do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Regulation (EC) No 598/2006 of  18 April 2006  establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2006-04-18
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: citrus fruit, fruit vegetable, import price, pip fruit

19.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 106/1

I

(Acts whose publication is obligatory)

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 598/2006

of 18 April 2006

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and
vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty
Community,

establishing the European

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of
21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the
fruit and vegetables (1), and in
import arrangements
particular Article 4(1) thereof,

for

Whereas:

standard values for imports from third countries,
in
respect of the products and periods stipulated in the
Annex thereto.

(2)

In compliance with the above criteria,
the standard
import values must be fixed at the levels set out in the
Annex to this Regulation,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regu-
lation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex
hereto.

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 lays down, pursuant to the
outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade nego-
tiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 19 April 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 April 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY
Director-General for Agriculture and
Rural Development

(1) OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regu-

lation (EC) No 386/2005 (OJ L 62, 9.3.2005, p. 3).

L 106/2

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

19.4.2006

to Commission Regulation of 18 April 2006 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry
price of certain fruit and vegetables

ANNEX

CN code

0702 00 00

0707 00 05

0709 10 00

0709 90 70

0805 10 20

0805 50 10

0808 10 80

0808 20 50

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

(EUR/100 kg)

052
204
212
624
999

052
204
999

624
999

052
204
999

052
204
212
220
624
999

624
999

388
400
404
508
512
528
720
804
999

052
388
512
528
720
999

84,0
65,0
139,0
108,6
99,2

117,8
47,4
82,6

119,2
119,2

98,5
54,1
76,3

63,9
29,0
49,5
36,2
68,7
49,5

60,8
60,8

83,1
125,3
90,3
75,2
78,1
79,6
77,8
108,7
89,8

75,0
92,6
106,9
74,8
76,1
85,1

(1) Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 750/2005 (OJ L 126, 19.5.2005, p. 12). Code ‘999’ stands for ‘of

other origin’.
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions at its meeting on given at its 407th meeting on 18 April 2006 concerning a draft decision relating to Case COMP/C.38.620 Hydrogen Peroxide and Perborate
Date: 2006-04-18
Institutions: Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Dominant Positions
Subjects: advisory committee (EU), chemical salt, economic concentration, merger control, opinion (EU), oxide

13.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/25

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions at its meeting
on given at its 407th meeting on 18 April 2006 concerning a draft decision relating to Case
COMP/C.38.620 Hydrogen Peroxide and Perborate

(2006/C 303/18)

1) The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission's assessment of the product and the

geographic area affected by the cartel in the draft decision.

2) The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission's assessment to exclude PCS from the

infringing behaviour.

3) The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission's assessment of the facts as an agree-
ment and/or concerted practice within the meaning of Article 81 of the Treaty and Article 53 of the
EEA Agreement.

4) The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission as regards the assessment of the

leniency applications and their ranking.

5) The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission's draft decision as regards the addres-
sees of the decision, specifically with reference to the imputation of liability to the parent companies of
the groups concerned.

6) The Advisory Committee agrees, with one abstention, with the European Commission's view that the

infringement referred to, constitutes a single and continuous infringement.

7) The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the Euro-

pean Union.

8) The Advisory Committee asks the Commission to take into account all the other points raised during

the discussion.