Case T-321/04: Order of the Court of First Instance of  19 September 2005  — Air Bourbon v Commission (State aid — Decision to raise no objections — Action for annulment — Time-limit for bringing an action — Publication of a summary notice — Not admissible)
Date: 2005-12-24
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, France, Réunion, State aid, action for annulment (EU), air transport, restriction on competition, tax relief

24.12.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 330/23

Order of the Court of First Instance of 19 September 2005
— Air Bourbon v Commission

Other party/parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:
Budějovický Budvar, národní podnik (České Budějovice, Czech
Republic)

(Case T-321/04) (1)

(State aid — Decision to raise no objections — Action for
annulment — Time-limit for bringing an action — Publica-
tion of a summary notice — Not admissible)

(2005/C 330/56)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Form of order sought

— Partially annul the decision of the Board of Appeal of the
Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market
(Trade
Marks and Designs) of 11 July 2005 (Case R 514/2004-2),
namely insofar as the application was rejected for goods in
class 33, and

— Order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the

defendant.

Applicant(s): Air Bourbon SAS (Sainte-Marie, island of Réunion,
France) (represented by: S. Vaisse, lawyer)

Pleas in law and main arguments

Defendant(s): Commission of the European Communities (repre-
sented by: C. Giolito and J. Buendía Sierra, Agents)

Application for

annulment of the Commission Decision (C(2003) 4708 final)
of 16 December 2003 to raise no objections against aid
N 427/2003 granted by the French authorities to Air Austral

Operative part of the Order

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

2. There is no need to adjudicate on Air Austral's application for

leave to intervene;

3. The applicant is ordered to pay the costs.

(1) OJ C 262, 23.10.2004.

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘BUDWEISER’
for goods in classes 32 and 33 — application No 1 603 489

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:
Budějovický Budvar, národní podnik

Mark or sign cited: The international figurative marks and word
mark ‘BUDWEISER’ and ‘BUDWEISER BUDVAR’ for goods in
classes 31 and 32

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld for all the
contested goods

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regu-
lation No 40/94 as there is no likelihood of confusion between
the conflicting marks. The goods are sufficiently dissimilar to
exclude any confusion on the part of the consumer.

Action brought on 26 September 2005 — Anheuser-
Busch/OHIM

(Case T-366/05)

(2005/C 330/57)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Action brought on 19 October 2005 — I.R.I.P.A. Abruzzo
v Commission

(Case T-384/05)

(2005/C 330/58)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant(s): Anheuser-Busch, Inc. (St. Louis, USA) [represented
by: V. von Bomhard, A. Renck, A. Pohlmann, G. Burkhart,
lawyers]

Parties

Applicant(s): Istituto Regionale per gli Interventi Promozionali
in Agricoltura (Regional Institute for the Promotion of Agri-
culture) — I.R.I.P.A. Abruzzo (Pescara, Italy) (represented by:
Gianluca Belotti, Nicola Pisani and Emanuele Dell' Elce,
lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market
(Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant(s): Commission of the European Communities