Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of  25 October 2005  in Joined Cases C-465/02 and C-466/02: Federal Republic of Germany and Kingdom of Denmark v Commission of the European Communities (Agriculture — Geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs — The name  feta  — Regulation (EC) No 1829/2002 — Validity)
Date: 2006-04-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Commission, Germany, action for annulment (EU), cheese, designation of origin, location of production, product designation

8.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/1

I

(Information)

COURT OF JUSTICE

COURT OF JUSTICE

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Grand Chamber)

of 25 October 2005

2. Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs in rela-
tion to Case C-465/02 and the Kingdom of Denmark to pay the
costs in relation to Case C-466/02;

3. Orders the Hellenic Republic, the French Republic and the United
Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear their own
costs.

in Joined Cases C-465/02 and C-466/02: Federal Republic
of Germany and Kingdom of Denmark v Commission of
the European Communities (1)

(1) OJ C 55, 08.03.2003.

(Agriculture — Geographical indications and designations of
origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs — The name
‘feta’ — Regulation (EC) No 1829/2002 — Validity)

(2006/C 86/01)

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Language of the cases: German and Danish)

applicant

In Joined Cases C-465/02 and C-466/02: Federal Republic of
Germany (represented by: W.-D. Plessing, Agent, assisted by M.
Loschelder, Rechtsanwalt)
in Case C-465/02;
Kingdom of Denmark (represented by: J. Molde and J. Bering
Liisberg, Agents) applicant in Case C-466/02, supported by:
French Republic, (represented by: G. de Bergues and A. Colomb,
Agents), United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
(represented by: C. Jackson, Agent) v Commission of the Euro-
pean Communities (represented by: J.L. Iglesias Buhigues and
H. C. Støvlbæk, and A. M. Rouchaud-Joët and S. Grünheid,
Agents)
supported by: Hellenic Republic (represented by:
V. Kontolaimos and I.-K. Chalkias, Agents) — applications for
annulment pursuant
to Article 230 EC, brought on 30
December 2002 — the Court (Grand Chamber), composed of
V. Skouris, President, P. Jann, C.W.A. Timmermans, A. Rosas
and J. Malenovský, Presidents of Chambers, J. P. Puissochet, R.
Schintgen, N. Colneric, S. von Bahr,
J.N. Cunha Rodrigues
(Rapporteur), J. Klučka, U. Lõhmus and E. Levits, Judges; D.
Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; K. Sztranc, Adminis-
trator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 25 October 2005,
in which it:

1. Dismisses the actions;

(Third Chamber)

of 27 October 2005

in Case C-234/03: Reference for a preliminary ruling from
the Audiencia Nacional in Contse SA and Others v Insti-
tuto Nacional de Gestión Sanitaria (Ingesa), formerly Insti-
tuto Nacional de la Salud (Insalud) (1)

(Freedom of establishment — Freedom to provide services —
Directive 92/50/EEC — Public service contracts — Principle
of non-discrimination — Health services of home respiratory
treatments — Admission condition — Evaluation criteria)

(2006/C 86/02)

(Language of the case: Spanish)

In Case C-234/03: reference for a preliminary ruling under
Article 234 EC from the Audiencia Nacional (Spain), made by
decision of 16 April 2003, received at the Court on 2 June
2003,
in the proceedings between Contse SA, Vivisol Srl,
Oxigen Salud SA and Instituto Nacional de Gestión Sanitaria