do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-176/04: Order of the Court of First Instance of  6 March 2006  — Marcuccio v Commission (Officials — Social security benefits — Access to information about the existence of a medical report — Transmission after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2006-05-20
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, European official, access to information, action for annulment (EU), medical data

C 121/12

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

20.5.2006

Order of the Court of First Instance of 6 March 2006 —
Marcuccio v Commission

Order of the Court of First Instance of 22 March 2006 —
Strack v Commission

(Case T-176/04) (1)

(Case T-4/05) (1)

(Officials — Social security benefits — Access to informa-
tion about the existence of a medical report — Transmission
after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate)

(Officials — Official informing OLAF of possible irregulari-
ties — Decision of OLAF to close the investigation — Act
adversely affecting an official — Standing to bring proceed-
ings — Inadmissibility)

(2006/C 121/20)

Language of the case: Italian

(2006/C 121/21)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: A.
Distante, lawyer)

Parties

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: J. Currall and C. Berardis-Kayser, acting as Agents,
assisted by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Applicant: Guido Strack (Wasserliesch, Germany) (represented
by: R. Schmitt, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: C. Ladenburger and H. Kraemer, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for, in the first place, annulment of the Commis-
sion's implied decision rejecting the applicant's request to be
sent a medical report or the written confirmation that that
report does not exist; in the second place, annulment of the
Commission's implied decision rejecting the complaint made
about the rejection of that request and, in the third place, a
declaration of the applicant's right to have the claims in his
request and in his complaint granted.

Re:

First, an application for annulment of the decision of the Euro-
pean Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) of 5 February 2004 to close the
investigation number OF/2002/0356 and the final case report
on which that decision was based dated 5 February 2004 and,
secondly, an application to reopen that investigation and to
draw up a new final case report.

Operative part of the order

1. There is no further need to adjudicate on the action.

Operative part of the order

2. The Commission is to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred
by the applicant before the notification of the defence. The appli-
cant is to bear his own costs incurred after the notification of the
defence.

1. The application is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 179, 10.7.2004.

(1) OJ C 57, 5.3.2005.
Case T -56/03: Order of the Court of First Instance of  15 March 2006  — Bioelettrica v Commission
Date: 2006-05-20
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, appeal to the Court (EU), building industry, energy industry, termination of a contract

C 121/18

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

20.5.2006

Order of the Court of First Instance of 20 March 2006 —
Bioelettrica v Commission

Order of the Court of First Instance of 21 March 2006 —
Holcim (France) v Commission

(Case T -287/01) (1)

(2006/C 121/32)

Language of the case: Italian

(Case T -86/03) (1)

(2006/C 121/34)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case
be removed from the register.

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case
be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 31, 2.2.2002.

(1) OJ C 112, 10.5.2003.

Order of the Court of First Instance of 15 March 2006 —
Bioelettrica v Commission

(Case T -56/03) (1)

(2006/C 121/33)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be
removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 101, 26.4.2003.

Order of the Court of First Instance of 21 March 2006 —
Colgate-Palmolive v OHIM

(Case T-322/04) (1)

(2006/C 121/35)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case
be removed from the register.

(1) OJ C 262, 23.10.2004.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2006-05-20
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate

20.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 120/1

I

(Information)

COMMISSION

Euro exchange rates (1)

19 May 2006

(2006/C 120/01)

1 euro =

Currency

Exchange rate

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

JPY

DKK

GBP

SEK

CHF

ISK

NOK

BGN

CYP

CZK

EEK

HUF

LTL

LVL

MTL

PLN

US dollar

Japanese yen

Danish krone

Pound sterling

Swedish krona

Swiss franc

Iceland króna

Norwegian krone

Bulgarian lev

Cyprus pound

Czech koruna

Estonian kroon

Hungarian forint

Lithuanian litas

Latvian lats

Maltese lira

Polish zloty

RON

Romanian leu

1,2767

142,64

7,4553

0,6801

9,3705

1,5561

91,15

7,805

1,9558

0,575

28,288

15,6466

263,65

3,4528

0,6961

0,4293

3,9422

3,5215

SIT

SKK

TRY

Slovenian tolar

Slovak koruna

Turkish lira

AUD Australian dollar

CAD

HKD

Canadian dollar

Hong Kong dollar

NZD New Zealand dollar

SGD

Singapore dollar

239,61

37,673

1,8878

1,6787

1,4321

9,9014

2,0563

2,0264

KRW South Korean won

1 208,08

ZAR

CNY

HRK

IDR

South African rand

Chinese yuan renminbi

Croatian kuna

8,2031

10,2328

7,273

Indonesian rupiah

11 758,41

MYR Malaysian ringgit

PHP

RUB

THB

Philippine peso

Russian rouble

Thai baht

4,6191

67,205

34,527

48,753

(1) Source:

reference exchange rate published by the ECB.