Order of the Court of First Instance of 27 June 2005 in Case T-349/04 Parfümerie Douglas GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Removal of the earlier mark from the register — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2005-09-03
Institutions: Court of First Instance
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), hiring, motor vehicle, service, trade-mark law, travel

C 217/42

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

3.9.2005

established in Marsala (Italy), Consorzio vini Valdichiana, estab-
lished in Arezzo (Italy), Consorzio del vino nobile di Montepul-
ciano, established in Montepulciano (Italy), represented by L.
Spagnuolo Vigorita, P. Tanoni and R. Gandin, lawyers, against
the Commission of the European Communities (Agents: M.
Nolin and V. Di Bucci, with an address for service in Luxem-
bourg) — action for the annulment, or in the alternative,
partial
annulment of Commission Regulation (EC) No
316/2004 of 20 February 2004 amending Regulation (EC) No
753/2002 laying down certain rules for applying Council Regu-
lation (EC) No 1493/1999 as regards the description, designa-
tion, presentation and protection of certain wine sector
products (OJ 2004 L 55, p. 16) — the Court of First Instance
(Fourth Chamber),
composed of H. Legal, President, P.
Mengozzi and I. Wiszniewska-Białecka, Judges; H. Jung, Regis-
trar, made an order on 28 June 2005, the operative part of
which is as follows:

1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2. The applicants
Commission.

shall bear

their own costs and those of

the

(1) OJ C 179 of 10.7.2004.

October 2003 annulling procedure 2000/C 28 A/01 for
recruitment of a Secretary General for the Committee of the
Regions and commencing a new procedure for the same post
— the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber), composed of
M. Jaeger, President, V. Tiili and O. Czúcz, Judges; H. Jung,
Registrar, made an order on 29 June 2005, the operative part
of which is as follows:

1. The action is dismissed as,

in part,

inadmissible and,

in part,

manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

2. The parties shall bear their own costs.

(1) OJ C 262 of 23.10.2004.

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 27 June 2005

in Case T-349/04 Parfümerie Douglas GmbH v Office for
Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and
Designs) (OHIM) (1)

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 29 June 2005

(Community trade mark — Removal of the earlier mark from
the register — No need to adjudicate)

in Case T-254/04: Spyridon de Athanassios Pappas v
Committee of the Regions of the European Union (1)

(Officials — Recruitment — Post of Secretary General of the
Committee of the Regions — Enforcement of a judgment of
the Court of First Instance annulling an appointment decision
— Annulment by the institution of the vacancy notice and
commencement of a new recruitment procedure)

(2005/C 217/92)

(Language of the case: French)

In Case T-254/04: Spyridon de Athanassios Pappas, residing in
Kraainem (Belgium), represented by X. Gousta, lawyer, against
Committee of the Regions of the European Union (Agent: P.
Cervilla, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer) — action for annul-
ment of the decision of the Committee of the Regions of 8

(2005/C 217/93)

(Language of the case: German)

In Case T-349/04: Parfümerie Douglas GmbH, established in
Hagen (Germany), represented by C. Schumann, lawyer, against
Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks
and Designs) (OHIM) (Agent: A. von Mühlendahl), the other
party to the proceedings before the OHIM Board of Appeal
having been Jürgen Heinz Douglas,
residing in Hamburg
(Germany) — action brought against the decision of the First
Board of Appeal of OHIM of 24 May 2004 (Case R 795/2002-
4)
relating to opposition proceedings between Parfümerie
Douglas GmbH and Jürgen Heinz Douglas — the Court of First
Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of M. Vilaras, President, F.
Dehousse and D. Šváby, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an
order on 27 June 2005, the operative part of which is as
follows:

1. There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application.

3.9.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/43

2. Each party shall bear its own costs.

4. The Council shall bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 300, 4.12.2004

(1) OJ C 284 of 20.11.2004

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 28 June 2005

in Case T-386/04 Eridania SpA and Others v Commission
of the European Communities (1)

(Common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector —
Pricing system — Regionalisation — Deficit areas — Classi-
fication of Italy — Marketing year 2004/2005 — Regulation
(EC) No 1216/2004 — Action for annulment — Natural and
legal persons — Inadmissibility)

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

of 1 July 2005

in Case T-482/04: KOMSA Kommunikation Sachsen AG v
Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade
Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

(Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the
opposition — Case does not proceed to judgment)

(2005/C 217/94)

(Language of the case: Italian)

(2005/C 217/95)

(Language of the case: German)

In Case T-386/04: Eridania Sadam SpA and Others, established
in Bologna (Italy), Italia Zuccheri SpA, established in Bologna,
Zuccherificio del Molise SpA, established in Termoli
(Italy),
CO.PRO. B — Cooperativa produttori bieticoli Soc. coop. rl,
established in Minerbio (Italy), SFIR — Società fondiaria indus-
triale romagnola SpA, established in Cesena (Italy), represented
by G. Pittalis,
I. Vigliotti, G. M. Roberti, P. Ziotti and A.
Franchi, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg,
against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: C.
Cattabriga and L. Visaggio, with an address for service in
Luxembourg), supported by the Council of the European Union
(Agent: F. Ruggeri Laderchi), — action for annulment of Article
1(d) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1216/2004 of 30 June
2004 fixing the derived intervention prices for white sugar for
the marketing year 2004/2005 (OJ L 232, of 01.07.2004,
p.25) — the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed
of M. Vilaras, President, M.E. Martins Ribeiro and K. Jürimae,
Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 28 June 2005, the
operative part of which is as follows:

1. The application is dismissed as inadmissible.

In Case T-482/04: KOMSA Kommunikation Sachsen AG, estab-
lished in Hartmannsdorf (Germany), represented by F. Hage-
mann, lawyer, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal
Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agent: T. Eichen-
berg), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of
Appeal of OHIM having been Anders + Kern Präsentationssys-
teme GmbH & Co. KG, established in Norderstedt (Germany)
— action against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of
OHIM of 6 September 2004 (Case R 65/2003-4), concerning
opposition proceedings between KOMSA Kommunikation
Sachsen AG and Anders + Kern Präsentationssysteme GmbH &
Instance (First Chamber),
Co. KG — the Court of First
composed of J. D. Cooke, President, R. García-Valdecasas and I.
Labucka, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 1 July
2005, the operative part of which is as follows:

1. There is no need to adjudicate on the application.

2. The parties shall bear their own costs.

2. There is no need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene of
the Associazione nazionale bieticoltori, the Consorzio nazionale
bieticoltori and the Associazione bieticoltori italiani.

(1) OJ C 57 of 5.3.2005.

3. The applicants, in addition to bearing their own costs, shall pay

those incurred by the Commission.