplus resulting from reaction inertial force of load on body of a wagon and its
horizontal components reacting transversely to track shall be considered by calculation.

For tank wagons internal pressure, partial vacuum and pressure from hydraulic shock shall be considered
in addition.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/93

— Load during lifting

Wagon shall be resistant to forces during lifting without plastic strain. Additional points of support under
norms to 1 520 mm vehicles should be regarded.

Requirements for dynamic forces applied at automatic coupler

— General

A loaded and unloaded freight wagon shall be resistant to the impact of a ram wagon. This shall be
demonstrated by a test on a straight track. The weight of the ram wagon shall be equal to at least the
weight of the tested wagon. For tests of two-axle wagons a ram wagon of 100 ±3 t is recommended.

A ram wagon shall be equipped with automatic coupler type SA3 and a coupler shock absorber. The
difference between the axes of automatic couplers shall not exceed 50 mm.

The test shall apply with the following specifications:

— single test wagon not braked;

— contra-ram formed by 3 or 4 wagons formed as a group at least 300 t mass.

The applied force in loaded state shall be 3 000 kN ±10 %.

The contra ram group of wagons shall be protected against rolling by hand-brake or braking skids.

— Impact in unloaded state

The speed of the ram wagon shall be 12 km/h. The tested wagon shall be unbraked.

Loads shall not cause any plastic deflection. Tensions in selected critical points such as connection bogie/
frame, frame/wagon body and superstructure shall be recorded.

— Impact in loaded state

The tested wagon shall be loaded with the maximum load.

The maximum speed of the ram wagon shall be 12 km/h. Impact tests shall start gradually from 2 to
3 km/h.

The test shall be performed for the following ranges:

— up to 5 km/h,

— 5 to 10 km/h,

— above 10 km/h.

At least 5 impacts shall be carried out for each speed range. Additionally, 3 impact tests shall be carried
out with the impact of a compressive force equals 3 000 kN. This impact force shall be supported by
calculation.

During the tests the permissible impact compressive force shall not exceed the limit of more than 10 %. If
a boundary value of 3 000 kN ±10 % is reached just below 12 km/h the speed shall not be increased.

Additionally in order to simulate long-term sustainability 40 impact test shall be carried out either at
12 km/h or with an impact compressive force of 3 000 kN.

Loads shall not cause any plastic deflection.

L 344/94

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

— Dynamic strength condition during operation of wagons

Wagons shall be resistant to longitudinal compressive and tractive forces of 1 000 kN at 120 km/h.

7.7.2.1.3.2. 1 668 mm gauge lines — Lifting and jacking

Member State: Spain and Portugal

Case “P”

For two-axle wagons:

— Provision shall be made to limit the drop of the spring when the wagon is lifted.

An example of solution is shown in Annex X Plate 3.

— For lifting by jacks (limited to the “connections” at the maximum), each wagon shall be fitted with four
base plates, two under each underframe sole-bar, placed symmetrically in relation to the transverse axis of
the wagon.

This arrangement may also be appropriate for new axle changeover pit facility (including for multiple or
articulated wagons with no limitation on number of units).

Base plates shall have the following dimensions:

— In the longitudinal direction of the wagon: 150 mm at the maximum.

— In the transverse direction of the wagon: 100 mm.

— Thickness: 15 mm.

They shall be cross-grooved, with the slots parallel and perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the
wagons:

— Groove depth: 5 to 7 mm approximately.

— Groove width: 4 to 6 mm approximately.

The wagon infrastructure shall provide for clearance of the wheelsets when the base plates, when in the
raised position (with normal lifting jack movement of 800 mm), reach a maximum height of 1 550 mm
in relation to rail level.

Annex X Plate 6 shows the clearances to be provided on wagons for engaging the lifting-jack heads.

For bogie wagons:

— Bogies with interchangeable axles shall be fitted with a device to limit the descent of the springs on lifting

the wagons with their bogies.

It is recommended that the device shown in Annex X Plate 10 be adopted.

— The maximum wagon length over buffers may not exceed 24,486 m. The underframe structure shall be
capable of bearing the weight of the bogie frames during of lifting in the conditions defined in the next
paragraph.

— The positioning of lifting jacks on work sites shall comply with the diagram shown in Annex X Plate 13.

The arrangements adopted are appropriate for handling all wagons with an overall length not exceeding
24,480 m.

The wagon lifting operations shall be effected by simultaneous raising of the underframe and bogie
frames. The wagons shall be provided with cables to secure the bogie frames to the body during these
operations. Annex X Plate 14 shows the devices fitted to the bogies at 4 points and to the wagon

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/95

underframe at 8 points, to enable such securing to be carried out at the time of lifting and the cables to
be placed in the idle position when not in use.

Wagon underframes shall be fitted with base plates to the following dimensions:

— Length in longitudinal direction of wagon: 250 mm minimum.

— Width in transverse direction of wagon: 100 mm.

— Thickness: 15 mm.

The contact surface of base plates shall be grooved in accordance with indications given in paragraph
relating to 2-axle wagons.

The position of the base-plates on the wagon underframes and the clearances to be provided for engaging
the lifting jacks noses are represented in Annex X Plate 15. This position is appropriate for new axle-
changeover pit installing (also for multiple or articulated wagons with no limitation on the number of
units).

The wagon infrastructure shall provide for clearance of the wheelsets when the base-plates, in the raised
position (with normal lifting jack movement of 900 mm), reach a maximum height of 1 650 m in
relation to rail level.

7.7.2.2.

Vehicle track interaction and gauging

7.7.2.2.1.

Kinematic gauge

7.7.2.2.1.1. Kinematic gauge Great Britain

Member State: Great Britain

Case “P”

For wagons intended to run on the British network, see Annex T.

7.7.2.2.1.2. 1 520 mm and 1 435 mm track gauge wagons

Member State: Poland, Slovakia, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia

Case “P”

For wagons intended to run on 1 520 mm and 1 435 mm track gauge, see Annex U.

7.7.2.2.1.3. Kinematic gauge Finland

Member State: Finland

Case “P”

For wagons which are intended only for traffic in Finland and at the Swedish cross-border station Haparanda
(1 524 mm), the vehicle gauge shall not exceed the gauge FIN 1 as defined in Annex W.

7.7.2.2.1.4. Kinematic gauge Spain and Portugal

Member State: Spain and Portugal

Case “P”

Passing over vertical transition curves (including marshalling yard humps) and over braking, shunting or
stopping devices.

It shall be possible for bogies to negotiate an angle of elevation for access to ferry-boats, whose maximum link-
span angle with the horizontal is 2o 30' on 120 m curves.

Passing over curves.

L 344/96

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

It shall be possible for the wagons to run through curve of 60 m radius for flat wagons and 75 m for other
types on standard-gauge track and through curves of 120 m on broad-gauge track.

7.7.2.2.1.5. Kinematic gauge Ireland

Member State: Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland

Case “P”

Dynamic wagon loading gauge:

Freight wagons operating between Ireland and Northern Ireland shall conform to the Iarnród Éireann wagons
dynamic loading gauge and the Northern Ireland (GNR) wagons dynamic loading gauge shown on the
composite gauge drawing no. 07000/121 Annex HH. Static wagon gauge dimensions indicated on this drawing
must also be respected.

Wagon construction:

The maximum construction gauge of the wagons shall be determined in accordance with the national rules.

7.7.2.2.2.

Static axle load, dynamic wheel load and linear load

7.7.2.2.2.1. Static axle load, dynamic wheel load and linear load Finland

Member State: Finland

Case “P”

For vehicles intended for traffic in Finland, the admissible axle load shall be 22,5 tonnes at the maximum speed
of 120 km/h and 25 tonnes at the maximum speed of 100 km/h, when the wheel diameter is between 920 to
840 mm.

7.7.2.2.2.2. Static axle load, dynamic wheel load and linear load Great Britain

Member State: Great Britain

Case “P”

The classification of lines and line sections in Great Britain is carried out according to the Notified National
Standard (Railway Group Standard GE/RT8006 “Interface between Rail Vehicle Weights and Underline
Bridges”). Vehicles intended to operate in Great Britain shall obtain classification according to this standard.

The classification for the wagon is determined according to the geometrical position and the loads on each axle.

7.7.2.2.2.3. Static axle load, dynamic wheel load and linear load Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia

Member State: Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia

Case “P”

For the vehicle gauge national rules shall be applied.

7.7.2.2.2.4. Static axle load, dynamic wheel load and linear load Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland

Member State: Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland

Case “P”

The static axle load limit for wagons is 15,75 tonnes for the Irish network, but the operation of bogie wagons
with 18,8 tonne axle loading is permitted on certain routes.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/97

7.7.2.2.3.

Rolling stock parameters which influence ground based train monitoring systems

7.7.2.2.4.

Vehicle dynamic behaviour

Category “P” — permanent

7.7.2.2.4.1. List of specific cases of wheel diameter related to various track gauges.

Designation

Wheel diameter
(mm)

Gauge (mm)

Minimum value
(mm)

Maximum value
(mm)

Distance between outside sur-
faces of the flange (SR)

≥ 840

Distance between inner faces of
the flange (AR)

≥ 840

Width of the rim (BR)

Thickness of the flange (Sd)

Height of the flange (Sh)

≥ 330

≥ 840

< 840 and ≥
330

≥ 760

< 760 and ≥
630

< 630 and ≥
330

Face of flange (QR)

≥ 330

1 520

1 524

1 602

1 668

1 520

1 524

1 602

1 668

1 520

1 520

others

1 509

1 514

1 659

1 443

1 448

1 596

140 (1)

33

33

36

36

36

1 487

1 487

1 643

1 437

1 442

1 590

133

24

27,5

28

30

32

6.5

Sizes above are indicated as a function of the height of the upper rail level and shall be met by empty or full wagons.
(1) Burr value included
The wheel sets of freight wagons running permanently on 1 520 mm gauge shall be measured in accordance with the wheel set
measurement procedure specified for 1 520 mm freight wagons.

7.7.2.2.4.2. Material for wheels:

According to the Nordic climatic conditions, a specific wheel material is generally used in Finland and in
Norway. It is similar to ER8 but with a level of manganese and silicon increased to improved properties against
shelling. For domestic traffic this material may be used if agreed between the parties.

7.7.2.2.4.3. Specific loads cases:

Additional forces shall be used if the parameters of the line generate higher forces.

(e.g.: small curves …)

7.7.2.2.4.4. Vehicle dynamic behaviour Spain and Portugal

Member State: Spain and Portugal

Case “P”

Width of the rim.

In the case of axle designed for 22,5 t loads, use may be made of those whose drawings are given in Annex X
Plate 1 and which are derived for the ERRI standard axle design. Additional arrangements shall be made in

L 344/98

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

some cases so as to comply with the gauge of the active surfaces of the wheel flanges of the axle included in the
present TSI.

7.7.2.2.4.5. Vehicle dynamic behaviour Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland

Member State: Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland

Case “P”

Rolling stock should be designed to operate safely over a track twist of up to 17o/oo over a 2,7 m base, and up to
4o/oo over a 11,2 m base.

The maximum and minimum values for SR and AR are as follows:

SR

AR

BR

Sd

Sh

QR

All wheel diameters

1 571 mm min.

1 588 mm max.

All wheel diameters

1 523 mm min

1 524 mm max.

All wheel diameters

127 mm min.

135 mm max.

All wheel diameters

24 mm min

32 mm max.

All wheel diameters

30,5 mm min.

38 mm max.

All wheel diameters

6,5

7.7.2.2.5.

Longitudinal compressive forces

7.7.2.2.5.1. Longitudinal compressive forces Poland and Slovakia in selected 1 520 mm lines, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia

Member State: Poland and Slovakia in selected 1 520 mm lines, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia

Case “P”

Requirements for 1 520 mm gauge wagons for wagons of gauge 1 435 mm to operate on 1 520 mm network.

Countries: Poland and Slovakia in selected 1 520 mm lines, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia

Wagons equipped with automatic couplers shall be resistant to longitudinal compressive and tractive forces of
1 000 kN at 120 km/h.

7.7.2.2.6.

Bogie and Running Gear

7.7.2.2.6.1. Bogie and Running Gear Poland and Slovakia in selected 1 520 mm lines, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia

Member State: Poland and Slovakia in selected 1 520 mm lines, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia

Case “P”

In Poland and Slovakia in selected 1 520 mm lines, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, the requirements for wagons with
variable-gauge running gear of 1 435 mm/1 520 mm gauge required to operate on 1 520 mm network are the
following.

a)

General

For two-axle bogies permissible wheelset spacing shall be between 1 800 mm and 2 400 mm.

Running gear intended for use on European rail networks of 1 520 mm gauge shall be able to withstand
an operating temperature range of - 40 oC to + 40 oC. For Asian 1 520 mm gauge networks, running
gear shall be suitable for a temperature range of - 60 oC to + 45 oC and a relative humidity of 0-100 %.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/99

b)

Running gear frames

The running gear frame may be welded or cast. The steel used shall be weldable without pre-heating and
shall have a minimum tensile strength of 370 N/mm2. The minimum values to be obtained for notched
bar impact strength (V notch as specified for ISO test) are summarised in the following table:

-20 oC

27

Notched bar impact strength [J]

-40 oC

27

-60 oC

21

Proof required for running on 1 520 mm gauge system only.

7.7.2.2.6.2. Bogie and Running Gear Spain and Portugal

Member State: Spain and Portugal

Case “P”

Overall dimensions of bogie.

Bogies with interchangeable axles shall have a minimum wheelbase of 1,80 m and a distance between
suspension planes of 2,170 m. The overall dimensions of the bogie are given in Annex X Plate 7. The overall
dimensions thus defined apply to a bogie suitable for S braking conditions. The French and Spanish National
Authorities shall be consulted over application of the SS braking conditions.

The height of the pivoting centre shall be 925 mm above rail level and the radius of the pivoting bearing shall
be 190 mm as for the standard-gauge bogie. The pivot shall comply with the drawing in Annex X Plate 8.

Axle box for wagon bogies.

Axle boxes shall comply with the drawing shown in Annex X Plate 9.

Retractable safety device linking axle to bogie frame.

Axle boxes shall comprise a safety system enabling the axles to be secured to the bogie frame. Such a device,
shown in Annex X Plate 11, shall be retractable during axle changeover operations.

Wheels.

For two-axle wagons:

The diameter of the running tread of new wheels shall be 1 000 mm maximum.

For bogie wagons:

The diameter of the running tread of new wheels shall be 920 mm.

Wheelsets.

The wheelsets shall bear a serial number, a type number and the owner's mark.

These indications, together with the date (month and year) of the last overhaul of the wheelsets, the code index
of the owning or registering railway, and the index of the location which has carried out the overhaul, shall be
shown on a floating collar on the axle shaft.

The code number of the owning or registering railway and the date (month and year) of the last overhaul shall
be reproduced in white paint on the front of each axle box.

L 344/100

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Axle box and guard plates.

The axle boxes, axle guards and spring buckles shall be designed to enable the indications shown in Plate 2 to
be respected (the diameter of the hole in the upper side of the axle box shall allow for the use of a ring or stop
for adjustment of the suspension, as shown in Annex X).

As the wheel of the broad-gauge axle are quite close to the wagon underframe, a stirrup with 14 or 10 mm
axle-guard shall be used: see Plate 18.

It is recommended that use should be made of axle-guard stays that can be removed and assembled quickly.
They shall be fixed by means of 2 M-20 × 55 bolts fitted with growed washers. On construction, the distance
between hole centres shall be 483 +1/0 mm.

Overall surface area of wheelsets.

The underframes of vehicles shall have a completely unobstructed space, level with each wheel, as shown in
Plate 4.

Axle design

The axles shall be capable of supporting the maximum load laid down for lines suitable for 20t axle-loads (lines
in category C) or for 22,5t axle-loads (lines in category D). They shall be fitted with roller bearing axle boxes
and be interchangeable with existing axles. The new axles shall be designed in accordance with the provisions
laid down in the present TSI. The use of automatic variable-gauge wheelsets, which are able to run on both
1 435 mm and 1 668 mm lines, are allowed only with the agreement of Spanish and French competent
Authorities for international transport through this latter Member State..

7.7.2.3.

Braking

7.7.2.3.1.

Braking performance

7.7.2.3.1.1. Braking performance Great Britain

Member State: Great Britain

Case “P”

Freight wagons intended for use on the British network see Annex V section V2

7.7.2.3.1.2. Braking performance Poland and Slovakia in selected 1 520 mm lines, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia

Member State: Poland and Slovakia in selected 1 520 mm lines, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia

Case “P”

— Distributors

Interoperability wagons for 1 435 mm to operate on 1 520 mm network shall be equipped with
additional braking systems in accordance with the following:

Option 1: fit two distributors with a changeover device

— for the 1 435 mm gauge: distributor according to Annex I

— for the 1 520 mm gauge: type 483 distributor

Option 2: fit a standard distributor or an approved KE/483 distributor combination on the wagon that
meets the technical braking requirements of both 1 435 mm and 1 520 mm gauge railways, with a
changeover device allowing the system to switch to the respective operating regime.

Under option 1, the wagon's brake equipment must include “brake on/off” and “freight/passenger”
changeover devices as well as an “empty/loaded” device it there is no automatic load-proportional
braking facility According to Annex I and a “brake on/off” and “empty — partly loaded — loaded” device

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/101

as per the standards for the 1 520 mm gauge and the “Technical Requirements for the Brake Equipment
of Wagons built in RF Workshops”.

Each distributor must have its own release valve with a pull chord with handles on both sides of the
wagon.

For braking option 2, a distributor should preferably be used in combination with an automatic load-
proportional braking system. When the braking position is switched over manually in accordance with
the load, there must be at least two graduated positions for the braking force.

— Load-proportional braking, brake power and brake performance

The wagon's brakes must ensure that the prescribed values for the braked weight and the theoretical
brake farce coefficients are guaranteed for operation on both 1 435 mm and 1 520 mm gauges at the
respective maximum speeds.

For operation on the 1 435 mm gauge, wagons shall be fitted with either a hand-operated load-
changeover device or an automatic load-proportional braking system meeting the requirements
according to Annex I.

For operation on the 1 520 mm gauge, wagons shall be fitted with either an automatic load-proportional
braking system or a hand-operated load-changeover device with at least two positions. Use of the
automatic system and its configuration for the 1 520 mm track gauge shall give due consideration to the
bogie design used and the type of transition from one gauge to the other.

Brake performance shall be calculated on the basis of the “Standard Braking Calculation for Freight and
Refrigerator Wagons”. Here, the theoretical coefficient calculated for the wagon brake block force when
the brake system is switched on to the 1 520 mm gauge shall satisfy the following values:

— for K (composite) brake blocks: at least 0,14 up to a maximum of 0,31 for a fully-laden wagon and

at least 0,22 up to a maximum of 0,37 for an empty wagon;

— for GG (cast-iron) brake blocks: at least 0,36 up to a maximum of 0,70 for a fully-laden wagon and

at least 0,62 up to a maximum of 0,81 for an empty wagon.

The different wagon braking forces specified in the standards for operation on 1 435 mm and 1 520 mm
track gauges can be accommodated by an appropriate adjustment to the brake rigging or the brake
cylinder.

— Changeover device for switching from 1 435 to 1 520 mm track gauges

The changeover from one distributor system to another shall take place during the gauge changeover
operation using the 1 435 mm/1 520 mm changeover device. Actuation of this device must require
minimum effort and must jack reliably into its final position. The final position selected must correspond
to one braking system only and must render the second braking system non-operational. When one
braking system fails, the other must remain operational, assuming the wagon has two separate
distributors.

The switch from one braking system to another may only be effected in the gauge changeover station
either manually (by means of a special device) or automatically.

The braking system selected must be clearly indicated, even when the changeover takes place
automatically.

Where the changeover takes place automatically, an automatic load-proportional braking system should
preferably be used.

L 344/102

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

7.7.2.3.1.3. Braking performance Finland

Member State: Finland

Case “P”

For vehicles for 1 524 mm gauge only, braking power shall be determined based on the minimum distance of
1 200 m between signals on the Finnish network. Minimum braked weight percentage is 55 % for 100 km/h
and 85 % for 120 km/h.

The requirements for energy limits related to the slope with a mean declivity of 21 ‰ and a length of 46 km
(slope of St Gothard's line) are not valid for vehicles for 1 524 mm gauge only.

In vehicles for 1 524 mm gauge only, the parking brake shall be designed such that fully loaded wagons shall
be held on a gradient of 2,5 % with maximum adhesion of 0,15 with no wind. In wagons built for the
transport of road vehicles the parking brake is operated from the ground.

7.7.2.3.1.4. Braking performance Spain and Portugal

Member State: Spain and Portugal

Case “P”

Brake-shoe arrangement.

For two-axle wagons:

Brake shoes shall be assembled in accordance with the requirements indicated in Plate 5. The assembly in Plate
12 for bogie wagons may also be used.

For bogie wagons:

Brake shoes shall be assembled in accordance with the provisions in Plate 12.

7.7.2.3.1.5. Braking performance Finland, Sweden, Norway, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania

Member State: Finland, Sweden, Norway, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania

Case “T1”

Requirements of this TSI concerning the use of composite blocks approved based on the existing UIC
specifications and test methods are not in general valid for Finland, Norway, Sweden, Estonia and Lithuania.

Composite brake blocks shall be assessed on a national basis and shall take into consideration environmental
winter conditions.

This specific case is valid until the specifications and assessment methods have been further developed and
proven to be sufficient for Nordic Winter Conditions.

That does not preclude freight wagons from other member states from operating in Nordic and Baltic states.

7.7.2.3.1.6. Braking performance Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland

Member State: Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland

Case “P”

Service Brake: The stopping distance of a new wagon operating on straight and level track on the railway
network in Ireland must not exceed:

Stopping distance = (v2/(2*0,55) m

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/103

(where v = max operating speed of wagon on IR network in m/s)

The maximum operating speed must be less than or equal to 120 km/h. These conditions must be met for all
conditions of loading.

7.7.2.3.2.

Parking brake

7.7.2.3.2.1. Parking brake Great Britain

Member State: UK

Case “P”

Freight wagons intended for use on the British network see Annex V section V1

7.7.2.3.2.2. Parking brake Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland

Member State: Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland

Case “P”

For new wagons used solely on the railway network in Ireland every wagon has to be equipped with a parking
brake that must hold a fully loaded wagon on a gradient of 2,5 % with a maximum of 10 % adhesion with no
wind.

Ireland requests exception from requirements where the parking brake is to be operated ‘from the vehicle’, in
favour of a requirement that ‘the parking brake is to operated from the vehicle or from the ground’.

7.7.2.4.

Environmental conditions

7.7.2.4.1.

Environmental conditions

7.7.2.4.1.1. Environmental conditions Spain and Portugal

Member State: Spain and Portugal

Case “P”

In Spain and Portugal the upper external temperature limit is + 50 instead of + 45 given by temperature class
Ts in section 4.2.6.1.2.2.

7.7.2.4.2.

Fire safety

7.7.2.4.2.1. Fire safety Spain and Portugal

Member State: Spain and Portugal

Case “P”

Spark arrester.

Category “P”- permanent

For two-axle wagons:

Spark arrester shields shall be constructed and arranged in accordance with Plate 16.

The external part of these shields shall be directed downwards, and their upper part shall be curved.

The width of their upper part shall be 415 +5/0 mm; the distance between inside edges shall be 1 120 mm.

The vertical part of these shields shall be 115 mm in height, and the part pointing downwards 32 mm at 30o.
The distance of these shields in relation to the floor shall be 20 mm, and the radius of the curved part 1 800

L 344/104

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

mm. Axle wagons accepted for transit between France and Spain, with dangerous goods in RID classes 1a and
1b shall have their brake isolated while running.

For bogie wagons:

— The spark arrester shields shall be constructed and arranged in accordance with Plate 17.

— They shall be smooth and 500 mm wide.

— The distance between their inside edges shall be 1 100 mm ± 10.

— In relation to the floor, the minimum distance of these shields shall be 80 mm.

7.7.2.4.3.

Electrical protection

7.7.2.4.3.1. Electrical protection Poland and Slovakia in selected 1 520 mm lines, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia

Member State: Poland and Slovakia in selected 1 520 mm lines, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia

Case “P”

Additional requirements for 1 520 mm wagons and 1 435 mm wagons to operate on 1 520 mm network.

7.7.3.

TABLE OF SPECIFIC CASES ARRANGED BY MEMBER STATE

Country

Section

Parameter

Specific case

Category

All countries

4.2.3.4

Vehicle dynamic behaviour 7.7.2.2.4.1.

Finland

Finland

Finland

Finland

4.2.2.1

Interface (e.g. coupling)
between vehicles

7.7.2.1.1.1

4.2.3.1

Kinematic gauge

7.7.2.2.1.3

4.2.3.2

Static axle load, dynamic
wheel load and linear load

7.7.2.2.2.1

4.2.4.1

Braking performance

7.7.2.3.1.3

P

P

P

P

P

Finland, Sweden, Norway,
Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania

6.2.3.3
(Annex P)

Braking performance

7.7.2.3.1.5

T1

Finland, Estonia, Latvia,
Lithuania, Poland

Sections 4 and
5

Subsystem characterisation
and interoperability consti-
tuents

7.7.2.1.1.3

Finland and Norway

5.3.2.3

Wheels

7.7.2.2.4.2

Great Britain

4.2.3.1

Kinematic gauge

7.7.2.2.1.1

Great Britain

4.2.3.2

Static axle load, dynamic
wheel load and linear load

7.7.2.2.2.2

Great Britain

4.2.4.1.2.2

Braking performance

7.7.2.3.1.1

Great Britain

4.2.4.1.2.8

Parking brake

7.7.2.3.2

Greece

4.2.3.4

Vehicle dynamic behaviour 7.7.2.1.1.6

Poland, Slovakia, Lithuania,
Latvia and Estonia

4.2.2.1

Interface (e.g. coupling)
between vehicles

7.7.2.1.1.2

P

P

P

P

P

P

T1

P

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/105

Country

Section

Parameter

Specific case

Category

Poland, Slovakia, Lithuania,
Latvia and Estonia

4.2.2.3

Strength of main vehicle
structure

7.7.2.1.3.1

Poland, Slovakia, Lithuania,
Latvia and Estonia

4.2.3.1

Kinematic gauge

7.7.2.2.1.2

Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia 4.2.3

Static axle load, dynamic
wheel load and linear load

7.7.2.2.2.3

Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia Sections 4 and

5

Subsystem characterisation
and interoperability consti-
tuents

7.7.2.1.1.4

Poland, Slovakia, Lithuania,
Latvia and Estonia

4.2.3.4

Vehicle dynamic behaviour 7.7.2.2.4

Poland, Slovakia, Lithuania,
Latvia and Estonia

4.2.3.5

Longitudinal compressive
forces

7.7.2.2.5.1

Poland, Slovakia, Lithuania,
Latvia and Estonia

Poland, Slovakia, Lithuania,
Latvia and Estonia

Poland, Slovakia, Lithuania,
Latvia and Estonia

5.3.2.1

Bogies and running gear

7.7.2.2.6.1

4.2.4.1

Braking performance

7.7.2.3.1.2

4.2.7.3

Electrical protection

7.7.2.4.3.1

Republic of Ireland and
Northern Ireland

4.2.1

Interface (e.g. coupling)
between vehicles

7.7.2.1.1.5

Republic of Ireland and
Northern Ireland

4.2.2.2

Safe access and egress

7.7.2.1.2.1

Republic of Ireland and
Northern Ireland

4.2.3

Static axle load, dynamic
wheel load and linear load

7.7.2,2.2.4

Republic of Ireland and
Northern Ireland

Republic of Ireland and
Northern Ireland

Republic of Ireland and
Northern Ireland

4.2.3.4

Vehicle dynamic behaviour 7.7.2.2.4.5

4.2.4.1

Braking performance

7.7.2.3.1.5

4.2.4.1.2.8

Parking brake

7.7.2.3.2.2

Spain and Portugal

4.2.2.1

Interface (e.g. coupling)
between vehicles

7..2.1.1.4

Spain and Portugal

4.2.2.3

Strength of main vehicle
structure

7.7.2.1.3.2

Spain and Portugal

4.2.3.1

Kinematic gauge

7.7.2.2.1.4

Spain and Portugal

4.2.3.4

Vehicle dynamic behaviour 7.7.2.2.4.4

Spain and Portugal

Spain and Portugal

5.3.2.1

4.2.4.1

Bogies and Running Gear

7.7.2.2.6.2

Braking performance

7.7.2.3.1.4

Spain and Portugal

4.2.6.1.2.2

Environmental conditions

7.7.2.4.1.1

Spain and Portugal

4.2.7.2

Fire Safety

7.7.2.4.2.1

P

P

P

T

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

P

L 344/106

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

ANNEX A

STRUCTURES AND MECHANICAL PARTS

A.1. Buffers

Fig. A1

Buffer supporting plate

A.2. Draw Gear

Fig. A2

Draw hook — dimensions

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/107

Fig. A3

D-shackle for screw coupler

L 344/108

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Fig. A4

Draw- and buffing gear

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/109

Fig. A5

Berne rectangle

ESPACES LIBRES A RESERVER AUX EXTREMITES DES VEHICULES

FREIZUHALTENDE RÄUME AN DEN WAGENENDEN

CLEARANCES TO BE PROVIDED AT VEHICLE EXTREMITIES

L 344/110

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Fig. A6

Screw coupler and draw hooks

Clearance to be provided at wagon extremities above the draw hook

Fig. A7

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/111

ANNEX B

STRUCTURES AND MECHANICAL PARTS

MARKING OF FREIGHT WAGONS

B.1.

VEHICLE UNIQUE NUMBER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

113

B.2.

VEHICLE TARE WEIGHT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

113

B.3.

VEHICLE LOAD TABLE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

113

B.4.

LENGTH OVER BUFFERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

115

B.5.

SYMBOLS FOR TRAFFIC TO GREAT BRITAIN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

115

B.6.

WAGONS BUILT FOR RUNNING BETWEEN COUNTRIES WITH DIFFERENT TRACK GAUGES . . . . . . . .

116

B.7.

AUTOMATIC GAUGE CHANGING WHEELSETS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

116

B.8.

B.9.

SHUNTING PROHIBITED ON HUMPS WITH A SMALLER CURVE RADIUS THAN THAT SHOWN IN
THE DRAWING BELOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

BOGIE WAGONS WITH A DISTANCE BETWEEN AXLES IN EXCESS OF 14 000 MM AND WHICH ARE
ACCEPTED FOR HUMP SHUNTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

B.10. WAGONS PROHIBITED FROM PASSING THROUGH RETARDERS OR OTHER STOPPING DEVICES IN
SERVICE MODE 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

116

117

117

B.11.

TABLE OF MAINTENANCE DATES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

117

B.12.

HIGH VOLTAGE WARNING NOTICE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

118

B.13.

POSITION OF LIFTING/JACKING POINTS 11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

119

B.14.

MAXIMUM LOAD OF WAGON . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

120

B.15.

CAPACITY OF TANK WAGONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

120

B.16.

CONTAINER WAGON FLOOR HEIGHT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

120

B.17.

MINIMUM CURVE RADIUS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

121

B.18.

SIGN FOR BOGIE WAGONS ONLY PERMITTED TO NEGOTIATE TRAIN-FERRY RAMPS WITH A
MAXIMUM RAMP CHANGE ANGLE OF 2o30‘
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

121

B.19.

MARKINGS ON PRIVATELY OWNED WAGONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

121

B.20.

MARKINGS ON FREIGHT WAGONS RELATING TO SPECIFIC RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH THE
WAGON . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

121

B.21.

POSITION OF LOADS: PLATFORM WAGONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

122

B.22.

DISTANCES BETWEEN OUTER WHEELSETS OR BOGIE CENTRES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

125

B.23. WAGONS WHICH NEED SPECIAL CARE IN SHUNTING (E.G BI MODAL UNIT) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

126

B.24.

MANUALLY APPLIED PARKING BRAKE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

126

B.25.

INSTRUCTIONS AND SAFETY ADVICES FOR SPECIAL EQUIPMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

126

B.26.

NUMBERING OF WHEELSETS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

126

L 344/112

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

B.27.

RAKING MARKINGS ON WAGONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

127

B.27.1.

Inscriptions denoting the type of air brake . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

127

B.27.2. Marking of the braked mass on vehicles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

127

B.27.2.1. Vehicles not fitted with changeover devices. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

127

B.27.2.2. Vehicles fitted with manual changeover equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

127

B.27.2.3. Vehicles having two or more sets of brake equipment with separate ‘empty-loaded’ devices. . . . . . . . . . . . .

128

B.27.2.4. Vehicles fitted with a braking device varying automatically and progressively as the load varies. . . . . . . . .

128

B.27.2.5. Wagons fitted with devices for the automatic control of the ‘empty-loaded’ apparatus. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

129

B.27.3. Others marking concerning the braking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

130

B.27.3.1. Marking denoting the installation of a high power R brake system with brake mode ‘R’

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

130

B.27.3.2. Marking denoting a brake with composite brake-shoe inserts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

130

B.27.3.3. Marking denoting disc brakes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

131

B.28. WAGON WITH AUTOMATIC COUPLER UNDER OSSHD STANDARD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

131

B.29.

PLATE ‘PERMISSION TO OPERATE ON 1 520 MM TRACKS’

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

132

B.30. WAGON WITH VARIABLE-GAUGE WHEELSETS (1 435 MM/1 520 MM) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

132

B.31.

MARKING ON BOGIES WITH VARIABLE-GAUGE WHEELSETS (1 435 MM/1 520 MM)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

132

B.32.

MARKING OF WAGONS AND COACHES BUILT TO GAUGES GA, GB OR GC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

132

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/113

B.1. VEHICLE UNIQUE NUMBER

(Location: to the left, on each side)

The vehicle number shall be at least 80 mm in height and shall be located not more than 2 m above rail level. The location
of the number shall be such that it is not obscured by any tarpaulin that may be used to sheet the wagon.

Further details are to be found in an EN which has been requested.

B.2. VEHICLE TARE WEIGHT

(Location: to the left, on each side)

Fig. B1

Tare weight of wagon not fitted with handbrakes.

Marking for the tare weight and braked weight of wagons fitted with handbrakes.

Fig. B2

If the Handbrake is ground operated, the latter must be framed in red.

When there are more brakes than 1 fitted on a wagon and acting individually, the number of these brakes is to be shown in
front of the braked weight (e.g. 2 x 0,00 t).

B.3. VEHICLE LOAD TABLE

(Location: to the left, on each side)

Fig. B3

L 344/114

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Fig. B4

Fig. B5

Meaning of footnotes to the figures:

1) Maximum payload in tonnes for wagons in trains worked at up to 100 km/h

2) Maximum payload in tonnes for wagons in trains worked at up to 120 km/h

3)

For wagons able to run at a maximum speed of 120 km/h only when empty

4) Wagons that can be forwarded with the same loads as in S traffic at 120 km/h, shall have the sign ‘* *’ placed to the
right of the maximum load markings. The scope of application of the ‘**’ marking (upgraded/renewed wagons only, or
new and upgraded/renewed wagons) is an Open Point

NOTE :

Markings for D line categories may only be placed on wagons in respect of which a higher axle load is allowed for the
D category than for the C category.

Fig. B6

Dimensions of Load Table

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/115

B.4. LENGTH OVER BUFFERS

(Location: to the left, on each side)

Fig. B7

B.5. SYMBOLS FOR TRAFFIC TO GREAT BRITAIN

(Location: to the left, on each side)

Fig. B8

for wagons accepted on train-ferries

Fig. B9

for wagons accepted through the Channel Tunnel

for wagons accepted on train-ferries and through the Channel Tunnel

Fig. B10

L 344/116

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

B.6. WAGONS BUILT FOR RUNNING BETWEEN COUNTRIES WITH DIFFERENT TRACK GAUGES

(Location: to the right, on each side)

Fig. B11

B.7. AUTOMATIC GAUGE CHANGING WHEELSETS

(Location: to the right, on each side)

Running gear with automatic gauge-changeover capability for track gauges within the 1 435 mm to 1 668 mm range

Fig. B12

B.8. SHUNTING PROHIBITED ON HUMPS WITH A SMALLER CURVE RADIUS THAN THAT SHOWN IN THE

DRAWING BELOW

(Location:to the left of each solebar)

Fig. B13

This marking indicates the minimum negotiable hilltop or tub vertical curve radius for wagons which by virtue of their
design are liable to sustain damage when passing over humps with a 250m curve radius.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/117

B.9. BOGIE WAGONS WITH A DISTANCE BETWEEN AXLES IN EXCESS OF 14 000 MM AND WHICH ARE ACCEPTED

FOR HUMP SHUNTING

(Location:to the left of each solebar)

This marking is for bogie wagons with a distance in excess of 14 000mm between two adjacent axles.

It indicates the greatest distance between adjacent axles;

Fig. B14

B.10. WAGONS PROHIBITED FROM PASSING THROUGH RETARDERS OR OTHER STOPPING DEVICES IN SERVICE

MODE

(Location:to the left of each solebar)

Fig. B15

This marking is for wagons which because of their construction must not pass through retarders or other marshalling and
braking devices in operational mode.

B.11. TABLE OF MAINTENANCE DATES

(Location: to the right of each solebar)

It must be possible, having regard to the maintenance system used, to demonstrate the validity of the data presented on the
maintenance plate.

L 344/118

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Fig. B16

1) Maintenance-plate validity period

2) Marking of the workshop that takes responsibility for maintenance work, so enabling the validity period to be

changed

3) Work performance date (day, month, year)

4)

Additional marking. May only be applied by the owning RU.

B.12. HIGH VOLTAGE WARNING NOTICE

Fig. B17

For vehicles built after 1.1.1987

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/119

This marking is located on wagons with footboards placed at a height of over 2 000 mm above rail level or with steps
whose end exceeds this dimension adjacent to these fittings. It is positioned so that it becomes visible before the danger zone
is actually reached.

B.13. POSITION OF LIFTING/JACKING POINTS

This marking is located to the left and to the right on each solebar, level with the lifting points.

Fig. B18

Lifting without running gear in workshop.

Fig. B19

Lifting at 4 points with or without running gear.

Lifting with or without running gear or rerailing by only one extremity or close to the extremity.

Fig. B20

L 344/120

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

B.14. MAXIMUM LOAD OF WAGON

(Location: to the right of each solebar)

This marking is for wagons with a loading capacity in excess of the highest maximum load marked and wagons without
maximum-load markings. It indicates the maximum authorised load for the wagon concerned.

Fig. B21

B.15. CAPACITY OF TANK WAGONS

(Location: to the left, on each side)

In the case of tank wagons, etc., the capacity in cubic metres, hectolitres, or litres is indicated using the marking as shown
below.

Fig. B22

Fig. B23

B.16. CONTAINER WAGON FLOOR HEIGHT

(Location: to the right, on each side)

This sign is located on container wagons fit for carrying large containers and/or swap bodies; it indicates the height in mm
of the loading plane of the wagon when it is not laden.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/121

B.17. MINIMUM CURVE RADIUS

(Location: to the left of each solebar)

This marking is for bogie wagons which are only able to negotiate curves over 35m in radius, indicating the minimum
authorised curve radius.

Fig. B24

B.18. SIGN FOR BOGIE WAGONS ONLY PERMITTED TO NEGOTIATE TRAIN-FERRY RAMPS WITH A MAXIMUM RAMP

CHANGE ANGLE OF 2O30‘

(Location: to the left of each solebar)

This marking is for bogie wagons which can only pass over a train-ferry ramp angle of less than 2o30’, indicating the
maximum permissible ramp angle for the wagon concerned.

Fig. B25

B.19. MARKINGS ON PRIVATELY OWNED WAGONS

(Location: to the left, on each side)

Privately owned freight wagons shall be marked with the name and address of the registered keeper.

B.20. MARKINGS ON FREIGHT WAGONS RELATING TO SPECIFIC RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH THE WAGON

(a)

In cases where the wagon bodies (superstructures) are liable to move by reference to the underframe (wagons with
shock-absorbers, etc.), parts likely to be covered during impact must be painted with diagonal black strips on a yellow
background to draw attention to danger areas.

(b)

To avoid possible danger from cable hoods protruding by more than 150 mm, such hooks must be painted as follows:

— cable hook and protection device: yellow;

— brackets for cable hooks

— protruding up to 250 mm: yellow

— protruding by more than 250 mm: diagonal black strips on yellow background

L 344/122

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

B.21. POSITION OF LOADS: PLATFORM WAGONS

(Location: in the centre of each solebar)

The flat wagons with a usable floor length exceeding 10m, and open high-sided wagons built after 1 January 1968, the
maximum height for individual loads distributed over at least three different lengths of supporting surface, must have a
marking as shown in Fig. B28 or B29.

This information is optional for all other wagons;

This sign is optional in respect of all other wagons, on which if necessary the sign as shown in Fig. B26 or B27 or B28 or
B29, can be affixed.

Fig. B26

Example showing concentrated loads distributed over different lengths of supporting surface and loads resting on
two separate supports (bearing width ≥ 2m)

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/123

Fig. B27

Example showing concentrated loads distributed over different lengths of supporting surface and loads resting on
two separate supports (bearing width ≥ 1,20 m)

L 344/124

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Fig. B28

Example showing concentrated loads distributed over different lengths of supporting surface (bearing width ≥ 2m)

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/125

Fig. B29

Example showing concentrated loads distributed over different lengths of supporting surface (bearing width
≥ 1,20 m)

B.22. DISTANCES BETWEEN OUTER WHEELSETS OR BOGIE CENTRES

(Location: to the right of each solebar)

On non-bogie wagons, the distance between end-axles, on bogie wagons the distance between bogie-centres, must be
indicated using the marking as shown below.

Fig. B30

L 344/126

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

B.23. WAGONS WHICH NEED SPECIAL CARE IN SHUNTING (E.G BI MODAL UNIT)

On wagons, which need special care in shunting, or end bogies in intermodal traffic, the marking as shown below means
that :

— Fly-shunting or gravity-shunting not permitted,

— Must be accompanied by a traction unit,

— Must not be loose-shunted.

Fig. B31

B.24. MANUALLY APPLIED PARKING BRAKE

Fig. B32

B.25. INSTRUCTIONS AND SAFETY ADVICES FOR SPECIAL EQUIPMENTS

Wagons fitted with special equipment (automatic discharging, opening roof, etc.), must have instructions concerning
operation of this equipment and the safety precautions to be taken, placed in a prominent position and if possible in several
languages; these instructions may be accompanied by appropriate pictograms;

B.26. NUMBERING OF WHEELSETS

On the solebar of the wagon, a numerical reference of the axle above each axle-box, corresponding to the position of the
axle counted in increasing order from a selected wagon extremity shall be indicated.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/127

B.27. BRAKING MARKINGS ON WAGONS

B.27.1. Inscriptions denoting the type of air brake

The inscriptions showing the types of continuous brake, to be put on vehicles, must comply with the abbreviated
descriptions reproduced below. For the meaning of these brake modes see the TSI, section 4.2.4.1.2.2.

Brake mode
Brake mode
Brake mode
GP changeover system (or device)
PR changeover system (or device)
G/P/R changeover system (or device)
Braking device varying automatically and progressively in relation to the load

G
P
R
GP
PR
GPR
A

B.27.2. Marking of the braked mass on vehicles

In the following figs the letter ‘x’ corresponds to the mass and the letter ‘y’ to the changeover braked mass. The letter
frame corresponds to the variable braked mass which are shown in the windows.

in a

B.27.2.1. Vehicles not fitted with changeover devices.

The braked mass shall be inscribed on the solebars near the inscription of the braking system as shown in Fig. B33.

Fig. B33

B.27.2.2. Vehicles fitted with manual changeover equipment

— ‘Freight-passenger’ G/P changeover equipment

In the case of vehicles fitted with ‘freight-passenger’ G/P changeover equipment, the changeover from one system to another
must be made using a lever with end-knob as shown in Fig. B34.

In the ‘freight’ G braking mode, the lever must slope upwards to the left.

In the ‘passenger’ P braking mode, the lever must slope upwards to the right.

The braked masses are inscribed on the plate behind the changeover lever, beside each lever position when in ‘goods’ G or
‘passenger’ P.

Fig. B34

— Vehicles fitted with an ‘empty-loaded’ changeover device.

The braked masses and changeover masses shall be inscribed on the ‘empty-loaded’ changeover plates. The braked masses
shall not be inscribed close to the levers of other changeover devices.

If there are only the ‘empty-loaded’ changeover and solely two positions of the reversing lever (the ‘empty’ braking system
and one ‘loaded’ braking system only), the braked masses must be shown on a plate in front of which the lever moves, on
the right and left of the plate axis, close to the corresponding position of this lever. The changeover mass must be shown

L 344/128

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

under the lever axis or between the two braked masses mentioned above. (see Fig. B35).

Fig. B35

If there is the ‘empty-loaded’ changeover alone and several positions of the lever (the ‘empty’ braking system and several
‘loaded’ braking systems) the braked mass corresponding to each position of the lever is inscribed in a window, fitted at the
top, in the middle of the plate behind which the lever moves. (see Fig. B36).

Fig. B36

It is also possible to use the device given in Fig. B37, in which the braked masses are permanently inscribed beside each
position of the lever.

Fig. B37

The changeover masses shall be inscribed on the plate under the lever axis. A pointer fixed on the lever, which moves in
front of the plate, shows, for each position of the lever, the corresponding changeover mass. (see Fig. B36 and B37).

B.27.2.3. Vehicles having two or more sets of brake equipment with separate ‘empty-loaded’ devices.

On both plates of each ‘empty-loaded’ device shall be inscribed the braked mass relative to the part of the equipment
controlled by this device and the changeover mass corresponding to the whole vehicle according to B.27.2.2.

B.27.2.4. Vehicles fitted with a braking device varying automatically and progressively as the load varies.

These vehicles shall bear an inscription, similar to that shown in Fig. B38 in the vicinity of each lever.

Fig. B38

On vehicles with more than one distributor (e.g. multiple wagons), the braked mass obtained for each distributor shall be
entered in brackets after the total braked mass (e.g. for three distributors: MAX 203t (80t + 43t + 80t)).

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/129

Each distributor isolating cock shall carry details of the brake mass corresponding to the distributor in question as well as
the symbol denoting ‘pneumatic brake in use’; see Fig. B39.

Fig. B39

In addition, the braked axle numbers assigned to the distributor isolating cock shall be entered in a frame; see Fig B40.

Fig. B40

B.27.2.5. Wagons fitted with devices for the automatic control of the ‘empty-loaded’ apparatus.

The braked masses and the changeover mass shall be inscribed on a special panel or on the sole bar:

at the top, on the left: the braked mass of the empty wagon,

at the top, on the right: the braked mass of the loaded wagon,

at the bottom, in the middle: the changeover mass.

Wagons with braked masses in the ‘freight’ G position which differ from those in the ‘passenger’ P position, shall bear a full
inscription close to the two positions of the ‘G-P’ changeover lever; see Fig B41.

Fig. B41

L 344/130

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Wagons with identical braked masses in the ‘freight’ G position and in the ‘passenger’ P position, shall bear the inscriptions
as shown in Fig. B42 close to the ‘G-P’ changeover lever.

Fig. B42

Wagons with only the ‘freight’ G position or the ‘passenger’ P position shall be marked as shown in Fig. B43.

Fig. B43

B.27.3. Others marking concerning the braking

The following markings must be located in the centre of each solebar.

B.27.3.1. Marking denoting the installation of a high power R brake system with brake mode ‘R’

Fig. B44

B.27.3.2. Marking denoting a brake with composite brake-shoe inserts

Fig. B45

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/131

B.27.3.3. Marking denoting disc brakes

The instructions for checking the condition of the brakes must be indicated.

Fig. B46

B.28. WAGON WITH AUTOMATIC COUPLER UNDER OSSHD STANDARD

Fig. B47

L 344/132

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

B.29. PLATE ‘PERMISSION TO OPERATE ON 1 520 MM TRACKS’

Fig. B48

B.30. WAGON WITH VARIABLE-GAUGE WHEELSETS (1 435 MM/1 520 MM)

Fig. B49

B.31. Marking on bogies with variable-gauge wheelsets (1 435 mm/1 520 mm)

Fig B50

B.32. MARKING OF WAGONS AND COACHES BUILT TO GAUGES GA, GB OR GC

Remains as an Open Point

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/133

ANNEX C

VEHICLE TRACK INTERACTION AND GAUGING

Kinematic Gauge

C.1.

C.2.

SCOPE OF APPLICATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

138

GENERAL PART . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

138

C.2.1.

List of notations used . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

138

C.2.2.

Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

140

C.2.2.1.

Normal co-ordinates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

140

C.2.2.2.

Reference profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

140

C.2.2.3.

Geometric overthrow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

140

C.2.2.4.

Roll centre C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

140

C.2.2.5.

Asymmetry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

141

C.2.2.6.

Maximum construction gauge for rolling stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

141

C.2.2.7.

Kinematic gauge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

142

C.2.2.8.

Quasi-static movements z . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

142

C.2.2.9.

S projections (Fig.C5)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

142

C.2.2.10.

Ei or Ea reductions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

142

C.2.2.11.

Lineside structure gauge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

143

C.2.3.

General comments on the method for obtaining the maximum rolling stock construction gauge . . .

143

C.2.3.1.

Relative positions of the various gauges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

144

C.2.4.

Rules for the reference profile for determining the maximum rolling stock construction gauge . . . . .

145

C.2.4.1.

Vertical movements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

145

C.2.4.1.1.

Determination of minimum heights above the running surface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

145

C.2.4.1.2.

Passing over vertical transition curves (including marshalling yard humps) and over braking, shunting
or stopping devices. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

146

C.2.4.1.3. Determination of maximum heights above the running surface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

151

C.2.4.2.

Lateral movements (D) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

152

C.2.4.2.1.

Vehicle running position on the track and displacement factor (A) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

152

C.2.4.2.2.

Special cases of multiple units and coaches fitted with a reversing cab (driving trailer) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

155

C.2.4.2.3. Quasi-static movement (z) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

155

L 344/134

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

C.2.5.

Determination of reductions by calculation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

156

C.2.5.1.

Terms taken into account in calculating movements (D)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

156

C.2.5.1.1.

Terms concerning the running position of the vehicle on a curve (geometric overthrow) . . . . . . . . . . .

156

C.2.5.1.2. Group of terms concerning lateral play . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

157

C.2.5.1.3. Quasi-static movements (term concerning vehicle['s] inclination [leaning] on its suspension and its
asymmetry when this is greater than 1o) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

157

C.3.

GAUGE G1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

158

C.3.1.

Reference profile for static gauge G1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

159

C.3.1.1.

Reduction formulae . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

159

C.3.2.

Reference profile for kinematic gauge G1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

160

C.3.2.1.

Part common to all vehicles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

160

C.3.2.2.

Part below 130 mm on vehicles which must not pass over shunting humps or negotiate rail brakes and
other activated shunting and stopping devices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

C.3.2.3.

Part below 130 mm for vehicles able to pass over shunting humps and negotiate rail brakes and other
activated shunting and stopping devices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

161

162

C.3.2.3.1. Use of shunting devices on curved track sections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

162

C.3.3.

Permitted projections So (S) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

163

C.3.4.

Reduction formulae . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

164

C.3.4.1.

Reduction formulae applicable to powered vehicles (dimensions in metres) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

164

C.3.4.2.

Reduction formulae applicable to multiple units (dimensions in metres) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

166

C.3.4.3.

Reduction formulae applicable to coaches and passenger vehicles (dimensions in metres) . . . . . . . . . . .

167

C.3.4.4.

Reduction formulae applicable to wagons (dimensions in metres)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

169

C.3.5.

Reference profile for pantographs and non-insulated live parts on the roof . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

171

C.3.6.

Rules for the reference profile for determining the maximum rolling stock construction gauge . . . . .

171

C.3.6.1.

Powered units fitted with pantographs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

171

C.3.6.2.

Railcars fitted with pantographs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

173

C.3.6.3.

Pantographs in lowered position . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

173

C.3.6.4.

Insulation clearance margin for 25kV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

173

C.4.

GA, GB, GC VEHICLE GAUGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

173

C.4.1.

Static gauge reference profiles and associated rules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

173

C.4.1.1.

GA and GB static gauges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

174

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/135

C.4.1.2.

GC static gauge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

175

C.4.2.

Kinematic gauge reference profiles and associated rules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

175

C.4.2.1.

Tractive units (except railcars and multiple unit motor coaches) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

176

C.4.2.1.1.

GA and GB kinematic gauges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

176

C.4.2.1.2. GC kinematic gauge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

178

C.4.2.2.

Railcars and multiple unit motor coaches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

178

C.4.2.2.1. GA and GB kinematic gauges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

178

C.4.2.2.2. GC kinematic gauge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

179

C.4.2.3.

Passenger coaches and luggage vans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

179

C.4.2.3.1. GA and GB kinematic gauges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

179

C.4.2.3.2. GC kinematic gauge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

181

C.4.2.4.

Wagons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

181

C.4.2.4.1. GA and GB kinematic gauges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

181

C.4.2.4.2. GC kinematic gauge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

183

C.5.

GAUGES REQUIRING BI- OR MULTILATERAL AGREEMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

183

C.5.1.

G2 gauge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

183

C.5.1.1.

Reference profile of G2 static gauge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

183

C.5.1.2.

Reference profile of G2 kinematic gauge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

185

C.5.2.

GB1 and GB2 gauges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

185

C.5.2.1.

General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

185

C.5.2.2.

GB1 and GB2 static reference profiles (loading gauges)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

186

C.5.2.3.

Rules for GB1 and GB2 static reference profiles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

187

C.5.2.4.

GB1 and GB2 kinematic reference profiles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

187

C.5.2.5.

Rules for GB1 and GB2 kinematic reference profiles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

188

C.5.3.

Gauge 3.3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

188

C.5.3.1.

General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

188

C.5.3.2.

Reference profile of 3.3 kinematic gauge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

189

L 344/136

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

C.5.3.3.

Rules for the reference profile to determine the maximum construction gauge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

189

C.5.3.3.1.

Permitted projections So (S) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

189

C.5.3.3.2. Quasi-static displacements z . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

190

C.5.3.4.

Reduction formulae . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

190

C.5.3.4.1.

Reduction formulae applicable to tractive units (dimensions in metres) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

190

C.5.3.4.2.

Reduction formulae applicable to multiple units (dimensions in metres)* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

191

C.5.3.4.3.

Reduction formulae applicable to coaches and other passenger vehicles (dimensions in metres) . . . . .

192

C.5.4.

Gauge GB-M6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

194

C.5.4.1.

General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

194

C.5.4.2.

Reference profile of the GB-M6 kinematic gauge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

195

C.5.4.3.

Reduction formulae . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

195

C.5.4.3.1.

Tractive vehicles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

195

C.5.4.3.2. Hauled vehicles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

197

C.6.

APPENDIX 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

198

C.6.1.

Rolling Stock Loading Gauge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

198

C.6.1.1.

Conditions concerning doors, steps and footboards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

198

C.7.

APPENDIX 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

199

C.7.1.

Rolling Stock Loading Gauge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

199

C.7.1.1.

Compression of the suspensions for areas outside the support polygon B, C and D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

199

C.8.

APPENDIX 3 ROLLING STOCK LOADING GAUGE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

201

C.8.1.

Calculation of the loading gauge of tilting vehicles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

201

C.8.1.1.

General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

201

C.8.1.2.

Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

201

C.8.1.3.

Field of application . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

202

C.8.1.4.

Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

202

C.8.1.5.

Conditions related to safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

202

C.8.1.6.

Symbols used . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

202

C.8.2.

Basic conditions to determine the loading gauge of TBV units . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

202

C.8.2.1.

Types of body tilting systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

203

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/137

C.8.3.

Analysis of the formulae . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

204

C.8.3.1.

Basic formulae . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

204

C.8.3.2.

Modifications to be made to the formulae for TBVs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

204

C.8.3.2.1.

Expression for the values of the lateral plays when the body is tilted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

204

C.8.3.2.2. Quasi-static displacement of a TBV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

205

C.8.3.2.2.1. Expression of the quasi-static displacements zP for the reductions on the inside of the curve . . . . . . .

205

C.8.3.2.2.2. Expression of the quasi-static displacements zP, for the reductions on the outer side of the curve . . .

206

C.8.3.2.3. ACTIVE systems: displacements due to body rotation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

208

C.8.4.

Associated Rules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

209

C.8.5.

Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

209

C.8.5.1.

Condition for adjusting the inclination (TBV units with active system) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

209

C.8.5.2.

Condition concerning the speed of TBV units . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

210

C.8.6.

Appendix 4 Rolling Stock Loading Gauge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

210

L 344/138

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

C.1.

SCOPE OF APPLICATION

The loading gauges available in different countries are classified as follows:

— Gauge allowed with no restriction: G1

The target gauge, available on all lines (except the UK, see Annex T)

— Gauge whose free use is limited to certain, precisely specified routes: Gauges GA, GB, GC

— Gauges the use of which must be covered by a prior agreement between the Infrastructure Managers concerned:

Gauges G2, 3.3, GB-M6, GB1, GB2, etc.

— Loads carried on wagons

For the loads carried on wagons, only the load profiles and the loading methods set down in Appendix 6 shall be
accepted.

— Combined transport

For the requirements of combined transport traffic, using load units of well-defined volume (swap bodies, containers
and semi-trailers) on specified wagons (Ref. PTU chapter 3.2.1).

— Interoperable high-speed vehicles.

The vehicles of high-speed trainsets that are interoperable within the European Community shall be built to the
loading gauges prescribed in Section 4.1.4 of the Rolling Stock TSI.

— Rolling stock equipped with cant deficiency compensation systems

Such rolling stock shall be checked by the method set down in Appendix 3.

— Pantographs

The space envelope of the pantographs and roof-mounted equipment shall be checked according to Chapter 4.2.2.5.

— OSSJD loading gauges

OSSJD member states use particular loading gauges. As soon as the technical and application documents become
available, the corresponding text shall be the subject of Appendix 7

— Doors and steps

The rules pertaining to doors and steps are set down in Appendix 1.

— Compression of suspensions for the zones located outside the support polygon B — C — D

The rules are given in Appendix 2.

— Utilisation of the existing margins available on the infrastructure by vehicles with defined parameters

Such rolling stock shall be checked by the method given in Appendix 4.

C.2.

GENERAL PART

C.2.1.

List of notations used

A
a
b
b1
b2
bG
bw
C
d

dga
dgi
D

: angular displacement coefficient of bogie
:distance between the end axles of vehicles not fitted with bogies or between the pivots of bogie vehicles (see Note)
: half width of the vehicle (see diagram in Appendix 2)
: half distance between the primary suspension springs (see diagram in Appendix 2)
: half distance between the secondary suspension springs (see diagram in Appendix 2)
: half distance between the side-bearers
: half width of the pantograph bow
: roll centre (see Figure 3)
: the outer distance between the wheel flanges measured at a point 10 millimetres below the running treads, with
the flanges worn to the permissible limit, the absolute limit being 1,410 m. This limit may vary according to the
maintenance criteria for the vehicle under consideration
: outer curve overthrow
: inner curve overthrow
: lateral movement

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/139

Ea

Ei

E'a

E'i

E"a

E"i

ea

ei

f

h

hc

ht

J

: external reduction

: internal reduction

: external deviation in relation to the movement authorised at the pantograph upper verification point (6,5 m)

: internal deviation in relation to the movement authorised at the pantograph upper verification point (6,5 m)

: external deviation in relation to the movement authorised at the pantograph lower verification point (5,0 m)

: internal deviation in relation to the movement authorised at the pantograph lower verification point (5,0 m)

: external vertical reduction at the lower part of vehicles

: internal vertical reduction at the lower part of vehicles

: vertical sag (see Appendix 2)

: height in relation to the running surface

: height of the roll centre of the transverse cross-section of the vehicle in relation to the running surface

: installation height of the pantograph lower articulation in relation to the running surface

: side-bearers play

J'a, J'i

: difference between the movements resulting from the calculation and movements due to play effects

l

n

na

ni

nμ

p

p'

q

R

Rv

s

S

So

t

w

w∞

wa

wi

: track gauge

: distance between the section considered and the adjacent end axle or nearest pivot (see Note)

: n for the sections located outside the axles or bogie pivots

: n for the sections located between the axles or bogie pivots

: distance of the section considered to the motor bogie pivot of multiple units (see Note)

: bogie wheel base

: trailer bogie wheel base for multiple units

: lateral play between axle and bogie frame or between axle and vehicle body in the case of axle vehicles

: level curve radius

: vertical curve radius

: vehicle flexibility coefficient

: projection

: maximum projection

: pantograph flexibility index: lateral movements expressed in metres to which the bow is subjected when raised to
6,50 m under the effect of a 300 N lateral force

: lateral play between bogie and vehicle body

: lateral play between the bogie and the vehicle body on straight track

: lateral play between the bogie and vehicle body on the outside of the curve

: lateral play between the bogie and vehicle body on the inside of the curve

wa(R)

:lateral play between the bogie and vehicle body on the outside of an R radius curve

:lateral play between the bogie and vehicle body on the inside of an R radius curve
wi(R)
w'∞ — w'a — w'i — w'a(R) — w'i(R) are the same for the trailer bogies of multiple units.
xa
xi
y
z
z'

: additional reduction for extra-long vehicles outside the bogie pivots
: additional reduction for extra-long vehicles between the bogie pivots
: distance from the effective pivot to the geometric centre of the bogie (see Note)
: deviation in relation to the median position due to quasi-static inclination and to dissymetry
: difference between the lateral inclination based on calculation and the actual inclination of the pantograph upper
verification point
: difference between the lateral inclination based on calculation and the actual inclination of the pantograph lower
verification point
: additional vehicle body inclination due to side-bearers play
: inclination of canted track (see figure 3)
: angle of vehicle asymmetry due to construction tolerances, to suspension adjustment and to uneven load
distributions (in degrees)
: suspension adjustment tolerance:
adjustment imperfections when the vehicle is resting empty on level track (in radians)
: rail-wheel adhesion coefficient
: pantograph construction and installation tolerance: deviation tolerated between the vehicle body centre line and
the middle of the bow presumed to be raised to 6,5 m without any lateral stress
: In the case of vehicles without fixed bogie pivots, in order to determine the a and n values, the meeting point of
the bogie longitudinal centre line with that of the vehicle body will be considered as a fictional pivot, determined
graphically, when the vehicle is on a 150 m radius curve, the play effects being evenly distributed and the axles
centred on the track: if y is the distance of the fictional pivot from the geometric centre of the bogie (at equal
distance from the end axles), p2 will be replaced by (p2 − y2) and p'2 by (p02 − y2) in the formulae.

inclination which the vehicle body may attain as a result of suspension

z"

α
δ
ηο

θ

μ
τ

Note

L 344/140

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

C.2.2.

Definitions

C.2.2.1.

Normal co-ordinates

The expression ‘normal co-ordinates’ is used for orthogonal axes defined in a plane normal to the centreline of the track in
nominal position; one of these axes, sometimes called horizontal, is the intersection of the specified plane and the running
surface; the other is the perpendicular to this intersection at equal distance from the rails.

For calculation purposes, this centreline and the vehicle centreline must be considered as coincident in order to be able to
compare the vehicle construction gauges and the lineside structure limit gauges, both calculated on the basis of the
kinematic gauge reference profile which is common to both.

Fig. C1

C.2.2.2.

Reference profile

Profile related to the normal co-ordinates, always accompanied by associated rules used, for rolling stock, to define the
vehicle maximum construction gauge.

C.2.2.3.

Geometric overthrow

The expression geometric overthrow means, for an element of a vehicle located on a radius R curve, the difference between
the distance from this element to the track centreline and that which would exist on straight track, the axles being, in both
cases, placed in a median position on the track, the play also being evenly distributed, the vehicle symmetrical and not tilted
on its suspensions; in other words, it is that part of the vehicle element offset which is due to the track curvature.

On the same side of the track centreline, all the points in the same vehicle body cross-section have the same geometric
overthrow.

Fig.C2

C.2.2.4.

Roll centre C

When the vehicle body is subjected to a lateral force parallel to the running surface (gravity component, see figure 3a, or
centrifugal force, see figure 3b) it tilts on its suspensions.

If the vehicle lateral play and the effect on its dampers have reached their limits in this condition, the XX' centreline of a
lateral section takes up a X1X'1 position.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/141

In routine cases of vehicle lateral movements, the position of point C is independent of the lateral force involved. Point C is
known as the roll centre of the vehicle and its distance hc from the running surface is known as the height of the roll centre.

The value hc can be measured or calculated. In the case of extreme vehicle/bogie positions for calculating the maximum
construction gauge, this height hc must be taken at one of the vehicle body/bogie bump stops concerned (centre or
rotational stops); in the case where it can be neither measured nor calculated, hc should be taken as equal to 0,5 m.

Fig.C3

C.2.2.5.

Asymmetry

The asymmetry of a vehicle is defined as the angle ηo that would be formed between the vertical and the centreline of the
body of a stationary vehicle on level track in the absence of friction (see Figure 3c).

Asymmetry may result from constructional defects, unevenly adjusted suspension (scotching, side-bearers, pneumatic
levelling valves, etc.) and from an off-centre load.

2.2.6.

Coefficient of flexibility s (see Fig. C3)

Whenever a stationary vehicle is placed on a canted track whose running surface lies at an angle δ to the horizontal, its body
leans on its suspensions and forms an angle η with the perpendicular to the rail level. The vehicle flexibility coefficient s is
defined by the ratio:

s ¼

η
δ

This ratio may be calculated or measured (see UIC Leaflet 505-5). It depends in particular on the load state of the vehicle.

Powered units of constant weight: Locomotives, etc: Unladen state in running order

Vehicles with non-constant weight: Multiple units, coaches, vans, coaches with driving cab, etc.

Unladen state in running order and exceptional load state (maximum load state)

Vehicles with non-constant weight: Wagons: Unladen state in running order and maximum load state

C.2.2.6.

Maximum construction gauge for rolling stock

The maximum construction gauge is the maximum profile, obtained by applying the rules giving reductions in relation to
the reference profile, which the various parts of the rolling stock must respect. These reductions depend on the geometric
characteristics of the rolling stock in question, the position of the cross-section in relation to the bogie pivot or to the axles,

L 344/142

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

the height of the point considered in relation to the running surface, constructional play, the maximum wear allowance and
the elastic characteristics of the suspension.

In general, the effective construction gauge uses only partially the non-hatched areas within the maximum construction
gauge for the installation of foot-steps, hand-rails, etc.

Fig. C4

C.2.2.7.

Kinematic gauge

This covers the furthest positions in relation to the centres of the normal co-ordinates likely to be taken by various parts of
rolling stock, taking into account the most unfavourable positions of the axles on the track, the lateral play and quasi-static
movements attributable to the rolling stock and to the track.

The kinematic gauge does not take account of certain random factors (oscillations, asymmetry, if ηo ≤ 1o): the suspended
parts of the vehicles may therefore exceed the kinematic gauge in the course of oscillation. Such movements are taken into
account by the Way and Works Department.

C.2.2.8.

Quasi-static movements z

‘z’ is the part of lateral movements attributable to the rolling stock (when there is a 50 mm cant deficiency) and resulting
from the technology and flexibility of the suspensions (flexibility coefficient s), under the effect of centrifugal force not
compensated for by cant or of excessive cant (see Figure 3a or 3b) and under the effect of asymmetry ηo (see Figure 3c). This
value depends on the height h of the point in question.

C.2.2.9.

S projections (Fig.C5)

Part outside the reference profile when the vehicle is on a curve and/or on track with a gauge wider than 1,435 m.s

The half-width of the vehicle, plus the D movements, minus the half-width of the reference profile at the same level, is
equivalent to the actual projection S in relation to the reference profile.

Also see Section 2.3‘Permitted projections’.

C.2.2.10.

Ei or Ea reductions

To ensure that a vehicle when on the track does not exceed the ‘vehicle limit position’ in view of its D movements, the half-
width dimensions must be subject to an Ei or Ea reduction, in relation to the reference profile, such that:

Ei or Ea ≥ D — So.

The following distinction is made:

— Ei

— Ea

: reduction value for the reference profile half-width dimensions for the sections located between the end axles of
vehicles not mounted on bogies or between the pivots of vehicles mounted on bogies
: reduction value for the reference profile half-width dimensions for the sections beyond the end axles of vehicles
not mounted on bogies or the pivots of vehicles mounted on bogies.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/143

C.2.2.11.

Lineside structure gauge

Profile in relation to the axes of co-ordinates normal to the track, inside which no structure must penetrate despite elastic or
non-elastic track movements.

C.2.3.

General comments on the method for obtaining the maximum rolling stock construction gauge

The study of the maximum construction gauge takes into account both the lateral and vertical movements of the rolling
stock, drawn up on the basis of the geometrical and suspension characteristics of the vehicle under various loading
conditions.

In general, the maximum construction gauge of a vehicle is determined for the ni or na values which correspond to the
middle of the vehicle and the headstocks. It is of course necessary to check all the projecting points, as well as those which,
in view of their location, are likely to be in close proximity to the vehicle construction maximum gauge within the section
under consideration.

Transversally, taking into account the vehicle body movements obtained for a point located on an ni or na section at height
h in relation to the running surface, the half-widths of the maximum vehicle construction gauge shall be at the most equal to
the corresponding half-widths of the reference profile, specific to each type of vehicle, decreased by the Ei or Ea reductions.

These reductions must satisfy the relationship Ei or Ea ≥ D — So in which:

— D represents the movements whose values are calculated by the formulae given in Para. 1.4.2.

— So represents the maximum projections, the values of which are shown in Para. 2.3 ‘Permitted projections’.

L 344/144

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

C.2.3.1.

Relative positions of the various gauges

Fig.C5 shows the position of the various gauges in relation to each other, as well as the main elements involved in
determining the rolling stock maximum construction gauge.

Fig. C5

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/145

C.2.4.

Rules for the reference profile for determining the maximum rolling stock construction gauge

In order to determine the maximum construction gauge of a vehicle, the Rules for the reference profiles must take account
of:

— vertical movements,

— transverse movements.

Construction tolerances are partly taken into account in the asymmetry calculation.

The nominal width value of a vehicle is obtained from the dimensions of the maximum constructional profile.

Tolerance values must not be used systematically to increase vehicle dimensions.

C.2.4.1.

Vertical movements

For the vehicle or for a given part, these movements make it possible to determine a minimum height and a maximum
height above the running surface; this is particularly the case for:

— parts located towards the lower section of the gauge (low parts);

— the step at 1 170 mm from the running surface on the reference profile;

— parts located at the upper part of the vehicles.

It should be noted that for all parts located at a height greater than 400 mm above the running surface, the vertical
component of the quasi-static movements is not taken into account.

C.2.4.1.1.

D e t e r m i n a t i o n o f m i n i m u m h e i g h t s a b o v e t h e r u n n i n g s u r f a c e

The minimum heights above the running surface for parts located towards the lower part of the gauge (1 170 mm and
below) are determined with account being taken of the vertical movements described in the following paragraphs.

When studying the sag of the vehicle bodies (also see Appendix 2) the division shown in the diagram below shall be
considered.

Fig. C6

Sags independent of the load state and of the suspension state

These deflections shall be considered for all vehicle body zones A, B, C and D, and concern the following parts:

— Wheels :
— Various parts :

— Axle boxes :
— Bogie frame :
— Body structures :

maximum wear for all types of vehicles
maximum wear — Examples: side-bearers, brake rigging, etc, for all vehicles and for each special
assembly
wear ignored
manufacturing tolerances giving rise to deflection in relation to the nominal dimensions: ignored
manufacturing tolerances giving rise to deflection in relation to the nominal dimensions: ignored
for all vehicles including all conventional and special wagons.

L 344/146

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Deflection dependent on the load state of the vehicles and on the state of their suspension

1 — Structural distortions: sags for all the vehicle body zones A, B, C, and D.

— Axles
— Bogie frame
— Body

Deflection ignored
Deflection ignored
Transverse deflection
Twist
Longitudinal deflection

2 — Deflection of the suspensions

Types of springs:

ignored
ignored
ignored for all vehicles, except wagons for
which the longitudinal sag must be taken
into account under the effect of a maximum
load increased by 30 % to take dynamic
stresses into consideration.

The primary and secondary suspensions are formed of various types of springs for which the deflections must be taken into
account:

— Steel spring

Deflection under static load,

Additional deflection under dynamic stress,

— Rubber spring
— Pneumatic spring

Deflection due to flexibility tolerances.
Same deflections as for steel springs
Total deflection with cushions deflated (including back-up suspension when it exists)

— Suspension deflection conditions

— Equal and simultaneous deflections on the suspensions (zones A, B, C and D are concerned).

— ‘Conventional’ wagons: total deflection (bottoming).

— Special wagons: deflection under the effect of a 30 % overload on the sprung weight (in order to make
maximum use of the gauge, especially in the case of combined transport or of bulky loads) or
total deflection (bottoming).

— Other deflections see Appendix 3.

C.2.4.1.2.

P a s s i n g o v e r v e r t i c a l
o v e r b r a k i n g , s h u n t i n g o r s t o p p i n g d e v i c e s .

t r a n s i t i o n c u r v e s ( i n c l u d i n g m a r s h a l l i n g y a r d h u m p s ) a n d

a)

Vehicles with a reference profile (part below 130 mm) in accordance with paragraph C.3.2.3

Normal values for the ei or ea vertical reductions to be taken into account for empty coaches, empty or loaded vans and
wagons.

These vehicles, when they can be gravity shunted, must be capable of passing over activated rail brakes and other shunting
or stopping devices located on non-vertically curved track and reaching the 115 and 125 mm dimensions above the running
surface, up to 3 m from the end of convex transition curves of radius Rv ≥ 250 m (dimension d).

They must also be able to pass over such devices located inside or near concave transitions curves of radius Rv ≥ 300 m.

In applying these conditions, the lower dimensions of these vehicles, taking into account vertical movements, assessed as
stated in paragraph § 1.4.1, must in relation to the running surface be at least equal to 115 or 125 mm increased by the
following ei or ea quantities:

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/147

Fig.C7

ei or ea : vertical reduction at the lower part of the rolling stock equipment in relation to the 115 or 125 mm dimensions.

ev

: lowering of the rail brakes in relation to the 115 or 125 mm dimensions.

For sections between the end axles or bogie pivots (normal values expressed in metres) The purpose of the numerical index
applied to the ei and E'i values is to distinguish the normal values from the reduced values:

ei1 ¼

ð

n
:
a

Þ2

a − n − 3
500

when a (cid:20) 17,80 m and n <

a − 3
n

ei1 ¼

Þ3
a − 3
ð
3375a

wh when a (cid:20) 17,80 m and n (cid:21)

a − 3
3

(1)

(cid:20)

27
4

:

(cid:21)

n
a − 3

h
1 −

i
2

n
a − 3

(cid:20)

a2
3375

ei1 ¼

(cid:21)

− 0,04

when a > 17,80 m and n <

a − 3
3

− 0,04 when a > 17,80 m and n (cid:21)

a − 3
3

(1)

ei1 ¼

a2
3375

NOTES

(1)

This formula for n (cid:21)

a − 3
3

gives reductions greater than or equal to those resulting from the formula for n <

a − 3
3

When empty coaches and empty or loaded wagons and vans can be gravity shunted, they must also be able to pass over
convex transition curves of radius ≥ 250 m, without any part other than the wheel flange descending below the running
surface.

This condition, which concerns the central part of the vehicles, is in addition to those resulting from the ei formulae for long
vehicles.

L 344/148

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Fig. C8

For sections located beyond the end axles or bogie pivots (values in metres)

Fig. C9

Reduced values for the ei increase (sections between the end axles or bogie pivots) to be considered for certain vehicles for
passing over gradient transition curves including shunting humps.

These reduced values are only tolerated for certain types of wagon, insofar as they require a larger space than that
determined using the normal values. These are, for example, the recess wagons used in rail/road combined traffic, and other
identical or similar designs.

Use of these reduced values may require special precautions to be taken in certain marshalling yards with hump retarders at
the base of a shunting gradient.

For these vehicles, the value of dimension d becomes 5 m.

Fig. C10

(reduced values expressed in metres)

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/149

ei2 ¼

ð

n
:
a

Þ2

a − n − 5
500

when a (cid:20) 15,80 m and n <

a − 5
3

ei2 ¼

Þ3
a − 5
ð
3375a

when a (cid:20) 15,80 m and n (cid:21)

a − 5
3

(cid:20)

27
4

:

ei2

(cid:21)

n
a − 5

h

1 −

i

n
a − 5

2

(cid:20)

a2
3375

(cid:21)

− 0,05

when a > 15,80 m and n <

a − 5
3

− 0,05 when a > 15,80 m and n (cid:21)

a − 5
3

(1)

ei2 ¼

a2
3375

NOTES

(1)

This formula for n (cid:21)

a − 5
3

gives reductions greater than or equal to those obtained using the formula for n <

a − 5
3

When they can be gravity shunted, the wagons must also be able to pass over convex transition curves with a radius greater
than or equal to 250 m, without any part other than the wheel flange descending below the running surface.

This condition, which concerns the central part of the wagons, is in addition to those resulting from the ei formulae for long
wagons.

Fig. C11

L 344/150

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

For bogies a = p.

Table C1 showing the values of Ei and E'i expressed in mm with a and n expressed in m.

b)

Vehicles not allowed on shunting humps by reason of their length

Empty coaches, wagons suitable for international traffic and empty or loaded vans that are not allowed over marshalling
yard humps on account of their length, must nonetheless respect the profile in paragraph C.3.2.3 when placed on a non-
vertically curved track, so as to allow for the use of shunting or stopping devices.

c)

All vehicles

All vehicles must be able to pass over convex or concave transition curves of radius Rv ≥ 500 m, without any part other
than the wheel flange descending below the running surface.

This may concern mainline vehicles whose:

— wheelbase is greater than 17,8 m,

— overhang is greater than 3,4 m.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/151

d)

Special cases

Account must be taken of the following particular cases:

— Vertical transition curves for vehicles fitted with the automatic coupler.

— Angle of inclination for vehicles used on ferries.

C.2.4.1.3. D e t e r m i n a t i o n o f m a x i m u m h e i g h t s a b o v e t h e r u n n i n g s u r f a c e

The value of vertical movements to be taken into consideration, as regards the upper parts of rolling stock where h ≥ 3 250
mm, is determined with account being taken of the upward dynamic movements for empty rolling stock in running order
without wear.

In this part, the vehicles come close to the reference profile under the influence of:

1)

2)

3)

upward oscillations,

the vertical component of the quasi-static inclination,

transverse movements.

Consequently, the vertical dimensions of the reference profile must be reduced by the values generated by these movements
ξ, if they can be calculated, or otherwise by a fixed value of 15 mm per suspension stage.

Nevertheless, it must be noted that when the vehicle is subject to quasi-static inclination, the side opposite the inclination
rises but at the same time moves away from the reference profile in such a way that no interference is to be feared.
Conversely, on the side of the inclination, the vehicle lowers, thus compensating part of the upward movements.

As an approximation, for cant excess or deficiency of 50 mm, this vertical reduction ΔV(h) of the reference profile for
nominal heights greater than h=3,25 m is expressed as:

ΔVðhÞ ¼ ξ −

1
2

(cid:20)
8
>><
>>:

LCRðhÞ − Ei or a

30

(cid:21)
9
>>=
s
>>;

where:

1
2

LCRðhÞ represents the half-width of the reference profile,

Ei or Ea the transverse reductions,

s the vehiclE's coefficient of flexibility,

ξ the vehicle resilience (fixed or calculated term).

Example: for a vehicle with a reduction Ei or Ea of 217 mm based on h = 3,25 m, we obtain:

Reductions for cut-away sides on the upper part of the reference profile.

L 344/152

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Fig. C12

C.2.4.2.

Lateral movements (D)

These movements are the sum of the following movements:

— geometric movements resulting from the vehicle running through curves and straight track (projections, lateral play,

etc.), where the vehicle centreline is considered to be perpendicular to the running surface;

— quasi-static movements resulting from the inclination of the suspended parts under the influence of gravity (canted

track) and/or centrifugal acceleration (curved track).

— lateral sag of the vehicle body is generally disregarded except for those special types of wagon or heavily-laden wagons

for which these values are particularly high.

C.2.4.2.1.

Ve h i c l e r u n n i n g p o s i t i o n o n t h e t r a c k a n d d i s p l a c e m e n t

f a c t o r ( A )

The various vehicle running positions on the track depend on the transverse play of the various parts connecting the vehicle
body to the track and on the configuration of the running gear (independent axles, powered bogies, trailer bogies, etc).

It is therefore necessary to consider the various positions which the vehicle may take up on the track so as to take into
account any displacement factor A to be applied to certain terms in the fundamental formulae used for calculating the Ei
internal and Ea external reductions.

The displacement factor and the vehicle running position on the track are given in the table below. For the cases of axle
configuration not represented in the table, the running position conditions to be taken into account must be the least
favourable.

For articulated vehicles, it is recommended to take the running position for conventional 2-bogie vehicles.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/153

Table 2 Displacement factor and vehicle position on the track

L 344/154

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/155

Fig. C13

C.2.4.2.2.

S p e c i a l c a s e s o f m u l t i p l e u n i t s a n d c o a c h e s f i t t e d w i t h a r e v e r s i n g c a b ( d r i v i n g
t r a i l e r )

For this rolling stock, the bogies are classified according to their adhesion coefficient μ on starting.

If μ ≥ 0,2

the bogie is designated

‘motor’

If 0 < μ < 0,2

the bogie is considered

‘trailer’

If μ = 0

the bogie is

‘trailer’.

C.2.4.2.3. Q u a s i - s t a t i c m o v e m e n t

( z )

These movements are taken into account when calculating Ei or Ea, depending on the flexibility coefficient s, the height h
above the running surface of the point under consideration and the height of the roll centre hc.

The Way and Works Department shall define the lineside clearance gauge for h > 0,5 m, when the effective cant excess or
deficiency of the track is greater than 0,05 m calculating in conventional manner the extra quasi-static inclination for rolling
stock with a coefficient of flexibility of 0,4 and a roll centre height of 0,5 m.

The Rolling Stock Department shall determine Ei and Ea taking into account:

— a cant excess or deficiency of 0,05 m;

— where appropriate a cant excess or deficiency of 0,2 m, when the respective values of s and hc lead to the gauge

defined by the Way and Works Department being exceeded (see figure below and paragraph 1.5.1.3).

— of the influence, beyond 1o, of the asymmetry resulting from design and adjustment (1) tolerances (side-bearers play)
and from any unevenness in the distribution of the normal load. The influence of asymmetry less than 1o is taken into
account in the lineside clearance gauge, as are the lateral oscillations created randomly by causes inherent both to the
rolling stock and track (for resonance phenomena in particular).

L 344/156

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Straight line

Equation

z ¼ 0,4:0,05

z ¼ s:0,05

(cid:12)
(cid:12)
(cid:12)
(cid:12)

z ¼ 0,4:0,2

z ¼ s:0,2

(cid:12)
(cid:12)
(cid:12)
(cid:12)

(cid:12)
(cid:12)
(cid:12)
(cid:12)

(cid:12)
(cid:12)
h − 0,5
(cid:12)
(cid:12)
1,5
(cid:12)
(cid:12)
(cid:12)
(cid:12)

(cid:12)
(cid:12)
(cid:12)
(cid:12)

h − hc
1,5
(cid:12)
(cid:12)
h − 0,5
(cid:12)
(cid:12)
1,5
(cid:12)
(cid:12)
(cid:12)
(cid:12) ¼

h − hc
1,5

4s
30

j

h − hc

j

CoN

CN'1

CoP

CQ

CQ"}

From the equations opposite, infer the
lengths of the segments below, the
values of which also appear in the
‘special cases’ in Para. 8.1.3:
Cant excess or deficiency = 0,05 m
h − hc
1,5

1 ¼ s:0,05

h − hc
j

s
30

M0N0

¼

j

Cant excess or deficiency = 0,2 m

(cid:18)

(cid:19)

S
30

þ

S
10

j

h − hc

j

MQ or M00Q00 ¼

¼

4s
30

j
h − hc

j

ð
NP ¼ 0,4 0,2 − 0,05

Þ

Þ
¼ 0,04 h − 0,5
ð

h − 0,5
1,5

(in the above formulae, dimensions are given in metres)

C.2.5.

Determination of reductions by calculation

Reductions Ei and Ea are determined on the basis of the following fundamental relation:

Reduction Ei or Ea = Movement Di or Da — Projection So

Internal reductions

Ei ¼

ani − n2

i þ
2R

p2
4

Að Þ

þ

1,465 − d
2

and external reductions

ðAÞ þ q þ wðAÞ þ z þ xi − So

Ea ¼

ana þ n2

a −
2R

p2
4

ðAÞ

þ

1,465 − d
2

In these formulae:

ðAÞ þ qðAÞ þ wðAÞ þ z þ xa − So

— A, displacement factor, describes the position of the axles on the track. Values for A are given in paragraph (see section

C.2.4.2.1).

— Di or Da is the sum of the movements defined in the following paragraph.

— So is the maximum projection.

xi and xa are special terms for the calculation for vehicles with very large wheelbase.

C.2.5.1.

Terms taken into account in calculating movements (D)

In view of the particular features of each type of vehicle, additional terms are necessary and some parameters may alter the
following terms:

C.2.5.1.1.

Te r m s c o n c e r n i n g t h e r u n n i n g p o s i t i o n o f
o v e r t h r o w )

t h e v e h i c l e o n a c u r v e ( g e o m e t r i c

(cid:18)

(cid:19)

ani − n2

1
2R
body sections located on inside of bogie pivots or of axles).

i þ

p2
4

¼ Geometric overthrow of a given section towards the inside of a curve of radius R (problem of vehicle

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/157

(cid:18)

(cid:19)

ana þ n2

1
2R
vehicle body sections located on outside of bogie pivots or of axles)

a −

p2
4

¼ Geometric overthrow of a given section towards the outside of a curve of radius R (problem of

Note: for special vehicles with particular bogie configurations, these formulae may need to be adapted.

C.2.5.1.2. G r o u p o f

t e r m s c o n c e r n i n g l a t e r a l p l a y

The value of all these plays is measured at right angles to the axles or pivots, with all parts at wear limit.

The vehicle running positions on the track, as shown in paragraph 7.2.2, enable the play to be taken into account in the
formulae and the value of the displacement coefficient applicable to be determined, in order to calculate their effect on the
section considered.

1,465 − d
2

= play of the axle in the track

q

w

= play between axles and underframe and/or between axle and vehicle body. In other words, the lateral movement
between axle-boxes and journals, plus that between the underframe and axle-boxes from the central position and
on each side.
= play of bogie pivots or bolsters. This is the possible lateral movement of the bogie pivots or bolsters, from the
central position and on each side, or, for vehicles without a pivot, the possible lateral movement of the vehicle body
in relation to the bogie frame, from the central position and depending on the curve radius and the direction of
movement.

If the value of w varies with the curve radius:

— wi(R) means that w is considered for radius R and the inside of the curve;

— wa(R) means that w is considered for radius R and the outside of the curve;

— w∞ means that w is considered for straight track.

According to the specific features of each type of vehicle, this term may be rotated: w', wi, w'i, etc. It can also be equal to the
sum of some of these notations: wi + wa, etc, each of these terms being potentially influenced by the corresponding
displacement factor.

C.2.5.1.3. Q u a s i - s t a t i c m o v e m e n t s ( t e r m c o n c e r n i n g v e h i c l e [ ' s ] i n c l i n a t i o n [ l e a n i n g ] o n i t s

s u s p e n s i o n a n d i t s a s y m m e t r y w h e n t h i s i s g r e a t e r t h a n 1 o)

Paragraph C.2.4.2.3. ‘Quasi-static movements’ gives a chart showing the different parts making up the term z

z = deviation from the track central position. This deviation is equal to the sum of 2 terms :

—

j

h − hc

s
30
suspension, under the influence of cant excess or deficiency of 0,05 m);

j: term concerning the inclination due to the suspension (lateral movement due to the flexibility of the

(cid:2)

tan η0 − 1o

(cid:3)

j

h − hc

j: term concerning the asymmetry, (lateral movement due to that part of the asymmetry exceeding 1)

This sum may be increased by:

h

h − hc

s
(cid:138)>0
j
10
defined in paragraph 1.4.2.3.

½
j − 0,04 h − 0,5

i

: term integrating cant excess or deficiency of 0,2 m and applicable under the conditions

>0

For sprung parts located at height h, the above terms give, in the formulae, a value of:

z ¼

h

s
30

(cid:2)
þ tan η0 − 1o

(cid:3)

>0

i

h − hc
j

j þ

h

s
10

j
h − hc

½
j − 0,04 h − 0,5

(cid:138)>0

i

>0

a)

Special cases

— when

(cid:26)

h > hc and 0,5m
s (cid:20) 0,4
η0 (cid:20) 1o

(cid:27)

z ¼

s
30

ð

h − hc

Þ

L 344/158

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

— when

(cid:26)

— when h = hc

For unsprung parts z = 0.

h < 0,5 m
η0 (cid:20) 1o
and for any value of hc and s

(cid:27)

z ¼

4s
30

j

hc − h

j

z = 0

b)

Influence of side-bearers play for wagons fitted with bogies

— For wagons fitted with bogies whose side-bearers play is less than or equal to 5 mm, the 1o angle of asymmetry is

considered to cover this play and the formula η0 = 1o is conventionally used.

The term ‘z’ taking into account side-bearers play less than or equal to 5 mm is given as:

z ¼

h

i

j

h − hc

j þ

h

s
10

j

h − hc

½
j − 0,04 h − 0,5

(cid:138)>0

i

>0

s
30

and account must be taken of the special cases described above.

— For wagons fitted with bogies whose side-bearers play is greater than 5 mm, account should be taken of the additional

inclination α of the vehicle body, expressed as follows:

α ¼ arctan

J − 0,005
bG

This additional inclination α leads to compression of the suspension which, when multiplied by the coefficient of
flexibility s, is given as a rotation of the vehicle body: αs (where s is the coefficient of flexibility).

The total additional inclination may be expressed as:

α (1 + s)

The term z taking account of side-bearers play greater than 5 mm becomes:

(cid:26)

s
30

z ¼

(cid:20)

þ tan η0

(cid:18)
0 þ arctan

ð

J − 0,005
bG

(cid:19)

Þ > 0

(cid:21)

(cid:27)

ð

1 þ s

Þ − 1o

j

h − hc

j þ

>0

h

s
10

j

h − hc

½
j − 0,04 h − 0,5

(cid:138)>0

i

>0

Note: jj>0 means that the expression between the square brackets should be taken as its own value if that value is
positive or as 0 if that value is negative or null.

η’0 = asymmetry in the case of 5 mm side-bearers play.

c)

Special terms xi and xa

Terms representing the correction to be made to certain formulae used to calculate the reductions Ei and Ea for the parts
distant from the pivots of vehicles with a very large wheelbase and/or very large overhang in order to limit space
requirement in curves of radius between 250 m and 150 m:

It will be noted that:

— xi only enters the formulae if

a2 þ p2
4

> 100, i.e. an approximate value for a of 20 m;

— xa only applies if ana þ n2

a −

p2
4

> 120 (exceptional case)

Special condition for xa:

The term xa is not used in the calculation of reductions applicable to vehicles whose overhang respects the conditions laid
down for the automatic coupler.

C.3.

GAUGE G1

In 1991 the decision was taken that the regulations for static gauge should no longer be used for the construction of
wagons.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/159

The static gauge regulations therefore remain applicable only to the gauges specially defined for loads, which was the case for
example with gauges GA, GB, GB1,GB2 and GC.

Static gauge regulations mentioned below include:

1.

2.

a reference profile (upper sections),

reduction formulae linked with this profile.

C.3.1.

Reference profile for static gauge G1

Fig. C14

C.3.1.1.

Reduction formulae

Sections between the end axles or the bogie pivots

(cid:20)

Δi
500

þ

1,465 − d
2

Ei ¼

(cid:21)
þ q þ w þ xi>0 − 0,075

> 0

(cid:18)

with: Δi ¼ 7,5 if

an − n2 þ

(cid:19)

(cid:20) 7,5

p2
4

(cid:18)

Δi ¼ an − n2 þ

(cid:19)

p2
4

if this quantity > 7,5

(cid:18)

1
750

xi ¼

an − n2 þ

(cid:19)

p2
4

− 100

L 344/160

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Sections situated beyond the end axles or the bogie pivots

(cid:18)

(cid:20)

Da
500

þ

1,465 − d
2

Ea ¼

þ q þ w

(cid:19)

2n þ a
a

þ xa½

(cid:21)
(cid:138)>0 − 0,075

> 0

(cid:18)

with Δa ¼ 7,5 if

an þ n2 −

(cid:19)

p2
4

(cid:20) 7,5

(cid:18)

Δa ¼ an þ n2 −

(cid:19)

p2
4

if this quantity is > 7,5

(cid:18)

1
750

xa ¼

an þ n2 −

(cid:19)

p2
4

− 120

C.3.2.

Reference profile for kinematic gauge G1

C.3.2.1.

Part common to all vehicles

Fig. C15

The G1 kinematic reference profile takes into account the most restrictive lineside structure positions and track centre
distances in Continental Europe.

It is divided into 2 parts as follows, one being above and the other below the 400 mm height that is also the limit for the
calculation of projections:

— an upper part defined as being above a plane located 400 mm above the running surface, common to all vehicles,

— a lower part defined as being located at or below the plane located 400 mm above the running surface and which
differs according to whether the vehicles must pass over shunting bumps, rail brakes and other activated shunting and
stopping devices (part lower than 130 mm) or not.

The part below 130 mm differs according to vehicle type.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/161

Loaded coaches must respect the provisions of paragraph C.3.2.2 when on a track without vertical curvature.

Vans and wagons, whether empty or loaded, except for well-wagons and certain combined transport wagons, must satisfy
paragraph C.3.2.3.

In the case of wagons intended to run in transit on the Finnish network, the elements of the lower parts must respect the
gauge in accordance with the specific standards.

Wagons which must not pass over shunting humps with a curvature radius of 250 m or track brakes and other shunting
and stopping devices:

— shall not be allowed to carry the RIV sign, unless otherwise expressly specified in the standards

— are required to bear the inscription to that effect.

C.3.2.2.

Part below 130 mm on vehicles which must not pass over shunting humps or negotiate rail brakes and other activated
shunting and stopping devices

Certain gauge restrictions must be observed at right angles to the axles when vehicles are placed on an under-floor wheel
lathe for wheel reprofiling.

Fig. C16

a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
1)

2)
3)
4)

5)

zone for equipment away from wheels
zone for equipment in immediate proximity of wheels
zone for contact ramp brushes
zone for wheels and other parts coming into contact with the rails
zone occupied exclusively by the wheels
Limit for parts located outside the axle ends (guard irons, sanders, etc.) not to be exceeded for running over
detonators. This limit may however be disregarded for parts located between the wheels, provided these parts
remain within the wheel track.
Maximum theoretical width of the flange profile in the case of check-rails.
Effective limit position of the outside surface of the wheel and of the parts associated with this wheel.
When the vehicle is in any position whatsoever on a curve of radius R = 250 m (minimum radius for contact ramp
installation) and a track width of 1 465 mm, no part of the vehicle likely to descend to less than 100 mm from the
running surface, except for the contact brush, should be less than 125 mm from the track centre.
For parts located inside the bogies, this dimension is 150 mm.
Effective limit position of the internal surface of the wheel when the axle is against the opposite rail. This dimension
varies with gauge widening.

L 344/162

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

C.3.2.3.

Part below 130 mm for vehicles able to pass over shunting humps and negotiate rail brakes and other activated shunting
and stopping devices

Fig. C17

a)

b)

c)

d)

e)

f)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

zone for equipment away from wheels

zone for equipment in immediate proximity of wheels

zone for ejection of standardised drag shoes

zone for wheels and other equipment coming into contact with the rails

zone occupied exclusively by the wheels

zone for rail brakes in released position

Limit for parts located outside the axle ends (guard-irons, sanders, etc) not to be exceeded for running over
detonators.

Maximum fictional width of the flange profiles in the case of check rails.

Effective limit position of the wheel external surface and of the parts associated with the wheel.

This dimension also shows the maximum height of standard drag shoes used for scotching or slowing down the
rolling stock.

No rolling stock equipment should penetrate into this area.

Effective limit position of the wheel internal surface when the axle is against the opposite rail. This dimension varies
with gauge widening.

(7)

See paragraph on ‘Use of shunting devices on curved track section’.

C.3.2.3.1. U s e o f s h u n t i n g d e v i c e s o n c u r v e d t r a c k s e c t i o n s

Rail brakes and other shunting and stopping devices which, when activated, can reach the dimensions 115 or 125 mm, in
particular drag shoes 125 mm high, may be placed on curves of radius R ≥ 150 m.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/163

Fig. C18

It follows that the application limit for the 115 or 125 mm dimensions, which is at a constant distance from the inner edge
of the rail (80 mm), is at a variable distance D from the centreline of the vehicle, as shown in figure 17 above.

Take the following: (1) (values given in metres)

Di ¼ 0,008 þ 1,465 −

1,410
2

þ

an − n2 þ

300

p2
4

¼ 0,840 þ

p2
4

an − n2 þ

300

Da ¼ 0,008 þ 1,465 −

1,410
2

þ

an − n2 −

300

p2
4

¼ 0,840 þ

p2
4

an þ n2 −

300

NOTE: (1) In the particular case involving the use of shunting devices, the influence of plays q + w may be considered
negligible.

C.3.3.

Permitted projections So (S)

The S effective projections must not exceed the So values in the table below.

So projection values (1)

Vehicle types

Track

Ei calculation (3)

Ea calculation (3)

Sections between the end axles of vehicles
not fitted with bogies or between the
pivots of bogie vehicles

Sections beyond the end axles of vehicles
not fitted with bogies or beyond the pivots
of bogie vehicle

h ≤ 0,400

h > 0,400

h ≤ 0,400

h > 0,400

All powered or
trailing vehicles

Powered vehicles
Trailing axle
vehicles
Bogie taken
individually and
their associated
parts

straight

0,015

0,015

0,015

0,015

on 250 curve

0,025

0,030

0,025

0,030

on 150 curve

100 ð2Þ
750

0,025 þ
¼ 0,1583

100 ð2Þ
750

0,030 þ
¼ 0,1633

120 ð2Þ
750

0,025 þ
¼ 0,185

120 ð2Þ
750

0,030 þ
¼ 0,190

L 344/164

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Vehicle types

Track

Ei calculation (3)

Ea calculation (3)

Sections between the end axles of vehicles
not fitted with bogies or between the
pivots of bogie vehicles

Sections beyond the end axles of vehicles
not fitted with bogies or beyond the pivots
of bogie vehicle

h ≤ 0,400

h > 0,400

h ≤ 0,400

h > 0,400

on 250 curve

0,010

0,015

0,025

0,030

Trailing bogie
stock or
equivalent

on 150 curve

100 ð2Þ
750

0,010 þ
¼ 0,1433

100 ð2Þ
750

0,015 þ
¼ 0,1483

120 ð2Þ
750

0,025 þ
¼ 0,185

120 ð2Þ
750

0,030 þ
¼ 0,190

(1) These values have been calculated with the l track gauge which leads to the most restrictive E reduction. This value is L = lmax. =1,465
m in all cases except for the Ei international reduction for trailing bogie stock or equivalent vehicles for which it is necessary to take
lmin = 1,435 m. Furthermore, for powered units and railcars with one designated ‘motor’ bogie and one trailer bogie or bogie
considered as a ‘trailer’ (see paragraph 7.2.2.1), the width of the track considered in the internal reduction Ei formulae is 1,435 m for
the trailer bogie and 1,465 m for the motor bogie. However, for the sake of simplicity in calculating reductions graphically the
following values may be taken for both bogies: l = 1,435 m on straight track and 1,465 m on a 250 m curve. In this latter case, the
width of the vehicle body is penalised at right angles to the trailer bogie.

(2) Term xi or xain the reduction formulae.
(3) These values do not apply to the reference profile for parts on the roof.

C.3.4.

Reduction formulae

Remark: The formulae below must be used to calculate the gauging of articulated vehicles whose wheelset or bogie pivot
centrelines coincide with the articulation centrelines of the their bodies. For other articulated vehicle architectures the
formulae must be adapted to the actual geometrical conditions.

C.3.4.1.

Reduction formulae applicable to powered vehicles (dimensions in metres)

Powered vehicles for which play w is independent of the track position or varies linearly with the curvature

Internal reductions Ei (where n = ni)

Sections between the end axles of powered vehicles not fitted with bogies or between the pivots of powered bogie vehicles.

When an − n2 þ

p2
4

(cid:0)

− 500 W∞ − Wið250Þ

(cid:1)

(cid:20) j5 ð1Þ
7,5 ð2Þ

position on straight track preponderant:

Ei ¼

1,465 − d
2

þ q þ w∞ þ z − 0,015

when an − n2 þ

p2
4

(cid:0)

− 500 W∞ − Wið250Þ

(cid:1)

> j5 ð1Þ
7,5 ð2Þ

position on curve preponderant:

Ei ¼

an − n2 þ

500

p2
4

þ

1,465 − d
2

þ q þ wið250Þ þ z þ ½xi(cid:138)>0 − j0,025 ð1Þ
0,030 ð2Þ

with xi ¼

1
750

(cid:18)

an − n2 þ

p2
4

(cid:19)

− 100

þ wið150Þ − wið250Þ

External reductions Ea (where n = na)

(101)

(102)

(103)

Sections beyond the end axles of powered vehicles not fitted with bogies or the pivots or powered bogie vehicles.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/165

when an þ n2 −

p2
4

h

(cid:0)

− 500 w∞ − wið250Þ

(cid:0)

þ w∞ − wað250Þ

(cid:1)n
a

i
(cid:1)n þ a
a

(cid:20) j5 ð1Þ
7,5 ð2Þ

position on straight track preponderant:

(cid:18)

1,465 − d
2

Ea ¼

þ q þ w∞

(cid:19)

2n þ a
a

þ z − 0,015

when an þ n2 −

p2
4

h

(cid:0)

− 500 w∞ − wið250Þ

(cid:0)

þ w∞ − wað250Þ

(cid:1)n
a

i
(cid:1)n þ a
a

> j5 ð1Þ
7,5 ð2Þ

position on curve preponderant:

p2
4

þ

an þ n2 −

Ea ¼
j0,025ð1Þ
0,030ð2Þ

500

(cid:18)

1,465 − d
a

(cid:19)

þ q

2n þ a
a

þ wið250Þ

n
a

þ wað250Þ

n þ a
a

þ z þ ½xa(cid:138)>0 −

(cid:18)

1
750

an − n2 −

(cid:19)

p2
4

− 120

(cid:0)

þ wið150Þ − wið250Þ

(cid:1)n
a

(cid:0)

þ wað150Þ − wað250Þ

(cid:1)n þ a
a

with xa ¼

NOTES

(106)

(107)

(108)

(1)

(2)

This value applies to those parts no more than 0,400 m above the running surface and those which may descend
below this level as a result of wear and vertical movements.
This value applies to parts located more than 0,400 m above the running surface, with the exception of those covered
by footnote (1) above

Powered units for which travel w varies non-linearly depending on the curvature (exceptional case)

— Other than curves of radius R 150 and 250 m for which formulae (104), (105) and (109), (110) are identical to
formulae (101), (102) and (106), (107) respectively, formulae (104), (105), (109) and (110) must be applied for the

value of R for which the variation of w as a function of

which the variable stops come into play.

1
R

shows a discontinuity; in other words the value of R as from

— For each section of the powered unit, the reduction to be taken is the greatest of those obtained from the application
of the formulae, in which the value of R to be used is that which gives the highest value for the part between square
brackets.

Internal reduction Ei (where n = ni)

when ∞ > R ≥ 250

an − n2 þ

Ei ¼

3

− j5ð1Þ
7,5ð2Þ

þ wiðRÞ

7
7
5 þ

1,465 − d
2

þ q þ z − 0,015

(104)

p2
4
2R

2

6
6
4

2

6
6
4

when 250 > R ≥ 150

an − n2 þ

Ei ¼

3

− 100

þ wiðRÞ

7
7
5 þ

1,465 − d
2

þ q þ z þ j0,175 ð1Þ
0,170 ð2Þ

(105)

(3)

p2
4
2R

External reduction Ea (where n = na)

when ∞ > R ≥ 250

2

6
6
4

Ea ¼

an þ n2 −

p2
4
2R

3

− j5ð1Þ
7,5ð2Þ

þ wiðRÞ

n
a

þ waðRÞ

n þ a
a

7
7
5 þ

(cid:18)

1,465 − d
2

(cid:19)

þ q

2n þ a
a

þ z − 0,015

(109)

L 344/166

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

when 250> R ≥ 150

3

− 120

þ wiðRÞ

n
a

þ waðRÞ

n þ a
a

7
7
5 þ

(cid:18)

1,465 − d
2

(cid:19)

þ q

2n þ a
a

þ z þ j0,215ð1Þ
0,210ð2Þ

(110) (3)

2

6
6
4

Ea ¼

an þ n2 −

p2
4
2R

NOTES

(1)

(2)

(3)

This value applies to those parts no more than 0,400 m above the running surface and those which may descend
below this level as a result of wear and vertical movements assessed.
This value applies to parts located more than 0,400 m above the running surface, with the exception of those covered
by footnote (1) above.
In practice, formulae (105) and (110) are without effect, since variation of travel w takes effect when R > 250 through
the effect of variable stops.

C.3.4.2.

Reduction formulae applicable to multiple units (dimensions in metres)

For multiple units with one motor bogie and one trailer bogie (see table below)

Multiple units fitted with :

Values of μ for each of the bogies

Running positions
§ 2.4.2.2

Reduction formulae

cases 2 and 5
cases 2 and 7

§ 3.4.1
§ 3.4.3

cases 3 and 6

§ 3.4.2 (3)
or
§ 3.4.1 (3)

μ ≥ 0,2
0 < μ < 0,2

0 < μ < 0,2

μ = 0

μ ≥ 0,2
μ = 0
0 < μ < 0,2

nμ
a

þ z − 0,015

2 motor bogies
2 bogies considered as ‘trailer’
bogies

one bogie considered as ‘trailer’
bogie
and one trailer bogie

one motor bogie and
one trailer bogie
or considered as ‘trailer’ bogie

Internal reductions Ei (4)

Sections between bogie pivots

Ei ¼

1,465 − d
2
anμ − n2

μ þ

þ w0

∞

a − nμ
a
p2
4

þ

:

nμ
a

þ q þ w∞
p2
a − nμ
:
a
4
500

Ei ¼
½xi(cid:138)>0 − j0,010ð1Þ
0,015ð2Þ − 0,015
"
1
anμ − n2
750
(cid:1)nμ
a

with xi ¼
(cid:0)
w0

ið150Þ − w0

ið250Þ

a − nμ
a
p2
4

μ −

þ

1,465 − d
2

:

a − nμ
a

þ q þ wið250Þ

a − nμ
a

þ w0

ið250Þ

nμ
a

þ z þ

#

a − nμ
a

þ

p02
4

:

nμ
a

− 100

(cid:0)

þ wið150Þ − wið250Þ

(cid:1)a − nμ
a

þ

:

(101a)

(102a)

(103a)

NOTES

(3)

(4)

The results of the formulae in paragraphs 3.4.1 and 3.4.2 are very similar; as a result, the formulae in paragraph 2.4.1
are generally employed, those of paragraph 3.4.2 being reserved for cases where the increased reduction obtained on
the half-width of the maximum construction gauge is particularly significant (0 to 12,5 mm according to the vehicle
section considered).
The reduction to apply for a given value of n is the greatest reduction obtained from the following formulae:
— (101 a) or (102 a) and (103 a);
— (106 a) or (107 a) and (108 a);
— (106 b) or (107 b) and (108 b).

External reductions Ea (4) motor bogie end (at the front in the running direction)

Sections beyond the bogie pivots (where n = na)

(cid:20)

1,465 − d
2

(cid:21)

þ q

Ea ¼

2n þ a
a

þ w∞

n þ a
a

þ w0

∞

n
a

þ z − 0,015

(106a)

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/167

þ

p02
4

:

n
a

:

p2
n þ a
a
4
500

an þ n2 −

Ea ¼
½xa(cid:138)>0 − j0,025 ð1Þ
0,030 ð2Þ

þ

1,465 − d
2

:

n þ a
a

þ q

2n þ a
a

þ w0

ið250Þ

n
a

þ wað250Þ

n þ a
a

þ z þ

(107a)

"

with xa ¼

1
750

an þ n2 −

(cid:0)
wað250Þ − wað250Þ

(cid:1)n þ a
a

p2
4

:

n þ a
a

þ

p02
4

:

n
a

#

− 120

(cid:0)
þ w0

ið150Þ − w0

ið250Þ

(cid:1)n
a

þ

External reductions Ea (4) trailer bogie end (at the front in the running direction)

Sections beyond the bogie pivots (where n = na)

(cid:20)

1,465 − d
2

(cid:21)

þ q

Ea ¼

2n þ a
a

þ w∞

n
a

þ w0

∞

n þ a
a

þ z − 0,015

p02
4

n þ a
:
a

−

(cid:18)

þ

p2
n
:
a
4
500

1,465 − d
2

an þ n2 þ

Ea ¼
½xa(cid:138)>0 − j0,025 ð1Þ
0,030 ð2Þ

(cid:19)

þ q

2n þ a
a

þ wið250Þ

n
a

þ w0

að250Þ

n þ a
a

þ z þ

p2
4

:

n
a

−

p02
4

:

n þ a
a

#

− 120

(cid:0)

þ wið150Þ − wið250Þ

(cid:1)n
a

þ

"

with xa ¼

1
750

an þ n2 þ

(cid:0)
w0

að250Þ − w0

að250Þ

(cid:1)n þ a
a

NOTES

(108a)

(106b)

(107b)

(108b)

(4)

(1)

(2)

The reduction to apply for a given value of n is the greatest reduction obtained from the following formulae:
— (101 a) or (102 a) and (103 a);
— (106 a) or (107 a) and (108 a);
— (106 b) or (107 b) and (108 b).
This value applies to those parts no more than 0,400 m above the running surface and those which may descend
below this level as a result of wear and vertical movements.
This value applies to parts located more than 0,400 m above the running surface, with the exception of those covered
by footnote (1) above.

C.3.4.3.

Reduction formulae applicable to coaches and passenger vehicles (dimensions in metres)

a)

For bogie coaches, with the exception of the bogies themselves and their associated parts

Coaches for which the play w is independent of the track position radius or varies linearly with the track curvature

Note: The formulae below must also be used to calculate the gauging of axle coaches.

Internal reductions Ei

Sections between bogie pivots (where n = ni)

When an − n2 þ

(cid:0)

− 500 w∞ − wið250Þ

(cid:1)

p2
4

(cid:20) 250 1,465 − d

ð

Þ − j2,5 ð1Þ
0 ð2Þ

the position on straight track is preponderant:

Ei ¼

1,465 − d
2

þ q þ w∞ þ z − 0,015

(201)

When an − n2 þ

(cid:0)

− 500 w∞ − wið250Þ

(cid:1)

p2
4

> 250 1,465 − d

ð

Þ − j2,5ð1Þ
0ð2Þ

L 344/168

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

the position on curved track is preponderant:

Ei ¼

an − n2 þ

500

p2
4

þ q þ wið250Þ þ z þ ½xi(cid:138)>0 − j0,010ð1Þ

0,015ð2Þ

with xi ¼

1
750

(cid:18)

an − n2 þ

p2
4

(cid:19)

− 100

þ wið150Þ − wið250Þ

NOTES

(202)

(203)

(1)

(2)

This value applies to those parts no more than 0,400 m above the running surface and those which may descend
below this level as a result of wear and vertical movements.
This value applies to parts located more than 0,400 m above the running surface, with the exception of those covered
by footnote (1) above.

External reductions Ea

Sections beyond bogie pivots (where n = na)

When an þ n2 −

p2
4

h
(cid:0)

− 500 w∞ − wið250Þ

(cid:0)

þ w∞ − wað250Þ

(cid:1)n
a

i

(cid:1)n þ a
a

(cid:20) 250 1,465 − d

ð

Þ

n
a

þ j5 ð1Þ
7,5 ð2Þ

the position on straight track is preponderant:

(cid:18)

1,465 − d
2

Ea ¼

þ q þ w∞

(cid:19)

2n þ a
a

þ z − 0,015

When an þ n2 −

p2
4

h
(cid:0)

− 500 w∞ − wið250Þ

(cid:0)

þ w∞ − wað250Þ

(cid:1)n
a

i

(cid:1)n þ a
a

> 250 1,465 − d

ð

Þ

n
a

þ j5ð1Þ
7,5ð2Þ

the position on curved track is preponderant:

p2
4

an þ n2 −

500

Ea ¼

with:

þ

1,465 − d
2

n þ a
:
a

þ q

2n þ a
a

þ wið250Þ

n
a

þ wað250Þ

n þ a
a

þ z þ ½xa(cid:138)>0 − j0,025ð1Þ

0,030ð2Þ

(cid:18)

1
750

xa ¼

an þ n2 −

(cid:19)

p2
4

− 120

(cid:0)

þ wið150Þ − wið250Þ

(cid:1)n
a

(cid:0)

þ wað150Þ − wað250Þ

(cid:1)n þ a
a

NOTES

(1)

(2)

This value applies to those parts no more than 0,400 m above the running surface and those which may descend
below this level as a result of wear and vertical movements.
This value applies to parts located more than 0,400 m above the running surface, with the exception of those covered
by footnote (1) above.

Coaches for which the play w varies non-linearly with the curvature

On straight track the reductions are calculated using formulae 201 and 206.

On curves, the reductions are calculated for R = 150 m and R = 250 m using formulae (204), (205), (209) and (210).

It should be noted that for a radius of R = 250 m, formulae (204) and (209) are identical, respectively, to formulae (202) and
(207).

Furthermore, formulae (204), (205) and (209), (210) must be applied for values of R for which the variation of w, as a

function of

1
R

, presents a discontinuity (a step change), i.e. the value of R from which the variable stops come into play.

For each section of the coach, the reduction to be taken is the greatest of those resulting from the application of the above-
mentioned formulae, in which the value of R to be used is that which gives the highest value for the part between square
brackets.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/169

Internal reductions Ei (where n = ni)

When ∞ > R ≥ 250

2

6
6
4

2

6
6
4

an − n2 þ

Ei ¼

3

− j5ð1Þ
7,5ð2Þ

þ wiðRÞ

7
7
5 þ q þ z

p2
4
2R

When 250 > R ≥ 150

an − n2 þ

Ei ¼

3

− 100

þ wiðRÞ

7
5 þ q þ z þ j0,190 ð1Þ
7

0,185 ð2Þ

p2
4
2R

External reductions Ea (where n = na)

When ∞ > R ≥ 250

2

6
6
4

Ea ¼

an þ n2 −

p2
4
2R

− j5ð1Þ
7,5ð2Þ

3

þ wiðRÞ

n
a

þ waðRÞ

n þ a
a

7
7
5 þ

1,465 − d
2

:

n þ a
a

þ q

2n þ a
a

þ z − 0,015

When 250 > R ≥ 150

2

6
6
4

Ea ¼

an þ n2 −

p2
4
2R

3

− 120

þ wiðRÞ

n
a

þ waðRÞ

n þ a
a

7
7
5 þ

1,465 − d
2

:

n þ a
a

þ q

2n þ a
a

þ z þ j0,215 ð1Þ
0,210 ð2Þ

NOTES

(204)

(205) (3)

(209)

(210) (3)

(1)

(2)

(3)

This value applies to those parts no more than 0,400 m above the running surface and those which may descend
below this level as a result of wear and vertical movements.
This value applies to parts located more than 0,400 m above the running surface, with the exception of those covered
by footnote (1) above.
In practice, formulae (205) and (210) have no effect, since the variation in play w, resulting from the variable stops
taking effect, begins only when R>250.

b)

For bogies and their associated parts

The reduction formulae to be applied are those given in § 4.2.1.8.2. Nonetheless, the distance between the end axles of the
bogies is in most cases such that formulae (201) and (206) opposite, identical to formulae (101) and (106), are applicable.

C.3.4.4.

Reduction formulae applicable to wagons (dimensions in metres)

a)

For wagons with independent axles and the bogies themselves and their associated parts (w = 0)

For 2-axle wagons, and only for those parts located below 1,17 m above the running surface, term Z in formulae (301) to
(307) may be reduced by 0,005 m when (z-0,005) > 0. It shall be considered nil when (z-0,005) ≤ 0.

1)

Internal reductions Ei — Sections between the end axles (where n = ni)

When an − n2 (cid:20) j5ð1Þ

7,5ð2Þ the position on straight track is preponderant:

Ei ¼

1,465 − d
2

þ q þ w∞ þ z − 0,015

When an − n2 > j5 ð1Þ
7,5 ð2Þ

the position on curved track is preponderant:

Ei ¼

an − n2
500

þ

1,465 − d
2

þ q þ z − j0,025 ð1Þ
0,030 ð2Þ

(301)

(302)

L 344/170

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

2)

External reductions Ea — Sections beyond the end axles (where n = na)

When an þ n2 (cid:20) j5 ð1Þ
7,5 ð2Þ

the position on straight track is preponderant:

(cid:18)

1,465 − d
2

(cid:19)

2n þ a
a

Ea ¼

þ z − 0,015

When an þ n2 > j5 ð1Þ
7,5 ð2Þ

the position on curved track is preponderant:

Ea ¼

an þ n2
500

þ

(cid:18)

1,465 − d
2

NOTES

(cid:19)

þ q

2n þ a
a

þ z − j0,025 ð1Þ
0,030 ð2Þ

(306)

(307)

(1)

(2)

This value applies to those parts no more than 0,400 m above the running surface and those which may descend
below this level as a result of wear and vertical movements.
This value applies to parts located more than 0,400 m above the running surface, with the exception of those covered
by footnote (1) above.

b)

For bogie wagons

For bogie wagons whose play is considered to be constant, except for the bogies themselves and their associated parts.

Special remark for calculation of z: see § 1.5.1.3.

1)

- Internal reductions Ei — Sections between bogie pivots (where n = ni)

When an − n2 þ

p2
4

(cid:20) 250 1,465 − d

ð

Þ − j2,5 ð1Þ
0 ð2Þ

the position on straight track is preponderant:

Ei ¼

1,465 − d
2

þ q þ w∞ þ z − 0,015

(311)

When an − n2 þ

p2
4

> 250 1,465 − d

ð

Þ − j2,5 ð1Þ
0 ð2Þ

the position on curved track is preponderant:

Ei ¼

an − n2 þ

500

p2
4

þ q þ w þ z þ ½xi(cid:138)>0 − j0,010 ð1Þ
0,015 ð2Þ

with xi ¼

1
750

(cid:18)

an − n2 þ

(cid:19)

p2
4

− 100

(312)

(313)

2)

External reductions Ea — Sections beyond bogie pivots (where n = na)

When an þ n2 −

p2
4

(cid:20) 250 1,465 − d

ð

Þ

n
a

þ j5 ð1Þ
7,5 ð2Þ

the position on straight track is preponderant:

(cid:18)

1,465 − d
2

Ea ¼

þ q þ w

(cid:19)

2n þ a
a

þ z − 0,015

(316)

When an þ n2 −

p2
4

> 250 1,465 − d

ð

Þ

n
a

þ j5 ð1Þ
7,5 ð2Þ

the position on curved track is preponderant:

p2
4

an þ n2 −

Ea ¼
þ
500
z þ ½xa(cid:138)>0 þ j0,025 ð1Þ
0,030 ð2Þ

1,465 − d
2

n þ a
:
a

þ q þ w

ð

Þ

2n þ a
a

þ

(317)

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/171

with xi ¼

1
750

(cid:18)

an þ n2 −

(cid:19)

p2
4

− 120

NOTES

(318)

(1)

(2)

This value applies to those parts no more than 0,400 m above the running surface and those which may descend
below this level as a result of wear and vertical movements.
This value applies to parts located more than 0,400 m above the running surface, with the exception of those covered
by footnote (1) above.

C.3.5.

Reference profile for pantographs and non-insulated live parts on the roof

Figure 19

Note: For vehicles worked on electrified lines, the shaded areas may be used for gauging pantograph bows in the down
position.

On non electrified lines, the same possibilities are allowable subject to specific studies by the railways.

C.3.6.

Rules for the reference profile for determining the maximum rolling stock construction gauge

C.3.6.1.

Powered units fitted with pantographs

Pantograph in current collection position

The present standard is based on the characteristics of pantographs for standard gauge powered units.

In order for powered units with pantographs to respect the limit position resulting from the reference profile, the
characteristics of these vehicles (play and coefficient of flexibility of the pantograph-bearing section) and the position of the
pantograph in relation to the axles must be such that the quantities E'i and E'a (with pantographs raised to 6,5 m above the
running surface) and E"i and E"a (pantographs raised to 5 m above the running surface) are negative or nil.

L 344/172

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

This condition is met if the section in which the pantograph bow is operated is placed close to the transverse centreline of
the bogies, i.e. if n is very small or nil.

The limit position is then defined by the reference profile for roof-mounted equipment shown in paragraph 2.5. It

corresponds to a maximum geometric overthrow of the pantograph bow of

2,5
.
R

a)

Preliminary calculations

To determine E'i, E'a, E"i and E"a, the following preliminary calculations are necessary (1) 1):

j'i = q + wi - 0,0375 (2) 2)

j0

a ¼ q

2n þ a
a

þ wa

n þ a
a

þ wi

n
a

− 0,0375 (2)

when s ≤ 0,225 (general case)

z0 ¼

8
30

ð

s − 0,225

Þ þ t − 0,03

ð

Þ þ τ − 0,01

ð

Þ
Þ þ 6 θ − 0,005

ð

but if s > 0,225, this implies a value of

z0 ¼

8
10

ð

s − 0,225

Þ þ t − 0,03

ð

Þ þ τ − 0,01

ð

Þ
Þ þ 6 θ − 0,005

ð

when s ≤ 0,225 (general case)

z00 ¼

6
30

s þ

r

ﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃ
(cid:16)
t h − ht
Þ2
6,5 − ht

þ τ2 þ θ h − hc
ð

(cid:17)2

ð

Þ

but if s > 0,225, this implies a value of

z00 ¼

6
10

s þ

r

ﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃ
(cid:16)
t h − ht
Þ2
6,5 − ht

þ τ2 þ θ h − hc
ð

(cid:17)2

ð

Þ

− 0,0925

− 0,1825

b)

For sections between the end axles or bogie pivots

Expressions for E'i and E"i (where n = ni)

When an − n2 þ

h = 6,5 m
h = 5 m

When an − n2 þ

p2
4

p2
4

h = 6,5 m

h = 5 m

(cid:20) 5 the position on straight track is preponderant:

E'i = j'i + z'
E''i = j'i + z''

> 5 the position on curved track is preponderant:

an − n2 þ

p2
4

− 5

E0

i ¼

00

E
i ¼

300
an − n2 þ

p2
4

300

þ j0

i þ z0

− 5

þ j0

i þ z00

(111)
(115)

(112)

(116)

c)

For sections beyond the end axles or bogie pivots

Expressions for E'a and E"a (where n = na)

(1)
(2)

For powered units without fixed bogie pivots, see note in § 1.1.
If the play varies according to the track position radius, the maximum value of wi at pivot level (actual or theoretical) shall be taken from
j'i, and the maximum value of wa and the corresponding value of wi taken from j'a.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/173

When an − n2 þ

h = 6,5 m

h = 5 m

When an − n2 þ

p2
4

p2
4

h = 6,5 m

h = 5 m

(cid:20) 5 the position on straight track is preponderant:

E0

a ¼ j0

a þ z0 þ

E00

a ¼ j0

a þ z00 þ

1,465 − d
:
2
1,465 − d
:
2

2n
a
2n
a

> 5 the position on curved track is preponderant:

an þ n2 −

p2
4

− 5

300
an þ n2 −

p2
4

− 5

300

E0

a ¼

E00

a ¼

þ j0

a þ z0 þ

1,465 − d
2

:

2n
a

þ j0

a þ z00 þ

1,465 − d
2

:

2n
a

(113)

(117)

(114)

(118)

C.3.6.2.

Railcars fitted with pantographs

The limit position for pantographs on a railcar with one motor bogie and one trailer bogie shall be determined as if both
bogies were identical to the one above which the pantograph is placed.

C.3.6.3.

Pantographs in lowered position

Subject, if necessary, to application of the insulation conditions, the lowered pantograph must fall entirely within the gauge
defined.

C.3.6.4.

Insulation clearance margin for 25kV

On vehicles which may use a 25 kV power supply, all non-insulated parts likely to remain live must be arranged so as to fall
well within the 0,170 m reference profile.

C.4.

GA, GB, GC VEHICLE GAUGES

By comparison with the G1 gauge, the GA, GB and GC gauges are larger in the upper part.

Loads and vehicles conforming to enlarged gauges GA, GB or GC shall only be allowed on lines widened to these gauges.
The lines concerned are listed in the Infrastructure Register . All GA, GB and GC movements on lines not shown on this list
shall be treated as special consignments.

Wagons and coaches built to gauges GA, GB or GC shall be identified by a marking as specified in Annex B 32

C.4.1.

Static gauge reference profiles and associated rules

The reference profiles for the static gauges GA GB and GC (see Fig. 20), together with their associated rules, apply exclusively
to determining the maximum load profiles and on the condition that the coefficient of flexibility of the wagon + its load is
not greater than that of the typical load considered, having the following characteristics:

q+w=0,023m; p = 1,8m; d = 1,41m;

J = 0,005m η0 < 1o hC = 0,5m

s = 0,3

vertical oscillations 0,03m (GA, GB); 0,05m (GC)

In view of tolerances on centring, the half-widths should be at most equal to those of the reference profiles reduced by the
following values Ei and Ea.

L 344/174

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

REFERENCE PROFILES FOR STATIC GAUGES GA, GB and GC (load gauges)

Fig. C20

Note: Up to a height of 3 220 mm, the reference profile of the GA, GB and GC gauges is identical to that of the G1 gauge.

C.4.1.1.

GA and GB static gauges

— Height h ≤ 3,22 m. The Ei and Ea reduction formulae to be applied are those associated with the G1 static gauge.

— Height h > 3,22 m. The Ei and Ea reduction formulae to be applied are as follows:

a)

For the sections between the bogie pivots or between the end axles of vehicles not mounted on bogies

(cid:18)

When

an − n2 þ

(cid:18)

When

an − n2 þ

(cid:19)

(cid:19)

p2
4

p2
4

(cid:20) 7,5 þ 32,5k Δi=7,5 + 32,5k

> 7,5 þ 32,5k Δi ¼ an − n2 þ

p2
4

(cid:20)

Δi
500

þ

1,465 − d
2

Ei ¼

(cid:21)
þ q þ w þ xi>0 − 0,075 − 0,065k

>0

(601)

with xi ¼

1
750

(cid:18)

an − n2 þ

(cid:19)

− 100

;

p2
4

k = (see Table 1)

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/175

b)

For sections beyond the bogie pivots or the end axles of vehicles not mounted on bogies

(cid:18)

When an þ n2 −

(cid:19)

p2
4

(cid:20) 7,5 þ 32,5k Δa ¼ 7,5 þ 32,5k

(cid:18)

When

an þ n2 −

(cid:19)

p2
4

> 7,5 þ 32,5k Δa ¼ an þ n2 −

p2
4

(cid:18)

(cid:20)

Δa
500

þ

1,465 − d
2

Ea ¼

þ q þ w

(cid:19)

2n þ a
a

with xa ¼

(cid:18)

1
750

an þ n2 −

(cid:19)

− 100

;

p2
4

þ xa>0 − 0,075 − 0,065k

(cid:21)

>0

(602)

k = (see Table 1)

TABLE 1:

GA GAUGE

if 3,22<h<3,85 m, k ¼

h − 3,22
0,63

if h ≥ 3,85 m, k = 1

GB GAUGE

if 3,22<h<4,08 m, k ¼

h − 3,22
0,86

if h ≥ 4,08 m, k = 1

C.4.1.2.

GC static gauge

The Ei and Ea reduction formulae to be applied are those associated with the G1 static gauge irrespective of the value of h.

C.4.2.

Kinematic gauge reference profiles and associated rules

The GA, GB and GC kinematic gauge reference profiles (see Fig. 21) taken with their associated rules allow to determine the
maximum construction profile for vehicles in the same way as when using the G1 gauge.

The rules for the kinematic calculations may be applied to clearly defined loads.

The term ‘clearly defined loads’ shall be understood to mean: transferable unit loads of known geometry, e.g. containers and
swap bodies conveyed on carrier wagons fitted with load positioning devices, and semi-trailers with deflated air suspension
or mechanical suspension with a known roll flexibility coefficient and conveyed on recess wagons.

Under these conditions the combination of a wagon and its load can be treated as a normal single wagon.

Reference profiles for GA, GB and GC kinematic gauges

L 344/176

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Fig. C21

Note: Up to a height of 3 220 mm, the reference profile of the GA, GB and GC gauges is identical to that of the G1 gauge.

C.4.2.1.

Tractive units (except railcars and multiple unit motor coaches)

C.4.2.1.1.

G A a n d G B k i n e m a t i c g a u g e s

— Height h ≤ 3,25m. The formulae to be applied are those associated with the G1 profile.

— Height h > 3,25m. The formulae to be applied are those associated with the G1 profile, with the exception of the

formulae given under cases a) and b) below.

a)

Vehicles for which the play w is independent of the track position radius or varies linearly with the track curvature

1)

For sections between the bogie pivots or between the end axles of vehicles not mounted on bogies

When an − n2 þ

(cid:0)

− 500 W∞ − Wið250Þ

p2
4

Ei ¼

1,465 − d
2

þ q þ w∞ þ z − 0,015

When an − n2 þ

(cid:0)

− 500 W∞ − Wið250Þ

p2
4

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:20) 7,5 þ 32,5k

> 7,5 þ 32,5k

Ei ¼

an − n2 þ

500

p2
4

þ

1,465 − d
2

þ q þ wið250Þ þ xi>0 − 0,030 − 0,065k

with xi ¼

1
750

(cid:18)

an − n2 þ

p2
4

(cid:19)

− 100

þ wið150Þ − wið250Þ

k and z= (see table 2)

(603)

(604)

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/177

2)

For sections beyond the bogie pivots or the end axles of vehicles not mounted on bogies

When an þ n2 −

p2
4

h
(cid:0)

− 500 w∞ − wið250Þ

(cid:0)

þ w∞ − wið250Þ

(cid:1)n
a

i
(cid:1)n þ a
a

(cid:20) 7,5 þ 32,5k

(cid:18)

1,465 − d
2

Ea ¼

þ q þ W∞

(cid:19)

2n þ a
a

þ z − 0,015

(605)

When

an þ n2 −

p2
4

h

(cid:0)

− 500 W∞ − Wið250Þ

(cid:0)

þ W∞ − Wið250Þ

(cid:1)n
a

i

(cid:1)n þ a
a

> 7,5 þ 32,5k

(cid:18)

1,465 − d
2

(cid:19)

þ q

2n þ a
a

þ wið250Þ

n
a

þ Wað250Þ

n þ a
a

þ z þ xa>0 −

(606)

p2
4

þ

Ea ¼

an þ n2 −

500

0,030 − 0,065k

with

(cid:18)

1
750

xa ¼

an þ n2 −

p2
4

(cid:19)

− 120 − 20k

ð

Þ

(cid:0)

þ Wið150Þ − Wið250Þ

(cid:1)n
a

(cid:0)

þ Wað150Þ − Wað250Þ

(cid:1)n þ a
a

k and z= (see table 2)

b)

1)

Vehicles for which the play w varies non-linearly with the track curvature

For sections between the bogie pivots or the end axles of vehicles not mounted on bogies

For each point of the vehicle, the value of Ei to be taken is the

greatest obtained from application of:

— formula (603) above

— formulae (607) and (608) below in which the value of R to be taken maximises the portion between the square

brackets

2

an − n2 þ

6
6
4

Ei ¼

p2
4

3

Þ
− 7,5 þ 32,5k

ð

2R

þ wiðRÞ

7
7
5 þ

1,465 − d
2

with ∞ > R ≥ 250 m

þ q þ z − 0,015

(607)

2

6
6
4

Ei ¼

an − n2 þ

3

− 100

þ wiðRÞ

7
7
5 þ

1,465 − d
2

þ q þ z − 0,170 − 0,065k

(608)

p2
4
2R

with 250 > R ≥ 150 m

k and z= (see table 2)

2)

For sections beyond the bogie pivots or the end axles of vehicles not mounted on bogies

For each point on the vehicle, the value of Ea to be taken is the greatest obtained from application of:

— formula (605) above

formulae (609) and (610) below in which the value of R to be taken maximises the portion between the square
brackets

L 344/178

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

2

6
6
4

Ea ¼

an þ n2 −

p2
4

z − 0,015

Þ
− 7,5 þ 32,5k

ð

2R

þ wiðRÞ

n
a

þ WaðRÞ

n þ a
a

7
7
5 þ

(cid:18)

1,465 − d
2

(cid:19)

þ q

2n þ a
a

þ

3

with ∞ > R ≥ 250 m

2

6
6
4

Ea ¼

an þ n2 −

p2
4

− 120 − 20k

ð

Þ

2R

3

þ wiðRÞ

n
a

þ WaðRÞ

n þ a
a

7
7
5 þ

(cid:18)

1,465 − d
2

(cid:19)

þ q

2n þ a
a

þ

(609)

(610)

z − 0,210 − 0,105k

with 250 > R ≥ 150 m

k and z= (see table 2)

TABLE 2:

GA GAUGE

if 3,25<h<3,38, k ¼

h − 3,25
0,63

if h ≥ 3,88 m, k = 1

GB GAUGE

if 3,25<h<4,11, k ¼

h − 3,25
0,86

if h ≥ 4,11 m, k = 1

z ¼

h

s
30

(cid:0)
þ tan η0 − 1°

(cid:1)
>0

i

ð

h − hc

Þ þ

h

s
10

ð

h − hc

C.4.2.1.2. G C k i n e m a t i c g a u g e

Þ − 0,04 − 0,01k

ð

Þ
Þ h − 0,5
ð

i

>0

The formulae to be applied are those associated with the G1 profile, irrespective of the value of h.

C.4.2.2.

Railcars and multiple unit motor coaches

Note: The gauge characteristics of railcars and multiple unit motor coaches whose bogies can be considered to be motor or
trailer bogies are described in § 3.4.2.

C.4.2.2.1. G A a n d G B k i n e m a t i c g a u g e s

— Height h ≤ 3,25m. The formulae to be applied are those associated with the G1 profile.

— Height h > 3,25m. The formulae to be applied are those associated with the G1 profile with the exception of the

following formulae:

— Railcars and MU motor coaches with all bogies considered as powered: the formula are those given in § 3.4.1 (Traction

units)

— Railcars and MU motor coaches considered to have only trailer bogies: the formulae are those given in § 3.4.3

(Passenger coaches and luggage vans)

— Railcars with a motor bogie and a trailer bogie: the reduction formulae given in 3.4.1 may either be applied as they
stand, or replaced by the following formulae which offer manufacturers slight advantages in the centre-part and at the
ends of the vehicle body.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/179

a)

Between the pivots (1)

þ w0

∞

nµ
a

þ z − 0,015

Ei ¼

1,465 − d
2

anµ þ n2

µ þ

Ei ¼

þ q þ w∞

a − nµ
a

:

p2
4
500

a − nµ
a

þ

p02
4

a − nµ
a

z þ xi>0 − 0,015 − 0,015

− 0,065k

:

nµ
a

þ

1,465 − d
2

:

a − nµ
a

þ q þ wið250Þ

a − nµ
a

þ w0

ið250Þ

nµ
a

þ

(603a)

(604a)

with xi ¼

1
750

anµ − n2

µ þ

p2
4

:

a − nµ
a

þ

p02
4

:

nµ
a

− 100

!

(cid:0)

þ wið150Þ − wið250Þ

(cid:1)a − nµ
a

(cid:0)
þ w0

ið250Þ − W0

ið150Þ

(cid:1)nµ
a

k and z= (see table 2)

b)

Beyond the pivots on the motor bogie side (1)

(cid:18)

1,465 − d
2

Ea ¼

(cid:19)

þ q þ w∞

an þ n2 −

:

p2
n þ a
a
4
500

þ

Ea ¼
z þ xi>0 − 0,030 − 0,065k

2n þ a
a
n
a

:

þ

p02
4

þ z − 0,015

1,465 − d
2

:

n þ a
a

þ q

2n þ a
a

þ w0

ið250Þ

n
a

þ w0

að250Þ

n þ a
a

þ

(605b)

(606b)

with

xa ¼

1
750

an þ n2 þ

p2
4

:

n
a

−

p02
4

:

n þ a
a

Þ
− 120 − 20k

ð

!

(cid:0)

þ wið150Þ − wið250Þ

(cid:0)
þ w0

(cid:1)n
a

að150Þ − W0

að250Þ

(cid:1)n þ a
a

k and z= (see Table 2)

NOTES

(1)

This value applies to those parts no more than 0,400 m above the running surface and those which may descend
below this level as a result of wear and vertical movements.

C.4.2.2.2. G C k i n e m a t i c g a u g e

The formulae to be applied are those associated with the G1 profile, irrespective of the value of h.

C.4.2.3.

Passenger coaches and luggage vans

C.4.2.3.1. G A a n d G B k i n e m a t i c g a u g e s

— Height h ≤ 3,25m. The formulae to be applied are those associated with the G1 profile.

— Height h > 3,25m. The formulae to be applied are those associated with the G1 profile, with the exception of the

formulae given under cases a) and b) below.

a)

1)

Vehicles for which the play w is independent of the track position radius or varies linearly with the track curvature

For sections between the bogie pivots

When an − n2 þ

(cid:0)

− 500 W∞ − Wið250Þ

(cid:1)

p2
4

(cid:18)

1,465 − d
2

Ei ¼

(cid:19)

þ q þ w þ z − 0,015

≤250 1,465 − d

ð

Þ þ 32,5k

When an − n2 þ

(cid:0)

− 500 w∞ − wið250Þ

(cid:1)

p2
4

>250 1,465 − d

ð

Þ þ 32,5k

p2
4

(cid:18)

Ei ¼

an − n2 þ

500

with xa ¼

1
750

þ q þ wið250Þ þ z þ xi>0 − 0,015 − 0,065k

an − n2 þ

(cid:19)

− 100

þ wið150Þ − wið250Þ

p2
4

(611)

(612)

(1) The reduction to be applied for the same value of n is the greatest obtained with formula (603a) and (604a)

 
 
L 344/180

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

k and z= (see table 3)

2)

For sections beyond the bogie pivots

When

an þ n2 −

p2
4

h

(cid:0)

− 500 w∞ − wið250Þ

(cid:0)

þ w∞ − wið250Þ

(cid:1)n
a

i

(cid:1)n þ a
a

(cid:20) 250 1,465 − d

ð

Þ

n
a

Þ
þ 7,5 þ 32,5k

ð

(cid:18)

1,465 − d
2

Ea ¼

þ q þ w∞

(cid:19)

2n þ a
a

þ z − 0,015

(613)

When

an þ n2 −

p2
4

h

(cid:0)

− 500 w∞ − wið250Þ

(cid:0)

þ w∞ − wað250Þ

(cid:1)n
a

i
(cid:1)n þ a
a

Þ
> 250 1,465 − d

ð

n
a

þ 7,5 þ 32,5k

ð

Þ

p2
4

an þ n2 −

Ea ¼
0,030 − 0,065k

500

þ

1,465 − d
2

n þ a
:
a

þ q

2n þ a
a

þ wið250Þ

n
a

þ wað250Þ

n þ a
a

þ z þ xa>0 −

(614)

with xa ¼

(cid:18)

1
750

an þ n2 −

p2
4

(cid:19)

− 120 − 20k

ð

Þ

(cid:0)

þ wið150Þ − wið250Þ

(cid:1)n
a

(cid:0)

þ wað150Þ − Wað250Þ

(cid:1)n þ a
a

k and z= (see table 3)

b)

1)

Vehicles for which the play w varies non-linearly with the track curvature

For sections between the bogie pivots

For each point on the vehicle, the value of Ei to be taken is the greatest obtained from application of:

— formula (611) above

— formulae (615) and (616) below in which the value of R to be taken maximises the portion between the square

brackets

2

an − n2 þ

6
6
4

Ei ¼

p2
4

3

Þ
− 7,5 þ 32,5k

ð

2R

þ wiðRÞ

7
7
5 þ q þ z

with ∞ > R ≥ 250 m

2

6
6
4

Ei ¼

an − n2 þ

p2
4
2R

3

− 100

þ wiðRÞ

7
7
5 þ q þ z þ 0,185 − 0,065k

(615)

(616)

with 250 > R ≥ 150 m

k and z = (see table 3)

2)

For sections beyond the bogie pivots

For each point on the vehicle, the value of Ea to be taken is the greatest obtained from application of:

— formula (613) above

— formulae (617) and (618) below in which the value of R to be taken maximises the portion between the square

brackets

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/181

2

6
6
4

Ea ¼

an þ n2 −

p2
4

z − 0,015

Þ
− 7,5 − 32,5k

ð

2R

þ wiðRÞ

n
a

þ waðRÞ

n þ a
a

7
7
5 þ

1,465 − d
:
2

n þ a
a

þ q

2n þ a
a

þ

(617)

3

3

þ wiðRÞ

n
a

þ waðRÞ

n þ a
a

7
7
5 þ

1,465 − d
2

n þ a
:
a

þ q:

2n þ a
a

þ

(618

with ∞ > R ≥ 250 m

2

6
6
4

Ea ¼

an þ n2 −

p2
4

− 120 − 20k

ð

Þ

2R

z − 0,120 − 0,105k

with 250 > R ≥ 150 m

k and z= (see Table 3)

TABLE 3:

GA GAUGE

if 3,25<h<3,88 m, k ¼

h − 3,25
0,63

if h ≥ 3,88 m, k = 1

GB GAUGE

if 3,25<h<4,11 m, k ¼

h − 3,25
0,86

if h ≥ 4,11 m, k = 1

z ¼

h

s
30

(cid:0)
þ tan η0 − 1°

(cid:1)
>0

i

ð

h − hc

Þ þ

h

s
10

ð

h − hc

C.4.2.3.2. G C k i n e m a t i c g a u g e

Þ − 0,04 − 0,01k

ð

Þ
Þ h − 0,5
ð

i

>0

The formulae to be applied are those associated with the G1 profile, irrespective of the value of h.

C.4.2.4.

Wagons

C.4.2.4.1. G A a n d G B k i n e m a t i c g a u g e s

— Height h ≤ 3,25m. The formulae to be applied are those associated with the G1 profile.

— Height h > 3,25m. The formulae to be applied are those associated with the G1 profile, with the exception of the

formulae given under cases a) and b) below.

a)

Vehicles not mounted on bogies

For sections between end axles

When an -n2 ≤ 7,5 + 32,5 k

Ei ¼

1,465 − d
2

þ q þ w∞ þ z − 0,015

When an -n2 ≤ 7,5 + 32,5 k

Ei ¼

an − n2
500

þ

1,465 − d
2

þ q þ w þ z − 0,030 − 0,065k

with k and z = (see Table 4)

For sections beyond the end axles

(619)

(620)

L 344/182

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

When an + n2 ≤ 7,5 + 32,5 k

(cid:18)

1,465 − d
2

Ea ¼

þ q þ w

(cid:19)

2n þ a
a

þ z − 0,015

When an + n2 > 7,5 + 32,5 k

Ei ¼

an − n2
500

þ

(cid:18)

1,465 − d
2

þ q þ w

(cid:19)

2n þ a
a

þ z − 0,030 − 0,065k

with k and z = (see Table 4)

b)

Bogie vehicles

For sections between the bogie pivots

When an − n2 þ

p2
4

(cid:20) 250 1,465 − d

ð

Þ þ 32,5k

Ei ¼

1,465 − d
2

þ q þ w þ z − 0,015

When an − n2 þ

p2
4

> 250 1,465 − d

ð

Þ þ 32,5k

Ei ¼

an þ n2 −

500

p2
4

þ q þ wið250Þ þ z þ xi>0 − 0,015 − 0,065k

with xi ¼

1
750

(cid:18)

an − n2 þ

p2
4

(cid:19)

− 100

þ wið150Þ − wið250Þ

k and z = (see Table 4)

For sections beyond the bogie pivots

When an þ n2 −

p2
4

(cid:20) 250 1,465 − d

ð

Þ

n
a

þ 7,5 þ 32,5k

ð

Þ

(cid:18)

1,465 − d
2

Ea ¼

þ q þ w∞

(cid:19)

2n þ a
a

þ z − 0,015

When an þ n2 −

p2
4

> 250 1,465 − d

ð

Þ

n
a

þ 7,5 þ 32,5k

ð

Þ

p2
4

an þ n2 −

500

Ea ¼

þ

1,465 − d
2

n þ a
:
a

þ q þ w

ð

Þ

2n þ a
a

þ z þ xa>0 − 0,030 − 0,065k

with xa ¼

(cid:18)

1
750

an þ n2 −

p2
4

(cid:19)

− 120 − 20k

ð

Þ

k and z= (see table 4)

TABLE 4:

GA GAUGE

(621)

(622)

(623)

(624)

(625)

(614)

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/183

if 3,25<h<3,88 m, k ¼

h − 3,25
0,63

if h≥3,88 m,k=1

GB GAUGE

if 3,25<h<4,11 m k ¼

h − 3,25
0,86

if h≥4,11 m, k=1

(cid:20)

s
30

z ¼

(cid:18)

þ tan η0 þ arctan

Þ > 0

(cid:19)
ð

ð

J − 0,005
bG

(cid:21)

1 þ s

Þ − 1°

>0 h − hc

ð

Þ>0 þ

h

s
10

ð

h − hc

Þ − 0,04 − 0,01k

ð

ð
Þ h − 0,05

Þ

i

>0

C.4.2.4.2. G C k i n e m a t i c g a u g e

The formulae to be applied are those associated with the G1 profile, irrespective of the value of h.

C.5.

GAUGES REQUIRING BI- OR MULTILATERAL AGREEMENTS

The Infrastructure Managers of the different countries are free to conclude bi- or multilateral agreements between
themselves in order to permit the running over the whole or part of their respective lines, of vehicles other than those built
to the G1, GA, GB or GC profiles.

In order for such agreements to be made, it is sufficient to define a kinematic reference profile and associated rules.

C.5.1.

G2 gauge

C.5.1.1.

Reference profile of G2 static gauge

Certain Railways (1) authorise trains to run on their lines with loads fitting the reference profile shown below, for which the
rules defined for static gauge G1 apply.

(1)

Permitted by: HSH, GySEV, BHEV, PKP, BDZ, CFR, CD, ZSR, MAV, JZ, CH, TCDD, DB, ÖBB, CFL, NS, DSB, CFS, BV and IRR, except in the
following stations:
JZ:
MAV:

Divaca, Sezana, Hrpelje-Kozina, Koper, Kilovce, Ilirska, Bistrica, Sapljane, Jurdani, Opatija-Matulji, Rijeka,
Budapest-Deli pu.-Budapest.Kelenföld

L 344/184

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Fig. C22

The Rules for the G1 static gauge should be applied.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/185

C.5.1.2.

Reference profile of G2 kinematic gauge

The following kinematic reference profile shall be considered equivalent for the purpose of applying the standards
pertaining to kinematic profiles.

Fig. C23

C.5.2.

GB1 and GB2 gauges

C.5.2.1.

General

Gauges GB1 and GB2 were produced on the basis of certain combined transport requirements that emerged beginning in
1989.

Use of gauges GB1 and GB2 is subject to bi- or multilateral agreements being made between Infrastructure Managers.

L 344/186

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

C.5.2.2.

GB1 and GB2 static reference profiles (loading gauges)

GB1 static reference profile

Fig. C24

Note: Up to a height of 3 220 mm, the reference profile of the GB1 gauge is identical to that of the G1 gauge.
GB2 static reference profile

Fig. C25

Note: Up to a height of 3 220 mm, the reference profile of the GB2 gauge is identical to that of the G1 gauge.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/187

C.5.2.3.

Rules for GB1 and GB2 static reference profiles

The rules to be applied are those for the GB gauge, except for the coefficient k given in Table 1, the value of which is to be
applied is given in the table below:

GB1 and GB2 GAUGE

if 3,22<h<4,18 m, k ¼

h − 3,22
0,96

if h ≥ 4,18 m, k = 1

C.5.2.4.

GB1 and GB2 kinematic reference profiles

GB1 kinematic reference profile

Fig. C26

Note: Up to a height of 3 220 mm, the reference profile of the GB1 gauge is identical to that of the G1 gauge.

GB2 kinematic reference profile

L 344/188

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Fig. C27

Note: Up to a height of 3 220 mm, the reference profile of the GB2 gauge is identical to that of the G1 gauge.

C.5.2.5.

Rules for GB1 and GB2 kinematic reference profiles

The rules applicable are those for the GB gauge, except for the coefficient k given in Tables 2, 3 and 4, the value of which is
to be applied is given in the table below:

GB1 and GB2 GAUGE

if 3,25<h<4,21 m, k ¼

h − 3,25
0,96

if h ≥ 4,21 m, k = 1

C.5.3.

Gauge 3.3

C.5.3.1.

General

Kinematic gauge 3.3 can be used for services running on the French network (Réseau Ferré National — RFN).

This gauge affords additional space towards the top compared with the G1 gauge. It is applicable to vehicles (for example,
double-decker coaches) that run only on lines with gauge 3.3 clearances.

Gauge 3.3 concerns only the top part of the reference profile, above 3,25 m, the bottom part being common to the G1
gauge. As any other gauge, it is associated with a reference profile and associated rules.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/189

C.5.3.2.

Reference profile of 3.3 kinematic gauge

Fig. C28

C.5.3.3.

Rules for the reference profile to determine the maximum construction gauge

The rules for the reference profile of the 3.3 gauge are identical to those for the G1 gauge, except for the following specific
details:

— Permitted projections So (S)

— Quasi-static displacements z.

C.5.3.3.1.

P e r m i t t e d p r o j e c t i o n s S o ( S )

— For the parts located higher than 3,500 m from the running surface, the value So of the projection to be taken into

account as a function of the curve to calculate the reductions Ei and Ea is

irrespective of the type of vehicle.

37,5
R

L 344/190

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

— Thus, the effective projections S must not exceed the following So values:

— 0,15 m on 250 m radius curves

— 0,15 m on 150 m radius curves.

Moreover, on straight (tangent) track, So is set equal to 0,015 m.

— For the parts located higher than 3,250 m lower than 3,500 m above the running surface, that is the parts between
levels A and B of the reference profile, there are no rules for fixing the value of So of the maximum projection. The
determination the maximum construction gauge between these two levels is done by joining the point of the
maximum construction gauge corresponding to Level A, found by calculating the reductions from the projections
according to the rules for the G1 gauge, to the point of the maximum construction gauge corresponding to Level B,
found by calculating the reductions from the above-stated projections.

— For the parts located less than 3,250 m above the running surface, the general rule for the G1 gauge should be

applied.

C.5.3.3.2. Q u a s i - s t a t i c d i s p l a c e m e n t s z

For suspended components, located at a height h, the value of z is given by the formula:

(cid:20)

S
30

Z ¼

(cid:2)
þ tan η0 − 1o

(cid:3)

>0

(cid:21)
׀h − hC׀ þ

(cid:20)

S
10

C.5.3.4.

Reduction formulae

Reduction formulae applicable to:

׀h − hC׀ − 0,03 h − 0,5

½

(cid:138)>0

(cid:21)

>0

— tractive vehicles (locomotives, power cars)
— multiple units
— coaches

paragraph C.5.3.4.1
paragraph C.5.3.4.2
paragraph C.5.3.4.3

C.5.3.4.1.

R e d u c t i o n f o r m u l a e a p p l i c a b l e t o t r a c t i v e u n i t s ( d i m e n s i o n s i n m e t r e s )

Tractive units for which the play w is independent of the track position radius or varies linearly with the track
curvature

Internal reductions Ei (where n = ni)

Sections between the end axles of traction vehicles not mounted on bogies or between the bogie pivots.

when an − n2 þ

(cid:0)

− 500 W∞ − Wið250Þ

P2
4

Ei ¼

1,465 − d
2

þ q þ W∞ þ z − 0,015

when an − n2 þ

(cid:0)

− 500 W∞ − Wið250Þ

P2
4

(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:20) 67,5, the position on straight track is preponderant:

> 67,5, the position on curved track is preponderant:

an − n2 þ

P2
4
(cid:18)

þ

1,465 − d
2
an − n2 þ

P2
4

500
1
750

Ei ¼

with xi ¼

þ q þið250Þ þZ þ xi½

(cid:19)

(cid:138)>0 − 0,150

− 75

þ Wið150Þ − Wið250Þ

(101

(102)

(103)

External reductions Ea (where n = na)

Sections beyond the end axles of vehicles not mounted on bogies or the bogie pivots of bogied tractive vehicles.

when an þ n2 −

P2
4

h

(cid:0)

− 500 W∞ − Wið250Þ

(cid:0)

þ W∞ − Wað250Þ

(cid:1)n
a

i
(cid:1)n þ a
a

(cid:20) 67,5,the position on straight track is preponderant:

(cid:18)

1,465 − d
2

Ea ¼

þ q þ W∞

(cid:19)

2n þ a
a

þ z − 0,015

(106)

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/191

when an þ n2 −

P2
4

h

(cid:0)

− 500 W∞ − Wið250Þ

(cid:0)

þ W∞ − Wað250Þ

(cid:1)n
a

i
(cid:1)n þ a
a

> 67,5, the position on curved track is preponderant:

an þ n2 −

Ea ¼

(cid:18)

P2
4

þ

(cid:18)

500
1
750

(cid:19)

(cid:0)

þ q
(cid:19)

1,465 − d
2
P2
4

− 75

mit xa ¼

an þ n2 −

þ Wið150Þ − Wið250Þ

n
a
(cid:1)n
a

2n þ a
a

þ Wið250Þ

þ Wað250Þ

n þ a
a

þ z þ xa½

(cid:138)>0 − 0,150

(cid:0)

þ Wað150Þ − Wað250Þ

(cid:1)n þ a
a

(107)

(108)

Tractive vehicles for which the play w varies non-linearly with the track curvature (exceptional case)

For each section of the tractive vehicle, the reduction to be taken is the greatest of those resulting from the application of the
above-given formulae, in which the value of R to be used is that which gives the highest value for the part between square
brackets, and the formula (101) or (106).

Internal reductions Ei (with n = ni)

When ∞ > R ≥ 250

an − n2 þ

Ei ¼

3

− 67,5

þ wiðRÞ

7
7
5 þ

1,465 − d
2

þ q þ z − 0,015

p2
4
2R

When 250 > R ≥ 150

an − n2 þ

p2
4

− 75

2R

3

þ wiðRÞ

7
7
5 þ

1,465 − d
2

þ q þ z

Ei ¼

2

6
6
4

2

6
6
4

(104)

(105)

In practice, formulae (105) and (110) have no effect, since the variation in play w, resulting from the variable stops taking
effect, begins only when R>250 m.

When ∞ > R ≥ 250

2

6
6
4

Ea ¼

an þ n2 −

p2
4
2R

3

− 67,5

þ wiðRÞ

n
a

þ waðRÞ

n þ a
a

7
7
5 þ

(cid:18)

1,465 − d
2

(cid:19)

þ q

2n þ a
a

þ z − 0,015

When 250> R ≥ 150

2

6
6
4

Ea ¼

an þ n2 þ

p2
4

− 75

2R

3

þ wiðRÞ

n
a

þ waðRÞ

n þ a
a

7
7
5 þ

(cid:18)

1,465 − d
2

(cid:19)

þ q

2n þ a
a

þ z

External reductions Ea (where n = na)

When ∞ > R ≥ 250

2

6
6
4

Ea ¼

an þ n2 −

p2
4
2R

3

− 67,5

þ wiðRÞ

n
a

þ waðRÞ

n þ a
a

7
7
5 þ

(cid:18)

1,465 − d
2

(cid:19)

þ q

2n þ a
a

þ z − 0,015

(109)

When 250> R ≥ 150

2

6
6
4

an þ n2 þ

2R

P2
4

− 75

Ea ¼

3

þ WiðRÞn
a

þ WaðRÞ

n þ a
a

7
7
5 þ

(cid:18)

1,465 − d
2

(cid:19)

þ q

2n þ a
a

þ z

(110)

C.5.3.4.2.

R e d u c t i o n f o r m u l a e a p p l i c a b l e t o m u l t i p l e u n i t s ( d i m e n s i o n s i n m e t r e s ) *

For multiple units having a motor bogie and a trailer bogie (see the table for Gauge G1):

Internal reductions Ei(1)

Sections between bogie pivots

L 344/192

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

þ W0
∞

nμ
a

þ z − 0,015

1,465 − d
2
anμ − n2

μ þ

a − nμ
a
P
4

02

þ

nμ
:
a

þ q þ W∞
P2
a − nμ
4
a
500

:

(cid:138)>0 − 0,150

Ei ¼

Ei ¼
xi½

with

þ

1,465 − d
2

a − nμ
:
a

þ q þ Wið250Þ

a − nμ
a

þ W0

ið250Þ

nμ
a

þ z þ

(cid:20)

xi ¼
(cid:16)

W

1
750
ið150Þ − W

0

anμ − n2

μ þ
(cid:17)nμ
a

0
ið250Þ

:

a − nμ
a

þ

02

P
4

nμ
:
a

(cid:21)

− 75

(cid:0)

þ Wið150Þ − Wið250Þ

(cid:1)a − nμ
a

þ

P2
4

External reductions Ea(2) motor bogie end (at the front in the running direction)

Sections beyond the bogie pivots (where n = na)

(cid:20)

1,465 − d
2

(cid:21)

þ q

Ea ¼

2n þ a
a

þ W∞

n þ a
a

þ W0
∞

n
a

þ z − 0,015

þ

02

P
4

n
:
a

n þ a
:
a

P2
4
500

an þ n2 −

Ea ¼
xa½

(cid:138)>0 − 0,150

with

þ

1,465 − d
:
2

n þ a
a

þ q

2n þ a
a

þ W0

ið250Þ

n
a

þ Wað250Þ

n þ a
a

þ z þ

xa ¼

1
750

(cid:20)
an þ n2 −

P2
4

n þ a
:
a

þ

02

P
4

n
:
a

(cid:21)

− 75

(cid:16)
þ W0

ið150Þ − W0

ið250Þ

(cid:17)n
a

(cid:0)

þ Wað150Þ − Wað250Þ

(cid:1)n þ a
a

(1), (2) The reduction to apply for a given value of n is the greatest one resulting from the formulae:

— (101 a) or (102 a) and (103 a);
— (106 a) or (107 a) and (108 a).

External reductions Ea(1) trailer bogie end (at the front in the running direction)

Sections beyond the bogie pivots (where n = na)

(cid:20)

1,465 − d
2

an þ n2 þ

Ea ¼

Ea ¼

(cid:21)

2n þ a
a
p02
4

−

n þ a
:
a

þ q

p2
n
:
a
4
500

þ w∞

n
a

þ w0
∞

n þ a
a

þ z − 0,015

(cid:18)

þ

1,465 − d
2

þ q

(cid:19)

2n þ a
a

þ wið250Þ

n
a

þ w0

að250Þ

n þ a
a

þ z þ

xa½

(cid:138)>0 − 0,150
1
750

(cid:20)
an þ n2 þ

xa ¼

p2
4

n
:
a

−

p02
4

n þ a
:
a

(cid:21)

− 75

(cid:0)

þ wið150Þ − wið250Þ

(cid:1)n
a

(cid:16)
þ w0

að150Þ − w0

að250Þ

(cid:17)n þ a
a

(101a)

(102a)

(103a)

(106a)

(107a)

(108a)

(106b)

(107b)

(108b)

(1)

The reduction to apply for a given value of n is the greatest one resulting from the formulae:

(106 b) or (107 b) and (108 b).

C.5.3.4.3.

R e d u c t i o n f o r m u l a e a p p l i c a b l e t o c o a c h e s a n d o t h e r p a s s e n g e r v e h i c l e s ( d i m e n -
s i o n s i n m e t r e s )

For bogie coaches, except the bogies themselves and their associated parts.

Coaches for which the play w is independent of the track position radius or varies linearly with the track curvature.

Internal reductions Ei

Sections between bogie pivots (where n = ni)

when an − n2 þ

(cid:0)

− 500 w∞ − wið250Þ

(cid:1)

p2
4

(cid:20) 250 1,465 − d

ð

Þ þ 67,5

the position on straight track is preponderant:

Ea ¼

1,465 − d
2

þ q þ w∞ þ z − 0,015

(201)

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/193

when an − n2 þ

(cid:0)

− 500 w∞ − wið250Þ

(cid:1)

p2
4

> 250 1,465 − d

ð

Þ þ 67,5

the position on curved track is preponderant:

an − n2 þ

p2
4
(cid:18)

500
1
750

Ei ¼

þ q þ wið250Þ þ z þ xi½

(cid:138)>0 − 0,150

with xi ¼

an − n2 þ

− 75

þ wið150Þ − wið250Þ

(cid:19)

p2
4

(202)

(203)

External reductions Ea

Sections beyond bogie pivots (where n = na)

When an þ n2 −

p2
4

h
(cid:0)

− 500 w∞ − wið250Þ

(cid:0)

þ w∞ − wað250Þ

(cid:1)n
a

i

(cid:1)n þ a
a

(cid:20) 250 1,465 − d

ð

Þ

n
a

þ 67,5

the position on straight track is preponderant:

(cid:18)

1,465 − d
2

Ea ¼

þ q þ w∞

(cid:19)

2n þ a
a

þ z − 0,015

When an þ n2 −

p2
4

h
(cid:0)

− 500 w∞ − wið250Þ

(cid:0)

þ w∞ − wað250Þ

(cid:1)n
a

i

(cid:1)n þ a
a

> 250 1,465 − d

ð

Þ

the position on curved track is preponderant:

(206)

n
a

þ 67,5

an þ n2 −

p2
4
(cid:18)

þ

1,465 − d
2
an þ n2 −

p2
4

500
1
750

Ea ¼

with xa ¼

n þ a
:
a
(cid:19)

þ q

(cid:0)

2n þ a
a

n þ a
a

þ wað250Þ

(cid:0)

n
þ wið250Þ
a
(cid:1)n
a

þ z þ xa½
(cid:1)n þ a
a

− 75

þ wið150Þ − wið250Þ

þ wað150Þ − wað250Þ

(cid:138)>0 − 0,150

(207)

(208)

Coaches for which the play w varies non-linearly with the track curvature.

For each section of the coach, the reduction to be taken is the greatest of those resulting from the application of the above-
given formulae, in which the value of R to be used is that which gives the highest value for the part between square brackets,
and the formula (201) or (206).

Internal reductions Ei (where n = ni)

When ∞ > R ≥ 150

2

6
6
4

Ei ¼

an − n2 þ

2R

p2
4

− 75

3

þ wiðRÞ

7
7
5 þ q þ z

(204)

External reductions Ea (where n = na)

When ∞ > R ≥ 250

2

6
6
4

Ea ¼

an þ n2 −

p2
4
2R

− 67,5

3

þ WiðRÞ

n
a

þ WaðRÞ

n þ a
a

7
7
5 þ

1,465 − d
2

:

n þ a
a

þ q

2n þ a
a

þ z − 0,015

When 250 > R ≥ 150

2

6
6
4

an þ n2 −

p2
4

− 75

2R

Ea ¼

3

þ WiðRÞ

n
a

þ WaðRÞ

n þ a
a

7
7
5 þ

1,465 − d
2

n þ a
:
a

þ q

2n þ a
a

þ z

L 344/194

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

C.5.4.

Gauge GB-M6

C.5.4.1.

General

The GB-M6 kinematic gauge can be used in services running on the Belgian (SNCB) network.

The GB-M6 kinematic gauge is based on the same principles as the G1 gauge, it is adapted to the SNCB infrastructure and its
reduction formulae are likewise adapted as concerns the verification radii and the projections permitted in curves.

The permitted projections are more generous than those for the G1 gauge and therefore make it possible to run wider
vehicles.

Concerning the pantograph, in addition to the UIC 505-1 regulations allowing vehicles equipped with 1 950 mm-wide
pantographs to run, the SNCB infrastructure also accommodates 1 760 mm-wide pantographs fitted on more flexible
vehicles with characteristics as follows: s ≤ 0,4 and (q + w) ≤ 0,065 m.

The bogies as well as their ancillary components fitted to vehicles built to this gauge strictly follow the rules for the G1
gauge.

Suspended parts located at a level, or which might descend to a level, less than 100 mm above the running surface due to
vertical displacements are calculated in accordance with the G1 rules.

When, due to vertical movements, a point located near the 1 170 mm level might rise above or drop below this level, it is
necessary to consider the minimum permitted width, by using either the formulae governing the parts above 1 170 mm, or
the formulae governing the parts below or at the 1 170 mm level.

The choice between the reduction formulae for tractive units or for hauled units is made in the same way as for the G1
gauge, based on the coefficient of adhesion at start-up.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/195

C.5.4.2.

Reference profile of the GB-M6 kinematic gauge

Fig. C29

C.5.4.3.

Reduction formulae

C.5.4.3.1.

T r a c t i v e v e h i c l e s

a)

Reduction formulae for h > 1 170 mm.

Sections between bogie pivots

When

n a − n

ð

Þ þ

800

p2
4

(cid:0)

− w∞ − wið400Þ

(cid:1)

(cid:20) 0,015

Ei ¼

1,465 − d
2

þ q þ w∞ þ z − 0,015

When

n a − n

ð

Þ þ

800

p2
4

(cid:0)

− w∞ − wið400Þ

(cid:1)

> 0,015

n a − n

ð

Þ þ

Ei ¼

800

p2
4

þ wið400Þ þ

1,465 − d
2

(cid:2)
þ q þ z þ xi þ ðyiÞ>0

(cid:3)

>0 − 0,030

L 344/196

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

2

6
6
4

n a − n

ð

Þ þ

800

with xi ¼

6
10

2

6
6
4

16
15

with yi ¼

n a − n

ð

Þ þ

800

p2
4

p2
4

3

7
(cid:0)
7
5 − 0,042 − wið400Þ − wið250Þ

(cid:1)

3

7
(cid:0)
7
5 − 0,108 − wið250Þ − wið150Þ

(cid:1)

Sections beyond bogie pivots

p2
4

n a þ n

ð

Þ −

800

When

h

(cid:0)

− w∞ − wið400Þ

(cid:0)

þ w∞ − wað400Þ

(cid:1)n
a

i
(cid:1)n þ a
a

(cid:20) 0,015

(cid:18)

1,465 − d
2

Ea ¼

þ q þ w∞

(cid:19)

2n þ a
a

þ z − 0,015

p2
4

n a þ n

ð

Þ −

800

When

h

(cid:0)

− w∞ − wið400Þ

(cid:0)

þ w∞ − wað400Þ

(cid:1)n
a

i
(cid:1)n þ a
a

> 0,015

n a þ n

ð

Þ −

p2
4

Ea ¼

(cid:0)

þ q þ wið400Þ

(cid:1)n
a

(cid:0)

þ q þ wað400Þ

(cid:1)n þ a
a

þ

(cid:18)

1,465 − d
2

(cid:19)

2n þ a
a

(cid:2)

þ z þ xa þ ðyaÞ>0

(cid:3)
>0 − 0,030

800

2

6
6
4

6
10

with xa ¼

n a þ n

ð

Þ −

800

2

6
6
4

16
15

n a þ n

ð

Þ −

800

with ya ¼

p2
4

p2
4

3

h
7
(cid:0)
7
5 − 0,042 − wið400Þ − wið250Þ

3

h

7
(cid:0)
7
5 − 0,108 − wið250Þ − wið150Þ

(cid:1)n
a

(cid:1)n
a

(cid:0)

þ wað400Þ − wað250Þ

i
(cid:1)n þ a
a

(cid:0)

þ wað250Þ − wað150Þ

i

(cid:1)n þ a
a

c)

Reduction formulae for heights 100 < h ≤ 1 170 mm.

Sections between bogie pivots

P2
4

ð
n a − n

Þ þ

2000

When

(cid:0)

− W∞ − Wið1000Þ

(cid:1)

(cid:20) 0,005

E1 ¼

1,465 − d
2

þ q þ W∞ þ z − 0,015

P2
4

ð
n a − n

Þ þ

2000

When

(cid:0)

− W∞ − Wið1000Þ

(cid:1)

> 0,005

Ei ¼

ð
n a − n

Þ þ

P2
4

2000

2

with xi ¼

17
3

6
6
4

ð
n a − n

Þ þ

2000

þ

1,465 − d
2

þ q þ Wið1000Þ þ z þ xi½

(cid:138)>0 − 0,020

P2
4

3

7
7
5 − 0,150 − Wið1000Þ − Wið150Þ

(cid:0)

(cid:1)

Sections beyond bogie pivots

P2
4

ð
n a þ n

Þ −

2000

When

h
(cid:0)

− W∞ − Wið1000Þ

(cid:0)

þ W∞ − Wað1000Þ

(cid:1)n
a

i

(cid:1)n þ a
a

(cid:20) 0,005

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/197

(cid:18)

1,465 − d
2

Ea ¼

þ q þ W∞

(cid:19)

2n þ a
a

þ z − 0,015

P2
4

ð
n a þ n

Þ −

2000

When:

h
(cid:0)

− W∞ − Wið1000Þ

(cid:0)

þ W∞ − Wað1000Þ

(cid:1)n
a

i
(cid:1)n þ a
a

> 0,005

Ea ¼

ð
n a þ n

Þ −

2000

2

with xa ¼

17
3

6
6
4

(cid:18)

P2
4

þ

(cid:19)

1,465 − d
2

2n þ a
a

(cid:0)

þ q þ Wið1000Þ

(cid:1)n
a

(cid:0)

þ q þ Wað1000Þ

(cid:1)n þ a
a

þ z þ xa½

(cid:138)>0 − 0,020

ð
n a þ n

Þ −

P2
4

3

h

7
7
5 − 0,150 − Wið1000Þ − Wið150Þ

(cid:0)

(cid:0)

þ Wað1000Þ − Wað150Þ

(cid:1)n
a

i

(cid:1)n þ a
a

2000

C.5.4.3.2. H a u l e d v e h i c l e s

a)

Reduction formulae for height h >1 170 mm.

Sections between bogie pivots

When

n a − n

ð

Þ þ

800

p2
4

(cid:0)

− w∞ − wið400Þ

(cid:1)

(cid:20)

1,465 − d
2

Ei ¼

1,465 − d
2

þ q þ w∞ þ z − 0,015

When

n a − n

ð

Þ þ

800

p2
4

(cid:0)

− w∞ − wið400Þ

(cid:1)

>

1,465 − d
2

(cid:0) (cid:1)
þ q þ wið400Þ þ z þ xi þ yi

h

i

>0

− 0,015

>0

p2
4

n a − n

ð

Þ þ

Ei ¼

800

2

with xi ¼

6
10

6
6
4

n a − n

ð

Þ þ

800

2

6
6
4

16
15

with yi ¼

n a − n

ð

Þ þ

800

p2
4

p2
4

3

7
(cid:0)
7
5 − 0,042 − wið400Þ − wið250Þ

(cid:1)

3

7
(cid:0)
7
5 − 0,108 − wið250Þ − wið150Þ

(cid:1)

Sections beyond bogie pivots

p2
4

n a þ n

ð

Þ −

800

When

h

(cid:0)

− w∞ − wið400Þ

(cid:0)

þ w∞ − wað400Þ

(cid:1)n
a

i
(cid:1)n þ a
a

(cid:20)

(cid:18)

1,465 − d
2

(cid:19)

n
a

þ 0,015

(cid:18)

1,465 − d
2

Ea ¼

þ q þ w∞

(cid:19)

2n þ a
a

þ z − 0,015

p2
4

n a þ n

ð

Þ −

800

When

h

(cid:0)

− w∞ − wið400Þ

(cid:0)

þ w∞ − wað400Þ

(cid:1)n
a

i
(cid:1)n þ a
a

>

(cid:18)

1,465 − d
2

(cid:19)

n
a

þ 0,015

Ea ¼

n a þ n

ð

Þ −

800

p2
4

(cid:0)

þ q þ wið400Þ

(cid:1)n
a

(cid:0)

þ q þ wað400Þ

(cid:1)n þ a
a

þ

(cid:18)

1,465 − d
2

(cid:19)

n þ a
a

h
(cid:0) (cid:1)
þ z þ xa þ ya

>0

i

− 0,030

>0

0

B
B
@

6
10

with xa ¼

n a þ n

ð

Þ −

800

p2
4

1

h
C
(cid:0)
C
A − 0,042 − wið400Þ − wið250Þ

(cid:1)n
a

(cid:0)

þ wað400Þ − wað250Þ

i
(cid:1)n þ a
a

L 344/198

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

0

B
B
@

n a þ n

ð

Þ −

p2
4

1

h

C
(cid:0)
C
A − 0,108 − wið250Þ − wið150Þ

(cid:1)n
a

(cid:0)

þ wað250Þ − wað150Þ

i

(cid:1)n þ a
a

800

with ya ¼

16
15

b)

Reduction formulae for heights 100 < h ≤1 170 mm.

Sections between bogie pivots

When

n a − n

ð

Þ þ

2000

p2
4

(cid:0)

− w∞ − wið1000Þ

(cid:1)

(cid:20)

1,465 − d
2

− 0,010

Ei ¼

1,465 − d
2

þ q þ w∞ þ z − 0,015

When

n a − n

ð

Þ þ

2000

p2
4

(cid:0)

− w∞ − wið1000Þ

(cid:1)

>

1,465 − d
2

− 0,010

n a − n

ð

Þ þ

Ei ¼

2000

0

B
B
@

17
3

with: xi ¼

p2
4

þ q þ wið1000Þ þ z þ ½xi(cid:138)>0 − 0,005

p2
4

1

C
(cid:0)
C
A − 0,150 − wð1000Þ − wið150Þ

(cid:1)

n a − n

ð

Þ þ

2000

Sections beyond bogie pivots

p2
4

n a þ n

ð

Þ −

2000

When

h

(cid:0)

− w∞ − wið1000Þ

(cid:0)

þ w∞ − wað1000Þ

(cid:1)n
a

i
(cid:1)n þ a
a

(cid:20)

(cid:18)

1,465 − d
2

(cid:19)

n
a

þ 0,005

(cid:18)

1,465 − d
2

Ea ¼

þ q þ w∞

(cid:19)

2n þ a
a

þ z − 0,015

P2
4

ð
n a þ n

Þ −

2000

When

h
(cid:0)

− W∞ − Wið1000Þ

(cid:0)

þ W∞ − Wað1000Þ

(cid:1)n
a

i

(cid:1)n þ a
a

>

(cid:18)

ð

1,465 − d
Þ
2

(cid:19)

n
a

þ 0,005

ð
n a þ n

Þ −

2000

(cid:18)

P2
4

þ

(cid:19)

1,465 − d
2

n þ a
a

(cid:0)

þ q þ Wið1000Þ

(cid:1)n
a

(cid:0)

þ q þ Wað1000Þ

(cid:1)n þ a
a

þ z þ xa½

(cid:138)>0 − 0,020

0

B
B
@

17
3

P2
4

ð
n a þ n

Þ −

2000

1

h
C
(cid:0)
C
A − 0,050 − Wið1000Þ − Wið150Þ

(cid:1)n
a

(cid:0)

þ Wað1000Þ − Wað150Þ

i

(cid:1)n þ a
a

Ea ¼

with

xa ¼

C.6.

APPENDIX 1

C.6.1.

Rolling Stock Loading Gauge

C.6.1.1.

Conditions concerning doors, steps and footboards

1.

a)

Carriage doors

In opened position, carriage doors whose bottom-most part is at least 1 050 mm above the rail-top, when the vehicle
is in the lowest permissible position for the buffers, may project beyond the vehiclE's reduced clearance gauge by at
most 200 mm.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/199

On vehicles built after 1.1.1986, the carriage doors must meet this requirement even during door opening.

This requirement does not apply to hinged doors fitted to coaches prior to 1.1.1980.

b)

At shunting speeds up to about 30 km/h, lateral play generally does not exceed 0,02 m.

For bodyside doors located beyond the bogie pivots and whose bottom edges are located less than 1 050 mm above
the rail-top, the necessary reduction of the gauge, in the lowest permissible, 980 mm buffer position, can be reduced

— during opening and

— in opened position

by a maximum of

ð

ð
Þ n þ a

wa − 0,02
a

Þ

This applies only if wa > 0,02 m

It shall be permitted to use doors that meet the requirements of both a) and b) above. In that case, the requirements
under a) must be met also during door opening.

2.

Steps and footboards

When the bottom step is retractable, the necessary reduction of the loading gauge for running with the step down may be
cut back at most by the value:

wi

n
a

þ wa

n þ a
a

C.7.

APPENDIX 2

C.7.1.

Rolling Stock Loading Gauge

C.7.1.1.

Compression of the suspensions for areas outside the support polygon B, C and D

1.

For all vehicles, and wagons in particular, it may be necessary to take account of additional vertical movements fz due
to inclination of the vehicle body (roll, pitching) following, for example, an off-centre load or deflation of a pneumatic
suspension.

The following simplified formulae can be used for these additional compressions:

— Lateral: zones concerned B and C

Compression in phase on 2 bogies and a single rail.

L 344/200

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

— Longitudinal: zones concerned, C and D

Compression on single bogie or axle.

— Deflection of a primary suspension spring and a secondary suspension spring or deflated pneumatic suspension

(calculation principle zone C).

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/201

Deflection (in an initial approach).

Legend :

Niveau 1: Level 1

Etat de charge minimal: Minimum load state

Talonnement du ressort de suspension primaire/secondaire: Bottoming of primary/secondary suspension spring

Formule approchée: Approximate formula

C.8.

APPENDIX 3 ROLLING STOCK LOADING GAUGE

C.8.1.

Calculation of the loading gauge of tilting vehicles

C.8.1.1.

General

The acceptance into international service of rolling stock fitted with tilting body systems shall be subject to bilateral or
multilateral agreements between the railways concerned.

C.8.1.2.

Scope

This Appendix deals with the method of calculating the loading gauge of tilting body vehicles, hereinafter designated by the
abbreviation TBV.

Paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 deal with the technical analysis of the calculation of the loading gauge of TBVs.

Paragraph 5 comments on the conditions of tilting and the speed of TBVs.

L 344/202

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

C.8.1.3.

Field of application

A TBV is defined as a vehicle in which the body can perform a rolling movement relative to the running gear when the
vehicle goes round a curve, with the object of compensating for the centrifugal acceleration.

The appearance and the introduction into international service of trainsets made up of vehicles fitted with tilting body
systems required certain modifications to be made to the rules regarding the loading gauge calculations for conventional
vehicles.

This Appendix deals with the calculation rules for TBVs to obtain the maximum loading gauge for vehicle construction.

C.8.1.4.

Background

The TBV concept began to be developed in the years 1970-80 in several European countries in order to run with higher
speeds on existing lines without detriment to the comfort of the passengers.

The speed in curves of railway vehicles is restricted because of the lateral acceleration which acts on the passengers: this limit
of uncompensated acceleration is of the order of 1 to 1,3 ms-2.

TBV units, in particular those fitted with active systems, can run with higher values of uncompensated acceleration (for
example 1,82 ms-2 for the FIAT ETR 450 train, equivalent to a cant deficiency of 278 mm) because the tilting of the body
enables the values of the lateral acceleration felt by the passengers to be reduced.

C.8.1.5.

Conditions related to safety

The Builders of TBV units shall provide evidence that the vehicles meet the loading gauge under all the different cases of
operation that are planned.

In addition to the calculation of the loading gauge, the Builder shall supply a report on the criteria adopted and on the
devices on which safety depends, that is devices that must ‘fail safe’.

Failure cases which might result in TBV units exceeding the reference profile shall be investigated by the Builder. Depending
on the seriousness of their effects, special measures shall be taken by the Railways, that may concern railway operations,
alarms, warnings to the driver, etc.

The Builder shall also guarantee that the tilting system is so designed that the units cannot run with values of
uncompensated acceleration higher than the values allowed for conventional vehicles if the tilting system fails.

C.8.1.6.

Symbols used

The following additional symbols are used in this Appendix:

IP
IC
E
zP

= value of the cant deficiency considered for the TBV
= value of the maximum cant deficiency permitted by the Permanent Way Department of the Railway (1) 1)
= value of the cant
= quasi-static displacements determined according to the needs of the TBV units

C.8.2.

Basic conditions to determine the loading gauge of TBV units

For the calculation of the loading gauge of TBV units, all the running conditions shall be examined both with the tilting
system active and inactive.

The worst cases shall be examined, in particular:

SITUATION 1)
SITUATION 2)

case of a vehicle running in a curve with maximum cant deficiency (maximum body tilt);
case of a vehicle stationary in a curve. When an active TBV is stopped on a curve its position does not
differ from that of a conventional vehicle and, therefore, can be dealt with using the principles and
formulae applicable to a conventional vehicle.

Note also that for certain types of passive TBV units, such as the TALGO, there is no quasi-static inclination z due to the
flexibility, i.e. s = 0.

(1) The justification of the need to take account of this parameter, fixed by the Permanent Way Department of the Railways, in the rolling

stock dimensional calculations is given in Section 3.2.2 of this Appendix.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/203

C.8.2.1.

Types of body tilting systems

In spite of the above, the different tilting system designs can be grouped according to the method of tilt of the bodies. This
tilt can be obtained either with a natural or an equivalent tilting movement (passive tilt) when the centre of rotation of the
body is above the position of the bodies' centre of gravity, as in the TALGO system, or by jacks which tilt the body
depending on the radius of curvature and the speed (by an active tilting movement as in the FIAT system).

Let us examine the inclination of the body allowed by the different body tilting systems:

In the case of TBVs fitted with ACTIVE systems, the bodies are subjected to a quasi-static tilt caused by the uncompensated
acceleration: This is not, however, the same as the body tilt imparted separately by the system. Figure 1a shows the principle
of the inclination of a vehicle with an active tilt system.

Fig. C30

The actual movements can be broken down into a rotation due to the roll (movement 1) and a rotation superimposed on
that by the active system (movement 2).

In the case of PASSIVE systems the body tilts naturally under the effect of the centrifugal force applied, which is
proportional to the cant deficiency.

Figure 1b shows the principle of inclination of a vehicle with natural or passive tilt.

Fig. C31

L 344/204

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

C.8.3.

Analysis of the formulae

C.8.3.1.

Basic formulae

Depending on the different types of TBV to be investigated (coaches, power cars or multiple unit motor coaches) the
corresponding formulae for the G1 gauge shall be used, to which shall be added all the modifications presented in this
Appendix.

C.8.3.2.

Modifications to be made to the formulae for TBVs

For TBVs the maximum tilt of the body corresponding to the maximum cant deficiency IP must be considered. Given this
requirement, the following terms of the reduction formulae shall have to be reconsidered:

a)

Lateral plays: (1,465-d)/2, q and w (1)

The sign of the lateral displacements, in general, should take account of the centrifugal effect.

The changes required are discussed in § 8.3.2.1.

b)

Quasi-static displacements ‘z’

The term z is valid provided that vehicles do not exceed, when running, the cant deficiency value IP = 200 mm.

As TBVs can exceed this value and, in general, because of the fact that they can run with values of cant deficiency IP
greater than those specified by the Permanent Way Department (IC), the formula needs some modifications which are
discussed in § 8.3.2.2.

c)

For certain types of TBV, especially the active ones, a further term to take account of the body tilt imparted by the
system will need to be added to the formulae for calculating the reductions (see 8.3.2.3).

C.8.3.2.1.

E x p r e s s i o n f o r

t h e v a l u e s o f

t h e l a t e r a l p l a y s w h e n t h e b o d y i s t i l t e d

The condition of maximum body tilt occurs only when the vehicle runs round a curve with the maximum value of IP.

As the vehicle is submitted to a very high centrifugal force towards the outside of the curve, the terms of the lateral
displacements shall be reconsidered.

— The play w shall be taken towards the outside of the curve.

— For the plays (1,465 - d)/2 and q it is necessary to distinguish between bogie vehicles and vehicles with independent

wheels.

Bogie vehicles, calculation of play on the inside of the curve:

On-line tests have shown that for bogie vehicles, some axles run round the curve with the flange in contact with the outer
rail, while others do not maintain this contact constantly. As a result and for safety reasons, the plays mentioned above shall
be taken equal to zero.

Bogie vehicles, calculation of play on the outer side of the curve:

The plays (1,465 - d)/2 and q shall be taken, likewise for reasons of safety, on the outside of the curve.

Vehicles with independent wheels:

The tests have confirmed that the plays (1,465 - d)/2 and q occur towards the outside of the curve.

(1)

For the TBV calculation this term must be measured at the height hc above the running surface of the rail. It can have different values for
a same given vehicle, depending on configuration, according to the tilt technology and possible re-centring of the body.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/205

C.8.3.2.2. Q u a s i - s t a t i c d i s p l a c e m e n t o f a T B V

To obtain the clearances to structures, the Permanent Way Department must add certain terms to the dimension of the
reference profile. The quasi-static displacements of vehicles are calculated with the formula below:

0,4
1,5

½
· EouI − 0,05

ð
(cid:138)>0· h − 0,5

Þ>0

The maximum allowable value for E or I is 200 mm.

Each Infrastructure Manager fixes for its lines its own maximum value for I. The values generally used are between 90 and
180 mm.

Vehicles must not exceed this maximum value of I when running.

On the other hand, TBVs reach higher values. This means that their dimensions need to be checked with a different
calculation for the quasi-static displacements.

Just as for conventional vehicles, the effect of a cant deficiency induces in TBV units a tilting of the body around a
longitudinal axis, a rotation which is due to the flexibility of the suspension system. In the formulae, the quasi-static
displacements corresponding to this rotation are taken into consideration in the term ‘z’. Because TBVs can run with cant
deficiencies of up to Ip it is necessary to revise the calculation of this term (zP).

It is appropriate to introduce this new term zP, the formulation of which takes account of the total quasi-static tilt due to IP,
in relation to that considered by the Permanent Way Department, IC (see paragraphs 3.2.2.1 and 3.2.2.2).

Moreover, for the active tilting systems, it is necessary to consider a supplementary term (see 3.2.3), because the tilting of the
body to compensate for the centrifugal acceleration is independent of the tilt due to the roll.

C.8.3.2.2.1. E x p r e s s i o n o f
t h e i n s i d e o f

t h e q u a s i - s t a t i c d i s p l a c e m e n t s z P f o r
t h e c u r v e

t h e r e d u c t i o n s o n

Under the effect of the lateral acceleration associated with IP values greater than 0, the body of the vehicle, because of the
flexibility of the suspensions, tilts towards the outside of the curve when active tilting is used and towards the inside of the
curve when passive tilting is used. The following figures show this type of displacement from the position I = 0. Due to the
different modes of tilting, with the active system the displacements are largest at the upper part of the vehicle body, whereas
with the passive system they are largest at the lower part of the vehicle body.

Fig. C32:

ACTIVE system

Note: The tilt imparted by the system is not represented here.

— Since the reference profile is considered from the standpoint of the inside of the curve, the points of the vehicle
situated at a height h>hc move away from the profile. The value of this displacement in the calculation will carry a
minus sign.

The opposite is true for points situated at a height h < hc.

L 344/206

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Fig. C33:

PASSIVE system

— Since the reference profile is considered from the standpoint of the inside of the curve, the points of the vehicle
situated at a height h<hc move away from the profile. The value of this displacement in the calculation will have a
minus sign.

— The opposite is true for points situated at a height of h > hc.

The displacements corresponding to different tilts shown in Figures 2a and 2b are indicated below.

For a TBV unit with an active system running on a curve with a cant deficiency IP the quasi-static displacements are:

Zp ¼

S
1,5

ð
·Ip· h − hc

Þ with η0 < 1°

For a TBV unit with a passive system subjected to a cant deficiency IP the quasi-static displacements are:

Zp ¼

S
1,5

·Ip· h − hc
ð

Þ with η0 < 1°

It is necessary to draw attention to the fact that the value of s is specific to the situation calculated and can, therefore, be
influenced by the action of the body tilt system.

C.8.3.2.2.2. E x p r e s s i o n o f

t h e q u a s i - s t a t i c d i s p l a c e m e n t s z P,

f o r

t h e r e d u c t i o n s o n

t h e o u t e r s i d e o f

t h e c u r v e

Under the effect of the lateral acceleration (corresponding to values IP>0) the body of an active TBV unit tilts towards the
outside of the curve because of the flexibility of the suspension system and towards the inside of the curve for a passive TBV
unit.

Similarly to Figures 2a and 2b, the Figures 3a and 3b represent this type of displacement, from the position I = 0.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/207

Fig. C34:

ACTIVE system

Note: The tilt imparted by the system is not represented here.

— Since the reference profile is considered from the standpoint of the outside of the curve, the points of the vehicle
situated at a height h>hc move closer to the profile. The value of this displacement in the calculation will have a plus
sign.

— The opposite is true for the points situated at a height of h < hc.

Fig. C35:

PASSIVE system

— Since the reference profile is considered from the standpoint of the outside of the curve, the points of the vehicle
situated at a height h<hc move closer to the profile. The value of this displacement in the calculation will have a plus
sign.

— The opposite is true for the points situated at a height of h > hc.

L 344/208

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

When the vehicles run in a curve they move closer to the reference profile (on the outer side) in proportion to the value of
IP; if the condition IP >IC, is present, the distances considered by the Permanent Way Department for the positioning of
obstacles will not be sufficient. Since the position of obstacles cannot be questioned, the reductions calculated for vehicles
should, if necessary, be increased by a value corresponding to the difference between the quasi-static displacements due to IP
and those taken into account by the Permanent Way Department or:

Active system

(cid:20)

s
1,5

z ¼

:Ip: h − hc
ð

Þ −

0,4
1,5

: Ic − 0,05
ð

Þ: h − 0,5

ð

Þ>0

(cid:21)

>0

Passive system

(cid:20)

z ¼ −

s
1,5

:Ip h − hc

ð

Þ −

0,4
1,5

: Ic − 0,05
ð

Þ: h − 0,5

ð

Þ>0

(cid:21)

>0

It must be remembered that:

— the formulae apply where IP > IC;

— it will be necessary to find in the application phase corresponding to a real case, the combination of the values for IP

and IC which give a value of zP that maximises the reduction:

— the tilting system of the vehicle must ensure the following for the intermediate values of IP (marked IP'), to which

correspond the intermediate values of cant deficiency Ic':

I

0

p (cid:20)

Ip
Ic

:I

0
c

Furthermore, the conditions given in 5.1 must be met.

C.8.3.2.3. A C T I V E s y s t e m s : d i s p l a c e m e n t s d u e t o b o d y r o t a t i o n

When an active-system TBV runs over a curve at a speed such that IP>0, based on measurement of the value of certain
parameters (speed, cant gradient, curve radius) the tilting system establishes the angle of body tilt β.

The angle β is independent of the tilt due to the flexibility of the suspensions.

Fig. C36

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/209

n Figure 4 the following values are represented:

ho:
β:

height of the centre of rotation of the body imposed by the system.
value of the angle of body tilt, relative to the system bearing plane; this angle imposed by the system is a function of
the cant deficiency IP.

Since angle β can be as great as 10o, the vertical component of the displacement must not be overlooked and it shall be
taken into account in the calculation for real cases.

If only the lateral displacements are considered, approximate values can be found by the following formula:

tan β (h - h0)

This term, in light of the direction of rotation imposed by the system,

— shall carry a positive sign in the calculations on the inside of the curve

— shall carry a minus sign in the calculations on the outside of the curve.

C.8.4.

Associated Rules

— The formulae apply for IP > IC.

— The expression of the term zP shall be detailed and explained, case by case, when the formulae are applied to each type

of system, bearing in mind the different stops, the roll centre, etc.

— It should be stressed that the parameters, s, hc and w, in agreement with the technical principles of the TBV unit, for

any given vehicle have different values depending on the calculation cases involved.

— The maximum values of the reductions shall be calculated depending on the different values likely to be taken by IP, IC
(and by the angle β for active TBVs, see § 3.2.3). For this purpose the TBV Builder should bear in mind the most
prominent places permitted on the bodies when running over different sections of line (straight track, transitions,
curves) and the possible tolerances with respect to the effective position of the vehicle (due to the delay in system
activation, inertia, friction, etc).

— The parts of the TBVs which are not connected to the body and, therefore, do not tilt, always remain subject to a value
of uncompensated acceleration greater than that normally accepted. For these items (such as the bogies and
sometimes the pantograph), a supplementary term taking account of the reduction shall be used when the tilting body
is checked.

This term is of the form:

S
ð
1,5

Ip − Ic

ð
Þ h − hc

Þ

Moreover, no account shall be taken of the term tan β (h - h0) for these parts (see § 3.2.3).

— This Appendix has been developed on the basis of information applicable to the TBV units in service today. Other
hypotheses and modifications to the formulae may be added, in the future, after new types of TBV units have been
developed.

— When the examination of all the cases which were thought to be critical has been completed, a comparison shall be
made between the different permissible half-width dimensions and the smallest value at each of the heights h
considered shall be selected.

C.8.5.

Comments

C.8.5.1.

Condition for adjusting the inclination (TBV units with active system)

For the formulae that have been given in this Appendix for the calculation of the loading gauge of TBV units to be valid it is
necessary that the tilt system guarantees that the body is inclined in a way that is proportional to the variation of the cant
deficiency.

For the passive systems this condition is obviously fulfilled as the tilt of the body is caused by the low cant.

L 344/210

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

For TBV units with an active tilt system on the other hand, the values that the system imposes on the bodies are fixed by the
design or adjustment of the system.

These values shall meet the following conditions in order that the bodies do not exceed the specified profile:

a)

The intermediate values I’P, I’C and E' between 0 and the maximum value of the respective sizes, shall meet, from a
point of view of the regulation of the tilting system, the following condition:

I0
P
IP

¼

I0
C
IC

¼

0

E
E

b)

Moreover in the case of checking on the outside of the curve, in view of the fact that the centrifugal force tilts the body
towards the outside (quasi-static displacement zP), the following condition, regarding the value of β for the adjustment
shall be observed:

tan β (h - h0) ≥ zp

In other words, the effect of the system must be greater than or equal to the quasi-static effect.

C.8.5.2.

Condition concerning the speed of TBV units

For TBVs, it is permissible to calculate a maximum speed from the standpoint of the loading gauge than for other vehicles.

Reference should be made to the expression that relates the cant deficiency to the speed:

IPorC ¼ 0,01186·

V2
PorC
R

− E

The speeds vP and vC are respectively the value taken by the TBV and the corresponding value allowed for the track,
according to the ruling speed for the line.

Thus: VP (cid:20)

r

ﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃ
IP þ E
IC þ E

·VC

From this formula, it is possible to deduce the maximum speed value that must not be exceeded by the TBV, using the
following formula:

VP (cid:20)

r

ﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃ
IP þ E
IC þ E

·VC

C.8.6.

Appendix 4 Rolling Stock Loading Gauge

Use of existing infrastructure clearances by vehicles with predefined parameters

A bilateral agreement shall be required before applying this appendix.

Example:

On straight track in good maintenance condition with the usual defects in track geometry, the decisive criterion shall be the
maximum distance between track centres; this equals the width of the reference profile plus margins for random movements
of the vehicle due to defects in track geometry (D).

q

ﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃ
i þ d2
d2

a

D ¼

q

ﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃ
Σt2

i,a

di,a ¼ 1,2

tiji¼5
i¼1

taja¼5
a¼1

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/211

t1
t2
t3i, a
t4 and t5= impact of load imbalance and of asymmetries

= lateral movement of the track
= impact of a cant or cross-level defect of 0,015 m
= oscillations towards the inside or towards the outside

t1 ¼ 0,025

t2 ¼ 0,15

h
1,5

þ 0,015 h − hC

ð

Þ

S
1,5

t3,i ¼ 0,007 h − hC

ð

Þ

S
1,5

t3,a ¼ 0,039 h − hC

ð

Þ

S
1,5

t4 ¼ 0,05 h − hC

ð

Þ

S
1,5

t5 ¼ 0,015 h − hC

ð

Þ

S
1,5

The following parameters shall be used to determine the margins (clearances) to be added to the G1 reference profile:

h = 3,25 m

hc = 0,5 m

s = 0,4

The predefined parameters of the vehicle under examination can be used, for instance:

h = 1,8 m (height above the running surface of a certain body section)

hc = 0,7 m

s = 0,24

Based on the above parameters, the following values can be obtained:

— for profile G1
— for the vehicle with predefined parameters

D = 0,113 m
D’ = 0,058 m

The difference D - D’ = 0,055 m can be used as a basis for widening a vehicle with predefined parameters.

If the additional clearance covering random movements is not calculated as described, but a flat overall value is defined, and
if this results in smaller dimensions, this should be taken into consideration for the calculation of D-D’.

Example: SNCF, V ≤ 120 km/h: DSNCF = 0,05 + 0,03 = 0,08 m.

The vehicle with predefined parameters could then be widened by 0,022 m at a height of 1,8,m

L 344/212

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

ANNEX D

VEHICLE TRACK INTERACTION AND GAUGING

Static axle load, dynamic wheel load and linear load

D.1 LOAD LIMITS FOR WAGONS ACCORDING TO THE CLASSIFICATION OF LINES.

Diagram of wagons to be considered for determining the line category

a = distance between bogie axles
b = distance from first axle to the end of the nearest buffer
c = distance between the two inside axles

Category

Mass per axle

Mass per unit
length

A

B1

B2

C2

C3

C4

D2

D3

D4

P=16 t

p=5,0 t/m

1,50

1,80

P=18 t

p=5,0 t/m

1,50

1,80

P=18 t

p=6,4 t/m

1,50

1,80

P=20 t

p=6,4 t/m

1,50

1,80

P=20 t

p=7,2 t/m

1,50

1,80

P=20 t

p=8,0 t/m

1,50

1,80

P=22,5 t

p=6,4 t/m

1,50

1,80

P=22,5 t

p=7,2 t/m

1,50

1,80

P=22,5 t

p=8,0 t/m

1,50

1,80

Open for E, F and G lines and for categories 5 and 6

6,20

12,80

7,80

14,40

4,65

11,25

5,90

12,50

4,50

11,10

3,40

10,00

7,45

14,05

5,90

12,50

4,65

11,25

1,80

1,50

1,80

1,50

1,80

1,50

1,80

1,50

1,80

1,50

1,80

1,50

1,80

1,50

1,80

1,50

1,80

1,50

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/213

D.2 LOAD LIMITS FOR WAGONS ACCORDING TO THE CLASSIFICATION OF LINES.

WAGONS WITH TWO 2-AXLE BOGIES
Permissible maximum mass per Pr on the various line categories in relation to the dimensions a and b

Values of the dimensions

Line categories

A

M

1,80

1,70

1,60

1,50

1,40

1,30

b

m

1,50
1,40
1,30
1,20

1,50
1,40
1,30
1,20

1,50
1,40
1,30
1,20

1,50
1,40
1,30
1,20

1,50
1,40
1,30
1,20

1,50
1,40
1,30
1,20

D4 D3 D2

C4 C3 C2

B2 B1

t

22,5
21,5
20,5
20

22
21
20
19,5

21
20
19
18,5

20
19,5
19
18

19
18
18,5
17,5

18,5
18,5
18
17

t

20
19
18,5
18

19,5
19
18
17,5

19
18,5
17,5
17

18,5
18
17,5
17

17
17
16,5
15,5

16,5
16,5
16,5
15,5

T

18
17
16,5
16

17,5
17
16
15,5

17
16,5
15,5
15

16,5
16
15,5
14,5

15,5
15,5
15
14

15
15
14,5
13,5

A

t

16
15
15
14

15,5
15
14
14

15
14,5
14
13,5

14,5
14
13,5
13

13,5
13,5
13
12

13
13
12,5
11,5

IMPORTANT NOTE: The masse per axle shown in the above table are only valid if the wagon length L between buffers is
such that the mass per unit length p falls within the line category under consideration. Otherwise the permissible mass per

axle load is lower and shall be equal to

pL
4

.

Open for E, F and G lines and for categories 5 and 6

L 344/214

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

D.3 LOAD LIMITS FOR WAGONS ACCORDING TO THE CLASSIFICATION OF LINES.

WAGONS WITH TWO 3-AXLE BOGIES
Permissible maximum mass per Pr on the various line categories in relation to the dimensions a and b

Values of dimensions

Line categories

A

M

1,80

1,70

1,60

1,50

1,40

1,30

b

m

1,50
1,40
1,30
1,20

1,50
1,40
1,30
1,20

1,50
1,40
1,30
1,20

1,50
1,40
1,30
1,20

1,50
1,40
1,30
1,20

1,50
1,40
1,30
1,20

D 4

t

18
18
18
18

17,5
17,5
17,5
17,5

17
17
17
17

16,5
16,5
16,5
16,5

15,5
15,5
15,5
15,5

15
15
15
15

D 3

t

18
18
17,5
17

17,5
17,5
17
16,5

17
17
16,5
16

16,5
16,5
16,5
16

15,5
15,5
15,5
15,5

15
15
15
15

D 2

t

18
17,5
17
16

17,5
17
16
16

17
16
16
15,5

16
16
15,5
15,5

15,5
15,5
15,5
15,5

15
15
15
15

C 4

t

16,5
16
16
16

16
15,5
15,5
15,5

15,5
15
15
15

15
14,5
14,5
14,5

14
14
14
14

13,5
13,5
13,5
13,5

C 3

t

16,5
16
16
16

16
15,5
15,5
15,5

15,5
15
15
15

15
14,5
14,5
14,5

14
14
14
14

13,5
13,5
13,5
13,5

C 2

t

16,5
16
15,5
15

16
15,5
15
14,5

15,5
15
14,5
14

15
14,5
14,5
14

14
14
14
14

13,5
13,5
13,5
13,5

B 2

T

15
14,5
14,5
14,5

14,5
14
14
14

14
13,5
13,5
13,5

13,5
13
13
13

12,5
12,5
12,5
12,5

12
12
12
12

B 1

t

14,5
14
13,5
13

14
13,5
13
13

13,5
13
13
12,5

13
13
12,5
12,5

12,5
12,5
12,5
12,5

12
12
12
12

A

t

13
12,5
12
12

12,5
12
12
12

12
12
11,5
11,5

12
11,5
11,5
11,5

11,5
11,5
11,5
11,5

11
11
11
11

IMPORTANT NOTE : The masses per axle shown in the above table are only valid:

1)

if the dimension c is > 2b. Otherwise the dimension b shall not be taken as the value of b, but the value

nearest value below shown in the table;

c
2

or the

2)

if the wagon length L between buffers is such that the mass per unit length p falls within the line category under

consideration. Otherwise the permissible mass per axle is lower and shall be equal to

pL
.
6

Open for E, F and G lines and for categories 5 and 6

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/215

D.4 LOAD LIMITS FOR WAGONS ACCORDING TO THE CLASSIFICATION OF LINES.

WAGONS WITH TWO 4-AXLE BOGIES
Permissible maximum mass per axle Pr on the various line categories in relation to the dimensions a and b

Values of dimensions

Line categories

A

M

1,80

1,70

1,60

1,50

1,40

1,30

b

m

1,50
1,40
1,30
1,20

1,50
1,40
1,30
1,20

1,50
1,40
1,30
1,20

1,50
1,40
1,30
1,20

1,50
1,40
1,30
1,20

1,50
1,40
1,30
1,20

D 4

t

17,5
17
17
16,5

17,5
17
16,5
15,5

16,5
16
15,5
15

16
15,5
15
15

15
15
15
14,5

14,5
14,5
14,5
14

D 3

t

16,5
16,5
16
15

16
16
15
15

15,5
15
14,5
14,5

15
14,5
14
14

14,5
14
13,5
13

14
13,5
13
13

D 2

t

15,5
15
15
14,5

15
15
14,5
14

15
14,5
14
14

14,5
14
13
13

13
13
12,5
12,5

13
13
12,5
12,5

C 4

t

16
16
16
16

15,5
15,5
15,5
15,5

15
15
14,5
14,5

14,5
14,5
14
14

13
13
13
13

12,5
12,5
12,5
12,5

C 3

t

16
15,5
15
15

15,5
15
14,5
14,5

15
14,5
14
14

14,5
14
13,5
13

13
13
13
12,5

12,5
12,5
12,5
12

C 2

t

15
14,5
14
13,5

14,5
14
13,5
13,5

14
13,5
13
13

13,5
13
12,5
12,5

13
12,5
12
11,5

12,5
12
11,5
11,5

B 2

T

14,5
13,5
13,5
13

14
13,5
13
12,5

13,5
13
12,5
12

13
12,5
12
12

12
12
12
11,5

11,5
11,5
11,5
11

B 1

t

13
12,5
12
11,5

12,5
12
11,5
11

12
11,5
11
11

11,5
11
10,5
10,5

10,5
10,5
10
10

10,5
10,5
10
10

A

t

11,5
11
10,5
10,5

11
10,5
10,5
10

10,5
10
10
10

10,5
10
9,5
9,5

10
10
9,5
9,5

9,5
9,5
9
9

IMPORTANT NOTE : The masses per axle shown in the above table are only valid:

1)

if the dimension c is > 2b. Otherwise the dimension b shall not be taken as the value of b, but the value
nearest value below shown in the table (1);

c
2

or the

2)

if the wagon length L between buffers is such that the mass per unit length p falls within the line category under

consideration. Otherwise the permissible mass per axle is lower and shall be equal to

pL
.
8

Open for E, F and G lines and for categories 5 and 6

(1)

If

c
2

< 1,20 m, a special study is required.

L 344/216

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

D.5 LOAD LIMITS FOR WAGONS ACCORDING TO THE CLASSIFICATION OF LINES.

WAGONS WITH 3 OR 4 BOGIES, EACH WITH 2 AXLES
Permissible maximum mass per axle Pr on the various line categories in relation to the dimensions a, b and c

D.5.1 Wagons with three 2-axle bogies

If c ≥ 2b: the values given in D..2 shall be taken

If c < 2b: the values given in D..2 shall be taken and the dimension b shall not be taken as the value of b, but the value
the nearest value below appearing in the table (1).

D.5.2 Wagons with four 2-axle bogies

If 2,40 ≤ c < 2b: the values given in D..2 shall be taken and the dimension b shall not be taken as the value of b, but the

the nearest value below appearing in D.2.

c
or
2

c
or
2

If c < 2,40 m: the values given in D.4 shall be taken and the lesser of the dimensions a or c shall be taken as the value of a.

IMPORTANT NOTE : The masses per axle shown in the above table are only valid if the wagon length L between buffers is
such that the mass per unit length p falls within the line category under consideration. Otherwise the permissible mass per
axle is equal to:

pLc
6

for wagons with three 2-axle bogies,

pL
8

for wagons with four 2-axle bogies.

Open for E, F and G lines and for categories 5 and 6

(1)

If

c
2

< 1,20 m, a special study is required.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/217

D.6 LOAD LIMITS FOR WAGONS ACCORDING TO THE CLASSIFICATION OF LINES.

LOAD LIMITS FOR TWO-AXLE WAGONS

The table below gives the results of the comparisons in relation to the length over buffers L for wagons in common use, i.e.
for maximum axle loads of 22,5, 20, 18 and 16 t.

When however, as stated in this leaflet, extra restrictions are required because of specific characteristics of the wagon or the
load or as a result of fast forwarding conditions, the stricter values should be applied instead of those shown in the table
below.

Load limits for two-axle wagons

Wagon characteristics

L (m)

L>7,20

A

32-T

32-T

32-T

P (t)

22,5

20

18

16

Line categories

B1

B2

36-T

36-T

C

40-T

D

45-T

40-T

36-T

32-T

Open for E, F and G lines and for categories 5 and 6

Note: Requirements for wagons with length lower than 7.2 m are deleted because these wagons are not still bild.

D.7 LOAD LIMITS FOR WAGONS ACCORDING TO THE CLASSIFICATION OF LINES.

LOAD LIMITS FOR WAGONS WITH TWO 2-AXLE BOGIES

The table below gives the results of the comparisons in relation to the length over buffers L for wagons in common use, i.e.
for maximum axle loads of 22,5, 20, 18 and 16 t.

When however, as stated in this leaflet, extra restrictions are required because of specific characteristics of the wagon or the
load or as a result of fast forwarding conditions, the stricter values should be applied instead of those shown in the table
below.

Load limits for wagons with two 2-axle bogies

Wagon characteristics

Line categories

L

P

A

B1

B2

C2

C3

C4

D2

D3

D4

L>14,40

22,5

64-T

64-T

64-T

20

18

16

72-T

72-T

80-T

90-T

80-T

72-T

14,06<L<14,40

22,5

64-T

5L-T

72-T

64-T

5L-T

72-T

64-T

5L-T

20

18

16

12,80<L<14,06

22,5

64-T

5L-T

72-T

64-T

5L-T

72-T

64-T

5L-T

20

18

16

64-T

80-T

64-T

80-T

64-T

90-T

80-T

72-T

6,4L-T

90-T

80-T

72-T

L 344/218

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Wagon characteristics

L

P

A

B1

B2

C2

12,50<L<12,80

22,5

5L-T

5L-T

72-T

Line categories

C3

80-T

C4

D2

D3

D4

6,4L-T

90-T

72-T

80-T

20

18

16

5L-T

5L-T

5L-T

5L-T

5L-T

5L-T

11,25<L<12,50

22,5

5L-T

5L-T

72-T

6,4L-T

72-T

6,4L-T

20

18

16

5L-T

5L-T

5L-T

5L-T

5L-T

5L-T

11,10<L<11,25

22,5

5L-T

5L-T

20

18

16

5L-T

5L-T

5L-T

5L-T

5L-T

5L-T

6,4L-T

6,4L-T

6,4L-T

72-T

64-T

72-T

64-T

64-T

80-T

80-T

80-T

80-T

72-T

6,4L-T

7,2L-T

90-T

6,4L-T

80-T

6,4L-T

7,2L-T

8L-T

6,4L-T

6,4L-T

80-T

72-T

Wagon characteristics

Line categories

L

P

A

B1

B2

C2

C3

C4

D2

D3

D4

10,00<L<11.10

22,5

5L-T

5L-T

20

18

16

5L-T

5L-T

5L-T

5L-T

5L-T

5L-T

6,4L-T

6,4L-T

6,4L-T

7,2L-T

80-T

6,4L-T

7,2L-T

8L-T

7,2L-T

80-T

6,4L-T

7,2L-T

80-T

72-T

6,4L-T

72-T

64-T

NOTE: Bogie wagons with a length over buffers of less than 10 m do not exist in practice and are therefore not taken into
account.

Open for E and F lines and for categories 5 and 6

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/219

ANNEX E

VEHICLE TRACK INTERACTION AND GAUGING

Wheelset dimensions and tolerances for standard gauge

Table E1

Designation

Wheel diameter (mm)

Minimum value (mm)

Maximum value (mm)

Distance between flange contact faces
(SR)
SR = AR+Sd(left wheel)+Sd(right wheel)

Back to back distance (AR)

Width of the rim (BR)

Thickness of the flange (Sd)

≥ 840

< 840 and ≥ 330

≥ 840

< 840 and ≥ 330

≥ 330

≥ 840

< 840 and ≥ 330

≥ 760

Height of the flange (Sh)

< 760 and ≥ 630

< 630 and ≥ 330

Face of flange (qR)

≥ 330

1 410

1 415

1 357

1 359

133

22

27,5

28

30

32

6.5

1 426

1 426

1 363

1 363

140 (1)

33

33

36

36

36

Wheel tread defects, e.g. wheel flats, shelled
treads, cracks, grooves, cavities etc

(1)

Burr value included

National rules apply until EN is published

The dimensions SR and AR are measured at the top surface of the rail, and shall be complied with for freight wagons in laden
and tare conditions and for loose wheelsets. For specific vehicles smaller tolerances within the above limits may be specified
by the vehicle supplier.

L 344/220

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Fig. E1 — Symbols

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/221

ANNEX F

COMMUNICATION

Vehicle capability to transmit information between ground and vehicle

Fig. F1

Tag position on wagon.

In the Fig. F1 (above), A1 and A2 are respectively the minimum and maximum height above rail for positioning the centres
of the tags in all conditions of wagon loading and suspension movement:

A1 = 500 mm

A2 = 1100 mm

Fig. F2

Installation constraints for tag readers

L 344/222

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

ANNEX G

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS

Humidity

Fig. G1

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/223

Fig G2

L 344/224

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

ANNEX H

INFRASTRUCTURE AND ROLLING STOCK REGISTER

Rolling Stock register

Requirements for the Freight Wagon Register

Data Item

Interoperability Critical

Safety Critical

Frequency of update

Basic Data

Vehicle number

Owner

Keeper

Vehicle type
(UIC 438-2}

Technical Information

Length over buffers

Tare weight

Coupling type

Vehicle gauge

Wheelset gauge

Wheel diameter

No. of axles and arrangement

Position of wheelsets/inner wheelset distance/
pivot pitch

Bogie pitch (wheel base of the bogie)

Safety critical Information

Braking type

Brake weight/braked weight %

Deceleration curve

Hand brake type

Maximum speed (loaded)

Maximum speed (empty)

Maximum load

Maximum axle load

Dangerous goods information (several fields)

Information required for vehicle loading

Loading table

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Annually

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/225

Data Item

Interoperability Critical

Safety Critical

Frequency of update

Height of loading platform (for flat wagons and
combined transport)

Loading restrictions (e.g. Weight distribution)

Registration Data

State of registration

Date of putting into service

Date of declaration of EC verification and
Notified Body
List of
Interoperable Constituents fitted to
wagon, IC identification and IC EC verification
and date of declaration of EC verification, and
Notified Bodies.

Additional certification required for specific
cases

All previous vehicle numbers and correspond-
ing registration dates

Maintenance Information

Maintenance plan reference

Restrictions

Geographical limitations

Environmental
range T(n), T(s), T(RIV),
T(n)+T(s)

limitations — temperature

Hump shunting restriction

Minimum curve radius

Vertical curve restrictions

Ferry use permitted

Timescale restrictions

Tags

If fitted

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

(√)

(√)

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

Note : A separate database(s) of keepers/owners/RUs will be required, identified from the R S Register by code nos.

L 344/226

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

ANNEX I

INTERFACES OF BRAKING INTEROPERABILITY CONSTITUENTS

I.1. DISTRIBUTOR

The specification of the interoperability constituent distributor is described in 4.2.4.1.2.2 Braking Power and
4.2.4.1.2.7 Air Supply

I.1.1. Distributor Interfaces

I.1.1.1. Distributor valve

A distributor is a pneumatic control valve. Its function is to control its output pressure as an inverse function of the
variation of its input pressure. See Figs. I.1 and I.2. The performance of a distributor is specified by the following:

— Graduable application and release of the brakes

— Brake Application Time

— Brake Release Time

— Manual Distributor Release Valve

— Automatic operation

— Sensitivity and Insensitivity

Fig.: I.1

Fig.: I.2

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/227

The distributor is controlled by the pressure in the brake pipe. The normal operating pressure of the brake pipe in a train
shall be 5 bar with the Driver's Brake Controller in the ‘Release’ position; however, the distributor shall function normally
with a brake pipe pressure of 4 to 6 bar. The pressure drop in the brake pipe to obtain a full application must be 1,5 bar ±
0,1. The maximum output pressure obtained with this drop is 3,8 bar ± 0,1. The output pressure usually is limited to a
maximum value. The normal operating pressure of the brake pipe is 5 bar, but the distributor must be able to operate
normally with a brake pipe between 4 and 6 bar. The rate of change of the distributor output pressure shall be determined
by the rate of change of the input pressure. (See Fig. I.3).

Fig.: I.3

The distributor shall cause the brakes on a wagon to release by venting the brake cylinder pipe to atmosphere in response to
an increase in brake pipe pressure following a brake application, see Fig. I.4.

Fig.: I.4

It shall be possible to make small applications and releases of the output pressure by varying the input pressure and a change
of 0,1 bar on the input will cause a change in the output. The variation in output pressure with the same input pressure shall
not vary more than 0,1 bar between an application and release.

The distributor shall not connect the brake pipe and reference control reservoir until the output pressure is less than 0,3 bar.
This connection shall be allowed when the brake pipe has risen to within 0,15 bar of the operating pressure.

The Brake Application Time is the time for increasing output pressure from when it starts to rise from 0 bar up to 95 % of
the maximum output pressure when input pressure is reduced to 0 bar in less than 2 seconds. This is 3 to 5 seconds in ‘P’
single stage, or 3 to 6 seconds in ‘P’ with a load/empty or load proportional brake, and 18 to 30 seconds in ‘G’ in a single-
pipe operation.

L 344/228

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

The Release Time is the time for reducing the output pressure from when it starts to fall from maximum down to 0,4 bar
when input pressure is increased up to the operating pressure starting from 1,5 bar below it, in less than 2 seconds. This is
15 to 20 seconds in ‘P’ and 45 to 60 seconds in ‘G’. For freight wagons with a total weight higher than 70 tonnes the time in
‘P’ can be 15 to 25 seconds.

The distributor shall be able to be utilised either as ‘G’, ‘P’ or ‘G/P’ or in the latter case there will be a changeover device
allowing the change over between the timings.

There shall be a Manual Release Function, which requires deliberate and intentional manual action in order to cancel the
brake application (to release the distributor valve).

The distributor must be Automatic and have the ability to ensure the maximum output pressure in case of loss of input
pressure.

The distributor must be inexhaustible and have the capability to give at least 85 % of the maximum output pressure, by an
emergency application, under all operating conditions. The distributor shall maintain the output pressure compensating for
leakage in the output volumes whilst there is air in the auxiliary reservoir.

The filling of the auxiliary and control reservoirs on one vehicle shall be such that the release and filling of the reservoirs at
the rear of the train are not impeded. It must also be such that there are not significant variations in the brake pipe pressure
likely to cause operation of the brakes on the neighbouring vehicles.

The distributor must operate normally in response to the input pressure when adjacent distributors are isolated or not
functioning.

The Sensitivity of the distributor will be such that it will come into operation within 1,2 seconds with an input pressure
reduction of 0,6 bar in 6 seconds from the normal operating pressure.

The Insensitivity of the distributor is such that it will not come into operation with an input reduction from the normal
operating pressure of 0,3 bar in 60 seconds.

Fig.: I.5

There shall be a Quick Service Function (accelerator) in a distributor valve which allows, when first applying the brake from
the released position, the local fast venting of brake pipe pressure by a maximum of 0,4 bar when the brake pipe pressure at
the front of the train falls by 0,3 bar. This is to provide pneumatic brake signal transmission through a train.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/229

There can be an Operating pressure overcharge which allows a build up of brake pipe pressure above normal operating
pressure to 6 bar to reduce the release time and this can be present for up to 40 seconds in ‘G’ mode and 10 seconds in ‘P’
mode. The distributor shall not overcharge the control reservoir during this brake pipe overcharge period. After a full release
of the brakes the distributor shall not operate when the brake pipe pressure is raised to 6 bar for 2 seconds, then reduced to
5,2 bar in 1 second followed by a return to normal operating pressure.

The distributor shall have an Inshot function, which allows, when operated in the braking mode ‘G’, a faster increase of the
output pressure at the beginning of brake application. This will be about 10 % of the maximum output pressure. The
purpose is quick build up of the necessary pressure for initiating the friction braking process.

Fig.: I.6

I.2. RELAY VALVE FOR VARIABLE LOAD/AUTOMATIC EMPTY-LOAD CHANGE OVER BRAKE

I.2.1. Relay valve for variable load

A relay valve is a device that varies the application force of the brake system according to the mass of the wagon. Changes in
the mass of the wagon shall automatically and continuously cause the brake force to be varied without significant delay. It
shall not react to short shocks or short variations of the load at the wheels. It shall not alter the performance characteristics
of the air-brake (see TSI, ch. 5.3.3.1) except in the case of brakes with pneumatically-controlled devices for the variation of
the braking power, the release time is the time which must elapse before a pressure of 0,4 bar is seen in the relay control
chamber (pilot pressure). During braking, the established brake force due to a brake demand shall not be changed by this
device. It shall provide a minimum of 5 steps of brake in the service range between minimum and maximum brake force in
all cases from an empty to a loaded wagon. Any air consumption of this device shall be as low as possible and not have any
effect on the braking of the vehicle.

I.2.2. Relay valve for automatic empty/load change over

An Empty/Load relay valve is a device that varies the application force of the brake system at a single point in the mass range
of a wagon. The empty or loaded position of this relay valve shall be automatically obtained when the mass of the wagon
becomes respectively lower or higher than the changeover mass. Its performance shall not be affected by shocks and
vibrations. A relay valve for empty/load must not alter the performance characteristics of the air brake (see TSI, ch. 5.3.3.1).

I.3. WHEEL SLIDE PROTECTION DEVICE

A Wheel slide protection (WSP) device is part of a system designed to make the best use of available adhesion by a controlled
reduction and restoration of the brake force to prevent wheel sets from locking and uncontrolled sliding, thereby optimising
stopping distance. The WSP device shall not alter the functional characteristics of the brakes.

The speed of rotation of the wheelsets is calculated on the basis of information provided by sensors, and monitored by an
automatic control system. These transmit commands to the WSP dump valves to reduce or restore braking power, either
totally or partially.

L 344/230

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

The system shall take permitted wheel diameter differences on a given vehicle into account when evaluating speed.

The power supply to the WSP shall be so designed to ensure that the WSP powers up and that power is available when the
vehicle is set in motion. WSP systems require a power supply to function and this can be provided by the vehicles or by the
WSP itself.

WSP systems shall be designed to function correctly allowing for fluctuations in voltage of ± 30 %. If the voltage fluctuation
exceeds this limit, the WSP shall shut down without disturbing the braking system. As soon as the supply voltage reverts to
the permitted range, the WSP shall automatically return to normal functioning.

The WSP installation shall have its own protected circuit. Fuses or circuit breakers for the WSP shall be separated from
others on the vehicle such that they cannot be confused with or operated in the same manner. Whenever there is power
available, the WSP shall be supplied. Automatic cut-off of the supply is only permissible in the case of sleep-mode (no
movement) or battery protection for battery safety reasons (degraded battery situation or low voltage caused by long-term
lack of supply).

The WSP shall be designed to minimise air consumption.

Further specification of the interoperability constituent, wheel slide protection device, is described in 4.2.4.1.2.6 and
4.2.4.1.2.7 within the TSI.

I.4.

SLACK ADJUSTER

Slack adjusters are necessary to automatically maintain a nominally constant clearance between the friction pair (wheel and
brake block or disc and brake pad) in order to maintain the braking characteristics and guarantee the braking performance.

The slack adjuster shall not absorb more than 2 kN of the brake application force. The performance characteristics of the
slack adjuster shall not be varied by environmental conditions (vibrations, winter conditions, etc.).

There is no requirement for interchangeability of slack adjuster, but if they are to be interchangeable the following space
envelopes apply (only the values in the table are necessary).

Interchangeable Slack adjusters which are placed within the underframe shall not exceed the following space envelope :

— for loads up to a maximum of 75 kN.

Fig.: I.7

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/231

— for loads greater than 75 kN.

Fig.: I.8

L 344/232

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

I.5.

BRAKE CYLINDER/ACTUATOR

There is no requirement for interchangeability of brake cylinders/actuators, but if they are to be interchangeable the
following clause applies (only the values in the table are necessary).

Interchangeable brake cylinders for use with a tread brake, that are placed in the underframe or in a bogie have to have the
following connecting dimensions in figure I.9.1:

Fig.: I.9.1

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/233

The diameters of the pins and bushes of the articulated joints of the interchangeable brake cylinders shall conform to the
following figure I.9.2.

Fig.: I.9.2

L 344/234

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

I.6.

PNEUMATIC HALF COUPLING

The pneumatic half couplings for the automatic air brake pipe shall conform to Figs. I.10, I.12 and either I.13 or I.15. The
nipple to connect to the end cock shall be as shown in Fig. I.10 and have a truncated internal Whitworth (BSPP) G 1 1/4”
pipe thread.

The pneumatic half couplings for the main reservoir pipe shall conform to Figs. I.11, I.14 and either I.13 or I.15. The nipple
to connect to the end cock shall be as shown in Fig. I.10 (and is the same as for the automatic air brake pipe) and have a
truncated internal Whitworth (BSPP) G 1 1/4” pipe thread.

The internal diameter of the coupling hoses for both pipes shall be between 25 and 30 mm. The length shall be as shown in
Figs. I.10 & I.11. The length of these hoses when used with a swing head autocoupler shall be increased to 1080 mm for the
automatic air brake pipe and 930 mm for the main reservoir pipe instead of the dimensions shown in I.10 & I.11. Rubber
hoses will generally be used for these couplings, but metallic hoses may be used if they are flexible enough.

The coupling heads for the automatic air brake pipe shall conform to Fig. I.12. The coupling head for the main reservoir pipe
shall conform to Fig. I.13. Both Figs. show the mandatory dimensions to ensure coupling, but the shape and the other
dimensions are able to be varied provided the heads are designed to offer the least possible resistance to air flow. The
coupling heads can be made as a single piece or two pieces as shown by the * in Figs. I.12 & I.14. If the coupling head is
made in a single piece the seal shown in I.13 shall be used, otherwise the seal shown in Fig. I.15 shall be used.

Fig. I.10

Fig. I.11

Pneumatic half coupling — Main Reservoir Pipe

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/235

Fig. I.12

Coupling Head — Brake Pipe

Fig. I.13

Seal — Single piece coupling head

L 344/236

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Fig. I.14

Coupling Head — Main Reservoir Pipe

Fig. I.15

Seal — Two piece coupling head

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/237

I.7.

END COCK

An End Cock is a device mounted in a pipe that will allow airflow through the pipe when the end cock is in the open
position. When moved to the closed position it will prevent flow through the pipe and will vent the pipe on one side on the
end cock.

The following functional requirements are defined for the End Cock to ensure the airflow through the brake pipe and main
reservoir pipe. The overall dimensions of the end cocks shall comply with Figs. I.17 & I.18 or I.19 & I.20 depending on the
application on a vehicle with out or with an automatic coupler.

Open and Closed positions : The handle position shall be the same on any vehicle, so the opening and closing of the cock
shall be achieved by turning its spindle through a minimum of 90o and not more than 100o, although a rotation angle of
125o is permissible for cocks to be fitted to wagons without automatic couplers. Stops shall be provided at the extremes of
rotation, so that the open and closed positions are achieved positively. The closed position is where the flow path between
inlet and outlet ports is closed and the venting passage is open and connected to the pipe on the hose and coupling side of
the cock. The cock handle is closed in the vertically upward position on the vehicle. The open position is where the flow
path between inlet and outlet ports is fully open, and the venting passage is closed. The cock handle is open in the
approximately horizontal position.

Where a control shaft is used to operate the end cock it must be possible for the plug to be fitted with a forked lever in such
a way that the rotation angle between the extreme conditions of the cock be symmetrical in relation to the perpendicular
line to the longitudinal centre line of the cock (see Fig. I.20).

Venting port : The end cock shall incorporate a venting port with a minimum area of 80 mm2, arranged so that when the
cock is closed the compressed air from the coupling hose end of the cock (intake connection to vehicle) can be exhausted to
atmosphere. Venting shall have commenced when the operation of the end cock has reduced the cross-sectional area of the
bore of the end cock by one third. The venting port shall not be able to be obstructed when the cock is mounted on the end
vehicle.

Torque: All end cocks with mechanical detent, or with latch engaged shall not be operated by vibration or shocks. The end
cock shall be able to be manually operated so the torque shall reach a value in the range of 9 Nm to 20 Nm for end cocks
with detent and a maximum of 6 Nm for cocks with latch.

Spindle handle of the end cock : Where the handle is detachable and the unique angular relationship between it and the
spindle is not construction ally assured, it shall not be possible to assemble the handle to the spindle except where the axis of
the handle and the diametrical spindle mark are aligned and the spindle shall be marked in accordance with Fig. I.16 or as
otherwise specified by the purchaser. The relative position of the handle and spindle when assembled, shall remain under all
conditions of operation and environment. If the handle of the end cock is detachable from the spindle it shall be positively
located.

Fig. I.16

Marking on end of the spindle

Fall time : The air passages shall be designed to minimise the losses within the cock and the cross-sectional area shall not be
smaller than the cross-sectional area of a plain pipe of 25 mm internal diameter. The fall time in pressure on opening the
end cock should not be longer than that for an equivalent pipe of the same nominal diameter.

Pneumatic shocks: The components shall be able to resist the pneumatic shocks to which the cock is subject when opening
quickly.

L 344/238

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Connections: The body of the end cock shall have an internal Whitworth (BSPP) G1” or G1.1/4” thread, for connection to
the brake or main reservoir pipe. The end of the body adjacent to the internal threads shall be of hexagonal form or have
flats (see Fig. I.17). If required by the Purchaser, the body end can have a flat sealing face for Flange type of connections. The
body of the end cock shall have an external thread for connection to the coupling hose in accordance with Fig. I.18.

Fig. I.17

Diagram showing the overall dimensions of the end cock

(Dimensional length unit is millimetre)

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/239

Fig. I.18

End cock fitted with a spring locking device in the end positions

(Dimensional length unit is millimetre)

L 344/240

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Fig. I.19

Diagram showing the overall dimensions of the end cock on vehicles fitted with automatic couplers

(Dimensional length unit is millimetre)

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/241

Fig. I.20

Connection dimensions for the end cock controls on vehicles equipped with automatic coupler

(Dimensional length unit is millimetre)

I.8.

ISOLATING DEVICE FOR DISTRIBUTOR

The handle of the isolating device must be in a vertical downward position when the brake is in use. Rotating the handle
through a maximum angle of 90o shall isolate the brake. The cock handle shape shall conform to Fig. I.21

Fig. I.21

The isolating device shall be fitted to the vehicle in such a way that the isolated (closed) and active (open) positions are
clearly visible and the device can be easily operated from one side of the vehicle.

It is recommended that the cock be fitted on the distributor or in close proximity to it.

L 344/242

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

I.9.

BRAKE PAD

I.9.1. Purpose

The pad is to be used as part of the friction brake of a vehicle, which is capable of providing pre-defined retardation levels as
specified by the purchaser, by being applied to a brake disc friction face. The pad shall fulfil the following requirements:

— Permit a braking moment or torque to be generated

— Permit, by frictional engagement with a brake disc friction face, the conversion into heat of the kinetic and potential

energy involved in retarding the vehicle or vehicles, which is attributed to the use of the disc brake.

— Act as part of a holding or parking brake by frictional engagement with a brake disc friction face.

I.9.2. Operational

The design and manufacture of the pad shall, for all intended operating conditions, take into account the following criteria.

Performance

— The maximum specified retardation to be achieved in full service and emergency braking conditions

— The rotational speed range of the brake disc

— The specified requirements for any holding or parking brake facility.

— The range of specific pressure of the pad friction surface on the disc friction face

— The type of material used in the manufacture of the brake disc friction face.

— The quantity of brake energy to be converted and its rate of conversion and dissipation

— The temperature of the brake disc friction face

Service and life cycle costs

— The integrity and wear rate of the pad friction material and brake disc friction face

— The need to prevent the detachment of any part of the friction material from the pad throughout its useable thickness.

— The need to prevent deformation of the pad backplane in any plane throughout the useable thickness of the friction

material.

I.9.3. Pad design

The interface dimensions for the Interoperability Constituent brake pad shall conform to figures I.9.3.1 and I.9.3.2 for 200
cm2 and 175 cm2 brake pads.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/243

Figure 9.3.1

L 344/244

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Figure 9.3.2

I.9.4. Frictional Performance

General requirements

Pads of the same size, with the same nominal friction coefficient and used in the same application, may produce different
frictional characteristics depending on the pad material type and formulation.

As far as possible, the friction coefficient must be independent of the initial braking speed, the specific pressure on the brake
disc friction face, the temperature of the friction face and atmospheric conditions. The friction coefficient should also be
independent of the degree of bedding of the pad friction surface on the brake disc friction face

Specific requirements

The purchaser shall supply details of the range of duty level (maximum speed/braked load per disc/deceleration/disc type and
material/any other specific requirements) that the pad should be capable of meeting.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/245

I.10. BRAKE BLOCKS

I.10.1. Purpose

The block is to be used as part of the friction brake of a vehicle, which is capable of providing pre-defined retardation levels
as specified by the purchaser, by being applied to the tread of the wheel. The block shall fulfil the following requirements:

— Permit a braking moment or torque to be generated

— Permit, by frictional engagement with the wheel tread, the conversion into heat of the kinetic and potential energy

involved in retarding the vehicle, or vehicles, which is attributed to the use of the tread brake.

— Act as part of a holding or parking brake by frictional engagement with the wheel tread.

I.10.2. Materials

The brake block, in the case of maintenance related replacement only, can be manufactured in cast iron, composite or
sintered material. For sintered blocks, as far as possible, the friction coefficient must be independent of the initial braking
speed, the specific pressure on the wheel tread, the temperature of the friction face and atmospheric conditions. The friction
coefficient should also be independent of the degree of bedding of the block friction surface on the wheel tread.

This Annex does not provide any specification related to composite blocks.

I.10.3. Interface with Block Holder

The interface dimensions for the single block and double block format, and the key to secure them shall conform to Fig
I.10.3.1 for cast iron blocks 320 mm long and Fig I.10.3.2 for double blocks 250 mm long. Fig I.10.3.3 shows the special
features to be observed in order to ensure interchangeability of composite blocks of
the same type and non-
interchangeability with cast iron blocks for blocks 320 mm long. Fig I.10.3.4 shows the equivalent features for double
composite blocks 250 mm long.

See figures below

L 344/246

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Fig I.10.3.1

Part 1

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/247

Fig I.10.3.1

Part 2

L 344/248

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Fig I.10.3.2

part 1

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/249

Fig I.10.3.2

part 2

L 344/250

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Fig I.10.3.3

All other dimensions as Fig I.10.3.1

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/251

Fig I.10.3.4

All other dimensions as Fig I.10.3.2

I.11. BRAKE PIPE EMPTYING ACCELERATOR VALVE

A brake pipe emptying accelerator valve is a device connected to the brake pipe of a vehicle, which operates in response to
seeing a rapid fall in brake pipe pressure to ensure a continuing rapid fall to below 2.5 bar.

Brake pipe emptying accelerators shall be able to operate with all interoperable distributors and existing interoperable brake
pipe emptying accelerators. The brake pipe-emptying accelerator shall be ready to operate when the brake pipe has reached
its operating (running) pressure. The following operating conditions are defined in relation to a 5 bar brake pipe operating
(running) pressure, but no functional errors shall occur in the operation of brake pipe emptying accelerator at operating
(running) pressures of between 4 and 6 bar.

When an emergency brake application occurs, the brake pipe emptying accelerators shall create a sufficiently rapid reduction
in brake pipe pressure to ensure the rapid increase in brake cylinder pressure on every vehicle in the train set. When the
pressure in the brake pipe has fallen quickly to below 2.5 bar, and within no more than 4 seconds after the accelerator
commences operation, the accelerator shall stop venting air in such a way that the brake pipe can rapidly be refilled.

L 344/252

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

The brake pipe-emptying accelerator shall exhaust the air from the brake pipe without causing any adverse effect on vehicle/
train behaviour.

The brake pipe emptying accelerator shall not come into operation due to the effect of an operating pressure overcharge,
which allows a build up of brake pipe pressure above normal operating pressure to 6 bar and this can be present for up to
40 seconds in ‘G’ mode and 10 seconds in ‘P’ mode. The brake pipe emptying accelerator shall not come into operation after
a full release if the brake pipe is raised to 6 bar for 2 seconds and reducing it to 5.2 bar in 1 second followed by a return to
normal operating pressure.

The operation of the brake pipe-emptying accelerator shall not be affected by an individual vehicle, where a brake pipe
emptying accelerator is not fitted or the brake has been isolated. This shall apply irrespective of the position of that vehicle
and of the train consist.

The brake pipe emptying accelerator shall not come into operation when an emergency brake application is made after a full
service brake application.

The brake pipe emptying accelerator shall come into operation no later than 2 seconds after the pressure in the brake pipe
has fallen from 5 to 3.2 bar within 3 seconds.

The brake pipe emptying accelerator shall not come into operation when the pressure in the brake pipe falls uniformly from
5 to 3.2 bar over 6 seconds with the brake inoperative. When the brake is operative the brake pipe is to fall at the same rate
(5 to 3.2 bar over 6 seconds), but down to 2.5 bar without the brake pipe emptying accelerator operating.

The brake pipe emptying accelerator shall not operate during the initial stage of service braking due to operation of the
internal distributor accelerator valve. This test is carried out on a test rig giving the brake pipe fall as shown on Fig. I.22. The
test rig shall drop the brake pipe from 5 to 4.5 bar within 1 second, with the initial rate of 2 bar/second from 5 to 4.7 bar.
The brake pipe emptying accelerator shall not come into operation during this test.

If the brake pipe emptying accelerator is incorporated in the distributor, it must be inoperative after the brake has been
isolated.

Fig. I.22

Insensitivity test conditions

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/253

I.12. AUTOMATIC LOAD SENSING & EMPTY/LOAD CHANGEOVER DEVICE

I.12.1. Continuous Load Sensing Device

The transmission of the variation in load to the braking control system (variable load relay) can be purely mechanical or
pneumatic. The method of producing the pneumatic signal can be a mechanically operated pneumatic device, a hydraulic to
pneumatic converter device or an elastomeric to pneumatic converter device. The maximum control pressure produced by
any pneumatic system when the wagon is fully loaded shall not exceed 4.6 bar.

I.12.2. Empty/Load Changeover device

The transmission of the variation in load (empty or loaded) to the braking control system (empty/load relay) can be purely
mechanical or pneumatic. The method of producing the pneumatic signal can be a mechanically operated pneumatic device,
a hydraulic to pneumatic converter device or an elastomeric to pneumatic converter device. If the pneumatic device is one
producing a step in signal pressure between empty and loaded, the automatic empty/loaded changeover device shall operate
safely — correctly with a minimum control pressure of 3 bar in ‘loaded’.

L 344/254

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

ANNEX J

VEHICLE TRACK INTERACTION AND GAUGING

Bogie and running gear

J.1.

STATIC TESTS WITH EXCEPTIONAL IN-SERVICE LOADS

Definitions of Applied Loads

The applied loads consist of:

— vertical and transverse loads,

— loads due to roll,

— loads due to braking,

— torsional loads.

Vertical and Transverse Loads

The vertical and transverse loads are calculated by reference to the nominal bogie load (for example: bogie for 20 t or 22,5 t
on-rail axle load).

In order to take the maximum dynamic load into account:

— The vertical load to be applied to the pivot bearing shall be:

— Fz max: ¼ 1,5 Fz, with Fz ¼ 4Qo − mþg (for 2-axle bogies)

— Fz max: ¼ 1,5 Fz, with Fz ¼ 6Qo − mþg (for 3-axle bogies)

If only the vertical load due to bounce is to be simulated, a load of 2 Fz shall be applied to the pivot bearing only.

The transverse load to be applied to the bogie shall be:

(cid:18)

— Fy max: ¼ 2 10 þ

(cid:19)

2Q0
3

— Fx max: ¼

(cid:18)

8
3

10 þ

(cid:19)

2Q0
3

kN (for two-axle bogies)

kN (for three-axle bogies)

NB: The transverse loads for 3-axle bogies given are based on the load distribution recorded during running trials for the
qualification of bogie type 714. For a different bogie type, the load distribution recorded during running trials with the bogie
type shall be used.

Loads due to roll

The roll coefficient α is taken to be equal to 0,3 for a spacing between the friction pads of 1 700 mm (standard 2-axle
bogies).

If the spacing between the friction pads (2 bg) differs from 1 700 mm, the value for α should be:

(cid:18)

α ¼ 0,3

(cid:19)

1700
2bg

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/255

Loads Due To Braking

The loads due to braking FB correspond to 120 % of the forces resulting from emergency braking.

On the bogie under test, these loads due to braking FB result in:

— deceleration loads,

— contact loads,

— loads applied to the brake linkages.

Torsional Loads

Loads on the bogie frame, when the bogie with its suspension is subjected to a maximum track twist of 10 ‰.

Test Procedure

Strain gauges and strain rosettes are attached to the bogie frame at all highly stressed points, in particular in zones of stress
concentration. Positioning of the gauges shall be determined, for example, by means of strain indicating varnish.

The test shall be carried out in accordance with Figure 1 and Table J5 (for 2-axle bogies) or Figure 2 and Table J6 (for 3-axle
bogies).

The test loads shall be applied in steps. Loads with values corresponding to 50 % and 75 % of the maximum values shall be
applied before applying the full load configuration.

Results To Be Obtained

The elastic limit of the material shall not be exceeded for any load case.

After removal of the test load there shall not be any evidence of permanent deformation.

L 344/256

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Static Tests With Exceptional In-Service Loads– two axle bogies

Figure J1

Table J5

Load case

Loads

Vertical

Trans- verse

Track twist g+

Braking forces

Friction pad 2
Fz2

Pivot bearing
Fzc

Friction pad 1
Fz1

Fy

2Fz

0

0

(1-α) Fz max

α Fz max

(1-α) Fz max

α Fz max

α Fz max

(1-α) Fz max

0

1,2 Fz

0

0

10 ‰

Fy max

-Fy max

FB

(cid:18)

Fymax ¼ 2 10 þ 2

FB = Braking forces

(cid:19)

Q0
3

1

2

3

4

5

Fz ¼ 4Q0 − mþg

(cid:18)

Fzmax ¼ 1,5Fz
1700
2bg

α ¼ 0,3

(cid:19)

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/257

Static Tests With Exceptional In-Service Loads– Three Axle Bogies

Figure J2

Table 6

Load Case

Loads

Vertical

Friction pad 2
Fz2

Pivot Bearing
Fzc

Friction Pad 1
Fz1

2 Fz

Transverse

Fy

Track Twist g+

Braking Force

0

0

(1-α) Fz max

α Fz max

10 ‰

(1-α) Fz max

α Fz max

Fy max

α Fz max

(1-α) Fz max

0

1,2 Fz

0

0

-Fy max

FB

1

2

3

4

5

Fz ¼ 6Q0 − mþg

Fz max ¼ 1,5 Fz
(cid:19)
(cid:18)

α ¼ 0,3

1700
2bg

(cid:18)

Fymax ¼

8
3
FB = Braking force

10 þ 2

(cid:19)

Q0
3

J.2.

STATIC TESTS WITH NORMAL IN-SERVICE LOADS

Definitions of applied loads.

The applied loads consist of:

— vertical loads on the pivot bearing and friction pads,

— a transverse load,

— loads due to braking,

— torsional loads.

L 344/258

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Vertical loads and loads due to roll

The vertical loads on the pivot bearing and friction pads shall be calculated by reference to the nominal bogie load. They
depend on:

— Fz, the static load exerted by the wagon body on each bogie

— α, the roll coefficient

— β, the bounce coefficient

The roll coefficient α is taken to be equal to 0,2 for a spacing between the friction pads of 1 700 mm (standard 2-axle
bogies).

If the spacing between the friction pads (2bg) differs from 1 700 mm, the value for α should be:

(cid:18)

α ¼ 0,2

(cid:19)

1700
2bg

The bounce coefficient β that represents the vertical dynamic behaviour of the bogie shall be taken to be equal to 0,3 (the
normal value for wagon bogies).

Transverse load

The transverse load shall be equal to:

— Fy ¼ 0,4 x 0,5 Fz þ mþg

ð

Þ (for 2-axle bogies)

— Fy ¼ 0,53 x 0,5 Fz þ mþg

ð

Þ (for 3-axle bogies)

Loads Due To Braking

The loads due to braking correspond to 100 % of the forces resulting from emergency braking.

On the bogie under test, these loads due to braking result in the following loads being applied:

— deceleration loads

— contact loads

— Loads applied to the brake linkages

Torsional Loads

Track twist, referenced to the bogie wheelbase, is taken to be equal to 5 ‰.

This twist g+ shall be simulated either by moving the supports or by applying the corresponding calculated reaction forces.

Test Procedure

Strain gauges and strain rosettes shall be attached to the bogie frame at all highly stressed points, in particular in zones of
stress concentration.

The test consists of applying various load configurations to the bogie frame that simulate:

— running on straight track

— running in curves

— dynamic load variations due to roll and bounce

— braking

— track twist

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/259

The various load cases to be applied are described in Figure 3 and Table 7 (for two-axle bogies) and Figure 4 and Table 8 (for
three-axle bogies).

After application of the first seven load cases without simulation of track twist, four further tests shall be carried out by
repeating load cases 4, 5, 6 and 7 with superposition of the track twist (value as specified for the bogie with its suspension).

For each of these four new load cases, the loads due to twist shall be applied first in one direction and then in the other.

The introduction of the track twist shall not modify the sum of the vertical forces.

Tests with application of loads corresponding to the loads due to braking shall be carried out if the results of the tests
according to Appendix A show them to be necessary (elastic limit exceeded during those tests).

Results To Be Obtained

At each measuring point, the stresses σ1…σn shall be recorded for each of the load cases defined above.

From these n values, the minimum value σmin., and the maximum value σmax. are taken in order to determine:

σmean ¼

σmax þ σmin
2

Δσ ¼

σmax − σmin
2

The behaviour of materials, including welded joints and other types of fastening, under fatigue loading should be based on
current international or national standards, or alternative sources of equivalent standing such as the one based on ERRI B12
Committee report RPI7, wherever such sources are available.

Suitable data shall generally exhibit the following characteristics:

a high probability of survival (i.e. preferably 97,5 %, but at least 95 %);

classification of details according to the component or joint geometry (including stress concentration);

derivation of the limiting values from small-scale samples using a test technique and previous experience to guarantee their
applicability to full size components.

If the stress limits to be respected are those given in the fatigue strength diagrams in ERRI B12 Committee report RPI7, it will
be permissible to exceed these stress limits by up to 20 % at a limited number of measurement points, which shall then be
monitored with particular care during the fatigue testing. If no incipient cracks are found during testing, the stresses
exceeding the limit recorded during static testing shall be accepted and the bogie shall be approved.

L 344/260

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Static Tests With Normal In Service Loads– Two Axle Bogies

Figure J3

Table J7

Loads

Load Case

Vertical

Transverse

Braking Forces

Friction pad 2 Fz2

Pivot Bearing Fzc

Friction Pad 1 Fz1

Fy

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Fz ¼ 4Q0 − mþg
(cid:19)
(cid:18)

α ¼ 0,2

1700
2bg

0

0

0

0

Fz

(1+β)Fz

(1-β)Fz

0

0

0

(1-α)(1+β) Fz

α(1+β)Fz

α(1+β)Fz

(1-α)(1+β) Fz

0

0

(1-α)(1-β) Fz

α(1-β)Fz

α(1-β)Fz

(1-α)(1-β) Fz

0

Fz

0

0

β=0,3

Fy

-Fy

Fy

-Fy

FB

Fy ¼ 0,4 (cid:2) 0,5 Fz þ mþg
Þ

ð

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/261

Static Tests With Normal In-Service Loads– Three Axle Bogies

Figure J4

Table J8

Loads

Load Case

Vertical

Transverse

Braking Forces

Friction Pad 2 Fz2

Pivot Bearing Fzc

Friction Pad 1 Fz1

Fy

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Fz ¼ 6Qo − mþg
(cid:19)
(cid:18)

α ¼ 0,2

1700
2bg

0

0

0

0

Fz

(1+β) Fz

(1-β) Fz

0

0

0

(1-α)(1+β)Fz

α(1+β) Fz

α(1+β) Fz

(1-α)(1+β)Fz

0

0

(1-α)(1-β)Fz

α(1-β) Fz

α(1-β) Fz

(1-α)(1-β)Fz

0

Fz

0

0

β=0,3

Fy

-Fy

Fy

-Fy

FB

Fy ¼ 0,53 (cid:2) 0,5 Fz þ mþg
Þ

ð

L 344/262

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

J.3.

FATIGUE TESTS

Definitions of applied loads

The applied loads consist of:

— vertical loads on the pivot bearing and friction pads

— a transverse load

— loads due to braking

— torsional loads

Vertical Loads And Loads Due To Roll

— The vertical loads on the pivot bearing and friction pads shall be calculated by reference to the nominal bogie load.

They depend on:

— Fz, the static load exerted by the wagon body on each bogie

— α, the roll coefficient = 0,2

— β, the bounce coefficient = 0,3

Fz is a static load. The loads due to the coefficient α are considered to be ‘quasi static’. The loads due to the coefficient β are
considered to be ‘dynamic’.

The roll coefficient α is taken to be equal to 0,2 for a spacing between the friction pads of 1 700 mm (standard two-axle
bogies). If the spacing between the friction pads (2bg) differs from 1 700 mm, the value for α shall be:

(cid:18)

α ¼ 0,2

(cid:19)

1700
2bg

Transverse Loads

The transverse loads consist of two components:

— Two-axle bogies:

— quasi-static load: Fyq ¼ 0,1 Fz þ mþg
Þ

ð

— dynamic load: Fyq ¼ 0,1 Fz þ mþg
Þ

ð

— Three-axle bogies:

— quasi-static load: Fyq ¼ 0,133 Fz þ mþg
Þ

ð

— dynamic load: Fyd ¼ 0,133 Fz þ mþg
Þ

ð

Loads Due To Braking

The loads due to braking correspond to 100 % of the forces resulting from emergency braking.

On the bogie under test, these loads due to braking result in the following loads being applied:

— deceleration loads,

— contact loads,

— loads applied to the brake linkages.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/263

Torsional Loads

Track twist, referenced to the bogie wheelbase, shall be 5 ‰.

Test Procedure

The fatigue tests consist of alternating quasi-static and dynamic load sequences that represent running through right and
left-hand curves.

If the static tests defined in Appendix B have shown that the track twist induced stresses only in limited zones of the bogie
frame, where the stresses caused by the vertical and transverse loads are minor, the fatigue test, as a first stage, shall be
performed with only vertical and transverse loads.

In this case, the vertical and transverse quasi-static and dynamic loads shall vary with time as shown in the diagrams in
Figures 3, 5, 6 and 7 (for two-axle bogies) or in Figures 5, 6, 7 and 8 (for three-axle bogies).

In each sequence corresponding to a curve to the right or to the left, the number of dynamic cycles, vertically and
transversely, shall be 20.

The dynamic variations of the vertical and transverse loads shall be of the same frequency and shall be in phase, as shown in
the diagrams. The number of sequences simulating right hand curves and left hand curves in the test shall be the same.

In this first test stage, the number of cycles of dynamic load variations shall be 6 × 106.

The second test stage shall consist of 2 × 106 cycles, with the static forces unchanged and the quasi-static and dynamic forces
multiplied by 1,2.

The third test stage shall also consist of 2 × 106 cycles and is performed as the second stage, but with the factor 1,2 replaced
by 1,4.

Tests with application of loads corresponding to the loads due to braking shall be carried out if the results of the tests
according to section 2 show them to be necessary (elastic limit exceeded during those tests).

Torsional Loads

A total of 106 alternating torsional load cycles shall be applied in all:

— 6 × 105 during the first test stage

— 2 × 105 during each of the other two stages

When specifying the torsional tests, the results of the static tests and the capabilities of the existing test facilities shall be
taken into account.

If the static tests have shown that the bogie frame is not affected by track twist, it shall not be taken into account.

If the static tests in Appendix B show that the effects of the track twist loads are clearly different from those resulting from
the vertical and transverse forces (e.g. because the stresses occur in different zones), the 6 × 105 plus twice 2 × 105 cycles of
torsional loading can be applied separately from the vertical and transverse loads. Otherwise, the test setup shall be adapted
in order to apply the vertical, transverse and track twist loads simultaneously.

The loads that simulate the effect of track twist shall correspond to those that occur when the suspension is functioning with
damping.

Results To Be Obtained

No cracks shall be found after application of the 6 × 106 cycles of the first test stage. This shall be confirmed by non-
destructive inspection (magnetic particle or dye penetration test) after every 1 × 106 cycles.

At the end of the second test stage, only the occurrence of small cracks, that would not require immediate repairs if they
occurred in service, shall be acceptable.

L 344/264

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

The evolution of the stresses at the locations of highest stress found during the static test (paragraph 6.1.1.2.1.3) shall be
monitored by means of strain gauges during the fatigue test, and in particular where stresses exceeding the stress limit have
been tolerated in accordance with paragraph 6.1.1.2.1.3

Fatigue Tests on Two-Axle Bogies

Refer to figure J3.

Load On Pivot Bearing

Figure J5

8
>><

>>:

Fz ¼ 4Q0 − mþg
(cid:19)
(cid:18)
1700
α ¼ 0,2
2bg

β ¼ 0,3
Fzc ¼ 1 − α
ð

Þ F ± β 1 − α

ð

Þ Fz

Loads On Friction Pads

Figure J6

{Fz1 ¼ αFz±βαFz

{Fz2 ¼ αFz±βαFz

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/265

Transverse load acting on the pivot bearing

Figure J7

{Fy ¼ ± 0,1 Fz ± mþg
ð

½

Þ± 0,1 Fz þ mþg
(cid:138)
Þ

ð

Fatigue Tests — Three Axle Bogies

Figure J8

L 344/266

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Load on Pivot Bearing

Refer to fig. J5.

Fz ¼ 6Q0 − mþg
(cid:19)
(cid:18)
1700
α ¼ 0,2
2bg

β ¼ 0,3
Fzc ¼ 1 − α
ð

Þ F ± β 1 − α

ð

Þ Fz

8
>><

>>:

Loads on Friction Pads

Refer to figure J6.

n

Fz1 ¼ αFz ± βαFz
Fz2 ¼ αFz ± βαFz

Transverse Load Acting on the Pivot Bearing

Refer to figure J7

Fy ¼ ± 0,133 Fz þ mþg

ð

½

Þ þ 0,133 Fz þ mþg
(cid:138)
Þ
ð

J.4. NOTATION

Qo = Static vertical force at the level of the wheel for a loaded wagon (kN)

m+ = Bogie mass (t)

Fz = Static vertical force acting on a bogie for a loaded wagon (kN)

Fz = 4Qo- m+g (for 2-axle bogies)

Fz = 6Qo — m+g (for 3-axle bogies)

g = Acceleration due to gravity (9,8 m/s2)

Fy = Transverse force (kN)

FB = Braking forces (kN)

g+ = Track twist to be applied to the bogie axles ( ‰)

α = Coefficient corresponding to the effect of roll

The coefficient is a function of the spacing 2bg

β = Coefficient corresponding to the effect of bounce

2bg = Friction pad spacing (mm)

J.5. OVERVIEW/GUIDELINES

The tests can be divided into three groups:

— Static tests with exceptional in-service loads

These tests verify that there is no risk of permanent and visible deformation of the bogie frame due to the
superposition of the maximum loads that can occur in service.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/267

— Static tests to simulate normal in-service dynamic loads

These tests verify that there is no risk of fatigue cracks occurring due to the superposition of in-service loads.

— Fatigue tests

The purpose of these tests is to determine the service life of the bogie frame, to detect potential hidden weak spots —
in particular at locations where it is not possible to attach strain gauges, — and to assess the safety margin.

Common Conditions For Rig Tests

The tests shall be performed using a test set-up that allows the application and distribution of the loads exactly at the same
locations where they occur in service, while at the same time correctly simulating the play and the degrees of freedom
associated with the suspension and the elements connecting the bogie to the body.

The tests can be performed with or without the suspension.

The suspension damping devices shall be de-activated so as to prevent friction.

The constructional characteristics of the bogie shall be taken into account when determining the manner in which the loads
and the resulting reaction forces are applied to the bogie frame. The sketch below shows an example of the application of
the loads on 2-axle bogies.

The loads to be applied are detailed in Appendices A, B and C.

L 344/268

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

ANNEX K

VEHICLE TRACK INTERACTION AND GAUGING

Wheelset

K.1

ASSEMBLY OF COMPONENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

268

K.1.1 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

268

K.1.2 Interference between axle wheelseat and wheel bore hub . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

268

K.1.3 Press fitting diagram . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

268

K.2 WHEELSET CHARACTERISTICS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

269

K.2.1 Mechanical resistance of the assemblies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

269

K.3 DIMENSIONS AND TOLERANCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

269

K.3.1 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

269

K.3.2 Characteristics of mounted wheels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

269

K.3.3 Overhang of the wheel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

270

K.4

PROTECTION AGAINST CORROSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

270

K.1 ASSEMBLY OF COMPONENTS.

K.1.1 General.

Before fitting, all elements which comprise the wheelset, shall comply with the geometric requirements of the documents
which define them. The wheels and axle shall be ready to assemble.

It is permissible to either shrink-fit or press-fit the wheelset elements. Wheelset journal bearings shall fitted onto the
wheelset according to the manufacturer's instructions.

The static imbalance of the two wheels of each wheelset shall be in the same diametrical plane and on the same side of the
axle.

K.1.2 Interference between axle wheelseat and wheel bore hub.

Where no specific interference fit has been specified, the interference ‘j’ in mm shall be:

— shrink fit: 0,0009 dm ≤ j ≤ 0,0015 dm

— press fit: 0,0010 dm ≤ j ≤ 0,0015 dm + 0,06

where dm is the mean diameter of the wheelseat in mm.

K.1.3 Press fitting diagram.

For press fitting, a force-displacement curve gives confidence that the fitted surfaces are not damaged and that the specified
interference has been achieved.

The range of the end fitting force, depends on the force F defined in K.2.1 and shall be:

0,85 F < end fitting force < 1,45 F

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/269

K.2 WHEELSET CHARACTERISTICS.

K.2.1 Mechanical resistance of the assemblies.

Wheelsets shall be tested to prove correct wheel fitment using a press incorporating a force-recording device. A proving
thrust F shall be gradually and uniformly applied around the wheel and sustained for a period of 30 seconds. Unless
otherwise specified by the designer, the value of the force F shall be:

F ¼ 4 (cid:2) 10 − 3dm MN

where 0,8dm<L<1,1 dm

and dm is the mean diameter of the wheel seat (mm); L is the length of the wheel hub (mm).

Results to be achieved.

There shall be no displacement of the wheel relative to the axle after the application of the proving thrust.

K.3 DIMENSIONS AND TOLERANCES.

K.3.1 General.

The dimensions of the wheelset shall be in accordance with the design drawings. The dimensional and geometrical
tolerances to be applied in the assembly of the different component parts on the wheelset are given in the following
subclauses.

Measurements shall be made without any load on the wheelset.

K.3.2 Characteristics of mounted wheels.

Fig. K6

L 344/270

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Table K18

Description

Symbol

Tolerance (mm)

≤120km/h

>120km/h

Distance between internal wheel faces (1)
(Back-to-Back Distance)

Distance between the Flange Back and the plane showing, on the
journal side, the corresponding bearing collar

Difference in tread circle diameter.

Radial deviation at the tread

Axial deviation of the Flange Backs (1)

(1) Measured 60 mm below the top of the flange.
(2) Tolerances may be changed for special design wheelsets.

a1

c — c1 or
c1 — c

d — d1 or
d1 — d

h

g

+ 2 (2)
0

≤ 1

≤ 0,5

≤ 0,5

≤ 0,8

≤ 0,3

≤ 0,3

≤ 0,5

K.3.3 Overhang of the wheel.

The lengths of the wheelseat and the wheel hub shall be selected so that the hub slightly overlaps the wheelseat, especially on
the axle body side. The overlap length shall be between 2 and 7 mm.

K.4 PROTECTION AGAINST CORROSION.

Wheelsets components shall be protected according to the requirements of their design specification.

It is permissible for cavities arising from the overhang of the wheel hub on the wheelseat to be filled with an anticorrosion
product.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/271

ANNEX L

VEHICLE TRACK INTERACTION AND GAUGING

Wheels

L.1.

Design assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

273

L.1.1.

General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

273

L.1.2.

Design parameters to be assessed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

273

L.1.2.1.

Parameters for geometrical compatibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

273

L.1.2.2.

Parameters for thermo mechanical Compatibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

274

L.1.2.3.

Parameters for mechanical assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

274

L.1.3.

Assessment of geometrical Compatibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

274

L.1.4.

Assessment of thermo mechanical compatibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

274

L.1.4.1.

General procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

274

L.1.4.2.

First step: Braking bench test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

274

L.1.4.2.1. Test procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

274

L.1.4.2.2. Decision criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

275

L.1.4.3

Second step: Wheel fracture bench test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

275

L.1.4.3.1 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

275

L.1.4.3.2 Wheel fracture bench test procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

275

L.1.4.3.3 Decision criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

275

L.1.4.4

Third step: Field braking test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

275

L.1.4.4.1 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

275

L.1.4.4.2 Test procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

275

L.1.4.4.3 Decision criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

275

L.1.5

Assessment of mechanical compatibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

276

L.1.5.1

General procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

276

L.1.5.2

First step: calculation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

276

L.1.5.2.1 Applied forces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

276

L.1.5.2.2 Calculation procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

277

L.1.5.2.3 Decision criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

277

L 344/272

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

L.1.5.3

Second step: Bench test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

L.1.5.3.1 General.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

L.1.5.3.2 Definitions of the bench loading and test procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

L.1.5.3.3 Decision criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

L.2

L.2.1

PRODUCT ASSESSMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Mechanical characteristics linked to wear:

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

L.2.1.1

Tensile test characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

L.2.1.2

Hardness characteristics in the rim . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

L.2.1.3

Heat treatment homogeneity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

L.2.2

Mechanical characteristics linked to safety:

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

L.2.2.1

Impact test characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

L.2.2.2

Toughness characteristic of the rim . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

L.2.3

Material cleanliness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

L.2.3.1

Micrographic cleanliness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

L.2.3.2

Internal integrity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

L.2.4

Surface condition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

L.2.4.1

Characteristics to be achieved . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

L.2.5

L.2.6

L.2.7

L.2.8

Surface integrity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Geometrical tolerances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Static imbalance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Protection against corrosion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

277

277

277

277

278

278

278

279

279

279

279

279

280

280

280

280

280

281

281

284

284

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/273

L.1 DESIGN ASSESSMENT

L.1.1 General

This chapter describes the assessment methods for wheel design in order to meet the performance requirements. There are
three main aspects of a wheel's performance, each of which has different aims:

— Geometrical

— to ensure compatibility with the track

— to ensure compatibility with the axle

— Thermo mechanical:

— to manage wheel deformation

— to ensure that braking does not induce broken wheels

— Mechanical:

— to ensure compatibility with the intended axle load

— to ensure that wheels do not fail due to fatigue

L.1.2 Design parameters to be assessed.

L.1.2.1 Parameters for geometrical compatibility

There are three sets of parameters that are linked to functional, assembly or maintenance purposes.

— Functional purposes

— Nominal tread diameter: it affects buffer height and the loading gauge.

— Rim width: it interfaces with Switches and Crossings.

— Cone angle of the tread: it influences the stability of the vehicle

— Tread profile outside of conical part of the tread

— Flange height, thickness and angle

— Transition between the flange and the active part of the tread

— Rim position with reference to the wheel seat position on the axle

— Parallelism of bore diameter

— Assembly purposes

— Bore diameter

— Hub length in order to ensure an adequate overhang of the wheel hub on the axle wheel seat.

— Maintenance purposes

— Wear limit diameter of the tread

— Wear groove shape

— Geometry of the area for wheel clamping on reprofiling machines

— Position of the hole for oil injection of dismantling

— General rim shape in order to allow ultrasonic residual stress measurement for tread braked wheels.

L 344/274

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

L.1.2.2 Parameters for thermo mechanical Compatibility

Wheels shall be capable of absorbing the heat energy that is dissipated during service. This amount of energy generated is
dependent upon:

— The energy created by the friction of the brake blocks on the tread .

— Type of brake blocks (nature, dimensions and number)

L.1.2.3 Parameters for mechanical assessment

— Maximum axle load of wheelset

— Nature of the duty cycle

— description of the lines: geometrical quality of track, curve parameters, maximum speed...

— proportion of time travelling on these differing lines

— Distance travelled during the whole life of the wheel

L.1.3 Assessment of geometrical Compatibility

The drawing of the wheel shall be in conformity with the requirements that are defined according to the paragraph above:
parameters for geometrical compatibility.

L.1.4 Assessment of thermo mechanical compatibility

L.1.4.1 General procedure

All new designs of wheels shall be fully assessed using methods that are appropriate to the application to demonstrate that
they satisfy the requirements set out in this Annex.

This assessment shall be composed of three steps. If step 1 is passed, no further assessment is necessary. If step 1 is failed,
step 2 shall be applied. If step 2 is passed, no further assessment is necessary. Step 3 assesses a marginal failure of steps 1 and
2. If step 3, is failed the wheel shall be considered to be non-compliant. For each step, tests shall be made on a wheel with a
new rim (tread at its nominal diameter) and on a wheel with a worn rim (tread at its wear limit diameter).

In each case, the wheel selected for test shall have the worst case rim geometry for thermo mechanical behaviour; a validated
numerical simulation shall confirm the selection. Where it is not possible to test the worst case wheel, the results shall be
extrapolated to the worst case by the same numerical simulation.

L.1.4.2 First step: Braking bench test.

L.1.4.2.1 Te s t p r o c e d u r e .

The power to be applied for 45 minutes during this test shall be equal to 1,2Pa.

Pa ¼ m:g:V a pente þ m γ va

where

m =
g =
slope =
γ =
Va =

vehicle mass on rail per wheel (kg)
gravitational acceleration (m/s2)
average slope of the line (slope in ‰/1 000)
deceleration of the train (m/s2)
vehicle velocity (m/s)

Refer to same slope as in 4.2.4.1.2.5 South Gothard slope, one calculation brake down the Gothard at a speed of 80kmh.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/275

L.1.4.2.2 D e c i s i o n c r i t e r i a .

Three criteria shall be satisfied simultaneously for the new wheel and for the worn wheel.

For the new wheel:

1.

2.

maximum lateral displacement of the rim during braking + 3/-1 mm

residual stresses in the rim after cooling:

— σrn (cid:20) þΣr N=mm2 as an average over three measurements

— σin (cid:20) þðΣr þ 50Þ N=mm2 for each measurement

3.

maximum lateral displacement of the rim after cooling + 1,5/-0,5 mm.

Lateral displacement is considered to be positive when the distance between the flange backs increases.

For the worn wheel:

1.

2.

maximum lateral displacement of the rim during braking + 3/-1mm

residual stresses in the rim after cooling:

— σrw (cid:20) þðΣr þ 75Þ N=mm2 as an average over three measurements

— σiw (cid:20) þðΣr þ 100Þ N=mm2 for each measurement

3.

maximum lateral displacement of the rim after cooling + 1,5/-0,5mm

The value of Σr shall be determined according to the steel grade requirements of the wheel rim. For ER6 and ER7 grades of
EN13262, Σr ¼ 200 N=mm2.

For other steel grades, another value for Σr shall be agreed.

L.1.4.3 Second step: Wheel fracture bench test.

L.1.4.3.1 G e n e r a l .

This second step shall be take place if the residual stresses measured in the first step are above the decision criteria.

L.1.4.3.2 W h e e l

f r a c t u r e b e n c h t e s t p r o c e d u r e

The test procedure for the wheel fracture bench test shall comply with Annex A.3 of EN13979-1.

L.1.4.3.3 D e c i s i o n c r i t e r i a .

The tested wheel shall remain unfractured.

L.1.4.4 Third step: Field braking test.

L.1.4.4.1 G e n e r a l .

This third step shall take place if one result of the first step is above a decision criterion and if the wheel is not rejected after
the second step.

L.1.4.4.2 Te s t p r o c e d u r e .

The power to be applied during this test shall be as defined in Step 1 of this assessment.

L.1.4.4.3 D e c i s i o n c r i t e r i a .

Three criteria shall be satisfied simultaneously for the new wheel and for the worn wheel.

L 344/276

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

For the new wheel:

1.

2.

maximum lateral displacement of the rim during braking + 3/-1mm.

residual stresses in the rim after cooling:

— σrn (cid:20) þðΣr − 50Þ N=mm2 as an average over three measurements

— σin (cid:20) þΣr N=mm2 for each measurement

3.

maximum lateral displacement of the rim after cooling + 1,5/-0,5mm.

For the worn wheel:

1.

2.

maximum lateral displacement of the rim during braking + 3/-1mm

residual stresses in the rim after cooling:

— σrw (cid:20) þΣr N=mm2 as an average over three measurements

— σiw (cid:20) þðΣr þ 50Þ N=mm2 for each measurement

3.

maximum lateral displacement of the rim after cooling + 1,5/-0,5mm

The value of Σr shall be fixed according to steel grade requirements of the wheel rim.

For ER6 and ER7 grades of EN13262, Σr ¼ 200 N=mm2.

For other steel grades, another value for Σr shall be agreed.

L.1.5 Assessment of mechanical compatibility

L.1.5.1 General procedure.

This assessment shall be composed of two steps. If step 1 is passed no further assessment is necessary. If step 1 is failed step
2 shall be applied. If step 2 is failed the wheel shall be considered to be non-compliant. The purpose of this assessment is to
verify that no fatigue cracks initiate in the web during the whole life of the wheel.

The worst case wheel geometry for mechanical behaviour shall be assessed. Where the bench test wheel is not the worst
case, test parameters shall be extrapolated to the worst case by a validated numerical simulation.

L.1.5.2 First step: calculation.

L.1.5.2.1 A p p l i e d f o r c e s .

The forces to be applied shall use the force P as a basis.

P is half the vertical force per wheelset on rail.

Three load cases shall be considered (see fig. L1):

— Case 1: straight track

Fz ¼ 1,25 P

Fy1 ¼ 0

— Case 2: full curves

Fz ¼ 1,25 P

Fy2 ¼ 0,6 P P for non-guiding wheelsets

Fy2 ¼ 0,7 P P for guiding wheelsets

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/277

— Case 3: negotiation of points and crossings

Fz ¼ 1,25 P

For non-guiding wheelsets

Fy2 ¼ 0,36 P

Fy3 ¼ 0,6

For guiding wheelsets

Fy2 ¼ 0,42 P

Fy3 ¼ 0,6

Figure. L1

L.1.5.2.2 C a l c u l a t i o n p r o c e d u r e .

A validated finite element analysis program shall be used to calculate the stresses in the wheel.

L.1.5.2.3 D e c i s i o n c r i t e r i a .

The range of the dynamic stresses Δσ shall be lower than the permissible stresses at all points on the web.

The permissible range of dynamic stresses, A, are as follows :

— for wheels with a machined web, A= 360 N/mm2

— for wheels with a non-machined web, A= 290 N/mm2

L.1.5.3 Second step: Bench test.

L.1.5.3.1 G e n e r a l .

This second step shall be used if the result of the first step is above a decision criterion.

L.1.5.3.2 D e f i n i t i o n s o f

t h e b e n c h l o a d i n g a n d t e s t p r o c e d u r e .

They shall be agreed between the designer of the wheel and the Notified Body.

L.1.5.3.3 D e c i s i o n c r i t e r i a .

Four wheels shall be tested.

No fatigue cracks ≥1mm shall exist after the test.

L 344/278

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

L.2

PRODUCT ASSESSMENT

L.2.1 Mechanical characteristics linked to wear:

L.2.1.1 Tensile test characteristics

Rim and web characteristics shall be as listed in table L1.

Table L1

Steel Grade

ReH(N/mm2) (1)

Rm (N/mm2)

Rim

ER6

ER7

ER8

≥ 500

≥ 520

≥ 540

780/900

820/940

860/980

Web

Rm reduction≥ (N/
mm2) (2)

≥ 100

≥ 110

≥ 120

A5 %

≥ 16

≥ 16

≥ 16

A5 %

≥ 15

≥ 14

≥ 13

If no distinctive yield strength is present, the proof stress R p0,2 shall be determined.

(1)
(2) Reduction of tensile strength as compared with tensile strength of the rim on the same wheel.

Locations of test specimens are given in figure. L2.

Figure L2

Figure l2 — locations of test specimens

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/279

L.2.1.2 Hardness characteristics in the rim

The minimum values of Brinell hardness in the whole wear zone of the rim shall be ≥ the values in table L3 for each reading.
These values shall be achieved up to a maximum depth of 35 mm below the nominal tread, even if the wear-depth is greater
than 35 mm.

Hardness values in the rim/web transition shall be at least 10 points lower than the wear limit values.

Table L3

Steel Grade

Minimum Brinell hardness value

ER6

ER7

ER8

225

235

245

L.2.1.3 Heat treatment homogeneity

The hardness values measured on the rim shall be contained within a range of 30 HB.

L.2.2 Mechanical characteristics linked to safety:

L.2.2.1 Impact test characteristics

Two sets of impact tests shall be carried out; one set with test specimens at + 20 oC, one set with test specimens at –20 oC. In
each set of tests, three specimens shall be tested (marked as specimen 3 in Figure L.2). Table 4 gives the values to be achieved.
The marking of the impact test samples shall enable identification of the longitudinal surfaces that are parallel to section A-
A. The test pieces shall be prepared in accordance with EN 10045-1. The axis of the bottom of the notch shall be parallel to
the section A-A in figure L1. At + 20 oC, U notch specimens shall be used. At - 20 oC, V notch specimens shall be used.

Table L4

Steel Grade

KU (in joules) at + 20 oC

KV (in joules) at –20 oC

Average

Minimum

Average

Minimum

ER6

ER7

ER8

17

17

17

12

12

12

12

10

10

8

7

5

L.2.2.2 Toughness characteristic of the rim

This characteristic need only be verified on tread braked wheels (service brake or parking brake). Table L6 gives the
minimum values to be achieved.

Table L6

Steel Grade

Average (over 6 test pieces)

Single test piece minimum

N/mm2√m

N/mm2√m

ER6

ER7

ER8

100

80

70

80

70

60

L 344/280

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

L.2.3 Material cleanliness

L.2.3.1 Micrographic cleanliness

Material cleanliness shall be measured by micrographic examination (ISO 4967 method A). The location from which the
samples shall be taken is shown in figure L3.

Figure L. 3

Values to be achieved are given in table L6.

Table L6

Type of inclusions

Thick series (maximum)

Thin series (maximum)

A (Sulphides)

B (Aluminates)

C (Silicates)

D (Globular Oxides)

B + C + D

L.2.3.2 Internal integrity

1,5

1,5

1,5

1,5

3

2

2

2

2

4

Internal integrity of all wheels shall be determined by an automatic ultrasonic examination. Standard defects are flat bottom
holes with different diameters.

The rim shall have no internal defects that give echo magnitudes higher than or equal to those obtained for a standard
defect, situated at the same depth. The diameter of this standard defect is 3 mm.

There shall be no attenuation of the back echo higher than 4dB during axial examination.

L.2.4 Surface condition

L.2.4.1 Characteristics to be achieved.

According to their use, wheels may be fully or part machined. Their surface shall not show any marks other than those
stipulated in here.

The parts which remain as non machined shall be shot-blasted for Ra<25 μm, perfectly dressed and smoothly blended into
the machined areas.

The average surface roughness (Ra) of ‘finished’ or ‘ready for assembly’ wheels is given in table L8.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/281

Table L8

Area of the wheel

State of Delivery

Roughness Ra (μm)

Bore

Finished

Web and hub

Rim Tread

Rim Faces

Ready for assembly (1)

Finished (2)

Finished

Finished

≤12,5

0,8 to 3,2

≤12,5

≤12,5 (3)

≤12,5 (3)

If the wheel is to be fitted on a hollow axle, other values may be required for the purpose of the in-service ultrasonic inspection.
If so defined, this area of the wheel may remain unmachined, provided the tolerances indicated in this table are achieved.

(1)
(2)
(3) ≤ 6,3 if required for a standard defect of 2mm.

L.2.5 Surface integrity

Surface integrity of the web shall be confirmed by a magnetic particle test or an alternative process having at least equivalent
sensitivity. The limit defect shall be equal to 2mm in the case of a machined web.

L.2.6 Geometrical tolerances

The geometry and dimensions of wheels shall be defined by a drawing. The geometrical tolerances shall comply with those
in table L9. The symbols used are shown in figure. L4.

L 344/282

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Figure L4

Symbols

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/283

Table L9

Tolerances (mm)

Designation

Symbols (see fig L4)

Values

Dimensions

Geometrical
(1)

Unmachined

Machined

External diameter

Internal diameter (outer)

Internal diameter (inner)

Width

Tread profile (3)

Circularity of the tread

Total run out in axial direction

m
R

i

Total run out in radial direction of the jaw hold

External diameter of the groove (i.e. wear line)

External diameter (outer)

External diameter (inner)

Internal diameter of the bore:

‘finished’

‘finished ready’ for assembly

Cylindricity of internal diameter of the bore:

b
u
H

‘finished’

‘finished ready for assembly’

Length

Hub to wheel overhang

Total run out of the diameter of the bore:

‘finished’

‘finished ready for assembly’

Position for the web at the connection with the rim
and the hub

b
e
W

Thickness at the connection with the rim

Thickness at the connection with the hub

a

b1

b2

d

w

f1

t2

g1

g2

h

r

m

n

0/+4

0/-4

0/-4

± 1

≤ 0,5

≤ 0,2

≤ 0,3

≤ 0,2

0/+2

0/+5

0/+5

0/-6

0/+10

0/+10

0/-2

See Annex K or in accord-
ance with the drawing

≤ 0,2

≤ 0,02 (2)

0/+2

0/+2

≤ 0,2

≤ 0,1

≤ 8

+5/0

+5/0

≤ 8

+8/0

+10/0

v

s

t

j

x1

x2

q1

q2

k

See ISO 1101

(1)
(2) Any slight taper within the permitted tolerance shall be such as the ‘larger’ diameter is at the axle-entry end of the bore on assembly.
(3)

From the top of the flange as far as the external chamfer.

L 344/284

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

L.2.7 Static imbalance

The maximum static imbalance of a finished wheel in the delivery condition is defined in table L10.

The means and methods of measurement shall be defined between the customer and the supplier.

Table L10

Static imbalance
g . m

≤ 125
≤ 75

Symbol

E3
E2

For vehicles running at Speed v km/h

v ≤ 120
120 < v ≤ 200

L.2.8 Protection against corrosion

Protection shall be provided in accordance with the wheel design specification.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/285

ANNEX M

VEHICLE TRACK INTERACTION AND GAUGING

Axle

M.1. DESIGN ASSESSMENT

M.1.1. General

The following major phases for the definition of an axle are:

a)

b)

Identification of the forces to be taken into account and calculation of the moments on the various sections of the
axle.

Selection of the diameters for axle-body and journals. On the basis of the selected diameters, calculation of the
diameters for the other sections.

c)

The options taken shall be verified by:

— Stress calculation for each section.

— Comparison of the stresses with the maximum permissible stresses.

The permissible stresses are essentially defined by:

— The steel grade.

— Whether the axle is solid or hollow.

M.1.2. Identification of forces and calculation of moments.

Two types of forces shall be addressed:

— Masses in motion.

— Braking.

M.1.3. Geometrical and dimensional tolerances

M.1.3.1. Selection of the diameters for journals and axle body.

In selecting the diameters of the journals and axle body, reference shall be made initially to existing sizes of associated
components e.g. bearings.

The selection of diameters shall be verified by comparing the calculated stresses with the maximum permissible stresses. A
very shallow groove (0,1 to 0,2 mm) shall be provided, so that the end of the inner bearing ring does not cause any notch
effect on the journal.

M.1.3.2. Selection of the diameters of the various seats from the diameter of the axle body or of the journals.

M . 1 . 3 . 2 . 1 . C o l l a r b e a r i n g s u r f a c e .

In order to standardise whenever possible, the diameter of the collar bearing surface shall be 30 mm greater than that of the
journal. The transition between the journal and the collar bearing surface shall be provided as illustrated in figure M3 (detail
V).

M . 1 . 3 . 2 . 2 . T r a n s i t i o n b e t w e e n t h e c o l l a r b e a r i n g s u r f a c e a n d w h e e l s e a t .

In order to standardise whenever possible, this transition shall have only one radius of 25 mm.

If this value cannot be met, the highest possible value shall be selected in order to minimise the stress concentration on this
area.

L 344/286

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

M . 1 . 3 . 2 . 3 . W h e e l s e a t .

The ratio between the wheelseat and the axle body diameters shall be at least equal to 1,12 at the wheel seat wear limit. It is
recommended that this ratio is at least 1,15 for an axle in new condition.

The transition between these two areas shall be provided in such a way that the stress concentration remains at the lowest
possible level.

In order to have the lowest value of the stress concentration factor at the transition between axle body and wheelseat, the
value of the biggest radius on the axle body side shall be at least 75mm.

M.1.4. Maximum permissible stresses.

The maximum permissible stresses shall be derived from:

— The fatigue limit in rotating bending for the various areas of the axle.

— The value of a factor of safety ‘S’ which varies with the steel grade.

M.1.4.1. Steel grade EA1N

The following values shall be used:

— For a solid axle :

— 200 N/mm2 without press-fit.

— 120 N/mm2 with press-fit.

— For a hollow axle :

— 200 N/mm2 without press-fit.

— 110 N/mm2 with press-fit (apart from journal).

— 94 N/mm2 with press-fit on the journal.

— 80 N/mm2 for the surface of the bore.

For solid and hollow axles, the value of security coefficient ‘S’, by which fatigue limits shall be divided to obtain the
maximum permissible stresses is 1,2.

For hollow axles, these permissible stresses are applicable if the ratio of journal diameter to bore diameter is < 3 or the ratio
of wheelseat diameter to bore diameter is < 4.

M.1.4.2. Steel grades other than EA1N.

The fatigue limit shall be determined for the following areas of the axle:

— The surface of the axle body.

— The bearing surface with an equal clamping condition at the wheelseats.

In the case of a hollow axle, the fatigue limit shall also be determined for the bearing surface with an equivalent bearing/axle
interference condition.

— The surface of the bore.

The value of the factor of safety ‘S’ shall be determined with regard to the sensitivity of the steel grade to the notch effect.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/287

M.2. PRODUCT ASSESSMENT

M.2.1. Mechanical characteristics:

M.2.1.1. Characteristics from tensile test

The values to be obtained at the mid-radius of solid axles or at the mid-distance between external and internal surfaces of
hollow axles are given in table M1.

ReH (N/mm2) (1)

≥ 320

Table M1

Rm (N/mm2)

≥ 550

A5 %

≥ 22

(1)

If no distinctive yield strength is present, the proof stress Rp0,2 shall be determined.

M.2.1.2. Impact test characteristics

Impact test characteristics shall be determined at 20 oC in the longitudinal and transverse direction. Three test samples shall
be taken from adjacent positions from each test section. The test samples shall be taken from the locations indicated in fig
M1. Values to be obtained at the mid-radius of solid axles, or at the mid-distance between external and internal surfaces of
hollow axles, are given in table M1.

No individual values shall be lower than 70 % of the values in table M2.

Figure M1

Table M2

KU longitudinal (J)

KU transverse (J)

≥ 30

≥ 20

L 344/288

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

M.2.2. Microstructure characteristics

The microstructure shall be one of ferrite and pearlite. The grain size shall not be greater than those defined by the reference
diagram of type V of ISO 643.

M.2.3. Material micrographic cleanliness

Material cleanliness shall be measured by micrographic examination (ISO 4967 method A). The location from which the
samples shall be taken is shown in fig. M2. Maximum values of thick series inclusions to be obtained are given in table M3.

Table M3

Type of inclusions

Thick series (maximum)

A (Sulphides)

B (Aluminates)

C (Silicates)

D (Globular oxides)

B + C + D

1,5

1,5

1,5

1,5

3

Figure M2

M.2.4. Internal integrity

Internal integrity shall be determined by ultrasonic examination.

Axles shall have no internal defects that give echo magnitudes higher than or equal to those obtained for a standard defect,
situated at the same depth. For the purposes of this test, a standard defect shall be a 3mm diameter flat-bottomed hole.

There shall be no attenuation of the back echo higher than 4dB due to inclusions or internal defects.

M.2.5. Permeability to ultrasound

Axles shall be permeable to ultrasound. This shall be verified by a recorded ultrasound test for each axle.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/289

The echo obtained on the axles under test shall have an amplitude higher than or equal to 50 % of full screen height, after
preliminary calibration of the apparatus on a standard wedge. The height of the background noise level shall be lower than
10 % of full screen height.

M.2.6. Surface characteristics

M.2.6.1. Surface finish

The axle surface shall not show any marks other than those at the positions stipulated in this Annex.

Permissible surface roughness (Ra) of finished or ready to assemble parts is given by table M4. Symbols are as shown in
figure M3.

Table M4

Designation

Symbol

Surface roughness (1) Ra (μm)

Rough –
machined

Finished or Ready for Assembly

End of the axle

Axle end and chamfer

a

Axle centre face (plain and
hollow axle)

See details R1 and R2

Journal

Journal diameter

Stress relieving grooves

Abutment

Abutment diameter

Wheelseat

Wheelseat diameter

Lead in taper

Body

Inner transitional radii to wheel-
seat

Axle body diameter

Brake disc seat diameter

Bearing seat and seal seat dia-
meter

Transitional radii between two
seats

Bore

Diameter

—

—

12,5

12,5

12,5

b

c (detail V)

d

e

f (detail U)

g (detail T)

—

12,5

12,5

l

h

j

k (detail S)

m
(detail R1)

6,3

3,2

0,8

0,8

1,6

0,8/1,6 (3)

1,6

1,6

3,2 (2)

0,8/1,6 (3)

0,8

1,6

3,2

For old axle types with plain bearing journals, the requirements are in the standards that deal with these products.

(1)
(2) 6,3 may be agreed if both the fatigue limits F1 or F2 defined in 5.5.2.1.4. and the sensitivity required for the in-service ultrasonic control

are achieved.
In-service Non Destructive Examination of axles may require smaller values of surface finish.

(3)

L 344/290

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Figure M3

Roughness symbols

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/291

M.2.6.2. Surface integrity

Surface integrity shall be determined by a magnetic particle test for all axles for the external surfaces and additionally for
hollow axles by an ultrasonic examination or an equivalent method for the bore surface. On the external surface of the axle,
transverse defects are not permissible.

M.2.6.3. Geometrical and dimensional tolerances

The required geometrical tolerances are given in table M5. Symbols used are shown in figure M4.

The required dimensional tolerances are given in table M6. Symbols used are shown in figure M5.

Table M5

Designation

Symbol

Geometrical tolerances (1) (2)(mm)

Rough –
machined

Finished or Ready
for Assembly

Journal and abutment

Journal cylindricity

Run out of the vertical face of the abutment relative to the
reference Y-Z

Run out of the abutment relative to the reference Y-Z

Wheelseat

Run out relative to the reference Y-Z

Cylindricity

Axle body

Run out relative to the reference Y-Z

Bore

Concentricity relative to the reference Y-Z

Holes for fixing axle end caps

Concentricity relative to the reference Y-Z

Machining centre run out relative to the reference Y-Z (details R1/
R2)

n

o1

o2

p

t

u

v

w1
w2

1,5

0,1

0,015

0,03

0,03

0,03

0,015

0,5

0,5

0,5

0,02
0,03

(1)
(2)

For parameters which do not have a tolerance defined in this table, the general tolerances of EN 22768-2 shall be applied.
For old axle types with plain bearing journals, the requirements are in the standards that deal with these products.

L 344/292

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Figure M4

Geometrical symbols

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/293

Table M6

Designation

Symbol

Dimensional tolerances (1)(mm)

Ready for assembly

Longitudinal sizes.

Length of axle (2)

Length of wheelseat (including collar)

Length over abutments (between reference planes)

Journal bearing seat length

Abutment length

Depth of journal groove

Length of journal groove

Diameters

Diameter of journal

Wheelseat diameter

Abutment diameter

Diameter of body

Sizes of other parts of axles

Axle machining centres

Plain axles

Hollow axles

A

B

C

D

E

G

H

I

N (3)

P

Holes for fixing axle end caps

See detail R1 (4)

Drilling concentricity

Drilling depth

Thread depth

Variation between drilling and thread

Lead in taper

Wheelseat conical length

Wheelseat taper depth

Diameter of bore

Transitional radii — wheelseat/body

K (detail U) (3)

L (detail U) (3)

O (detail R1)

± 1

0/-0,5

± 0,5 (5)

(3)

+1/0

See detail V

detail V (3)

(3)

(3)

+2/0

See detail R2 (4)

See detail R1 (4)

0,5

+2/0

+2/0

≥10

0/-3

0,1

1

See detail T (3)

For parameters which do not have a tolerance defined in this table, the general tolerances of EN 22768-2 shall be applied.

(1)
(2) Attention is drawn to the fact that compliance with tolerances over the total length ‘A’ shall not allow all the individual tolerances to be applied

cumulatively to the particular dimensions.

(3) According to the requirements of the drawing or documents accompanying the order.
(4) Other geometries may be proposed and defined in the order.
(5) Other values may be agreed for special applications.

L 344/294

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Figure M5

Dimensional symbols

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/295

M.2.7 Final protection against corrosion

M.2.7.1 General

All exposed axle surfaces shall be protected as defined by the wheelset design specification.

M.2.7.2. Resistance to specific corrosive products

The protection systems applied to the exposed axle surfaces shall consider; environmental factors, corrosive materials,
vehicle cargo, mechanical damage, etc.

L 344/296

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

ANNEX N

STRUCTURE AND MECHANICAL PARTS

Permissible stresses for static test methods

N.1 STATIC TEST METHODS

N.1.1 Limits values for static tests to verify fatigue strength

Definition of the notch cases

The limit stresses to be used for wagon body tests are indicated, for three steels with a minimum tensile resistance of 370, 420 and
570 MPa, and for five notch cases defined in a general way as follows :

— Case A: Parent metal,

— Case B: Butt weld,

— Case C: Butt weld with inertia change,

— Case D: Fillet weld,

— Case E: Projection weld.

These five notch cases do not cover the full range of structures and, in practice, it is necessary to choose the most suitable notch
case for each welded zone tested.

To facilitate and standardize these choices figures in Table Nx gives practical examples of welded joints which occur frequently in
vehicle body structures and in bogies frames.

Fig. N1

A

B

B

C

Case

Sketch

Description

Comments

Away from weld

Away from weld

Machined butt weld

Machined butt weld

Butt weld

Butt weld

Butt weld with bevelling

Machined and welded joint

Corner joint with gusset
plates

Butt weld between pieces at an
angle to each other

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/297

C

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

E

Case

Sketch

Description

Comments

Inclined joint

Corner joint

Butt weld at 90o

Reinforced plate

Lap joints

Butt welded lap joint

Corner joint

Fillet welds

Joint between tube and
straight piece

Joint between plate and tube

Joint between plate and web

Welded securing lug
Welded securing stud

L 344/298

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Table N.1

Steel (1)

Notch
case

A

B

C

D

E

2σAlim [N/mm2]

370

110

90

80

66

54

420

118

90

80

66

54

520

166

90

80

66

54

Σmlim [N/mm2]

K = 0.3

420

520

197

150

133

110

90

277

150

133

110

90

370

183

150

133

110

90

σmaxlim [N/mm2]

K = 0.3

370

238

195

173

143

117

420

258

195

173

143

117

520

360

195

173

143

117

(1) Characteristic tensile strength Rm according to material standard.
(2)

Stress is determined by the elastic limit Rp or Rp'.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/299

ANNEX O

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS

TRIV requirements

Design level for temperature class TRIV

This table specifies temperature ranges for components used on interoperable freight wagons in operation before the
implementation of this TSI.

Component

Specification

Buffers with a stroke of 105 mm

Buffers with a stroke of 130 and 150 mm

Brakes –
Regulations governing the construction of different types of
braking gear — Simple pressure receptacles of steel, not
fired, for air braking equipment and auxiliary pneumatic
equipment for railway rolling stock

Brakes –
Regulations concerning manufacture of the different brake
parts: Derailment detectors for wagons

Dimensions of hose connections (brake hoses) and electric
cables; types of pneumatic and electric connections and
their positioning on wagons and coaches equipped with
automatic couplers of the UIC and OSJD Member Railways

Technical specification for the official testing and supply of
greases intended for the lubrication of railway vehicle roller
bearing axle boxes

In the temperature-range from - 25 bis + 50 oC the technical
values must not differ more than 20 % from the value at
‘room-temperature’

In the temperature-range from - 25 bis + 50 oC the technical
values must not differ more than 20 % from the value at
‘room-temperature’.

Temperature range for pressure receptacles:
-40 oC to + 100 oC

Temperature range from - 40 oC to + 70 oC

Temperature range from - 40 oC to + 70 oC

Min. Temperature for testing: — 20 oC

L 344/300

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

ANNEX P

BRAKING PERFORMANCE

Assessment of interoperability constituents

P.1. DESIGN ASSESSMENT

The following lists contains brake system and brake constituent designs that at the time of publication are already
considered to meet the requirements of this TSI for some applications. This list will be found in Annex FF.

P.1.1. Distributor

Open point

The test procedure for product design assessment to be used for the Interoperability Constituent distributor shall conform to
this TSI.

P.1.2. Relay valve for variable load and automatic empty-load change-over

Open point

P.1.2.1. Relay valve for variable load

The design assessment of the interoperability constituent variable load relay valve is described here, whilst the specification
is described in TSI 4.2.4.1.2.2 Braking Power and 4.2.4.1.2.7 Air Supply and the features described in Annex I chapter I.2.1.

The relay shall be tested as an individual unit for the following features when operating at temperatures of - 25 to + 45 oC:

— Application & Release times over the complete load range in accordance with section 4.2.4.1.2.2 of this TSI.

— Graduable application and release of the brakes (minimum 5 steps)

— Variations in output pressure with load signal variation.

— Response time to change in load signal variation. Change within 1 minute.

— No leakage when operating at temperatures of - 25 to + 45 oC

The test results at temperatures of - 25 to + 45 oC must not affect the operation of the vehicle or the train.

The relay valve shall be tested as an individual unit for the above features when operating at extreme temperatures of - 40 to
- 25 oC and/or + 45 to + 70 oC. Test results can vary from the results between - 25 oC and + 45 oC at these extreme
temperatures, but shall not affect the ability to operate the train.

The assessment of the variable load relay valve in the system is to be carried out when fitted in a brake system having an
Interoperable Constituent distributor.

The following tests shall be carried out on an individual wagon randomly selected, equipped with at least one variable load
relay valve. The change in load shall be both rising and falling through the full range and the vehicle shall be moved before
the next set of measurements following a change in load.

— Verification of the brake mass percentages for 120 km/h running. Progressive degradation from a brake mass
percentage of 100 % to 90 % is allowed for block braked wagons as the load increases from 18 to 20 tonne axle loads
according to this TSI.

— Verification of the brake mass percentages for 100 km/h running. Progressive degradation from a brake mass
percentage of 100 % to 65 % is allowed for wagons progressively as the load increases from 65 % of the wagons
maximum permissible weight (14,5 tonne axle load for a wagon designed for 22,5 tonne axle loads) to its maximum
weight according to this TSI. The braked mass for wagons fitted with cast iron block brakes shall not exceed 18 tonnes
according to the international technical rules available at the time covering all Member States.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/301

— Application & Release times over the complete load range

— Graduable application and release of the brakes (minimum 5 steps)

— Variations in output pressure with load signal variation

— Response time to change in load signal variation

— Impact and short duration load variations not affecting load adjustment

— Leakage

Running tests shall be carried out to verify:

— The equipment is insensitive to random load variations due to the movement of the vehicle

— The brake mass percentages with (i) empty, (ii) half-loaded, (iii) load corresponding to a brake mass percentage of
100 % and (iv) full load. The brake mass percentage shall not exceed 130 %irrespective of the load value, and for block
braked wagons running at 120 km/h in the full load condition shall not exceed 105 %

P.1.2.2. Relay valve for automatic empty-load

The design assessment of the interoperability constituent automatic empty/load relay valve is described here, whilst the
specification is described in TSI 4.2.4.1.2.2 Braking Power and 4.2.4.1.2.7 Air Supply and the features described in Annex I
chapter I.2.2.

The relay will be tested as an individual unit for the following features when operating at temperatures of - 25 to + 45 oC:

— Application & Release times over the complete load range

— Graduable application and release of the brakes (minimum 5 steps)

— Variations in output pressure with load signal variation

— Response time to change in load signal variation

— No leakage when operating at temperatures of - 25 to + 45 oC

The test results at temperatures of - 25 to + 45 oC must not affect the operation of the train.

The relay valve shall be tested as an individual unit for the above features when operating at extreme temperatures of - 40 to
- 25 oC and/or + 45 to + 70 oC. Test results can vary from the results between - 25 oC and + 45 oC at these extreme
temperatures, but shall not affect the ability to operate the train.

The assessment of the automatic empty/load relay valve in the system is to be carried out when fitted in a brake system
having an Interoperable Constituent distributor. Tests shall be carried out on an individual wagon equipped with at least one
an automatic empty/load relay valve. Tests shall be carried out in the empty and loaded conditions. The vehicle will be
progressively loaded & unloaded in order to ascertain that the automatic changeover mechanism transfers from the ‘loaded’
to ‘empty’ mode, rising & falling, within the ±5 % transition weight range. Where the equipment is designed to operate with
varying load with the empty/load equipment, the running tests will be with the load at loads varied around the changeover
weight to ensure that the mechanism is not affected by random load variations during normal operation. Tests will be
carried out statically on an individual vehicle and in a train formation of a minimum of 15 wagons fitted with 4 axles which
are all fitted with Interoperable Constituent distributors. If test results conform with the above requirements, the, tests will
be carried out dynamically on an individual vehicle. Tests will include:

— Application & Release times in both modes

— Graduable application and release of the brakes (minimum 5 steps)

— Brake Application Time in both modes

— Brake Release Time in both modes

— Variations in output pressure with load signal variation

L 344/302

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

— Response time to change in load signal variation

— Leakage

Running tests may be carried out if required by the Notified Body.

P.1.3. Wheel slide protection device

Open point

The design assessment of the interoperability constituent Wheel slide protection device is described here, whilst the
specification is described in TSI 4.2.4.1.2.6 wheel slide protection and 4.2.4.1.2.7 Air Supply and the features described in
Annex I chapter I.3.

The tests with the WSP shall be carried out either on a modern 4-axle vehicle or on a validated test rig, which faithfully
represents the track geometry, adhesion conditions, vehicle parameters, etc. and validated on a modern 4-axle vehicle.

If the test vehicle is fitted with any brakes not dependent on adhesion these shall be isolated. When these brakes are
activated, the WSP shall work properly: tests are required to confirm this. The test vehicle shall have a brake system
representative of the system for which the WSP has been designed (of disc and/or block).

The following shall be measured/recorded as a minimum during all the testing of the WSP system:

— Vehicle speed

— Speed of individual axles

— Brake cylinder pressures

— Vehicle deceleration

— Auxiliary reservoir pressure

— Time

— Commencement of braking

— Activation of the dump valves

— Stopping distance

— Stopping time

The executions of the tests shall be made in accordance with this TSI.

P.1.4. Slack adjuster

The design assessment of the Interoperability Constituent slack adjuster shall be made by ensuring the mechanical strength
is suitable for the load to be transmitted. Interchangeable slack adjusters are shown in Annex I, Section I.4 with their
permitted maximum loads. The assessment will also ensure that the friction pair distance can be maintained within sensible
limits so that the friction pair do not touch each other without braking, the braking characteristics are maintained and the
braking performance is guaranteed.

A life test shall be performed to demonstrate the suitability of the unit for service on railway vehicles and to verify the
maintenance requirements for the operational design life. This shall be carried out at the maximum rated load cycling
through the full range of adjustment.

P.1.5. Brake cylinder/actuator

The design assessment of the interoperability constituent brake cylinder/actuator is described here, whilst the specification is
described in 4.2.4.1.2.2 Braking Power, 4.2.4.1.2.8 Parking Brake, 4.2.4.1.2.5 Energy Limits and 4.2.4.1.2.7 Air Supply and
the features described in Annex I chapter I.5.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/303

The mechanical strength shall be assessed to ensure that it is suitable for the mechanical load to be transmitted, mechanical
fixings and for the air pressures employed, including over pressure situations due to fault conditions. A full dimensional
check shall be carried out. Interchangeable brake cylinders are shown in Annex I, Section I.5 with their permitted
dimensions.

The brake cylinder/actuator shall be tested. The features to be tested are:

— No leakage at minimum and maximum stroke with a low input pressure (approximately 0,35 bar) for temperatures of

- 25 to + 45 oC

— No leakage at minimum and maximum stroke with a high input pressure (at least 3,8 bar) for temperatures of - 25 to

+ 45 oC

— Maximum design stroke

— Pressure required to move the load rod, at the commencement of the movement and at the point of reaching full

stroke

The test results at temperatures of - 25 to + 45 oC must not affect the operation of the train.

The brake cylinder/actuator shall be tested as an individual unit for the above features when operating at extreme
temperatures of - 40 to - 25 oC and + 45 to + 70 oC. Test results can vary from the results between - 25 oC and + 45 oC at
these extreme temperatures, but shall not affect the ability to operate the train.

If the brake cylinder or actuator has a slack adjuster, then the features listed under P.1.4 shall be assessed.

A life test shall be performed to demonstrate the suitability of the brake cylinder or actuator for service on railway vehicle
and to verify the maintenance requirements the operational design life. This shall be carried out at the maximum rated load
cycling through the full range of strokes (and range of adjustment for those fitted with slack adjusters).

P.1.6. Pneumatic half coupling

The Pneumatic half coupling shall be fully dimensionally checked to conform with the details in Annex I, section I.6, and the
manufacturers drawings. A representative sample of 10 out of a minimum batch of 25 shall be tested for coupling and to
ensure no leakage at 10 bars when operating at temperatures of –25 and + 45 oC.

The pneumatic half coupling shall be tested as an individual unit for the above features when operating at extreme
temperatures of - 40 to - 25 oC and/or + 45 to + 70 oC. Test results can vary from the results between - 25 oC and + 45 oC at
these extreme temperatures, but shall not affect the ability to operate the train.

P.1.7. End Cocks

Open point

The design assessment of the Interoperability Constituent end cocks is described here, whilst the features are described in
Annex I chapter I.7.

Check of physical and geometrical characteristics: The requirement of Annex I, I.7.4, I.7.7, and figures I.7.2 to I.7.5 as
applicable shall be checked.

The executions of the tests shall be made in accordance with this TSI.

P.1.8. Isolating device for distributor

The design assessment of the Interoperable Constituent Isolating device for distributor is described here whilst the features
are described in Annex I chapter I.8.

The Isolating device shall be tested & checked as follows:

— Movement of handle

— No leakage through the cock when closed when operating at temperatures of - 25 to + 45 oC

— No leakage from the cock to atmosphere when the cock is open or closed with a low input pressure of 0,35 bar

L 344/304

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

— No leakage from the cock to atmosphere when the cock is open or closed with a high input pressure of 7 bar

The isolating device for distributor shall be tested as an individual unit for the above features when operating at extreme
temperatures of - 40 to - 25 oC and/or + 45 to + 70 oC. Test results can vary from the results between - 25 oC and + 45 oC at
these extreme temperatures, but shall not affect the ability to operate the train.

P.1.9. Brake pads

The Test procedures for design assessment to be used for the interoperability constituents' brake pads and discs are to be
made in accordance with this TSI.

P.1.10. Brake blocks

The Test procedure for design assessment to be used for the interoperability constituent brake blocks is to be made in
accordance with the specification in Annex I section I.10.2. This specification is still an open point for composite blocks.

Composite brake blocks that are already in use have passed the assessment according to P.2.10 successfully:

UIC maintains the list of approved composite brake blocks (including geographical restrictions of use and conditions of use,
according to P.1.10 and P.2.10).

P.1.11. Accelerator valve

Open point

The Test procedures for design assessment to be used for the interoperability constituent accelerator valve are to be made in
accordance with this TSI.

P.1.12. Automatic variable load sensing and empty/load changeover device

Open point

P.1.12.1. Automatic variable load sensing device

The design assessment of the Automatic variable load sensing device is described here, whilst the features of the valve are
specified in Annex I, section I.12.1. The tests to show conformity are listed below:

— Static test of load verses output pressure with rising and falling loads.

— Running test to demonstrate that shocks or variations will not affect the output brake force.

— Running test to demonstrate that air consumption is not excessive and will not affect normal operation of the air

brake system.

The executions of the tests shall be made in accordance with this TSI.

P.1.12.2. Empty/load changeover device

The design assessment of the empty/load changeover device is described here, whilst the features of the valve are specified in
Annex I, section I.12.2. The tests to show conformity are listed below:

— Static test to show change in output with movement of the measuring device or a load change.

— Static test to show delay to output signal caused by measuring device movement, that would cause a change of output,

for greater than 3 seconds.

— Running test to demonstrate that shocks or variations will not affect the output signal.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/305

— Running test to demonstrate that air consumption is not excessive and will not affect normal operation of the air

brake system.

The executions of the tests shall be made in accordance with this TSI.

P..

PRODUCT ASSESSMENT

P.2.1. Distributor

Every Distributor shall be tested. The features are specified in Annex I, section I.1 and those to be tested are listed below:

— Graduable application and release of the brakes

— Brake Application Time

— Brake Release Time

— Manual Distributor Release Valve

— Automatic operation

— Sensitivity and Insensitivity

— Leakage

— Charging time of Brake supply (auxiliary) reservoir

— Charging time of control reservoir (may not apply to electrically/electronically controlled distributor)

P.2.2. Relay valve for variable load and empty/load

Every Relay valve shall be tested. The features are specified in Annex I, section I.2 and those to be tested are listed below:

— Graduable application and release of the brakes (minimum 5 steps)

— Brake Application Time

— Brake Release Time

— Variations in output pressure with load signal variation

— Response time to change in load signal variation

— No change in output pressure to load signal variations during an application (variable load only)

— Leakage

P.2.3. Wheel slide protection device

Every WSP control unit, sensors and dump valves shall be tested. The features of the wheel slide protection device are
described in 4.2.4.1.2.6 Wheel Slide Protection and 4.2.4.1.2.7 Air Supply and specified in Annex I, section I.3. The features
shall be tested by a self-test programme that has a fault diagnostic display to identify any faults. Random faults shall be
introduced to check the self-test.

P.2.4. Slack adjuster

Every slack adjuster shall be tested. The features to be tested are:

— Maximum take up

L 344/306

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

— Maintenance of set clearance

— Incremental take up

— Letting out when no clearance to obtain set clearance (double acting units only)

— Ability to reset to minimum length (contracting slack adjuster) or maximum length (extending slack adjuster)

P.2.5. Brake cylinder/actuator

Every Brake cylinder/actuator shall be tested. The features to be tested are:

— No leakage at minimum and maximum stroke with the low input pressure

— No leakage at minimum and maximum stroke with the high input pressure

— Maximum stroke

— Pressure to move load rod

If the brake cylinder or actuator has a slack adjuster, then the features listed under P.2.4 shall be tested.

P.2.6. Pneumatic half coupling

Every Pneumatic half coupling shall be tested to ensure no leakage at 10 bars.

P.2.7. End Cocks

Every End cock shall be tested. The features are specified in Annex I, section I.7 and those to be tested are listed below:

— Movement of handle

— Torque

— No leakage through the cock when closed

— No leakage from the cock to atmosphere when the cock is open or closed with a low input pressure.

— No leakage from the cock to atmosphere when the cock is open or closed with an input pressure of 10 bars

— Venting of hose side of cock

P.2.8. Isolating device for distributor

Every Isolating device shall be tested. The features are specified in Annex I, section I.8 and those to be tested are listed below:

— Movement of handle

— No leakage through the cock when closed

— No leakage from the cock to atmosphere when the cock is open or closed with the low input pressure.

— No leakage from the cock to atmosphere when the cock is open or closed with the high input pressure.

P.2.9. Brake pads

Samples of each batch of pads will be dimensionally checked.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/307

P.2.10. Brake blocks

— Geometrical assessment

Samples of each batch of blocks shall be dimensionally checked.

— Assessment procedure for composite brake blocks. The Test procedure is an open point

During the transitional period the assessment test performed by UIC shall at least comprise:

Rig Testing and Analysis

Composite brake blocks shall be assessed using a standardised test procedure and standardised test rig (ERRI B126/RP
18, 2. version, March 2001). The following criteria shall be examined:

— Brake block performance in dry, wet and drag braking

— Probability of metal pickup from the wheel

— Performance in adverse winter weather conditions (e.g. snow, ice, low temperature)

— Performance in the case of brake failure (brakes locked on)

— Assessment of effects on the electrical resistance of the wheelset (including specific test of compatibility with

track circuits in the different countries where the vehicle is intended to operate)

Climactic Test Chamber Assessment

Before proceeding to on-vehicle brake performance tests, the composite brake block shall successfully complete a
programme of rig testing as described above.

Brake performance tests on the subsystem:

Composite brake blocks shall be:

— assessed according to Annex S of this TSI

— proven in operational service in Northern Europe throughout one complete winter period

— assessed for wheel roughness in compliance with TSI noise

— assessed for the affects on the electrical resistance of the wheelset

Service Evaluation for new products other than composite blocks shall be conducted according to section 6 and Annex Q.

P.2.11. Accelerator valve

Every Accelerator valve shall be tested. The features are specified in Annex I, section I.11.

P.2.12. Automatic variable load sensing and empty/load changeover device

P.2.12.1. Automatic variable load sensing device

Every sensing device shall be tested. The features are specified in Annex I, section I.12.1 and those to be tested are listed
below:

— Load verses output pressure with rising and falling loads

— No leakage

L 344/308

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

P.2.12.2. Empty/load changeover device

Every changeover device shall be tested. The features are specified in Annex I, section I.12.2 and those to be tested are listed
below:

— Change in output with movement of measuring device/load change

— Delay to output signal caused by measuring device movement, which would cause a change of output, for greater than

3 seconds.

— No leakage.

P.3. TEST PROCEDURE CHARACTERISTIC

No

Characteristic

Limit Value

Test Procedure Characteristics

First stroke in percent of the maximum brake shoe
pressure for ‘goods’ brake

About 10 %

High pressure overcharge to 6 bar brake pipe pressure,
following a full service application, shall not trigger a
brake application if sustained for:-

Passenger Setting
Up to 40 seconds
Goods Setting
Up to 10 seconds

Transmission speed in the case of emergency braking

More or equal to 250 m/s

Release time of a train after a full application

Passenger Setting
Up to 25 seconds
Goods Setting
Up to 70 seconds

Uneven filling, the brake being released

6 bar for a period of 2 s. (minimum). Return
from 6 bar to 5,2 bar in 1 s.: The brake must
not operate during this test.

Inexhaustibility. Percentage of reduction in the average
pressure in the brake cylinder.

Maximum 15 %

Operation of the brake with no disturb and compliant to
this TSI: Emergency application, full application, gradual
application, adjustability on release.

Test has to be done to show no disturbance and
compliance in different braking configurations.

Automatic compensation for leakage at the brake
cylinders.

During service braking and emergency braking,
a leakage of 1 mm diameter shall be compen-
sated without delay.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/309

ANNEX Q

ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES

Interoperability Constituents

Modules for Interoperability Constituents:

— Characteristics

— Module A: Internal production control

— Module A1: Internal design control with product verification

— Module B: Type examination

— Module C: Conformity to type

— Module D: Production quality management system

— Module F: Product verification

— Module H1: Full quality management system

— Module H2: Full quality management system with design examination

— Module V: Type validation by in service experience (Suitability for use)

Characteristics

The characteristics of the interoperability constituents to be assessed in the different phases of design and production are
marked by an ‘X’ in Table Q.1.

Table Q.1

Assessment in the following phase

Design and development phase

Production
phase

Modules

Design
review

Review of
manufac-
turing pro-
cess

Type
test

In service experience
(Module V)

(Series)

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

A, H1

B + F, B + D,
H1

A, H1

A, B +C, H1

A1, H1,

B + D, B + F,
H2, V

A1, H1,

B + D, B, + F,
H2, V

A1, H1,

B+ D, B + F,
H2,V

Characteristics to be assessed

Buffers conventional

Buffers new design

Screw coupler conventional

Decals for marking

Bogie and running gear con-
ventional

Bogie and running gear new
design

Wheelsets conventional

Wheelsets new design

Wheels conventional

Wheels new

L 344/310

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Characteristics to be assessed

Axles conventional

Axles new

Roller bearings conventional

Roller bearings new

Distributor valve (1)

Relay valve for variable load (1)

Wheel slide protection device (1)

Slack adjuster (1)

Brake cylinder/actuator (1)

Relay valve for automatic empty-
load change-over (1)

Pneumatic half coupling (1)

End cock (1)

Isolating device for distributor
valve (1)

Brake pad and disk (1)

Brake blocs (1)

Brake pipe emptying accelerator
valve (1)

Automatic variable load sensing
(1)

Empty/load change-over device
(1)

Assessment in the following phase

Design and development phase

Production
phase

Modules

Design
review

Review of
manufac-
turing pro-
cess

Type
test

In service experience
(Module V)

(Series)

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

12 Month after
an
modifying
existing model or
24 Month
for
other cases

12 Month

12 Month

12 Month

12 Month

12 Month

12 Month

12 Month

12 Month

18 Month

18 Month

12 Month

12 Month

12 Month

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

A1, H1,

B + D, B + F,
H2, V

A1, H1,

B + D, B + F,
H2

B+D,
H2, V (2)

B+F,

B+D,
H2, V (2)

B+F,

B+D,
H2, V (2)

B+F,

B+D,
H2, V (2)

B+F,

B+D,
H2, V (2)

B+F,

B+D,
H2, V (2)

B+F,

B+D,
H2, V (2)

B+F,

B+D,
H2, V (2)

B+F,

B+D,
H2, V (2)

B+F,

B+D,
H2, V (2)

B+F,

B+D,
H2, V (2)

B+F,

B+D,
H2, V (2)

B+F,

B+D,
H2, V (2)

B+F,

B+D,
H2, V (2)

B+F,

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

(1)

For an IC already admitted, the assessment is limited to the ‘integration test’ when installed on the subsystem (new wagon) and ‘Series’
test during the production phase.

(2) When a result from one module is relevant for an other module, it is not necessary to repeat the test.
(3) The assessment of the manufacturing process is not necessary for a new IC, or for a different kind of IC, if there is little or no difference to

an existing assessed manufacturing process, for example a distributor and empty/load change-over device.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/311

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

MODULES FOR INTEROPERABILITY CONSTITUENTS

Module A: Internal Production Control

This module describes the procedure whereby the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the
Community, who carries out the obligations laid down in point 2, ensures and declares that the interoperability
constituent concerned satisfies the requirements of the TSI that apply to it.

The manufacturer must establish the technical documentation described in point 3.

The technical documentation must enable the conformity of the interoperability constituent with the requirements of
the TSI to be assessed. It must, as far as relevant for such assessment, cover the design, manufacture, maintenance and
operation of the interoperability constituent.So far as relevant for the assessment, the documentation must contain:

— a general description of the interoperability constituent

— conceptual design and manufacturing information,

for example drawings and schemes of components,

subassemblies, circuits, etc.

— descriptions and explanations necessary for the understanding of the design and manufacturing information,

maintenance and the operation of the interoperability constituent

— the technical specifications including European specifications (1) with relevant clauses, applied in full or in part,

— description of the solutions adopted to meet the requirements of the TSI, where the European specifications

have not been applied in full,

— results of design calculations made, examinations carried out, etc,

— test reports.

The manufacturer must take all the measures necessary in order that the manufacturing process ensures compliance of
each manufactured interoperability constituent with the technical documentation referenced in point 3 and with the
requirements of the TSI that apply to it.

The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community must draw up a written
declaration of conformity for the interoperability constituent. The content of this declaration has to include at least the
information indicated in Annex IV (3) and in Article 13 -3 of Directives 01/16/EC. The EC declaration of conformity
and the accompanying documents must be dated and signed. The declaration must be written in the same language as
the technical documentation and must contain the following:

— the Directive references (Directives 01/16/EC and other directives to which the interoperability constituent may

be subject),

— the name and address of the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community
(give trade name and full address and in the case of an authorised representative also give the trade name of the
manufacturer or constructor),

— description of interoperability constituent (make, type etc.)

— description of the procedure (module) followed in order to declare conformity,

— all the relevant descriptions met by the interoperability constituent and in particular its conditions of use,

— reference to this TSI and to any other applicable TSI, and where appropriate reference to European

specifications,

— identification of the signatory empowered to enter into commitments on behalf of the manufacturer or of his

authorised representative established within the Community.

(1) The definition of an European specification is indicated in the directives 96/48/EC and 01/16/EC. The guide for application of HS TSIs

explains the way to use the European Specifications

L 344/312

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

6.

7.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

The manufacturer or his authorised representative must keep a copy of the EC declaration of conformity with the
technical documentation for a period of 10 years after the last interoperability constituent has been manufactured.
Where neither the manufacturer nor his authorised representative is established within the Community, the obligation
to keep the technical documentation available is the responsibility of the person who places the interoperability
constituent in the Community market.

If additional to the EC declaration of conformity, an EC declaration for suitability for use for the interoperability
constituent is required by the TSI, this declaration has to be added after being issued by the manufacturer under the
conditions of module V.

MODULES FOR INTEROPERABILITY CONSTITUENTS

Module A1: Internal Design Control with Production Verification

This module describes the procedure whereby the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the
Community, who carries out the obligations laid down in point 2, ensures and declares that the interoperability
constituent concerned satisfies the requirements of the TSI that apply to it.

The manufacturer must establish the technical documentation described in point 3.

The technical documentation must enable the conformity of the interoperability constituent with the requirements of
the TSI to be assessed. The technical documentation must also give evidence that the design of the interoperability
constituent, already accepted before the implementation of the present TSI, is in accordance with the TSI and that the
interoperability constituent has been used in service in the same area of use. It must, as far as relevant for such
assessment, cover the design, manufacture, maintenance and operation of the interoperability constituent. So far as
relevant for the assessment, the documentation must contain:

— a general description of the interoperability constituent and its conditions of use,

— conceptual design and manufacturing information,

for example drawings and schemes of components,

subassemblies, circuits, etc.

— descriptions and explanations necessary for the understanding of the design and manufacturing information,

maintenance and the operation of the interoperability constituent,

— the technical specifications including European specifications (1) with relevant clauses, applied in full or in part,

— descriptions of the solutions adopted to meet the requirements of the TSI, where the European specifications

referenced to in the TSI have not been applied in full,

— results of design calculations made, examinations carried out, etc,

— test reports,

The manufacturer must take all the measures necessary in order that the manufacturing process ensures compliance of
each manufactured interoperability constituent with the technical documentation referenced in point 3 and with the
requirements of the TSI that apply to it.

The notified body, chosen by the manufacturer, must carry out the appropriate examinations and tests in order to
verify the conformity of the manufactured interoperability constituents with the technical documentation referenced
in point 3 and with the requirement of the TSI. The manufacturer (2) can choose one of the following procedures:

5.1. Verification by examination and testing of every interoperability constituent

5.1.1. Each product shall be individually examined and appropriate tests shall be carried out in order to verify the product
conformity with the technical documentation and the requirements of the TSI that apply to it. When a test is not set
out in the TSI (or in an European Standard quoted in the TSI), the relevant European Specifications or equivalent tests
are applicable

5.1.2. The notified body must draw up a written certificate of conformity for the approved products relating to the tests

carried out.

(1) The definition of an European specification is indicated in the directives 96/48/EC and 01/16/EC. The guide for application of HS TSIs

explains the way to use the European Specifications

(2) When necessary, the manufacturer's discretion may be limited for specific constituents. In this case, the relevant verification process

required for the interoperability constituent is specified in the TSI (or in its annexes)

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/313

5.2. Statistical verification

5.2.1. The manufacturer must present his interoperability constituents in the form of homogeneous lots and shall take all
measures necessary in order that the manufacturing process ensures the homogeneity of each lot produced.

5.2.2. All interoperability constituents must be available for verification in the form of homogeneous lots. A random
sample shall be drawn from each lot. Each interoperability constituents in a sample shall be individually examined and
appropriate tests shall be carried out to ensure the product conformity with the technical documentation and the
requirements of the TSI which apply to it and to determine whether the lot is accepted or rejected. When a test is not
set out in the TSI (or in an European Standard quoted in the TSI), the relevant European Specifications or equivalent
tests are applicable

5.2.3. The statistical procedure must use appropriate elements (statistical method, sampling plan etc), depending on the

characteristics to be assessed, as specified in the TSI.

5.2.4. In the case of accepted lots, the notified body shall draw up a written certificate of conformity relating to the tests
carried out. All interoperability constituents in the lot may be placed on the market except those interoperability
constituents from the sample, which were found not to be in conformity.

5.2.5. If a lot is rejected, the notified body or the competent authority must take appropriate measures to prevent placing
that lot on the market. In the event of frequent rejection of lots the notified body may suspend the statistical
verification.

6.

The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community must draw up the EC declaration
of conformity of the interoperability constituent. The content of this declaration shall include at least the information
indicated in Annex IV (3) of Directives 96/48/EC or 01/16/EC. The EC declaration of conformity and the
accompanying documents must be dated and signed. The declaration must be written in the same language as the
technical documentation and must contain the following:

— the Directive references (Directives 96/48/EC or 01/16/EC and other directives to which the interoperability

constituent may be subject),

— the name and address of the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community
(give trade name and full address and in the case of an authorised representative also give the trade name of the
manufacturer or constructor),

— description of interoperability constituent (make, type, etc)

— description of the procedure (module) followed in order to declare conformity,

— all of the relevant descriptions met by the interoperability constituent and in particular any conditions of use,

— name and address of notified body (bodies) involved in the procedure followed in respect of conformity and date

of certificates together with the duration and conditions of validity of the certificates,

— reference to the TSI and any other applicable TSI and where appropriate reference to European specifications,

— identification of the signatory empowered to enter into commitments on behalf of the manufacturer or of his

authorised representative established within the Community.

The certificate to be referred to is the certificate of conformity as mentioned in point 5. The manufacturer or his
authorised representative established within the Community must ensure that he is able to supply the notified body's
certificates of conformity on request

The manufacturer or his authorised representative must keep a copy of the EC declaration of conformity with the
technical documentation for a period of 10 years after the last interoperability constituent has been manufactured.
Where neither the manufacturer nor his authorised representative is established within the Community, the obligation
to keep the technical documentation available is the responsibility of the person who places the interoperability
constituent in the Community market.

If additional to the EC declaration of conformity, an EC declaration for suitability for use for the interoperability
constituent is required by the TSI, this declaration has to be added after being issued by the manufacturer under the
conditions of module V.

7.

8.

L 344/314

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

MODULES FOR INTEROPERABILITY CONSTITUENTS

Module B: Type Examination

1.

2.

This module describes that part of the procedure by which a notified body ascertains and attests that a type,
representative of the production envisaged, meets the provisions of the TSI that apply to it.

The application for the EC type-examination must be lodged by the manufacturer or his authorised representative
established within the Community. The application must include:

— the name and address of the manufacturer and also, if the application is lodged by the authorised representative,

his name and address ,

— a written declaration that the same application has not been lodged with any other notified body,

— the technical documentation, as described in point 3.

The applicant must place at the disposal of the notified body a specimen, representative of the production envisaged
and hereinafter called “type“.

A type may cover several versions of the Interoperability Constituent provided that the differences between the
versions do not affect the provisions of the TSI.

The notified body may request further specimens if needed for carrying out the test programme.

If no type tests are requested within the type examination procedure, and the type is sufficiently defined by the
technical documentation, as described in point 3, the notified body may agree that no specimens are placed at its
disposal.

3.

The technical documentation must enable the conformity of the interoperability constituent with the requirements of
the TSI to be assessed. It must, as far as relevant for such assessment, cover the design, manufacture, maintenance and
operation of the interoperability constituent.

The technical documentation must contain:

— a general type-description,

— conceptual design and manufacturing information, for example drawings and schemes of components, sub-

assemblies, circuits, etc.,

— descriptions and explanations necessary for the understanding of the design and manufacturing information,

maintenance and the operation of the interoperability constituent,

— conditions of integration of the interoperability constituent in its system environment (sub-assembly, assembly,

subsystem) and the necessary interface conditions,

— conditions for use and maintenance of the interoperability constituent (restrictions of running time or distance,

wear limits etc),

— the technical specifications, including European specifications (1) with relevant clauses, applied in full or in part,

— descriptions of the solutions adopted to meet the requirements of the TSI in cases where the European

specifications have not been applied in full,

— results of design calculations made, examinations carried out, etc.,

— test reports,

4.

The notified body must:

4.1.

examine the technical documentation,

(1) The definition of an European specification is indicated in the directives 96/48/EC and 01/16/EC. The guide for application of HS TSIs

explains the way to use the European Specifications

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/315

4.2. verify that any specimen(s) required for test has (have) been manufactured in conformity with the technical
documentation, and carry out or have carried out the type tests in accordance with the provisions of the TSI and/or
the relevant European specifications,

4.3. where a design review is requested in the TSI, perform an examination of the design methods, the design tools and the
design results to evaluate their capability to fulfil the requirements for conformity for the interoperability constituent
at the completion of the design process,

4.4. where a review of the manufacturing process is requested in the TSI, perform an examination of the manufacturing
process devised for manufacturing the interoperability constituent, to evaluate its contribution to product conformity,
and/or examine the review carried out by the manufacturer at the completion of the design process,

4.5.

identify the elements which have been designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the TSI and the
European specifications as well as the elements which have been designed without applying the relevant provisions of
those European Specifications;

4.6. perform or have performed the appropriate examinations and necessary tests in accordance with points 4.2., 4.3. and
4.4 to establish whether, where the manufacturer has chosen to apply the relevant European specifications, these have
actually been applied;

4.7. perform or have performed the appropriate examinations and necessary tests in accordance with points 4.2., 4.3. and
4.4. to establish whether, where the relevant European specifications have not been applied, the solutions adopted by
the manufacturer meet the requirements of the TSI;

4.8.

agree with the applicant the location where the examinations and necessary tests will be carried out.

5. Where the type meets the provisions of the TSI, the notified body must issue a type-examination certificate to the
applicant. The certificate must contain the name and address of the manufacturer, conclusions of the examination,
conditions for its validity and the necessary data for identification of the approved type.

The time period of validity shall be no longer than 5 years.

A list of the relevant parts of the technical documentation must be annexed to the certificate and a copy kept by the
notified body.

If the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community is denied a type-examination
certificate, the notified body must provide detailed reasons for such denial.

Provision must be made for an appeals procedure.

6.

7.

8.

9.

The applicant must inform the notified body that holds the technical documentation concerning the type-examination
certificate of all modifications to the approved product which must receive additional approval where such changes
may affect the conformity with the requirements of the TSI or the prescribed conditions for use of the product. In this
case, the notified body shall perform only those examinations and tests that are relevant and necessary to the changes.
The additional approval may be given either in the form of an addition to the original type-examination certificate, or,
by the issue of a new certificate after withdrawal of the old one.

If no modifications as in point 6 have been made, the validity of an expiring certificate can be extended for another
period of validity. The applicant will apply for such a prolongation by a written confirmation that no such
modifications have been made, and the notified body issues a prolongation for another period of validity as in point 5,
if no contrary information exists. This procedure can be reiterated.

Each notified body must communicate to the other notified bodies the relevant information concerning the type-
examination certificates and additions issued, withdrawn or refused.

The other notified bodies may receive, on request, copies of the type-examination certificates issued and/or their
additions. The annexes to the certificates (see § 5) must be kept at the disposal of the other notified bodies.

10.

The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community must keep with the technical
documentation copies of type-examination certificates and their additions for a period of 10 years after the last
interoperability constituent has been manufactured. Where neither the manufacturer nor his authorised representative
is established within the Community, the obligation to keep the technical documentation available is the responsibility
of the person who places the interoperability constituent on the Community market.

L 344/316

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

MODULES FOR INTEROPERABILITY CONSTITUENTS

Module C: Conformity to Type

1.

2.

3.

This module describes that part of the procedure whereby the manufacturer or his authorised representative
established within the Community ensures and declares that the interoperability constituent concerned is in
conformity with the type as described in the type-examination certificate and satisfies the requirements of the TSI that
apply to it.

The manufacturer must take all measures necessary to ensure that the manufacturing process ensures compliance of
each manufactured interoperability constituent with the type as described in the EC type examination certificate and
with the requirements of the TSI that apply to it.

The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community must draw up an EC declaration
of conformity for the interoperability constituent.

The content of this declaration has to include at least the information indicated in Annex IV (3) of Directives 96/48/EC
or 01/16/EC.The EC declaration of conformity and the accompanying documents must be dated and signed.

The declaration must be written in the same language as the technical documentation and must contain the following:

— the Directive references (Directives 96/48/EC or 01/16/EC and other directives to which the interoperability

constituent may be subject),

— the name and address of the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community
(give trade name and full address and in the case of an authorised representative also give the trade name of the
manufacturer or constructor),

— description of interoperability constituent (make, type etc.)

— description of the procedure (module) followed in order to declare conformity,

— all the relevant descriptions met by the interoperability constituent and in particular its conditions of use,

— name and address of notified body (bodies) involved in the procedure followed in respect of type examination
conformity and date of the EC type examination certificate (and its additions) together with the duration and
conditions of validity of the certificate,

— reference to the TSI and to any other applicable TSI, and where appropriate reference to European

specifications (1),

— identification of the signatory empowered to enter into commitments on behalf of the manufacturer or of his

authorised representative established within the Community.

4.

The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community must keep a copy of the EC
declaration of conformity for a period of 10 years after the last interoperability constituent has been manufactured.

Where neither the manufacturer nor his authorised representative is established within the Community, the obligation
to keep the technical documentation available is the responsibility of the person who places the interoperability
constituent on the Community market.

5.

If additional to the EC declaration of conformity an EC declaration of suitability for use for the interoperability
constituent is required by the TSI, this declaration has to be added after being issued by the manufacturer under the
conditions of module V.

(1) The definition of an European specification is indicated in the directives 96/48/EC and 01/16/EC. The guide for application of HS TSIs

explains the way to use the European Specifications

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/317

MODULES FOR INTEROPERABILITY CONSTITUENTS

Module D: Production Quality Management System

1.

2.

This module describes the procedure whereby the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the
Community who satisfies the obligations of point 2 ensures and declares that the interoperability constituent
concerned is in conformity with the type as described in the type-examination certificate and satisfies the
requirements of the TSI that apply to it.

The manufacturer must operate an approved quality management system for production, final product inspection and
testing as specified in point 3 and is subject to monitoring as specified in point. 4.

3.

Quality management system

3.1. The manufacturer must lodge an application for assessment of his quality management system with a notified body of

his choice, for the interoperability constituents concerned.

The application must include:

— all relevant information for the product category representative for the interoperability constituents envisaged,

— the documentation concerning the quality management system,

— the technical documentation of the approved type and a copy of the type-examination certificate, issued after

the completion of the type examination procedure of module B.

— a written declaration that the same application has not been lodged with any other notified body,

3.2. The quality management system must ensure compliance of the interoperability constituents with the type as
described in the type-examination certificate and with the requirements of the TSI that apply to them. All the
elements, requirements and provisions adopted by the manufacturer shall be documented in a systematic and orderly
manner in the form of written policies, procedures and instructions. The quality management system documentation
must permit a consistent interpretation of the quality programmes, plan, manuals and records.

It must contain in particular an adequate description of:

— the quality objectives and the organisational structure,

— responsibilities and powers of the management with regard to product quality,

— the manufacturing, quality control and quality management techniques, processes and systematic actions that

will be used,

— the examinations, checks and tests that will be carried out before, during and after manufacture, and the

frequency with which they will be undertaken,

— the quality records, such as inspection reports and test data, calibration data, qualification reports of the

personnel concerned, etc.,

— the means to monitor the achievement of the required product quality and the effective operation of the quality

management system.

3.3. The notified body assesses the quality management system to determine whether it satisfies the requirements of point
3.2. It presumes compliance with these requirements if the manufacturer implements a quality system for production,
final product inspection and testing in respect of the Standard EN/ISO 9001- 2000, which take into consideration the
specificity of the interoperability constituent for which it is implemented.

When the manufacturer operates a certified quality management system, the notified body shall take this into account
in the assessment.

The audit must be specific for the product category, which is representative for the interoperability constituent. The
auditing team must have at least one member experienced as an assessor in the product technology concerned. The
evaluation procedure must include an inspection visit to the manufacturer's premises.

L 344/318

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

The decision must be notified to the manufacturer. The notification must contain the conclusions of the examination
and the reasoned assessment decision.

3.4. The manufacturer must undertake to fulfil the obligations arising out of the quality management system as approved

and to uphold it so that it remains adequate and efficient.

The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community shall keep the notified body that
has approved the quality management system informed of any intended updating of the quality management system.

The notified body must evaluate the modifications proposed and decide whether the amended quality management
system will still satisfy the requirements of point 3.2 or whether a re-assessment is required.

It must notify its decision to the manufacturer. The notification must contain the conclusions of the examination and
the reasoned assessment decision.

4.

Surveillance of the quality management system under the responsibility of the notified body.

4.1. The purpose of surveillance is to make sure that the manufacturer duly fulfils the obligations arising out of the

approved quality management system.

4.2. The manufacturer must allow the notified body entrance for inspection purposes to the locations of manufacture,

inspection and testing, and storage and must provide it with all necessary information, in particular:

— the quality management system documentation,

— the quality records such as inspection reports and tests data, calibration data, qualification reports of the

personnel concerned, etc.

4.3. The notified body must periodically carry out audits to make sure that the manufacturer maintains and applies the

quality management system and must provide an audit report to the manufacturer.

The frequency of the audits shall be at least once a year.

When the manufacturer operate a certified quality management system, the notified body shall take this into account
in the surveillance.

4.4. Additionally the notified body may pay unexpected visits to the manufacturer. During such visits the notified body
may carry out, or cause to be carried out, tests to verify that the quality management system is functioning correctly, if
necessary. The notified body must provide the manufacturer with a visit report and, if a test has taken place, with a test
report.

5.

Each notified body must communicate to the other notified bodies the relevant information concerning the quality
management system approvals, issued, withdrawn or refused.

The other notified bodies may receive on request copies of the quality management system approvals issued.

6.

The manufacturer must, for a period of 10 years after the last product has been manufactured, keep at the disposal of
the national authorities:

— the documentation referenced to in the second indent of point 3.1,

— the updating referenced to in the second paragraph of point 3.4,

— the decisions and reports from the notified body in the final paragraph of points 3.4, 4.3 and 4.4.

7.

The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community must draw up the EC declaration
of conformity of the interoperability constituent.

The content of this declaration shall include at least the information indicated in Annex IV (3) of Directives 96/48/EC
or 01/16/EC. The EC declaration of conformity and the accompanying documents must be dated and signed.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/319

The declaration must be written in the same language as the technical documentation and must contain the following:

— the Directive references (Directives 96/48/EC or 01/16/EC and other directives to which the interoperability

constituent may be subject),

— the name and address of the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community
(give trade name and full address and in the case of an authorised representative also give the trade name of the
manufacturer or constructor),

— description of the interoperability constituent (make, type, etc)

— description of the procedure (module) followed in order to declare conformity,

— all of the relevant descriptions met by the interoperability constituent and in particular any conditions of use,

— name and address of notified body (bodies) involved in the procedure followed in respect of conformity and date

of certificates together with the duration and conditions of validity of the certificates,

— reference to the TSI and any other applicable TSI and where appropriate reference to European specification (1),

— identification of the signatory empowered to enter into commitments on behalf of the manufacturer or of his

authorised representative established within the Community.

The certificates to be referred to are:

— the quality management system approval indicated in point 3,

— the type-examination certificate and its additions,

8.

The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community must keep a copy of the EC
declaration of conformity for a period of 10 years after the last interoperability constituent has been manufactured.

Where neither the manufacturer nor his authorised representative is established within the Community, the obligation
to keep the technical documentation available is the responsibility of the person who places the interoperability
constituent on the Community market.

9.

If additional to the EC declaration of conformity an EC declaration of suitability for use for the interoperability
constituent is requested in the TSI, this declaration has to be added, after being issued by the manufacturer under the
conditions of Module V.

4 MODULES FOR INTEROPERABILITY CONSTITUENTS

Module F: Product Verification

1.

2.

3.

This module describes the procedure whereby a manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the
Community checks and attests that the interoperability constituent concerned and subject to the provisions of point 3
is in conformity with the type as described in the EC type examination certificate and satisfies the requirements of the
TSI that apply to it.

The manufacturer must take all measures necessary in order that the manufacturing process ensures conformity of
each interoperability constituents with the type as described in the type-examination certificate and with the
requirements of the TSI that apply to it.

The notified body must carry out the appropriate examinations and tests in order to check the conformity of the
interoperability constituent with the type as described in the EC type examination certificate and with the
requirements of the TSI. The manufacturer (2) can choose either an examination and testing of every interoperability
constituent as specified in point 4 or an examination and testing of interoperability constituents on a statistical basis,
as specified in point 5.

(1) The definition of an European specification is indicated in the directives 96/48/EC and 01/16/EC. The guide for application of HS TSIs

explains the way to use the European Specifications

(2) The manufacturer's discretion may be limited in specific TSIs

L 344/320

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

4.

Verification by examination and testing of every interoperability constituent

4.1. Each product shall be individually examined and appropriate tests shall be carried out in order to verify the product
conformity with the type as described in the type-examination certificate and with the requirements of the TSI that
apply to it. When a test is not set out in the TSI, (or in an European Standard quoted in the TSI), the relevant European
Specifications (1), or equivalent tests are applicable.

4.2. The notified body must draw up a written certificate of conformity for the approved products relating to the tests

carried out.

4.3. The manufacturer or his authorised representative must ensure that he is able to supply the notified body's certificates

of conformity on request.

5.

Statistical verification

5.1. The manufacturer must present his interoperability constituents in the form of homogeneous lots and shall take all
measures necessary in order that the manufacturing process ensures the homogeneity of each lot produced.

5.2. All interoperability constituents must be available for verification in the form of homogeneous lots. A random sample
shall be drawn from each lot. Each interoperability constituents in a sample shall be individually examined and
appropriate tests shall be carried out to ensure the product conformity with the type as described in the type-
examination certificate and with the requirements of the TSI which apply to it and to determine whether the lot is
accepted or rejected. When a test is not set out in the TSI (or in an European Standard quoted in the TSI), the relevant
European Specifications or equivalent tests are applicable..

5.3. The statistical procedure must use appropriate elements (statistical method, sampling plan etc), depending on the

characteristics to be assessed, as specified in the TSI.

5.4.

In the case of accepted lots, the notified body shall draw up a written certificate of conformity relating to the tests
carried out. All interoperability constituents in the lot may be placed on the market except those interoperability
constituents from the sample, which were found not to be in conformity.

If a lot is rejected, the notified body or the competent authority must take appropriate measures to prevent placing of
that lot on the market. In the event of frequent rejection of lots the notified body may suspend the statistical
verification.

5.5. The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community must ensure that he is able to

supply the notified body's certificates of conformity on request.

6.

The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community must draw up the EC declaration
of conformity of the interoperability constituent.

The content of this declaration shall include at least the information indicated in Annex IV (3) of Directives 96/48/EC
or 01/16/EC. The EC declaration of conformity and the accompanying documents must be dated and signed.

The declaration must be written in the same language as the technical documentation and must contain the following:

— the Directive references (Directives 96/48/EC or 01/16/EC and other directives to which the interoperability

constituent may be subject),

— the name and address of the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community
(give trade name and full address and in the case of an authorised representative also give the trade name of the
manufacturer or constructor),

— description of interoperability constituent (make, type, etc)

— description of the procedure (module) followed in order to declare conformity,

— all of the relevant descriptions met by the interoperability constituent and in particular any conditions of use,

— name and address of notified body (bodies) involved in the procedure followed in respect of conformity and date

of certificates together with the duration and conditions of validity of the certificates,

(1) The definition of an European specification is indicated in the directives 96/48/EC and 01/16/EC. The guide for application of HS TSIs

explains the way to use the European Specifications

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/321

— reference to the TSI and any other applicable TSI and where appropriate reference to European specifications,

— identification of the signatory empowered to enter into commitments on behalf of the manufacturer or of his

authorised representative established within the Community.

The certificates to be referred to are:

— the type-examination certificate and its additions,

— the certificate of conformity as mentioned in points 4 or 5.

7.

The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community must keep a copy of the EC
declaration of conformity for a period of 10 years after the last interoperability constituent has been manufactured.

Where neither the manufacturer nor his authorised representative is established within the Community, the obligation
to keep the technical documentation available is the responsibility of the person who places the interoperability
constituent on the Community market.

8.

If additional to the EC declaration of conformity an EC declaration of suitability for use for the interoperability
constituent is requested in the TSI, this declaration has to be added, after being issued by the manufacturer under the
conditions of Module V.

MODULES FOR INTEROPERABILITY CONSTITUENTS

Module H 1: Full Quality Management System

1.

2.

This module describes the procedure whereby the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the
Community who satisfies the obligations of point 2, ensures and declares that the interoperability constituent
concerned satisfies the requirements of the TSI that apply to it.

The manufacturer must operate an approved quality management system for design, production and final product
inspection and testing as specified in point 3 and shall be subject to surveillance as specified in point. 4.

3.

Quality management system

3.1. The manufacturer must lodge an application for assessment of his quality management system with a notified body of

his choice, for the interoperability constituents concerned.

The application must include:

— all relevant information for the product category representative for the interoperability constituent envisaged,

— the quality management system's documentation.

— a written declaration that the same application has not been lodged with any other notified body,

3.2. The quality management system must ensure compliance of the interoperability constituent with the requirements of
the TSI that apply to it. All the elements, requirements and provisions adopted by the manufacturer must be
documented in a systematic and orderly manner in the form of written policies, procedures and instructions. This
quality management system documentation shall ensure a common understanding of the quality policies and
procedures such as quality programmes, plans, manuals and records.

It must contain in particular an adequate description of:

— the quality objectives and the organisational structure,

— responsibilities and powers of the management with regard to design and product quality,

L 344/322

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

— the technical design specifications, including European specifications (1), that will be applied, and, where the
European specifications will not be applied in full, the means that will be used to ensure that the requirements of
the TSI that apply to the interoperability constituent will be met,

— the design control and design verification techniques, processes and systematic actions that will be used when

designing the interoperability constituents pertaining to the product category covered,

— the corresponding manufacturing, quality control and quality management system techniques, processes and

systematic actions that will be used,

— the examinations, checks and tests that will be carried out before, during and after manufacture, and the

frequency with which they will be undertaken,

— the quality records, such as inspection reports and test data, calibration data, qualification reports of the

personnel concerned, etc.,

— the means to monitor the achievement of the required design and product quality and the effective operation of

the quality management system.

The quality policies and procedures shall cover in particular the assessment phases as design review, review of
manufacturing process and type tests, as they are specified in the TSI,
for the different characteristics and
performances of the interoperability constituent.

3.3. The notified body must assess the quality management system to determine whether it satisfies the requirements of
point 3.2. It presumes compliance with these requirements if the manufacturer implements a quality system for
design, production, final product inspection and testing in respect of the Standard EN/ISO 9001- 2000, which take
into consideration the specificity of the interoperability constituent for which it is implemented.

When the manufacturer operates a certified quality management system, the notified body shall take this into account
in the assessment.

The audit must be specific for the product category, which is representative for the interoperability constituent. The
auditing team must have at least one member experienced as an assessor in the product technology concerned. The
evaluation procedure shall include an assessment visit to the manufacturer's premises.

The decision must be notified to the manufacturer. The notification must contain the conclusions of the examination
and the reasoned assessment decision.

3.4. The manufacturer must undertake to fulfil the obligations arising out of the quality management system as approved

and to uphold it so that it remains adequate and efficient.

The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community shall keep the notified body that
has approved the quality management system informed of any intended updating of the quality management system.

The notified body must evaluate the modifications proposed and decide whether the amended quality management
system will still satisfy the requirements of point 3.2 or whether a re-assessment is required.

It must notify its decision to the manufacturer. The notification shall contain the conclusions of the evaluation and the
reasoned assessment decision.

4.

Surveillance of the quality management system under the responsibility of the notified body

4.1. The purpose of surveillance is to make sure that the manufacturer duly fulfils the obligations arising out of the

approved quality management system.

4.2. The manufacturer must allow the notified body entrance for inspection purposes to the locations of design,
manufacture, inspection and testing, and storage, and shall provide it with all necessary information, including
particular:

— the quality management system documentation,

(1) The definition of an European specification is indicated in the directives 96/48/EC and 01/16/EC. The guide for application of HS TSIs

explains the way to use the European Specifications

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/323

— the quality records as foreseen by the design part of the quality management system, such as results of analyses,

calculations, tests, etc.,

— the quality records as foreseen by the manufacturing part of the quality management system, such as inspection

reports and test data, calibration data, qualification reports of the personnel concerned, etc.

4.3. The notified body must periodically carry out audits to make sure that the manufacturer maintains and applies the
quality management system and shall provide an audit report to the manufacturer. When the manufacturer operates a
certified quality management system, the notified body shall take this into account in the surveillance. The frequency
of the audits shall be at least once a year.

4.4. Additionally the notified body may pay unexpected visits to the manufacturer. At the time of such visits, the notified
body may carry out tests or have them carried out in order to check the proper functioning of the quality
management system where necessary. It must provide the manufacturer with a visit report and, if a test has been
carried out, with a test report.

5.

The manufacturer must, for a period of 10 years after the last product has been manufactured, keep at the disposal of
the national authorities:

— the documentation referenced to in the second indent of the second subparagraph of point 3.1,

— the updating referenced in the second subparagraph of point 3.4,

— the decisions and reports from the notified body in the final subparagraph of points 3.4, 4.3 and 4.4.

6.

Each notified body must communicate to the other notified bodies the relevant information concerning the quality
management system approvals issued, withdrawn or refused.

The other notified bodies may receive on request copies of the quality management system approvals and additional
approvals issued.

7.

The manufacturer or its authorised representative established within the Community must draw up the EC Declaration
of conformity of the interoperability constituent. The content of this declaration shall include at least the information
indicated in Annex IV (3) of Directives 96/48/EC or 01/16/EC. The EC declaration of conformity and the
accompanying documents must be dated and signed.

The declaration must be written in the same language as the technical documentation and must contain the following:

— the Directive references (Directives 96/48/EC or 01/16/EC and other directives to which the interoperability

constituent may be subject)

— the name and address of the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community
(give trade name and full address and in the case of an authorised representative also give the trade name of the
manufacturer or constructor),

— description of interoperability constituent (make, type, etc)

— description of the procedure (module) followed in order to declare conformity,

— all of the relevant descriptions met by the interoperability constituent and in particular its conditions of use,

— name and address of notified body (bodies) involved in the procedure followed in respect of conformity, and

date of certificate together with the duration and conditions of validity of the certificate,

— reference to the TSI and to any other applicable TSI and where appropriate to European specifications,

— identification of the signatory empowered to enter into commitments on behalf of the manufacturer or of his

authorised representative established within the Community.

The certificate to be referred to is:

— the Quality management system approvals indicated in point 3.

L 344/324

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

8.

The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community must keep a copy of the EC
declaration of conformity for a period of 10 years after the last interoperability constituent has been manufactured.

Where neither the manufacturer nor his authorised representative is established within the Community, the obligation
to keep the technical documentation available is the responsibility of the person who places the interoperability
constituent on the Community market.

9.

If additional to the EC declaration of conformity an EC declaration of suitability for use for the interoperability
constituent is requested in the TSI, this declaration has to be added, after being issued by the manufacturer under the
conditions of Module V.

MODULES FOR INTEROPERABILITY CONSTITUENTS

Module H2: Full Quality Management System With Design Examination

1.

2.

This module describes the procedure whereby a notified body carries out an examination of the design of an
interoperability constituent and the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community
who satisfies the obligations of point 2 ensures and declares that the interoperability constituent concerned satisfies
the requirements of the TSI that apply to it.

The manufacturer must operate an approved quality management system for design, production and final product
inspection and testing as specified in point 3 and shall be subject to surveillance as specified in point. 4.

3.

Quality management system.

3.1. The manufacturer must lodge an application for assessment of his quality management system with a notified body of

his choice, for the interoperability constituents concerned.

The application must include:

— all relevant information for the product category representative for the interoperability constituent envisaged,

— the quality management system's documentation.

— a written declaration that the same application has not been lodged with any other notified body,

3.2. The quality management system must ensure compliance of the interoperability constituent with the requirements of
the TSI that apply to it. All the elements, requirements and provisions adopted by the manufacturer must be
documented in a systematic and orderly manner in the form of written policies, procedures and instructions. This
quality management system documentation shall ensure a common understanding of the quality policies and
procedures such as quality programmes, plans, manuals and records.

It must contain in particular an adequate description of:

— the quality objectives and the organisational structure,

— responsibilities and powers of the management with regard to design and product quality,

— the technical design specifications, including European specifications (1), that will be applied, and, where the
European specifications will not be applied in full, the means that will be used to ensure that the requirements of
the TSI that apply to the interoperability constituent will be met,

— the design control and design verification techniques, processes and systematic actions that will be used when

designing the interoperability constituents pertaining to the product category covered,

— the corresponding manufacturing, quality control and quality management system techniques, processes and

systematic actions that will be used,

(1) The definition of an European specification is indicated in the directives 96/48/EC and 01/16/EC. The guide for application of HS TSIs

explains the way to use the European Specifications

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/325

— the examinations, checks and tests that will be carried out before, during and after manufacture, and the

frequency with which they will be undertaken,

— the quality records, such as inspection reports and test data, calibration data, qualification reports of the

personnel concerned, etc.,

— the means to monitor the achievement of the required design and product quality and the effective operation of

the quality management system.

The quality policies and procedures shall cover in particular the assessment phases, such as design review, review of
manufacturing processes and type tests, as they are specified in the TSI, for different characteristics and performances
of the interoperability constituent.

3.3. The notified body must assess the quality management system to determine whether it satisfies the requirements of
point 3.2. It presumes compliance with these requirements if the manufacturer implements a quality system for
design, production, final product inspection and testing in respect of the Standard EN/ISO 9001- 2000, which takes
into consideration the specificity of the interoperability constituent for which it is implemented.

When the manufacturer operates a certified quality management system, the notified body shall take this into account
in the assessment.

The audit must be specific for the product category, which is representative for the interoperability constituent. The
auditing team must have at least one member experienced as an assessor in the product technology concerned. The
evaluation procedure shall include an assessment visit to the manufacturer's premises.

The decision must be notified to the manufacturer. The notification must contain the conclusions of the audit and the
reasoned assessment decision.

3.4. The manufacturer must undertake to fulfil the obligations arising out of the quality management system as approved

and to uphold it so that it remains adequate and efficient.

The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community shall keep the notified body that
has approved the quality management system informed of any intended updating of the quality management system.

The notified body must evaluate the modifications proposed and decide whether the amended quality management
system will still satisfy the requirements of point 3.2 or whether a re-assessment is required.

It must notify its decision to the manufacturer. The notification shall contain the conclusions of the evaluation and the
reasoned assessment decision.

4.

Surveillance of the quality management system under the responsibility of the notified body

4.1. The purpose of surveillance is to make sure that the manufacturer duly fulfils the obligations arising out of the

approved quality management system.

4.2. The manufacturer must allow the notified body entrance for inspection purposes to the locations of design,
manufacture, inspection and testing, and storage, and shall provide it with all necessary information, including:

— the quality management system documentation,

— the quality records as foreseen by the design part of the quality management system, such as results of analyses,

calculations, tests, etc.,

— the quality records as foreseen by the manufacturing part of the quality management system, such as inspection

reports and test data, calibration data, qualification reports of the personnel concerned, etc.

4.3. The notified body must periodically carry out audits to make sure that the manufacturer maintains and applies the
quality management system and shall provide an audit report to the manufacturer. When the manufacturer operates a
certified quality management system, the notified body shall take this into account in the surveillance.

The frequency of the audits shall be at least once a year.

4.4. Additionally the notified body may pay unexpected visits to the manufacturer. At the time of such visits, the notified
body may carry out tests or have them carried out in order to check the proper functioning of the quality
management system where necessary. It must provide the manufacturer with a visit report and, if a test has been
carried out, with a test report.

L 344/326

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

5.

The manufacturer must, for a period of 10 years after the last product has been manufactured, keep at the disposal of
the national authorities:

— the documentation referenced in the second indent of the second subparagraph of point 3.1,

— the updating referenced to in the second subparagraph of point 3.4,

— the decisions and reports from the notified body in the final subparagraph of points 3.4, 4.3 and 4.4.

6.

Design examination

6.1. The manufacturer must lodge an application for examination of the design of the interoperability constituent with a

notified body of his choice

6.2. The application must enable the design, manufacture, maintenance and operation of the interoperability constituent to

be understood, and shall enable conformity with the requirements of the TSI to be assessed.

It must include:

— a general type-description,

— the technical design specifications, including European specifications, with relevant clauses, that have been

applied in full or in part,

— any necessary supporting evidence for their adequacy, in particular where the European specifications and the

relevant clauses have not been applied. ,

— the test programme

— conditions for integration of the interoperability constituent in its system environment (sub-assembly, assembly,

subsystem) and the necessary interface conditions,

— conditions for use and maintenance of the interoperability constituent (restrictions of running time or distance,

wear limits etc),

— a written declaration that the same application has not been lodged with any other notified body,

6.

3 The applicant shall present the results of tests (1), including type tests when required, carried out by its appropriate
laboratory or on their behalf.

6.4. The notified body must examine the application and assess the results of the tests. Where the design meets the
provisions of the TSI that apply to it, the notified body must issue an EC design examination certificate to the
applicant. The certificate shall contain the conclusions of the examination, conditions for its validity, the necessary
data for identification of the approved design and, if relevant, a description of the product's functioning.

The time period of validity shall be no longer than 5 years.

6.5. The applicant must keep the notified body that has issued the EC design examination certificate informed of any
modification to the approved design. Modifications to the approved design must receive additional approval from the
notified body that issued the EC design examination certificate where such changes may affect the conformity with the
requirements of the TSI or the prescribed conditions for use of the product. In this case, the notified body shall
perform only those examinations and tests that are relevant and necessary to the changes. The additional approval
shall be given in the form of an addition to the original EC design examination certificate.

6.6.

If no modifications as in point 6.4. have been made, the validity of an expiring certificate can be extended for another
period of validity. The applicant will apply for such a prolongation by a written confirmation that no such
modifications have been made, and the notified body issues a prolongation for another period of validity as in point
6.3. if no contrary information exists. This procedure can be reiterated.

7.

Each notified body must communicate to the other notified bodies the relevant information concerning the quality
management system approvals and the EC design examination certificates, which it has issued, withdrawn or refused.

(1) The presentation of the results of the tests can be at the same time as the application or later.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/327

The other notified bodies may receive on request copies of:

— the quality management system approvals and additional approvals issued and

— the EC design examination certificates and additions issued

8.

The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community must draw up the EC declaration
of conformity of the interoperability constituent.

The content of this declaration shall include at least the information indicated in Annex IV (3) of Directives 96/48/EC
or 01/16/EC. The EC declaration of conformity and its accompanying documents must be dated and signed.

The declaration must be written in the same language as the technical documentation and must contain the following:

— the Directive references (Directives 96/48/EC or 01/16/EC and other directives to which the interoperability

constituent may be subject),

— the name and address of the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community
(give trade name and full address and in the case of an authorised representative also give the trade name of the
manufacturer or constructor),

— description of interoperability constituent (make, type, etc)

— description of the procedure (module) followed in order to declare conformity,

— all of the relevant descriptions met by the interoperability constituent and in particular any conditions of use,

— name and address of notified body (bodies) involved in the procedure followed in respect of conformity and date

of certificates together with the duration and conditions of validity of the certificates,

— reference to the TSI and any other applicable TSI and where appropriate to European specifications,

— identification of the signatory empowered to enter into commitments on behalf of the manufacturer or of his

authorised representative established within the Community.

The certificates to be referred to are:

— the quality management system approval and surveillance reports indicated in point 3 and 4,

— the EC design examination certificate and its additions.

9.

The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community must keep a copy of the EC
declaration of conformity for a period of 10 years after the last interoperability constituent has been manufactured.

Where neither the manufacturer nor his authorised representative is established within the Community, the obligation
to keep the technical documentation available is the responsibility of the person who places the interoperability
constituent on the Community market.

10.

If additional to the EC declaration of conformity an EC declaration of suitability for use for the interoperability
constituent is requested in the TSI, this declaration has to be added, after being issued by the manufacturer under the
conditions of Module V.

MODULES FOR INTEROPERABILITY CONSTITUENTS

Module V: Type-Validation By In Service Experience (Suitability For Use)

1.

This module describes that part of the procedure by which a notified body ascertains and attests that a specimen,
representative of the production envisaged, meets the provisions of the TSI that apply to it for suitability for use, by
type validation as demonstrated through in service experience (1).

(1) During the time of in service experience, the IC is not placed on the market and the manufacturer cannot supply it to the clients.

L 344/328

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

2.

The manufacturer, or his authorised representative established within the Community, must lodge the application for
the type-validation by in service experience with a notified body of his choice.

The application must include:

— the name and address of the manufacturer and also, if the application is lodged by the authorised representative,

his name and address,

— a written declaration that the same application has not been lodged with any other notified body,

— the technical documentation, as described in point 3,

— the programme for validation by in service experience, as described in point 4,

— the name and address of the company(ies) (infrastructure managers and/or railway enterprises), with which the
applicant has obtained an agreement to contribute to a suitability for use assessment by in service experience

— by operating the interoperability constituent in service,

— by monitoring the in service behaviour and

— by issuing a report about in service experience,

— the name and the address of the company undertaking the maintenance of the interoperability constituent

during the time period or running distance required for in service experience,

— an EC declaration of conformity for the interoperability constituent and,

— if module B is required in the TSI, an EC type examination certificate,

— if module H2 is required in the TSI, an EC design examination certificate.

The applicant must place at the disposal of the company(ies), undertaking the operation of the interoperability
constituent in service a specimen or a sufficient number of specimens, representative of the production envisaged and
hereinafter called ‘type’. A type may cover several versions of the interoperability constituent provided that the
differences between the versions are all covered by EC declarations of conformity and certificates as mentioned above.

The notified body may request further specimens if needed for carrying out the validation by in service experience to
be put in service.

3.

The technical documentation must enable the assessment of the product with the requirements of the TSI. The
documentation must cover the operation of the interoperability constituent, and, as far as relevant for such
assessment, cover also the design, manufacture and maintenance.

The technical documentation must contain

— a general type-description,

— the technical specification, against which the performance and in service behaviour of the interoperability

constituent is to be assessed (relevant TSI and/or European Specifications with relevant clauses),

— conditions of integration of the interoperability constituent in its system environment (sub-assembly, assembly,

subsystem) and the necessary interface conditions,

— conditions for use and maintenance of the interoperability constituent (restrictions of running time or distance,

wear limits etc),

— descriptions and explanations necessary for the understanding of the design, manufacture and operation of the

interoperability constituent;

and, as far as is relevant for assessment,

— conceptual design and manufacturing drawings,

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/329

— results of design calculations made and examinations carried out,

— test reports.

If the TSI requires further information for the technical documentation, this shall be included. A list of the European
specifications referenced to in the technical documentation, applied in full or in part, shall be attached.

4.

The programme for the validation by in service experience must include:

— the required performance or behaviour in service of the interoperability constituent under trial,

— the installation arrangements,

— the duration of the programme — either time or distance -

— the operating conditions and the service programme expected,

— the maintenance programme,

— the special in service tests, if any, to be performed,

— the batch size of the specimens — if more than one,

— the inspection programme (nature, number and frequency of inspections, documentation),

— criteria for tolerable defects and their impact on the programme,

— the information to be included in the report of the company operating the interoperability constituent in service

(see point 2).

5.

The notified body must:

5.1. Examine the technical documentation and the programme for validation by in service experience,

5.2. Verify that the type is representative and has been manufactured in conformity with the technical documentation,

5.3. Verify that the programme for validation by in service experience is well adapted to assess the required performance

and in service behaviour of the interoperability constituent,

5.4. Agree with the applicant the programme and the location where the inspections and necessary tests will be carried out

and the body performing the tests (notified body or other competent laboratory),

5.5. Monitor and inspect the progress of in service running, operation and maintenance of the interoperability constituent,

5.6. Evaluate the report, to be issued by the company (ies) (infrastructure managers and/or railway enterprises) operating
the interoperability constituent, and all other documentation and information, gained during the procedure (test
reports, maintenance experience etc),

5.7. Assess, if the in service behaviour meets the requirements of the TSI.

6. Where the type meets the provisions of the TSI, the notified body must issue a suitability for use certificate to the
applicant. The certificate must contain the name and address of the manufacturer, conclusions of the validation,
conditions for its validity and the necessary data for identification of the approved type.

The time period of validity shall be no longer than 5 years.

A list of the relevant parts of the technical documentation must be annexed to the certificate and a copy kept by the
notified body.

If the applicant is denied a suitability for use certificate, the notified body must provide detailed reasons for such
denial.

Provision must be made for an appeals procedure.

L 344/330

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

The applicant must inform the notified body that holds the technical documentation concerning the suitability for use
certificate of all modifications to the approved product which must receive additional approval where such changes
may affect the suitability for use or the prescribed conditions for use of the product. In this case, the notified body
shall perform only those examinations and tests that are relevant and necessary to the changes. The additional
approval may be given in the form of an addition to the original suitability for use certificate, or by issue of a new
certificate issued after withdrawal of the old certificate.

If no modifications as in point 7 have been made, the validity of an expiring certificate can be extended for another
period of validity. The applicant will apply for such a prolongation by a written confirmation that no such
modifications have been made, and the notified body issues a prolongation for another period of validity as in point 6,
if no contrary information exists. This procedure can be reiterated.

Each notified body must communicate to the other notified bodies the relevant information concerning the suitability
for use certificates issued, withdrawn or refused.

The other notified bodies shall be provided on request with copies of the suitability for use certificates issued and/or
their additions. The annexes to the certificates must be kept at the disposal of the other notified bodies.

The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community must draw up the EC declaration
of suitability for use of the interoperability constituent.

The content of this declaration shall include at least the information, indicated in Annex IV (3) of Directives 96/48/EC
or 01/16/EC.

The EC declaration of suitability for use and the accompanying documents must be dated and signed.

The declaration must be written in the same language as the technical documentation and must contain the following:

— the Directive references (Directives 96/48/EC or 01/16/EC),

— the name and address of the manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community
(give trade name and full address and in the case of an authorised representative also give the trade name of the
manufacturer or constructor),

— description of interoperability constituent (make, type, etc)

— all of the relevant descriptions met by the interoperability constituent and in particular any conditions of use,

— name and address of notified body (bodies) involved in the procedure followed in respect of suitability for use
and date of suitability for use certificate together with the duration and conditions of validity of the certificate,

— reference to this TSI and to any other applicable TSI, and where appropriate reference to European specification,

— identification of the signatory empowered to enter into commitments on behalf of the manufacturer or of his

authorised representative established within the Community.

12.

The manufacturer or his authorised representative established within the Community must keep a copy of the EC
declaration of suitability for use for a period of 10 years after the last interoperability constituent has been
manufactured. Where neither
the manufacturer nor his authorised representative is established within the
Community, the obligation to keep the technical documentation available is the responsibility of the person who
places the interoperability constituent on the Community market.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/331

ANNEX R

VEHICLE TRACK INTERACTION AND GAUGING

Longitudinal compressive forces

R.1. TESTS CONDITIONS

R.1.1. Track

The track for the tests shall consist in an S-format curve of R = 150m. Curves are separated by a section of straight track
measuring 6m in length.

Fig. R1

The track for the tests shall have - 0- cant. The average gauge is between 1,450-1,465 mm.

R.1.2. Test train

— Standard configuration

Use of slave wagons with the following characteristics:

Front wagon

Tail wagon

Type

Fcs or Tds

Rs

Length over buffer:

Wheelbase:

9,64 m

6,00 m

19,90 m

13,00 m

The fig. R2 is an example of a test train with the above-mentioned standard configurations.

The slave wagon must be laden (20tons axle load) and the test wagon shall be empty.

— Complete configuration

By long two axles freight wagons with LoB ≥ 15,75 m is a special test in a three wagon train configuration necessary
(test wagen and two slave wagons with the same geometrical parameters).

L 344/332

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Fig. R2

To calculate the longitudinal compressive force, use shall be made of 2 or 4 axle intermediate wagons fitted at one end with
central-buffer coupling (incorporating a stress recorder) (1).

R.1.3. Buffer type

The slave wagons must be fitted with category A non-pivoting buffers (590kN end-stroke force) which have already been
used in revenue service. The buffers on the slave wagons shall have spherical bearing surfaces of R = 1 500 mm. The test
wagon shall be fitted with the same buffer type as the model to be used in its future operating.

When starting the tests, the buffer bearing surfaces shall show no signs of wear.

R.1.4. Carrying out the tests

The screw couplers between the test wagon and the slave wagons are to be tightened in such a way that when on the straight
track the buffer plates are in contact without pre-tensioning

The vertical offset of buffer centre-lines between the slave wagons and the test wagon will need to be approximately
80mm (2).

The buffer plates shall have a low friction surface, such as lightly greased steel. Any building up of material as a result of
scratches must be removed after each test. Buffer-plate pairs shall be replaced where, as a result of scratches or deformation,
results obtained differ considerably from those already recorded.

The test train shall reverse back along an S-shaped curve at a speed of 4 to 8 km/h with a longitudinal compressive force that
remains virtually constant. The longitudinal compressive force will steadily increase until one of the evaluation criteria
mentioned under point 4 is reached or exceeded. Until 280 kN it will not reach any evaluation criteria and so does not need
to be increased.

In order to determine the linear comparison, at least 20 tests shall be carried out for analysis, with different longitudinal
compressive forces. On this occasion, the average longitudinal compressive force (2-axle goods wagons 200kN and bogie
wagons 240kN) should be exceeded of about 10 % in at least 10 of the tests.

In the course of the 20 tests, at 5 consecutive tests of the longitudinal compressive force must be carried out without
changing the buffers or buffer plates maintenance. According to point 4, no evaluation criterion shall be exceeded.

R.2. SCOPE OF MEASUREMENTS

R.2.1. Measurements during the tests

As a minimum, the following values shall be measured during the tests and recorded:

— Longitudinal Compressive Force FLxi

— Wheel elevation dzij of all wheels

(1) Other measuring systems giving the same results may also be used.
(2) Conditional type of construction tolerances are authorised.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/333

— Lateral forces on axle-boxes Hyj of all wheels

— Deformation of axle guards dAijy of all wheels (of goods wagons fitted with axle guards only)

— Lateral movements dyP1, dyP2 of the buffers between the slave wagons and test wagon

— Recording of track markers (Fig. R1)

— Distance covered (e.g. 1 m marker)

Fig. R3

R.2.2. Measurements/Calculations to be made

— Measurement of the torsional stiffness (ct*) of the slave wagons of the tested wagon.

— Measurement of the characteristic static curve on the buffers of the slave wagons and test wagon.

— Measurements of the track geometry before and after the tests

— Measurements of the lateral and longitudinal play between the axle box and axle guard on the test wagon before and

after the tests

— Measurements of the buffer height above the rail top on the slave wagons and test wagon.

R.3. EVALUATION CRITERIA USED TO CALCULATE THE PERMISSIBLE LONGITUDINAL COMPRESSIVE FORCE.

— Evaluation of a non-guide wheel dzij ≥ 50 mm over a distance of ≥ 2 m.

— Climbing of the guide wheel dzij ≥ 5 mm for wheel load Qij < 0; guide wheels are wheels 11 and 12 in 2 axle wagons.

This criterian is to be checked in the case of the complete configuration of test trains (s. chapter R 1.2).

— Axle-guard deformation dyAij ≥ 22 mm (1), measured 380 mm from the lower edge of the sole-bar.

— Stabilised track stress Hlim (2m) = 25 + 0,6 x 2 x Qo (kN)

Qo = middle wheel force on rail

— Minimum horizontal overlap of buffer plates ≥ 25mm.

L 344/334

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

R.4. ANALYSIS

For each test, it is necessary to calculate:

— Hy, i Dz, i,j value over a distance of 2m

— dzij as a value of the climbing of the guide wheel. Analysis to be checked only with test trains in complete

configuration (s. chapter R 1.2)

— FLX

— dyAij (for 2-acsle wagons with guards)

— dyp

The values calculated shall be presented in graphic form as a function of the longitudinal compressive force FLX.

In order to calculate the permissible longitudinal compressive force, the straight regression line equations shall be defined
for the quantities to be measured dzij, dyAi,j and Hyi

The permissible longitudinal compressive force shall be defined as the value found on the abscissa for the point of
intersection between the straight regression line and the evaluation criterion (see fig. R4)

Fig. R4

The evaluation criterion giving the lowest value for FLert shall determine the permissible longitudinal compressive forces. A
report shall be drawn up, describing the tests carried out and presenting a summary of the most important data in table
form.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/335

R.5. CONDITIONS FOR TEST EXEMPTION

2axle wagons: in dependence of tare weight, length over buffers and torsional stiffness acc. the following diagram:

Fig. R5

4axle wagons:

— tare weight ≥ 16 t

— rate tare weight/LOB ≥ 1,0 t/m

— length of overhang in accordance with the conditions in Fig. R6 for wagons with steering axle bogies and in Fig. R7

for wagons with bogie type Y25.

L 344/336

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Fig. R 6

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/337

Fig. R 7

L 344/338

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

ANNEX S

BRAKING

Braking Performance

S.1.

Determining the braking power of vehicles fitted with UIC air brake for passenger trains . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

339

S.1.1.

General

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

339

S.1.2.

Determining the braking power by calculation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

339

S.1.2.1. Determining the braking power using the factor k . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

339

S.1.2.2. Wagons for which the required condition for calculating the braking power according to paragraph S.1.2.1
is not given. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

340

S.1.3.

Determining the braked mass in tests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

341

S.1.3.1. Wagons with a maximum speed of £ 120 km/h . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

341

S.1.3.1.1. Tests on a single vehicle (slip brake tests) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

341

S.1.3.1.2. Vehicle composition in the slip brake test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

341

S.1.3.2. Wagons with a maximum speed greater than 120 km/h but not exceeding 160 km/h . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

342

S.2.

Determining the braking power of wagons fitted with a UIC air brake for freight trains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

343

S.3.

Execution of tests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

343

S.3.1.

Method of execution for the tests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

343

S.3.1.1. Atmospheric conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

343

S.3.1.2. Number of tests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

343

S.3.1.3. Condition of friction components and discs/wheels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

343

S.3.2. Method of evaluating the test results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

344

S.3.2.1. Correcting the braking distances from each test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

344

S.3.2.2. Correcting the mean braking distance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

344

S.4.

Evaluation of brake performance by a calculation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

345

S.4.1.

Step by step calculation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

345

S.4.2.

Calculation by stages of deceleration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

346

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/339

S.1. DETERMINING THE BRAKING POWER OF VEHICLES FITTED WITH UIC AIR BRAKE FOR PASSENGER TRAINS.

S.1.1. General

The braked mass marked on a wagon shall indicate the braking power of this wagon in a 500 m long train that is braked in
the P position.

The braked mass of a train of wagons is in principle the sum of the braked mass painted on the vehicles with an active brake.

This braked mass applies to hauled rakes that are ≤ 500 m long and braked in the P position.

S.1.2. Determining the braking power by calculation

S.1.2.1. Determining the braking power using the factor k

The braked mass B of a wagon shall be determined by calculation providing the following conditions are met:

— maximum speed ≤ 120 km/h,

— the wheels are braked on both sides and have a nominal diameter of 920 to 1 000 mm,

— the brake shoes are made of P10 cast iron,

— the blocks are type Bg (single) or Bgu (tandem),

— force applied by the shoes 5 to 40 kN with Bg and 5 to 55 kN with Bgu blocks.

The braked mass shall be calculated using the following formula:

Equation (S1): B t½ (cid:138) ¼

k –½ (cid:138) (cid:2) ΣFdyn kN½
(cid:138)
9,81 m=s2
½

(cid:138)

where ΣFdyn is the sum of all the forces applied by the shoes whilst the vehicle is moving and k is a dimensionless factor that
depends on the type of shoe (Bg or Bgu) and on the contact force of each shoe.

ΣFdyn shall be calculated using the following formula:

ΣFdyn ¼ Ft (cid:2) i − i* (cid:2) FR

ð

Þ (cid:2) ηdyn

Where:

Effective force at the brake cylinder [kN], once the recoil of thecylinders and of the rigging has been deducted
Total increment for the brake rigging
The increment after the central rigging (normally 4 for two-axled wagons and 8 for bogie wagons)

Ft =
i =
i* =
ηdyn = Mean efficiency of the rigging whilst the vehicle is moving (mean between two maintenance visits). ηdyn can be up to

0,91, depending on the type of rigging.

FR = Opposing force applied from the regulator (usually 2 kN)

The ‘k’ curves used to calculate the braked mass are given by mathematical formulae of the following type:

Equation (S2): k ¼ a0 þ a1 (cid:2) Fdyn þ a2 (cid:2) F2

dyn þ a3 (cid:2) F3
dyn

where:

kBg

kBgu

a0

2,145

2,137

a1

- 5,38 × 10-2

- 5,14 × 10-2

a2

7,8 × 10-4

8,32 × 10-4

a3

- 5,36 × 10-6

- 6,04 × 10-6

L 344/340

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

S.1.2.2. Wagons for which the required condition for calculating the braking power according to paragraph S.1.2.1 is not given.

The calculation method described below shall be used to design the brake equipment of wagons with a maximum speed of
≤ 120 km/h. The braked mass that is painted on the wagon shall be determined in tests.

The braked mass is usually calculated in the following two stages:

1.

2.

Calculation of the braking distance based on the braking power applied in the various speed ranges.

Determination of the braked mass percentage from the calculated braking distance using the assessment graph in Fig.
S1 (wagon taken in isolation).

Fig.S1

Assessment graph

The braking distance shall be calculated step-by-step (chapter S.4.1) or by deceleration stages (chapter S.4.2)

The calculation methods that are indicated apply in principle to a single wagon.

The braking distance shall be calculated for each of the initial speeds given in chapter S.1.3.2 and for the load conditions in
chapter S.1.3.2 taking into account:

— the average dynamic efficiency between two maintenance visits,

— a brake cylinder filling time of 4s,

— the lowest mean friction characteristic for the friction materials on this type of wagon.

Once the braking distances have been calculated the braked mass shall be pre-determined using the procedure from chapter
S.1.3.2, but with the calculated braking distances instead of the mean braking distances measured in tests.

For wagons as described in chapter S.1.2.1 that have a maximum speed of 140 km/h, the braked mass calculated for
120 km/h (cf. chapter S.1.2.1) may also be used for the maximum speed of 140 km/h.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/341

The braked mass may be pre-determined using this calculation procedure, taking into account the following additional
points:

— The braking distance shall be calculated for braking from 100, 120, 140 and 160 km/h up to the maximum speed of

the wagon;

— Once the braking distances have been calculated, the braked mass shall be pre-determined using the procedure from
chapter S.1.3.2, but with the calculated braking distances instead of the mean braking distances measured in tests.

The braked mass that is painted on the wagon shall be determined in tests (chapter S.1.3).

S.1.3. Determining the braked mass in tests

This procedure shall be obligatory wherever there is no approved calculation method. The procedure may also be carried
out for wagons as described in chapter S.1.2.1 (P10 shoes). If the tests give a braked mass that is higher than the calculated
value then the calculated value shall not be changed; if the tests give a braked mass that is lower than the calculated value,
the reason for that result shall be determined.

test may be carried out:

— tests with a single vehicle

In these tests the braking distance of the train or wagon shall be measured in an emergency brake application from v0 on
straight and flat track. The braking distance shall be measured from the point where the emergency brake application was
initiated.

S.1.3.1. Wagons with a maximum speed of ≤ 120 km/h

S . 1 . 3 . 1 . 1 . Te s t s o n a s i n g l e v e h i c l e ( s l i p b r a k e t e s t s )

The vehicle in question shall be coupled to a locomotive and accelerated up to a speed of v0. Once that speed has been
reached the mechanical coupler shall be uncoupled. An emergency brake application shall be made. The braking distance
shall be measured from the point where the emergency brake application was initiated.

S . 1 . 3 . 1 . 2 . Ve h i c l e c o m p o s i t i o n i n t h e s l i p b r a k e t e s t

— One wagon in the case of a basic bogie-wagon;

— A group of three wagons in the case of two-axle wagons;

— A group of two wagons in the case of articulated non-bogie wagons;

— A set of wagons that cannot be split in service.

The slip brake tests shall be carried out at 100 km/h and 120 km/h.

Where an ‘empty-loaded’ changeover device is present, slip brake tests shall be carried out:

— in the ‘empty’ position, around the transition load (providing this is possible with the vehicle type in question). In the
case of an automatic ‘empty-loaded’ changeover device, the tests shall also be carried out in the ‘empty’ position
around the transition load, but at a load that is far enough below the transition load for the automatic device to be
stable in the ‘empty’ position;

— at maximum load, in the ‘loaded’ position.

In the case of vehicles with an automatic, continually operating load changeover device the slip brake tests shall be carried
out:

— in the empty state (tare mass), in the ‘empty’ loading position, in order to check that the maximum λ value prescribed

has not been exceeded

— with the maximum load (which shall give the maximum braked mass).

— Slip brake tests shall also be carried out to verify the braked mass at the point of maximum energy dissipation.

The general test conditions can be found in chapter S.3.1.

L 344/342

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

The measured distance shall be corrected for nominal test conditions (vo nom) using the method given in chapter S.3.2.

From the mean braking distance s (mean of the permissible corrected values), the braked mass percentage of the vehicle shall
be determined either from the 120 km/h and/or 100 km/h curves in fig. S1 or from the formula in table S1. The resulting
minimum braked mass percentage shall be taken.

Table S1

Calculation of λ

S ¼

C
λ þ D

S ¼

C
S

− D

C

52 840

83 634

119 179

161 280

V
[km/h]

100

120

140

160

D

10

19

19

19

These formulae are valid inside the limits corresponding to the extremities of the curves in Fig. S1.

When the braked mass to be painted on the vehicle is determined in tests the test result shall be adjusted for the ‘mean’
dynamic efficiency between two maintenance visits (0,83 for wagons as described in chapter S.1.2.1).

With P10 shoes the braked mass shall be corrected for the dynamic power at the insert holder using the following method:

a)

Determine the efficiency of the brake rigging as accurately as possible whilst the vehicle is running in the test to
determine ηdyn test.

Where this measurement has not been taken, ηdyn test = 0,91 may be used for new wagons with conventional rigging.

For other vehicles where ηdyn test has not been measured the following may be used:

ηdyn test ¼

1 þ ηstat test
2

This formula may not be applied for ηstat test values of less than 0,6. ηdyn test shall never be higher than 0,91.

b) With Btest as the braked mass per insert holder in the test, the equations (1) and (2) above may be used to determine

Fdyn test either by directly reading off the value.

c)

The corrected dynamic power is as follows:

Fdyn corr ¼ Fdyn test (cid:2)

0,83
ηdyn test

d) With this value for Fdyn corr the same tables may be used to determine the corrected braked mass per insert holder, Bcorr.

S.1.3.2. Wagons with a maximum speed greater than 120 km/h but not exceeding 160 km/h

The method shall be identical to that set down in chapter S.1.3.1 with two additional series of tests, one from 140 km/h and
the other from 160 km/h if the wagon is capable of running at 160 km/h.

The measured braking distances shall be corrected for the nominal test conditions (Vo nom) using the method given in chapter
S.3.2.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/343

The corrected mean braking distances shall be used to determine 4 values for λ (λ100, λ120, λ140, λ160) from the curves in fig.
S1 (or from the formulae for these curves — see table S1).

The minimum value shall be taken from λ100, λ120, λ140 and λ160.

S.2. DETERMINING THE BRAKING POWER OF WAGONS FITTED WITH A UIC AIR BRAKE FOR FREIGHT TRAINS

The braked mass of wagons in position G shall be deemed to be the same as the braked mass determined in position P.

There shall be no separate assessment of the braking power of wagons in position G.

S.3. EXECUTION OF TESTS

S.3.1. Method of execution for the tests

S.3.1.1. Atmospheric conditions

In order to avoid bad atmospheric conditions affecting the results the tests shall be carried out with minimum wind and dry
rail.

S.3.1.2. Number of tests

At least 4 valid tests shall be carried out from which the mean shall then be calculated. All the braking distances obtained
shall be corrected according to point 1 of chapter S.3.2.

The mean shall be accepted if it meets the following criteria, which shall be checked simultaneously:

Criterion 1:

Standard deviation of sample ðσnÞ
Mean of sample ðs Þ

(cid:20) 3,0%and

1. Criterion 2: Extreme valueðseÞ – mean ðs Þ

j

j (cid:20) 1,95 (cid:2) σn

where se is the braking distance furthest from the mean.

If one of the two criteria is not met, then a supplementary test shall be carried out (rejecting the extreme value ‘se’ if
criterion 2 is not met and n ≥ 5).

With the new values thus obtained, criteria 1 and 2 shall then be checked where:

the braking distance measured in test ‘i’, after correction
the mean braking distance,
the number of tests,
the standard deviation of the sample

si =
s ¼
n =
σn =

and

r

ﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃ
Σ si − s
j2
j
n

σn ¼

The number of valid tests shall be at least 70 % of the total number of tests performed. The tests taken out in accordance
with chapter S.3.2, Point 1b, shall not figure in the total number of tests.

If after a total of 10 tests, one of the two criteria is not met, the test series shall be interrupted and the braking system
controlled. The test interruption shall be recorded in the test report.

S.3.1.3. Condition of friction components and discs/wheels

Before starting the tests the vehicle's friction components (brake pads/shoes) shall be run in up to at least 70 % coverage.
Shorter braking distances are obtained with 3 to 5 mm wear on cast iron brake shoes. If the tests include braking to a
standstill in wet conditions, the leading edge of the pad/shoe shall be run-in in the direction of rotation.

L 344/344

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

It is recommended that the tests be carried out on block-braked vehicles with wheels (either new or re-profiled) that have
been run for at least 1 200 km.

It is recommended that the initial temperature of the discs/wheels be between 50 oC and 60 oC.

S.3.2. Method of evaluating the test results

S.3.2.1. Correcting the braking distances from each test

The braking distance obtained in test ‘j’ shall be corrected to take into account the following factors:

— nominal speed in relation to the initial speed measured in the test;

— gradient of the test track.

The correction shall be made by applying the following formula:

V2
jnom
2 (cid:2) 3,62 (cid:2) sjcorr

¼

V2
jmeas
2 (cid:2) 3,62 (cid:2) sjmeas

−

g
ρ

(cid:2)

i
1000

Transformation gives the following:

sjcorr ¼

where:

3,933 (cid:2) ρ (cid:2) v2

3,933 (cid:2) ρ (cid:2) v2

jnom
jmeas − i (cid:2) sjmeas

(cid:2) sjmeas

sjcorr [m]
sjmeas [m]
vjnom [km/h]
vjmeas [km/h]
ρ

= corrected braking distance (which corresponds to the nominal speed in test j);
= braking distance measured in test j;
= nominal initial speed in test j;
= initial speed measured in test j;
= coefficient of inertia of the ‘rotating masses’, which is defined as follows:

ρ ¼ 1 þ

mr
m

where:

m = mass of the test train or vehicle,
mr = equivalent mass of the rotating components.

(Where no exact value is known ρ = 1,15 for locomotives and ρ = 1,04 for coaches shall be used.);

i [mm/m] =

mean gradient over sjmeas on the test track, which is positive (+) for an upgrade and negative (-) for a
downgrade.

The following two criteria shall be verified to validate the test:

a)

3 mm/m (5 mm/m in exceptional cases)

and

b)

vjmeas - vjnom ≤ 4 km/h

S.3.2.2. Correcting the mean braking distance s

The mean braking distance s , obtained in accordance with chapter S.3.1, shall be corrected to take into account the
following factors:

a)

Dynamic efficiency of the brake rigging tested as compared with the mean in-service value and, for disc brakes, the
mean wheel diameter on the vehicles tested as compared to the diameter of the half-worn wheel. For wagons with P10
block brakes and conventional brake rigging the dynamic efficiency shall be corrected using the method set out in
S.1.3.1.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/345

The mean braking distance shall be corrected using the following formulae:

Fcorr ¼ Ftest (cid:2)

ηm
ηtest

(cid:2)

dtest
dm

and

where:

s corr [m] =

s [m] =

te [s] =
Vnom [m/s] =
dtest [mm] =
dm [mm] =
Fcorr [kN] =
Ftest [kN] =
ηM =
ηtest =
Wm [kN] =

s corr ¼ te (cid:2) vnom þ

Ftest þ Wm
Fcorr þ Wm

(cid:2) s − vnom (cid:2) te

f

g

corrected mean braking distance;

mean braking distance in the test;

equivalent build-up time for the braking power;

nominal initial speed in the test;

mean wheel diameter on the vehicles tested;

diameter of the half-worn wheel;

corrected braking power;

mean braking power in the test;

efficiency of the brake rigging in average service conditions;

efficiency of the brake rigging in the test;

mean resistance to forward motion.

b)

Real filling time in relation to the nominal 4s. This correction shall only be applied to tests with a vehicle taken in
isolation.

The following correction formula shall be applied:

(cid:16)

s corr ¼ 2 −

(cid:17)

ts
2

(cid:2) Vnom þ S

where:

s corr [m] =

s [m] =

ts [s] =
Vnom [m/s] =

corrected mean braking distance;

mean braking distance;

measured mean filling time for the brake cylinders;

nominal initial speed in the tests.

S.4. EVALUATION OF BRAKE PERFORMANCE BY A CALCULATION

S.4.1. Step by step calculation

The stop distance calculation can be performed step by step starting with general method based on dynamic equation; the
algorithm is defined as follows :

Step 1:

with:

ΣFi
Wi
me
ai

ΣFi þ Wi ¼ me (cid:2) ai

sum of retarding forces of all active brakes

retarding resistance at time i ;

Equivalent vehicle mass (including rotating masses);

Deceleration at time i.

L 344/346

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Step 2:

Step 3:
with:

ai ¼ ΣFi þ Wi
me

vIþ1 ¼ vi − ai (cid:2) Δt

Δt
vi
vI+1

Time calculation interval (Δt ≤ 1s);
initial speed of interval Δt;
final speed of interval Δt;

Vmi ¼

Vi þ Viþ1
2

mean speed in time interval Δt.

Δsi = vmi x Δt

Step 4 :

with

vmi

Step 5 :
with:

Δsi

running distance during interval Δt.

The distance Δsi may be also calculated with one of the following formula :

Step 5bis :

Step 5ter :

1
2

(cid:2) ai (cid:2) Δt2

Δsj ¼ vj (cid:2) Δt −
i − v2
v2
iþ1
2 (cid:2) ai

Δsj ¼

On the hypothesis where the brake force is constant on the interval, all the formulas give the same result.

Step 6 :
With:

s = Σ (vmi × Δt)

s

s total stopping distance (down to v = 0)

S.4.2. Calculation by stages of deceleration

In the cases when the vehicles are equiped with brakes which established retarding forces are constant by stages in some
speed intervals or if one know the mean of this force, the following simplified method is possible:

Step 1 :

with:

ami ¼ ΣFmi þ Wmi

me

Fmi , Wmi and amiconstant values or mean in the speed interval vi à vi+1.

Step 2 :

With:

Δsi

Δsj ¼

i − v2
v2
2 ami

iþ1

running distance in this speed interval

Step 3 :

s = te × v o + ΣΔsi

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/347

ANNEX T

SPECIFIC CASES

Kinematic gauge

Great Britain

T.1. WAGONS INTENDED TO RUN ON BRITISH LINES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

347

T.1.1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

347

T.1.2. Section A — Gauge applicable to wagons in Great Britain (W6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

348

T.1.3. Section B — Sample Calculation for a W6-A Gauge Vehicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

351

T.1.4. Section C — W7 and W8 Gauges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

354

T.1.5. Section D — Special load gauge W9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

355

T.1. WAGONS INTENDED TO RUN ON THE BRITISH NETWORK

T.1.1. Introduction

The following freight wagon gauges are available on lines in Great Britain: W6, W7, W8 and W9. The Infrastructure
Manager shall list in the Infrastructure Register which gauge is available on a line. The gauges are described below in Section
A –W6, Section B — Sample Calculation, Section C — W7 and W8, Section D — W9. Application of these gauges is limited
to vehicles whose lateral suspension movement and sway is minimal. Vehicles with soft lateral suspension and/or large sway
shall be evaluated dynamically according to Notified National Standards.

Below 400 mm ARL, wagons shall comply with both reference profile and G1 and W6, taking whichever profile is more
limiting in size.

L 344/348

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

T.1.2. Section A — Gauge applicable to wagons in Great Britain (W6)

Figure T1

Note on the reduction formulae and other factors to be considered when applying the W6 gauge to freight
rolling stock

Area above 1 000 mm Above Rail Level (ARL)

General

This part of the gauge is to be considered static and the gauge width is unaffected by any lateral movements.

1 000 mm Dimension ARL

The 1 000 mm ARL dimension is an absolute minimum; no part of the wagon shall encroach vertically below this
value such that the gauge is fouled, under whatever condition of loading or wear. Vertical spring travel shall be
determined as the extreme movement to solid, or springstop condition.

Determination of Maximum Vehicle Width.

The 2 820 mm dimension on straight track (equivalent to 3 024 mm on curves with 200 m radius) is allowed without
application of the width reduction formulae.

Diagram for Width Reduction Formulae.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/349

Figure T2

A
Ni and No= distance in metres from the section in question to the nearest axle or bogie centre.

= wheelbase/bogie centres in metres.

Formulae to be applied for determination of the reduction above 1 000 ARL.

a)

Reduction Ei (metres) to be made on each side of the gauge at a section between axles/bogies:

Ei ¼

ANi − N2
i
400

− 0,102

b)

Reduction Eo (Eo in metres to be made on each side of the gauge at a section situated beyond the axles or bogie
centre:

Eo ¼

ANo þ N2
o
400

− 0,102

Note

— A negative value calculated from a) or b) above indicates that the reduction to be applied is nil.

— No reduction is necessary at the centre of the vehicle unless the distance between bogie centres exceeds 12,8 m.

— The width reduction formulae apply equally to all width co-ordinates of the upper profile.

— No increase in the width of this gauge is permitted even if the displacements on the curve are less than described

above.

Area below 1 000 mm ARL

General

This part of the gauge is simplified kinematic.

Due account shall be taken of all lateral displacements, however caused, i.e.:

(a)

(b)

(c)

full lateral suspension travel,

full lateral suspension wear,

curve throw (Ei or Eo).

The following shall not be included:

(d)

vehicle roll,

(e)

(f)

axleguard deflection,

wheel flange to rail clearance,

(g) wheel flange and rail wear.

L 344/350

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

All underclearance values shown are an absolute minimum; no part of the wagon must encroach vertically
downwards such that the gauge is infringed under whatever condition of loading or wear. Vertical spring travel must
be determined as the extreme movement to solid, or springstop condition.

Additionally, under the foregoing conditions of full vertical deflection and wear, the vehicle must not infringe the
gauge underclearances, relative to the 75, 100 and 135 mm ARL planes, when standing on a concave or convex
vertical curve of 500 m radius.

Determination of Maximum Vehicle Width

At any point of the vehicle, the combination of its:

(1) maximum static width, plus

(2)

the sum of values derived from 1.2.1 a), b) and c),

shall not exceed any one of the four values shown below:

Curve radius (R)

Straight| (*)

360 m

200 m

160 m

Maximum Width (1) + (2)

2 700 mm

2 700 mm

2 820 mm

2 900 mm

(*)

Included to encompass those components not subject to curve throw, e.g. axleboxes.

Diagram for Width Reduction Formulae

Figure T3

A

= wheelbase/bogie centres in metres.

NI and No

= distances in metres from the section in question to the nearest axle or bogie centre

R

= curve radius

Formulae to be applied for determination of the reduction below 1 000 ARL

a)

Reduction Ei (metres) to be applied on each side of the gauge at a section between axles/or bogie centres.

Ei ¼

ANi − N2
i
2R

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/351

b)

Reduction Eo (metres) to be made on each side of the gauge at a section situated beyond the axles or bogie
centres.

Ei ¼

ANo þ N2
o
R

Notes:

— Any width reduction derived from the above applies equally to all width co-ordinates of the lower profile.

— No increase in the width of this gauge is permitted.

T.1.3. Section B — Sample Calculation for a W6-A Gauge Vehicle

1.

Example

1.1. Two-axle covered wagon, to the following dimensions:

Wheelbase (A)
Length over headstocks
Full lateral suspension travel
Full lateral suspension interface wear

9 m
12,82 m
± 0,02 m
0,003 m

1.2. Area above 1 000 mm ARL

1.2.1. At centre of the vehicle

Ei ¼

ANi − N2
i
400

Ei = - 0,051 m

Ei is calculated as a negative value, hence no reduction is necessary.

1.3. At vehicle headstock

1.3.1.

Ei ¼

ANo þ N2
o
400

− 0,102

Eo = - 0,05 m

Eo is calculated as a negative value, hence no reduction is necessary.

1.4. Area below 1 000 m ARL

1.4.1. Total lateral suspension movements

1.4.1.1. (0,020 + 0,003) m = 23 mm (half-width reduction)

1.5. At axle centre line

1.5.1. Eo/Ei = zero

Therefore maximum width over axlebox components is:

2 700 - 2(23) = 2 654 mm

1.6. At centre of the vehicle

1.6.1.

Ei ¼

ANi − N2
i
R

L 344/352

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

(i)

for R = 360 m

Ei = 28 mm

Therefore maximum width at R = 360 m:

2 700 - 2(23) - 2(28) = 2 598 mm

(ii)

for R = 200 m

Ei = 51 mm

Therefore maximum width at R = 200 m:

2 820 - 2(23) - 2(51) = 2 672 mm

(iii)

for R = 160 m

Ei 63 mm

Therefore maximum width at R = 160 m:

2 900 - 2(23) - 2(63) = 2 728 mm

From the above it can be seen that case (i) produces the minimum value, and therefore the maximum permissible width at
the centre of the vehicle is thus 2 598 mm.

1.7. At vehicle headstock

1.7.1.

Ei ¼

ANo þ N2
o
R

(i)

for R = 360 mm

Eo = 29 mm

Therefore maximum width at R = 360 mm:

2 700 - 2(23) - 2(29) = 2 596 mm

(ii)

for R = 200 m

Eo = 52 mm

Therefore maximum width at R = 200 m:

2 820 - 2(23) - 2(52) = 2 670 mm

(iii)

For R = 160 m

Eo = 65 mm

Therefore maximum width at R = 160 m:

2 900 - 2(23) - 2(65) = 2 724 mm

From the above it can be seen that case (i) produces the minimum value, and therefore the maximum permissible
width at the vehicle headstock is thus 2 596 mm.

3.

Calculation of Vertical Displacements/Underclearances

3.1. Sprung Component Displacement

3.1.1.

a)
b)
c)

Allowable wheel wear
Hollow tread
spring, tare vehicle to springstop

38,0 mm
6,0 mm
98,5 mm

Total: 142,5 mm (en pratique 143 mm)

Note: This displacement can be reduced by the total thickness of one axle box cone-block packing assembly fitted to
compensate for wheel wear, on vehicles which have the facility to accept cone block packings.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/353

3.2. Unsprung Component Displacement

3.2.1.

d)
e)

(a) allowable wheel wear
(b) hollow tread

3.2.2.

3.3. Underclearances, at Centre of the Vehicle

3.3.1.

38 mm
6 mm

Total: 44 mm

38 mm
6 mm

The vertical displacement Hi of a vehicle standing on a 500 m radius convex vertical curve, is given by the formula:

Hi ¼

ANi − N2
i
R

Hi = 20 mm.

3.4. Underclearances, at Vehicle Headstock

3.4.1.

The vertical displacement Ho of a vehicle standing on a 500 m radius concave vertical curve, given by the formula:

Ho ¼

ANo þ N2
o
R

Ho = 21 mm

3.4.2.

Note: Values obtained as described in Clause 3.3 and 3.4 above are additional, for the 75, 100 and 135 mm ARL planes only,
to those calculated in Clause 3.1 and 3.2 above.

L 344/354

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

T.1.4. Section C — W7 and W8 Gauges

W7 Gauge

Fig. T4

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/355

W8 Gauge

Fig. T5

T.1.5. Section D — Special load gauge W9

— The wagon body and bogies shall be designed in accordance with the W6 gauge.

— When loaded onto a wagon, a demountable load shall comply with the W9 gauge described below.

1.1. The W9 gauge has two distinct parts that shall both be complied with:

W9 (i) , this applies to load units situated between the bogie centres. [NB (i) denotes ‘inner’].

W9 (o), this applies to load units situated on the wagon overhang i.e., between end bogie and the corresponding usable end
of the wagon loading plane. [NB (o) denotes ‘outer’].

L 344/356

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Reference profile of the gauge W9 (i) inner

Fig. T6

Container wagons have different positions for different sized Intermodal Units. These intermodal units loaded on container
wagons are not fixed in position either laterally or longitudinally. All loading alignments and possible movement during
journeys shall be taken into account for both W9 (i) and W9 (o).

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/357

2.

Notes on the reduction formulae and other factors to be considered in the application of Gauge W9

2.1. Gauge W9 (i) is specified for a wagon with a bogie-centre distance of 13,5 m. No increase in the width of the gauge
shall be permitted for wagons with a bogie-centre distance of less than 13,5 m but a reduction in the width of the
gauge shall be made for wagons with a bogie-centre distance greater than 13,5 m.

2.1.1. Area above 1 000 mm ARL

2.1.1.1. General

2.1.1.2.

This part of gauge W9 (i) shall be considered as static and the gauge width is unaffected by lateral movements of the
suspension up to a limiting value of 13 mm (including wear).

The W9 (i) gauge width shall, be reduced in width, either side of the centre line, by an amount corresponding to the lateral
movements of the suspension exceeding the limiting value of 13 mm.

The 1 000 mm area above rail level, at a width of 2 796 mm, is an absolute minimum. No part of the load unit shall
encroach vertically downwards such that the gauge is infringed under whatever condition of loading or wear. Vertical spring
travel shall be determined as the extreme movement to solid, or springstop condition.

Area comprised between 1 000 mm and 780 mm ARL

Fig. T6

Note: Generally the greatest reduction is obtained when Ni = A/2.

1.1.3. Reduction Ei (metres) to be made on each side of the gauge at a section between axles/bogies:

Ei ¼

ANi − N2
i
400

− 0,114

L 344/358

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Note

— A negative value calculated from the above Clause 1.1.3 indicates that the reduction to be applied is nil.

— No reduction is necessary at the centre of the vehicle unless the distance between bogie centres exceeds 13,5 m.

The width reduction formula applies equally to all width co-ordinates in the area exceeding 1 000 mm ARL.

Area between 1 000 mm and 780 mm ARL

2.1. General

2.1.1. This part of the W9 (i) gauge is simplified kinematic

Due account shall be taken of all lateral displacements, however caused:

a)

b)

c)

d)

Full lateral suspension travel,

Full lateral suspension interface wear,

Reduction due to curve throw Ei

Load unit movement described in the introduction to Annex 5 Section D.

The following shall not be included:

e)

f)

Vehicle roll

Axleguard deflection

g) Wheel flange to rail clearance

h) Wheel flange and rail wear

2.1.3. Area below 780 mm ARL

2.1.3.1.

No part of the load unit complying with the W9 (i) shall project into this area under any condition of load or wear except
where this part of the load unit complies with W6 gauge.

2.1.4. Determination of W9 (i) gauge widths

Fig. T7

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/359

2.1.5. At any point of the vehicle, the combination of its:

(i) maximum static width, plus

(ii)

the sum of values derived from 2.1.1 a), b), c) and d)

shall not exceed any one of the three values shown below:

Curve radius (R)
360 m
200 m
160 m

maximum width (i) + (ii)
2 810 mm
2 912 mm
2 970 mm

2.1.5.1. Reduction Ei (metres) to be made on each side of the gauge at a section between bogies:

Ei ¼

ANi − N2
i
R

2.1.6.2. Note: Any width reduction derived from the above applies equally to all width co-ordinates in the area between

1 000 mm and 780 mm ARL. No increase in width of this gauge is permitted.

3.

Sample calculation

3.1. Width reductions calculated in accordance with data relating to W9 (i) gauge.

3.1.1. Bogie wagon, to the following dimensions:

Distance between bogie centres (A)
Length of loadable platform
Full lateral suspension travel, including interface wear

Full lateral movement of load unit in relation to securing device

13,5 m
15,9 m
13 mm (i.e. not in excess of the standard
value of 13 mm)
12,5 mm (i.e. 6,5 mm more than the
standard value of 6 mm)

3.2. Area above 1 000 mm ARL

3.2.1. At the centre of the wagon

Ei ¼

ANi − N2
i
400

− 0,114

Ei ¼

13,5 (cid:2) 6,75 − 6,752
400

− 0,114

Ei = - 0,00009, i.e. no reduction due to curve overthrow.

3.2.2. Overall gauge reduction

= Ei + excess lateral suspension travel + excess load unit movement

= 0 + 0 + 6,5 mm.

Therefore all horizontal co-ordinates of the W9 (i) gauge, in the area exceeding 1 000 mm ARL, shall be reduced by 6,5
mm on each side of the gauge.

3.3. Area comprised between 1 000 mm and 780 mm ARL

3.3.1.

Total lateral suspension travel = 13 mm.

Excess lateral travel of load unit = 6,5 mm.

L 344/360

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

3.3.2.

At centre of wagon:

Ei ¼

ANi − N2
i
2R

(i)

For R = 360 m

Ei = 63 mm

Therefore maximum width at R = 360 m will be:

2 810 - (2x63) - (2x13) - (2 x 6,5) = 2 645 mm

(ii)

For R = 200 m

Ei = 114 mm

Therefore maximum width at R = 200 m will be:

2912 - (2 x 114) - (2 x 13) - (2 x 6,5) = 2 645 mm

(iii)

For R = 160 m

Ei 142 mm

Therefore maximum width at R = 160 m will be:

2 970 - (2 x 142) - (2 x 13) - (2 x 6,5) = 2 647 mm

The above cases (i) and (ii) both produce a minimum value and therefore the maximum permissible width of the load unit at
the centre of the loadable deck length is thus 2 645 mm.

4.

Notes on the reduction formulae and other factors to be considered in the application of Gauge W9 (o)

4.1. Gauge W9 (o) is specified for a wagon with a distance of 13,5 m between bogie centres. No increase in gauge width is
permitted for wagons with a distance of less than 13,5 m between bogie centres. However, a gauge reduction shall be
applied for wagons with a distance greater than 13,5 m between bogie centres.

4.1.1. Area above 1 000 mm ARL

4.1.1.1. General

This part of gauge W9 (o) is to be considered as static and the gauge width is unaffected by lateral travel of the suspension
up to a limiting value of 13 mm.

However the W9 (o) gauge shall be reduced in width, either side of the centre line, by the amount by which the total lateral
suspension travels exceeds the standard limiting value of 13 mm.

Any load unit movement allowed by the restraining mechanisms e.g. spigots in excess of 6 mm laterally shall further reduce
the width either side of the centreline.

The area 1 000 mm above rail level is an absolute minimum with a width of 2 796 mm. No part of the load unit shall
encroach vertically downwards such that the gauge is fouled under any condition of loading or wear. Vertical spring travel
shall be determined as the extreme movement to solid, or springstop.

A width of 2 796 mm on straight track (equivalent to 3 024 mm on curves of 200mm radius) shall be allowed without
width reduction.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/361

4.1.2.1. Diagram for Width Reduction Formula

Fig. T7

Note: Generally the reduction is greatest when No = maximum.

4.1.3. Formula to be applied for determination of the reduction above 1 000 mm ARL

4.1.3.1.

Reduction Eo (metres) to be made on each side of the gauge at a section between bogies and the end of the loadable wagon
platform.

Eo ¼

ANo þ N2
o
400

− 0,114

4.1.3.2. Note

— A negative value calculated indicates that nil reduction is necessary.

— No reduction is necessary unless the distance to the end of the loadable decks exceeds 2,798 m for a wagon with

bogie centres equal to 13,5m.

The width reduction formula applies equally to all width co-ordinates in the area exceeding 1 000 mm above rail ARL.

Area ≤ 1 000 mm ARL

4.2.2. Area below 1 000 mm ARL

4.2.2.1.

This part of the W9 (o) gauge is kinematic, and the gauge is to be determined precisely in accordance with the
reference profile W6, except that the permitted widths must be further reduced dependent upon the load unit
securing method.

The area 1 000 mm above rail level is an absolute minimum with a width of 2 796 mm. No part of the load unit shall
encroach vertically downwards such that the gauge is fouled under any condition of loading or wear. Vertical spring travel
shall be determined as the extreme movement to solid, or springstop.

L 344/362

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

4.2.2.2. Determination of gauge widths

At any point of the vehicle, the combination of its:

(i) maximum static width, plus

(ii)

the sum of values derived from 2.1.1 a), b), c) and d)

shall not exceed any one of the three values shown below:

4.2.2.3.

Curve radius (R)
360 m
200 m
160 m

maximum width (i) + (ii)
2 710 mm
2 820 mm
2 900 mm

Fig. T8

A
No

= distance between bogie centres (in metres)
= distance from section in question to the nearest bogie centre (in metres)

Note: the reduction is at its greatest when No = A/2

R

= curve radius (in metres)

Formula to be applied for the determination of reductions below 1 000 mm ARL

Reduction Eo (in metres) to be made on each side of the gauge at a section between bogie and the end of the loadable wagon
platform:

Ei ¼

ANo þ N2
o
R

Note

— Any width reduction derived from the above applies equally to all width co-ordinates, within the area of less than

1 000 mm ARL.

— No increase in the width of this gauge is permitted.

Width reductions calculated in accordance with data relating to W9 (o) gauge.

Sample calculation

Width reductions calculated in accordance with data relating to the W9 (o) gauge

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/363

Bogie wagon, to the following dimensions:

Distance between bogie centre pins (A)
Length of loadable platform
Full lateral suspension travel, including interface wear
Full lateral movement of load unit by reference to securing
device

13,5 m
15,9 m
13 mm (i.e. not in excess of the standard value of 13 mm)
12,5 mm (i.e. 6,5 mm more than the standard value of 6 mm)

Area above 1 000 mm ARL

At the end of the load unit

− 0,114 where No ¼

15,9 − 13,5
2

¼ 1,2

Eo ¼

ANo þ N2
o
400

Eo = - 0,070 m

Total gauge reduction

= Eo + excess lateral suspension travel + excess load unit movement

= - 70 + 0 + 6,5 = - 63,5 mm, i.e. negative therefore no reduction needed.

Area below 1 000 mm ARL

Total Lateral Suspension Travel = 13mm

Excess Lateral Travel of Load Unit = 6,5 mm

At the end of the load unit:

Eo ¼

ANo þ N2
o
2R

(i)

For R = 360 m

Eo = 24,5 mm

Therefore maximum width at R = 360 m:

2 700 - (2 × 24,5) - (2 × 13) - (2 × 6,5) = 2 612 mm

(ii)

For R = 200 m

Eo = 44 mm

Therefore maximum width at R = 200 m:

2 820 - (2 × 44) - (2 × 13) - (2 × 6,5) = 2 693 mm

(iii)

For R = 160 m

Eo = 55 mm

Therefore maximum width at R = 160 m:

2 900 - (2 × 55) - (2 × 13) - (2 × 6,5) = 2 751 mm

Case (i) produces a minimum value, and therefore the maximum permissible width of the load unit at the end of the
loadable deck length is thus 2 612 mm.

L 344/364

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

ANNEX U

SPECIFIC CASES

Kinematic gauge

1 520 mm track gauge

U.1 WAGONS FOR BOTH 1520 MM AND 1435 MM TRACKS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

U.2 WAGONS FOR ONLY 1520 MM TRACKS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

U.3 PASSING OVER TRANSITION CURVES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

U.4 PASSING OVER VERTICAL TRANSITION CURVES (INCLUDING MARSHALLING YARD HUMPS) AND
OVER BRAKING, SHUNTING OR STOPPING DEVICES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

U.5 ABILITY TO COUPLE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

364

366

367

368

369

This specific case applies to selected lines in Poland and Slovakia whose gauge is 1 520 mm, which links to lines in
Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia.

U.1. WAGONS FOR BOTH 1 520 MM AND 1 435 MM TRACKS

Interoperability wagons for 1 520 mm and 1 435 mm network to operate without any limitation on both networks should
be comply with the kinematic gauge shown in fig. U1.

Fig. U1

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/365

The upper parts of certain wagons used in bilateral and multilateral agreements may conform to the gauge in fig. U2.

Fig.U2

For the lower parts of these wagons the kinematic gauge should comply with fig.U3.

Fig.U3

L 344/366

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

U.2. WAGONS FOR ONLY 1 520 MM TRACKS

These freight wagons may comply with kinematic gauges WM-02, WM-1 and WM-0 .

Fig. U4

Kinematic gauge WM-2

Fig.U5

Kinematic gauge WM-1

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/367

Fig. U6

Lower parts for kinematic gauge WM-02, 1, 0

U.3. PASSING OVER TRANSITION CURVES

Individual wagons, both loaded and unloaded should negotiate curves with a radius of 80 m.

On 1 520 mm tracks wagons both loaded and unloaded, coupled to form a train shall negotiate;

— the transition between straight track and 80 m radius curve without transitory curves.

— ‘S’ curves of 120 m radius without transitory straight tracks

On 1 520 mm tracks long wagons (spacing of king-pins > 16 m and length with couplers > 21 m) both loaded and
unloaded, coupled to form a train should negotiate;

— the transition between straight track and 110 m radius curve without transitory curves.

— ‘S’ curves with a radius of 160 m without transitory straight tracks

On 1 435 mm tracks wagons both loaded and unloaded, coupled to form a train should negotiate;

— ‘S’ curves with a radius of 190 m without transitory straight tracks

— ‘S’ curves with a radius of 150 m with a transitory straight track 6 m in length

— ‘S’ curves with a radius of 120 m with a transitory straight track 20 m in length

L 344/368

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

U.4. PASSING OVER VERTICAL TRANSITION CURVES (INCLUDING MARSHALLING YARD HUMPS) AND OVER

BRAKING, SHUNTING OR STOPPING DEVICES.

Passing over vertical profiles as shown in figs. U7 and U8 shall be possible without disconnection of the automatic couplers.

Fig. U7

First track retarder before first turnout

Fig. U8

First track retarder after first turnout

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/369

U.5. ABILITY TO COUPLE

Wagons with automatic couplers both loaded and unloaded shall allow coupling in the following conditions;

— without manual (hand) support

— on straight tracks

— on transition from straight track into a curve with a radius of 135 m without transitory straight track

— on curves with a radius of 150 m

— manually (with hand support)

— on ‘S’ curves with a radius of 190 m without transitory straight track

— on ‘S’ curves with a radius of 150 m with a transitory straight track 6 m in length

Long wagons (spacing of king-pins > 16 m and length with couplers > 21 m) both loaded and unloaded with automatic
couplers shall allow coupling in the following conditions:

— without manual (hand) support

— on straight tracks

— on transition from straight track into a curve with a radius of 150 m without transitory straight track

— on curves with a radius of 150 m

— manually (with hand support)

— on ‘S’ curves with a radius of 190 m without transitory straight track

— on ‘S’ curves with a radius of 150 m with a transitory straight track 6 m in length

L 344/370

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

ANNEX V

SPECIFIC CASE

Braking performance

Great Britain

V.1. PARKING BRAKE FOR FREIGHT WAGONS INTENDED FOR USE ON THE GREAT BRITAIN NETWORK

Specification for parking brake: For new wagons used in the UK: every wagon has to be equipped. For wagons to be used
solely in the UK, a parking brake shall be designed such that fully loaded wagons shall be held on a gradient of 2,5 % with a
maximum of 10 % adhesion with no wind.

V.2. EQUIVALENT BRAKE FORCE & BRAKE FORCE FACTORS FOR FREIGHT WAGONS INTENDED FOR USE ON THE

GREAT BRITAIN NETWORK

Freight wagons operating in the UK shall have the equivalent brake force and, if applicable, any brake force factors
calculated. Freight wagons operating in member states other than the UK shall have the brake weight/braked weight
percentage calculated. Freight wagons required to operate in the UK and other member states shall have both equivalent
brake force/brake force factors and brake weight/braked weight percentage calculated. The keeper shall be required to obtain
this information and enter it into the Rolling Stock Register.

Brake Force

The force applied to the brake block/pad/braking surface interface.

Equivalent Brake Force

Is the value of brake force that needs to be exerted on an equivalent tread brake arrangement with a standard coefficient of
friction, to produce the same value of brake retarding force as that given by the actual combination of brake force and
coefficient of friction on the vehicle.

Brake Force Factors

These are factors that enable the UK TOPS computer system to calculate the brake force on a rail vehicle fitted with a device
that varies the brake force in proportion to the vehicle mass.

Calculation of Brake Force Data

i)

Vehicles with either a single value of brake force, or values fixed for the tare and laden conditions.

The approach defined in this section shall also be used for coaching stock, even though they may have a brake force
that varies with the vehicle load. The value of equivalent brake force calculated shall be that for the tare condition of
the vehicle.

The equivalent brake force is the total for the vehicle and is directly related to the vehicle brake retarding force acting
at the rail.

The declared value of brake force is used directly as an index of the braking ability of the vehicle and to be consistent
with existing values, is the force that needs to be exerted on an equivalent tread brake arrangement to give the same
brake retarding force at the rail, using a standard mean coefficient of friction at the friction braking interface. The
standard mean coefficient of friction historically used, as the basis for the calculations, is 0,13.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/371

The equivalent brake forces as required above, must be calculated from the brake retarding force as follows:

BT ¼

FT
0,13 (cid:2) 9,81

and

BL ¼

FL
0,13 (cid:2) 9,81

Where:

the equivalent brake force to be for the rail vehicle in tare condition (tonnes).
the equivalent brake force to be declared for the rail vehicle in laden condition (tonnes).

BT =
BL =
FT & FL = the vehicle brake retarding force, appropriate for the tare or laden condition respectively, that acts at the
rail and over the period during which the brake cylinder pressure has reached at least 95 % of its maximum
value (kN).
the standard mean coefficient of friction (-).
acceleration due to gravity (m/s2).

0,13 =
9,81 =

ii)

Vehicles with a value of brake force that varies in proportion to the load

For those vehicles for which it is necessary to calculate brake force factors, that are in the form of a constant and a
variable component, these shall be calculated as follows:

(a)

Brake force factor 1 = CL or CT (tonnes)

where CL = BL - (m × WL)

and CT = BT - (m × WT)

See below for the derivation of m

(b)

Brake force factor 2 ¼

Þ
ð
BL − BT
WL − WT

ð

Þ

¼ m (tonnes/tonne)

Where

BL = Equivalent brake force in max laden condition (tonnes).
BT = Equivalent brake force in tare condition (tonnes)
WL = Max laden mass (tonnes)
WT = Tare mass (tonnes)

The values of brake force factor calculated at (a) & (b) above are to be recorded in the Rolling Stock Register.

iii)

Factors to be considered in the derivation of brake force

The brake retarding force for a vehicle can be calculated from design data or derived from the results of braking
distance tests, in either case this must be from the rail vehicle maximum speed. Where actual tests are undertaken, the
value of equivalent brake force calculated must be validated.

For tread braked vehicles, the brake retarding force is calculated from the product of the total value of the brake force
and the coefficient of friction between the brake blocks and wheel tread. In the case of a disc brake, it is the product of
the brake force, coefficient of friction and the ratio of effective radius at which the disc pad acts and the new wheel
radius of the vehicle.

When calculating brake retarding force, account must taken of any losses due to rigging efficiency, or slack adjusters
within the brake force application system, between the brake cylinder and brake blocks or pads. If a reliable value for
brake force cannot be derived, it should be measured directly at the block or pad. In this case account must be taken of
the effects of vibration on the value of static friction in the rigging.

The coefficient of friction used must take account of all influencing aspects, such as the brake force, the area of the
friction material and vehicle speed, as all these factors affect the value of the coefficient of friction. For example, for a
given brake block area, increasing block loads and speeds will reduce the effective value of the coefficient of friction
for cast iron brake blocks.

L 344/372

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

If there is no data available giving the coefficient of friction for particular combinations of load, speed and area of the
friction interface, tests must be undertaken to establish a value, if it is used to calculate brake retarding force.

Where there is one vehicle number to cover vehicles that are semi-permanently coupled by bar type couplers or are
articulated, the correct brake retarding force must be calculated for each distributor by using the vehicle weight
controlled by each distributor.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/373

ANNEX W

SPECIFIC CASES

Kinematic gauge

FINLAND, STATIC GAUGE FIN1

W.1. General rules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

374

W.2. Lower part of the vehicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

374

W.3. Vehicle parts in proximity of the wheel flanges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

374

W.4. Vehicle width . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

374

W.5. Lower step and access doors opening outwards for coaches and multiple units . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

374

W.6. Pantographs and non-insulated live parts on the roof . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

375

W.7. Rules and later instructions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

375

VEHICLE GAUGES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

376

FIN1/Appendix A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

376

FIN1/Appendix B1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

377

INCREASE OF THE MINIMUM HEIGHT OF THE LOWER PART OF THE VEHICLE ABLE TO PASS OVER
MARSHALLING HUMPS AND RAIL BRAKES 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

377

FIN1/Appendix B2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

378

INCREASE OF THE MINIMUM HEIGHT OF THE LOWER PART OF THE VEHICLE UNABLE TO PASS OVER
MARSHALLING HUMPS AND RAIL BRAKES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

378

FIN1/Appendix B3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

379

LOCATION OF THE RAIL BRAKES AND OTHER SHUNTING DEVICES OF MARSHALLING HUMPS . . . . .

379

FIN1/Appendix C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

380

REDUCTION OF THE HALF-WIDTH ACCORDING TO THE VEHICLE GAUGE FIN1,
(REDUCTION
FORMULAE) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

380

FIN1/Appendix D1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

382

GAUGE OF THE VEHICLE LOWER STEP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

382

FIN1/Appendix D2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

383

GAUGE OF OUTWARDS OPENING DOORS AND OF OPENED STEPS FOR COACHES AND MULTIPLE
UNITS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

383

FIN1/Appendix E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

385

PANTOGRAPH AND NON-INSULATED LIVE PARTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

385

L 344/374

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

W.1. GENERAL RULES

1.1. The vehicle gauge determines the space where the vehicle should be inside when it is in middle position on a straight

track. The reference contour (FIN1) is given in Appendix A.

1.2. To define the lowest position of the various parts of the vehicle (lower part, parts in the proximity of the flanges) in

relation to the track, the displacements hereafter should be considered:

— Maximum wears

— Flexibility of suspensions up to the buffers. For grounds which will be made clear, the flexibility of springs has to

be taken into account according to the ranking of the UIC Leaflet 505-1.

— Static deflection of the frame

— Mounting and construction tolerances

1.3.

For the definition of the highest location of the various parts of the vehicle, the vehicle is supposed empty, not worn
and with mounting and construction tolerances.

W.2. LOWER PART OF THE VEHICLE

The minimum height allowed for the lower parts should be increased according to Appendix B1 for vehicles able to pass
over marshalling yard humps and rail brakes.

The vehicles not allowed passing over marshalling yard humps and rail brakes can have a minimum height increased
according to Appendix B2.

W.3. VEHICLE PARTS IN PROXIMITY OF THE WHEEL FLANGES

3.1. The minimum vertical distance allowed for vehicle parts located in the vicinity of the wheel flanges, except the wheel
themselves, is 55 mm from the running surface. In curves those parts should remain inside the zone occupied by the
wheels.

This distance of 55 mm does not apply to the flexible parts of the sanding system or to the flexible brushes.

3.2.

In exception for the point 3.1, the minimum vertical distance allowed for parts beyond end axles is 125 mm, for
vehicles which are retarded by a movable, manually on the rail placed drag shoe.

3.3. The minimum distance of brake components which should come in contact with the rail can be smaller than 55 mm
from the rail when the components are stationary. They should be located inside the zone between axles and even in
curves remain inside the zone occupied by the wheels. The components should not affect operation on shunting
devices.

W.4. VEHICLE WIDTH

4.1

Transverse half-width dimensions allowed on straight track and in curve should be reduced according to Appendix C.

W.5. LOWER STEP AND ACCESS DOORS OPENING OUTWARDS FOR COACHES AND MULTIPLE UNITS

5.1

The gauge of the lower step of coaches and multiple units is given in Appendix D1.

5.2. The gauge in open position of access doors opening outwards on coaches and multiple units is given in Appendix D2.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/375

W.6. PANTOGRAPHS AND NON-INSULATED LIVE PARTS ON THE ROOF

6.1. The lowered pantograph in middle position on a straight track should not protrude out the vehicle gauge.

6.2. The raised pantograph in middle position on a straight track should not protrude out the vehicle gauge given in

Appendix E.

The transverse displacements of a pantograph due to oscillations and track inclination and tolerances should be
separately taken into account at the time of the installation of the electric line.

6.3.

If the pantograph is not above the centre of the bogie, the lateral displacement due to the curves should also be taken
into account.

6.4. Non-insulated parts (25 kV) on the roof should not penetrate the zone indicated in Appendix E.

W.7. RULES AND LATER INSTRUCTIONS

7.1. Besides items W.1-W.6, the vehicles designed for the western traffic also comply with prescriptions of UIC Leaflets

505-1 or 506.

The lower part of the vehicles able to board ferries should later comply with UIC Leaflet 507 (wagons) or 569
(coaches and vans).

7.2. Besides items W.1-W.6, the vehicles designed for the traffic with Russia also comply with prescriptions of norm GOST

9238-83. In any case, the usual gauge should be complied with.

7.3. A separate regulation is used for gauging trainsets made up of vehicle with tilting body systems.

7.4.

Loading gauges are dealt with by a separate regulation.

L 344/376

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

VEHICLE GAUGES

FIN1/Appendix A

Figure W.1

1)

2)

3)

4)

Lower part of the vehicles able to pass over marshalling humps and rail brakes.

Lower part of the vehicles unable to pass over marshalling humps and rail brakes except for bogies of powered units,
see note 3).

Lower part of the bogies of powered units unable to pass over marshalling humps and rail brakes.

Gauge of the vehicles able to run on lines individuated in Jtt (technical specifications related to Finnish Railway's safety
standards), where the obstacle gauge has been accordingly widened.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/377

Increase of the minimum height of the lower part of the vehicle able to pass over marshalling humps and rail
brakes

FIN1/Appendix B1

The height of the lower part of vehicles should be increased by Eas and Eau so that:

— if the vehicle runs on the top of a hump, no part between bogie pivots or between end axles could penetrate the

running surface of a hump the vertical curvature radius of which is 250 m;

— if the vehicle runs in the concavity of the hump, no part beyond bogie pivots or beyond end axles could penetrate the

gauge of rail brakes of a concavity the vertical curvature radius of which is 300 m.

The formulae to (1) to calculate the height increase, are (values in metres):

Eas ¼

an − n2
500

− h

Eau ¼

an þ n2
600

Eau ¼

an þ n2
600

Þ
− h − 0,275

ð

Notations:

at a distance up to 1,445 m from the centreline of the track

at a distance greater than 1,445 m from the centreline of the track

Eas = height increase of the lower part of the vehicle in cross sections between bogie pivots or between end axles. Eas

should not be taken into account unless its value is positive;

Eau = height increase of the lower part of the vehicle in cross sections beyond bogie pivots or beyond end axles. Eau should

not be taken into account unless its value is positive;
distance between bogie pivots or between end axles;
distance from the cross section considered to the nearest bogie pivot (or the nearest end axle);
height of the lower part of the vehicles above the running surface (see Appendix A).

a =
n =
h =

(1)

Formulae are based on the position of a rail brake and other shunting devices of marshalling humps shown in Appendix B3.

L 344/378

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Increase of the minimum height of the lower part of the vehicle unable to pass over marshalling humps and rail
brakes

FIN1/Appendix B2

The height of the lower part of vehicles should be increased by E’as and E’au so that:

— if the vehicle runs over a concave track transition, no part between bogie pivots or between end axles could penetrate

the running surface of the track transition the vertical curvature radius of which is 500 m;

— if the vehicle runs over a concave track transition, no part beyond bogie pivots or beyond end axles could penetrate

the running surface of the track transition the vertical curvature radius of which is 500 m.

The formulae (1) to calculate the height increase are (values in metres)

E0

as ¼

an − n2
1000

− h

E0

au ¼

an þ n2
1000

− h

Notations:

E’as= Height increase of the lower part of the vehicle in cross sections between bogie pivots or between end axles.

E’as should not be taken into account unless its value is positive.

E’au = Height increase of the lower part of the vehicle in cross sections between bogie pivots or between end axles.

E’au should not be taken into account unless its value is positive.
distance between bogie pivots or between end axles;
distance from the cross section considered to the nearest bogie pivot (or the nearest end axle)
height of the lower part of the vehicles above the running surface (see Appendix A).

a =
n =
h =

(1)

Formulae are based on the vehicle gauge for tracks on marshalling humps as shown in Appendix B3

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/379

LOCATION OF THE RAIL BRAKES AND OTHER SHUNTING DEVICES OF MARSHALLING HUMPS

FIN1/Appendix B3

Figure W.2

PASSING TRACKS:

On the passing tracks of marshalling humps Rmin = 500 m, and the height of obstacle gauge above the running surface is
h = 0 mm across the whole vehicle gauge width (= 1 700 mm from track centreline). The longitudinal area where h = 0
spreads from the point of 20 m before the convex area on the top of the hump to the point of 20 m after the concave area
at the valley of the hump. The obstacle gauge for the marshalling yard is valid outside this area (RAMO item 2.9 and
RAMO 2 Annex 2, related to the gauge of marshalling yards, and also RAMO 2 Annex 5 related to the points of crossings).

L 344/380

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

FIN1/Appendix C

Reduction of the half-width according to the vehicle gauge FIN1, (reduction formulae)

1.

General rules

The cross dimensions of the vehicles computed according to the vehicle gauge (Appendix A) should be decreased by the
quantities Es or Eu, so that, when the vehicle is in its least favourable position (without inclination on its suspension) and on
a track of radius R = 150 m, with a track gauge of 1,544 m, no part of the vehicle protrude the half-width of the vehicle
gauge FIN1 by more than (36/R + k) from the track centreline.

The centreline of the vehicle gauge coincides with the track centreline, this one being inclined if the track is canted.

Reductions are calculated according to formulae given in chapter 2.

2.

Reduction formulae (in metres)

2.1

Sections between bogie pivots or between end axles

Es ¼

an − n2
2R

þ

p2
8R

þ

l − d
2

þ q þ wiR −

(cid:19)

þ k

(cid:18)

36
R

Es∞ ¼

l − d
2

þ q þ w∞ − k

2.2 Sections beyond bogie pivots or beyond end axles (vehicles with a overhang)

Eu ¼

an þ n2
2R

−

p2
8R

þ

(cid:18)

l − d
2

(cid:19)

þ q

2n þ a
a

þ wiR

n
a

þ waR

n þ a
a

−

(cid:18)

36
R

(cid:19)

þ k

Eu∞ ¼

(cid:18)

l − d
2

þ q þ w∞

(cid:19)

2n þ a
a

− k

Notations:

Es, Es ∞ =

reduction of the gauge half-width for cross sections between bogie pivots or between end axles. Es and
Es∞ should not be taken into account unless their values are positive;

Eu , Eu∞ = reduction of the gauge half-width for cross sections beyond bogie pivots or beyond end axles. Eu and Eu∞

a =
n =

p =
q =

wiR =

waR =
w∞ =
l =
d =

R =

should not be taken into account unless their values are positive;
distance between bogie pivots or between end axles (1);
distance between the cross section considered and the nearest bogie pivot, or the nearest end axle or the
fictional pivot if the vehicle has no fixed pivot;
bogie wheelbase;
is the sum of the play between the axle box and the axle itself and of the possible play between the axle
box and the bogie frame measured from the middle position with ultimately worn components;
possible transverse displacement of the bogie pivot, and the cradle in relation to the bogie frame or, for
vehicles without bogie pivot, possible displacement of the bogie frame in relation to the vehicle frame
measured from the middle position towards the internal side of the curve (varies according to the curve
radius);
comme wiR , but towards the outside of the curve;
as wiR , but on a straight track, from the middle position and towards both side;
maximum track gauge in straight and in considered curved track = 1,544 m;
distance between ultimately worn wheel
= 1,492 m;
curve radius;

flanges, measured 10 mm outwards the running circle

If w is constant or varies linearly according to 1/R, the radius to be considered is 150 m.

In exceptional cases, the actual value of R ≥ 150 m should be used.

(1)

If the vehicle has no actual bogie pivot, a and n should be determined on the base of a fictional pivot located at the intersection of the
longitudinal centrelines of the bogie and of the frame, the vehicle being in middle position (0,026 + q + w = 0) on a curved track of
radius 150 m. If the distance between the pivot calculated by this manner and the bogie centre point is denoted y, the term p2 should be
replaced by p2 - y2 in reduction formulae.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/381

k =

allowable gauge protrusion (to be increased by the 36/R widening of obstacle gauge) without the inclination
due to the suspension flexibility;

= 0 for h < 330 mm for vehicles able to run over rail brakes (see Appendix B1),

= 0,060 m for h < 600 mm,

= 0,075 m for h ≥ 600 mm .

h =

height above the running surface at the considered location, the vehicle being in its lowest position.

3.

Reduction values

The half-width of vehicle cross-sections should be decreased:

3.1

For sections between bogie pivots;

By the greater of values Es and Es∞ .

3.2 For sections beyond bogie pivots;

By the greater of values Eu and Eu∞.

L 344/382

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

FIN1/Appendix D1

GAUGE OF THE VEHICLE LOWER STEP

1.

This norm concerns the step used either for high (550/1 800) or for low platforms (265/1 600).

To avoid a uselessly wide gap between the step and the platform edge and taking account of the lower vehicle step and
of high platforms (550/1 800 mm), the value 1,700 - E can be exceeded in compliance with Appendix C, if a fixed
step is concerned. In such a case, the calculations hereafter should be applied which allow checking that, in spite of the
protrusion, the step will not reach the platform. The coach should be examined in its lowest position in relation to the
running surface.

2.

Distance between the track centreline and the platform:

3.

Room required for the step : L ¼ 1,800 þ

36
R

− t

3.1

Step located between bogie pivots: As ¼ B þ

an − n2
2R

þ

p2
8R

þ

l − d
2

þ q þ wiR

3.2 Step located beyond bogie pivots:

Au − B þ

an þ n2
2R

−

p2
8R

þ

(cid:18)

l − d
2

(cid:19)

þ q

2n þ a
a

þ wiR

n
a

þ waR

n þ a
a

4.

Notations (values in metres):

As , Au = distance between the track centreline and the outer edge of a step;
B =
a =
n =
p =
q =

distance between the vehicle centreline and the outer edge of the step;
distance between bogie pivots or between end axles;
distance of the step cross section most remote from the bogie pivot;
bogie wheel base;
possible transverse displacement due to the play between the axle and the axle box added with the play
between the axle box and the bogie frame measured from the middle position with ultimately worn
components;
possible transverse displacement of the bogie pivot and the cradle, measured from the middle position
towards the internal side of the curve;
waR =
comme wiR , but towards the outside of the curve;
wiR/aR = maximum value in considered curved track (for fixed steps);

wiR =

= 0,005 m (for controlled steps which for v ≤ 5 km/h unfurl automatically);

l =
d =
R =
t =

maximum track gauge in straight and in considered curved track = 1,544 m;
distance between ultimately worn wheel flanges, measured 10 mm outwards the running circle = 1,492 m;
Curve radius =500 m …. ∞;
allowed tolerance (0,020 m)
maintenance actions.

towards the platform between two

for the displacement of

the rail

5.

Rules related to the transverse distance between the step and the platform:

5.1 Distance AV = L - As/u should be at least 0,020 m.

5.2 On a straight track, with a coach in its middle position and a platform in its nominal location, a 150 mm distance
between vehicle and platform is considered as sufficiently small. Anyway the smallest value should be sought for this
distance. In the opposite case, the check is made on a straight and on a curved track where As/u is maximum.

6.

Gauge check

Gauge check for the lower steps should be carried out on a straight track and on a 500 m curve, if value w is constant
or varies linearly according to 1/R. Otherwise, the check should be carried out on a straight track and on curve where
As/u is maximum.

7.

Display of the outputs

Formulae used, inserted and resulting values should be displayed in an easily understood manner.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/383

FIN1/Appendix D2

Gauge of outwards opening doors and of opened steps for coaches and multiple units

1.

To avoid a uselessly wide gap between the step and the platform edge, the value 1,700 — E (see UIC Leaflet 560
§ 1.1.4.2) can be exceeded in compliance with Appendix C, in the design of an outwards opening door with a step in
open or closed position, or when the door and the step are moving between open and closed positions. In this case
the checks hereafter should be carried out, among others to evidence that, in spite of the additional displacement,
neither the door nor the step interfere with the fixed equipment (RAMO item 2.9 Annex 2). In the calculations the
coach should be examined in its lowest position in relation to the running surface.

Hereafter, the word door includes the step as well.

NOTE: Appendix D2 may also be used to check the outer rear-view mirror of a loco and motor car the mirror being in
open position. During normal line traffic the mirror is closed in a position recessed inside the body gauge.

2.

The distance between the track centreline and the fixed equipment is: L ¼ AT þ

36
R

− t;

AT =

1,800 m when h < 600 mm,

AT =

1,920 m when 600 < h ≤ 1 300 mm,

AT =

2,000 m when h > 1 300 mm.

3.

Room required for to the door:

3.1. Door located between bogie pivots:Os ¼ B þ

an − n2
2R

þ

p2
8R

þ

l − d
2

þ q þ wiR

3.2 Door located beyond bogie pivots:Ou ¼ B þ

an þ n2
2R

−

p2
8R

þ

(cid:18)

l − d
2

(cid:19)

þ q

2n þ a
a

þ wiR

n
a

þ waR

n þ a
a

4.

Notations (values in metres):

AT =

nominal distance between the track centreline and the fixed equipment (on a straight track);

h =

height above the running surface at the considered location, the vehicle being in its lowest position;

Os,
Ou =

distance allowed between the track centreline and the door edge, when the door is in its most protruding
position;

B =

a =

n =

p =

q =

distance between the vehicle centreline and the door edge, when the door is in its most protruding position;

distance between bogie pivots or between end axles;

distance of the door cross section most remote from the bogie pivot;

bogie wheel base;

possible transverse displacement due to the play between the axle and the axle box added with the play
between the axle box and the bogie frame measured from the middle position with ultimately worn
components;

wiR =

possible transverse displacement of the bogie pivot and the cradle, measured from the middle position
towards the internal side of the curve;

waR =

as wiR , but towards the outside of the curve;

wiR/aR = 0,020 m, maximum value for speeds less than 30 km/h (UIC 560);

l =

d =

R =

t =

maximum track gauge in straight and in considered curved track = 1,544 m;

distance between ultimately worn wheel flanges, measured 10mm outwards the running circle =1,492 m

Curve radius :

for h < 600 mm, R = 500 m,

for h ≥ 600 mm, R = 150 m.

allowed tolerance (0,020 m) for the displacement of the rail towards the fixed equipment between two
maintenance actions.

5.

Rules related to the transverse distance between the door and the fixed equipment:

Distance OV = L - Os/u should be at least 0,020 m.

L 344/384

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

6.

Gauge check

Door gauge check should be carried out on a straight track and on a 500/150-m curve, if value w varies linearly
according to 1/R. Otherwise, the check should be carried out on a straight track and on curve where Os/u is maximum.

7.

Display of the outputs

Formulae used, inserted and resulting values should be displayed in an easily understood manner.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/385

FIN1/Appendix E

Pantograph and non-insulated live parts

Figure W.3

Any non-insulated live part cannot be placed in the dashed area (25 kV).

1)

Es or Eu must be added in the transversal direction according to Appendix C.

L 344/386

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

ANNEX X

SPECIFIC CASES

MEMBER STATE: SPAIN AND PORTUGAL

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/387

L 344/388

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/389

L 344/390

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/391

L 344/392

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/393

L 344/394

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/395

L 344/396

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/397

L 344/398

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/399

L 344/400

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/401

L 344/402

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/403

L 344/404

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/405

ANNEX Y

CONSTITUENTS

Bogies and Running Gear

Bogies with existing approval under former UIC/RIV-regulation are considered as IC, provided the range of applicable
parameters in the new application (including those of the vehicle body) remain within the range already proved by an
existing application.

Existing approved bogies under former national regulation are considered as IC, if the national regulation used former UIC-
regulation, provided the range of applicable parameters in the new application (including those of the vehicle body) remain
within the range already proved by an existing application.

The tables below contain a list of bogies, that can be considered under the above criteria.

Special remark

Freight wagons are suitable for running speed Vmax = 120 km/h with their maximum design load (even if the brake
performance at maximal load is not sufficient) when they fulfil the following technical parameters:

— Two-axle wagons:

Tare:

Wheelbase:

Design requirements of the suspen-
sions:

— Bogie wagons

≥ 10 t

2a* ≥ 6,0 m
2a* ≥ 8,0 m by wagons fitted with double link suspension

according to the types of suspensions in the following table Y4

Tare

≥ 16 t

Design requirements of the bogies:

according to the types of bogies in the following tables Y1 and Y3

Y.1

TWO AXLE BOGIES

Table Y.1: Two-axle bogies for wagons operating up to 100km/h

K17, Y25TTV, Y21 Pse, DRRS25

Type of Bogie

K16, Y25 Lstm, Y25 Lst, Y25 Lsodm, Y25 Lsif, Y25 Lsi, Y25 Ls(s)i1, Y25 Ls(s)i2,
Y25 Ls(s)i1f, Y25 Ls(s)i2f, Y25 Lsdm, Y25 Lsd2i, Y25 Lsd2, Y25 Lsd1, Y25 Ls(s)m,
Y25 Ls(s), Y21 Lsedm, Y21Lse, K16, FS 46 Lssi, FS 46 Lsi, Y25 L(s)1,DRRS
DB 628, DB 629, DB 641, DB 642, DB 643, DB 645, DB 646, DB 651, DB 652, DB
653, DB 655, DB 656, DB 665, DB 680, DB 681, DB 682, DB 683, DB 685, DB 868,
DB 672 (DRRS), DB 882, DB 885
DB 094, DB 095, DB 097, DB 556, DB 565, DB 573, DB 574, DB 575, DB 578, DB
579, DB 583, DB 584, DB 585, DB 586, DB 587, DB 588, DB 589, DB 592

Y27 E2, Y27 E1m, Y27 E1, Y27 E, Y27 Cm1, Y27 C1, Y25 Rstm, Y25 Rst, Y25 Rsm,
Y25 Rsimf, Y25 Rsim, Y25 Rsif, Y25 Rsif, Y25 Rsi, Y25 Rs2m, Y25 Rs2, Y25 Rsa, Y25
Rs, Y25 Lsod1, Y25 Cstm, Y25 Cst, Y25 Csm, Y25 Csimf, Y25 Csim, Y25 Csif, Y25
Csi, Y25 Cs2m, Y25 Cs2, Y25 Cs1m, Y25 Cs1, Y25 Cst1, Y25 Cs, Y25 Cm1, Y25 Cm,
Y25 C1, Y25 C, Y21 Csei, Y21 Cse, G56, G66, G66M, G66P, G691, G692, G693,
G694, G70, G70M, G70P, G70T, G75, G771, Y25Cssi, Y21 Rse
DB 621, DB 622, DB 625, DB 640, DB 650, DB 684, DB 839, DB 851, DB 852, DB
853, DB 859, DB 864, DB 866, DB 867, DB 871, DB 872, DB 881, DB 887, DB 931,
DB 932
DB 096, DB 550, DB 551, DB 552, DB 553, DB 554, DB 555, DB 560, DB 561, DB
562, DB 563, DB 566, DB 567, DB 572, DB 576, DB 577, DB 581, DB 590, DB 591

Max. Wheelset Load [kN]

245 (25 t)

220 (22,5 t)

196 (20 t)

L 344/406

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Type of Bogie

Max. Wheelset Load [kN]

Y33 Am, Y33 A, Y27 D, Y27 Cm, Y27 C, Y25 D, Y23 Cm, Y23 C, Y21 C,
DB 582,

Y31 C1, FS 38i
DB 631, DB 707

Y 29

DB 741

DB 690

176 (18 t)

157 (16 t)

147 (15 t)

93 (9,5 t)

74 (7,5 t)

Table Y.2: Two-axle bogies for wagons operating up to 120 km/h

Type of Bogie

Max. Wheelset Load [kN]

K17, Y 25 LD, Y 27 LDm, DRRS, 4RS/N, WU83, Y25Lss, Y21Ls(s)e
DB 624, DB 626, DB 627, DB 644, DB 654, DB 666
DB 557

K16, Y21 Csse, Y21 Cs(s)e, Y25 Css, Y25 Cssm, Y25 Cssp, Y25 GVrss, Y25 Ls(s), Y25
Ls(s)i1, Y25 Ls(s)i2, Y25 Ls(s)i1f, Y25 Ls(s)i2f, Y25 Ls(s)m, Y25 Rss, Y25 Rssa,
Y25 Rssm, Y 25 RSSd1, 1XTamp, 6TNa, 6TNa/1, G884
DB 672 (DRRS)
DB 564

Y37 B, FS 46 Lssi

Y33 A, Y33Am

Y25 D, Y27 D, Y31 A, Y31B, Y31C

Y31 C1, FS 38i

220 (22,5 t)

196 (20 t)

176 (18 t)

167 (17 t)

157 (16 t)

127 (13 t)

NOTE: For bogies of the family Y25 (Y21, Y27, Y31, Y35, and Y37) there are only versions with elastic side bearers.

Table Y.2.1: Two-axle bogies for wagons operating up to 140 km/h

Type of Bogie

Max. Wheelset Load [kN]

DB 627.1

Y 25 LD, Y 27 LDm

Y27 D1, Y31B1, Y31B2

Y33 A, Y33 Am, Y 35 B

196 (20 t)

176 (18 t)

157 (16 t)

137 (14 t)

NOTE: For bogies of the family Y25 (Y21, Y27, Y31, Y35, and Y37) there are only versions with elastic side bearers.

Table Y.2.2: Two-axle bogies for wagons operating up to 160 km/h

Type of Bogie

Max. Wheelset Load [kN]

Y 37 A
DB 675 (DRRS)

Y25GVr, Y37B

Y30

176 (18 t)

157 (16 t)

98 (10 t)

NOTE: For bogies of the family Y25 (Y21, Y27, Y31, Y35, and Y37) there are only versions with elastic side bearers.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/407

Table Y.3: Three-axle bogies for wagons operating up to 100 km/h

Type of Bogie

Max. Wheelset Load [kN]

DB 715, DB 716, DB 816, DB 817

DB 713, DB 714

DB 710, DB 711

Y.2

SUSPENSION

245 (25 t)

220 (22,5 t)

196 (20 t)

Table Y.4: Suspensions for two axle wagons

Type of Suspension

Max speed [km/h]

Max. Wheelset Load [kN]

Niesky 2

UIC double link suspension (*)

Niesky 2

S 2000 (**)

100

120

120

120

(*) This suspension can be used on wagons with a wheelbase of ≥ 8 m only.
(**) Subject to approval by UIC before the coming into force of this TSI.

245 (25 t)

220 (22,5 t)

220 (22,5 t)

220 (22,5 t)

L 344/408

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

ANNEX Z

STRUCTURE AND MECHANICAL PARTS

Impact (Buffing) Test

Z.1.

BUFFING TESTS

Z.1.1. Requirement

An unbraked wagon standing on level straight track shall be capable, both when empty and laden, of withstanding the
buffing shock resulting from impact by a wagon with a total laden weight on rail of 80 t and fitted with side buffers with a
buffer energy storage capacity ≥ 30 kJ (1). A difference in the height of buffers (empty and laden condition) of max. 50mm
can be tolerated.

Z.1.2. Buffing tests with empty wagons

The tests shall be carried out with an increasing speed up to 12 km/h (2). Between the speeds from 8 to 12 km/h an
acceleration curve

Þ shall be recorded. The number of impacts can be limited.

¼ f ðvÞ

::
x

ð

Z.1.3. Buffing test with laden wagons

For this test, the wagon shall be loaded to its maximum capacity. The direction of impact shall be reversed after each buffing
impact except in the case of tank wagons. Buffing impact tests need not be undertaken for conventional flat wagons.

Z.1.4. Wagons with side buffers

Preliminary tests are to be carried out with an increasing speed of impact. These preliminary tests shall be continued until
one of two parameters (speed or force) attains the limiting values fixed in the following table .

40 identical buffing impacts shall then be carried out with this limit in force.

The preliminary tests and the series of buffing tests shall be conducted under the following conditions:

Limiting values

Force per buffer

1 500 kN (3) (4).
at a buffing speed
≤ 12 km/h

Buffing speed

12 km/h (5).

Table Z1

Preliminary tests

Test series

10 buffing impacts at pro-
gressively increasing speeds
up to 12 km/h, three of
which with a speed of
approximately. 9 km/h.
However, if an impact force
per buffer of 1 500 kN is
attained at a speed <
12 km/h, the speed shall
not be increased above this
value.

40 buffing impacts at the
limit speed defined during
the preliminary tests, viz:
— either 12 km/h,
— or the speed corre-

sponding to a buffing
force of 1 500 kN (5) (6)
(5) (6) (7).

Notes:

(1)

(2)

(3)

Recommendations concerning the type of buffer to be selected for different types of wagon are given in ERRI technical
document DT 85 sheet B 3.0
Unless otherwise stated in the standard conditions and contract. In particular, with certain wagons, which are
unacceptable for shunting on the gravity hump or for fly-shunting (i.e. type F-II), the buffing speed can be limited to 7
km/h.
The permissible tolerance on the buffer force at one end of the wagon is ± 200 kN, but the total force on both buffers
shall not exceed 3 000 kN.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/409

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

If the wagon tested is equipped with buffers of category C, the limiting value of the buffer force can, subject to the
agreement of the operator concerned, be reduced to 1 300 kN (with a buffing speed < 12 km/h) This does not apply
to tank wagons intended for the transport of dangerous goods category 2 of the RID regulations. These are to be
tested fitted with category A buffers.
If the value of the buffer force already reaches 1 000 kN for a buffing speed < 9 km/h, the wagon to be tested shall be
equipped with higher capacity buffers.
If requested by the operator, buffing tests with a force above 1 500 kN and a speed of up to 12 km/h can carried out at
the end of the tests.
For wagons with hydrodynamic long-stroke shock absorbers the limiting value of the buffer force is reduced to 1 000
kN.

Z.1.5. Wagons equipped with an automatic coupler

The buffing speed of 12 km/h shall in all cases be obtained.

Z.1.6. Results

The different buffing tests shall not result in any visible permanent deformations. The stresses occurring at certain critical
points of the bogie/underframe, underframe/body and superstructure connections shall be recorded.

The results obtained shall satisfy the following conditions :

— The cumulative residual strains arising from the preliminary test and from the series of 40 buffing impacts shall be less
than 2 ‰ and shall be stabilised before the 30th impact of the series. This does not apply however to those structural
components covered by special provisions.

— The variations in leading dimensions shall not impair the quality of use of the wagon.

L 344/410

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

ANNEX AA

ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES

Verification of Subsystems

Structure of modules for the EC verification procedure of Subsystems

Modules for the EC verification of subsystems

— Module SB: Type examination

— Module SD: Product quality management system

— Module SF: Product verification

— Module SH2: Full quality management system with design examination

MODULES FOR THE EC VERIFICATION OF SUBSYSTEMS

Module SB: Type Examination

1.

This module describes the EC verification procedure whereby a notified body checks and certifies at the request of an
contracting entity or its authorised representative established within the Community, that a type of a Rolling Stock
Freight wagon subsystem, representative of the production envisaged,

— complies with this TSI and any other applicable TSI, which demonstrate that the essential requirements (1) of

Directive 2001/16/EC (2) have been met

— complies with the other regulations deriving from the Treaty.

The type examination defined by this module could include specific assessment phases — design review, type test or
review of manufacturing process, which are specified in the relevant TSI.

2.

The contracting entity (3) must lodge an application for EC verification (through type examination) of the subsystem
with a notified body of his choice. The application must include :

— name and address of the contracting entity or its authorised representative

— the technical documentation, as described in point 3.

3.

The applicant must place at the disposal of the notified body a specimen of the subsystem (4), representative of the
production envisaged and hereinafter called ‘type’.

A type may cover several versions of the subsystem provided that the differences between the versions do not affect
the provisions of the TSI.

The notified body may request further specimens if needed for carrying out the test programme.

If so required for specific test or examination methods and specified in the TSI or in the European specification (5)
referenced to in the TSI, a specimen or specimens of a subassembly or assembly or a specimen of the subsystem in a
pre-assembled condition shall to be provided.

The technical documentation and specimen(s) must enable the design, manufacture, installation, maintenance and
operation of the subsystem to be understood, and shall enable conformity with the provisions of the TSI to be
assessed.

(1) The essential requirements are reflected in the technical parameters, interfaces and performance requirements, which are set out in

Chapter 4 of the TSI.

(2) This module could be used in the future when the TSIs of the HS directive 96/48/EC are updated.
(3)

In the module, ‘the contracting entity’ means ‘the subsystem contracting entity, as defined in the directive. or his authorised representative
established within the Community’.

(4) The relevant section of a TSI may define specific requirements in this regard.
(5) The definition of an European specification is indicated in the directives 96/48/EC and 01/16/EC. The guide for application of HS TSIs

explains the way to use the European Specifications

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/411

The technical documentation must include:

— a general description of the subsystem, overall design and structure,

— the Rolling Stock register, including all information as specified in the TSI

— conceptual design and manufacturing information,

for example drawings,

schemes of components,

subassemblies, assemblies, circuits, etc.,

— descriptions and explanations necessary for the understanding of the design and manufacturing information,

the maintenance and the operation of the subsystem,

— the technical specifications, including European specifications, that have been applied,

— any necessary supporting evidence for the use of the above specifications,

in particular where European

specifications and the relevant clauses have not been applied in full,

— a list of the interoperability constituents to be incorporated into the subsystem,

— copies of the EC declarations of conformity or suitability for use of interoperability constituents and all the

necessary elements defined in annex VI of the directives,

— evidence of conformity with regulations deriving from the treaty (including certificates)

— technical documentation regarding the manufacture and the assembly of the subsystem,

— a list of manufacturers, involved in the subsystem's design, manufacturing, assembly and installation,

— conditions for use of the subsystem (restrictions of running time or distance, wear limits etc),

— conditions for maintenance and technical documentation regarding the maintenance of the subsystem

— any technical requirement that must be taken into account during production, maintenance or operation of the

subsystem

— results of design calculations made, examinations carried out, etc.,

— test reports.

If the TSI requires further information for the technical documentation, this shall be included.

4.

The notified body must:

4.1. Examine the technical documentation,

4.2 Verify that the specimen(s) of the subsystem or of assemblies or subassemblies of the subsystem, has (have) been
manufactured in conformity with the technical documentation, and carry out or have carried out the type tests in
accordance with the provisions of the TSI and the appropriate European specifications. Such manufacture shall be
verified using an appropriate assessment module.

4.3. Where a design review is requested in the TSI, perform an examination of the design methods, the design tools and
the design results to evaluate their capability to fulfil the requirements for conformity for the subsystem at the
completion of the design process

4.4.

Identify the elements which have been designed in accordance with the relevant provisions of the TSI and the
European specifications as well as the elements which have been designed without applying the relevant provisions of
those European specifications;

4.

5 .Perform or have performed the appropriate examinations and necessary tests in accordance with points 4.2. and
4.3 to establish where the relevant European specifications have been chosen, these have actually been applied;

4.6. Perform or have performed the appropriate examinations and necessary tests in accordance with point 4.2. and 4.3. to
the TSI when the appropriate European

the requirements of

establish whether the solutions adopted meet
specifications have not been applied.

4.7. Agree with the applicant the location where the examinations and necessary tests will be carried out.

L 344/412

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

5. Where the type meets the provisions of the TSI, the notified body shall issue a type-examination certificate to the
applicant. The certificate shall contain the name and address of the contracting entity and the manufacturer(s)
indicated in the technical documentation, conclusions of the examination, conditions for its validity and the necessary
data for identification of the approved type. A list of the relevant parts of the technical documentation must be
annexed to the certificate and a copy kept by the notified body.

If the contracting entity is denied a type-examination certificate, the notified body must provide detailed reasons for
such denial.

Provision must be made for an appeals procedure.

6.

7.

8.

9.

Each notified body must communicate to the other notified bodies the relevant information concerning the type-
examination certificates issued, withdrawn or refused

The other notified bodies may receive on request copies of the type-examination certificates issued and/or their
additions. The annexes to the certificates must be kept at the disposal of the other notified bodies.

The contracting entity must keep with the technical documentation copies of type-examination certificates and any
additions throughout the service life of the subsystem. It must be sent to any other member state which so requests.

The applicant must inform the notified body that holds the technical documentation concerning the type-examination
certificate of all modifications which may affect the conformity with the requirements of the TSI or the prescribed
conditions for use of the subsystem. The subsystem must receive additional approval in such cases. This additional
approval may be given either in the form of an addition to the original type-examination certificate, or by issue of a
new certificate after withdrawal of the old certificate.

MODULES FOR THE EC VERIFICATION OF SUBSYSTEMS

Module SD: Production Quality Management System

1.

This module describes the EC verification procedure whereby a notified body checks and certifies, at the request of an
contracting entity or its authorised representative established within the Community, that a Rolling Stock Freight
wagon subsystem, for which already a type-examination certificate has been issued by a notified body,

— complies with this TSI and any other applicable TSI, , which demonstrate that the essential requirements (1) of

Directive 01/16/EC (2) have been met

— complies with the other regulations deriving from the Treaty,

and may be placed in service.

2.

The notified body carries out the procedure, under the condition, that :

— the type examination certificate issued prior to the assessment remains valid for the subsystem subject to the

application,

— the contracting entity (3) and the main contractors involved are satisfying the obligations of point 3.

The ‘main contractors’ refers to companies, whose activities contribute to fulfil the essential requirements of the TSI. It
concerns:

— the company responsible for the whole subsystem project (including in particular responsibility for subsystem

integration),

— other companies only involved in a part of the subsystem project, (performing for example assembly or

installation of the subsystem).

It does not refer to manufacturer sub contractors supplying components and interoperability constituents.

(1) The essential requirements are reflected in the technical parameters, interfaces and performance requirements, which are set out in

Chapter 4 of the TSI.

(2) This module could be used in the future when the TSIs of the HS directive 96/48/EC are updated.
(3)

In the module, ‘the contracting entity’ means ‘the subsystem contracting entity, as defined in the directive. or his authorised representative
established within the Community’.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/413

3.

For the subsystem that is subject of the EC verification procedure, the contracting entity, or the main contractors when
employed, shall operate an approved quality management system for manufacture and final product inspection and
testing as specified in point 5 and which shall be subject to surveillance as specified in point 6.

When the contracting entity itself is responsible for the whole subsystem project (including in particular responsibility
for subsystem integration), or the contracting entity is directly involved in the production (including assembly and
installation), it has to operate an approved quality management system for those activities, which shall be subject to
surveillance as specified in point 6.

If a main contractor is responsible for the whole subsystem project (including in particular responsibility for
subsystem integration), it must operate in any case an approved quality management system for manufacture and final
product inspection and testing, which shall be subject to surveillance as specified in point 6.

4.

EC verification procedure

4.1. The contracting entity must lodge an application for EC verification of the subsystem (through production quality
management system), including co-ordination of the surveillance of the quality management systems, as under point
5.3 and 6.5. with a notified body of its choice. The contracting entity must inform the manufacturers involved of this
choice and of the application.

4.2. The application must enable the design, manufacture, assembly, installation, maintenance and operation of the
subsystem to be understood, and shall enable conformity with the type as described in the type-examination
certificate and the requirements of the TSI to be assessed.

The application must include:

— name and address of the contracting entity or its authorised representative

— the technical documentation regarding the approved type, including the type examination certificate, as issued

after completion of the procedure defined in module SB,

and, if not included in this documentation,

— a general description of the subsystem, its overall design and structure,

— the technical specifications, including European specifications, that have been applied,

— any necessary supporting evidence for the use of the above specifications, in particular where these
European specifications, and the relevant clauses have not been applied in full. This supporting evidence
must include the results of tests carried out by the appropriate laboratory of the manufacturer or on his
behalf.

— The Rolling Stock register, including all information as specified in the TSI,

— the technical documentation regarding the manufacture and the assembly of the subsystem,

— evidence of conformity to other regulations deriving from the treaty (including certificates) for the

production phase

— a list of the interoperability constituents to be incorporated into the subsystem,

— copies of the EC declarations of conformity or suitability for use with which the constituents must be

provided, and all the necessary elements defined in annex VI of the directives,

— a list of manufacturers, involved in the subsystem's design, manufacturing, assembly and installation,

— the demonstration, that all stages, as mentioned under point 5,2, are covered by quality management
systems of the contracting entity, if involved, and/or of the main contractors, and the evidence of their
effectiveness,

— indication of the notified body, responsible for the approval and surveillance of these quality management

systems.

4.3. The notified body shall fist examine the application concerning the validity of the type examination and the type

examination certificate.

L 344/414

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

If the notified body considers the type examination certificate no longer remains valid or is not appropriate and that a
new type examination is necessary, it shall justify its decision.

5.

Quality management system

5.1. The contracting entity,

if involved, and the main contractors, when employed, must lodge an application for

assessment of their quality management systems with a notified body of their choice.

The application must include:

— all relevant information for the subsystem envisaged,

— the quality management system documentation.

the technical documentation of the approved type and a copy of the type examination certificate, issued after
the completion of the type examination procedure of module SB.

For those only involved in a part of the subsystem project, the information to be provided is only that for the
relevant part.

5.2. For the contracting entity or the main contractor responsible for the whole subsystem project, the quality
management systems shall ensure overall compliance of the subsystem with the type as described in the type-
examination certificate and overall compliance of the subsystem with the requirements of the TSI. For other main
contractor, their quality management system(s) has (have) to ensure compliance of their relevant contribution to the
subsystem with the type as described in the type-examination certificate and with the requirements of the TSI.

All the elements, requirements and provisions adopted by the applicant(s) must be documented in a systematic and
orderly manner in the form of written policies, procedures and instructions. This quality management system
documentation shall ensure a common understanding of the quality policies and procedures such as quality
programmes, plans, manuals and records.

It must contain in particular an adequate description of the following items for all applicant(s):

— the quality objectives and the organisational structure,

— the corresponding manufacturing, quality control and quality management techniques, processes and systematic

actions that will be used,

— the examinations, checks and tests that will be carried out before, during and after manufacture, assembly and

installation, and the frequency with which they will be carried out,

— the quality records, such as inspection reports and test data, calibration data, qualification reports of the

personnel concerned, etc.,

and also for the contracting entity or the main contractor responsible for the whole subsystem project:

— responsibilities and powers of the management with regard to overall subsystem quality, including in particular

the subsystem integration management. The examinations,

tests and checking shall cover all of the following stages:

— structure of subsystem,

including,

in particular, civil-engineering activities, constituent assembly,

final

adjustment,

— final testing of the subsystem,

— and, where specified in the TSI, the validation under full operation conditions.

5.3. The notified body chosen by the contracting entity must examine, if all stages of the subsystem as mentioned under
point 5.2 are sufficiently and properly covered by the approval and surveillance of the quality management system(s)
of the applicant(s) (1).

(1)

For the rolling stock TSI, the notified body may participate to the final in service test of locomotives or train set in the conditions
specified in the relevant chapter of the TSI.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/415

If the conformity of the subsystem with the type as described in the type-examination certificate and the compliance
of the subsystem with the requirements of the TSI is based on more than one quality management system, the notified
body shall examine in particular,

— if the relations and interfaces between the quality management systems are clearly documented

— and if overall responsibilities and powers of the management for the compliance of the whole entire subsystem

for the main contractors are sufficiently and properly defined.

5.4. The notified body referenced to in point 5.1. must assess the quality management system to determine whether it
satisfies the requirements referenced in point 5.2. It presumes compliance with these requirements if the manufacturer
implements a quality system for production, final product inspection and testing in respect of the Standard EN/ISO
9001 — 2000, which takes into consideration the specificity of the interoperability constituent for which it is
implemented.

When an applicant operates a certified quality management system, the notified body shall take this into account in
the assessment.

The audit shall be specific for the subsystem concerned, taking into consideration the specific contribution of the
applicant to the subsystem. The auditing team must have at least one member experienced as an assessor in the
subsystem technology concerned. The evaluation procedure shall
include an assessment visit to the applicant's
premises.

The decision must be notified to the applicant. The notification must contain the conclusions of the examination and
the reasoned assessment decision.

5.5. The contracting entity, if involved, and the main contractors shall undertake to fulfil the obligations arising out of the

quality management system as approved and to uphold it so that it remains adequate and efficient.

They must keep the notified body that has approved the quality management system, informed of any significant
change that will affect the fulfilment of the TSI requirements by the subsystem.

The notified body must evaluate the modifications proposed and decide whether the amended quality management
system will still satisfy the requirements referenced in point 5.2 or whether a re-assessment is required.

lt must notify its decision to the applicant. The notification shall contain the conclusions of the examination and the
reasoned assessment decision.

6.

Surveillance of the quality management system(s) under the responsibility of the notified body

6.1. The purpose of surveillance is to make sure that the contracting entity, if involved, and the main contractors, duly

fulfil the obligations arising out of the approved quality management system.

6.2. The contracting entity, if involved, and the main contractors must send to the notified body referenced in point 5.1 (or
have sent) all the documents needed for that purpose including the implementation plans and technical records
concerning the subsystem (as far as relevant for the specific contribution of the applicants to the subsystem), in
particular:

— the quality management system documentation, including the particular means implemented to ensure that:

— for the contracting entity or main contractor, responsible for the whole subsystem project, overall
responsibilities and powers of the management for the compliance of the whole entire subsystem are
sufficiently and properly defined,

— for each applicant, the quality management system is correctly managed for achieving integration at

subsystem level,

— the quality records as foreseen by the manufacturing part (including assembly and installation) of the quality
management system, such as inspection reports and test data, calibration data, qualification reports of the
personnel concerned, etc.

6.3. The notified body must periodically carry out audits to make sure that the contracting entity, if involved, and the main
contractors, maintain and apply the quality management system and must provide an audit report to them. When
those operate a certified quality management system, the notified body shall take this into account in the surveillance.

L 344/416

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

The frequency of the audits shall be at least once a year, with at least one audit during the time period of performing
relevant activities (manufacture, assembly or installation) of the subsystem being the subject of the EC verification
procedure mentioned under point 8.

6.4. Additionally the notified body may pay unexpected visits to the relevant sites of the applicant(s). At the time of such
visits, the notified body may conduct complete or partial audits and may carry out or cause to be carried out tests, in
order to check the proper functioning of the quality management system where necessary. It must provide the
applicant(s) with an inspection report and also, audit and/or test reports, as appropriate.

6.5. The notified body chosen by the contracting entity and responsible for the EC verification, if not carrying out the
surveillance of all the quality management system(s) concerned, must co ordinate the surveillance activities of any
other notified body responsible for that task, in order:

— to be ensured that correct management of interfaces between the different quality management systems relating

to subsystem integration has been performed,

— to collect, in liaison with the contracting entity, the necessary elements for the assessment to guarantee the

consistency and the overall supervision of the different quality management systems.

This co ordination includes the rights of the notified body:

— to receive all documentation (approval and surveillance), issued by the other notified bodies,

— to witness the surveillance audits in point 6.3,

— to initiate additional audits as in point 6.4 under its responsibility and together with the other notified bodies.

The notified body as referenced in point 5.1. must have entrance for inspection purposes, audit and surveillance to the
locations of building sites, production workshops, locations of assembly and installations, storage areas and where
appropriate, prefabrication and testing facilities and, more general, to all premises which it considers necessary in
order to carry out its tasks, in accordance with the applicant's specific contribution to the subsystem project.

The contracting entity, if involved, and the main contractors must, for a period of 10 years after the last subsystem has
been manufactured, keep at the disposal of the national authorities:

7.

8.

— the documentation referenced in the second indent of the second subparagraph of point 5,1,

— the updating referenced in the second subparagraph of point 5.5,

— the decisions and reports from the notified body, which are, referenced in points 5.4, 5.5 and 6.4.

9. Where the subsystem meets the requirements of the TSI, the notified body must then, based on the type examination
and the approval and surveillance of the quality management system(s), draw up the certificate of conformity intended
for the contracting entity, who shall in turn draw up the EC declaration of verification intended for the supervisory
authority in the Member State within which the subsystem is located and/or operates.

The EC declaration of verification and the accompanying documents must be dated and signed. The declaration must
be written in the same language of the technical file and must contain at least the information included in Annex V of
the Directive.

10.

The notified body chosen by the contracting entity shall be responsible for compiling the technical file that has to
accompany the EC declaration of verification. The technical file shall include at least the information indicated in the
Art 18 (3) of the Directive, and in particular as follows:

— all necessary documents relating to the characteristics of the subsystem,

— a list of interoperability constituents incorporated into the subsystem,

— copies of the EC declarations of conformity and, where appropriate, of the EC declarations of suitability for use,
which said constituents must be provided in accordance with Article 13 of the Directive, accompanied, where
appropriate, by the corresponding documents (certificates, quality management system approvals and
surveillance documents) issued by the notified bodies,

— all elements relating to the maintenance, the conditions and limits for use of the subsystem,

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/417

— all elements relating to the instructions concerning servicing, constant or routine monitoring, adjustment and

maintenance,

— the type-examination certificate for the subsystem and the accompanying technical documentation as defined in

the module SB,

— evidence of conformity with other regulations deriving from the treaty (including certificates)

— certificate of conformity of the notified body as mentioned under point 9, accompanied by corresponding
calculation notes and countersigned by itself, stating that the project complies with the Directive and the TSI,
and mentioning, where appropriate, reservations recorded during performance of the activities and not
withdrawn. The certificate should also be accompanied by the inspection and audit reports drawn up in
connection with the verification, as mentioned in points 6.3 and 6.4 and in particular:

— the Rolling Stock register, including all information as specified in the TSI.

11.

Each notified body must communicate to the other notified bodies the relevant information concerning the quality
management system approvals issued, withdrawn or refused.

The other notified bodies may receive on request copies of the quality management system approvals issued.

12.

The records accompanying the certificate of conformity must be lodged with the contracting entity.

The contracting entity within the Community must keep a copy of the technical file throughout the service life of the
subsystem; it must be sent to any other Member State which so requests.

MODULES FOR THE EC VERIFICATION OF SUBSYSTEMS

Module SF: Product Verification

1.

This module describes the EC verification procedure whereby a notified body checks and certifies at the request of an
contracting entity or its authorised representative established within the Community, that a Rolling Stock Freight
wagon subsystem, for which a type-examination certificate has already been issued by a notified body,

— complies with this TSI and any other applicable TSI, which demonstrate that the essential requirements (1) of

Directive 01/16/EC (2) have been met

— complies with the other regulations deriving from the Treaty

and may be placed into service

2.

The contracting entity (3) must lodge an application for EC verification (through product verification) of the subsystem
with a notified body of his choice. The application shall include :

— The name and address of the contracting entity or its authorised representative

— the technical documentation.

3. Within that part of the procedure the contracting entity checks and attests that the subsystem concerned is in
conformity with the type as described in the type examination certificate and satisfies the requirements of the TSI that
apply to it.

The notified body shall carrying out the procedure under the condition that the type examination certificate issued
prior to the assessment remains valid for the subsystem subject to the application.

(1) The essential requirements are reflected in the technical parameters, interfaces and performance requirements, which are set out in

Chapter 4 of the TSI.

(2) This module could be used in the future when the TSIs of the HS directive 96/48/EC are updated.
(3)

In the module, ‘the contracting entity’ means ‘the subsystem contracting entity, as defined in the directive. or his authorised representative
established within the Community’.

L 344/418

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

4.

5.

The contracting entity must take all measures necessary in order that the manufacturing process (including assembly
and integration of interoperability constituents by main contractors (1) when employed) ensures conformity of the
subsystem with the type as described in the type-examination certificate and with the requirements of the TSI that
apply to it.

The application must enable the design, manufacture, installation, maintenance and operation of the subsystem to be
understood, and shall enable conformity with the type as described in the type-examination certificate and the
requirements of the TSI to be assessed.

The application must include:

— the technical documentation regarding the approved type, including the type examination certificate, as issued

after completion of the procedure defined in module SB,

and, if not included in this documentation,

— a general description of the subsystem, overall design and structure,

— the Rolling Stock register, including all information as specified in the TSI,

— conceptual design and manufacturing information,

for example drawings,

schemes of components,

subassemblies, assemblies, circuits, etc.,

— the technical documentation regarding the manufacture and the assembly of the subsystem,

— the technical specifications, including European specification, that have been applied,

— any necessary supporting evidence for the use of the above specifications, in particular where these European

specification and the relevant clauses have not been applied in full,

— evidence of conformity to other regulations deriving from the treaty (including certificates) for the production

phase

— a list of the Interoperability Constituents, to be incorporated into the subsystem,

— copies of the EC declarations of conformity or suitability for use with which said constituents must be provided

and all the necessary elements defined in annex VI of the directives,

— a list of manufacturers involved in the subsystem's design, manufacture, assembly and installation,

If the TSI requires further information for the technical documentation, this shall be included.

6.

The notified body shall first examine the application concerning the validity of the type examination and the type
examination certificate.

If the notified body considers the type examination certificate no longer remains valid or is not appropriate and that a
new type examination is necessary, it shall justify its decision.

The notified body must carry out the appropriate examinations and tests in order to check the conformity of the
subsystem with the type, as described in the type examination certificate and with the requirements of the TSI. The
notified body shall examine and testing of every subsystem manufactured as a serial product, as specified in point 4

7.

Verification by examination and testing of every subsystem (as a serial product)

7.1. The notified body must carry out the tests, examinations and verifications, to ensure conformity of the subsystems, as
serial products as provided for in the TSI. The examinations, tests and checking shall extend to the stages as provided
for in the TSI.

7.2. Each subsystem (as serial product) must be individually examined, tested and verified (2) in order to verify its
conformity with the type as described in the type-examination certificate and the requirements of the TSI that apply to
it. When a test is not set out in the TSI, (or in an European Standard quoted in the TSI), the relevant European
Specifications or equivalent tests are applicable.

(1) The ‘main contractors’ refers to companies, whose activities contribute to fulfil essential requirements of the TSI. It concerns the
company that can be responsible for the whole subsystem project or other companies only involved in a part of the subsystem project,
(performing for example assembly or installation of the subsystem).
In particular, for the rolling stock TSI, the notified body will participate in the final in service testing of rolling stock or train set. This will
be indicated in the relevant chapter of the TSI

(2)

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/419

8.

The notified body may agree with the contracting entity (and the main contractors) the locations where the tests will
be carried out and may agree that final testing of the subsystem and, whenever required in the TSI, tests or validation
under full operating conditions, are carried out by the contracting entity under direct supervision and attendance of
the notified body.

The notified body shall have entrance for testing and verification purposes to production workshops, locations of
assembly and installations, and where appropriate, prefabrication and testing facilities in order to carry out its tasks as
provided for in the TSI.

9. Where the subsystem meets the requirements of the TSI, the notified body must, draw up the certificate of conformity
intended for the contracting entity, which in turn draws up the EC declaration of verification intended for the
supervisory authority in the Member State where the subsystem is located and/or operates.

These NB activities shall be based on the type examination and the tests, verifications and checks carried out on all
serial products as indicated in point 7 and required in the TSI and/or in the relevant European specification.

The EC declaration of verification and the accompanying documents must be dated and signed.

The declaration must be written in the same language of the technical file and must contain at least the information
included in Annex V of the Directive.

10.

The notified body shall be responsible for compiling the technical file that has to accompany the EC declaration of
verification. The technical file shall include at least the information indicated in Art.18 (3) of the Directives, and in
particular as follows :

— all necessary documents relating to the characteristics of the subsystem

— the Rolling Stock register, including all information as specified in the TSI,

— the list of interoperability constituents incorporated into the subsystem,

— copies of the EC declarations of conformity and, where appropriate, of the EC declarations of suitability for use,
which the constituents must be provided in accordance with Article 13 of the Directive, accompanied, where
appropriate, by the corresponding documents (certificates, quality management system approvals and
surveillance documents) issued by the notified bodies,

— all elements relating to the maintenance, the conditions and limits for use of the subsystem,

— all elements relating to the instructions concerning servicing, constant or routine monitoring, adjustment and

maintenance,

— the type-examination certificate for the subsystem and accompanying technical documentation, as defined in

the module SB

— certificate of conformity of the notified body as mentioned in point 9, accompanied by corresponding
calculation notes and countersigned by itself, stating that the project complies with the directive and the TSI,
and mentioning, where appropriate, reservations recorded during performance of activities and not withdrawn.
The certificate should also be accompanied, if relevant, by the inspection and audit reports drawn up in
connection with the verification.

11.

The records accompanying the certificate of conformity must be lodged with the contracting entity.

The contracting entity must keep a copy of the technical file throughout the service life of the subsystem; it must be
sent to any other Member State which so requests.

L 344/420

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

MODULES FOR THE EC VERIFICATION OF SUBSYSTEMS

Module SH2: Full Quality Management System with Design Examination

1.

This module describes the EC verification procedure whereby a notified body checks and certifies, at the request of an
contracting entity or its authorised representative established within the Community, that a Rolling Stock Freight
wagon subsystem

— complies with this TSI and any other applicable TSI, , which demonstrate that the essential requirements (1) of

Directive 01/16/EC (2) have been met

— complies with the other regulations deriving from the Treaty.

and may be placed in service

2.

The notified body shall carry out the procedure,
including a design examination of the subsystem, under the
condition, that the contracting entity (3) and the main contractors involved are satisfying the obligations of point. 3

The ‘main contractors’ refers to companies, whose activities contribute to fulfil the essential requirements of the TSI. It
concerns the company:

— responsible for the whole subsystem project (including in particular responsibility for subsystem integration),

— other companies only involved only in a part of the subsystem project (performing for example design,

assembly or installation of the subsystem).

It does not refer to manufacturer sub contractors supplying components and interoperability constituents.

3.

For the subsystem that is subject of the EC verification procedure, the contracting entity or the main contractors,
when employed, shall operate an approved quality management system for design, manufacture and final product
inspection and testing as specified in point 5 and which shall be subject to surveillance as specified in point 6

The main contractor responsible for the whole subsystem project (including in particular responsibility for subsystem
integration), must operate in any case an approved quality management system for design, manufacture and final
product inspection and testing, which shall be subject to surveillance as specified in point 6.

In the case that the contracting entity itself is responsible for the whole subsystem project (including in particular
responsibility for subsystem integration) or that the contracting entity is directly involved in the design and/or
production (including assembly and installation), it shall operate an approved quality management system for those
activities, which shall be subject to surveillance as specified in point 6.

Applicants which are only involved in assembly and installation, may operate only an approved quality management
system for manufacture and final product inspection and testing

4.

EC verification procedure

4.1. The contracting entity must lodge an application for EC verification of

the subsystem (through full quality
management system with design examination), including co ordination of surveillance of the quality management
systems as in points 5.4. and 6.6., with a notified body of its choice. The contracting entity must inform the
manufacturers involved of his choice and of the application.

4.2. The application must enable the design, manufacture, assembly, installation, maintenance and operation of the

subsystem to be understood, and shall enable conformity with the requirements of the TSI to be assessed.

The application must include:

— name and address of the contracting entity or its authorised representative,

— the technical documentation including:

— a general description of the subsystem, overall design and structure,

(1) The essential requirements are reflected in the technical parameters, interfaces and performance requirements, which are set out in

Chapter 4 of the TSI.

(2) This module could be used in the future when the TSIs of the HS directive 96/48/EC are updated.
(3)

In the module, ‘the contracting entity’ means ‘the subsystem contracting entity, as defined in the directive. or his authorised representative
established within the Community’.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/421

— the technical design specifications, including European specifications, that have been applied,

— any necessary supporting evidence for the use of the above specifications,
European specifications and the relevant clauses have not been applied in full.

in particular where the

— the test programme

— theRolling Stock register, including all information as specified in the TSI,

— the technical documentation regarding the manufacture, the assembly of the subsystem,

— a list of the interoperability constituents to be incorporated into the subsystem,

— copies of the EC declarations of conformity or suitability for use with which the constituents must be

provided and all the necessary elements defined in annex VI of the directives,

— evidence of conformity to other regulations deriving from the treaty (including certificates)

— a list of all manufacturers, involved in the subsystem's design, manufacturing, assembly and installation,

— conditions for use of the subsystem (restrictions of running time or distance, wear limits etc),

— conditions for maintenance and technical documentation regarding the maintenance of the subsystem

— any technical requirement that must be taken into account during production, maintenance or operation of the

subsystem

— the explanation, of how all stages, as mentioned in point 5.2, are covered by quality management systems of the
mains contractor(s) and/or of the contracting entity, if involved, and the evidence of their effectiveness,

— indication of the notified body (ies) responsible for the approval and surveillance of these quality management

systems.

4.3.

The contracting entity shall present the results of examinations, checking and tests (1), including type tests when
required, carried out by its appropriate laboratory or on their behalf.

4.4. The notified body must examine the application concerning the design examination and assess the results of the tests.
Where the design meets the provisions of the Directive and of the TSI that apply to it must issue a design examination
report to the applicant. The report shall contain the conclusions of the design examination, conditions for its validity,
if relevant, a description of the subsystem's
the necessary data for identification of the design examined and,
functioning.

If the contracting entity is denied a design examination report, the notified body must provide detailed reasons for
such denial. Provision must be made for an appeals procedure.

5.

Quality management system

5.1. The contracting entity,

if involved, and the main contractors, when employed, must lodge an application for

assessment of their quality management systems with a notified body of their choice.

The application must include:

— all relevant information for the subsystem envisaged,

— the quality management system documentation.

For those only involved in a part of the subsystem project, the information to be provided is only that for the relevant
part.

5.2. For the contracting entity or the main contractor responsible for the whole subsystem project, the quality

management system shall ensure overall compliance of the subsystem with the requirements of the TSI.

(1) The presentation of the results of the tests can be at the same time as the application or later.

L 344/422

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

The quality management system(s), for other main contractor(s), has (have) to ensure compliance of their relevant
contribution to the subsystem, with the requirements of the TSI. All the elements, requirements and provisions
adopted by the applicants must be documented in a systematic and orderly manner in the form of written policies,
procedures and instructions. This quality management system documentation shall ensure a common understanding
of the quality policies and procedures such as quality programmes, plans, manuals and records.

The system must contain in particular an adequate description of the following items :

— for all applicants:

— the quality objectives and the organisational structure,

— the corresponding manufacturing, quality control and quality management techniques, processes and

systematic actions that will be used,

— the examinations, checking and tests that will be carried out before, during and after design, manufacture,

assembly and installation and the frequency with which they will be carried out,

— the quality records, such as inspection reports and test data, calibration data, qualification reports of the

personnel concerned, etc.,

— for the main contractors, as far as relevant for their contribution to the design of the subsystem :

— the technical design specifications, including European specifications (1), that will be applied and, where
the European specifications will not be applied in full, the means that will be used to ensure that the
requirements of the TSI that apply to the subsystem will be met,

— the design control and design verification techniques, processes and systematic actions that will be used

when designing the subsystem,

— the means to monitor the achievement of the required design and subsystem quality and the effective

operation of the quality management systems in all phases including production.

— and also for the contracting entity or the main contractor responsible for the whole subsystem project:

— responsibilities and powers of the management with regard to overall subsystem quality, including in

particular the subsystem integration management.

The examinations, tests and checking shall cover all of the following stages:

— overall design,

— structure of the subsystem,

including,

in particular, civil-engineering activities, constituent assembly, final

adjustment,

— final testing of the subsystem,

— and, where specified in the TSI, the validation under full operation conditions.

5.3. The notified body chosen by the contracting entity must examine, if all stages of the subsystem as mentioned in point
5.2 are sufficiently and properly covered by the approval and surveillance of the quality management system(s) of the
applicant(s) (2).

(1) The definition of an European specification is indicated in the directives 96/48/EC and 01/16/EC and in the guidelines for application of

(2)

HS TSIs
For the rolling stock TSI, the notified body may participate to the final in service test of rolling stock or train set in the conditions
specified in the relevant chapter of the TSI.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/423

If the compliance of the subsystem with the requirements of the TSI is based on more than one quality management
system, the notified body shall examine in particular,

— if the relations and interfaces between the quality management systems are clearly documented

and if overall responsibilities and powers of the management for the compliance of the whole entire subsystem
for the main contractor are sufficiently and properly defined.

5.4. The notified body referenced in point 5.1. must assess the quality management system to determine whether it
satisfies the requirements of point 5.2.
It presumes compliance with these requirements if the manufacturer
implements a quality system for design, production, final product inspection and testing in respect of the Standard
EN/ISO 9001 — 2000, which takes into consideration the specificity of the interoperability constituent for which it is
implemented.

When an applicant operates a certified quality management system, the notified body shall take this into account in
the assessment.

The audit shall be specific for the subsystem concerned, taking into consideration the specific contribution of the
applicant to the subsystem. The auditing team must have at least one member experienced as an assessor in the
subsystem technology concerned. The evaluation procedure shall
include an assessment visit to the applicant's
premises.

The decision must be notified to the applicant. The notification must contain the conclusions of the examination and
the reasoned assessment decision.

5.5. The contracting entity, if involved, and the main contractors shall undertake to fulfil the obligations arising out of the

quality management system as approved and to uphold it so that it remains adequate and efficient.

They must keep the notified body that has approved their quality management system informed of any significant
change that will affect the fulfilment of the requirements by the subsystem.

The notified body must evaluate any modifications proposed and decide whether the amended quality management
system will still satisfy the requirements of point 5.2 or whether a re-assessment is required.

It shall notify its decision to the applicant. The notification shall contain the conclusions of the examination and the
reasoned assessment decision.

6.

Surveillance of the quality management system(s) under the responsibility of the notified body

6.1. The purpose of surveillance is to make sure that the contracting entity, if involved, and the main contractors duly fulfil

the obligations arising out of the approved quality management system(s).

6.2. The contracting entity, if involved, and the main contractors must send the notified body referenced in point 5.1. (or
have sent) all the documents needed for that purpose and in particular the implementation plans and technical records
concerning the subsystem (as far as relevant for the specific contribution of the applicant to the subsystem), including:

— the quality management system documentation, including the particular means implemented to ensure that

— for the contracting entity or the main contractor, responsible for the whole subsystem project, overall
responsibilities and powers of the management for the compliance of the whole entire subsystem are
sufficiently and properly defined,

— for each applicant, the quality management system is correctly managed for achieving integration at

subsystem level,

— the quality records as foreseen by the design part of the quality management system, such as results of analyses,

calculations, tests, etc.,

— the quality records as foreseen by the manufacturing part (including assembly, installation and integration) of
the quality management system, such as inspection reports and test data, calibration data, competency records
of the personnel concerned, etc.

L 344/424

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

6.3. The notified body must periodically carry out audits to make sure that the contracting entity, if involved, and the main
contractors maintain and apply the quality management system and shall provide an audit report to them. When they
operate a certified quality management system, the notified body shall take this into account in the surveillance.

The frequency of the audits shall be at least once a year, with at least one audit during the time period of performing
the relevant activities (design, manufacture, assembly or installation) for the subsystem being the subject of the EC
verification procedure mentioned in point 7.

6.4. Additionally the notified body may pay unexpected visits to the sites mentioned in point 5.2 of the applicant(s). At the
time of such visits, the notified body may conduct complete or partial audits and may carry out or cause to be carried
out tests in order to check the proper functioning of the quality management system where necessary. It must provide
the applicant(s) with an inspection report and, audit and/or test reports as appropriate.

6.5. The notified body chosen by the contracting entity and responsible for the EC verification, if not carrying out the
surveillance of all the quality management system(s) concerned as under point 5, must co ordinate the surveillance
activities of any other notified bodies responsible for that task, in order :

— to be ensured that correct management of interfaces between the different quality management systems relating

to subsystem integration has been performed.

— to collect, in liaison with the contracting entity, the necessary elements for the assessment to guarantee the

consistency and the overall supervision of the different quality management systems.

This co ordination includes the right of the notified body

— to receive all documentation (approval and surveillance), issued by the other notified body(s),

— to witness the surveillance audits as in point 5.4.,

— to initiate additional audits as in point 5.5. under its responsibility and together with the other notified body(s).

The notified body as referenced under point 5.1. must have entrance for inspection purposes, audit and surveillance to
the locations of design, building sites, production workshops, locations of assembly and installation, storage areas and.
where appropriate, prefabrication or testing facilities and, more general, to all premises which it considers necessary
for its task, in accordance with the applicant's specific contribution to the subsystem project.

The contracting entity, if involved, and the main contractors must, for a period of 10 years after the last subsystem has
been manufactured, keep at the disposal of the national authorities:

7.

8.

— the documentation referenced in the second indent of the second subparagraph of point 5.1,

— the updating referenced in the second subparagraph of point 5.5,

— the decisions and reports from the notified body which are referenced in the points 5.4, 5.5 and 6.4

9. Where the subsystem meets the requirements of the TSI, the notified body must then, based on the design
examination and the approval and surveillance of the quality management system (s), draw up the certificate of
conformity intended for the contracting entity, who shall in turn draw up the EC declaration of verification intended
for the supervisory authority in the Member State within which the subsystem is located and/or operates.

The EC declaration of verification and the accompanying documents must be dated and signed. The declaration must
be written in the same language of the technical file and must contain at least the information included in Annex V of
the Directive.

10.

The notified body chosen by the contracting entity shall be responsible for compiling the technical file that has to
accompany the EC declaration of verification. The technical file shall include at least the information indicated in Art
18 (3) of The Directive, and in particular as follows:

— all necessary documents relating to the characteristics of the subsystem

— the list of interoperability constituents incorporated into the subsystem,

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/425

— copies of the EC declarations of conformity and, where appropriate, of the EC declarations of suitability for use,
which the constituents must be provided in accordance with Article 13 of the Directive, accompanied, where
appropriate, by the corresponding documents (certificates, quality management system approvals and
surveillance documents) issued by the notified,

— evidence of conformity to other regulations deriving from the treaty (including certificates)

— all elements relating to the maintenance, the conditions and limits for use of the subsystem,

— all elements relating to the instructions concerning servicing, constant or routine monitoring, adjustment and

maintenance

— certificate of conformity of the notified body as mentioned under point 9, accompanied by corresponding
calculation notes and countersigned by itself, stating that the project complies with the Directive and the TSI,
and mentioning, where appropriate, reservations recorded during performance of the activities and not
withdrawn. The certificate should also be accompanied, if relevant, by the inspection and audit reports drawn up
in connection with the verification, as mentioned in points 6.4. and 6.5.;

— the Rolling Stock register, including all information as specified in the TSI.

11.

Each notified body must communicate to the other notified bodies the relevant information concerning the quality
management system approvals and the EC design examination reports, which it has issued, withdrawn or refused.

The other notified bodies may receive on request copies of :

— the quality management system approvals and additional approvals issued and

— the EC design examination reports and additions issued

12.

The records accompanying the certificate of conformity must be lodged with the contracting entity

The contracting entity must keep a copy of the technical file throughout the service life of the subsystem; it must be
sent to any other Member State which so requests.

L 344/426

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

ANNEX BB

STRUCTURES AND MECHANICAL PARTS

Fixing of tail lamps

BB.1 TAIL SIGNAL LAMP BRACKETS

Fig. BB1

signal lamp bracket

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/427

BB.2 TAIL SIGNAL LAMPS: SPACE REQUIRED — ENVELOPE

Fig. BB2

Space required envelope

L 344/428

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

ANNEX CC

STRUCTURE AND MECHANICAL PARTS

Sources of fatigue loading

CC.1 PAYLOAD SPECTRUM

CC.1.1 General

Changes in payload are likely to cause significant fatigue load cycles. Where the payload changes significantly, the time spent
at each load level shall be determined. Load/unload cycles should also be determined from the operator's specified duty and
represented in a suitable manner for analysis purposes. Where applicable, account shall be taken of changes to the
distribution of the payload and to the local pressure loads due to wheeled vehicles moving over the floor of the wagon.

CC.1.2 Track induced loading

Induced load cycles resulting from vertical, lateral and twist irregularities of the track shall be taken into account. These load
cycles may be determined from:

a)

dynamic modelling;

b) measured data;

c)

empirical data.

It is permissible to base fatigue design on load case data and assessment methods proven in the application where this exist.
Tables 15 and 16 of EN12663 give empirical data, in the form of wagon body accelerations consistent with normal
European operations suitable for an endurance limit approach to fatigue design when normal established data is available.

CC.1.3 Traction and braking

Load cycles due to traction and braking shall reflect the number of start-stops (including unscheduled ones) associated with
the intended mode of operation.

CC.1.4 Aerodynamic loading

Significant aerodynamic load input may arise due to:

a)

b)

c)

trains passing at speed;

tunnel operation;

cross winds.

If such loading generates significant cyclic stresses in the structure it shall be included in the fatigue assessment.

CC.1.5 Fatigue loads at interfaces

The dynamic load used in design shall be in a range of +/- 30 % of the vertical static load.

If this assumption is not chosen, then the following method shall be followed:

The main fatigue loads at the body-bogie connection are due to:

a)

b)

c)

load/unload cycles;

track input;

traction and braking.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/429

The interface shall be designed to carry the cyclic loads due these inputs.

Equipment attachments shall withstand the cyclic loads due to the motion of the wagon and any loads induced by the
operation of the equipment. The accelerations may be determined as described above. For normal European operations,
empirically derived accelerations for items of equipment that follow the motion of the wagon structure are given in tables
17, 18 and 19 of EN12663 and can be used where no more appropriate data is available.

Cyclic loads in coupling components shall be taken into account if the experience of the operator or designer indicates they
are significant.

L 344/430

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

ANNEX DD

ASSESSMENT OF MAINTENANCE ARRANGEMENTS

Open point, see § 6.2.2.3

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/431

ANNEX EE

STRUCTURES AND MECHANICAL PARTS

Footsteps and handrails

EE.1 GENERAL

Steps with corresponding handrails shall be provided at each location the staff stay in operation and where they are
necessary to allow having access to parts of the wagon in operation.

EE.2 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS

EE.2.1 Handrails

Handrails shall be of round bar steel 20 mm except for handrail specified in EE 2 with at least 30 mm in diameter. Handrails
for shunters are specified in EE3

The clearance between the handrails and the nearest obstructions shall be at least 120 mm.

EE.2.2 Dimension of footsteps

The steps at the end of the wagon, where the staff shall stay on, shall be 350 mm wide and 350 mm long, and shall be
placed as defined in Fig EE1. The step shall be designed with a non-slip surface. These steps shall be fixed by means, which
allow removable mounting of the footsteps (for instance by means of rivets or bolts fitted with a locked nut).

Fig. EE1

Disposition des Marchepieds et des mains courantes aux extrémités des wagons avec haussettes de bout step/
handrail arrangement at ends of wagons with end wall boards Tritt-Griff-Anordnung an Wagenenden mit
Stirnwandborden

L 344/432

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Fig EE2

Espace libre, Clearance, Freiraum

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/433

Fig. EE3

Hand rails for shunters

L 344/434

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

ANNEX FF

BRAKING

List of approved brake components

FF1. WHEEL SLIDE PROTECTION DEVICES

FF1.1. Wheel slide protection devices for new, existing, upgraded and renewed vehicles

Manufacturer

Type

Observations

FAIVELEY

OERLIKON

OERLIKON

FAIVELEY

FAIVELEY

OERLIKON

PARIZZI

AEF 82 C

Tested on disc brakes

GSE 201

GSE 202

Tested on disc brakes

Tested on disc brakes

AEF 83 P.1

Tested on disc brakes

AEF 83 P.2

Tested on shoe brakes

OMG 202

Tested on disc brakes

WUPAR 83

Tested on disc brakes

WABCO-WESTINGHOUSE

WGMC 19/1

Tested on disc brakes

FAIVELEY

MANNESMANN
REXROTH PNEUMATIK GmbH

SAB WABCO
KP GmbH

AEF 91 P1
AEF 91 P2 (1)

Tested on disc brakes

MRP-GMC 29

Tested on disc brakes

SWKP AS 20R

Tested on disc brakes

SAB WABCO KP GmbH

SWKP AS 20C

Confirm in January 1998: Type features
identical to AS 20R

Knorr-Bremse

DAKO

MGS 2

PE 94 MSV

(1) Combined disc/shoe braked coaches

FF1.2. Wheel slide protection devices for use on existing vehicles

The following list of WSP equipment is accepted for use on existing wagons, unless the brake system is upgraded or
renewed. Other upgrades or renewals of the wagon will not require the change to the WSP system

Manufacturer

Type

Observations

Mechanical Types
for speeds up to160 km/h

OERLIKON

inertia 4 GS1 & GSA

Tested on shoe brakes

preferably only for trailing stock
without its own electrical supply

KNORR

KNORR

MW

MWX

(1)

(1)

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/435

Manufacturer

Type

Observations

WESTINGHOUSE

WESTINGHOUSE

D1

WG

Electronic Types

(1)

Tested on disc brakes

WESTINGHOUSE

WGK

Tested on shoe brakes

GIRLING

SP

Tested on disc brakes

OERLIKON

GSE 100

(1)

PARIZZI

PARIZZI

KNORR

KOVOLIS

289

447

GR

DAKO

KRAUSS-MAFFEI

K Micro

OERLIKON

KNORR

GSE 200

MGS 1

Tested on shoe brakes

Tested on disc brakes

(1)

(1)

(1)

(1)

Tested on disc brakes

WABCO-WESTING-
HOUSE

WGMC 19

Tested on disc brakes

(1) Combined disc/shoe braked coaches

FF 2. COMPRESSED-AIR BRAKES FOR ‘FREIGHT TRAINS’ AND ‘PASSENGER TRAINS’

FF 2.1. Distributor Valves for new vehicles, upgraded and renewed vehicles

Brake type

Abbreviated description

Abbreviated name

Compressed-air brake

Freight train (G)
Passenger train (P)

Knorr brake

Oerlikon brake

Oerlikon brake

Knorr brake

Oerlikon brake

Oerlikon brake

Knorr brake

SAB-WABCO

SAB-WABCO

SAB-WABCO

DAKO brake

KE 1d (a) (b)
KE 2d (b),
KERd (c) (b)

ESG 121 (d) (e)

ESG 121-1 (d) (e)

KE 1 a/3,8 (a) (b) (f)

ESH 100 (g)

ESH 200 (h)

KE 1ad (a) (b)
KE 2ad (b)

SW 4 (i)

SW 4C (j)

SW 4/3 (k)

CV1 nD (l)

SAB-WABCO brake

C3WR (d) (e)

SAB-WABCO brake

C3W with AC3D (b)

SAB-WABCO brake

WU-C (d) (e)

KE

0

0

KE

0

0

KE

SW

SW

SW

OK

Ch

Ch

WU

G/P brake

G/P brake

G/P brake

G/P brake

G/P brake

G/P brake

G/P brake

G/P brake

G/P brake

G/P brake

G/P brake

G/P brake

G/P brake

G/P brake

L 344/436

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Brake type

Abbreviated description

Abbreviated name

Oerlikon brake

Est3f 1 HBG 300 (d) (m) (n)

MZT HEPOS — brake

Knorr-Bremse

MH3f/HBG310/100 (d)
MH3f/HBG310/200 (d)
MH3f/HBG310/3xx (c) (d)

KE1dv
KE2dv
KERdv (c)

0

MH

KE

Compressed-air brake

Freight train (G)
Passenger train (P)

G/P brake

G/P brake

G/P brake

Subsequent fitting of other relay valves not permitted.
For use in new vehicles up to 1.1.2007.
Brake assembly linked to a load-proportional braking system approved under section FF3.
Separate pressure reducing valve necessary if backfeed via main air supply pipe.
Brake assembly made up of distributor, relay and supports.

(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f) Additional maintenance measures on MAV to ensure that the maximum brake cylinder pressure of 3,8 bar is always achieved.
(g) No standard function up to 14 I attached brake cylinder or pre-control volumes.
(h)
(i)
(j)
(k)
(l) Distributor choke should be adapted in stages to the vehicle's auxiliary reservoir volumes.
(m) Only to be used with added relay.
(n)

Standard function.
SW 4 — controlled filling of auxiliary reservoir.
SW 4C — controlled filling of control reservoir with protection against overload when brake is released.
SW 4/3 — with the C3W cut-off valve (filling of control and auxiliary reservoirs almost identical times).

Identity test failed on certain points, hence the limited period of re-use of these distributors on PKP and ŐBB only until 1.1.2010.

FF 2.2. Valves for vehicles existing before 2005 which are upgraded or renewed

Brake type

Abbreviated description

Abbreviated name

Compressed-air brake

Freight train (G)
Passenger train (P)

Knorr

Dako

Westinghouse

Charmilles brake

KEs
KE 2c AL

CV
CV1

U

C 3 A

Oerlikon brake

Est 3f with HBG 300

Charmilles brake

Knorr brake

Westinghouse brake

Oerlikon brake

Oerlikon brake

Oerlikon brake

Oerlikon brake

Oerlikon brake

Oerlikon brake

Oerlikon brake

Oerlikon brake

Knorr brake

C 3 W

KE Od
KE 1d
KE 2d

C3 W2

ESG 101

ESG 121

ESG 131

ESG 141

ESG 101-1

ESG 121-1

ESG 131-1

ESG 141-1

KE 1 a/3,8

KE

DK

WU

Ch

0

Ch

KE

WE

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

KE

G/P brake

G/P brake

G/P brake

G/P brake

G/P brake

G/P brake

G/P brake

G/P brake

P brake

G/P brake

P brake

G/P brake

P brake

G/P brake

P brake

G/P brake

G/P brake

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/437

Brake type

Abbreviated description

Abbreviated name

Knorr brake

Oerlikon

Oerlikon

Knorr brake

Knorr brake

Knorr brake

SAB-WABCO

SAB-WABCO

SAB-WABCO

DAKO brake

KE Oa/3,8

ESH 100

ESH 200

KE 1 ad

KE 0 ad

KE 2 ad

SW 4 (a)

SW 4C (b)

SW 4/3 (c)

CV1 nD (d)

KE

O

O

KE

KE

KE

SW

SW

SW

DK

Compressed-air brake

Freight train (G)
Passenger train (P)

G/P brake

G/P brake
with non-universal action
where the connected brake
cylinder or pre-adjusted
volumes are up to 14 I

G/P brake with universal
action

G/P brake

G/P brake

G/P brake

G/P brake

G/P brake

G/P brake

G/P brake

SW 4 — controlled filling of Auxiliary Reservoir.
SW 4C — controlled filling of Auxiliary Reservoir with protection against over control reservoir overcharge when brake is released.
SW 4/3 — with the C3W cut-off valve (filling of A and R takes place in practically the same time).

(a)
(b)
(c)
(d) Distributor choke should be adapted in stages to the vehicle's R reservoir volumes.

FF 3. SELF-ADJUSTING LOAD-PROPORTIONAL BRAKING DEVICES APPROVED FOR INTERNATIONAL TRAFFIC

Manufacturer

Type

Abbreviated description

SAB

I — Mechanical features

Load-proportional valve and automatic load-
proportional distributor

AC 3 D

II — Pneumatic features

WESTINGHOUSE

Load-proportional valve and differential brake
cylinder

WDC 14 and WDC 16

KNORR

OERLIKON

OERLIKON

Load-proportional valve and dual brake cylinder

RLV 12/10 DGB 10"/12"

Load-proportional valve and dual brake cylinder

ALM-ALT

Mechanical drive system and dual brake cylinder

ALS-ALT

WESTINGHOUSE

16" brake cylinder

WDR

OERLIKON

KNORR

Relay valve for self-adjusting load-proportional
brakes with single brake cylinder

ALM/ALR 150

Relay valve for self-adjusting load-proportional
brakes with single brake cylinder

RLV 11d

METALSKI ZAVOD-TITO

Relay valve for self-adjusting load-proportional
brakes with single brake cylinder for high-speed
intercity traffic.

AKR SS/10

METALSKI ZAVOD-TITO

Relay valve for self-adjusting load-proportional
brakes with single brake cylinder for high-speed
intercity traffic.

AKR S/01

KNORR

Relay valve for self-adjusting load-proportional
brakes with single brake cylinder

RLV 11d

L 344/438

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

Manufacturer

Type

Abbreviated description

DAKO

DAKO

DAKO

DAKO

SAB-WABCO

SAB-WABCO

SAB WABCO

Relay valve for self-adjusting load-proportional
brakes DSS with load-proportional valve SL1 for
high-speed intercity traffic.

DAKO-DSS

Relay valve for self-adjusting load-proportional
brakes DS with load-proportional valve SL1 for
high-speed intercity traffic.

DAKO-DS

Load-proportional valve

DAKO-DSS SL1 or SL2

Load-proportional valve

DAKO-DS SL1 or SL2

Load-proportional valve and dual brake cylinder

SWDR-2

Relay valve for self-adjusting VCAV with
distributor SW4, SW4-C or SW4/3 and load-
proportional valve DP1 or F87

GF4 SS1
GF4 SS2
GF6 SS1
GF6 SS2

Relay valve for self-adjusting integrated VCAV
with distributor SW4, SW4-C or SW4/3 and
load-proportional valve DP1 or F87

GFSW4-D-AV
GFSW4-S-AV

FF 4. BRAKE PIPE EMPTYING ACCELERATORS ACCEPTED IN INTERNATIONAL SERVICES

Manufacturer

Type

Remarks

Dako-Kovalis

Dako-Z

Knorr-Bremse

Oerlikon-Buhrle

Davies and Metcalfe

MZT HEPOS

EB3

EB3-S

EB3-S/L

SB 3

SBS 100

BPA 1

VBK 100

Accepted for use in conjunction
with the CV1-R
type brake

Accepted for use in conjunction
with the KEs type brake

Fit for use with the NBŰ (~ SAFI)

Fit for use with the NBŰ (~ SAFI)

Accepted for use in conjunction
with the Est 3e type brake

Fit for use with the NBŰ (~ SAFI)

Fit for use with the NBŰ (~ SAFI)

FF 5. QUICK-RELEASE VALVES ACCEPTED IN INTERNATIONAL SERVICES

Table 1

Quick-release valves for modern brakes (a)

Manufacturer

Type

Installed in the distributor

OERLIKON

OERLIKON

CHARM ILLES

CHARM ILLES

LV3:LV3F

LV7

C3P1

C3P2

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/439

Manufacturer

Type

KNORR

WESTINGHOUSE (Italy)

WESTINGHOUSE (Italy)

KNORR

ALV3a, ALV7,ALV9,ALV9a

SA1

SA1V

AL V11

WESTINGHOUSE (Great Britain)

A1 and A2

Applicable to existing distributors, when their circuits provide for the emptying of the control reservoir only

OERLIKON

OERLIKON

LV3

LV4F

WESTINGHOUSE (France)

W 104, W 204

WESTINGHOUSE (Italy)

WESTINGHOUSE (Italy)

SA1

SA1V

(a) Modern brakes are understood as being those approved for international services after 1.1.1948

Table 2

Quick-release valves for old-type brakes

Manufacturer

Type

KNORR

OERLIKON

OERLIKON

WESTINGHOUSE (France)

WESTINGHOUSE (Italy)

WESTINGHOUSE (Italy)

KNORR

WESTINGHOUSE (Italy)

HARDY

AL V 4 (a)

LV3

LV4F

W 104, W 204

SA/CG, SA/RA

SA1

L2 (b)

SARAV

L3 (b)

(a)

The KNORR ALV4 quick-release valve is applicable to the modern KNORR KE distributor since the latter's release valve only empties the
control reservoir (the auxiliary reservoir is emptied by another means: isolating cock).

(b) Applicable only to the HIK distributor.

Table 3

Quick-release valves for modern (a) or old-type brakes

Manufacturer

Type

WESTINGHOUSE (France)

DAKO

KNORR

BDZ

W3,W4

0S1

ALV4b

BRV (b)

(a) Modern brakes are understood as being those approved for international services after 1.1.1948.
(b) Applicable only to the HIK distributor.

L 344/440

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

FF 6. BRAKE PADS FOR VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH DISC BRAKES, ACCEPTED FOR INTERNATIONAL TRAFFIC

Manufacturer/Product name

1

Type

2

Jurid

Becorit

Ferodo

Bremskerl

Bremskerl

Jurid

Bremskerl

Frendo

Jurid 869

Becorit 918 (1)

ID 425 L (2)

5818 (2)

6792 (1)

877 (1)

7240 (1)

2126 (2)

Faist Licence Textar

T 543 (2)

ICER 918 (2)

Remarks

4

up to 200 km/h

up to 200 km/h

up to 200 km/h

up to 200 km/h

up to 200 km/h

up to 200 km/h

up to 200 km/h

up to 200 km/h

up to 200 km/h

up to 200 km/h

ICER

Flertex

Rona (Hungary) Licence
Becorit

Textar

Frenoplast x.

Textar

Becorit

Bremskerl

Bremskerl

Italian Brakes

Flertex 664 HD (3)

up to 200 km/h

Rona 918 (2)

up to 200 km/h

T 550 (2)

FR20H.2 (2)

T550 (2)

V30 (2)

up to 200 km/h

up to 200 km/h

up to 200 km/h

up to 200 km/h

Bremskerl 2000 (2)

up to 200 km/h

7 699

FS 5M1 (1)

up to 200 km/h

up to 200 km/h

Railway request

5

SNCF

DB

FS

FS

DB

DB

DB

FS

FS

RENFE

SNCF

MAV

DB

PKP

DB

DB

DB

FS

FS

(1)
(2)
(3)

tested on cast-iron and cast-steel disc brakes
tested on cast-iron disc brakes
tested on cast-steel disc brakes

FF 7. AUTOMATIC ‘EMPTY-LOADED’ CONTROL MECHANISMS ACCEPTED IN INTERNATIONAL TRAFFIC

Manufacturer

Type

a)

multi-purpose usage

Westinghouse

SAB

SAB

KNORR

OERLIKON

b)

use only on loaded or empty wagons

Westinghouse

SAB

WAD

VA 2

DP 2

Du-111 WM

ALM/ALR 140

WAN

VTA

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/441

FF 8. TEST BENCHES ASSESSED UP TO JUNE 2004 AS CAPABLE OF CARRYING OUT ACCEPTANCE TESTS ON BRAKE

PADS

DB

FS

SNCF

CFR

CD

PKP

ZSR

Company

Location

Minden

Florence

Vitry MF1
Vitry MF3

Bucarest

Prague

Poznan

Zilina

L 344/442

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

ANNEX GG

SPECIFIC CASES

Irish loading gauges

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/443

L 344/444

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

ANNEX HH
SPECIFIC CASES
Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland
Interface between vehicles

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/445

ANNEX II

VEHICLE TRACK INTERACTION AND GAUGING

Assessment Procedure: Limits for modifications of freight wagons not requiring new approval

Freight wagons, which have changes, as given within the limits of this Annex, in the technical parameters in comparison to
the original design of the approved wagon shall not require a new conformity assessment

2a* ≥ 9m

2a* < 9m

2a* ≥ 8m

2a* < 8m

Empty vehicle

Loaded vehicle

Ct* ≤ 3

Ct* > 3

≥ 16t
(wagons with bogies)

≥ 12t
(2axle wagons)

Stiffness

Transitional loads

Distance between bogie centers
(wagons with bogies)

Vehicle wheel base
(2axle wagons)

Center of gravity height

Torsional stiffness
Ct * (1010 kN/mm2/rad)

Vehicle tare

Modification of max. wheel set load

Moment of inertia of vehicle body
(around z-axis — for 2axle wagons
only)

vertical suspension
primary or secondary

Rotational torque of bogie

Moment of inertia of whole bogie
(around z-axis)

Nominal wheel diameter

- 15 % to + ∞

- 5 % to + ∞

- 15 % to + ∞

- 5 % to + ∞

- 100 % to + 20 %

- 100 % to + 50 %

- 66 % to + 200 %

- 50 % to + ∞

- 15 % to + ∞

+ 1,5t

- 100 % to + 10 %

0 to + 25 %

- 5 % to 0

- 20 % to + 20 %

- 100 % to + 10 %

- 10 % to + 15 %

The proof of the above mentioned as well as accompanying criteria such as strength, braking performance, kinematic gauge,
etc is the manufacturer's or contracting entity's responsibility.

L 344/446

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

ANNEX JJ

OPEN POINTS

1

TSI CR RST VERSION 040913

1.1

4.2.3.3.2 Hot axle box detection

1.2

4.2.6.2 Aerodynamic effects

1.3

4.2.6.3 Cross winds

1.4

4.3.3 Traffic operation and management subsystem

Interfaces to the traffic and operation management subsystem are in consideration (references to this TSI are open points).

1.5

6.1.2.2

Assessment of welding joints shall be made according to national rules.

1.6

6.2.2.1

Assessment of welding joints shall be made according to national rules.

1.7

6.2.2.3 Assessment of Maintenance

The Annex DD remains an Open Point. This annex describes the procedure by which each member state ascertains that
maintenance arrangements meet the requirements of this TSI and the Essential Requirements during the subsystem lifetime.

1.8

6.2.3.4.2 Aerodynamic effects

1.9

6.2.3.4.3 Cross winds

2

ANNEXES

2.1 Annex B

B.3 Vehicle Load Table
4) Wagons that can be forwarded with the same loads as in S traffic at 120 km/h, shall have the sign ‘* *’ placed to the right
of the maximum load markings. The scope of application of ** (‘upgraded/renewed wagons’ only or ‘new and upgraded/
renewed wagons’) is still an open point

2.2 Annex B. 32 Marking of wagons and coaches built to gauges (GA, GB or GC)

Remain as open Point

2.3 Annex C.4 GA, GB, GC Vehicle gauges

Remains as an Open Point as this section refers to Annex B.32

2.4 Annex E

Wheel treads remain an open point until EN is published

2.5 Annex L

The specification of cast steel wheels is an open point. A new EN is requested.

2.6 Annex P

P.1.1 Distributor

P.1.2 Relay valve for variable load and automatic empty-load change-over

P.1.3 Wheel slide protection device

P.1.7 End Cocks

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/447

P.1.10 Brake blocks

The Test procedure for design assessment to be used for the interoperability constituent brake blocks is to be made in
accordance with the specification in Annex I section I.10.2. This specification is still an open point for composite blocks.

Composite brake blocks that are already in use have passed the assessment according to P.2.10 successfully:

UIC maintains the list of approved composite brake blocks (including geographical restrictions of use and conditions of use,
according to P.1.10 and P.2.10).

P.1.11 Accelerator valve

P.1.12 Automatic variable load sensing and empty/load changeover device

P.2.10 Brake blocks

— Geometrical assessment

Samples of each batch of blocks shall be dimensionally checked.

— Assessment procedure for composite brake blocks. The Test procedure is an open point

During the transitional period the assessment test performed by UIC shall at least comprise:

Rig Testing and Analysis

Composite brake blocks shall be assessed using a standardised test procedure and standardised test rig (ERRI B126/RP 18, 2.
version, March 2001). The following criteria shall be examined:

— Brake block performance in dry, wet and drag braking

— Probability of metal pickup from the wheel

— Performance in adverse winter weather conditions (e.g. snow, ice, low temperature)

— Performance in the case of brake failure (brakes locked on)

— Assessment of effects on the electrical resistance of the wheelset (including specific test of compatibility with track
circuits in the different countries where the vehicle is intended to operate)

Climactic Test Chamber Assessment

Before proceeding to on-vehicle brake performance tests, the composite brake block shall successfully complete a
programme of rig testing as described above.

Brake performance tests on the subsystem:

Composite brake blocks shall be:

— assessed according to Annex S of this TSI

— proven in operational service in Northern Europe throughout one complete winter period

— assessed for the affects on the electrical resistance of the wheelset

Service Evaluation for innovative products shall be conducted according to section 6

L 344/448

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

8.12.2006

ANNEX KK

INFRASTRUCTURE AND ROLLING STOCK REGISTER

Infrastructure register

Requirements for the Infrastructure Register

Data Item

Interoperability
Critical

Safety Critical

Basic Data

Type of traffic (mixed, passenger, freight, …)

Type of line (HS, CR)

Technical Information

Performance levels: maximum line speed in function of maximum axle load and
other items

Structure gauge

Track gauge

Maximum load per linear meter

Maximum track stressing
— Dynamic load (maximum vertical load to be exerted by the wheels on the rail)
— Transversal track forces
— Longitudinal track forces

Relation wheel diameter and axle load

Minimum radius of curvature: horizontal

Minimum radius of curvature: vertical

Maximum cant

Maximum cant deficiency

Cant deficiency in switches and crossings

Compliance with Annex A1 of the CCS TSI

Slip stream: RESERVED

Cross wind: RESERVED

Minimum distance between track centres

Track geometrical characteristics :
— track geometrical quality (EN 13848-1)
— track twist
— Maximum value of free wheel passage in switches
— Minimum value of fixed nose protection for common crossings
— Maximum value of free wheel passage at crossing nose
— Maximum value of free wheel passage at check/wing entry
— Minimum flangeway width
— Maximum permissible unguided length
— Minimum flangeway depth
— Maximum excess height of check rail

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

√

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/449

Data Item

Interoperability
Critical

Safety Critical

Restrictions

Environmental limitations:
Temperature range
— T(n) (-40 oC — + 35 oC),
— T(s) (-25 oC — + 45 oC),

Timescale restrictions:
For TN lines
Period of year when temperature expected to go below - 25 oC
day.month

For TS lines
Period of year when temperature expected to go above + 35 oC
day.month

√

√

√

√

√

√

L 344/450

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

28.7.2006

ANNEX YY

STRUCTURES AND MECHANICAL PARTS

Strength requirements for certain types of wagon components

INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
YY.1.
STRENGTH OF WAGON BODY STRUCTURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
YY.2.
YY.2.1.
Stresses due to the vertical load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
YY.2.2. Combined stresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
YY.2.3. Strength of the wagon floor to support industrial trucks and road vehicles(1). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
COVERED WAGONS WITH FIXED ROOF AND FIXED OR MOVING SIDE-WALLS AND COVERED
YY.3.
WAGONS WITH SLIDING ROOFS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
YY.3.1.
Strength of fixed side and end-walls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
YY.3.2. Strength of side doors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
YY.3.3. Strength of sliding walls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
YY.3.4.
Forces resulting from the passing of trains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
YY.3.5. Strength of lockable partitions of sliding-wall wagons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
YY.3.6. Strength of roof . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
YY.4. WAGONS WITH FULL OPENING ROOF (ROLLER ROOF AND HINGED ROOF)
YY.4.1. Wagons for the transport of heavy part-load goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
YY.4.2. Wagons for the transport of heavy bulk goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
YY.5.
HIGH-SIDED OPEN WAGONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
YY.5.1. Resistance of side-walls to transverse forces and of the edges of side and end rails to impacts . . . . . . . . . .
YY.5.2. Strength of the side doors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
FLAT WAGONS AND COMPOSITE FLAT/HIGH-SIDED WAGONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
YY.6.
YY.6.1.
Strength of the side and end flaps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
YY.6.2. Strength of the fixed side-wall flaps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
YY.6.3. Strength of the side stanchions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
YY.6.4. Strength of end stanchions
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GRAVITY DISCHARGE WAGONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
YY.7.
Strength of walls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
YY.8. WAGONS FOR THE CONVEYANCE OF ISO CONTAINERS AND/OR SWAP-BODIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
YY.8.1. Attachment of containers and swap-bodies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
YY.8.2. Strength requirements for the container/swap-body retention devices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
YY.8.3. Positioning of the container/swap-body retention devices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
REQUIREMENTS FOR OTHER PAYLOAD SECURING EQUIPMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
YY.9.
YY.10. DEPOT TOW HOOKS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

451
451
451
451
451

452
452
452
452
454
454
454
454
454
455
455
455
456
456
456
458
458
458
458
458
458
458
458
459
461
465

28.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/451

YY.1. INTRODUCTION

This appendix provides the requirements for the design of wagon components and load restraint systems applicable to types
of wagon in general use. The requirements shall be adopted only where they are appropriate to the intended application.

YY.2. STRENGTH OF WAGON BODY STRUCTURES

YY.2.1. Stresses due to the vertical load

For the vertical load case, the loads on the vehicle must be distributed:

— over a width of 2 m,

— in the case of open bogie wagons and open bogie flat wagons, over a width of 1,2 m,

— over the whole width of the floor,

according to which gives the more unfavourable stresses in the underframe.

The maximum deflection of the underframe under the applied load should not exceed 3 ‰ of the wheelbase or of the bogie
pivot pitch from the initial position (including the effects of any counter-deflection).

YY.2.2. Combined stresses

For certain types of wagons, such as those with offset/depressed decks,
combination of the stresses due to horizontal and vertical loading.

it is particularly important to consider the

Tank wagons designed for the transport of pressurised products must be designed to withstand, without sustaining residual
damage, both the load corresponding to the maximum permissible load capacity and that resulting from the maximum
working pressure (as defined by the RID) for which the tank has to be designed.

YY.2.3. Strength of the wagon floor to support industrial trucks and road vehicles (1) .

The wagon floor should be capable of withstanding the following loads without suffering any residual deformation:

— By industrial trucks:

— Simultaneous loading of each of the two front wheels of the truck with 30 kN;

— Bearing surface of a wheel 220 cm2 for a width of about 150 mm;

— Average mean distance between the front wheels of the industrial truck 650 mm.

— By road vehicles (only with flat wagons and mixed open/flat wagons):

— Loading with 65 kN per twin carrying wheel,

— Bearing surface of a twin carrying wheel of 700 cm2 for a wheel width of about 200 mm.

Note: Repetitive loads of this nature may need to be considered as fatigue load cases.

(1) Determination of the strength of freight wagon timber floors is the purpose of section 3A of ERRI Report B 12/DT 135 ‘Allgemein
anwendbare Berechnungsmethoden für die Entwicklung neuer Güterwagenbauarten oder Güterwagendrehgestelle’ (Generally applicable
calculation methods for the development of goods new types of goods wagons or goods wagon bogies). This Technical Document
contains details about the design of floors for new wagons. Tests need not be carried out if the floors correspond to the provisions of
ERRI B 12/DT 135.

L 344/452

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

28.7.2006

YY.3. COVERED WAGONS WITH FIXED ROOF AND FIXED OR MOVING SIDE-WALLS AND COVERED WAGONS WITH

SLIDING ROOFS

YY.3.1. Strength of fixed side and end-walls

At a height of 1 m above the floor the walls should sustain the forces defined below {acting from the inside out) .In the case
of refrigerator vans, the characteristics of the material from which the inner skin and the insulation are made should be
taken into account. There are four loading cases:

a)

transverse force applied to all side uprights;

b)

longitudinal force applied to all end posts;

c)

in the case of metal walls, transverse force acting on a point in the side-wall at the ventilation opening and along its
centre-line;

d)

in the case of metal walls, longitudinal force acting along the centre-Iine of the end-wall.

Load case

Minimum Design Load kN

Permissible Permanent Deformation — mm

a

b

c

d

8

40

10

18

2

1

3

2

For load cases c) and d) above the loaded area shall be 100 x 100 mm

Note: Walls made of wooden panels should sustain the same loads as metal walls and the panels should be manufactured in a
manner that ensures a consistent quality and performance.

YY.3.2. Strength of side doors

Sliding doors (single and two-leafed)

Transverse loading

The door(s) in closed position and locked, should sustain a horizontal normal force from the inside of the wagon outwards,
representing the forces produced by a shift in the load as well as by pressure differences resulting from the high-speed
passing of passenger trains in tunnels. This force is applied in the following conditions:

a)

at the centre of the door a force of 8kN applied over a 1x1 m area;

b)

at each connection/attachment point a force of 5 kN applied over 300x300 mm area.

No permanent deformation or loss of functionality should occur, either on the door itself (wall and framework) or on the
locking, sliding or guiding components as a result of these loads.

YY.3.3. Strength of sliding walls

The sliding walls, closed and locked, should resist a horizontal cross force applied from the inside of the wagon outwards.
This force represents the forces produced by a shift of the load as well as by pressure differences resulting from the high-
speed passing of passenger trains in tunnels. The load cases are as follows:

a)

Sliding walls which are less than 2,5 m long should meet the same load cases as sliding doors;

28.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/453

b)

Sliding walls from 2,5 m to 5 m long should have a 20 kN load applied at mid-wall over a 1x1 m area.

c)

Sliding walls over 5 m < 7 m long should have a 15 kN load applied in each case at a distance of 1/4 of the sliding wall
length from the end of the sliding wall and at a height of 1 m over a 1x1 m area.

d)

Sliding walls over 7 m long should have a 20 kN load applied in each case at a distance of 1/4 of the length of the
sliding wall from the end of the sliding wall and at a height of 1 m over a 1x1 m area.

Plus the application of a 10 kN load on the lower flange of a sliding wall between two connection/attachment points
immediately above floor level, over an area: 200 mm high by 300 mm wide.

L 344/454

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

28.7.2006

YY.3.4. Forces resulting from the passing of trains

Individual strength requirements for the outside connection/attachment points of the sliding wall (front surface over an area
200 mm high and 300 mm wide):

a)

with two-axled wagons and with bogie wagons with more than 2 sliding walls per side; force = 11,5 kN

b)

with bogie wagons with 2 sliding walls per side; force = 14 kN.

The point of application should be immediately above the floor and, in the roof area, as close as possible to the upper
connection/attachment point. It is permissible for the upper load to be applied to the vertical section of the sliding wall.

No permanent visible deformation or deterioration of the elements for closing, rolling and guiding the wall should result
from the application of the above loads. It must be possible to move the panels without difficulty. A permanent
deformation, equal at most to half the distance between the inner face of an opened wall and the maximum projecting point
of a closed wall, is permissible.

YY.3.5. Strength of lockable partitions of sliding-wall wagons

When the partition is locked a force which corresponds to a buffing impact of 5 t at a speed of 13 km/h and which simulates
the stresses produced by a paIletised load should be applied to a square surface area of 1x1 m , 600 m and 1 100 mm above
the top of the floor. The forces and deformation of the partition are to be measured. The deformation should not cause the
partition to become detached or cause damage to the locking mechanism.

A force of 50 kN should be applied to the seat of the lower lock over an area measuring 100 x 100 mm. There must be no
damage and no permanent deformation as a result of the load.

YY.3.6. Strength of roof

The roof must be able to withstand a force of 1 kN applied from outside inwards to a surface area of 200 cm2 without any
notable deformation.

In addition, sliding roofs must withstand a vertical force from the inside outwards of 4,5 kN per connection/attachment
point applied over a 300x300 mm square area. No deterioration or permanent deformation of the elements for closing,
rolling and guiding the sliding roofs should result from this load.

YY.4. WAGONS WITH FULL OPENING ROOF (ROLLER ROOF AND HINGED ROOF)

YY.4.1. Wagons for the transport of heavy part-load goods

Strength of side-walls

The side-walls should withstand a total force of 30 kN applied at the 4 door pillars, 1,5 m above the floor. Where applicable,
the elastic deformation of the upper wall member should be lower than the derailing limit of the roof. After removal of the
load, the roof should be in perfect working order.

28.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/455

Strength of side-wall door

The standard door requirements, 3.2, should be met.

Strength of roof

Where it is foreseeable that a person might walk on it, the roof should withstand the weight of a person walking over it. It
should be able to take a force of 1 kN at the most unfavourable point on an area of 300 x 300 mm.

YY.4.2. Wagons for the transport of heavy bulk goods

Strength of side-walls

According to 4.1.

Strength of side-wall door

According to 3.2.

Strength of roof

According to 3.6.

YY.5. HIGH-SIDED OPEN WAGONS

YY.5.1. Resistance of side-walls to transverse forces and of the edges of side and end rails to impacts

The following load cases apply, acting outwards in the horizontal direction at a level of 1,5 m above the floor:

a)

b)

c)

d)

a force of 100 kN applied at four centre posts of each side-wall, as indicated below;

a force of 40 kN applied at the corner posts of wagons equipped with drop ends;

25 kN at the middle of the upper side-wall rails;

60 kN at the middle of the upper rail of the end swing doors, for wagons equipped with these.

Note: For the tests a) and b), the stipulated forces should be applied twice successively and only the deformations measured
during the second load application should be taken into account.

The permanent deformation at the point where the force is applied should not exceed 1 mm. In addition, the elastic
deformation should not result in any encroachment of the loading gauge.

L 344/456

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

28.7.2006

Local deformation tests

Denting tests should be performed on the upper rails of the side-walls by applying a vertical force of 40 kN, as indicated
below. The permanent deformation at the point where the force is applied should not exceed 2 mm.

YY.5.2. Strength of the side doors

A horizontal force of 20 kN should be applied at a the height of the door locking bar or 1 m above the floor and on the
centre-line of the opening. The permanent deformation must not exceed 1 mm on the door itself, and no deterioration or
permanent deformation of the bridges or closing elements should result.

YY.6. FLAT WAGONS AND COMPOSITE FLAT/HIGH-SIDED WAGONS

YY.6.1. Strength of the side and end flaps

The requirement is to carry the load due to a lorry loaded to 65 kN per twin carrying wheel bearing on a total surface of
700 cm2 {width of wheel about 200 mm) on the flaps lowered onto the buffers or onto supports rigidly fastened to the
buffer beam in the case of the end flaps, and onto a high platform in the case of the side flaps.

No visible permanent deformation should result from the application of this load case.

28.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/457

For the end flaps made of aluminum alloy, additional dynamic tests might be required.

In addition to the above, the load cases and static tests shown below are also to be applied.

End Flap

Side Wall Flap

L 344/458

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

28.7.2006

YY.6.2. Strength of the fixed side-wall flaps

The fixed side-wall flaps should be subjected to a force of 30 kN, applied over an area measuring about 350 x 200 mm at
the edge, directed horizontally from inside the wagon towards the outside and applied at the middle of the side.

YY.6.3. Strength of the side stanchions

Pivoting or removable side stanchions should take the following loads:

— An outward horizontal load of 35 kN acting at 500 mm from the centre of the bore-hole (swivelling Stanchion)

— An outward horizontal load of 35 kN acting at 500 mm from the upper fixation flange (removable stanchion).

YY.6.4. Strength of end stanchions

Each end stanchion should take an outward horizontal load of 80 kN acting at 350 mm above the top surface of the floor.

YY.7. GRAVITY DISCHARGE WAGONS

YY.7.1. Strength of walls

The walls should sustain the maximum permissible loads due to the goods they are intended to carry.

YY.8. WAGONS FOR THE CONVEYANCE OF ISO CONTAINERS AND/OR SWAP-BODIES

YY.8.1. Attachment of containers and swap-bodies

ISO containers and swap-bodies should be attached to rail vehicles using devices that engage with the load units’ ISO corner
castings or corner plates. Devices currently used for this purpose include spigots and twistlocks.

YY.8.2. Strength requirements for the container/swap-body retention devices

The container/swap-body retention devices, their associated mountings and their attachment to the vehicle should be
capable of withstanding the following accelerations, applied to the maximum gross container/swap-body mass. The resulting
force is to be applied at the base plane of the container/swap-body when restrained by the quantity of devices indicated in
the table, these being assumed to share the load evenly. The fatigue loads are to be considered acting in phase for 107 cycles,
or the number of cycles corresponding to the endurance limit in the fatigue design code (if this is less).

Proof Loads

Fatigue Loads

Direction

Acceleration

Number of restraining locations

Longitudinal

Transverse

Vertical Downward

Vertical Upward

Longitudinal

Transverse

Vertical

2g

1g

2g

1g

Restrained at any 2 locations

Restrained at any 2 locations

Restrained at 4 locations

Restrained at any 2 locations

± 0,2g

Restrained at 4 locations

± 0,25g

Restrained at 4 locations

± 0,6g

Restrained at 4 locations

The spigot installation should withstand, without undergoing deformation that would render it unfit for use, an upward
vertical load of 150kN applied along the spigot centreline.

28.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/459

YY.8.3. Positioning of the container/swap-body retention devices

Longitudinal positioning

The retention devices shall be positioned so as to be compatible with the lengths of container/swap-body that the wagon has
been specified to carry. The following table lists the longitudinal distances between retention devices for different lengths of
Container and Swap-body:

Container/swap-body Dimension
Code

1

2

3

4

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

K

L

M

N

P

Container/swap-body Length

mm

2 991

6 058

9 125

12 192

7 150

7 315

7 420

7 430

7 800

8 100

12 500

13 106

13 600

13 716

14 630

14 935

16 154

ft in

10’

20’

30’

40’

24’

24’6”

41”

43”

45”

48”

49”

Longitudinal distance between
retention devices (mm)

2 787 ± 2

5 853 ± 3

8 918 ± 4

11 985 ± 5

5 853 ± 3

5 853 ± 3

5 853 ± 3

5 853 ± 3

5 853 ± 3

5 853 ± 3

11 985 ± 5

11 985 ± 5

11 985 ± 5

11 985 ± 5

11 985 ± 5

11 985 ± 5

11 985 ± 5

L 344/460

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

28.7.2006

Lateral Positioning

Fixed Retention Devices

Fixed retention devices should be positioned laterally 2 259+2 mm apart on the wagon.

Fold-down spigots

The functional dimensions (a1, a2 and C) for pairs of spigots after removal of play in the direction indicated by the arrows.
These functional dimensions should be observed when running, irrespective of the type of construction of spigots (fixed or
fold-down):

Spigot Dimensions

The permissible operational dimensions for the spigot are as follows:

Dimension at manufacture

Limit dimension when running

R3

45o

4 +0,5/0

90o 0/+1,5

Maximum R15

Maximum 65o

Minimum 3,5 mm

Maximum 90o 0/+2,0 (see Note)

Note: When exerting a lateral force on the head of the spigot in the direction of the centre of the wagon (i.e. removal of all
play), the angle should be measured between the body of the spigot and a steel rule placed at right angles to the sole-bars of
the opposing spigots.

28.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/461

The dimensions of spigots at manufacture should be as follows:

YY.9. REQUIREMENTS FOR OTHER PAYLOAD SECURING EQUIPMENT

The minimum proof strength requirements for winches, webbing straps and payload-securing rings are as follows:

Payload restraint winches for use with load restraint webbing straps should be capable of withstanding a load of 76kN.

Payload restraint webbing straps should have a strength-rating of at least 45 kN.

Other requirements are as given in the table below as examples for a range of existing European freight wagons.

L 344/462

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

28.7.2006

Wagon Type and length over
buffers

Alphacode

Type, number and position of load
securing devices required

Load case (or dimensions) for each load
securing device

Types 1 and 3 Two-axle
covered wagons
14,02m

Gbs

Type 2 Two-axle covered
wagons
10,58m

Gs

Types 3 Two-axle covered
wagons
14,02m

Hbfs

Two-axle Open high-sided
wagons 10,0m

Es

18 hinged ring or fixed fastening
bar securing devices on each side
wall with 8 in the upper row
(1,1m above the floor) and 10 in
the lower row (0,35m above the
floor).

Securing rings should be made
from round-bar steel of at
least
14mm diameter.

If wagons are fitted with securing
devices
located in the wagon
floor then 6 should be fitted,
evenly distributed along each of
the side walls (12 in total).

Should be able to withstand a
tensile force of 85kN applied at
an angle of 45o to the floor surface
and 30o to the longitudinal centre-
line of the wagon.

14 hinged ring or fixed fastening
bar securing devices on each side
wall with 6 in the upper row and
8 in the lower row.

Securing rings should be made
from round-bar steel of at
least
14mm diameter.

If wagons are fitted with securing
devices
located in the wagon
floor then 4 should be fitted,
evenly distributed along each of
the side walls (8 in total).

Should be able to withstand a
tensile force of 85kN applied at
an angle of 45o to the floor surface
and 30o to the longitudinal centre-
line of the wagon.

18 hinged ring or fixed fastening
bar securing devices on each side
wall with 8 in the upper row
(1,1m above the floor) and 10 in
the lower row (0,35m above the
floor).

Securing rings should be made
from round-bar steel of at
least
14mm diameter.

If wagons are fitted with securing
devices
located in the wagon
floor then 4 should be fitted,
evenly distributed along each of
the side walls (8 in total).

Should be able to withstand a
tensile force of 85kN applied at
an angle of 45o to the floor surface
and 30o to the longitudinal centre-
line of the wagon.

To enable sheeting or securing of
the load, securing devices should
be fixed to the outside of the
vehicle body, 8 on each side wall.

Fastening bars or rings for sheet-
ing purposes. 24 on the outside
of the drop sides and 8 on the
outside of the drop ends.

Should be made of round-bar steel
at least 16mm in diameter

Should be made of round-bar steel
of at least 16mm diameter.

Two-axle Flat wagons
13,86m

Ks

8 rings or fastening bars (4 per
side wall) flush with the inside of
the drop sides

Should be made of round-bar steel
of at least 16mm diameter.

12 fastening devices embedded in
the
distributed
evenly
along each side wall.

floor,

12 sheeting rings affixed to the
outside edge of the floor along
each side wall and 4 along each
end wall

Should be able to withstand a
tensile force of 170kN applied at
an angle of 45o to the floor surface
and 30o to the longitudinal centre-
line of the wagon.

Should be made of round-bar steel
of at least 16mm diameter.

4 securing rings should be affixed
to the same edge along each side
wall.

Should be made of round-bar steel
of at least 16mm diameter.

Two-axle Open High-sided/
flat composite wagons
13,86m

Os

28.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/463

Wagon Type and length over
buffers

Alphacode

Type, number and position of load
securing devices required

Load case (or dimensions) for each load
securing device

Type 1 bogie Covered
wagons
16,52m

Gas/Gass

16 hinged rings or fixed fastening
i.e. 8 on each side wall.
bar
at
should be
Devices
fixed
0,35m above floor
level and
must not protrude.

No strength requirement specified.

Type 2 bogie Covered
wagons
21,7m

Gabs/Gabss

Type 1 High-sided open
bogie wagons
14,04m

Eas/Eaos

Type 2 High-sided open
bogie wagons
15,74m

Eanos

14 securing devices situated on
the side walls i.e. one at each end
of
the side walls, one at each
door upright and one in the
centre of each side wall. The
devices
situated
approximately 1,5m above floor
level. They must be flush with the
wall.

should

be

13 securing rings on each side
wall fixed on the outside of the
body.
2 securing rings on each end wall
fixed on the outside of the body.

6 securing rings on each side wall
fixed on the inside of the body.
2 securing rings on each end wall
fixed on the inside of the body.
The devices should be spaced as
regularly
an
as possible
approximate height of 0,2m
above floor level and must be
flush with the walls when not in
use.

at

14 securing rings on each side
wall fixed on the outside of the
body.
2 securing rings on each end wall
fixed on the outside of the body.

Should be able to withstand a
tensile force of 40kN exerted in a
parallel direction to the longitudi-
nal centreline of the wagon.

Should be made of round-bar steel
of at least 16mm diameter.

Should be able to withstand a
tensile force of 40kN applied at
an angle of 45o to the floor surface
and 30o to the longitudinal centre-
line of the wagon.

Should be made of round-bar steel
of at least 16mm diameter.

36 rings on the side solebars

Should be made of round-bar steel
of at least 16mm diameter.

Type 1 Flat bogie wagons
(without drop sides)
19,9m

Rs/Res

8 rings on the outside of
drop ends

the

Should be made of round-bar steel
of at least 16mm diameter.

18 hooks on the side solebars.

Each hook should have a cross-
section at
to a
diameter of 40mm.

least equivalent

36 rings on the side solebars

Should be made of round-bar steel
of at least 16mm diameter.

8 rings on the outside of
drop ends

the

Should be made of round-bar steel
of at least 16mm diameter.

Type 1 Flat bogie Wagons
(with drop sides)
19,9m

Rns/Rens

18 fastening bars flush with the
inside of the drop sides/ends

Should be made of round-bar steel
of at least 16mm diameter.

distributed

18 securing devices in the floor
evenly
the
length and must not protrude
above floor level when not in
use.

along

Should be able to withstand a
tensile force of 170kN applied at
an angle of 45o to the floor surface
and 30o to the longitudinal centre-
line of the wagon.

L 344/464

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

28.7.2006

Wagon Type and length over
buffers

Alphacode

Type, number and position of load
securing devices required

Load case (or dimensions) for each load
securing device

24 rings on the side solebars

Should be made of round-bar steel
of at least 16mm diameter.

Type 2 Flat bogie Wagons
(without drop-sides)
14,04m

Rmms/
Rmmns

8 rings on the outside of
drop ends

the

Should be made of round-bar steel
of at least 16mm diameter.

14 hooks on the side solebars.

Each hook should have a cross-
section at
to a
diameter of 40mm.

least equivalent

24 rings on the side solebars

Should be made of round-bar steel
of at least 16mm diameter.

8 rings on the outside of
drop ends

the

Should be made of round-bar steel
of at least 16mm diameter.

Type 2 Flat bogie Wagons
(without drop sides)
19,9m

Remms/
Remmns

12 fastening bars flush with the
inside of the drop sides/ends

Should be made of round-bar steel
of at least 16mm diameter.

Bogie Wagon with opening
roof
14,04m — 14,29m

Taems

Type 1 Covered bogie
wagons with sliding walls
21,7m

Habiss

Type 2A Covered bogie
wagons with sliding walls
24,13m

Habbins

Should be able to withstand a
tensile force of 170kN applied at
an angle of 45o to the floor surface
and 30o to the longitudinal centre-
line of the wagon.

Should be able to withstand a
tensile force of 170kN applied at
an angle of 45o to the floor surface
and 30o to the longitudinal centre-
line of the wagon.

Should be able to withstand a
tensile force of 85kN applied at
an angle of 45o to the floor surface
and 30o to the longitudinal centre-
line of the wagon.

distributed

12 securing devices in the floor
evenly
the
length and must not protrude
above floor level when not in
use.

along

floor may

The wagon
be
equipped with 6 securing devices,
evenly distributed on each side of
the wagon (12 in total). If such
devices are fitted, then they must
be flush with the floor when not
in use
the
strength requirements specified
in the adjacent column.

and must meet

is

It
the
recommended that
wagon floor be fitted with 16
securing devices. If such devices
are fitted then they should be
spaced at intervals of 4 370mm/
600mm/4 200mm/1 000mm/
4 200mm/600mm/4 370mm in
the longitudinal direction. In the
devices
lateral
should be positioned 970mm
from the longitudinal centre-line
of
the wagon. They must no
protrude above the floor when
not in use.

direction,

the

The wagon should be provided
with 16 securing devices in the
floor. The fittings
should be
spaced at uniform intervals along
each side wall. They must no
protrude above the floor when
not in use.

Should be able to withstand a
tensile force of 85kN applied at
an angle of 45o to the floor surface
and 30o to the longitudinal centre-
line of the wagon.

the wagon
Each end wall of
should be provided with 4 secur-
ing fittings, arranged in sets of 2
near each corner upright inside
the wagon at heights of about
0,75 and 1,5m above the floor.

Should be able to withstand a
tensile force of 30kN in all direc-
tions when this force is exerted
simultaneously on two fittings at
the same height.

28.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/465

Wagon Type and length over
buffers

Alphacode

Type, number and position of load
securing devices required

Load case (or dimensions) for each load
securing device

Two-axle covered wagons
with sliding walls Types 1A
and 2A
14,2m and 15,5m respec-
tively

Hbins/Hbbins

Bogie flat wagons fitted with
a mechanical sheeting sys-
tem, 19,9m and 20,09
respectively

Rils/Rilns

Flat wagons with 2 three-
axle bogies
16,4m

Sammns

Wagon should be provided with
12 load securing fixings in the
floor. They must be positioned at
uniform intervals along each side.
They must not protrude above
the floor when not in use.

the wagon
Each end wall of
should be provided with 4 secur-
ing fittings, arranged in sets of 2
near each corner upright inside
the wagon at heights of about
0,75 and 1,5m above the floor.
These fittings must not protrude
from the wall when not in use.

recommended that 10
It
is
retractable
rings be
securing
fitted. The securing rings should
be evenly distributed in the long-
itudinal direction and should be
flush with the floor when not in
use.

It is recommended that 4 secur-
ing rings be fitted on the inner
surfaces of the end walls.

Should be able to withstand a
tensile force of 85kN applied at
an angle of 45o to the floor surface
and 30o to the longitudinal centre-
line of the wagon.

Should be able to withstand a
tensile force of 30kN in all direc-
tions when this force is exerted
simultaneously on two fittings at
the same height.

Should be able to withstand a
tensile force of 170kN applied at
an angle of 45o to the floor surface
and an angle of 30o with the
vertical plane of the wagon’s long-
itudinal axis.

No strength requirement specified

26 round steel rings should be
fixed to the solebars

Should be made of round-bar of at
least 16mm diameter

12 securing rings should be fixed
to the floor and they should be
evenly distributed along each side
of the wagon and should be flush
with the floor when not in use.

Should be able to withstand a
tensile force of 170kN applied at
an angle of 45o to the floor surface
and an angle of 30o with the
vertical plane of the wagon’s long-
itudinal axis.

YY.10. DEPOT TOW HOOKS

Where fitted, tow hooks shall conform with the following requirements :

Wagon feature

Number of Hooks

Location of Hooks

One or two gangways or end platforms, and
underframe width ≤ 2 500mm

One on each side

Free

General case

One on each side

In the middle of the wagon

Design making it impossible to fit one hook in
the middle of the wagon

Two on each side

Near the corners

The hook and its fastening to the underframe shall be strong enough to allow a rake with a total mass of 240 t, to be towed
with a single hook, with the pull exerted outward at an angle of 30 degrees in relation to the centreline of the track. To
achieve this the hook shall be designed to carry a tractive force of 50 kN.

Notes

1.

The tow hook shall be positioned such that there is no danger of damaging the steps, coupler control levers and brake
control handles by the towing cable.

L 344/466

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

28.7.2006

2.

3.

The tow hook shall be positioned so as to avoid any risk of a shunter's clothing (particularly trouser legs) becoming
caught when climbing on or off a step.

To reduce the potential danger to staff at the side of the train no parts of tow hooks shall protrude by more than
250mm beyond the wagon underframe or body. Where parts of the hook protrude by between 150mm and 250mm
beyond the wagon underframe or body, the hook and its support shall be painted yellow.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/467

ANNEX ZZ

STRUCTURES AND MECHANICAL PARTS

Permissible Stress Based on Elongation Criteria

ZZ.1. STRUCTURAL STEELS

For structural steels, the margin of safety represented by factor S2 in clause 3.4.3 of EN12663:2000 can be determined from
the material elongation at failure. The table below gives a reduced value for S2 and acceptable criteria using this approach
that have been proven in service.

Material Property

R < 0,8 Rm

Factor S2

S2 ≥1,25

Parent Metal

R > 0,8 Rm; A > 10 %

S2 < 1,25

R > 0,8Rm; A < 10 %

S2 ≥1,25

R < 0,8 Rm

S2 ≥1,25

Weld Metal

R > 0,8 Rm; A > 10 %

S2 < 1,25

R > 0,8 Rm; A < 10 %

S2 ≥1,25

Permissible stress

σc ≤ R

σc ≤ R

σc (cid:20)

Rm
1,25

σc (cid:20)

σc (cid:20)

R
1,1

R
1,1

σc (cid:20)

Rm
1,375

Note: Notation is as in EN12663:2000; A = material elongation at failure.

ZZ.2. OTHER STRUCTURAL MATERIALS

For other structural materials, the permissible stress shall be the lower value of the material yield (or proof stress) and the
material ultimate stress divided by factor S2 as defined in clause 3.4.3 of EN12663. S2 shall be taken as 1,5 unless the criteria
given in the Euronorm permit a lower value.