European Parliament resolution on EU-US transatlantic economic relations (2005/2082(INI))
Date: 2006-06-01
Institutions: Committee on International Trade, European Parliament
Subjects: United States, cooperation policy, economic cooperation, energy policy, research and development, trade cooperation

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298 E/235

Thursday 1 June 2006

Insists that the stakeholders and legislators should be actively involved in the dialogue mechanisms

55.
on regulatory cooperation;

Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments

56.
and parliaments of the Member States and the President and Congress of the United States of America.

*

*

*

P6_TA(2006)0239

EU-US economic relations

European Parliament resolution on EU-US transatlantic economic relations (2005/2082(INI))

The European Parliament,

— having regard to the Transatlantic Declaration on EC-US relations of 1990, the New Transatlantic
Agenda (NTA) of 3 December 1995 (1) and the Transatlantic Economic Partnership (TEP) of 18 May
1998 (2),

— having regard to the Commission Communication of 11 March 1998 entitled ‘The New Transatlantic

Marketplace’ (NTM) (COM(1998)0125),

— having regard to the Bonn Declaration of 21 June 1999 (3) and, in particular, to its sections on ‘Promot-

ing Prosperity and Development in a Rapidly Changing World’ and ‘Improving Early Warning’,

— having regard to the ‘Positive Economic Agenda’ of 2 May 2002 (4),

— having regard to its resolution of 9 June 2005 on transatlantic relations (5) as well as to its previous
resolutions of 17 May 2001 (6), 13 December 2001 (7), 15 May 2002 (8) and 19 June 2003 (9), and to its
resolutions of 22 April 2004 (10) and 13 January 2005 (11),

— having regard to the Commission Communication of 20 March 2001 entitled ‘Reinforcing the Trans-

atlantic Relationship: Focusing on Strategy and Delivering Results’ (COM(2001)0154),

— having regard to the Commission Communication of 18 May 2005 entitled ‘A stronger EU-US Partner-

ship and a more open market for the 21st century’ (COM(2005)0196),

— having regard to the 2004 Declaration on ‘Strengthening Our Economic Partnership’ (12),

— having regard to the outcome of the EU-US Summit held on 20 June 2005 in Washington DC and, in
particular to its Economic Initiative: ‘The European Union and the United States Initiative to enhance
Transatlantic Economic Integration and Growth’,

— having regard to the Joint EU-US Work Programme for the implementation of the above-mentioned
Economic Initiative adopted at the informal EU-US Economic Ministerial Meeting of 30 November
2005,

JO C 124 E, 25.5.2006, p. 556.

Joint statement adopted at the EU-US Summit in London.

(1) Signed at the EU-US Summit in Madrid.
(2)
(3) Signed at the EU-US Summit in Bonn.
(4) Agreed at the EU-US Summit in Washington.
(5)
(6) OJ C 34 E, 7.2.2002, p. 359.
(7) OJ C 177 E, 25.7.2002, p. 288.
(8) OJ C 180 E, 31.7.2003, p. 392.
(9) OJ C 69 E, 19.3.2004, p. 124.
(10) OJ C 104 E, 30.4.2004, p. 1043.
(11) OJ C 247 E, 6.10.2005, p. 151.
(12) Signed at the EU-US Summit in Shannon, 25-26 June 2004.

C 298 E/236

Thursday 1 June 2006

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

8.12.2006

— having regard to US Congress Draft House Resolution 77 on Transatlantic Relations presented on

9 February 2005,

— having regard to the study by the OECD on the benefits of liberalising product markets and reducing
barriers to international trade and investment (‘Preferential Trading Arrangements in Agricultural and
Food Markets — The Case of the European Union and the United States’, published in March 2005),

— having regard to its resolution of 1 December 2005 on preparations for the Sixth Ministerial Confer-

ence of the World Trade Organisation in Hong Kong (1),

— having regard to the European Parliament hearing organised by the Committee on International Trade

on 26 May 2005 concerning transatlantic economic relations,

— having regard to the working document of the Committee on International Trade (PE 364.940),

— having regard to its resolution of 1 June 2006 on improving EU-US relations in the framework of a

Transatlantic Partnership Agreement (2),

— having regard to Rule 45 of its Rules of Procedure,

— having regard to the report of the Committee on International Trade and the opinions of the Com-
mittee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, Committee on
the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, Committee on Transport and Tourism and Committee on
Culture and Education (A6-0131/2006),

A. whereas this resolution concentrates primarily on EU-US economic relations, it should be acknowledged

that the transatlantic relationship includes all European and American States,

B. whereas deeper integration is the natural outcome for two economies that share similar backgrounds,
resource endowments and economic models but which for historical, cultural and economic reasons
will never be identical;

C. whereas economic ties between the EU and the US are an important stabilising factor for the trans-
atlantic relationship in general and have grown so significantly over the last decades that both partners
have an increasing stake in each other's economic development,

D. whereas solid political and economic relations and the development of common standards between the
EU and the US have an automatic positive spillover effect on North American Free Trade Agreement
countries,

E. whereas the European Union and the United States should commit themselves, within the framework of
their partnership and in a wider framework of world governance, to promoting international and multi-
lateral standards in the field of trade (WTO), social matters (ILO) and the environment (IPCC and
UNEP),

F. whereas the most important trade barriers between the EU and the US are in agriculture, including
tariffs, quotas, production, export and fiscal subsidies and technical barriers, and whereas levels of
protection for trade in services have remained high while tariffs on manufactured goods have been
progressively abolished with the exception of products in sensitive sectors,

G. whereas greater political

leadership and vision is needed in order to update the New Transatlantic
Agenda (NTA) of 1995 and the Transatlantic Economic Partnership of 1998 to take account of new
realities and old conflicts and to continue to deepen transatlantic ties,

(1) Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2005)0461.
(2) Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2006)0238.

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298 E/237

Thursday 1 June 2006

H. whereas Europe and the US must venture into the future on the clear assumption that a stronger
transatlantic bond will have global implications and therefore must take into due consideration the
interests of other economic players, countries and peoples in order to share prosperity more equally
and to successfully address the global challenges in the inter-related fields of security, world economic
governance, the environment and poverty reduction,

I. whereas the EU-US bilateral economic relationship and the multilateral agenda should be seen in the
light of a complementary and mutually reinforcing positive process, and whereas the benefits from an
even more integrated market will spill over onto the wider economic relationship of Europe with the
Americas, provided that regional interests are taken into due account in regional negotiations on mar-
ket integration,

J. whereas the use of different economic and legal instruments and procedures to address the same situ-
ations should be properly managed within the transatlantic economic partnership to prevent the dis-
solution of the transatlantic market,

K. whereas a more harmonised regulatory environment between the EU and the US would be beneficial
for all countries in general and for neighbouring trading partners and developing countries in particu-
lar,

L. Whereas the Financial Services Action Plan, with Parliament's successful support, has played an import-
ant role in creating more competitive EU capital markets, which have strengthened Europe's competi-
tiveness,

M. whereas the increasing speed of change inherent in our technological and informational societies sug-
gests that the EU should make a greater qualitative and quantitative effort in the sector of scientific and
technological research so as to bridge sufficiently the ‘technological divide’ which separates it from the
corresponding US sector, thus ensuring appropriate conditions for parity in bilateral trade,

N. whereas strengthened transatlantic economic relations can provide vital input for achieving the Lisbon

objectives,

A de facto Transatlantic Market

1.
Stresses that although it may have appeared in recent years that the strain on EU-US relations in the
political field had at times affected the economic sphere; and whereas it may have also appeared as if the
appeal of globalization and emerging markets such as China, India and Brazil had reduced the magnitude or
significance of EU-US economic ties; in fact, as recent works (1) clearly demonstrate, the opposite is true:

(a)

(b)

trade between the two great markets has reached unprecedented levels, with trade exchanges alone
being worth EUR 1 billion a day;

trade in services has continued to grow significantly with the EU exporting almost EUR 120 billion to
the US, which accounts for a third of total extra-EU trade in services and translates into a surplus of
EUR 15 billion in trade in services with the US;

(c) mutual foreign direct investment (the deepest form of cross-border integration) across the Atlantic now

amounts to over EUR 1,5 trillion and has grown considerably;

(d) European and US foreign affiliates' profits in each others' markets have surged to record figures since

2003;

2.
Stresses in this respect that such EU-US economic ties translate into a substantial volume of employ-
ment, since close to 7 million jobs on either side are already provided by the transatlantic economy and
therefore remain dependent on its functioning and expansion;

(1) Daniel S. HAMILTON/Joseph P. QUINLAN (eds.) Deep Integration: How Transatlantic Markets are Leading Global-
ization. June 2005; Francisco CABRILLO, Jaime GARCÍA-LEGAZ and Pedro SCHWARTZ, A case for an open Atlantic
Prosperity Area, FAES, 2006.

C 298 E/238

Thursday 1 June 2006

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

8.12.2006

3.
Notes that, although the EU and the US economies have become so intertwined and integrated that
they form a genuine transatlantic market, a large potential for growth and employment still lies untapped
due to remaining trade barriers;

4.
States that the EU-US relationship is overshadowed to a considerable extent by political conflict and is
quite often characterised by rhetoric and trade disputes; notes that on both sides of the Atlantic there is a
neglect of how deep and integrated the transatlantic economy has become; warns therefore against the risks
inherent in taking this unique relationship for granted, treating it with benign neglect rather than with the
degree of political engagement and attention required;

Fears that the current framework for the transatlantic relationship does not adequately reflect the
5.
above-mentioned reality; therefore calls for a more visionary and strategic approach to respond properly
to the pressing economic issues affecting the EU and the US economies, such as competition policies,
standardised corporate governance, compatible or common standards and more effective regulatory coop-
eration;

The way ahead: a stronger transatlantic economic partnership

6.
Notes that the above-mentioned Commission Communication of 18 May 2005 is a good basis for
substantially strengthening transatlantic economic relations; stresses that further work is needed to translate
the reality of the transatlantic market into an operational and strategic concept that can gather sufficient
public and political support;

Recommends that by the next 2006 summit, the EU and the US agree to both update the New Trans-
7.
atlantic Agenda (NTA) of 1995 and the Transatlantic Economic Partnership (TEP) of 1998 and draw up a
new transatlantic partnership agreement that covers both and leads to the achievement of a ‘barrier-free
transatlantic market’ by 2015 with a 2010 accelerated target date for financial services and capital markets;
this initiative should be based on the Economic Initiative adopted at the June 2005 EU-US Summit and the
Joint EU-US Work Programme, setting specific sector-by-sector objectives with a view to taking stock of the
progress achieved in 2005-2006 and specifying future steps to be taken;

Stresses that the economic chapter of the proposed partnership agreement should provide for a new
8.
architecture that includes: regulatory co-operation; a set of operational tools of an horizontal character
(including an effective early warning system and a third-generation agreement on the application of com-
petition law); sectoral economic co-operation agreements building on the above-mentioned Joint EU-US
Work Programme;

9.
Emphasises that the strengthening of transatlantic economic cooperation should not lead to downward
harmonization in the regulatory field that would erode consumer confidence with regard to health and
safety; therefore urges that the Transatlantic Consumer Dialogue and the Transatlantic Environmental Dia-
logue be revitalized to develop ‘best practices’ to advance consumer health, safety and environmental pro-
tection, thus facilitating a more sustainable transatlantic marketplace;

Reaffirms that, in the current environment of growing international competitive pressures, the vision
10.
of such a common economic area is essential to increase the political commitment to a more substantial
economic agenda that enhances the competitive position of the knowledge-based economies of both part-
ners; promotes growth and innovation and thereby creates new jobs and increases prosperity;

11.
Notes that a fragmented international regulatory environment hampers the potential for growth in
international trade and stresses that closer regulatory cooperation between the EU and the US is essential to
advance towards a more harmonised regulatory environment whereby economic operators from all coun-
tries in general and developing countries in particular can operate with lower costs and greater freedom;

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298 E/239

Thursday 1 June 2006

12.
Points out that the positive state of the US and EU economies and the strengthening of their econ-
omic relations, in particular through institutionalised instruments, are contributing in no small way, through
the weight of the two areas in question, to the growth and development of the whole world economy;

13.
Calls on the transatlantic partnership, which accounts for roughly 57 % of world gross domestic
product and remains the twin engine of the world economy, to exercise global leadership in a context
marked by growing inter-dependence, the emergence of new economic powers and an increasing number
of global challenges that cut across national boundaries; recommends in this respect more in-depth and
systematic consultations on common economic issues with other major economic players (including India,
Japan, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, Chile, Russia and China);

Considers that, in the interests of the international economy as a whole, apart from these specific
14.
economic areas, for the purpose of greater security and stability of trade, there is a need to seek appropriate
and closer forms of better coordination regarding monetary fluctuations;

Doha Development Agenda

Stresses that both the EU and the US carry a special responsibility and share common objectives, and
15.
consequently have every interest in working constructively together in the ongoing WTO multilateral
negotiations; calls upon both partners to respect the ambitious and broad based programme of the Doha
Development Agenda with full regard for the development dimension so as to pave the way for a successful
completion of the Doha Round in 2006;

16.
Urges the EU and the US to remain fully committed to the WTO multilateral negotiations and not to
engage in competition for bilateral or regional trade agreements; reiterates its call for the Commission not to
decide on the desirability or feasibility of possible new bilateral or regional trade agreements without engag-
ing in prior meaningful consultations with the Parliament;

Hopes that there will be a substantial reduction in EU and US tariffs peaks and other significant

17.
tariffs regardless of whether the Doha Round is successfully concluded;

18. Welcomes the agreement within the WTO framework on the definitive elimination of all forms of
agricultural export subsidies, including those in the form of food aid and other export refund systems, by
2013 and stresses that comparable progress has yet to be achieved in the areas of domestic support and
market access;

19.
Calls on the US to remove customs impediments such as custom user fees and excessive invoicing
requirements on importers; regrets the US Bureau of Customs and Border Protection's lack of recognition of
the EU as a Customs Union and as a ‘country-of-origin’; calls on the US Government to reverse its negative
stance towards EU membership of the World Customs Organization (WCO);

Follow-up to the Economic Initiative and the EU-US informal Economic Ministerial Meeting of 30 Nov-
ember 2005

20.
Supports the adoption at the EU-US Economic Ministerial Meeting of the joint EU-US Work Pro-
gramme for the implementation of the Economic Declaration, which contains concrete activities in eleven
areas to move forward transatlantic economic integration; calls, however, on both partners to engage in
genuine implementation and deepening of this joint Work Programme with a greater and more ambitious
sense of direction, long- term strategic objectives and a detailed timetable for the implementation of joint
actions and projects that takes into account the specific role of independent regulatory agencies; notes in
this respect that stakeholders from the already established transatlantic dialogues,
including consumer
groups, unions and environmental groups, should be more actively involved in the process of monitoring
and reviewing the Economic Initiative and Work Programme;

C 298 E/240

Thursday 1 June 2006

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

8.12.2006

21.
Takes the view that the economic chapter of the proposed partnership agreement should provide, in
line with the Economic Initiative, specific ideas for the removal of non-tariff barriers in key market sectors
through a process of gradual regulatory alignment and mutual recognition of rules and standards;

Promoting regulatory and standards cooperation

22. Welcomes the fact that the commitment to ‘establish a high-level Regulatory Cooperation Forum’,
a key element of the June 2005 Summit Declaration, has finally been set in motion with the proposal to
organise at least two meetings in 2006; recommends a swift and full implementation of the 2005 Roadmap
for EU-US Regulatory Co-operation; warns that without a sufficient and timely involvement and the support
of the various stakeholders and agencies, regulatory cooperation will not achieve the expected results;

23.
Reiterates that a considerable number of obstacles to trade and investment still need to be tackled in
both the EU and the US and notes with concern the increasing pressures to respond to foreign competition
by means of protectionist or unfair trade measures; stresses that a renewed commitment to the principles of
openness, transparency and the rule of law reflected in the Economic Initiative and the proposed new
Transatlantic Partnership Agreement should help eliminate most of these problems;

24.
Stresses that regulatory barriers have become one of the most significant obstacles to trade and
investment between the EU and the US and warns, in particular, against the proliferation of unjustified
additional regulations at State level, the non-use of relevant international standards as the basis for technical
regulationsand the practice of excessive reliance on third-party certification in the US;

Expresses its concern about the lack of a clear definition of ‘national security’ in the US and its
25.
excessive use as a restriction on trade and investment; regrets in particular the so-called ‘Berry Amendment’
used by the Defense Department and the 1988 ‘Exon-Florio Amendment’ and subsequent legislation to limit
foreign investment in, or ownership of, businesses relating even tangentially to national security;

Notes that differences in court rules and the practice of recognising court judgments within EU
26.
countries and among US States has a significant impact on legal disputes concerning transatlantic trans-
actions; asks the EU and the US to examine the feasibility of an agreement on jurisdiction, recognition and
enforcement of court judgments related to civil and commercial matters;

27.
Notes that the transatlantic telecommunication market is still hampered by regulatory barriers and
incompatible standards which translate into a situation whereby, despite the fact that nine out of the ten
biggest telecom companies in the world are based in the EU or the US, no US or European company is
operating on both continents to any significant extent;

Stimulating open and competitive capital markets

28.
Calls for the mutual recognition of accounting standards followed by their progressive convergence,
based on reliable regulatory supervision, so that companies can use a single standard in both markets and in
order to reduce listing costs; asks the Commission, however, to monitor closely the full equivalence road-
map of the International Accounting Standards Board/Financial Accounting Standards Board, to avoid any
pro-US bias;

29.
Calls for the enhancement of the Financial Markets Regulatory Dialogue via a bi-annual policy review
of transatlantic financial services matters between the European Parliament, the Commission, the relevant
US authorities, and the economic committees of the US Congress, to take place before and after every
annual EU-US summit; commends the work done so far by industry members such as the Futures and
Options Association;

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298 E/241

Thursday 1 June 2006

30.
Strongly rejects the US postponement of the implementation of the Basel II Accord on Capital
Requirements and calls on the US to honour its commitments in order to create a world-wide level playing
field for banks; believes that diverging approaches might hamper EU banks with US operations from setting
up integrated-risk management systems;

31.
Expresses dissatisfaction at the need for EU reinsurers in the US to fully collateralise risks, facing
highly discriminatory State rules, which require them to overfund their liabilities by maintaining excessive
levels of collateral (US accredited reinsurers operating in the US are subject to no such collateralisation
requirements); calls on the competent US authorities to strive for further transatlantic mutual recognition
and uniform solvency and reporting requirements;

Insists on the rapid convergence of de-listing rules in US stock markets, which currently impose
32.
onerous requirements on EU firms wishing to de-list; welcomes the recent US Securities Exchange Commis-
sion's proposal to consider trading volumes and not the number of shareholders as the main criterion; and
asks the Commission to monitor these new developments to safeguard EU interests;

33.
Believes in a more coherent corporate governance dialogue, and in the harmonisation of demands
concerning corporate governance and supervision, avoiding extra-territoriality incidents such as ‘Sarbanes-
Oxley’, for instance by improving the Transatlantic Corporate Governance Dialogue; calls for closer joint EU-
US scrutiny of global hedge funds;

Requests a Commission update on the application of the EU Savings Tax Directive as regards the

34.
USA;

Money laundering and terrorist financing cooperation

35.
Notes that open markets are highly dependent on secure and reliable structures and that trust and
confidence are vital to global trade relations; expresses its support for close EU-US collaboration to continue
fighting corporate and financial fraud, money laundering and terrorist financing, while avoiding unnecessary
disruption to normal commercial and private transactions;

Spurring innovation and the development of technology

36. Welcomes the aim to increase synergies across the Atlantic in a large number of crucial areas for the
development of stronger knowledge-based economies;

Encourages the establishment of transatlantic research partnerships involving SMEs in joint research

37.
projects, and the adoption of measures to encourage the return of European researchers to Europe;

Points out that it is beneficial to both sides to promote co-operation in research and development

38.
and to pursue investment programmes, in, for example, the following fields:

(a)

technologies for high-speed ground transport and in particular new types of highly efficient mass
transit systems for urban development;

(b)

the development of synthetic fuels and electric propulsion mechanisms for automobiles, trucks and
buses, and the utilization of fuel cells and so on;

(c)

the development of new technologies for the reduction of emissions of greenhouse gases;

C 298 E/242

Thursday 1 June 2006

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

8.12.2006

39.
Reminds, in this respect, Member States and the US of the commitment expressed by both sides in
the Joint Declaration of 2003 on the promotion of the hydrogen economy and welcomes the progress
made, but considers however that further collaboration is required;

Considers that information and communication technologies (ICT) are highly relevant for both econ-

40.
omies; therefore recommends a series of joint measures in order to:

(a)

encourage the deployment of key technologies such as broadband, radiofrequency identification devices
and other innovative technologies, taking into account interoperability;

(b)

secure networks and facilitate the flow of information while paying special attention to spam;

(c)

ensure close cooperation between ‘cyber-security’ agencies;

(d) address the high cost of roaming;

Believes that the seventh Framework Programme on Research and Development will present a unique

41.
opportunity for common action in:

(a)

(b)

(c)

identifying priority areas of research collaboration in order to develop new transatlantic markets (e.g.
hydrogen fuel cell technologies and nanotechnology);

joint research in areas relevant to civil security and in the area of reliability of complex networked
systems and the informational infrastructures underpinning information society technologies;

encouraging strong co-operation between the European Research Council
Science Foundation (NSF);

(ERC) and the National

Considers that new and existing space programmes offer to a certain degree an opportunity for joint

42.
undertakings in the exploration of outer space, by:

(a) promoting co-operation in key areas such as earth observation, satellite navigation (as provided for by

Galileo and GPS), electronic communication, space science and exploration;

(b) addressing regulatory barriers to the creation of a well-functioning transatlantic market for the space

industry;

(c)

removing unnecessary controls under the US International Traffic in Arms Regulations and liberalising
the international launcher market;

Asks the Commission to suggest a joint malaria research programme in addition to already existing

43.
joint research on pandemic diseases;

Supports actions to enhance entrepreneurship and risk-taking in the EU, based on appropriate

44.
examples of US strengths in this area;

Enhancing Trade, Travel and Security

45.
Notes that visa policy is now a policy of exclusive Community competence; asks the Commission to
begin negotiations with the US Administration without delay in order to make the Visa Waiver Program
valid for all European citizens and to remove current discrimination, in particular against the citizens of the
new Member States;

Stresses that the cumbersome procedures for the acquisition of visas has translated into increased
initiative, which should be based on

46.
costs for companies and citizens; welcomes the ‘Trusted Person’
mutually developed standards, as a means to facilitate travel for business or tourist purposes;

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298 E/243

Thursday 1 June 2006

47.
Regrets that most EU citizens are still subject to strict visa controls, which acts as a brake on the free
movement and exchange of workers and all those who have to travel to or stay in the US on business; calls
on the US to show more flexibility in this regard, particularly for European citizens who travel regularly to
the US on business;

Promoting Energy Efficiency

48.
Recommends, given that energy policy is essential for economic development and cannot be separ-
ated from crucial geopolitical issues and foreign policy, that a more frank and open exchange be held on
ways to increase openness in world energy commerce, promote renewable energy worldwide, develop closer
cooperation with supplying partners and define a common energy security strategy and other policies to
encourage geopolitical and economic stability in supplier and transit nations;

49.
Regrets that only the EU is taking the lead on international climate policy, that the US is the world's
largest emitter of greenhouse gases and that there is accordingly still a need to urge it, at all policy levels, to
assume its responsibilities in terms of climate change; regrets therefore that the US Administration remains
so reluctant to enter into any meaningful international partnership on climate change, but notes that it has
taken a modest step forward, inasmuch as it is now willing, as agreed at the December 2005 Montreal
Conference of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, to engage in a thorough
forward-looking dialogue; welcomes the fact that an emerging coalition of interests in the US, including
Members of Congress from both Houses and both parties, State legislators, local authorities, NGOs and
representatives of the business community, is pushing for a more ambitious agenda to tackle greenhouse
gas emissions;

Considers that the energy sector presents common challenges to both the EU and US and that
50.
although significant measures have been taken separately on both sides, the sector requires a mutually
beneficial approach that seeks to:

(a) devise a common strategy addressing the high dependence on fossil energy sources via the implemen-
tation of concrete measures regarding energy efficiency, renewable energies and security of supply, both
in terms of energy and also in the transport sector;

(b) develop clean Combined Heat and Power (CHP) and renewable technologies (e.g. carbon capture and

storage and other low carbon technologies);

(c)

after the Kyoto Protocol expires, encourage the US and economically-emerging, newly-industrialised
countries such as China and India to develop, jointly with the EU, measures to achieve long-term and
economically sustainable emissions reduction and to respond appropriately, taking account of cost and
environmental issues, to the damage already caused by climate change;

(d)

recognise the important role which nuclear power plays in providing carbon-free power and continue
joint research into the development of this vital technology and ways in which it can facilitate the
hydrogen economy;

(e) develop — together with the International Atomic Energy Agency — a common proposal for a multi-
lateral framework for a global nuclear policy which enhances the security and prevents the misuse of
nuclear material for military purposes;

(f)

subsequently develop a common strategy, in relation both to other countries with large or fast-growing
energy needs and to the producer countries;

51.
Underlines the need for enhanced EU-US scientific cooperation on biofuels and recommends that the
initiative for a joint EU-US biofuels work programme that focuses specifically on second generation bioe-
thanol and biodiesel be implemented as soon as possible;

C 298 E/244

Thursday 1 June 2006

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

8.12.2006

Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)

52. Welcomes the agreement at the EU-US Economic Ministerial Meeting to produce by the 2006 EU-US
Summit an IPR enforcement cooperation strategy that will tackle IPR abuse and the lack of effective enforce-
ment in third countries, China and Russia in particular, and that will improve customs and border enforce-
ment cooperation, encourage public-private partnerships and coordinate technical assistance to third coun-
tries;

53.
Regrets the lack of a common understanding on geographical indications; regrets that the co-exist-
ence of fundamentally different patent systems (the US with its ‘first-to-invent’ system whilst the ‘first-to-file’
system is followed by the rest of the world) continues to create considerable problems for EU companies;
encourages the US Congress to pursue the reform of the patent system by moving toward a ‘first-to-file’
system;

Encourages the EU and US to work together using appropriate channels to combat the abuse of IPR

54.
in third countries, in particular China and Russia;

Investment

55.
Recommends that the 2006 Summit formally adopt a comprehensive inventory identifying the main
remaining obstacles to mutual investment together with a list of the required specific actions to reduce or
eliminate such obstacles in full coherence with the rules of the internal market, including the provisions
related to public services and the precautionary principle;

56.
Supports investment facilitation measures and the progressive removal of all transatlantic investment
barriers through: the convergence of accounting standards; a level playing field in financial markets; a
mutually fair competition policy; and the phasing out of the protectionist measures still present in certain
sectors; questions the remaining ownership restrictions in the US, particularly in the defence and aviation
sectors and supports the reform of the US Committee on Foreign Investments; calls for a Commission study
to be undertaken into the barriers to takeovers in the internal market, which disadvantage EU versus US
purchasers; calls on the Commission to ensure that proprietary restrictions in the EU cannot be used as an
argument for upholding US restrictions;

Competition policy and enforcement

57.
Requests the creation of a joint transatlantic framework on competition policy, which increases the
co-ordination of enforcement activities and facilitates confidential information exchanges; insists that the
equal application of competition rules on both sides of the Atlantic, regardless of country of establishment,
is of the essence in order to create a competitive and unified transatlantic market;

Supports the objective of concluding a further competition agreement with the US which allows for

58.
the exchange of confidential information in investigations under EU and US competition laws;

Procurement

Recommends that the 2006 Summit formally adopt a comprehensive inventory of any legal, practical
59.
and technical barriers to cross-border procurement between both partners, together with a list of measures
to address them; that takes into account the particular case of services of general interest; encourages both
partners to go beyond existing and future GPA-commitments, thus making it possible, on the one hand, to
widen the field of opportunities for both parties and, on the other, to boost European competitiveness and
create new markets for EU businesses, particularly SMEs;

60.
Supports a strengthening of cooperation between the EU and the USA concerning the opening of the
public procurements market; stresses that the adoption of equal conditions of competition in this sector will
create new opportunities for EU undertakings and especially SMEs;

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298 E/245

Thursday 1 June 2006

Regrets the fact that the US maintains a wide variety of discriminatory ‘Buy America’ provisions to
61.
which others are also being added; more specifically, regrets that it is still difficult for European defence
firms to do business in the US defence market and to acquire US defence-related technology, due to the
absence of a genuine transatlantic ‘two-way street’ in defence procurement and in the defence sector more
generally; asks the US Congress to accept the reality of the transatlantic economy, even in security-related
markets;

Services/ Mutual Recognition of qualifications

Notes that only the guild of architects has encouraged the competent authorities on both sides to
62.
look into the mutual recognition of qualifications as part of the Work Programme; acknowledges that other
professions seem to prefer to handle recognition procedures amongst partner associations in the EU and the
US; asks the Commission to report to the relevant Committees of the European Parliament about existing
barriers to mutual recognition of qualifications on both sides;

63.
Notes that large differences still exist between the States of the US as regards the horizontal recog-
nition of diplomas and professional qualifications, which discourages further development in the transatlan-
tic market, particularly in the services sector; urges the Commission to initiate negotiations in specific
sectors, such as pilot licences, with a view to the conclusion of agreements; and urges the US to develop a
system based on the European model whereby nearly all diplomas and professional qualifications are
mutually recognised among States as it is the case within the EU's internal market;

Services/Air Transport Services

64. Welcomes recent progress in the negotiations for the liberalisation of EU-US air services and stresses
the need to reach, as soon as possible, a full agreement based on reciprocity that solves the issue of owner-
ship caps in US airlines;

65. Maintains that, since trade and tourism are vital to both sides, the Transatlantic Partnership Agree-
ment to be concluded in 2007 must, without fail, include a separate chapter on transport policy supple-
mented by summits, meetings between the members of the US Congressional and European Parliamentary
committees responsible for transport, meetings between the US Transportation Secretary and the competent
EU Commissioner, and Commission officials, along with cooperation between agencies responsible for air
safety and the appropriate bodies of the federal administration;

WTO Dispute Settlement EU/US

Insists that although WTO panels can provoke considerable political friction, trade or economic

66.
disputes are a natural component of the transatlantic economic relationship;

Recommends a common strategy based on three points to reduce the number of disputes between

67.
the largest world trading powers that spill over onto the wider WTO arena:

(a)

a formal commitment at the highest level to respect agreed multilateral trade rules and to implement
swiftly and fully WTO panel decisions;

(b) enhanced political commitment to exhaust all bilateral diplomatic means before appealing to the WTO
dispute settlement mechanism, taking into account the need to protect the legitimate interest of oper-
ators and traders;

C 298 E/246

Thursday 1 June 2006

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

8.12.2006

(c) both partners must recognise that legislators and governments have a legitimate right to protect the
health and environment of their citizens, but the EU and the US must ensure that their regulations in
these fields are non-discriminatory, proportionate and science-based in order to prevent protectionist
abuses while remaining in accordance with internal regulations and the precautionary principle;

68.
Asks the Commission to submit to the European Parliament a report evaluating the advantages and
disadvantages of a more formal bilateral trade dispute settlement mechanism, bearing in mind similar exist-
ing arrangements between the EU and other third countries;

Notes that the methodology used by the US authorities on trade defence-related matters is, in some
69.
instances, an illegitimate trade barrier and stresses that the apparently protectionist application of US trade
defence instruments has already, as in the case of the so-called ‘Byrd Amendment’ or the US steel safeguards,
been challenged successfully — and not only by the EU — within the WTO dispute settlement system;

70. Welcomes the ‘Deficit Reduction Act 2005’ passed by the US Congress, which repeals the ‘Byrd
Amendment’, but regrets that, due to a transition clause, the repeal will not be effective immediately; calls
therefore on the US Congress to urgently remove the transition clause so that the distribution of collected
anti-dumping and anti-subsidy duties to US companies does not continue to distort the conditions of com-
petition on the US market at the expense of imported goods for a number of years;

71.
Reiterates its concern about the significant direct and indirect government support given to US
industry, by means of direct subsidies, protective legislation and tax policies; stresses, in particular, that all
the reports by the WTO Panel and the Appellate Body on the Foreign Sales Corporations (FSC) scheme have
concluded that, despite some major changes to its legislation, the US has yet to fully abide by previous
WTO rulings and the recommendations of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body (DSB); calls therefore on
the US Congress to bring the American Jobs Creation Act (Jobs Act), which contains a ‘Grandfathering
Clause’, into full compliance with previous WTO rulings and DSB recommendations;

72. Welcomes the fact that the long-standing ‘Foreign Sales Corporations (FSC)’ dispute has come to an
end with the repeal by the US Congress of the WTO-incompatible corporate tax breaks for US companies
contained in the American Jobs Creation Act;

73.
Regrets, with regard to the Airbus-Boeing case, that the US and the EU are unnecessarily engaged in
probably the biggest, most complicated and costly legal dispute in the WTO's history; calls on both parties
to increase consultations at the highest level in order to explore ways of reaching a pragmatic solution that
avoids unnecessary recourse to the WTO;

Stresses that the WTO case on GMOs does not in any way call into question European legislation on
74.
the market authorisation of biotech products, but concerns outdated biotech assessment procedures that
have already been revised since the initiation of the Panel proceedings;

75. Welcomes the EU decision to comply with the WTO ruling by modifying its legislation on hormones
as of 2003; wishes that the persistent disagreement between the US (and Canada) and the EU on the
continued application of counter-measures be resolved and urges the US to lift the trade sanctions that it
has applied since 1999 against European products;

Regrets that the US has not yet abandoned its anti-dumping methodology known as ‘zeroing’, despite

76.
the fact that the WTO unambiguously condemned this practice in the bed linen case;

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298 E/247

Thursday 1 June 2006

77.
Emphasises that the WTO dispute settlement system is a central element in providing security and
predictability to the multilateral trading system; expresses its concern that in some cases the US has adopted
an approach inconsistent with its international obligations by applying or refusing to repeal laws which are
in breach of WTO obligations and result in serious damage to the EU and third countries' industries; calls,
therefore, on the US Congress to improve its record of compliance with WTO dispute settlement findings;

Other global issues

78.
Regrets that co-operation on monetary and macroeconomic policy issues is not included in the
Economic Initiative and Work Programme; reiterates its concern about the potentially dangerous impact of
the large dual US federal budget and current account deficit on the global economy; calls therefore upon the
European Central Bank and the Federal Reserve to co-operate more closely on global monetary policy and
financial stability issues;

Reiterates its call for the transatlantic partners to jointly re-assess their development aid and humani-
79.
tarian assistance strategies and instruments, including their co-ordination with the Bretton Woods institu-
tions, so as to improve the effectiveness, coherence and complementarity of the EU and US response to
global challenges, notably poverty reduction, communicable diseases and degradation of the environment;

Asks the Commission to evaluate the existing funding and programming mechanisms to finance EU-
80.
US joint programmes in third countries with a view to creating a more efficient and productive procedure;

Considers that the ‘cultural key’ can help to enhance transatlantic relations and thus serve to foster

81.
partnership and mutual comprehension between Europeans and Americans;

Calls on the EU and US to take account, in their economic relations, of the role and special features

82.
of the culture and education sectors;

83.
Calls, therefore, for the establishment of a transatlantic dialogue on the subject of culture (including
the audiovisual sector) and education which will encourage regular exchanges of good practice and past
experience, particularly with regard to:

(a)

action to combat piracy and counterfeiting,

(b)

(c)

introducing better legal methods of distributing audio and audiovisual content over the Internet and
ensuring their compatibility with copyright and authors' rights and remuneration,

awareness of the US and EU cinematic heritage — especially awareness of European films in America,
where they are less widely shown — as a means of promoting mutual understanding;

(d) measures to promote more balanced film distribution and prevent unfair competition or abuse of a
dominant market position in certain markets within the EU together with the removal of any ‘de jure’
or ‘de facto’ barriers to the distribution of European audiovisual material in the US;

(e)

the establishment of suitable mechanisms to develop and strengthen cultural tourism between the two
continents;

84. With regard to education, calls for the dialogue to focus, in particular, on:

(a)

enhancing mutual recognition of professional qualifications, particularly in the arts disciplines, with a
view to facilitating the mobility of ‘cultural players’ and exchanges of artists and performers,

(b) promoting research and exchanges by university teachers, research staff and students in fields which
help to consolidate economic and scientific relations between the EU and the US, bearing in mind in
particular their cooperation programme in higher education and vocational education and training (1);

(c)

awareness of the importance of a knowledge-based society and the consolidation of life-long learning;

(1) OJ L71 of 13.3.2001, p. 8.

C 298 E/248

Thursday 1 June 2006

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

8.12.2006

85. Mindful of Articles 133 and 151 of the EC Treaty, considers that the special nature of the audiovisual
sector makes it essential for transatlantic exchanges to take place on the basis of respect for the EU's cultural
and linguistic diversity: calls, in this regard, for the implementation of suitable measures to promote cultural
diversity and step up cultural exchanges;

86.
Calls on the European institutions to raise the awareness of their US partners regarding measures by
the EU in support of the Unesco Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural
Expressions;

87.
Stresses the importance of focusing on data protection issues in the context of transatlantic relations;
notes, in view of the lack of data protection in transatlantic exchanges in certain respects, that it is appropri-
ate to evaluate those areas in which the exchange of information with third countries appears to work well
(such as the Safe Harbour Privacy Principles) in order to disseminate successful solutions to more areas;

88. Welcomes the recent study conducted by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Devel-
opment (OECD) into the macroeconomic benefits of promoting further economic integration between the
EU and the US, estimating the gains in GDP per capita of significant reductions in the barriers to market
access, foreign direct investment and trade in the EU and the US at 2 to 3,5 per cent and 1 to 3 per cent
respectively;

89.
Requests that the EU carry out a more detailed and comprehensive study that: (a) identifies the
consequences of removing remaining tariff and non-tariff barriers to trade and investment between the EU
and the US;(b) examines across the board the potential for, as appropriate, ex ante or ex post regulatory
alignment;(c) evaluates the impact of EU-US regulatory alignment or convergence on third countries;(d)
examines the feasibility of a ‘regulatory bridge’ according to which once a good or service is approved, it
becomes acceptable everywhere in the transatlantic market;

Transatlantic dialogues

90.
Stresses the importance of the transatlantic dialogues in fostering ties between the EU and the US;
notes that by working on major issues within their respective areas, and making valuable contributions to
the shaping of the transatlantic relationship, its objectives and activities, the dialogues are closely involved in
transatlantic decision-making and help to ensure that efforts in the various fields are genuinely responsive to
the real needs of citizens;

Notes that the Transatlantic Legislators Dialogue (TLD) has helped to strengthen interparliamentary
91.
relations between the EU and the US; reiterates the need to build synergies between the TLD and the other
NTA dialogues, inter alia by launching new jointly-funded programmes for exchanges between legislative
staffers and by creating a small TLD secretariat;

Stresses that

the 61st Meeting of

92.
the Transatlantic Legislators' Dialogue, held in Vienna on
18-21 April 2006, reaffirmed the enormous advantages for our constituents that could result from the
removal of barriers impeding transatlantic economic relations and noted that the relationship between the
United States and the European Union should be renewed by replacing its current structure with an EU/US
Partnership Agreement;

Takes note of the fact that the Transatlantic Business Dialogue (TABD) has successfully reshaped its

93.
format to provide more efficient business input with a view to strengthening the economic partnership;

94.
Stresses that both sides of the Transatlantic Labour Dialogue should become more proactive and
visible in shaping responses and recommendations on common issues; recommends that the Transatlantic
Labour Dialogue focus on critical areas of cooperation through a more sector-oriented approach;

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298 E/249

Thursday 1 June 2006

95.
Notes that the EU-US Science and Technology Agreement is a key instrument for advancing EU-US
scientific relations; calls for the creation of an official transatlantic research dialogue to promote and coor-
dinate research collaboration and new initiatives in selected scientific fields that go beyond existing struc-
tures;

96.
Notes that other transatlantic dialogues existing outside the official agreements also contribute to
foster ties between the EU and the US; recommends that the current structure of the transatlantic dialogues
be reviewed and new promising areas for enhanced cooperation be explored;

The Role of the European Parliament

97.
Stresses that while the tasks mapped out in the Economic Initiative concern the regulators first and
foremost, in order to achieve an integrated transatlantic market, the active involvement of the legislatures on
both sides is also desirable; stresses that EU-US Summits should incorporate an adequate level of parlia-
mentary participation to provide parliamentary input into this administrative process led by the two execu-
tives; calls for a meeting prior to every summit between the TLD and the Senior-Level Group to exchange
views on the progress of the Work Programme;

Calls for a meeting prior to every summit between the TLD and the Senior-Level Group to exchange

98.
views on relevant economic issues and in particular on the progress of the Work Programme;

Recommends that at least the President of the European Parliament and US Congressional leaders
99.
participate in the next EU-US summit and, as a general rule, that the European Parliament and the US
Congress be associated with the preparation and actual holding of all future EU-US summit meetings;

100. Welcomes efforts aimed at strengthening the Transatlantic Legislators' Dialogue (TLD) between the
European Parliament and the US Congress including, in particular, the implementation of an effective ‘early
warning’ mechanism and a reporting system between parliamentary committees on both sides of the Atlan-
tic;

Asks the House of Representatives to consider setting up a permanent delegation in order to ensure
101.
continuity to the TLD; furthermore, a regular dialogue should also be instituted between the European
Parliament and the US Senate;

102.
Calls on its relevant committee to use the budget for 2007 to provide the necessary funds for
establishing a permanent European Parliament official post in Washington DC that ensures proper institu-
tionalisation of Parliament's own activities and allows for improved liaison between the EP and the US
Congress;

*

*

*

103.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and the Commission, the govern-
ments and parliaments of the Member States and the President and Congress of the United States of
America.

P6_TA(2006)0240

Enlargement of the euro zone

European Parliament resolution on the enlargement of the euro zone (2006/2103(INI))

The European Parliament,

— having regard to Article 121 of the EC Treaty,

— having regard to the Commission communication on public finances in EMU — 2005 (COM(2005)

0231),