Case C-437/05: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Okresní Soud, Český Krumlov, by order of that court of  28 November 2005  in Jan Vorel v Český Krumlov Hospital
Date: 2006-02-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: interpretation of the law, labour law, organisation of work, physician, working time

11.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/25

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Okresní Soud,
Český Krumlov, by order of that court of 28 November
2005 in Jan Vorel v Český Krumlov Hospital

culture, Food, Fisheries and Rural Affairs) on the following
questions:

(Case C-437/05)

(2006/C 36/50)

(Language of the case: Czech)

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the Euro-
the Okresní Soud (District
pean Communities by order of
Court), Český Krumlov, of 28 November 2005, received at the
Court Registry on 5 December 2005, for a preliminary ruling
in the proceedings between Jan Vorel and Český Krumlov
Hospital on the following question:

From the point of view of
conformity with Directive
93/104/EC (1) and the judgment of the Court of Justice of the
European Communities in Case C-151/02 Stadt Kiel v Norbert
Jäger, is a doctor's waiting for work when on call at his place of
work in the hospital to be regarded as the performance of
work?

(1) OJ L 307, p. 18

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour adminis-
trative d'appel de Douai by judgment of that court of 1
December 2005 in Roquette Frères v Ministre de l'Agricul-
ture, de l'Alimentation, de la Pêche et de la Ruralité

(Case C-441/05)

(2006/C 36/51)

(Language of the case: French)

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the Euro-
pean Communities by judgment of the Cour administrative
d'appel de Douai (Administrative Court of Appeal, Douai) of 1
the Court Registry on 12
December 2005,
December 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings
between Roquette Frères and Ministre de l'agriculture, de l'ali-
mentation, de la pêche et de la ruralité (Minister for Agri-

received at

1. Could Roquette Frères undoubtedly have mounted an admis-
sible challenge directly before it to the legality of Article
24(2) of Regulation No 1785/81 (1), Article 27(3) of Regu-
lation No 2038/1999 (2), Article 1 of Regulation No
2073/2000 (3),
No
11(2)
1260/2001 (4), Article 1 of Regulation No 1745/2002 (5)
and Article 1 of Regulation No 1739/2003 (6)?

Regulation

Article

of

2. If Roquette Frères can admissibly plead the illegality of those
provisions, are Article 24(2) of Regulation No 1785/81,
Article 27(3) of Regulation No 2038/1999, Article 1 of
Regulation No 2073/2000, Article 11(2) of Regulation No
1260/2001, Article 1 of Regulation No 1745/2002 and
Article 1 of Regulation No 1739/2003 valid inasmuch as
they set the maximum basic quantities of isoglucose produc-
tion for metropolitan France without taking into account
the isoglucose produced in that Member State between 1
November 1978 and 30 April 1979 as an intermediate
product used in the manufacture of other products intended
for sale.

(1) Council Regulation (EEC) No 1785/81 of 30 June 1981 on the
common organization of the markets in the sugar sector (OJ 1981
L 177, p. 4)

(2) Council Regulation (EC) No 2038/1999 of 13 September 1999 on
the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (OJ
1999 L 252, p. 1)

(3) Commission Regulation (EC) No 2073/2000 of 29 September 2000
reducing, for the 2000/2001 marketing year, the guaranteed quan-
tity under the production quotas scheme for the sugar sector and
the presumed maximum supply needs of sugar refineries under the
preferential import arrangements (OJ 2000 L 246, p. 38)

(4) Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the
common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (OJ 2001 L
178, p. 1)

(5) Commission Regulation (EC) No 1745/2002 of 30 September 2002
reducing, for the 2002/2003 marketing year, the guaranteed quan-
tity under the production quotas scheme for the sugar sector and
the presumed maximum supply needs of sugar refineries under the
preferential import arrangements (OJ 2002 L 263, p. 31)

(6) Commission Regulation (EC) No 1739/2003 of 30 September 2003
reducing, for the 2003/2004 marketing year, the guaranteed quan-
tity under the production quotas for the sugar sector and the
presumed maximum supply needs of sugar refineries under prefer-
ential imports (OJ 2003 L 249, p. 38)