Case C-48/06: Action brought on  30 January 2006  by the Commission of the European Communities against the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
Date: 2006-03-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Commission, Luxembourg, action for failure to fulfil an obligation, fight against crime, illegal migration, organised crime

11.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/31

The Commission claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

1. declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and
administrative
comply with
provisions necessary
Commission Directive 2002/31/EC of 22 March 2002
implementing Council Directive 92/75/EEC with regard to
energy labelling of household air-conditioners (1) or, in any
event, by failing to communicate those provisions to the
Commission, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to
fulfil its obligations under that dircetive;

to

2. order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for transposition of Directive 2002/31 expired on
31 December 2002.

(1) OJ L 86 of 03.04.2002, p. 26

The period prescribed for transposing Directive 2003/9/EC
expired on 6 February 2005.

(1) OJ L 31 of 06.02.2003, p. 18.

Action brought on 30 January 2006 by the Commission of
the European Communities against the Grand Duchy of
Luxembourg

(Case C-48/06)

(2006/C 60/61)

(Language of the case: French)

Action brought on 30 January 2006 by the Commission of
the European Communities against the Grand Duchy of
Luxembourg

(Case C-47/06)

(2006/C 60/60)

(Language of the case: French)

the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg was
An action against
brought before the Court of Justice of the European Commu-
nities on 30 January 2006 by the Commission of the European
Communities, represented by C. O'Reilly, acting as Agent, with
an address for service in Luxembourg.

An action against
the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg was
brought before the Court of Justice of the European Commu-
nities on 30 January 2006 by the Commission of the European
Communities, represented by C. O'Reilly, acting as Agent, with
an address for service in Luxembourg.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

1. declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and
administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council
Directive 2002/90/EC of 28 November 2002 defining the
facilitation of unauthorised entry, transit and residence, (1)
and,
in any event, by not informing the Commission of
their adoption, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed
to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

2. order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

The Commission claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

1. declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and
administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council
Directive 2003/9/EC of 27 January 2003 laying down
minimum standards for asylum seekers, (1) or, in any event,
by not informing the Commission thereof, the Grand Duchy
of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that
directive;

2. order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

The period prescribed for implementing Directive 2002/90/EC
expired on 4 December 2004.

(1) OJ L 328 of 5.12.2002, p. 17.