Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of  17 May 2006  on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts, amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC and repealing Council Directive 84/253/EEC   (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2006-05-17
Institutions: Council of the European Union, European Parliament
Subjects: audit, auditing, consolidated account, credit institution, insurance company, investment company

9.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 157/87

DIRECTIVE 2006/43/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

of 17 May 2006

on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts, amending Council Directives 78/
660/EEC and 83/349/EEC and repealing Council Directive 84/253/EEC

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EURO-
PEAN UNION,

(3)

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Com-
munity, and in particular Article 44(2)(g) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and
Social Committee (1),

Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in
Article 251 of the Treaty (2),

Whereas:

(1)

(2)

the

Council

Council

Directive

Currently, the Fourth Council Directive 78/660/EEC of
25 July 1978 on the annual accounts of certain types of
companies (3),
Directive
Seventh
83/349/EEC of 13 June 1983 on consolidated
accounts (4),
of
8 December 1986 on the annual accounts and consoli-
institu-
dated accounts of banks and other financial
tions (5)
of
19 December 1991 on the annual accounts and consoli-
dated accounts of insurance undertakings (6) require that
the annual accounts or consolidated accounts be audited
by one or more persons entitled to carry out such
audits.

Council Directive

91/674/EEC

86/635/EEC

and

The conditions for the approval of persons responsible
for carrying out the statutory audit were laid down in
the Eighth Council Directive 84/253/EEC of 10 April
1984 on the approval of persons
responsible for
carrying out the statutory audits of accounting docu-
ments (7).

(1) OJ C 157, 28.6.2005, p. 115.
(2) Opinion of the European Parliament of 28 September 2005 (not yet
published in the Official Journal) and Council Decision of 25 April
2006.

(3) OJ L 222, 14.8.1978, p. 11. Directive as last amended by Directive
2003/51/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ
L 178, 17.7.2003, p. 16).

(4) OJ L 193, 18.7.1983, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Directive

2003/51/EC.

(5) OJ L 372, 31.12.1986, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Directive

2003/51/EC.

(6) OJ L 374, 31.12.1991, p. 7. Directive as amended by Directive

2003/51/EC.

(7) OJ L 126, 12.5.1984, p. 20.

The lack of a harmonised approach to statutory auditing
in the Community was the reason why the Commission
proposed, in its 1998 Communication on the statutory
audit in the European Union: the way forward (8), the
creation of a Committee on Auditing which could
develop further action in close cooperation with the
accounting profession and Member States.

the work of

On the basis of
that Committee, on
15 November 2000 the Commission issued a Recom-
mendation on quality assurance for the statutory audit
in the European Union: minimum requirements (9) and
on 16 May 2002 a Recommendation on Statutory Audi-
tors' Independence in the EU: A Set of Fundamental Prin-
ciples (10).

This Directive aims at high-level — though not full —
harmonisation of
requirements. A
Member State requiring statutory audit may impose
more stringent requirements, unless otherwise provided
for by this Directive.

statutory

audit

Audit qualifications obtained by statutory auditors on
the basis of this Directive should be considered equiva-
lent.
It should therefore no longer be possible for
Member States to insist that a majority of the voting
rights in an audit firm must be held by locally approved
auditors or that a majority of the members of the admin-
istrative or management body of an audit firm must be
locally approved.

The statutory audit
requires adequate knowledge of
matters such as company law, fiscal law and social law.
Such knowledge should be tested before a statutory
auditor from another Member State can be approved.

In order to protect third parties, all approved auditors
and audit firms should be entered in a register which is
accessible to the public and which contains basic infor-
mation concerning statutory auditors and audit firms.

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

(8) OJ C 143, 8.5.1998, p. 12.
(9) OJ L 91, 31.3.2001, p. 91.
(10) OJ L 191, 19.7.2002, p. 22.

L 157/88

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

9.6.2006

(9)

(10)

(11)

Statutory auditors should adhere to the highest ethical
standards. They should therefore be subject to profes-
sional ethics, covering at least their public-interest func-
tion, their integrity and objectivity and their professional
competence and due care. The public-interest function
of statutory auditors means that a broader community
of people and institutions rely on the quality of a statu-
tory auditor's work. Good audit quality contributes to
the orderly functioning of markets by enhancing the
integrity
statements.
The Commission may adopt implementing measures on
professional ethics as minimum standards. When doing
it might consider the principles contained in the
so,
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) Code of
Ethics.

efficiency

financial

and

of

secrecy which, however,

It is important that statutory auditors and audit firms
respect the privacy of their clients. They should therefore
be bound by strict rules on confidentiality and profes-
sional
impede
proper enforcement of this Directive. Those confidenti-
ality rules should also apply to any statutory auditor or
audit firm which has ceased to be involved in a specific
audit task.

should not

Statutory auditors and audit firms should be independent
when carrying out statutory audits. They may inform the
audited entity of matters arising from the audit, but
should abstain from the internal decision processes of
the audited entity. If they find themselves in a situation
where the significance of the threats to their indepen-
dence, even after application of safeguards to mitigate
those threats, is too high, they should resign or abstain
from the audit engagement. The conclusion that there is
a relationship which compromises the auditor's indepen-
dence may be different as regards
the relationship
between the auditor and the audited entity from that in
respect of the relationship between the network and the
audited entity. Where a cooperative within the meaning
of Article 2(14), or a similar entity as referred to in
Article 45 of Directive 86/635/EEC,
is required or
permitted under national provisions to be a member of
a non-profit-making auditing entity, an objective, reason-
able and informed party would not conclude that the
membership-based relationship compromises the statu-
tory auditor's independence, provided that when such an
auditing entity is conducting a statutory audit of one of
its members, the principles of independence are applied
to the auditors carrying out the audit and those persons
who may be in a position to exert influence on the stat-
utory audit. Examples of threats to the independence of
a statutory auditor or audit firm are a direct or indirect
financial interest in the audited entity and the provision
of additional non-audit services. Also, the level of fees
received from one audited entity and/or the structure of

the fees can threaten the independence of a statutory
auditor or audit firm. Types of safeguards to be applied
to mitigate or eliminate those threats include prohibi-
tions, restrictions, other policies and procedures, and
disclosure. Statutory auditors and audit
firms should
refuse to undertake any additional non-audit service that
compromises their independence. The Commission may
adopt
implementing measures on independence as
minimum standards. In doing so, the Commission might
take into consideration the principles contained in the
abovementioned Recommendation of 16 May 2002. In
order to determine the independence of auditors, the
concept of a ‘network’ in which auditors operate needs
to be clear. In this regard, various circumstances have to
be taken into account, such as instances where a struc-
ture could be defined as a network because it is aimed at
profit- or cost-sharing. The criteria for demonstrating
that there is a network should be judged and weighed
on the basis of all factual circumstances available, such
as whether there are common usual clients.

In cases of self-review or self-interest, where appropriate
to safeguard the statutory auditor's or audit firm's inde-
pendence, it should be for the Member State rather than
the statutory auditor or the audit firm to decide whether
the statutory auditor or audit
firm should resign or
abstain from an audit engagement with regard to its
audit clients. However, this should not lead to a situation
where Member States have a general duty to prevent
statutory auditors or audit firms from providing non-
audit services to their audit clients. For the purposes of
determining whether it is appropriate, in cases of self-
interest or self-review, that a statutory auditor or audit
firm should not carry out statutory audits, so as to safe-
guard the statutory auditor's or audit firm's indepen-
dence,
the factors to be taken into account should
include the question whether or not the audited public-
interest entity has issued transferable securities admitted
to trading on a regulated market within the meaning of
point 14 of Article 4(1) of Directive 2004/39/EC of the
European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April
2004 on markets in financial instruments (1).

international auditing standards. Measures

It is important to ensure consistently high quality in all
statutory audits required by Community law. All statu-
tory audits should therefore be carried out on the basis
of
imple-
menting those standards in the Community should be
adopted in accordance with Council Decision 1999/468/
EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the
exercise of
implementing powers conferred on the
Commission (2). A technical committee or group on
auditing should assist the Commission in the assessment
of
the international
soundness of all
auditing standards, and should also involve the system of

the technical

(12)

(13)

(1) OJ L 145, 30.4.2004, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p. 23.

9.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 157/89

public oversight bodies of the Member States. In order
to achieve
a maximum degree of harmonisation,
Member States should be allowed to impose additional
national audit procedures or requirements only if these
stem from specific national legal requirements relating
to the scope of the statutory audit of annual or consoli-
dated accounts, meaning that those requirements have
not been covered by the adopted international auditing
standards. Member States could maintain those addi-
tional audit procedures until the audit procedures or
subsequently
requirements have been covered by
adopted international auditing standards.
If, however,
the adopted international auditing standards contain
audit procedures the performance of which would create
a specific legal conflict with national law stemming from
specific national requirements related to the scope of the
statutory audit, Member States may carve out
the
conflicting part of the international auditing standard as
long as those conflicts exist, provided the measures
referred to in Article 26(3) are applied. Any addition or
carving out by Member States should add a high level of
credibility to the annual accounts of companies and be
conducive to the public good. The above implies that
Member States may, for example, require an additional
auditor's report to the supervisory board or prescribe
other
requirements based on
reporting and audit
national corporate governance rules.

(14)

an

open

transparent

For the Commission to adopt an international auditing
standard for application in the Community, it must be
generally accepted internationally and have been devel-
interested parties
oped with full participation of all
procedure,
and
following
add to the credibility and quality of annual accounts and
consolidated accounts and be conducive to the European
public good. The need for the adoption of an Interna-
tional Auditing Practice Statement as part of a standard
should be assessed in accordance with Decision 1999/
468/EC on a case-by-case basis. The Commission should
ensure that before the start of the adoption process a
review is conducted in order to verify whether those
requirements have been met and report to members of
this Directive on the
the Committee set up under
outcome of the review.

(15)

In the case of consolidated accounts, it is important that
there be a clear definition of responsibilities as between
the
the statutory auditors who audit components of
group. For this purpose, the group auditor should bear
full responsibility for the audit report.

(16)

In order to increase comparability between companies
applying the same accounting standards, and to enhance
public confidence in the audit function, the Commission
may adopt a common audit report
for the audit of
annual accounts or consolidated accounts prepared on
the basis of approved international accounting standards,

unless an appropriate standard for such a report has
been adopted at Community level.

(17)

Regular inspections are a good means of achieving a
consistently high quality in statutory audits. Statutory
auditors and audit firms should therefore be subject to a
system of quality assurance that
is organised in a
manner which is independent from the reviewed statu-
tory auditors and audit firms. For the application of
Article 29 on quality assurance systems, Member States
may decide that if individual auditors have a common
quality assurance policy, only the requirements for audit
firms need to be considered. Member States may orga-
nise the system of quality assurance in such a manner
that each individual auditor is to be subject to a quality
assurance review at least every six years. In this respect,
the funding for the quality assurance system should be
free from undue influence. The Commission should have
the competence to adopt
implementing measures in
matters relevant to the organisation of quality assurance
systems, and in respect of its funding,
in cases where
public confidence in the quality assurance system is
seriously compromised. The public oversight systems of
Member States should be encouraged to find a coordi-
nated approach to the carrying-out of quality assurance
reviews with a view to avoiding the imposition of unne-
cessary burdens on the parties concerned.

(18)

Investigations and appropriate penalties help to prevent
and correct inadequate execution of a statutory audit.

(19)

Statutory auditors and audit firms are responsible for
carrying out their work with due care and thus should
be liable for the financial damage caused by a lack of the
care owed. However, the auditors' and audit firms' ability
to obtain professional indemnity insurance cover may be
affected by whether they are subject to unlimited finan-
cial liability. For its part, the Commission intends exam-
ining these issues, taking into account the fact that liabi-
lity regimes of the Member States may vary consider-
ably.

(20) Member States should organise an effective system of
public oversight for statutory auditors and audit firms
on the basis of home country control. The regulatory
arrangements for public oversight should make possible
effective cooperation at Community level in respect of
the Member States' oversight activities. The public over-
sight system should be governed by non-practitioners
who are knowledgeable in the areas relevant to statutory
audit. These non-practitioners may be specialists who
have never been linked with the audit profession or
the profession.
former practitioners who have left
Member States may, however, allow a minority of practi-
tioners to be involved in the governance of the public
system. Competent authorities of Member
oversight

L 157/90

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

9.6.2006

States should cooperate with each other whenever neces-
sary for the purpose of carrying out
their oversight
duties on statutory auditors or audit firms approved by
them. Such cooperation can make an important contri-
bution to ensuring consistently high quality in the statu-
tory audit in the Community. Since it is necessary to
ensure effective cooperation and coordination at Euro-
pean level among competent authorities designated by
Member States, the designation of one entity, responsible
for ensuring cooperation, should be without prejudice to
the ability of each single authority to cooperate directly
with the other competent authorities of the Member
States.

(21)

(22)

In order to ensure compliance with Article 32(3) on
principles of public oversight, a non-practitioner
is
deemed to be knowledgeable in the areas relevant to the
statutory audit either because of his or her past profes-
sional skill or, alternatively, because he or she has
knowledge of at
the subjects listed in
Article 8.

least one of

The statutory auditor or audit firm should be appointed
by the general meeting of shareholders or members of
the audited entity. In order to protect the independence
of the auditor it is important that dismissal should be
possible only where there are proper grounds and if
those grounds are communicated to the authority or
authorities responsible for public oversight.

(23)

Since public-interest entities have a higher visibility and
are economically more important, stricter requirements
should apply in the case of a statutory audit of their
annual or consolidated accounts.

(24) Audit committees and an effective internal control
system help to minimise financial, operational and
compliance risks, and enhance the quality of financial
reporting. Member States might have regard to the
Commission Recommendation of 15 February 2005 on
the role of non-executive or supervisory directors of
listed companies and on the committees of the (super-
visory) board (1), which sets out how audit committees
should be established and function. Member States may
determine that
the functions assigned to the audit
committee or a body performing equivalent functions
may be performed by the administrative or supervisory
body as a whole. With regard to the duties of the audit
committee under Article 41, the statutory auditor or

(1) OJ L 52, 25.2.2005, p. 51.

audit firm should in no way be subordinated to the
committee.

(25) Member States may also decide to exempt public-interest
entities which are collective investment undertakings
whose transferable securities are admitted to trading on
a regulated market from the requirement to have an
audit committee. This option takes into account the fact
that where a collective investment undertaking functions
merely for the purpose of pooling assets, the employ-
ment of an audit committee will not always be appro-
priate. The financial reporting and related risks are not
comparable to those of other public-interest entities. In
addition, undertakings for collective investment in trans-
ferable securities (UCITS) and their management compa-
nies operate in a strictly defined regulatory environment
and are subject to specific governance mechanisms such
as controls exercised by their depositary. For those
collective investment undertakings which are not harmo-
nised by Directive 85/611/EEC (2) but are subject
to
equivalent safeguards as provided for by that Directive,
Member States should, in this particular case, be allowed
to provide for equal treatment with Community-harmo-
nised collective investment undertakings.

(26)

(27)

In order to reinforce the independence of auditors of
public-interest entities, the key audit partner(s) auditing
such entities should rotate. To organise such rotation,
Member States should require a change of key audit
partner(s) dealing with an audited entity, while allowing
the audit firm with which the key audit partner(s) is/are
associated to continue being the statutory auditor of
such entity. Where a Member State considers it appro-
priate in order to attain the objectives pursued, that
Member State might, alternatively, require a change of
audit firm, without prejudice to Article 42(2).

The interrelation of capital markets underlines the need
also to ensure high-quality work performed by auditors
from third countries in relation to the Community
capital market. The auditors concerned should therefore
be registered so as to make them subject to quality
assurance reviews and to the system of investigations
and penalties. Derogations on the basis of reciprocity
should be possible subject to an equivalence testing to
be performed by the Commission in cooperation with
Member States. In any case, an entity which has issued
transferable securities on a regulated market within the

(2) Council Directive 85/611/EEC of 20 December 1985 on the coordi-
nation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to
in transferable securities
undertakings for collective investment
(UCITS) (OJ L 375, 31.12.1985, p. 3). Directive as last amended by
Directive 2005/1/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
(OJ L 79, 24.3.2005, p. 9).

9.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 157/91

meaning of point 14 of Article 4(1) of Directive 2004/
39/EC should always be audited by an auditor either
registered in a Member State or overseen by competent
authorities of the third country from which the auditor
comes from, provided that
the said third country is
acknowledged by the Commission or a Member State as
meeting the requirements equivalent
to Community
requirements in the field of principles of oversight,
quality assurance systems and systems of investigations
and penalties, and that the basis of this arrangement is
reciprocity. While one Member State may consider a
third country's quality assurance system equivalent,
other Member States should not be bound to accept that
assessment, nor should the Commission's decision be
pre-empted thereby.

(32)

(28)

The complexity of international group audits requires
good cooperation between the competent authorities of
Member States and those of third countries. Member
States should therefore ensure that competent authorities
of third countries can have access to audit working
papers and other documents
through the national
competent authorities. In order to protect the rights of
the parties concerned and at the same time facilitate
access to those papers and documents, Member States
should be allowed to grant direct access to the compe-
tent authorities of third countries, subject to the agree-
ment of the national competent authority. One of the
relevant criteria for the granting of access is whether the
competent authorities in third countries meet require-
ments which the Commission has declared adequate.
Pending such a decision by the Commission, and
without prejudice thereto, Member States may assess
whether the requirements are adequate.

(29) Disclosure of information as referred to in Articles 36
and 47 should be in accordance with the rules on the
transfer of personal data to third countries as laid down
in Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of
the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of
individuals with regard to the processing of personal
data and on the free movement of such data (1).

(30)

(31)

The measures necessary for the implementation of this
Directive should be adopted in accordance with Decision
1999/468/EC and with due regard to the declaration
made by the Commission in the European Parliament on
5 February 2002 concerning the implementation of
financial services legislation.

The European Parliament should be given a period of
three months from the first transmission of draft amend-
to
ments and implementing measures
to allow it
examine them and to give its opinion. However,
in
urgent and duly justified cases, it should be possible to
shorten that period. If, within that period, a resolution is

adopted by the European Parliament, the Commission
should re-examine the draft amendments or measures.

third countries,

Since the objectives of this Directive — namely requiring
the application of a single set of international auditing
standards, the updating of the educational requirements,
the definition of professional ethics and the technical
implementation of the cooperation between competent
authorities of Member States and between those authori-
ties and the authorities of
in order
further to enhance and harmonise the quality of statu-
tory audit in the Community and to facilitate coopera-
tion between Member States and with third countries so
as to strengthen confidence in the statutory audit —
cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States
and can therefore, by reason of the scale and effects of
this Directive, be better achieved at Community level,
the Community may adopt measures,
in accordance
with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5
of
In accordance with the principle of
proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive
is necessary in order to
does not go beyond what
achieve those objectives.

the Treaty.

transparent,

(33) With a view to rendering the relationship between the
statutory auditor or audit firm and the audited entity
more
and
Directives
83/349/EEC should be amended so as to require disclo-
sure of the audit fee and the fee paid for non-audit
services in the notes to the annual accounts and the
consolidated accounts.

78/660/EEC

(34) Directive 84/253/EEC should be repealed because it
lacks a comprehensive set of rules to ensure an appro-
infrastructure, such as public oversight,
priate audit
disciplinary systems and systems of quality assurance,
and because it does not provide specifically for regula-
tory cooperation between Member States and third
countries. In order to ensure legal certainty, there is a
clear need to indicate that statutory auditors and audit
that have been approved under Directive
firms
84/253/EEC are considered as approved under
this
Directive,

HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:

CHAPTER I

SUBJECT MATTER AND DEFINITIONS

Article 1

Subject matter

(1) OJ L 281, 23.11.1995, p. 31. Directive as amended by Regulation

(EC) No 1882/2003 (OJ L 284, 31.10.2003, p. 1).

This Directive establishes rules concerning the statutory audit
of annual and consolidated accounts.

L 157/92

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

9.6.2006

Article 2

Definitions

For the purpose of this Directive, the following definitions shall
apply:

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

‘statutory audit’ means an audit of annual accounts or
consolidated accounts insofar as required by Community
law;

‘statutory auditor’ means a natural person who is approved
in accordance with this Directive by the competent autho-
rities of a Member State to carry out statutory audits;

‘audit firm’ means a legal person or any other entity,
regardless of its legal form, that is approved in accordance
with this Directive by the competent authorities of a
Member State to carry out statutory audits;

‘third-country audit entity’ means an entity, regardless of
its legal form, which carries out audits of the annual or
consolidated accounts of a company incorporated in a
third country;

‘third-country auditor’ means a natural person who carries
out audits of the annual or consolidated accounts of a
company incorporated in a third country;

‘group auditor’ means the statutory auditor(s) or audit
firm(s) carrying out the statutory audit of consolidated
accounts;

7.

‘network’ means the larger structure:

— which is aimed at cooperation and to which a statutory

auditor or an audit firm belongs, and

— which is clearly aimed at profit- or cost-sharing or
shares common ownership, control or management,
common quality-control policies and procedures, a
common business strategy,
the use of a common
brand-name or a significant part of professional
resources;

or oversight of statutory auditors and audit firms or of
specific aspects
the reference to ‘competent
in a specific article means a reference to the
authority’
functions
authority or body(ies)
referred to in that Article;

responsible

thereof;

the

for

11.

‘international auditing standards’ means International Stan-
dards on Auditing (ISA) and related Statements and Stan-
dards, insofar as relevant to the statutory audit;

12.

13.

Standards

‘international accounting standards’ means International
Financial
(IAS),
Accounting
Reporting Standards (IFRS) and related Interpretations
(SIC-IFRIC interpretations),
to
those standards and related interpretations, and future
standards and related interpretations issued or adopted by
the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB);

subsequent amendments

International

‘public-interest entities’ means entities governed by the law
of a Member State whose transferable securities are
admitted to trading on a regulated market of any Member
State within the meaning of point 14 of Article 4(1) of
Directive 2004/39/EC, credit
institutions as defined in
point 1 of Article 1of Directive 2000/12/EC of the Euro-
pean Parliament and of the Council of 20 March 2000
relating to the taking up and pursuit of the business of
institutions (1) and insurance undertakings within
credit
the meaning of Article 2(1) of Directive 91/674/EEC.
Member States may also designate other entities as public-
interest entities, for instance entities that are of significant
public relevance because of the nature of their business,
their size or the number of their employees;

14.

‘cooperative’ means a European Cooperative Society as
defined in Article 1 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1435/
2003 of 22 July 2003 on the Statute for a European
Cooperative Society (SCE) (2), or any other cooperative for
which a statutory audit is required under Community law,
such as credit institutions as defined in point 1 of Article 1
of Directive 2000/12/EC and insurance undertakings
within the meaning of Article 2(1) of Directive 91/674/
EEC;

8.

9.

‘affiliate of an audit firm’ means any undertaking, regard-
less of its legal form, which is connected to an audit firm
by means of common ownership, control or management;

15.

‘audit report’ means the report referred to in Article 51a
of Directive 78/660/EEC and Article 37 of Directive
83/349/EEC issued by the statutory auditor or audit firm;

‘non-practitioner’ means any natural person who, for at
least three years before his or her involvement in the
governance of the public oversight system, has not carried
out statutory audits, has not held voting rights in an audit
firm, has not been a member of the administrative or
management body of an audit firm and has not been
employed by, or otherwise associated with, an audit firm;

10.

‘competent authorities’ means the authorities or bodies
designated by law that are in charge of the regulation and/

(1) OJ L 126, 26.5.2000, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Commis-

sion Directive 2006/29/EC (OJ L 70, 9.3.2006, p. 50).

(2) OJ L 207, 18.8.2003, p. 1.

9.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 157/93

16.

‘key audit partner(s)’ mean(s):

(a) the statutory auditor(s) designated by an audit firm for
a particular audit engagement as being primarily
responsible for carrying out
the statutory audit on
behalf of the audit firm; or

(b) in the case of a group audit, at least the statutory audi-
tor(s) designated by an audit firm as being primarily
responsible for carrying out the statutory audit at the
level of the group and the statutory auditor(s) desig-
nated as being primarily responsible at the level of
material subsidiaries; or

(c) the statutory auditor(s) who sign(s) the audit report.

CHAPTER II

APPROVAL, CONTINUING EDUCATION AND MUTUAL
RECOGNITION

Article 3

Approval of statutory auditors and audit firms

1.
A statutory audit shall be carried out only by statutory
auditors or audit firms which are approved by the Member
State requiring the statutory audit.

2.
Each Member State shall designate competent authorities
which shall be responsible for approving statutory auditors and
audit firms.

The competent authorities may be professional associations,
provided that they are subject to a system of public oversight
as provided for in Chapter VIII.

audit of cooperatives and similar entities as referred to in
Article 45 of Directive 86/635/EEC, Member States may
establish other specific provisions in relation to voting
rights;

(c) a majority — up to a maximum of 75 % — of

the
members of the administrative or management body of the
entity must be audit firms which are approved in any
Member State or natural persons who satisfy at least the
conditions imposed by Articles 4 and 6 to 12. Member
States may provide that such natural persons must also
have been approved in another Member State. Where such
a body has no more than two members, one of those
members must satisfy at least the conditions in this point;

(d) the firm must satisfy the condition imposed by Article 4.

Member States may set additional conditions only in relation to
point (c). Such conditions shall be proportionate to the objec-
tives pursued and shall not go beyond what is strictly neces-
sary.

Article 4

Good repute

The competent authorities of a Member State may grant
approval only to natural persons or firms of good repute.

Article 5

Withdrawal of approval

3. Without prejudice to Article 11, the competent authori-
ties of the Member States may approve as statutory auditors
only natural persons who satisfy at least the conditions laid
down in Articles 4 and 6 to 10.

Approval of a statutory auditor or an audit firm shall be
1.
withdrawn if the good repute of that person or firm has been
seriously compromised. Member States may, however, provide
for a reasonable period of time for the purpose of meeting the
requirements of good repute.

4.
The competent authorities of the Member States may
approve as audit firms only those entities which satisfy the
following conditions:

(a) the natural persons who carry out statutory audits on
behalf of an audit firm must satisfy at least the conditions
imposed by Articles 4 and 6 to 12 and must be approved
as statutory auditors in the Member State concerned;

(b) a majority of the voting rights in an entity must be held by
audit firms which are approved in any Member State or by
natural persons who satisfy at least the conditions imposed
by Articles 4 and 6 to 12. Member States may provide that
such natural persons must also have been approved in
another Member State. For the purpose of the statutory

2.
Approval of an audit firm shall be withdrawn if any of
the conditions imposed in Article 3(4), points (b) and (c) is no
longer fulfilled. Member States may, however, provide for a
reasonable period of time for the purpose of fulfilling those
conditions.

3. Where the approval of a statutory auditor or of an audit
firm is withdrawn for any reason, the competent authority of
the Member State where the approval
is withdrawn shall
communicate that fact and the reasons for the withdrawal to
the relevant competent authorities of Member States where the
statutory auditor or audit firm is also approved which are
entered in the first-named Member State's register in accord-
ance with Article 16(1), point (c).

L 157/94

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

9.6.2006

Article 6

(d) civil and commercial law;

Educational qualifications

(e) social security law and employment law;

Without prejudice to Article 11, a natural person may be
approved to carry out a statutory audit only after having
attained university entrance or equivalent level, then completed
a course of theoretical instruction, undergone practical training
and passed an examination of professional competence of
university final or equivalent examination level, organised or
recognised by the Member State concerned.

Article 7

Examination of professional competence

The examination of professional competence referred to in
theoretical
Article 6 shall guarantee the necessary level of
knowledge of subjects relevant to statutory audit and the ability
to apply such knowledge in practice. Part at least of that exami-
nation shall be written.

Article 8

Test of theoretical knowledge

The test of theoretical knowledge included in the exami-

1.
nation shall cover the following subjects in particular:

(a) general accounting theory and principles;

(b) legal requirements and standards relating to the preparation

of annual and consolidated accounts;

(c) international accounting standards;

(d) financial analysis;

(e) cost and management accounting;

(f) risk management and internal control;

(g) auditing and professional skills;

(h) legal requirements and professional standards relating to

statutory audit and statutory auditors;

(i) international auditing standards;

(j) professional ethics and independence.

It shall also cover at least the following subjects insofar as

2.
they are relevant to auditing:

(a) company law and corporate governance;

(b) the law of insolvency and similar procedures;

(c) tax law;

(f) information technology and computer systems;

(g) business, general and financial economics;

(h) mathematics and statistics;

(i) basic principles of the financial management of undertak-

ings.

3.
The Commission may, in accordance with the procedure
referred to in Article 48(2), adapt the list of subjects to be
included in the test of theoretical knowledge referred to in
paragraph 1. When adopting those implementing measures the
Commission shall take into account developments in auditing
and the audit profession.

Article 9

Exemptions

By way of derogation from Articles 7 and 8, a Member
1.
State may provide that a person who has passed a university or
equivalent examination or holds a university degree or equiva-
lent qualification in one or more of the subjects referred to in
Article 8 may be exempted from the test of theoretical knowl-
edge in the subjects covered by that examination or degree.

2.
By way of derogation from Article 7, a Member State
may provide that a holder of a university degree or equivalent
qualification in one or more of the subjects referred to in
Article 8 may be exempted from the test of the ability to apply
in practice his or her theoretical knowledge of such subjects if
he or she has received practical
training in those subjects
attested by an examination or diploma recognised by the State.

Article 10

Practical training

1.
In order to ensure the ability to apply theoretical knowl-
edge in practice, a test of which is included in the examination,
a trainee shall complete a minimum of three years' practical
training in, inter alia, the auditing of annual accounts, consoli-
dated accounts or similar financial statements. At least two
thirds of such practical training shall be completed with a statu-
tory auditor or audit firm approved in any Member State.

2. Member States shall ensure that all training is carried out
with persons providing adequate guarantees regarding their
ability to provide practical training.

9.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 157/95

Article 11

Article 14

Qualification through long-term practical experience

Approval of statutory auditors from other Member States

A Member State may approve a person who does not satisfy
the conditions laid down in Article 6 as a statutory auditor, if
he or she can show either:

(a) that he or she has, for 15 years, engaged in professional
activities which have enabled him or her to acquire suffi-
cient experience in the fields of finance, law and accoun-
tancy, and has passed the examination of professional
competence referred to in Article 7, or

(b) that he or she has, for seven years, engaged in professional
activities in those fields and has, in addition, undergone the
practical training referred to in Article 10 and passed the
examination of professional competence referred to in
Article 7.

Article 12

Combination of practical training and theoretical instruc-
tion

The competent authorities of the Member States shall establish
procedures for the approval of statutory auditors who have
been approved in other Member States. Those procedures shall
not go beyond a requirement to pass an aptitude test in accord-
ance with Article 4 of Council Directive 89/48/EEC of
21 December 1988 on a general system for the recognition of
higher-education diplomas awarded on completion of profes-
sional education and training of at least three years' duration (1).
The aptitude test, which shall be conducted in one of the
languages permitted by the language rules applicable in the
Member State concerned, shall cover only the statutory audi-
tor's adequate knowledge of the laws and regulations of that
Member State in so far as relevant to statutory audits.

CHAPTER III

REGISTRATION

Article 15

Public register

1. Member States may provide that periods of theoretical
instruction in the fields referred to in Article 8 shall count
towards the periods of professional activity referred to in
Article 11, provided that such instruction is attested by an
examination recognised by the State. Such instruction shall not
last less than one year, nor may it reduce the period of profes-
sional activity by more than four years.

1.
Each Member State shall ensure that statutory auditors
and audit firms are entered in a public register in accordance
with Articles 16 and 17. In exceptional circumstances, Member
States may disapply the requirements laid down in this Article
and Article 16 regarding disclosure only to the extent necessary
to mitigate an imminent and significant threat to the personal
security of any person.

2.
The period of professional activity and practical training
shall not be shorter than the course of theoretical instruction
together with the practical training required in Article 10.

Article 13

Continuing education

2. Member States shall ensure that each statutory auditor
and audit firm is identified in the public register by an indivi-
dual number. Registration information shall be stored in the
register in electronic form and shall be electronically accessible
to the public.

3.
The public register shall also contain the name and
address of the competent authorities responsible for approval
as referred to in Article 3, for quality assurance as referred to
in Article 29, for investigations and penalties on statutory audi-
tors and audit firms as referred to in Article 30, and for public
oversight as referred to in Article 32.

Member States shall ensure that statutory auditors are required
to take part in appropriate programmes of continuing educa-
tion in order to maintain their theoretical knowledge, profes-
sional skills and values at a sufficiently high level, and that
failure to respect
the continuing education requirements is
subject to appropriate penalties as referred to in Article 30.

4. Member States shall ensure that the public register is fully
operational by 29 June 2009.

(1) OJ L 19, 24.1.1989, p. 16. Directive as amended by Directive
2001/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ
L 206, 31.7.2001, p. 1).

L 157/96

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

9.6.2006

Article 16

Article 18

Registration of statutory auditors

Updating of registration information

As regards statutory auditors, the public register shall

1.
contain at least the following information:

(a) name, address and registration number;

(b) if applicable, the name, address, website address and regis-
tration number of the audit firm(s) by which the statutory
auditor is employed, or with whom he or she is associated
as a partner or otherwise;

(c) all other registration(s) as statutory auditor with the compe-
tent authorities of other Member States and as auditor with
third countries,
including the name(s) of the registration
authority(ies), and, if applicable, the registration number(s).

Third-country auditors

2.
registered in accordance with
Article 45 shall be clearly indicated in the register as such and
not as statutory auditors.

Article 17

Registration of audit firms

As regards audit firms, the public register shall contain at

1.
least the following information:

(a) name, address and registration number;

(b) legal form;

(c) contact

information,

the primary contact person and,

where applicable, the website address;

(d) address of each office in the Member State;

(e) name and registration number of all statutory auditors
employed by or associated as partners or otherwise with
the audit firm;

(f) names and business addresses of all owners and share-

holders;

(g) names and business addresses of all members of the admin-

istrative or management body;

(h) if applicable, the membership of a network and a list of the
names and addresses of member firms and affiliates or an
indication of the place where such information is publicly
available;

(i) all other registration(s) as audit firm with the competent
authorities of other Member States and as audit entity with
third countries,
including the name(s) of the registration
authority(ies), and, if applicable, the registration number(s).

2.
Third-country audit entities registered in accordance with
Article 45 shall be clearly indicated in the register as such and
not as audit firms.

Member States shall ensure that statutory auditors and audit
firms notify the competent authorities in charge of the public
register without undue delay of any change of information
contained in the public register. The register shall be updated
without undue delay after notification.

Article 19

Responsibility for registration information

The information provided to the relevant competent authorities
in accordance with Articles 16, 17 and 18 shall be signed by
the statutory auditor or audit
firm. Where the competent
authority provides for the information to be made available
electronically, that can, for example, be done by means of an
electronic signature as defined in point 1 of Article 2 of Direc-
tive 1999/93/EC of
the
Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community framework for
electronic signatures (1).

the European Parliament and of

Article 20

Language

The information entered in the public register shall be
1.
drawn up in one of the languages permitted by the language
rules applicable in the Member State concerned.

2. Member States may additionally allow the information to
be entered in the public register in any other official language(s)
of the Community. Member States may require the translation
of the information to be certified.

In all cases, the Member State concerned shall ensure that the
register indicates whether or not the translation is certified.

CHAPTER IV

PROFESSIONAL

ETHICS,

INDEPENDENCE, OBJECTIVITY,

CONFIDENTIALITY AND PROFESSIONAL SECRECY

Article 21

Professional ethics

firms are subject

1. Member States shall ensure that all statutory auditors and
audit
to principles of professional ethics,
covering at least their public-interest function, their integrity
and objectivity and their professional competence and due care.

(1) OJ L 13, 19.1.2000, p. 12.

9.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 157/97

2.
In order to ensure confidence in the audit function and to
ensure uniform application of paragraph 1 of this Article, the
Commission may, in accordance with the procedure referred to
in Article 48(2), adopt principle-based implementing measures
governing professional ethics.

(c) the cases of self-review and self-interest referred to in the
in which statutory

second subparagraph of paragraph 2,
audits may or may not be carried out.

Article 22

Independence and objectivity

1. Member States shall ensure that when carrying out a stat-
utory audit, the statutory auditor and/or the audit firm is inde-
pendent of the audited entity and is not involved in the deci-
sion-taking of the audited entity.

2. Member States shall ensure that a statutory auditor or an
audit firm shall not carry out a statutory audit if there is any
direct or indirect financial, business, employment or other rela-
tionship — including the provision of additional non-audit
firm or
services — between the statutory auditor, audit
network and the audited entity from which an objective,
reasonable and informed third party would conclude that the
statutory auditor's or audit
firm's independence is compro-
mised. If the statutory auditor's or audit firm's independence is
affected by threats, such as self-review, self-interest, advocacy,
familiarity or trust or intimidation, the statutory auditor or
audit firm must apply safeguards in order to mitigate those
threats. If the significance of the threats compared to the safe-
guards applied is such that his, her or its independence is
compromised, the statutory auditor or audit firm shall not
carry out the statutory audit.

Member States shall in addition ensure that, where statutory
audits of public-interest entities are concerned and where
appropriate to safeguard the statutory auditor's or audit firm's
independence, a statutory auditor or an audit firm shall not
in cases of self-review or self-
carry out a statutory audit
interest.

3. Member States shall ensure that a statutory auditor or
audit firm documents in the audit working papers all significant
threats to his, her or its independence as well as the safeguards
applied to mitigate those threats.

4.
In order to ensure confidence in the audit function and to
ensure uniform application of paragraphs 1 and 2 of this
Article, the Commission may, in accordance with the procedure
referred to in Article 48(2), adopt principle-based implementing
measures concerning:

(a) the threats and safeguards referred to in paragraph 2;

(b) the situations in which the significance of the threats, as
referred to in paragraph 2, is such that the independence of
the statutory auditor or audit firm is compromised;

Article 23

Confidentiality and professional secrecy

1. Member States shall ensure that all information and docu-
ments to which a statutory auditor or audit firm has access
when carrying out a statutory audit are protected by adequate
rules on confidentiality and professional secrecy.

2.
Confidentiality and professional secrecy rules relating to
statutory auditors or audit firms shall not impede enforcement
of the provisions of this Directive.

3. Where a statutory auditor or audit firm is replaced by
another statutory auditor or audit firm, the former statutory
auditor or audit
firm shall provide the incoming statutory
auditor or audit firm with access to all relevant information
concerning the audited entity.

4.
A statutory auditor or audit firm who has ceased to be
engaged in a particular audit assignment and a former statutory
auditor or audit firm shall remain subject to the provisions of
paragraphs 1 and 2 with respect to that audit assignment.

Article 24

Independence and objectivity of the statutory auditors
carrying out the statutory audit on behalf of audit firms

Member States shall ensure that the owners or shareholders of
an audit firm as well as the members of the administrative,
management and supervisory bodies of such a firm, or of an
affiliated firm, do not intervene in the execution of a statutory
audit
in any way which jeopardises the independence and
objectivity of the statutory auditor who carries out the statutory
audit on behalf of the audit firm.

Article 25

Audit fees

Member States shall ensure that adequate rules are in place
which provide that fees for statutory audits:

(a) are not influenced or determined by the provision of addi-

tional services to the audited entity;

(b) cannot be based on any form of contingency.

L 157/98

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

9.6.2006

CHAPTER V

Article 27

AUDITING STANDARDS AND AUDIT REPORTING

Statutory audits of consolidated accounts

Article 26

Auditing standards

1. Member States shall require statutory auditors and audit
firms to carry out statutory audits in compliance with interna-
tional auditing standards adopted by the Commission in
accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 48(2).
Member States may apply a national auditing standard as long
as the Commission has not adopted an international auditing
standard covering the same subject-matter. Adopted interna-
tional auditing standards shall be published in full in each of
the official languages of the Community in the Official Journal
of the European Union.

The Commission may decide,

in accordance with the
2.
procedure referred to in Article 48(2), on the applicability of
international auditing standards within the Community. The
Commission shall adopt international auditing standards for
application in the Community only if they:

(a) have been developed with proper due process, public over-
sight and transparency, and are generally accepted interna-
tionally;

(b) contribute a high level of credibility and quality to the
annual or consolidated accounts in conformity with the
principles set out in Article 2(3) of Directive 78/660/EEC
and in Article 16(3) of Directive 83/349/EEC; and

(c) are conducive to the European public good.

3. Member States may impose audit procedures or require-
ments in addition to — or, in exceptional cases, by carving out
parts of — the international auditing standards only if these
stem from specific national legal requirements relating to the
scope of statutory audits. Member States shall ensure that these
audit procedures or requirements comply with the provisions
laid down in points (b) and (c) of paragraph 2 and shall
communicate them to the Commission and Member States
before their adoption. In the exceptional case of the carving
out of parts of an international auditing standard, Member
States shall communicate their specific national legal require-
ments, as well as the grounds for maintaining them, to the
Commission and the other Member States at least six months
before their national adoption or, in the case of requirements
already existing at the time of adoption of an international
auditing standard, at the latest within three months of the
adoption of the relevant international auditing standard.

4. Member States may impose additional
requirements
relating to the statutory audits of annual and consolidated
accounts for a period expiring on 29 June 2010.

Member States shall ensure that in the case of a statutory audit
of the consolidated accounts of a group of undertakings:

(a) the group auditor bears the full responsibility for the audit

report in relation with the consolidated accounts;

(b) the group auditor carries out a review and maintains docu-
mentation of his or her review of the audit work performed
by third-country auditor(s),
third-
country audit entity(ies) or audit firm(s) for the purpose of
the group audit. The documentation retained by the group
auditor shall be such as enables the relevant competent
authority to review the work of the group auditor properly;

statutory auditor(s),

is

(c) when a component of a group of undertakings is audited
by auditor(s) or audit entity(ies) from a third country that
has no working arrangement as referred to in Article 47,
the group auditor
responsible for ensuring proper
delivery, when requested, to the public oversight authorities
of the documentation of the audit work performed by the
including the
third-country auditor(s) or audit entity(ies),
working papers relevant to the group audit. To ensure such
delivery, the group auditor shall retain a copy of such docu-
mentation, or alternatively agree with the third-country
auditor(s) or audit entity(ies) his proper and unrestricted
access upon request, or take any other appropriate action.
If legal or other impediments prevent audit working papers
from being passed from a third country to the group
auditor, the documentation retained by the group auditor
shall include evidence that he or she has undertaken the
appropriate procedures in order to gain access to the audit
documentation, and in the case of impediments other than
legal ones arising from country legislation,
evidence
supporting such an impediment.

Article 28

Audit reporting

1. Where an audit firm carries out the statutory audit, the
audit report shall be signed by at least the statutory auditor(s)
carrying out the statutory audit on behalf of the audit firm.
In exceptional circumstances Member States may provide that
this signature need not be disclosed to the public if such disclo-
sure could lead to an imminent and significant threat to the
personal security of any person. In any case the name(s) of the
person(s) involved shall be known to the relevant competent
authorities.

9.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 157/99

2.
Notwithstanding Article 51a(1) of Directive 78/660/EEC,
if the Commission has not adopted a common standard for
audit reports in accordance with Article 26(1) of this Directive,
in accordance with the procedure referred to in
it may,
Article 48(2) of this Directive, adopt a common standard for
audit reports for annual or consolidated accounts which have
been prepared in accordance with approved international
accounting standards, in order to enhance public confidence in
the audit function.

CHAPTER VI

QUALITY ASSURANCE

Article 29

Quality assurance systems

1.
Each Member State shall ensure that all statutory auditors
and audit firms are subject to a system of quality assurance
which meets at least the following criteria:

(a) the quality assurance system shall be organised in such a
manner that it is independent of the reviewed statutory
auditors and audit firms and subject to public oversight as
provided for in Chapter VIII;

(b) the funding for the quality assurance system shall be secure
and free from any possible undue influence by statutory
auditors or audit firms;

(c) the quality assurance system shall have adequate resources;

appropriate professional

(d) the persons who carry out quality assurance reviews shall
education and relevant
have
experience
reporting
in statutory audit and financial
combined with specific training on quality assurance
reviews;

(e) the selection of reviewers for specific quality assurance
review assignments shall be effected in accordance with an
objective procedure designed to ensure that there are no
conflicts of interest between the reviewers and the statutory
auditor or audit firm under review;

(f) the scope of the quality assurance review, supported by
adequate testing of selected audit files, shall
include an
assessment of compliance with applicable auditing stan-
dards and independence requirements, of the quantity and
quality of resources spent, of the audit fees charged and of
the internal quality control system of the audit firm;

(g) the quality assurance review shall be the subject of a report
which shall contain the main conclusions of the quality
assurance review;

(h) quality assurance reviews shall take place at least every six

years;

(i) the overall results of the quality assurance system shall be

published annually;

(j) recommendations of quality reviews shall be followed up
by the statutory auditor or audit firm within a reasonable
period.

If the recommendations referred to in point (j) are not followed
up, the statutory auditor or audit firm shall, if applicable, be
subject
to the system of disciplinary actions or penalties
referred to in Article 30.

2.
The Commission may, in accordance with the procedure
referred to in Article 48(2), adopt implementing measures in
order to enhance public confidence in the audit function and
to ensure uniform application of points (a), (b) and (e) to (j) of
paragraph 1.

CHAPTER VII

INVESTIGATIONS AND PENALTIES

Article 30

Systems of investigations and penalties

1. Member States
there are effective
shall ensure that
systems of investigations and penalties to detect, correct and
prevent inadequate execution of the statutory audit.

to Member States'

2. Without prejudice
liability
regimes, Member States shall provide for effective, propor-
tionate and dissuasive penalties in respect of statutory auditors
and audit firms, where statutory audits are not carried out in
conformity with the provisions adopted in the implementation
of this Directive.

civil

3. Member States shall provide that measures taken and
penalties imposed on statutory auditors and audit firms are
appropriately disclosed to the public. Penalties shall include the
possibility of the withdrawal of approval.

Article 31

Auditors' liability

Before 1 January 2007 the Commission shall present a report
on the impact of the current national
liability rules for the
carrying out of statutory audits on European capital markets
and on the insurance conditions for statutory auditors and
audit firms, including an objective analysis of the limitations of
liability. The Commission shall, where appropriate,
financial
carry out a public consultation. In the light of that report, the
Commission shall, if it considers it appropriate, submit recom-
mendations to the Member States.

L 157/100

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

9.6.2006

CHAPTER VIII

Article 33

PUBLIC OVERSIGHT AND REGULATORY ARRANGEMENTS
BETWEEN MEMBER STATES

Cooperation between public oversight systems at Com-
munity level

Article 32

Principles of public oversight

Member States shall ensure that regulatory arrangements for
public oversight systems permit effective cooperation at Com-
munity level in respect of Member States' oversight activities.
To that end, each Member State shall make one entity specifi-
cally responsible for ensuring that cooperation.

1. Member States shall organise an effective system of public
oversight for statutory auditors and audit firms based on the
principles set out in paragraphs 2 to 7.

Article 34

All statutory auditors and audit firms shall be subject to

2.
public oversight.

The system of public oversight shall be governed by non-
3.
practitioners who are knowledgeable in the areas relevant to
statutory audit. Member States may, however, allow a minority
of practitioners to be involved in the governance of the public
oversight system. Persons involved in the governance of the
public oversight system shall be selected in accordance with an
independent and transparent nomination procedure.

The system of public oversight shall have the ultimate

4.
responsibility for the oversight of:

(a) the approval and registration of statutory auditors and

audit firms;

(b) the adoption of standards on professional ethics, internal

quality control of audit firms and auditing, and

(c) continuing education, quality assurance and investigative

and disciplinary systems.

The system of public oversight shall have the right, where
to conduct investigations in relation to statutory
to take appropriate

5.
necessary,
auditors and audit firms and the right
action.

Mutual recognition of regulatory arrangements between
Member States

1.
Regulatory arrangements of Member States shall respect
the principle of home-country regulation and oversight by the
Member State in which the statutory auditor or audit firm is
approved and the audited entity has its registered office.

2.
In the case of a statutory audit of consolidated accounts,
the Member State requiring the statutory audit of the consoli-
dated accounts may not impose additional requirements in rela-
tion to the statutory audit concerning registration, quality
assurance review, auditing standards, professional ethics and
independence on a statutory auditor or audit firm carrying out
a statutory audit of a subsidiary established in another Member
State.

In the case of a company whose securities are traded on a
3.
regulated market in a Member State other than that in which
that company has its registered office, the Member State in
which the securities are traded may not impose any additional
requirements in relation to the statutory audit concerning regis-
tration, quality assurance review, auditing standards, profes-
sional ethics and independence on a statutory auditor or audit
firm carrying out the statutory audit of the annual or consoli-
dated accounts of that company.

Article 35

Designation of competent authorities

6.
The system of public oversight shall be transparent. This
shall include the publication of annual work programmes and
activity reports.

The system of public oversight

shall be adequately
7.
funded. The funding for the public oversight system shall be
secure and free from any undue influence by statutory auditors
or audit firms.

1. Member States shall designate one or more competent
authorities for the purposes of the tasks provided for in this
Directive. Member States shall inform the Commission of their
designation.

The competent authorities shall be organised in such a

2.
manner that conflicts of interests are avoided.

9.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 157/101

Article 36

(b) judicial proceedings have already been initiated in respect
of the same actions and against the same statutory auditors
or audit
the requested
Member State; or

firms before the authorities of

Professional secrecy and regulatory cooperation between
Member States

The competent authorities of Member States responsible
1.
for approval, registration, quality assurance,
inspection and
discipline shall cooperate with each other whenever necessary
for the purpose of carrying out their respective responsibilities
under this Directive. The competent authorities in a Member
State responsible for approval, registration, quality assurance,
inspection and discipline shall render assistance to competent
authorities in other Member States. In particular, competent
authorities shall exchange information and cooperate in investi-
gations related to the carrying-out of statutory audits.

2.
The obligation of professional secrecy shall apply to all
persons who are employed or who have been employed by
competent authorities.
Information covered by professional
secrecy may not be disclosed to any other person or authority
except by virtue of
the laws, regulations or administrative
procedures of a Member State.

confidential

Paragraph 2 shall not prevent competent authorities from
3.
exchanging
thus
information.
exchanged shall be covered by the obligation of professional
secrecy, to which persons employed or formerly employed by
competent authorities are subject.

Information

4.
Competent authorities shall, on request, and without
undue delay, supply any information required for the purpose
referred to in paragraph 1. Where necessary, the competent
authorities receiving any such request shall, without undue
delay, take the necessary measures to gather the required infor-
mation. Information thus supplied shall be covered by the obli-
gation of professional secrecy to which the persons employed
or
that
formerly employed by the competent authorities
received the information are subject.

If the requested competent authority is not able to supply the
required information without undue delay, it shall notify the
requesting competent authority of the reasons therefor.

(c) final judgment has already been passed in respect of the
same actions and on the same statutory auditors or audit
firms by the competent authorities of
the requested
Member State.

Without prejudice to the obligations to which they are subject
in judicial proceedings, competent authorities which receive
information pursuant to paragraph 1 may use it only for the
exercise of their functions within the scope of this Directive
and in the context of administrative or judicial proceedings
specifically related to the exercise of those functions.

5. Where a competent authority concludes that activities
contrary to the provisions of this Directive are being or have
been carried out on the territory of another Member State, it
shall notify the competent authority of the other Member State
of that conclusion in as specific a manner as possible. The
competent authority of
take
appropriate action.
inform the notifying competent
authority of the outcome and, to the extent possible, of signifi-
cant interim developments.

the other Member State shall

It shall

6.
A competent authority of one Member State may also
request that an investigation be carried out by the competent
authority of another Member State on the latter's territory.

its own personnel be
It may further request that some of
the competent
allowed to accompany the personnel of
authority of that other Member State in the course of the inves-
tigation.

The investigation shall be subject throughout to the overall
control of the Member State on whose territory it is conducted.

The competent authorities may refuse to act on a request for
information where:

The competent authorities may refuse to act on a request for
an investigation to be carried out as provided for in the first
subparagraph, or on a request for its personnel to be accompa-
nied by personnel of a competent authority of another Member
State as provided for in the second subparagraph, where:

(a) supplying information might adversely affect

the sover-
eignty, security or public order of the requested Member
State or breach national security rules; or

(a) such an investigation might adversely affect the sovereignty,
security or public order of the requested Member State; or

L 157/102

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

9.6.2006

(b) judicial proceedings have already been initiated in respect
of the same actions and against the same persons before
the authorities of the requested Member State; or

(c) final judgment has already been passed in respect of the
same actions on such persons by the competent authorities
of the requested Member State.

In accordance with the procedure

referred to in
7.
Article 48(2)
implementing
the Commission may adopt
measures in order to facilitate cooperation between competent
authorities on the procedures for the exchange of information
and modalities for cross-border investigations provided for in
paragraphs 2 to 4 of this Article.

CHAPTER IX

APPOINTMENT AND DISMISSAL

Article 37

Appointment of statutory auditors or audit firms

1.
The statutory auditor or audit firm shall be appointed by
the general meeting of shareholders or members of the audited
entity.

2. Member States may allow alternative systems or modal-
ities for the appointment of the statutory auditor or audit firm,
provided that
those systems or modalities are designed to
ensure the independence of the statutory auditor or audit firm
from the executive members of the administrative body or
from the managerial body of the audited entity.

Article 38

CHAPTER X

SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR THE STATUTORY AUDITS OF
PUBLIC-INTEREST ENTITIES

Article 39

Application to non-listed public-interest entities

Member States may exempt public-interest entities which have
not issued transferable securities admitted to trading on a regu-
lated market within the meaning of point 14 of Article 4(1) of
Directive 2004/39/EC and their statutory auditor(s) or audit
firm(s) from one or more of the requirements in this Chapter.

Article 40

Transparency report

1. Member States shall ensure that statutory auditors and
audit firms that carry out statutory audit(s) of public-interest
entities publish on their websites, within three months of the
end of each financial year, annual transparency reports that
include at least the following:

(a) a description of the legal structure and ownership;

(b) where the audit firm belongs to a network, a description of
the network and the legal and structural arrangements in
the network;

(c) a description of the governance structure of the audit firm;

(d) a description of the internal quality control system of the
firm and a statement by the administrative or

audit
management body on the effectiveness of its functioning;

Dismissal and resignation of statutory auditors or audit
firms

(e) an indication of when the last quality assurance review

referred to in Article 29 took place;

1. Member States shall ensure that statutory auditors or
audit firms may be dismissed only where there are proper
grounds. Divergence of opinions on accounting treatments or
audit procedures shall not be proper grounds for dismissal.

(f) a list of public-interest entities for which the audit firm has
carried out statutory audits during the preceding financial
year;

2. Member States shall ensure that the audited entity and the
statutory auditor or audit firm inform the authority or authori-
ties responsible for public oversight concerning the dismissal or
resignation of the statutory auditor or audit firm during the
term of appointment and give an adequate explanation of the
reasons therefor.

(g) a statement concerning the audit firm's independence prac-
tices which also confirms that an internal review of inde-
pendence compliance has been conducted;

(h) a statement on the policy followed by the audit

firm
concerning the continuing education of statutory auditors
referred to in Article 13;

9.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 157/103

(i) financial information showing the importance of the audit
firm, such as the total turnover divided into fees from the
statutory audit of annual and consolidated accounts, and
tax advisory
fees charged for other assurance services,
services and other non-audit services;

(j) information concerning the basis for the partners' remu-

neration.

Member States may in exceptional circumstances disapply the
requirement in point (f) to the extent necessary to mitigate an
imminent and significant threat to the personal security of any
person.

2.
The transparency report shall be signed by the statutory
auditor or audit firm, as the case may be. This can be done, for
example, by means of an electronic signature as defined in
Article 2(1) of Directive 1999/93/EC.

Article 41

Audit committee

1.
Each public-interest entity shall have an audit committee.
The Member State shall determine whether audit committees
are to be composed of non-executive members of the adminis-
trative body and/or members of the supervisory body of the
audited entity and/or members appointed by the general
meeting of shareholders of the audited entity. At least one
member of the audit committee shall be independent and shall
have competence in accounting and/or auditing.

In public-interest entities which meet the criteria of Article 2(1),
(f) of Directive 2003/71/EC (1), Member States may
point
permit the functions assigned to the audit committee to be
performed by the administrative or supervisory body as a
whole, provided at least that when the chairman of such a
body is an executive member, he or she is not the chairman of
the audit committee.

2. Without prejudice to the responsibility of the members of
the administrative, management or supervisory bodies, or of
other members who are appointed by the general meeting of
shareholders of the audited entity, the audit committee shall,
inter alia:

(a) monitor the financial reporting process;

(b) monitor the effectiveness of the company's internal control,
internal audit where applicable, and risk management
systems;

(c) monitor the statutory audit of the annual and consolidated

accounts;

(1) Directive 2003/71/EC of

the
Council of 4 November 2003 on the prospectus to be published
when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading (OJ
L 345, 31.12.2003, p. 64).

the European Parliament and of

(d) review and monitor the independence of

the statutory
auditor or audit firm, and in particular the provision of
additional services to the audited entity.

3.
In a public-interest entity, the proposal of the administra-
tive or supervisory body for the appointment of a statutory
auditor or audit firm shall be based on a recommendation
made by the audit committee.

4.
The statutory auditor or audit firm shall report to the
audit committee on key matters arising from the statutory
audit, and in particular on material weaknesses in internal
control in relation to the financial reporting process.

5. Member States may allow or decide that the provisions
laid down in paragraphs 1 to 4 shall not apply to any public-
interest entity that has a body performing equivalent functions
to an audit committee, established and functioning according
to provisions in place in the Member State in which the entity
to be audited is registered.
In such a case the entity shall
disclose which body carries out these functions and how it is
composed.

6. Member States may exempt from the obligation to have
an audit committee:

(a) any public-interest entity which is a subsidiary undertaking
within the meaning of Article 1 of Directive 83/349/EEC if
the entity complies with the requirements in paragraphs 1
to 4 of this Article at group level;

(b) any public-interest entity which is a collective investment
undertaking as defined in Article 1(2) of Directive
85/611/EEC. Member States may also exempt public-in-
terest entities the sole object of which is the collective
investment of capital provided by the public, which operate
on the principle of risk spreading and which do not seek to
take legal or management control over any of the issuers of
its underlying investments, provided that those collective
investment undertakings are authorised and subject
to
supervision by competent authorities and that they have a
depositary exercising functions equivalent to those under
Directive 85/611/EEC;

(c) any public-interest entity the sole business of which is to
act as
issuer of asset-backed securities as defined in
Article 2(5) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 809/
2004 (2). In such instances, the Member State shall require
the entity to explain to the public the reasons for which it
it not appropriate to have either an audit
considers
supervisory body
committee or an administrative or
entrusted to carry out the functions of an audit committee;

(2) OJ L 149, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

L 157/104

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

9.6.2006

(d) any credit institution within the meaning of Article 1(1) of
Directive 2000/12/EC whose shares are not admitted to
trading on a regulated market of any Member State within
the meaning of point 14 of Article 4(1) of Directive
2004/39/EC and which has, in a continuous or repeated
manner, issued only debt securities, provided that the total
nominal amount of all such debt securities remains below
EUR 100 000 000 and that
it has not published a
prospectus under Directive 2003/71/EC.

CHAPTER XI

INTERNATIONAL ASPECTS

Article 44

Approval of auditors from third countries

Article 42

Independence

Subject

to reciprocity,

the competent authorities of a
1.
Member State may approve a third-country auditor as statutory
auditor if
that he or she
complies with requirements equivalent to those laid down in
Articles 4 and 6 to 13.

that person has furnished proof

1.
In addition to the provisions laid down in Articles 22 and
24, Member States shall ensure that statutory auditors or audit
firms that carry out the statutory audit of a public-interest
entity:

2.
The competent authorities of a Member State shall, before
granting approval to a third-country auditor who meets the
requirements of paragraph 1, apply the requirements laid down
in Article 14.

(a) confirm annually in writing to the audit committee their

independence from the audited public-interest entity;

Article 45

(b) disclose annually to the audit committee any additional

services provided to the audited entity; and

Registration and oversight of third-country auditors and
audit entities

(c) discuss with the audit committee the threats to their inde-
pendence and the safeguards applied to mitigate those
threats as documented by them pursuant to Article 22(3).

2. Member States shall ensure that the key audit partner(s)
responsible for carrying out a statutory audit rotate(s) from the
audit engagement within a maximum period of seven years
from the date of appointment and is/are allowed to participate
in the audit of the audited entity again after a period of at least
two years.

3.
The statutory auditor or the key audit partner who carries
out a statutory audit on behalf of an audit firm shall not be
allowed to take up a key management position in the audited
entity before a period of at least two years has elapsed since he
or she resigned as a statutory auditor or key audit partner from
the audit engagement.

Article 43

Quality assurance

The quality assurance review referred to in Article 29 shall be
carried out at least every three years for statutory auditors or
audit firms that carry out statutory audits of public-interest
entities.

entity that provides an audit

1.
in
The competent authorities of a Member State shall,
accordance with Articles 15 to 17, register every third-country
report
auditor and audit
concerning the annual or consolidated accounts of a company
incorporated outwith the Community whose transferable secu-
rities are admitted to trading on a regulated market of that
Member State within the meaning of point 14 of Article 4(1)
of Directive 2004/39/EC, except when the company is an
issuer exclusively of debt securities admitted to trading on a
regulated market in a Member State within the meaning of
Article 2(1)(b) of Directive 2004/109/EC (1) , the denomination
per unit of which is at least EUR 50 000 or, in case of debt
securities denominated in another currency, equivalent, at the
date of issue, to at least EUR 50 000.

2.

Articles 18 and 19 shall apply.

3. Member States shall subject registered third-country audi-
tors and audit entities to their systems of oversight,
their
quality assurance systems and their systems of investigation
and penalties. A Member State may exempt a registered third-
country auditor or audit entity from being subject to its quality
assurance system if another Member State's or third country's
system of quality assurance that has been assessed as equivalent
in accordance with Article 46 has carried out a quality review
of the third-country auditor or audit entity concerned during
the previous three years.

(1) Directive 2004/109/EC of

the European Parliament and of

the
Council of 15 December 2004 on the harmonisation of transpar-
ency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose
securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market (OJ L 390,
31.12.2004, p. 38).

9.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 157/105

4. Without prejudice to Article 46, audit reports concerning
annual accounts or consolidated accounts referred to in para-
graph 1 of this Article issued by third-country auditors or audit
entities that are not registered in the Member State shall have
no legal effect in that Member State.

A Member State may register a third-country audit entity

5.
only if:

(a) it meets requirements which are equivalent to those laid

down in Article 3(3);

(b) the majority of

the members of

the administrative or
management body of the third-country audit entity meet
requirements which are equivalent to those laid down in
Articles 4 to 10;

(c) the third-country auditor carrying out the audit on behalf
of the third-country audit entity meets requirements which
are equivalent to those laid down in Articles 4 to 10;

(d) the audits of the annual or consolidated accounts referred
to in paragraph 1 are carried out in accordance with inter-
national auditing standards as referred to in Article 26, as
well as the requirements laid down in Articles 22, 24 and
25, or with equivalent standards and requirements;

(e) it publishes on its website an annual transparency report
which includes the information referred to in Article 40 or
it complies with equivalent disclosure requirements.

6.
In order to ensure uniform application of paragraph 5(d)
the equivalence referred to therein shall be assessed by the
Commission in cooperation with Member States and shall be
decided upon by the Commission in accordance with the
procedure referred to in Article 48(2). Pending such a decision
by the Commission, Member States may assess the equivalence
referred to in paragraph 5(d) as long as the Commission has
not taken any decision.

Article 46

that

or rely on the assessments carried out by other Member States
as long as the Commission has not taken any decision. If the
Commission decides
the requirement of equivalence
referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article is not complied with,
it may allow the auditors and audit entities concerned to
continue their audit activities in accordance with the relevant
Member State's requirements during an appropriate transitional
period.

3. Member States shall communicate to the Commission:

(a) their assessments of the equivalence referred to in para-

graph 2; and

(b) the main elements of their cooperative arrangements with
third-country systems of public oversight, quality assurance
and investigations and penalties, on the basis of para-
graph 1.

Article 47

Cooperation with competent authorities from third coun-
tries

1. Member States may allow the transfer to the competent
authorities of a third country of audit working papers or other
documents held by statutory auditors or audit firms approved
by them, provided that:

(a) those audit working papers or other documents relate to
audits of companies which have issued securities in that
third country or which form part of a group issuing statu-
tory consolidated accounts in that third country;

(b) the transfer takes place via the home competent authorities
to the competent authorities of that third country and at
their request;

(c) the competent authorities of the third country concerned
meet requirements which have been declared adequate in
accordance with paragraph 3;

Derogation in the case of equivalence

(d) there are working arrangements on the basis of reciprocity

agreed between the competent authorities concerned;

1. Member States may disapply or modify the requirements
in Article 45(1) and (3) on the basis of reciprocity only if the
third-country auditors or audit entities are subject to systems of
public oversight, quality assurance and investigations and
penalties in the third country that meet requirements equivalent
to those of Articles 29, 30 and 32.

2.
In order to ensure uniform application of paragraph 1 of
this Article, the equivalence referred to therein shall be assessed
by the Commission in cooperation with Member States and
shall be decided upon by the Commission in accordance with
the procedure referred to in Article 48(2). Member States may
assess the equivalence referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article

(e) the transfer of personal data to the third country is in

accordance with Chapter IV of Directive 95/46/EC.

The working arrangements referred to in paragraph 1(d)

2.
shall ensure that:

(a) justification as to the purpose of the request

for audit
working papers and other documents is provided by the
competent authorities;

(b) the persons employed or formerly employed by the compe-
tent authorities of the third country that receive the infor-
mation are subject to obligations of professional secrecy;

L 157/106

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

9.6.2006

(c) the competent authorities of the third country may use
audit working papers and other documents only for the
exercise of their functions of public oversight, quality assur-
ance and investigations that meet requirements equivalent
to those of Articles 29, 30 and 32;

(d) the request from a competent authority of a third country
for audit working papers or other documents held by a
statutory auditor or audit firm can be refused:

— where the provision of those working papers or docu-
ments would adversely affect the sovereignty, security
or public order of the Community or of the requested
Member State, or

— where judicial proceedings have already been initiated
in respect of the same actions and against the same
persons before the authorities of the requested Member
State.

3.
The adequacy referred to in paragraph 1(c) shall be
decided upon by the Commission in accordance with the
procedure referred to in Article 48(2)
in order to facilitate
cooperation between competent authorities. The assessment of
adequacy shall be carried out in cooperation with Member
States and be based on the requirements of Article 36 or essen-
tially equivalent functional results. Member States shall take the
measures necessary to comply with the Commission's decision.

4.
In exceptional cases and by way of derogation from para-
graph 1, Member States may allow statutory auditors and audit
firms approved by them to transfer audit working papers and
other documents directly to the competent authorities of a
third country, provided that:

(a) investigations have been initiated by the competent authori-

ties in that third country;

(b) the transfer does not conflict with the obligations with
which statutory auditors and audit firms are required to
comply in relation to the transfer of audit working papers
and other documents to their home competent authority;

(c) there are working arrangements with the competent autho-
rities of that third country that allow the competent autho-
rities in the Member State reciprocal direct access to audit
working papers and other documents of that third-coun-
try's audit entities;

referred to in paragraph 4 of this Article in order to facilitate
cooperation between competent authorities and to ensure the
uniform application of paragraph 4 of this Article.

6. Member States shall communicate to the Commission the
working arrangements referred to in paragraphs 1 and 4.

CHAPTER XII

TRANSITIONAL AND FINAL PROVISIONS

Article 48

Committee procedure

The Commission shall be assisted by a committee (herein-

1.
after referred to as the Committee).

2. Where reference is made to this paragraph Articles 5 and
7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the
provisions of Article 8 thereof.

The period laid down in Article 5(6) of Decision 1999/468/EC
shall be set at three months.

3.

The Committee shall adopt its Rules of Procedure.

its provisions requiring the adoption of

4. Without prejudice to the implementing measures already
adopted, and except for the provisions laid down in Article 26,
upon expiry of a two-year period following the adoption of
this Directive and on 1 April 2008 at the latest, the application
of
technical rules,
amendments and decisions in accordance with paragraph 2
shall be suspended. Acting on a proposal from the Commis-
sion, the European Parliament and the Council may renew the
provisions concerned in accordance with the procedure laid
down in Article 251 of the Treaty and to that end they shall
review them prior to the expiry of the period or date referred
to above.

Article 49

Amendment of Directive 78/660/EEC and Directive
83/349/EEC

(d) the requesting competent authority of the third country
informs in advance the home competent authority of the
statutory auditor or audit firm of each direct request for
information, indicating the reasons therefor;

1.

Directive 78/660/EEC is hereby amended as follows:

(a) in Article 43(1) the following point shall be added:

(e) the conditions referred to in paragraph 2 are respected.

(15)

5.
The Commission may, in accordance with the procedure
referred to in Article 48(2), specify the exceptional cases

fees for

the total

‘separately,

the financial year
charged by the statutory auditor or audit firm for the
fees
statutory audit of annual accounts,
charged for other assurance services, the total fees
charged for tax advisory services and the total fees
charged for other non-audit services.

the total

9.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 157/107

Member States may provide that
this requirement
shall not apply where the company is included within
the consolidated accounts required to be drawn up
under Article 1 of Directive 83/349/EEC, provided
that such information is given in the notes to the
consolidated accounts.’;

(b) paragraph 1 of Article 44 shall be replaced by the

following:

1.
‘Member States may permit the companies referred
to in Article 11 to draw up abridged notes on their
in
accounts
the
Article 43(1)(5) to (12),
notes must
in
Article 43(1)(6) in total for all the items concerned.’;

required
(14)(a) and (15). However,
specified
the

information

information

without

disclose

the

(c) paragraph 2 of Article 45 shall be replaced by the

following:

‘Paragraph 1(b) shall also apply to the information

2.
specified in Article 43(1)(8).

The Member States may permit the companies referred to
in Article 27 to omit disclosure of the information specified
in Article 43(1)(8). The Member States may also permit the
companies referred to in Article 27 to omit disclosure of
the information specified in Article 43(1)(15), provided that
such information is delivered to the public oversight system
referred to in Article 32 of Directive 2006/43/EC of the
European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006
on statutory audit of annual accounts and consolidated
accounts (*) when requested by such a public oversight
system.’

(*) OJ L 157, 9.6.2006, p. 87.

In Article 34 of Directive 83/349/EEC the following point

2.
shall be added:

(16)

the total

‘Separately,

fees for the financial year
charged by the statutory auditor or audit firm for the
statutory audit of the consolidated accounts, the total
fees charged for other assurance services, the total fees
charged for tax advisory services and the total fees
charged for other non-audit services.’

Article 51

Transitional provision

Statutory auditors or audit firms that are approved by the
competent authorities of the Member States in accordance with
Directive 84/253/EEC before the entry into force of the provi-
sions referred to in Article 53(1) shall be considered as having
been approved in accordance with this Directive.

Article 52

Minimum harmonisation

Member States requiring statutory audit may impose more
stringent requirements, unless otherwise provided for by this
Directive.

Article 53

Transposition

1.
Before 29 June 2008 Member States shall adopt and
publish the provisions necessary to comply with this Directive.
They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof.

2. When Member States adopt those provisions, they shall
contain a reference to this Directive or be accompanied by
such a reference on the occasion of their official publication.
The methods of making such reference shall be laid down by
Member States.

3. Member States shall communicate to the Commission the
texts of the main provisions of national law which they adopt
in the field covered by this Directive.

Article 54

Entry into force

This Directive shall enter into force on the 20th day following
its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Article 55

Addressees

This Directive is addressed to the Member States.

Article 50

Repeal of Directive 84/253/EEC

Done at Strasbourg, 17 May 2006.

Directive 84/253/EEC shall be repealed with effect from 29
June 2006. References to the repealed Directive shall be
construed as references to this Directive.

For the European Parliament

For the Council

The President

J. BORRELL FONTELLES

The President

H. WINKLER