Order of the Court of First Instance of 29 June 2005 in Case T-254/04: Spyridon de Athanassios Pappas v Committee of the Regions of the European Union (Officials — Recruitment — Post of Secretary General of the Committee of the Regions — Enforcement of a judgment of the Court of First Instance annulling an appointment decision — Annulment by the institution of the vacancy notice and commencement of a new recruitment procedure)
Date: 2005-09-03
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: European Committee of the Regions, action for annulment (EU), appointment of staff, recruitment, servant (EU)

C 217/42

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

3.9.2005

established in Marsala (Italy), Consorzio vini Valdichiana, estab-
lished in Arezzo (Italy), Consorzio del vino nobile di Montepul-
ciano, established in Montepulciano (Italy), represented by L.
Spagnuolo Vigorita, P. Tanoni and R. Gandin, lawyers, against
the Commission of the European Communities (Agents: M.
Nolin and V. Di Bucci, with an address for service in Luxem-
bourg) — action for the annulment, or in the alternative,
partial
annulment of Commission Regulation (EC) No
316/2004 of 20 February 2004 amending Regulation (EC) No
753/2002 laying down certain rules for applying Council Regu-
lation (EC) No 1493/1999 as regards the description, designa-
tion, presentation and protection of certain wine sector
products (OJ 2004 L 55, p. 16) — the Court of First Instance
(Fourth Chamber),
composed of H. Legal, President, P.
Mengozzi and I. Wiszniewska-Białecka, Judges; H. Jung, Regis-
trar, made an order on 28 June 2005, the operative part of
which is as follows:

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. The applicants
Commission.

shall bear

their own costs and those of

the

(1) OJ C 179 of 10.7.2004.

October 2003 annulling procedure 2000/C 28 A/01 for
recruitment of a Secretary General for the Committee of the
Regions and commencing a new procedure for the same post
— the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber), composed of
M. Jaeger, President, V. Tiili and O. Czúcz, Judges; H. Jung,
Registrar, made an order on 29 June 2005, the operative part
of which is as follows:

1. The action is dismissed as,

in part,

inadmissible and,

in part,

manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

2. The parties shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 262 of 23.10.2004.

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 27 June 2005

in Case T-349/04 Parfümerie Douglas GmbH v Office for
Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and
Designs) (OHIM) (1)

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 29 June 2005

(Community trade mark — Removal of the earlier mark from
the register — No need to adjudicate)

in Case T-254/04: Spyridon de Athanassios Pappas v
Committee of the Regions of the European Union (1)

(Officials — Recruitment — Post of Secretary General of the
Committee of the Regions — Enforcement of a judgment of
the Court of First Instance annulling an appointment decision
— Annulment by the institution of the vacancy notice and
commencement of a new recruitment procedure)

(2005/C 217/92)

(Language of the case: French)

In Case T-254/04: Spyridon de Athanassios Pappas, residing in
Kraainem (Belgium), represented by X. Gousta, lawyer, against
Committee of the Regions of the European Union (Agent: P.
Cervilla, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer) — action for annul-
ment of the decision of the Committee of the Regions of 8

(2005/C 217/93)

(Language of the case: German)

In Case T-349/04: Parfümerie Douglas GmbH, established in
Hagen (Germany), represented by C. Schumann, lawyer, against
Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks
and Designs) (OHIM) (Agent: A. von Mühlendahl), the other
party to the proceedings before the OHIM Board of Appeal
having been Jürgen Heinz Douglas,
residing in Hamburg
(Germany) — action brought against the decision of the First
Board of Appeal of OHIM of 24 May 2004 (Case R 795/2002-
4)
relating to opposition proceedings between Parfümerie
Douglas GmbH and Jürgen Heinz Douglas — the Court of First
Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of M. Vilaras, President, F.
Dehousse and D. Šváby, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an
order on 27 June 2005, the operative part of which is as
follows:

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application.