Case T-338/04: Order of the Court of First Instance of  16 February 2006  — Centro Europa 7 v Commission (Article 86(3) EC — Rejection of complaint — Action for annulment — Plea of inadmissibility)
Date: 2006-04-22
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, Italy, action for annulment (EU), broadcasting, complaint to the Commission, restriction on competition, television

22.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/13

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 23 February
2006 — Karatzoglou v EAR

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: P. Oliver and F. Amato, Agents)

(Case T-471/04) (1)

(Member of the temporary staff — Termination of contract
— Article 47(2)(a) of the Conditions of Employment of
Other Servants of the European Communities — Observance
of the provisions of the contract — Legitimate expectations)

(2006/C 96/24)

Language of the case: English

Intervener in support of the defendant: Mediaset SpA (Milan, Italy)
(represented by: M. Bay, lawyer)

Application for

Annulment of the Commission's letter of 4 June 2004 [D
(2004) 471] in so far as it rejects the applicant's complaint that
the Italian Republic had infringed the combined provisions of
Articles 86 EC and 82 EC.

Parties

Applicant: Georgios Karatzoglou (Ioannina, Greece), represented
by S. Pappas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Agency for Reconstruction (EAR) (repre-
sented by J.-N. Louis, S. Orlandi, X. Martin and C. Manolo-
poulos, lawyers)

Operative part of the Order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. In addition to bearing its own costs, the applicant is ordered to
pay the costs incurred by the Commission and the intervener.

Application

(1) OJ C 262 of 23.10.2004.

for annulment of the decision of the EAR of 26 February 2004
to terminate the applicant's contract of employment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1. Annuls the decision of the European Agency for Reconstruction
(EAR) of 26 February 2004 terminating the applicant's contract
of employment;

2. Orders the EAR to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 57, 5.3.2005.

Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 17
February 2006 — Nijs v Court of Auditors

(Case T-171/05 RII)

(Proceedings for interim relief — Officials — New action —
Article 109 of the Rules of Procedure — New facts)

(2006/C 96/26)

Language of the case: French

Order of the Court of First Instance of 16 February 2006
— Centro Europa 7 v Commission

(Case T-338/04) (1)

Parties:

Applicant: Bart Nijs (Bereldange, Luxembourg) (represented by:
F. Rollinger, lawyer)

(Article 86(3) EC — Rejection of complaint — Action for
annulment — Plea of inadmissibility)

Defendant: Court of Auditors of the European Communities
(represented by: T. Kennedy,
J.-M. Stenier and G. Corstens,
Agents)

(2006/C 96/25)

Language of the case: Italian

Application for

Parties:

Applicant: Centro Europa 7 Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: V.
Ripa di Meana and R. Mastroianni, lawyers)

Suspension of operation of the Court of Auditors' decision of 2
December 2004 to promote an official other than the applicant
to the post of principal translator at grade LA5 in the Dutch
Section of the Translation Service of the General Secretariat of
the Court of Auditors