European Parliament resolution on aid effectiveness and corruption in developing countries (2005/2141(INI))
Date: 2006-04-06
Institutions: European Parliament
Subjects: EU aid, EU financing, corruption, developing countries, development aid, financial control

C 293 E/316

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

2.12.2006

Thursday 6 April 2006

Calls on the members of the JPA and the European co-secretariat to do everything they can to

29.
strengthen the role and the position of the JPA within the European Parliament;

Encourages all political groups to avoid the use of votes by separate houses in order to foster the

30.
sense of solidarity and cohesiveness of the JPA;

Calls on the members of the JPA to continue their activities in line with the progress achieved since

31.
2004;

32. Welcomes the fact that JPA documents are rapidly made available on the Internet, which is an indis-
pensable tool for the smooth running of the JPA, whose members are situated far apart from each other;
calls on the JPA and the two co-secretariats to make systematic use of electronic mail and the Internet to
send documents to parliamentarians and actively to encourage Internet use where available;

33.
Calls for close cooperation between European and African parliamentarians and an exchange pro-
gramme between European Parliament officials and officials of the Pan-African Parliament in order to build
up their capacities;

34.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the ACP-EU Council, the ACP-EU Joint Parlia-
mentary Assembly, the parliaments of the ACP countries and of the Member States of the European Union,
the Scottish Parliament and Executive, the Mayor of Edinburgh and the Commission.

P6_TA(2006)0141

Aid effectiveness and corruption in developing countries

European Parliament resolution on aid effectiveness and corruption in developing countries (2005/
2141(INI))

The European Parliament,

— having regard to the Joint statement by the Council and the representatives of the governments of the
Member States meeting within the Council, the European Parliament and the Commission on European
Union Development Policy: ‘The European Consensus’ (1),

— having regard to the UN Convention against Corruption of 31 October 2003,

— having regard to the UN Declaration against Corruption and Bribery in International Commercial

Transactions of 16 December 1996,

— having regard the OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International

Business Transactions of 21 November 1997,

— having regard to the UN Millennium Declaration of 8 September 2000, which sets out the Millennium
Development Goals (MDGs) as objectives established jointly by the international community for the
elimination of poverty,

— having regard to the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness of 2 March 2005,

— having regard to the Fourth Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Report of 12 July 2005 entitled ‘Eco-

systems and Human Well-being: Opportunities and Challenges for Business and Industry’,

— having regard to Articles 8, 9 and 97 of the Partnership Agreement between the members of the
African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States of the one part, and the European Community and its
Member States, of the other part, signed in Cotonou on 23 June 2000 (2),

(1) OJ C 46, 24.2.2006, p. 1.
(2) OJ L 317, 15.12.2000, p. 3.

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 293 E/317

Thursday 6 April 2006

— having regard to the Declaration by the G8 Summit in Evian on Fighting Corruption and Improving

Transparency of 2 June 2003,

— having regard to the Report of the Commission for Africa of 11 March 2005 entitled ‘Our Common

Interest’,

— having regard to the EU strategy to combat the illicit accumulation and trafficking of small arms and
light weapons (SALW) and their ammunition adopted by the European Council of 15-16 December
2005;

— having regard to its resolution of 15 May 2003 on Capacity-building in the developing countries (1),

— having regard to its resolution of 31 March 2004 on Governance in the European Union's development

policy (2),

— having regard to Rule 45 of its Rules of Procedure,

— having regard to the report of the Committee on Development (A6-0048/2006),

A. whereas corruption hurts the poor disproportionately, restricting their access to public goods and

lowering the quality of basic services, making it more difficult to escape the poverty spiral,

B. whereas corruption has a negative impact on the business climate, the effectiveness of public service

provision and the public's trust in their government,

C. whereas corruption obstructs aid effectiveness and therefore undermines the development goals of the

EU and slows down the pace of development in the EU's partner countries,

D. whereas the World Bank estimates that more than USD 1 000 000 000 000 is paid in bribes every year
throughout the world and the African Union estimates that corruption costs African economies more
than 25 % of Africa's GDP annually,

E. whereas corruption is a problem affecting society as a whole and takes many forms and a ‘one size fits
all’ strategy does not apply, as corruption can only be permanently eliminated through a broad
approach,

F. whereas numerous players, including politicians, government officials, civil society, the media, multi-

nationals and international donors, can play a role in the fight against corruption,

G. whereas corruption is both one of the causes and one of the consequences of conflict situations,

H. whereas corruption is a threat to basic human needs, such as access to health and education,

I. whereas corruption is a by-product of weak governance, inextricably linked to the role of the State, and

should therefore be fought by strategies promoting good governance,

J. whereas transparency and accountability are key principles in the fight against corruption,

K. whereas due attention should be given to the link between the illicit manufacture, transfer and circu-

lation of SALW and corruption practices in both developing and developed countries,

L. whereas curbing corruption is impossible without the awareness and participation of civil society and

whereas access to all the information is crucial in this process,

(1) OJ C 67 E, 17.3.2004, p. 255.
(2) OJ C 103 E, 29.4.2004, p. 550.

C 293 E/318

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

2.12.2006

Thursday 6 April 2006

M. whereas the 2003 UN Convention Against Corruption is the first international

legal instrument to
recognise the need for all States to commit to asset repatriation, and whereas the only EU Member
States that have ratified this Convention are Hungary and France,

N. whereas the 1997 OECD Convention may be signed only by OECD Member States or full participants

in the OECD Working Group on Bribery in International Business Transactions;

1.
Calls on the Commission to focus more specifically, in designing its development programmes, on
issues of accountability and transparency, as weak accountability mechanisms tend to facilitate corruption;

Stresses that increased attention should be paid to the role of civil society in fostering good govern-

2.
ance and voluntary control of corruption;

Recalls that under the amended Cotonou Partnership Agreement serious cases of corruption can lead

3.
to consultations in accordance with Articles 96 and 97 of the Agreement;

Stresses the need to support national parliaments in developing countries in their work as budget

4.
authorities by means of dialogue, information-sharing and capacity-building;

Stresses the important role that a free and independent media can play in the fight against corruption

5.
and calls for greater EU support for projects assisting or strengthening such media in partner countries;

6.

Stresses the need to contribute to building and strengthening the legal system in those countries;

7.
Underlines the important role played by women also in the fight against corruption and emphasises
therefore the need for more and better education of women and girls and for promoting of the involvement
of women in politics;

Supports the ‘Publish What You Pay’ campaign that calls for multinationals to disclose information

8.
about payments to governments;

Stresses the importance of investment in the developing countries and encourages the Commission

9.
and the Member States to assist the flow of such investment;

10.
Stresses the importance of the establishment of watchdogs by civil society in developing countries,
requiring a system of checks and balances of their government; calls on the Commission to support this
process by reserving an appropriate percentage of budget aid for civil society watchdogs;

11.
Considers that the internal organisation often has to change in order to tackle corruption; emphasises
the need for capacity-building in central and local institutions to combat corruption, especially in the light
of the increase in aid given in the form of budget aid;

Stresses that the granting of budget aid must always be carefully preceded by fiduciary risk assess-

12.
ments on a case-by-case basis;

13.

Stresses that budget aid should always be earmarked for a specific sector;

14.
Emphasises that any budget aid that is granted should be accompanied by a policy dialogue aimed at
improving Public Financial Management (PFM), reducing the risk of corruption or mismanagement of funds;

15.
Calls for more transparency in programmes for budget aid granted by the EU, including publication
of the relevant information about the aid spent in the recipient country, and by involving parliaments and
informing civil players in this process;

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 293 E/319

Thursday 6 April 2006

16.
Calls for support for efficient budget tracking through Public Expenditure Tracking Surveys (PETS) by
civil society and national parliaments which clearly measures ‘inputs’ against ‘outputs’ under the OECD's
Development Assistance Committee (DAC) criteria;

17.
Considers that specific social indicators should be devised for the purpose of obtaining more precise
data on the quality of governance achieved by the countries in question and calls for civil society to be more
extensively involved in this area;

18.
Calls on the EU, as co-chair of the Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability Programme
(PEFA), which provides a harmonized framework for assessing fiduciary risk in recipient countries, to
include specific indicators to measure the level of corruption;

Calls on the Commission to use these levels of corruption as tracked to support good governance

19.
and take adequate measures against corrupt regimes;

20.

Urges the Commission to consider decisions to reduce the external debt of developing countries;

Stresses the need for international donors closely to coordinate their activities in the field of budget

21.
aid with a view to enhancing transparency and accountability in the recipient country;

22.
Urges all Member States as well as all countries signatories to the 2003 UN Convention against
Corruption to ratify the Convention and the 1997 OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign
Public Officials in International Business Transactions;

23.
Invites the Members of the OECD to consider the possibility of admitting Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania
and Malta as full participants in the Working Group on Bribery in International Business Transactions,
which would allow them to sign and ratify the 1997 OECD Convention and invites these countries, in the
meantime, to seek wider participation in the Revised Recommendation of the OECD Ministerial Council of
23 May 1997 on Combating Bribery in International Business Transactions;

24.
Recalls the important role of regional initiatives in curbing corruption and promoting good govern-
ance such as the African Peer Review Mechanism; underlines the need for African countries to implement
these initiatives and for the Commission and the Member States to provide technical and financial assistance
for this purpose;

Calls on Member States to promote a legally binding international instrument on the tracing and the
25.
marking of SALW and ammunition as soon as possible, as well as to support regional initiatives to combat
the illicit trade in SALW and their ammunition in the developing countries;

Calls for further enforcement of and commitment to the ‘Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative’
26.
in order to ensure the disclosure of information about payments between governments of developing coun-
tries and multinationals;

Calls on Member States with financial centres to take all necessary legal and administrative action to
27.
ensure that illicitly acquired funds can be repatriated to the State of origin; stresses furthermore the need for
capacity-building, concentrating on preventing the theft of assets and the misuse and misappropriation of
public funds;

28.
Urges the Commission and the Member States to establish an international system of blacklisting to
prevent banks from lending large sums of money to corrupt regimes or individuals representing a govern-
ment;

29.
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to ban public purchasing or procurement contracts
with companies whose employees have been involved in corrupt activities with government ministers or
officials or in any other way within a developing country, if those employees are not subject to disciplinary
proceedings; further calls on the Member States to refer such cases to the appropriate prosecution auth-
orities, so that such people will be investigated and brought to trial, if they have a case to answer;

C 293 E/320

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

2.12.2006

Thursday 6 April 2006

Stresses that there are major corruption risks involved in public procurement procedures and that,

30.
consequently, transparent procurement rules and procedures should be promoted as a key priority;

31.

Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and the Commission.

P6_TA(2006)0142

Darfur

The European Parliament,

European Parliament resolution on Darfur

— having regard to its previous resolutions on the subject, including that of 16 September 2004 on the
Darfur region in Sudan (1), and ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly Resolution ACP-EU 3777/05 of
21 April 2005 on the situation in Sudan (2),

— having regard to the communiqué of the Peace and Security Council of the African Union of 10 March

2006,

— having regard to the Humanitarian Ceasefire Agreement of 8 April 2004,

— having regard to the mandate of the African Union Mission in Sudan, which was extended in October

2004,

— having regard to the ongoing peace talks being held in Abuja,

— having regard to the findings of its missions in February 2004 and August/September 2004 and the

findings of the ACP-EU mission of March 2005,

— having regard to Rule 115(5) of its Rules of Procedure,

A. whereas, in his report to the UN Security Council, Jan Pronk stated that killing, rape and abuses of
human rights continue in Darfur, with rape and sexual violence continuing unabated both within and
outside IDP camps,

B. whereas the ceasefire in the region is not being respected, whereas rebels belonging to the Sudanese
Liberation Army (SLA) have increased their ceasefire violations and whereas Justice and Equality Move-
ment (JEM) rebels have said that they will ask for self-determination for the region unless a solution to
the conflict can be reached soon,

C. whereas the Government of Sudan continues to actively support the Janjaweed militia, not only by
arming the gangs but also through direct participation in attacks on villages with support vehicles (3),
and whereas there are eye-witness reports of government helicopter fire (4),

D. whereas the African Union Mission in Sudan has been extended until 30 September 2006, after which

the international presence will be directly guaranteed by the UN,

E. whereas the Government of Sudan has said that such a UN operation would amount to colonialism and

has threatened to leave the African Union if that were to happen,

(1) OJ C 140 E, 9.6.2005, p. 153.
(2) OJ C 272, 3.11.2005, p. 43.
(3) As documented in the African Union Ceasefire Commission's Ceasefire Violation Report number 96/05 on the
alleged GoS attack on Umm Zoor market on 16 July 2005, which concluded that the ceasefire violation was com-
mitted by the Janjaweed and Government of Sudan forces.

(4) As documented in the latest report of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) on Sudan,

published on 27 January 2006, pp. 10-11.