Case T-270/05: Action brought on 8 July 2005 by Matthias Ghem against the Commission of the European Communities
Date: 2005-09-17
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Commission, action by staff, contract staff, pay, personnel administration

17.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 229/31

— order

the defendant

to pay EUR 25 000 by way of
damages, subject to an increase or decrease or further speci-
fications;

— order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are identical to those put
forward in Case T-253/05 Fernandez Tunon v Commission.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are identical to those put
forward in Case T-253/05 Fernandez Tunon v Commission.

Action brought on 8 July 2005 by Miriam Arana de la Cal
against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case T-271/05)

(2005/C 229/67)

Action brought on 8 July 2005 by Matthias Ghem against
the Commission of the European Communities

(Language of the case: French)

(Case T-270/05)

(2005/C 229/66)

An action against the Commission of the European Commu-
nities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the
European Communities on 8 July 2005 by Miriam Arana de la
Cal, resident in Saint-Gilles (Belgium), represented Lucas Vogel,
lawyer.

(Language of the case: French)

The applicant claims that the Court should:

An action against the Commission of the European Commu-
nities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the
European Communities on 8 July 2005 by Matthias Ghem,
resident in Woluwé-Saint-Pierre (Belgium), represented Lucas
Vogel, lawyer.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

— annul the decision adopted by the Authority Responsible
for Concluding Contracts of Employment on 21 March
2005 by which it dismissed the applicant's application of
24 November 2004, reclassified as a claim, against the deci-
sion fixing the grade and remuneration determined for the
applicant in his capacity as contract staff under the terms of
the contract which entered into effect on 16 September
2004;

— in so far as necessary, annul also the original decision, by
which the grade and remuneration were fixed for the appli-
cant in his capacity as a contract staff under the terms of
the contract which entered into effect on 16 September
2004;

— order

the defendant

to pay EUR 25 000 by way of
damages, subject to an increase or decrease or further speci-
fications;

— order the defendant to pay the costs.

— annul the decision adopted by the Authority Responsible
for Concluding Contracts of Employment on 21 March
2005 by which it dismissed the applicant's application of
30 November 2004, reclassified as a claim, against the deci-
sion fixing the grade and remuneration determined for the
applicant in her capacity as contract staff under the terms
of the contract which entered into effect on 16 September
2004;

— in so far as necessary, annul also the original decision, by
which the grade and remuneration were fixed for the appli-
cant in her capacity as a contract staff under the terms of
the contract which entered into effect on 16 September
2004;

— order

the defendant

to pay EUR 25 000 by way of
damages, subject to an increase or decrease or further speci-
fications;

— order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are identical to those put
forward in Case T-253/05 Fernandez Tunon v Commission.