Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of  24 November 2005  in Case C-5/05 SA: Maria Fernanda Gil do Nascimento and Others v Commission of the European Communities (Application for authorisation to serve a garnishee order on the Commission of the European Communities)
Date: 2006-03-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: excise duty, free movement of goods, interpretation of the law, tax system

11.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/13

made by decision of 30 September 2004, received at the Court
on 27 October 2004, in the proceedings between Autohaus
Ostermann GmbH and VAV Versicherungs AG — the Court
of C.W.A. Timmermans
(Second Chamber),
(Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, R. Schintgen, R. Silva
de Lapuerta, G. Arestis and J. Klučka,, Judges; P. Léger, Advo-
cate General; R. Grass, Registrar, made an order on 1 December
2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

composed

(OHIM),

Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
(Agent: G.
Schneider), Krafft SA, established in Andoain (Spain) (repre-
sented by P. Koch Moreno, abogada) — an appeal under
Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice, brought on 14
December 2004, the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of K.
Schiemann, President of the Chamber, M. Ilešič (Rapporteur)
and E. Levits, Judges; F. G. Jacobs, Advocate General; R. Grass,
Registrar, made an order on 1 December 2005, the operative
part of which is as follows

Article 4(6) of Directive 2000/26/EC of the European Parliament
and of the Council of 16 May 2000 on the approximation of the
laws of the Member States relating to insurance against civil liability
in respect of the use of motor vehicles and amending Council Direc-
tives 73/239/EEC and 88/357/EEC (fourth motor insurance Direc-
tive)
is to be interpreted as not precluding a national rule from
allowing an injured party to bring a legal action against the insurance
undertaking within the three-month period set down by that provision,
after the setting of a reasonable period for payment.

(1) OJ C 314, 18.12.2004.

1. The appeal is dismissed;

2. Vitakraft-Werke Wührmann & Sohn GmbH & Co. KG shall pay

the costs, including those of the interim proceedings.

(1) OJ C 45 of 19.02.2005

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 1 December 2005

in Case C-512/04 P Vitakraft-Werke Wührmann & Sohn
GmbH & Co. KG v Office for Harmonisation in the
Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), Krafft
SA (1)

(Appeal — Community trade mark — Article 8(1)(b) of
Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Likelihood of confusion —
Application for Community word mark VITAKRAFT —
Opposition from the proprietor of national marks containing
the word element ‘krafft’ — Similarity between marks —
Appeal manifestly inadmissible)

(2006/C 60/27)

(Language of the case: German)

In Case C-512/04 P: Vitakraft-Werke Wührmann & Sohn
GmbH & Co. KG, established in Bremen (Germany) (repre-
sented by U. Sander, Rechtsanwalt), the other parties to the
proceedings being: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Third Chamber)

of 24 November 2005

in Case C-5/05 SA: Maria Fernanda Gil do Nascimento and
Others v Commission of the European Communities (1)

(Application for authorisation to serve a garnishee order on
the Commission of the European Communities)

(2006/C 60/28)

(Language of the case: Portuguese)

In Case C-5/05 SA: Maria Fernanda Gil do Nascimento and
J. Grilo Simões) against Commission of the
Others (lawyer:
European Communities (Agents: I. Martinez del Peral Cagigal
and P. Guerra e Andrade) — application for authorisation to
serve a garnishee order on the Commission of the European
Communities, brought on 11 March 2005, the Court (Third
Chamber), composed of A. Rosas, President of the Chamber, J.
Malenovský (Rapporteur), A. La Pergola, A. Borg Barthet and
A. Ó Caoimh,
Judges; C. Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; R.
Grass, Registrar, made an order on 24 November 2005, the
operative part of which is as follows:

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the matter.

C 60/14

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

11.3.2006

2. Ms Gil do Nascimento, Mr Sirolla, Ms Leão Pingo Barata, Mr
Vera Pedro, Mr Fontes, Ms Florindo Mestre, Ms Coutinho
Martins, Mr do Nascimento Neves, Mr Rodrigues Paula, Ms
the European
Teixeira dos Santos and the Commission of
Communities shall bear their own costs.

The reference for a preliminary ruling made by the Tribunal de
commerce de Nancy by decision of 14 February 2005 is manifestly
inadmissible.

(1) OJ C 115 of 14.05.2005.

(1) OJ C 106, 30.04.2005.

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Sixth Chamber)

of 1 December 2005

in Case C-116/05: Reference for a preliminary ruling from
the Tribunal de commerce de Nancy in Etablissements
Dhumeaux et Cie SA, Société d'études et de commerce
(SEC) v ALVBV SA, ALBV SA v Tragex Gel SA, Agence
fédérale pour la sécurité de la chaîne alimentaire (AFSCA),
formerly Institut d'expertise vétérinaire (IEV), ALBV SA v
CIGMA International SA and ALBV SA v Jean Max Gustin
in his capacity as administrator of Tragex Gel SA (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling — Inadmissibility)

(2006/C 60/29)

(Language of the case: French)

In Case C-116/05: reference for a preliminary ruling under
Article 234 EC from the Tribunal de commerce de Nancy
(France), made by decision of 14 February 2005, received at
in the proceedings between
the Court on 10 March 2005,
Etablissements Dhumeaux et Cie SA, Société d'études et
de commerce (SEC) and ALVBV SA, between ALBV SA
and Tragex Gel SA, Agence fédérale pour la sécurité de la
chaîne alimentaire (AFSCA), formerly Institut d'expertise
vétérinaire (IEV), between ALBV SA and CIGMA Interna-
tional SA and between ALBV SA and Jean Max Gustin in
his capacity as administrator of Tragex Gel SA, the Court
(Sixth Chamber), composed of J. Malenovský, President of the
Chamber, A. La Pergola (Rapporteur) and J.-P. Puissochet,
Judges; F. G.
Jacobs, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar,
made an order on 1 December 2005, the operative part of
which is as follows:

ORDER OF THE COURT

(Fifth Chamber)

of 2 December 2005

in Case C-117/05: Reference for a preliminary ruling from
the Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat of the Landes Oberös-
terreich in Manfred Seidl v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gries-
kirchen (1)

(Article 104(3), first subparagraph, of the Rules of Procedure
— Freedom of movement for persons — Article 43 EC —
Establishment of a driving school)

(2006/C 60/30)

(Language of the case: German)

In Case C-117/05: reference for a preliminary ruling under
Article 234 EC from the Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat des
Landes Oberösterreich (Austria), made by decision of 4 March
2005, received at the Court on 10 March 2005, in the proceed-
ings between Manfred Seidl and Bezirkshauptmannschaft Gries-
kirchen — the Court
J.
Makarczyk, President of the Chamber, R. Silva de Lapuerta
(Rapporteur) and J. Klucka,
Judges; A. Tizzano, Advocate
General; R. Grass, Registrar, made an order on 2 December
2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

(Fifth Chamber), composed of

Article 43 EC must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a
Member State which prohibits the issue of a driving-school permit to
a person who already holds a permit for the same purpose.

(1) OJ C 155, 25.06.2005