Case C-105/06: Action brought on  22 February 2006  by the Commission of the European Communities against the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
Date: 2006-04-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Commission, Luxembourg, action for failure to fulfil an obligation, common transport policy, environmental protection, national implementing measure, security of supply, substitute fuel

8.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/21

Action brought on 21 February 2006 by the Commission
of the European Communities against the French Republic

Action brought on 22 February 2006 by the Commission
of the European Communities against the Grand Duchy of
Luxembourg

(Case C-101/06)

(2006/C 86/40)

(Language of the case: French)

(Case C-105/06)

(2006/C 86/41)

(Language of the case: French)

An action against the French Republic was brought before the
Court of Justice of the European Communities on 21 February
2006 by the Commission of the European Communities, repre-
sented by B. Stromsky, acting as Agent, with an address for
service in Luxembourg.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

1. declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and
administrative provisions necessary to comply with Direc-
tive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the
Council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws,
regulations and administrative provisions of the Member
States relating to the implementation of good clinical prac-
tice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products
for human use, (1) the French Republic has failed to fulfil its
obligations under that directive;

2. declare that, in any event, by failing to inform the Commis-
sion of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions
necessary to comply with Directive 2001/20/EC of
the
European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on
the approximation of the laws, regulations and administra-
tive provisions of the Member States relating to the imple-
mentation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical
trials on medicinal products for human use, the French
Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that direc-
tive;

3. order the French Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposing Directive 2001/20/EC expired on
30 April 2003.

(1) OJ 2001 L 121, p. 34.

An action against
the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg was
brought before the Court of Justice of the European Commu-
nities on 22 February 2006 by the Commission of the Euro-
pean Communities, represented by B. Schima and J. Hottiaux,
acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

1. declare that by failing to bring into force the laws, regula-
tions and administrative provisions necessary to comply
with Directive 2003/30/EC of the European Parliament and
of the Council of 8 May 2003 on the promotion of the use
of biofuels or other renewable fuels for transport (1) the
Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obliga-
tions under that Directive;

2. order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for implementing Directive 2003/30/EC
ended on 31 December 2004.

(1) OJ 2003 L 123, p. 42.

Action brought on 22 February 2006 by the Commission
of the European Communities against the Grand Duchy of
Luxembourg

(Case C-106/06)

(2006/C 86/42)

(Language of the case: French)

An action against
the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg was
brought before the Court of Justice of the European Commu-
nities on 22 February 2006 by the Commission of the Euro-
pean Communities, represented by B. Schima and J Hottiaux,
acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg.