Joined Cases T-437/04 and T-441/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of  22 February 2006  — Standertskjöld-Nordenstam and Heyraud v Commission (Officials —  Second round  promotion — 2003 promotion procedure — Failure to include on the list of the officials selected for promotion to Grade A3 — Breach of Article 45 of the Staff Regulations and of the principle of equal treatment)
Date: 2006-04-22
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, European official, action by staff, personnel administration, promotion, regulations for civil servants, staff assessment

C 96/12

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

22.4.2006

Action

brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of
OHIM of 17 December 2003 (Case R 922/2001-2) regarding
opposition proceedings between Société des Produits Nestlé SA
and Quick restaurants SA

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 22 February
2006 — Standertskjöld-Nordenstam and Heyraud v
Commission

(Joined Cases T-437/04 and T-441/04) (1)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. dismisses the action;

2. orders the applicant to pay the costs in their entirety.

(1) OJ C 94, 17.4.2004.

(Officials — ‘Second round’ promotion — 2003 promotion
procedure — Failure to include on the list of the officials
selected for promotion to Grade A3 — Breach of Article 45
of the Staff Regulations and of the principle of equal treat-
ment)

(2006/C 96/23)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 22 February
2006 — Adam v Commission

(Case T-342/04) (1)

(Officials — Remuneration — Expatriation allowance —
Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations —
Definition of 'services carried out for another State')

Standertskjöld-Nordenstam (Waterloo,
Applicants: Holger
lawyer) and Jean-
Belgium)
Claude Heyraud (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by S. Orlandi,
A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

(represented by: T. Demaseure,

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: J. Currall and B. Berscheid, Agents)

(2006/C 96/22)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Herta Adam (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S.
Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: J. Currall and L. Lozano Palacios, Agents)

Application for

Annulment of the Commission's decision of 2 September 2003
refusing the applicant the benefit of the expatriation allowance
provided for by Article 4 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations
of officials of the European Communities

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Dismisses the application;

2. Orders each party to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 262, 23.10.2004.

Application for

Annulment of the Commission's decision not to include the
applicants' names on the list of the officials selected for promo-
tion to Grade A3 in the 'second round' of the 2003 promotion
procedure

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

joins Cases T-437/04 and T-441/04 for the purposes of the
judgment;

2. annuls the decisions of the Commission not to include the appli-
cants' names on the list of the officials selected for promotion to
Grade A3 in the 'second round' of the 2003 promotion procedure;

3. orders the Commission to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 6, 8.1.2005.