Case T-429/03: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of  15 March 2006  — Valero Jordana v Commission (Officials — Appointment — Revision of the classification in grade — Article 31(2) of the Staff Regulations)
Date: 2006-05-06
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, European official, action for annulment (EU), promotion, staff assessment

C 108/18

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

6.5.2006

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 March 2006
— Valero Jordana v Commission

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: J. Currall and V. Joris, acting as Agents)

(Case T-429/03) (1)

(Officials — Appointment — Revision of the classification
in grade — Article 31(2) of the Staff Regulations)

Re:

(2006/C 108/29)

Language of the case: French

Application for annulment of the Commission's decision of 20
December 2002, setting the applicant's final classification at
Grade B3 with effect from 1 March 1988.

Parties

Applicant: Gregorio Valero Jordana (Uccle, Belgium)
sented by: N. Lhoëst and E. De Schietere de Lophem, lawyers)

(repre-

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: V. Joris and C. Berardis-Kayser, acting as Agents,
assisted by D. Waelbroeck, lawyer)

Re:

Application for, primarily, annulment of
the Commission's
decision of 19 December 2002 setting the applicant's final clas-
sification at Grade A7, step 3, and annulment, as far as is
necessary, of the Commission's decision of 9 September 2003
rejecting the applicant's complaint and, as a subsidiary plea, the
production of certain documents.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the action;

2. Orders each party to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 59, 6.3.2004.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Annuls the Commission's decision of 20 December 2002, setting
the applicant's final classification at Grade B3 with effect from 1
March 1988;

2. Orders the Commission to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 59, 6.3.2004.

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 March 2006
— Verborgh v Commission

(Case T-26/04) (1)

(Officials — Appointment — Revision of the classification
in grade — Article 31(2) of the Staff Regulations)

(2006/C 108/31)

Language of the case: French

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 March 2006
— Leite Mateus v Commission

(Case T-10/04) (1)

Parties

Applicant: Jacques Verborgh (Aalter, Belgium) (represented by:
N. Lhoëst and E. De Schietere de Lophem, lawyers)

(Officials — Appointment — Revision of the classification
in grade — Article 31(2) of the Staff Regulations)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: V. Joris and S. Pilette, acting as Agents)

(2006/C 108/30)

Language of the case: French

Re:

Parties

Applicant: Carlos Alberto Leite Mateus (Zaventem, Belgium)
(represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen,
J.-N. Louis and E.
Marchal, lawyers)

Application for, primarily, annulment of
the Commission's
decision of 20 December 2002 setting the applicant's final clas-
sification at Grade A7, step 3, and annulment, as far as is
necessary, of the Commission's decision of 9 October 2003
rejecting the applicant's complaint and, as a subsidiary plea, the
production of certain documents.