Case F-60/06: Action brought on  12 May 2006  — Stump and Camba Constenla v Court of Justice
Date: 2006-07-15
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: Court of Justice of the European Union, European official, action by staff, personnel administration, professional career, recruitment, regulations for civil servants

15.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/35

Action brought on 12 May 2006 — Stump and Camba
Constenla v Court of Justice

(Case F-60/06)

(2006/C 165/70)

bono at EUR 200 000 for the moral prejudice and the
payment of the salary of the applicant from July 2005 to
15 October 2009 for the material prejudice;

— order the defendant to bear the costs of the proceedings.

Language of the case: French

Pleas in law and main arguments

Parties

Applicants: Krisztina Stump and Carmen Camba Constenla
(Luxembourg, Luxembourg)
(represented by: S. Orlandi, A.
Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Defendant: Court of Justice of the European Communities

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Tribunal should:

— Annul the decisions appointing the applicants officials of
the European Communities in so far as the decisions set
their grade of recruitment in accordance with Article 12 or
13 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations;

— Order the Court of Justice to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of their action, the applicants rely upon pleas in law
very similar to those put forward in Case F-12/06 (1).

(1) OJ C 86, 8.4.2006, p. 48.

Action brought on 12 May 2006 — Sapara v Eurojust

(Case F-61/06)

(2006/C 165/71)

Language of the case: English

Parties

The applicant, a former temporary agent of Eurojust, challenges
the decision to terminate her contract at the end of the proba-
tionary period.

In support of her claims, she relies on the following pleas:

— infringement of Article 14 of the Conditions of Employ-
ment of Other Servants of the Communities (CEOS) and of
Article 9 of the Staff Regulations;

— breach of the general principle of law imposing the motiva-

tion of any act affecting the applicant's interests;

— flagrant errors in the appraisal of facts leading to errors in

law;

— breach of the general principle of good administration and

of the rights of defence;

— misuse of power.

regards

the request

As
the applicant
considers that she has been the victim of harassment an that
she has been defamed on several occasions.

for compensation,

Action brought on 23 May 2006 — Guarnieri v Commis-
sion

(Case F-62/06)

(2006/C 165/72)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Daniela Guarnieri
(represented by: E. Boigelot, lawyer)

(St-Stevens-Woluwe, Belgium)

Applicant: Cathy Sapara (The Hague, The Netherlands) (repre-
sented by: G. Vandersanden and C. Ronzi, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant: Eurojust

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

— annul the decision of 6 July 2005 to terminate the appli-
cant's contract and order her reintegration in Eurojust from
that date;

— order the compensation of the prejudice suffered by the
applicant, evaluated on a provisional basis ex aequo et

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

— Annul

the Commission's decision of 5 August 2005
adversely affecting the applicant in that, pursuant to the
rule against overlapping allowances laid down in Article
it deducts the Belgian
67(2) of
orphans' pension from the family allowance and declares,
as a result, that a given amount will be withheld from her
pay in accordance with Article 85 of the Staff Regulations;

the Staff Regulations,